Klumpenhouwer network

Last updated
7-note segment of interval cycle C7 7-note segment of C5.svg
7-note segment of interval cycle C7

In music, a Klumpenhouwer Network is "any network that uses T and/or I operations (transposition or inversion) to interpret interrelations among pcs" (pitch class sets). [1] According to George Perle, "a Klumpenhouwer network is a chord analyzed in terms of its dyadic sums and differences," and "this kind of analysis of triadic combinations was implicit in," his "concept of the cyclic set from the beginning", [2] cyclic sets being those "sets whose alternate elements unfold complementary cycles of a single interval." [3] It is named for the Canadian music theorist Henry Klumpenhouwer, a former doctoral student of David Lewin's.

Contents

Overview

Cyclic set (sum 9) from Berg's Lyric Suite Berg's Lyric Suite cyclic set.png
Cyclic set (sum 9) from Berg's Lyric Suite

"Klumpenhouwer's idea, both simple and profound in its implications, is to allow inversional, as well as transpositional, relations into networks like those of Figure 1," [1] showing an arrow down from B to F labeled T7, down from F to A labeled T3, and back up from A to B, labeled T10 which allows it to be represented by Figure 2a, for example, labeled I5, I3, and T2. [1] In Figure 4 this is (b) I7, I5, T2 and (c) I5, I3, T2.

Chord 1. K-net relations, inversional and transpositional, represented through arrows, letters, and numbers. Klumpenhouwer network inversion chord 2.png
Chord 1. K-net relations, inversional and transpositional, represented through arrows, letters, and numbers.
Chord 2. Inversional and transpositional K-net relations represented through arrows, letters, and numbers. K-net inversion.png
Chord 2. Inversional and transpositional K-net relations represented through arrows, letters, and numbers.
Chord 3. This chord with Chord 1 provide an example of rule #1 by way of a Network Isomorphism. [6] K-net inversion chord 3.png
Chord 3. This chord with Chord 1 provide an example of rule #1 by way of a Network Isomorphism. [6]

Lewin asserts the "recursive potential of K-network analysis" [4] ... "'in great generality: When a system modulates by an operation A, the transformation f' = A f A -inverse plays the structural role in the modulated system that f played in the original system." [5]

Given any network of pitch classes, and given any pc operation A, a second network may be derived from the first, and the relationship thereby derived 'network isomorphism' "arises between networks using analogous configurations of nodes and arrows to interpret pcsets that are of the same set class [6] – 'isomorphism of graphs'. Two graphs are isomorphic when they share the same structure of nodes-and-arrows, and when also the operations labeling corresponding arrows correspond under a particular sort of mapping f among T/I." [7]

"To generate isomorphic graphs, the mapping f must be what is called an automorphism of the T/I system. Networks that have isomorphic graphs are called isographic." [7]

To be isographic, two networks must have these features:

  1. They must have the same configuration of nodes and arrows.
  2. There must be some isomorphism F that maps the transformation-system used to label the arrows of one network, into the transformation-system used to label the arrows of the other.
  3. If the transformation X labels an arrow of the one network, then the transformation F(X) labels the corresponding arrow of the other."

"Two networks are positively isographic when they share the same configuration of nodes and arrows, when the T-numbers of corresponding arrows are equal, and when the I-numbers of corresponding arrows differ by some fixed number j mod 12." [7] "We call networks that contain identical graphs 'strongly isographic'". [8] "Let the family of transpositions and inversions on pitch classes be called 'the T/I group.'" [9]

"Any network can be retrograded by reversing all arrows and adjusting the transformations accordingly." [7]

Klumpenhouwer's [true] conjecture: "nodes (a) and (b), sharing the same configuration of arrows, will always be isographic if each T-number of Network (b) is the same as the corresponding T-number of Network (a), while each I-number of Network (b) is exactly j more than the corresponding I-number of Network (a), where j is some constant number modulo 12." [6]

Five Rules for Isography of Klumpenhouwer Networks:

  1. Klumpenhouwer Networks (a) and (b), sharing the same configuration of nodes and arrows, will be isographic under the circumstance that each T-number of Network (b) is the same as the corresponding T-number of Network (a), and each I-number of Network (b) is exactly j more than the corresponding I-number of Network (a). The pertinent automorphism of the T/I group is F(1,j): F(1,j)(Tn)=Tn; F(1,j)(In) = In+J.
  2. Klumpenhouwer Networks (a) and (b), will be isographic under the circumstance that each T-number of Network (b) is the complement of the corresponding T-number in Network (a), and each I-number of Network (b) is exactly j more than the complement of the corresponding I-number in Network (a)...F(11,j): F(11,j)(Tn)=T−n; F(11,j)(In)=I−n+j."
  3. Klumpenhouwer Networks (a) and (b), will be isographic under the circumstance each T-number of Network (b) is 5 times the corresponding T-number in Network (a), and each I-number of Network (b) is exactly j more than 5 times the corresponding I-number in Network (a)...F(5,j): F(5,j)(Tn)=T5n; F(5,j)(In)=I5n+j. [7]
  4. Klumpenhouwer Networks (a) and (b), will be isographic under the circumstance each T-number of Network (b) is 7 times the corresponding T-number in Network (a), and each I-number of Network (b) is exactly j more than 7 times the corresponding I-number in Network (a)...F(7,j): F(7,j)(Tn)=T7n; F(7,j)(In)=I7n+j.
  5. "Klumpenhouwer Networks (a) and (b), even if sharing the same configuration of nodes and arrows, will not be isographic under any other circumstances." [7]

"Any one of Klupmenhouwer's triadic networks may thus be understood as a segment of cyclic set, and the interpretations of these and of the 'networks of networks'...efficiently and economically represented in this way." [2]

If the graphs of chords are isomorphic by way of the appropriate F(u,j) operations, then they may be graphed as their own network. [10]

Graph of graphs from the six chords of Schoenberg's Pierrot lunaire, no. 4, mm. 13-14. K-net graph.png
Graph of graphs from the six chords of Schoenberg's Pierrot lunaire , no. 4, mm. 13–14.

Other terms include Lewin Transformational Network [11] and strongly isomorphic . [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steiner system</span> Block design in combinatorial mathematics

In combinatorial mathematics, a Steiner system is a type of block design, specifically a t-design with λ = 1 and t = 2 or (recently) t ≥ 2.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hypergraph</span> Generalization of graph theory

In mathematics, a hypergraph is a generalization of a graph in which an edge can join any number of vertices. In contrast, in an ordinary graph, an edge connects exactly two vertices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dynkin diagram</span> Pictorial representation of symmetry

In the mathematical field of Lie theory, a Dynkin diagram, named for Eugene Dynkin, is a type of graph with some edges doubled or tripled. Dynkin diagrams arise in the classification of semisimple Lie algebras over algebraically closed fields, in the classification of Weyl groups and other finite reflection groups, and in other contexts. Various properties of the Dynkin diagram correspond to important features of the associated Lie algebra.

This is a glossary of graph theory. Graph theory is the study of graphs, systems of nodes or vertices connected in pairs by lines or edges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Random graph</span> Graph generated by a random process

In mathematics, random graph is the general term to refer to probability distributions over graphs. Random graphs may be described simply by a probability distribution, or by a random process which generates them. The theory of random graphs lies at the intersection between graph theory and probability theory. From a mathematical perspective, random graphs are used to answer questions about the properties of typical graphs. Its practical applications are found in all areas in which complex networks need to be modeled – many random graph models are thus known, mirroring the diverse types of complex networks encountered in different areas. In a mathematical context, random graph refers almost exclusively to the Erdős–Rényi random graph model. In other contexts, any graph model may be referred to as a random graph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fano plane</span> Geometry with 7 points and 7 lines

In finite geometry, the Fano plane is a finite projective plane with the smallest possible number of points and lines: 7 points and 7 lines, with 3 points on every line and 3 lines through every point. These points and lines cannot exist with this pattern of incidences in Euclidean geometry, but they can be given coordinates using the finite field with two elements. The standard notation for this plane, as a member of a family of projective spaces, is PG(2, 2). Here, PG stands for "projective geometry", the first parameter is the geometric dimension and the second parameter is the order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klein quartic</span> Compact Riemann surface of genus 3

In hyperbolic geometry, the Klein quartic, named after Felix Klein, is a compact Riemann surface of genus 3 with the highest possible order automorphism group for this genus, namely order 168 orientation-preserving automorphisms, and 168 × 2 = 336 automorphisms if orientation may be reversed. As such, the Klein quartic is the Hurwitz surface of lowest possible genus; see Hurwitz's automorphisms theorem. Its (orientation-preserving) automorphism group is isomorphic to PSL(2, 7), the second-smallest non-abelian simple group after the alternating group A5. The quartic was first described in (Klein 1878b).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vertex (graph theory)</span> Fundamental unit of which graphs are formed

In discrete mathematics, and more specifically in graph theory, a vertex or node is the fundamental unit of which graphs are formed: an undirected graph consists of a set of vertices and a set of edges, while a directed graph consists of a set of vertices and a set of arcs. In a diagram of a graph, a vertex is usually represented by a circle with a label, and an edge is represented by a line or arrow extending from one vertex to another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incidence structure</span> Abstract mathematical system of two types of objects and a relation between them

In mathematics, an incidence structure is an abstract system consisting of two types of objects and a single relationship between these types of objects. Consider the points and lines of the Euclidean plane as the two types of objects and ignore all the properties of this geometry except for the relation of which points are on which lines for all points and lines. What is left is the incidence structure of the Euclidean plane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Circulant graph</span> Undirected graph acted on by a vertex-transitive cyclic group of symmetries

In graph theory, a circulant graph is an undirected graph acted on by a cyclic group of symmetries which takes any vertex to any other vertex. It is sometimes called a cyclic graph, but this term has other meanings.

String diagrams are a formal graphical language for representing morphisms in monoidal categories, or more generally 2-cells in 2-categories. They are a prominent tool in applied category theory. When interpreted in the monoidal category of vector spaces and linear maps with the tensor product, string diagrams are called tensor networks or Penrose graphical notation. This has led to the development of categorical quantum mechanics where the axioms of quantum theory are expressed in the language of monoidal categories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hoffman–Singleton graph</span> 7-regular undirected graph with 50 nodes and 175 edges

In the mathematical field of graph theory, the Hoffman–Singleton graph is a 7-regular undirected graph with 50 vertices and 175 edges. It is the unique strongly regular graph with parameters (50,7,0,1). It was constructed by Alan Hoffman and Robert Singleton while trying to classify all Moore graphs, and is the highest-order Moore graph known to exist. Since it is a Moore graph where each vertex has degree 7, and the girth is 5, it is a (7,5)-cage.

David Benjamin Lewin was an American music theorist, music critic and composer. Called "the most original and far-ranging theorist of his generation", he did his most influential theoretical work on the development of transformational theory, which involves the application of mathematical group theory to music.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transformational theory</span> Branch of music theory

Transformational theory is a branch of music theory developed by David Lewin in the 1980s, and formally introduced in his 1987 work, Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. The theory—which models musical transformations as elements of a mathematical group—can be used to analyze both tonal and atonal music.

In computing, a rose tree is a term for the value of a tree data structure with a variable and unbounded number of branches per node. The term is mostly used in the functional programming community, e.g., in the context of the Bird–Meertens formalism. Apart from the multi-branching property, the most essential characteristic of rose trees is the coincidence of bisimilarity with identity: two distinct rose trees are never bisimilar.

A signal-flow graph or signal-flowgraph (SFG), invented by Claude Shannon, but often called a Mason graph after Samuel Jefferson Mason who coined the term, is a specialized flow graph, a directed graph in which nodes represent system variables, and branches represent functional connections between pairs of nodes. Thus, signal-flow graph theory builds on that of directed graphs, which includes as well that of oriented graphs. This mathematical theory of digraphs exists, of course, quite apart from its applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Star (graph theory)</span> Tree graph with one central node and leaves of length 1

In graph theory, a starSk is the complete bipartite graph K1,k : a tree with one internal node and k leaves. Alternatively, some authors define Sk to be the tree of order k with maximum diameter 2; in which case a star of k > 2 has k − 1 leaves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directed graph</span> Graph with oriented edges

In mathematics, and more specifically in graph theory, a directed graph is a graph that is made up of a set of vertices connected by directed edges, often called arcs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neo-Riemannian theory</span>

Neo-Riemannian theory is a loose collection of ideas present in the writings of music theorists such as David Lewin, Brian Hyer, Richard Cohn, and Henry Klumpenhouwer. What binds these ideas is a central commitment to relating harmonies directly to each other, without necessary reference to a tonic. Initially, those harmonies were major and minor triads; subsequently, neo-Riemannian theory was extended to standard dissonant sonorities as well. Harmonic proximity is characteristically gauged by efficiency of voice leading. Thus, C major and E minor triads are close by virtue of requiring only a single semitonal shift to move from one to the other. Motion between proximate harmonies is described by simple transformations. For example, motion between a C major and E minor triad, in either direction, is executed by an "L" transformation. Extended progressions of harmonies are characteristically displayed on a geometric plane, or map, which portrays the entire system of harmonic relations. Where consensus is lacking is on the question of what is most central to the theory: smooth voice leading, transformations, or the system of relations that is mapped by the geometries. The theory is often invoked when analyzing harmonic practices within the Late Romantic period characterized by a high degree of chromaticism, including work of Schubert, Liszt, Wagner and Bruckner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Similarity (network science)</span>

Similarity in network analysis occurs when two nodes fall in the same equivalence class.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Lewin, David (1990). "Klumpenhouwer Networks and Some Isographies That Involve Them". Music Theory Spectrum . 12 (1 (Spring)): 83–120. doi:10.2307/746147.
  2. 1 2 Perle, George (1993). "Letter from George Perle", Music Theory Spectrum , vol. 15, no. 2 (Autumn), pp. 300–303.
  3. Perle, George (1996). Twelve-Tone Tonality, p. 21. ISBN   0-520-20142-6.
  4. Lewin, David (1994). "A Tutorial on Klumpenhouwer Networks, Using the Chorale in Schoenberg's Opus 11, No. 2". Journal of Music Theory . 38 (1 (Spring)): 79–101. doi:10.2307/843828.
  5. Lewin (1990), p. 86. quoting GMIT, p. 149.[ incomplete short citation ]
  6. 1 2 Lewin (1990), p. 87.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lewin (1990), p. 88.
  8. Lewin (1990, 84); Klumpenhouwer (1991, 329). cited in Klumpenhouwer (1994), p. 222.
  9. Lewin (1990, 86).
  10. 1 2 Lewin (1990, 92).
  11. Klumpenhouwer (1991), p. 320. citing David Lewin (1988), Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. (New Haven: Yale University Press), 154–244.
  12. Klupenhouwer (1991), p. 322.

Further reading