Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Event-based trading |
Founded | 2018 |
Headquarters | 594 Broadway New York, NY 10012 U.S. |
Key people |
|
Website | kalshi |
Kalshi Inc. is an American financial exchange and prediction market based in Lower Manhattan, New York City, offering event contracts. Launched in July 2021, it offers a platform where both retail and institutional traders can place trades on various future events, including economic indicators, weather patterns, awards, as well as political and legislative outcomes. The platform enables users to trade on yes-or-no questions, with contracts priced based on the market's estimated probability of an event occurring. The exchange provides contracts that pay out $1 for correct selections. In October 2024, Kalshi received approval to reintroduce election markets, allowing users to wager on political outcomes, such as congressional control and presidential elections.
Founded in 2018, Kalshi was established by Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara. [1] [2] The idea for the company emerged during their tenure as financial analysts, where they identified challenges faced by investors attempting to hedge their investments amidst uncertainties such as the Brexit referendum. The founders note that the absence of a direct safeguard against unfavorable outcomes was what prompted them to envision a platform that would allow investors to engage in wagers on future events, providing a means to hedge uncertainties and capitalize on insights. [3]
After attempting for 18 months, Mansour and Lara obtained a federal license from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on November 3, 2020, [4] registering as a designated contract market. [5] [6] Kalshi's case was strengthened by the presence of several prediction markets that operated without seeking regulatory approval, such as Polymarket and Augur. [4] The name "Kalshi" signifies "everything" in Arabic. [7] [8] Kalshi's trading platform launched in July 2021. [3]
As a trading exchange, Kalshi allows both retail and institutional traders to place trades on various future events, spanning topics like weather and climate change, [8] [9] the Oscars, [10] tax changes, [11] inflation, [12] music festival cancellations, [13] album sales and digital streaming milestones, [14] Covid vaccine uptake, [1] recession likelihood, [15] and the potential for the United States to default on its debt by the year's end. [16] The platform also covers markets related to presidential approval rating, significant legislation passing Congress, and U.S. Supreme Court cases. [8]
Trading is based on opinions about specific yes-or-no questions. Users pick a side and price (1 cent to 99 cents), and when the opposing yes and no sides total $1 per contract, a trade occurs. Whichever side turns out to be correct keeps the full $1. The contract price reflects the market's estimated probability of an event happening. The exchange provides contracts that pay out $1 for correct selections. [7] Traders are not allowed to use margin to take positions on the platform. [17] As of April 2023, the bet limit allowed on the platform is $25,000, [18] although certain contracts allow a maximum wager of $7 million. Users are prohibited from wagering more than the amount they have deposited. [4] Kalshi charges transaction fees per trade but does not rely on traders' losses for its revenue. [10]
On October 2, 2024, a federal appeals court in Washington D.C. allowed Kalshi to revive the first fully regulated election markets in the U.S. by lifting a temporary freeze on trading. The three-judge panel rejected Wall Street regulators' emergency request to halt the markets during an appeal process. Judge Patricia Millett highlighted the CFTC's failure to prove that these contracts threatened election integrity. described the ruling as a "major win for the burgeoning political betting complex in the U.S." It enabled Kalshi to offer trades on which party would control Congress, with plans to expand into other political contests, including the presidential election. Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour described it as a "new era for financial markets." Fully regulated by the CFTC, Kalshi allows wagers of up to $100 million on election markets, unlike offshore markets and academic ventures, which previously restricted American traders to small wagers of a few hundred dollars. [19]
On October 3, Kalshi introduced a contract on the presidential election winner, providing a mechanism for hedging potential losses. Following the favorable ruling, the platform listed over two dozen new options related to political outcomes, including the presidential race, popular vote, Electoral College margins, and individual Senate contests. By October 9, more than $3 million had been traded on Kalshi's site, primarily on contracts concerning whether Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump would win the election. Additional options covered outcomes of individual Senate races, the tipping-point state in the presidential election, swing state results, and the margin of victory. [20]
Mansour has emphasized that these contracts serve as a tool for investors to hedge against financial impacts from various political outcomes, rather than trying to influence elections, and that they capture risks such as the potential effects of presidential tariffs on financial situations. He has also noted that Kalshi's political outcome contracts offer a more direct hedging approach compared to traditional investment bank "bundles" that hedge against the election of specific candidates and has highlighted a diverse customer base that includes both risk hedgers and speculators. [20]
Kalshi has been described as a "new competitor for PredictIt", [21] offering a similar experience but with regulatory approval as a traditional futures market. [22] PredictIt operates as a nonprofit research project, restricting the number of traders to 5,000 per event and capping trade sizes at $850 per person per question. [23] In contrast, Kalshi operates as a designated contract market [14] and allows users to invest up to $25,000 on a single contract (and up to $7 million on certain contracts). [23]
Although Kalshi lacks formal standing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), its current offerings are limited enough that it is expected to operate under the regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) alone. Matthew Kluchenek, a partner at Mayer Brown, stated that the SEC may intervene if the contract market is perceived to have an impact on securities prices in other markets. [17] Kalshi has engaged in talks with brokerage firms to include its platform in their listings and with other investment firms to act as market makers on the exchange. Orders on Kalshi remain on the books until a second trader is willing to take the opposing side of the contract, potentially resulting in lower volumes and liquidity. The company has an affiliate called Kalshi Trading, which trades and provides liquidity for many of its contracts. [17]
Kalshi faces challenges in dealing with questions that have continuous answers and providing clear results to a large user base. [7] The company aims to attract larger investors who may leverage it for hedging purposes and capitalize on opportunities presented by less-informed participants. However, broader adoption faces hurdles, such as the zero-sum nature of prediction markets and the need for increased liquidity to entice larger investors. [24]
Kalshi has faced regulatory challenges in its efforts to create markets regarding political control of Congress. The company has sought approval from the CFTC to introduce election contracts resembling options or futures. These contracts are "cash-settled, binary contracts" based on questions such as which political party will control a specific chamber of Congress. [11]
Kalshi's application faced delays as the CFTC closely examined whether Kalshi's contracts could effectively serve as hedges. Commissioner Caroline Pham, one of the CFTC's top two Republican officials, dissented on the decision to review Kalshi's political event contracts in August 2022. She argued that the underlying activity of the contracts, which involves political control, is not prohibited and that the agency had not established a clear test for what goes against the public interest, eliminating the need for a public interest test. In October 2022, the commission staff recommended against Kalshi's proposal to introduce higher-stakes futures contracts related to the control of Congress resulting from the midterm elections, and the CFTC delayed a decision on Kalshi's application. [18]
In 2023, a monthslong legal dispute began between the Kalshi and the CFTC over political event contracts. The company maintains that its contracts serve the public interest by offering accurate election forecasting data and enabling individuals to hedge against various outcomes. In contrast, the CFTC contends that these contracts constitute illegal gambling and that it lacks the resources to oversee them effectively. Chairman Rostin Behnam has cautioned that allowing election contracts could "ultimately commoditize and degrade the integrity" of the electoral process. [25]
In June 2023, Kalshi proposed a new plan that would allow hedge funds and other major Wall Street firms to wager up to $100 million on which US political party would control Congress. Under the plan, all users could wager up to $250,000, but large trading firms could trade $50 million on the outcome of the next congressional elections, with those demonstrating an economic hedging need allowed to bet even more. [26] The CTFC opted to request a second round of public comment on Kalshi's plans. The two Republican commissioners, who were in the minority on the CFTC's board, dissented against the prolonged process, arguing that the question of whether Kalshi's products constitute prohibited "gaming" should be addressed directly through a clear rule. [27]
In September 2023, the CFTC rejected Kalshi's proposal to offer derivatives contracts on congressional control, which it deemed contrary to the public interest, citing concerns that the planned contracts would violate derivatives market regulations. The decision prohibited the listing, clearing, or trading of Kalshi's political event contracts. [28] In November, Kalshi filed a lawsuit against the CFTC over their denial of the company's bid, alleging that it had exceeded its authority in blocking their proposal. [29]
On September 12, 2024, DC District Court Judge Jia Cobb rejected the CFTC's attempt to delay the company's congressional control contracts, ruling in favor of Kalshi. Cobb stated that the agency had exceeded its authority by blocking these contracts, emphasizing that Kalshi's offerings do not constitute illegal activity or gaming, as they pertain to elections. [25] The CFTC quickly appealed the judge's decision to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, requesting an emergency stay. [30] They argued that the contracts were illegal and could potentially undermine election integrity. [25] Kalshi launched its election wagers just hours before the appellate ruling. The company warned that pausing Cobb's ruling would severely impact its operations, describing the CFTC's request as a tactic to stall their progress, while also noting the rise of the unregulated prediction market Polymarket following a recent presidential debate. [25]
On October 2, 2024, a U.S. federal appeals court denied the CFTC's request and upheld the lower court's decision, allowing Kalshi to offer political event contracts. The D.C. Circuit Court determined that the CFTC failed to demonstrate any potential harm to the public interest from Kalshi's event contracts. This ruling enabled Kalshi to offer trading ahead of the November 5 elections and may set a precedent for other firms looking to enter the prediction market space. [30] Judge Patricia Millett indicated that the CFTC could renew its request for a stay if new evidence emerges during the appeal process. [31] Politico described the ruling as a "major win for the burgeoning political betting complex in the U.S.," enabling Kalshi to offer trades on which party would control Congress, with plans to expand into other political contests, including the presidential election. CEO Tarek Mansour referred to it as a "new era for financial markets." [19]
Kalshi relaunched its congressional control contracts on the same day, [32] allowing Americans to wager on which party will control the House and Senate in 2025. These contracts were initially introduced on September 12 after the U.S. District Court judge rejected the CFTC's attempt to block them, but the CFTC's rapid appeal temporarily halted the offerings. [25]
Kalshi contends that bringing political trading to their platform would improve oversight and accessibility, transforming a historically underground practice into a legitimate option for everyday Americans. This move aims to help individuals navigate election-related risks, such as the effects of Congress' composition on tax policy, by providing tools for financial hedging. [33] They have argued that political event contracts not only serve the public interest by delivering accurate forecasting data but also empower users to manage financial uncertainties tied to evolving political landscapes, and have highlighted the significant activity in unregulated markets like Polymarket, which has seen over $1 billion in wagers on presidential races. [25]
Critics of election betting contracts argue that the contracts could threaten election integrity. [30] Consumer advocacy groups, such as D.C.-based Better Markets, express fears that such trading could turn elections into a new vehicle for day trading and further erode public trust in election results. In August 2023, in a letter to the CTFC, senators Jeff Merkley, Sheldon Whitehouse, Ed Markey, Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen and Dianne Feinstein urged the CFTC to reject Kalshi's proposal, raising concerns over electoral integrity. [34] Stephen Hall of Better Markets labeled the ruling "a sad and ominous day for election integrity" in the U.S. following the October 2024 ruling allowing Kalshi to list contracts on election outcomes. [25]
Proponents see election contracts as valuable financial tools. [30] Kalshi's proposals have been backed by prominent figures in the financial industry, including Vivek Ranadivé, co-owner of the Sacramento Kings, Jason Furman, a former White House economist, Intercontinental Exchange, which operates the New York Stock Exchange, as well as several former CFTC officials. [35] [36] Some market participants, including Angelo Lisboa, managing director of JPMorgan's private wealth management division, have expressed their support for Kalshi's proposals, recognizing election risk as a significant concern for their clients and noting the potential impact of bringing such capabilities to a broader population that lacks access to large banks' resources. [37]
In finance, a derivative is a contract that derives its value from the performance of an underlying entity. This underlying entity can be an asset, index, currency, or interest rate, and is often simply called the underlying. Derivatives can be used for a number of purposes, including insuring against price movements (hedging), increasing exposure to price movements for speculation, or getting access to otherwise hard-to-trade assets or markets.
Gambling is the wagering of something of value on a random event with the intent of winning something else of value, where instances of strategy are discounted. Gambling thus requires three elements to be present: consideration, risk (chance), and a prize. The outcome of the wager is often immediate, such as a single roll of dice, a spin of a roulette wheel, or a horse crossing the finish line, but longer time frames are also common, allowing wagers on the outcome of a future sports contest or even an entire sports season.
Spread betting is any of various types of wagering on the outcome of an event where the pay-off is based on the accuracy of the wager, rather than a simple "win or lose" outcome, such as fixed-odds betting or parimutuel betting.
The Policy Analysis Market (PAM), part of the FutureMAP project, was a proposed futures exchange developed, beginning in May 2001, by the Information Awareness Office (IAO) of the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and based on an idea first proposed by Net Exchange, a San Diego, California, research firm specializing in the development of online prediction markets. PAM was shut down in August 2003 after multiple US senators condemned it as an assassination and terrorism market, a characterization criticized in turn by futures-exchange expert Robin Hanson of George Mason University, and several journalists. Since PAM's closure, several private-sector variations on the idea have been launched.
Prediction markets, also known as betting markets, information markets, decision markets, idea futures or event derivatives, are open markets that enable the prediction of specific outcomes using financial incentives. They are exchange-traded markets established for trading bets in the outcome of various events. The market prices can indicate what the crowd thinks the probability of the event is. A typical prediction market contract is set up to trade between 0 and 100%. The most common form of a prediction market is a binary option market, which will expire at the price of 0 or 100%. Prediction markets can be thought of as belonging to the more general concept of crowdsourcing which is specially designed to aggregate information on particular topics of interest. The main purposes of prediction markets are eliciting aggregating beliefs over an unknown future outcome. Traders with different beliefs trade on contracts whose payoffs are related to the unknown future outcome and the market prices of the contracts are considered as the aggregated belief.
A hedge is an investment position intended to offset potential losses or gains that may be incurred by a companion investment. A hedge can be constructed from many types of financial instruments, including stocks, exchange-traded funds, insurance, forward contracts, swaps, options, gambles, many types of over-the-counter and derivative products, and futures contracts.
Sports betting is the activity of predicting sports results and placing a wager on the outcome.
The Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM) are a group of real-money prediction markets/futures markets operated by the University of Iowa Tippie College of Business. Unlike normal futures markets, the IEM is not-for-profit; the markets are run for educational and research purposes.
Nadex, formerly known as HedgeStreet, is a US-based retail-focused online binary options exchange. It offers retail trading of binary options and spreads on the most heavily traded forex, commodities and stock indices markets.
Prediction markets company NewsFutures (2000-2010) evolved into Lumenogic (2010-2019), "a consulting firm that specializes in developing and customizing online systems for large organizations to use to gather so-called Collective Intelligence from their employees", which in turn became Hypermind.
Intrade.com was a web-based trading exchange whose members "traded" contracts between each other on the probabilities of various events occurring. After having been forced to exclude US traders in 2012, on 10 March 2013 Intrade suspended all trading, citing possible "financial irregularities". For a time after the suspension, the intrade.com website stated that they were working on a relaunch of the site, called "Intrade 2.0", but as of August 2014 it states that "It appears very unlikely now that Intrade will resume trading services in the way it had operated previously", and announced plans to close all accounts and refund monies by 31 December 2014.
Political forecasting aims at forecasting the outcomes of political events. Political events can be a number of events such as diplomatic decisions, actions by political leaders and other areas relating to politicians and political institutions. The area of political forecasting concerning elections is highly popular, especially amongst mass market audiences. Political forecasting methodology makes frequent use of mathematics, statistics and data science. Political forecasting as it pertains to elections is related to psephology.
Financial betting refers to the wagering on the price development of a financial instrument at some later date relative to the current price or level of the instrument, against odds offered by a bookmaker. Maximum potential pay-off of the wager is known when the bet is taken and as a corollary risk is known beforehand by being limited to the initial stake.
iPredict was a New Zealand prediction market that offered prediction exchanges on current events, political issues and economic issues. iPredict was jointly owned by the New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation and Victoria University of Wellington. The site launched on 9 September 2008 and closed 1 December 2016.
In finance, box office futures is a type of futures contract in which investors speculate on upcoming movies based on their predicted performance.
Banc De Binary was an Israeli financial firm with a history of regulatory issues on three continents. On January 9, 2017, the company announced that it would be closing due to negative press coverage and its tarnished reputation. The firm also surrendered its brokerage license with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) removing its ability to legally trade in the European Union. Its 2014 revenues were reported as $100 million.
PredictIt is a New Zealand-based online prediction market that offers exchanges on political and financial events. PredictIt is owned and operated by Victoria University of Wellington with support from Aristotle, Inc. The company's office is located in Washington, D.C. Only United States citizens can bet on the site.
Augur is a decentralized prediction market platform built on the Ethereum blockchain. Augur is developed by Forecast Foundation, which was founded in 2014 by Jack Peterson, Joey Krug, and Jeremy Gardner. Forecast Foundation is advised by Ron Bernstein, founder of now-defunct company Intrade, and Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin.
Manifold, formerly known as Manifold Markets, is an online prediction market platform. Users engage in competitive forecasting using play money called 'mana', as well as 'Sweepcash,' which can be withdrawn for real money, or donated to charity. Topics on Manifold have included the 2024 United States presidential election and the Oscars. Sweepstakes are US only and 18+. All states are eligible except Washington, Michigan, Idaho, and Delaware.
Polymarket is an American financial exchange and the world's largest prediction market, headquartered on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, New York City and offering event contracts. Launched in 2020, it offers a decentralized platform where both retail and institutional traders can place bets on various future events, including economic indicators, weather patterns, awards, as well as political and legislative outcomes. Participants can deposit USDC cryptocurrency through the Polygon blockchain network and trade shares that represent the likelihood of specific outcomes occurring in the future.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)