Invariant subspace problem

Last updated December 06, 2024

In the field of mathematics known as functional analysis, the invariant subspace problem is a partially unresolved problem asking whether every bounded operator on a complex Banach space sends some non-trivial closed subspace to itself. Many variants of the problem have been solved, by restricting the class of bounded operators considered or by specifying a particular class of Banach spaces. The problem is still open for separable Hilbert spaces (in other words, each example, found so far, of an operator with no non-trivial invariant subspaces is an operator that acts on a Banach space that is not isomorphic to a separable Hilbert space).

History

The problem seems to have been stated in the mid-20th century after work by Beurling and von Neumann,^[1] who found (but never published) a positive solution for the case of compact operators. It was then posed by Paul Halmos for the case of operators $T$ such that $T^{2}$ is compact. This was resolved affirmatively, for the more general class of polynomially compact operators (operators $T$ such that $p(T)$ is a compact operator for a suitably chosen non-zero polynomial $p$ ), by Allen R. Bernstein and Abraham Robinson in 1966 (see Non-standard analysis § Invariant subspace problem for a summary of the proof).

For Banach spaces, the first example of an operator without an invariant subspace was constructed by Per Enflo. He proposed a counterexample to the invariant subspace problem in 1975, publishing an outline in 1976. Enflo submitted the full article in 1981 and the article's complexity and length delayed its publication to 1987^[2] Enflo's long "manuscript had a world-wide circulation among mathematicians"^[1] and some of its ideas were described in publications besides Enflo (1976).^[3] Enflo's works inspired a similar construction of an operator without an invariant subspace for example by Bernard Beauzamy, who acknowledged Enflo's ideas.^[2]

In the 1990s, Enflo developed a "constructive" approach to the invariant subspace problem on Hilbert spaces.^[4]

In May 2023, a preprint of Enflo appeared on arXiv,^[5] which, if correct, solves the problem for Hilbert spaces and completes the picture.

In July 2023, a second and independent preprint of Neville appeared on arXiv,^[6] claiming the solution of the problem for separable Hilbert spaces.

In September 2024, A peer-reviewed article published in Axioms journal by a team of four Jordanian academic researchers announced that they had solved the Invariant subspace problem.^[7] However, basic mistakes in the proof were pointed out.^[8]^[9]

Precise statement

Formally, the invariant subspace problem for a complex Banach space $H$ of dimension > 1 is the question whether every bounded linear operator $T:H\to H$ has a non-trivial closed $T$ -invariant subspace: a closed linear subspace $W$ of $H$ , which is different from $\{0\}$ and from $H$ , such that $T(W)\subset W$ .

A negative answer to the problem is closely related to properties of the orbits $T$ . If $x$ is an element of the Banach space $H$ , the orbit of $x$ under the action of $T$ , denoted by $[x]$ , is the subspace generated by the sequence $\{T^{n}(x)\,:\,n\geq 0\}$ . This is also called the $T$ -cyclic subspace generated by $x$ . From the definition it follows that $[x]$ is a $T$ -invariant subspace. Moreover, it is the minimal $T$ -invariant subspace containing $x$ : if $W$ is another invariant subspace containing $x$ , then necessarily $T^{n}(x)\in W$ for all $n\geq 0$ (since $W$ is $T$ -invariant), and so $[x]\subset W$ . If $x$ is non-zero, then $[x]$ is not equal to $\{0\}$ , so its closure is either the whole space $H$ (in which case $x$ is said to be a cyclic vector for $T$ ) or it is a non-trivial $T$ -invariant subspace. Therefore, a counterexample to the invariant subspace problem would be a Banach space $H$ and a bounded operator $T:H\to H$ for which every non-zero vector $x\in H$ is a cyclic vector for $T$ . (Where a "cyclic vector" $x$ for an operator $T$ on a Banach space $H$ means one for which the orbit $[x]$ of $x$ is dense in $H$ .)

Known special cases

While the case of the invariant subspace problem for separable Hilbert spaces is still open, several other cases have been settled for topological vector spaces (over the field of complex numbers):

For finite-dimensional complex vector spaces, every operator admits an eigenvector, so it has a 1-dimensional invariant subspace.
The conjecture is true if the Hilbert space $H$ is not separable (i.e. if it has an uncountable orthonormal basis). In fact, if $x$ is a non-zero vector in $H$ , the norm closure of the linear orbit $[x]$ is separable (by construction) and hence a proper subspace and also invariant.
von Neumann showed^[10] that any compact operator on a Hilbert space of dimension at least 2 has a non-trivial invariant subspace.
The spectral theorem shows that all normal operators admit invariant subspaces.
Aronszajn & Smith (1954) proved that every compact operator on any Banach space of dimension at least 2 has an invariant subspace.
Bernstein & Robinson (1966) proved using non-standard analysis that if the operator $T$ on a Hilbert space is polynomially compact (in other words $p(T)$ is compact for some non-zero polynomial $p$ ) then $T$ has an invariant subspace. Their proof uses the original idea of embedding the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space in a hyperfinite-dimensional Hilbert space (see Non-standard analysis#Invariant subspace problem).
Halmos (1966), after having seen Robinson's preprint, eliminated the non-standard analysis from it and provided a shorter proof in the same issue of the same journal.
Lomonosov (1973) gave a very short proof using the Schauder fixed point theorem that if the operator $T$ on a Banach space commutes with a non-zero compact operator then $T$ has a non-trivial invariant subspace. This includes the case of polynomially compact operators because an operator commutes with any polynomial in itself. More generally, he showed that if $S$ commutes with a non-scalar operator $T$ that commutes with a non-zero compact operator, then $S$ has an invariant subspace.^[11]
The first example of an operator on a Banach space with no non-trivial invariant subspaces was found by PerEnflo ( 1976 , 1987 ), and his example was simplified by Beauzamy (1985).
The first counterexample on a "classical" Banach space was found by CharlesRead ( 1984 , 1985 ), who described an operator on the classical Banach space $l_{1}$ with no invariant subspaces.
Later CharlesRead ( 1988 ) constructed an operator on $l_{1}$ without even a non-trivial closed invariant subset, that is that for every vector $x$ the set $\{T^{n}(x)\,:\,n\geq 0\}$ is dense, in which case the vector is called hypercyclic (the difference with the case of cyclic vectors is that we are not taking the subspace generated by the points $\{T^{n}(x)\,:\,n\geq 0\}$ in this case).
Atzmon (1983) gave an example of an operator without invariant subspaces on a nuclear Fréchet space.
Śliwa (2008) proved that any infinite dimensional Banach space of countable type over a non-Archimedean field admits a bounded linear operator without a non-trivial closed invariant subspace. This completely solves the non-Archimedean version of this problem, posed by van Rooij and Schikhof in 1992.
Argyros & Haydon (2011) gave the construction of an infinite-dimensional Banach space such that every continuous operator is the sum of a compact operator and a scalar operator, so in particular every operator has an invariant subspace.

Notes

1 2 Yadav (2005) , p. 292.
1 2 Beauzamy (1988); Yadav (2005).
↑ See, for example, Radjavi & Rosenthal (1982).
↑ Page 401 in Foiaş, Ciprian; Jung, Il Bong; Ko, Eungil; Pearcy, Carl (2005). "On quasinilpotent operators. III". Journal of Operator Theory. 54 (2): 401–414.. Enflo's method of ("forward") "minimal vectors" is also noted in the review of this research article by Gilles Cassier in Mathematical Reviews : MR 2186363
↑ Enflo, Per H. (May 26, 2023). "On the invariant subspace problem in Hilbert spaces". arXiv: 2305.15442 [math.FA].
↑ Neville, Charles W. (July 21, 2023). "a proof of the invariant subspace conjecture for separable Hilbert spaces". arXiv: 2307.08176 [math.FA].
↑ Khalil, Roshdi; Yousef, Abdelrahman; Alshanti, Waseem Ghazi; Hammad, Ma’mon Abu (2024-09-02). "The Invariant Subspace Problem for Separable Hilbert Spaces". Axioms. 13 (9): 598. doi: 10.3390/axioms13090598 . ISSN 2075-1680.
↑ Ghatasheh, Ahmed (Nov 28, 2024). "Refuting a recent proof of the invariant subspace problem". arXiv: 2411.19409 .
↑ See mathoverflow: .
↑ Von Neumann's proof was never published, as relayed in a private communication to the authors of Aronszajn & Smith (1954). A version of that proof, independently discovered by Aronszajn, is included at the end of that paper.
↑ See Pearcy & Shields (1974) for a review.

Related Research Articles

In mathematics, more specifically in functional analysis, a Banach space is a complete normed vector space. Thus, a Banach space is a vector space with a metric that allows the computation of vector length and distance between vectors and is complete in the sense that a Cauchy sequence of vectors always converges to a well-defined limit that is within the space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Functional analysis</span> Area of mathematics

Functional analysis is a branch of mathematical analysis, the core of which is formed by the study of vector spaces endowed with some kind of limit-related structure and the linear functions defined on these spaces and suitably respecting these structures. The historical roots of functional analysis lie in the study of spaces of functions and the formulation of properties of transformations of functions such as the Fourier transform as transformations defining, for example, continuous or unitary operators between function spaces. This point of view turned out to be particularly useful for the study of differential and integral equations.

In mathematics, a topological space is called separable if it contains a countable, dense subset; that is, there exists a sequence $of elements of the space such that every nonempty open subset of the space contains at least one element of the sequence.$

In mathematics, particularly linear algebra and functional analysis, a spectral theorem is a result about when a linear operator or matrix can be diagonalized. This is extremely useful because computations involving a diagonalizable matrix can often be reduced to much simpler computations involving the corresponding diagonal matrix. The concept of diagonalization is relatively straightforward for operators on finite-dimensional vector spaces but requires some modification for operators on infinite-dimensional spaces. In general, the spectral theorem identifies a class of linear operators that can be modeled by multiplication operators, which are as simple as one can hope to find. In more abstract language, the spectral theorem is a statement about commutative C*-algebras. See also spectral theory for a historical perspective.

In the area of mathematics known as functional analysis, a reflexive space is a locally convex topological vector space for which the canonical evaluation map from $into its bidual is a homeomorphism. A normed space is reflexive if and only if this canonical evaluation map is surjective, in which case this evaluation map is an isometric isomorphism and the normed space is a Banach space. Those spaces for which the canonical evaluation map is surjective are called semi-reflexive spaces.$

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, Fréchet spaces, named after Maurice Fréchet, are special topological vector spaces. They are generalizations of Banach spaces. All Banach and Hilbert spaces are Fréchet spaces. Spaces of infinitely differentiable functions are typical examples of Fréchet spaces, many of which are typically not Banach spaces.

In mathematics, a von Neumann algebra or W*-algebra is a *-algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology and contains the identity operator. It is a special type of C*-algebra.

In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, a compact operator is a linear operator $, where are normed vector spaces, with the property that maps bounded subsets of to relatively compact subsets of . Such an operator is necessarily a bounded operator, and so continuous. Some authors require that are Banach, but the definition can be extended to more general spaces.$

In mathematics, an invariant subspace of a linear mapping T : V → V i.e. from some vector space V to itself, is a subspace W of V that is preserved by T. More generally, an invariant subspace for a collection of linear mappings is a subspace preserved by each mapping individually.

In mathematics, especially in functional analysis, the Tsirelson space is the first example of a Banach space in which neither an ℓ^p space nor a c₀ space can be embedded. The Tsirelson space is reflexive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Approximation property</span> Mathematical concept

In mathematics, specifically functional analysis, a Banach space is said to have the approximation property (AP), if every compact operator is a limit of finite-rank operators. The converse is always true.

In mathematics, a Schauder basis or countable basis is similar to the usual (Hamel) basis of a vector space; the difference is that Hamel bases use linear combinations that are finite sums, while for Schauder bases they may be infinite sums. This makes Schauder bases more suitable for the analysis of infinite-dimensional topological vector spaces including Banach spaces.

An infinite-dimensional Lebesgue measure is a measure defined on infinite-dimensional normed vector spaces, such as Banach spaces, which resembles the Lebesgue measure used in finite-dimensional spaces.

In the mathematical discipline of functional analysis, the concept of a compact operator on Hilbert space is an extension of the concept of a matrix acting on a finite-dimensional vector space; in Hilbert space, compact operators are precisely the closure of finite-rank operators in the topology induced by the operator norm. As such, results from matrix theory can sometimes be extended to compact operators using similar arguments. By contrast, the study of general operators on infinite-dimensional spaces often requires a genuinely different approach.

Per H. Enflo is a Swedish mathematician working primarily in functional analysis, a field in which he solved problems that had been considered fundamental. Three of these problems had been open for more than forty years:

In mathematics, Hilbert spaces allow the methods of linear algebra and calculus to be generalized from (finite-dimensional) Euclidean vector spaces to spaces that may be infinite-dimensional. Hilbert spaces arise naturally and frequently in mathematics and physics, typically as function spaces. Formally, a Hilbert space is a vector space equipped with an inner product that induces a distance function for which the space is a complete metric space. A Hilbert space is a special case of a Banach space.

In mathematics, especially functional analysis, a hypercyclic operator on a topological vector space X is a continuous linear operator T: X → X such that there is a vector x ∈ X for which the sequence {Tⁿx: n = 0, 1, 2, …} is dense in the whole space X. In other words, the smallest closed invariant subset containing x is the whole space. Such an x is then called hypercyclic vector. There is no hypercyclic operator in finite-dimensional spaces, but the property of hypercyclicity in spaces of infinite dimension is not a rare phenomenon: many operators are hypercyclic.

In mathematics, a singular trace is a trace on a space of linear operators of a separable Hilbert space that vanishes on operators of finite rank. Singular traces are a feature of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces such as the space of square-summable sequences and spaces of square-integrable functions. Linear operators on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space have only the zero functional as a singular trace since all operators have finite rank. For example, matrix algebras have no non-trivial singular traces and the matrix trace is the unique trace up to scaling.

In mathematics, the Calkin correspondence, named after mathematician John Williams Calkin, is a bijective correspondence between two-sided ideals of bounded linear operators of a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space and Calkin sequence spaces. The correspondence is implemented by mapping an operator to its singular value sequence.

This is a glossary for the terminology in a mathematical field of functional analysis.

References

Abramovich, Yuri A.; Aliprantis, Charalambos D. (2002), An Invitation to Operator Theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 50, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, doi: 10.1090/gsm/050 , ISBN 978-0-8218-2146-6, MR 1921782
Argyros, Spiros A.; Haydon, Richard G. (2011), "A hereditarily indecomposable L_∞-space that solves the scalar-plus-compact problem", Acta Math. , 206 (1): 1–54, arXiv: 0903.3921 , doi:10.1007/s11511-011-0058-y, MR 2784662, S2CID 119532059
Aronszajn, N.; Smith, K. T. (1954), "Invariant subspaces of completely continuous operators", Annals of Mathematics , Second Series, 60 (2): 345–350, doi:10.2307/1969637, JSTOR 1969637, MR 0065807
Atzmon, Aharon (1983), "An operator without invariant subspaces on a nuclear Fréchet space", Annals of Mathematics , Second Series, 117 (3): 669–694, doi:10.2307/2007039, JSTOR 2007039, MR 0701260
Beauzamy, Bernard (1985), "Un opérateur sans sous-espace invariant: simplification de l'exemple de P. Enflo" [An operator with no invariant subspace: simplification of the example of P. Enflo], Integral Equations and Operator Theory (in French), 8 (3): 314–384, doi:10.1007/BF01202903, MR 0792905, S2CID 121418247
Beauzamy, Bernard (1988), Introduction to operator theory and invariant subspaces, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 42, Amsterdam: North-Holland, ISBN 978-0-444-70521-1, MR 0967989
Bernstein, Allen R.; Robinson, Abraham (1966), "Solution of an invariant subspace problem of K. T. Smith and P. R. Halmos", Pacific Journal of Mathematics , 16 (3): 421–431, doi: 10.2140/pjm.1966.16.421 , MR 0193504
Enflo, Per (1976), "On the invariant subspace problem in Banach spaces", Séminaire Maurey--Schwartz (1975--1976) Espaces L^p, applications radonifiantes et géométrie des espaces de Banach, Exp. Nos. 14-15, Centre Math., École Polytech., Palaiseau, p. 7, MR 0473871
Enflo, Per (1987), "On the invariant subspace problem for Banach spaces", Acta Mathematica , 158 (3): 213–313, doi: 10.1007/BF02392260 , MR 0892591
Enflo, Per; Lomonosov, Victor (2001), "Some aspects of the invariant subspace problem", Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, vol. I, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 533–559, doi:10.1016/S1874-5849(01)80015-2, ISBN 9780444828422, MR 1863701
Halmos, Paul R. (1966), "Invariant subspaces of polynomially compact operators", Pacific Journal of Mathematics , 16 (3): 433–437, doi: 10.2140/pjm.1966.16.433 , MR 0193505
Lomonosov, V. I. (1973), "Invariant subspaces of the family of operators that commute with a completely continuous operator", Akademija Nauk SSSR. Funkcional' Nyi Analiz I Ego Prilozenija, 7 (3): 55–56, doi:10.1007/BF01080698, MR 0420305, S2CID 121421267
Pearcy, Carl; Shields, Allen L. (1974), "A survey of the Lomonosov technique in the theory of invariant subspaces", in C. Pearcy (ed.), Topics in operator theory, Mathematical Surveys, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, pp. 219–229, MR 0355639
Read, C. J. (1984), "A solution to the invariant subspace problem", The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16 (4): 337–401, doi:10.1112/blms/16.4.337, MR 0749447
Read, C. J. (1985), "A solution to the invariant subspace problem on the space l₁", The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 17 (4): 305–317, doi:10.1112/blms/17.4.305, MR 0806634
Read, C. J. (1988), "The invariant subspace problem for a class of Banach spaces, 2: hypercyclic operators", Israel Journal of Mathematics , 63 (1): 1–40, doi: 10.1007/BF02765019 , MR 0959046, S2CID 123651876
Radjavi, Heydar; Rosenthal, Peter (1982), "The invariant subspace problem", The Mathematical Intelligencer , 4 (1): 33–37, doi:10.1007/BF03022994, MR 0678734, S2CID 122811130
Radjavi, Heydar; Rosenthal, Peter (2003), Invariant Subspaces (Second ed.), Mineola, NY: Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-42822-2, MR 2003221
Radjavi, Heydar; Rosenthal, Peter (2000), Simultaneous triangularization, Universitext, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. xii+318, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1200-3, ISBN 978-0-387-98467-4, MR 1736065
Śliwa, Wiesław (2008), "The Invariant Subspace Problem for Non-Archimedean Banach Spaces" (PDF), Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , 51 (4): 604–617, doi:10.4153/CMB-2008-060-9, hdl: 10593/798 , MR 2462465, S2CID 40430187
Yadav, B. S. (2005), "The present state and heritages of the invariant subspace problem", Milan Journal of Mathematics, 73 (1): 289–316, doi:10.1007/s00032-005-0048-7, MR 2175046, S2CID 121068326

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Yadav,_page_292-1] 1 2 Yadav (2005) , p. 292.

[Beauzamy_1988;_Yadav-2] 1 2 Beauzamy (1988); Yadav (2005).

[3] See, for example, Radjavi & Rosenthal (1982).

[4] Page 401 in Foiaş, Ciprian; Jung, Il Bong; Ko, Eungil; Pearcy, Carl (2005). "On quasinilpotent operators. III". Journal of Operator Theory. 54 (2): 401–414.. Enflo's method of ("forward") "minimal vectors" is also noted in the review of this research article by Gilles Cassier in Mathematical Reviews : MR 2186363

[5] Enflo, Per H. (May 26, 2023). "On the invariant subspace problem in Hilbert spaces". arXiv: 2305.15442 [math.FA].

[6] Neville, Charles W. (July 21, 2023). "a proof of the invariant subspace conjecture for separable Hilbert spaces". arXiv: 2307.08176 [math.FA].

[7] Khalil, Roshdi; Yousef, Abdelrahman; Alshanti, Waseem Ghazi; Hammad, Ma’mon Abu (2024-09-02). "The Invariant Subspace Problem for Separable Hilbert Spaces". Axioms. 13 (9): 598. doi: 10.3390/axioms13090598 . ISSN 2075-1680.

[8] Ghatasheh, Ahmed (Nov 28, 2024). "Refuting a recent proof of the invariant subspace problem". arXiv: 2411.19409 .

[9] See mathoverflow: .

[10] Von Neumann's proof was never published, as relayed in a private communication to the authors of Aronszajn & Smith (1954). A version of that proof, independently discovered by Aronszajn, is included at the end of that paper.

[11] See Pearcy & Shields (1974) for a review.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]