LGBTQ rights in North Dakota

Last updated

LGBTQ rights in North Dakota
Map of USA ND.svg
North Dakota (US)
Status Legal since 1973
Gender identity Transgender people no longer allowed to change legal gender since 2023
Discrimination protections Protections in employment for sexual orientation and gender identity
Family rights
Recognition of relationships Same-sex marriage since 2015
Adoption Same-sex couples allowed to adopt

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of North Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in North Dakota, and same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples; same-sex marriage has been legal since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges . State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

Contents

Laws regarding same-sex sexual activity

Prior to European settlement in the 18th and 19th centuries, there were no known legal or social punishments for engaging in homosexual activity. Perceptions toward gender and sexuality within Native American tribes both were and still are different than those of people from European descent. Several tribes have traditions of "third gender" people (also called "two-spirit") who perform tasks and wear clothes within the tribe that outsiders may consider to be gender non-conforming or incongruous with their primary or secondary sex characteristics. Among the Arikara, "male-bodied" people who "act as women" are known as skuxát . Likewise, the Hidatsa and the Mandan refer to them as miati and mihdeke , respectively, while they are known as wįktą , winkta and wíŋkte (or winkte) among the Assiniboine, the Dakota and the Lakota. [1]

The first criminal law against sodomy in North Dakota was enacted in 1862, then the Dakota Territory. It prohibited heterosexual and homosexual fellatio. The law was expanded in 1885 to include anal intercourse. [2] The state's vagrancy laws were expanded in 1903 to cover anyone whose speech or conduct was deemed to be "lewd, wanton and lascivious". [2] In State v. Nelson (1917), the North Dakota Supreme Court broadened the scope of the sodomy law to include acts of cunnilingus.

In 1927, a law initially designed to permit the sterilization of mentally and physically disabled inmates was expanded to include anyone who state authorities believed might be "habitual criminals, moral degenerates and sexual perverts". [2] The forced sterilization law was repealed in 1965.

In 1973, the state legalized private, adult, consensual homosexual relations as part of a larger revision of the Criminal Code that set the universal age of consent at eighteen years. [3]

Recognition of same-sex relationships

Same-sex marriage has been legal in North Dakota since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, which found the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional. The state had previously restricted marriage to the union of one man and one woman and denied recognition to same-sex unions under any legal designation both in its Constitution and by statute. [4] [5]

A lawsuit challenging the state's refusal to license and recognize same-sex marriages, Ramsay v. Dalrymple, was initiated in June 2014, but proceedings were suspended in January 2015 pending action by the U.S. Supreme Court in related cases. [6]

In August 2020, the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians legalized same-sex marriage within its reservation by a vote of 6–2; the first Native American tribal jurisdiction in North Dakota to do so. [7]

Adoption and parenting

North Dakota permits adoption by individuals and state law does not expressly ban LGBTQ people or same-sex couples from adopting or having custody of children. However, in the 1980s, the North Dakota Supreme Court ruled that because of societal prejudices, the sexual orientation of a parent would be the deciding factor in child custody cases. This ruling was subsequently reversed in 2003. [8]

North Dakota law expressly allows private adoption organizations in the state to discriminate against LGBT individuals or couples seeking to adopt children, if such discrimination is based on a sincerely held religious belief. [9]

Lesbian couples have access to assisted reproduction services, such as in vitro fertilization. State law recognizes the non-genetic, non-gestational mother as a legal parent to a child born via donor insemination, irrespective of the marital status of the parents. [10] In addition, North Dakota law explicitly permits gestational surrogacy. This statute also declares that a child born to a gestational surrogate is the child of the intended parents, whether same-sex or different-sex, for all intents and purposes. Traditional surrogacy is prohibited regardless of sexual orientation. [11]

Discrimination protections

Map of North Dakota cities that had sexual orientation and/or gender identity anti-employment discrimination ordinances prior to Bostock .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment Sexual orientation in public employment Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment1 1Since 2020 as a result of Bostock, discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment is outlawed throughout the state. North Dakota counties and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg
Map of North Dakota cities that had sexual orientation and/or gender identity anti–employment discrimination ordinances prior to Bostock
  Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment
  Sexual orientation in public employment
  Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment¹
¹Since 2020 as a result of Bostock, discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment is outlawed throughout the state.

North Dakota statutes do not explicitly address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [14]

Since 2001, the city of Fargo has had a non-discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation, but it only applies to city employees. A similar policy exists in Jamestown. The Human Rights Campaign added Bismarck and Mandan to this list in 2016 under its annual "Municipal Equality Index", though removed them in later versions of the index. [13]

On June 17, 2013, the Grand Forks City Council approved a measure to protect city employees and city job applicants from discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, becoming the second city in North Dakota to do so, and the first to address gender identity-based discrimination. [15] Later that year, the city became the first in North Dakota to ban discrimination in rental housing based on sexual orientation or gender identity. [16]

On February 17, 2015, the North Dakota Senate voted 25–22 to approve a bill that would have banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations. [17] The bill did not receive enough votes to pass in the House of Representatives.

In April 2021, Governor Doug Burgum signed a bill into law allowing student groups at colleges, universities and high schools to discriminate against LGBT students. Many public colleges and universities have policies requiring students organizations receiving financial support from the institution not to discriminate against students based on race, sex, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. These policies were upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2010 in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez . [18]

In March 2023, a bill formally passed the North Dakota Legislature to legally allow businesses to "refuse service on any grounds whatsoever" - based upon religious objective alone by an individual. The Governor of North Dakota is yet to either sign or veto the bill. [19]

Bostock v. Clayton County

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidated with Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda , and in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that discrimination in the workplace on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is discrimination on the basis of sex, and Title VII therefore protects LGBT employees from discrimination. [20] [21] [22]

Hate crime law

North Dakota law does not address hate crimes based on gender identity or sexual orientation. [23]

North Dakota does have a law that addresses hate or bias based crimes, but it does not address sexual orientation or gender identity. The Federal Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990 encouraged states to report hate crime data to the FBI. Fargo is the city responsible for reporting hate crimes to the state and federal governments. Studies have shown that 2 in 3 hate crimes go unreported. [24] This small knowledge of hate crimes may contribute to the lack of legislation in support of the LGBT community. Groups like the Human Rights Campaign, along with other organizations, are currently working with North Dakota law officials in order to modify the hate crime laws to be LGBT-inclusive. [25]

Although North Dakota's hate crime law does not protect LGBTQ people, U.S. federal law has addressed the categories of sexual orientation and gender identity since 2009, when the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama. [26] Hate crimes committed on the basis of the victim's sexual orientation or gender identity can be prosecuted in federal court.

Transgender rights

Identity documents

In May 2023, a bill passed the North Dakota Legislature banning transgender people from updating the gender marker on their birth record for any reason. [27]

The Department of Transportation will update the gender marker on a driver's license and state ID card upon receipt of a letter signed by a physician or therapist stating that the applicant has completed a permanent gender change. [28]

Gender-affirming care for minors

It is illegal to provide gender-affirming care to minors. On April 5, 2023, the state legislature passed a bill by a veto-proof majority. [29]

Athletics

In 2021, the North Dakota Legislature passed legislation to ban transgender girls from participating in girls school sport teams. The bill passed the House by a vote of 69–25 and the Senate by a vote 27–20. [30] [31] The Governor of North Dakota, Doug Burgum, vetoed the bill on April 21, 2021. Overriding the governor's veto would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers. [32] [33]

In April 2023, a pair of bills passed the state legislature and were signed into law by the Governor. These bills legally ban transgender individuals assigned male at birth from playing on female sports and athletics within North Dakota schools and higher education respectively. [34]

Pronouns

In March 2023, a bill passed the North Dakota Legislature that would have banned the use of preferred gender pronouns for trans people within all state-run schools and classrooms without explicit approval of the student's parent or guardian and school administration. The Governor of North Dakota formally vetoed the bill. [35] [36] [37] Another bill in May with amendments attached (via committee) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor. This bill forbids schools and government entities from requiring (or prohibiting) the use of preferred pronouns. It also requires the disclosure and outing of transgender students to their parents within state-run schools. It went into effect July 1. [27]

Bathroom bans

In April 2023, a bill passed both houses of the North Dakota Legislature and was signed into law by the Governor of North Dakota explicitly allowing transgender individuals' public bathroom usage to be restricted in many North Dakota state-run facilities. It went into effect July 1. [38]

Politics

In July 2020, the North Dakotan Republican delegates voted in favor of the party's 2020 election platform. [39] The platform opposes absolutely any civil rights protections for LGBTQ people, while accusing transgender people "of preying on women" and LGBTQ people of "recruiting children". Many Republican delegates condemned the platform. [40] Republican Governor Doug Burgum also opposed the anti-gay platform, calling it "divisive and divisional", and saying, "As I've long said, all North Dakotans deserve to be treated equally and live free of discrimination". [41]

Carrie Evans was elected to the Minot City Council in June 2020 and is the first openly lesbian to hold elected office in the state. [42] In 2012, Joshua Boschee became the first openly gay man to be elected to the North Dakota House of Representatives. In 2015, Representative Randy Boehning was outed as bisexual, after having voted against an LGBT rights bill in the House.

Conversion therapy laws

In June 2021, a policy was adopted in committee within North Dakota from a regulation (which does not require legislative approval) - to legally ban conversion therapy by social workers, psychologists and councilors with their clients and/or hosts. [43]

Public opinion

A 2022 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) opinion poll found that 66% of North Dakota residents supported same-sex marriage, while 34% opposed it and 1% were unsure. The same poll also found that 78% of North Dakota residents supported an anti-discrimination law covering sexual orientation and gender identity, while 22% were opposed. Additionally, 58% were against allowing businesses to refuse to serve gay and lesbian people due to religious beliefs, while 41% supported allowing such religiously-based refusals. [44]

Public opinion for LGBTQ anti-discrimination laws in North Dakota
Poll sourceDate(s)
administered		Sample
size		Margin of
error		 % support % opposition % no opinion
Public Religion Research Institute January 2-December 30, 2019 182 ?71%21%8%
Public Religion Research Institute January 3-December 30, 2018 187 ?72%20%7%
Public Religion Research Institute April 5-December 23, 2017 247 ?58%29%13%
Public Religion Research Institute April 29, 2015-January 7, 2016 276 ?60%36%4%

Summary table

Same-sex sexual activity legal Yes check.svg (Since 1973) [2]
Equal age of consent Yes check.svg [45]
Anti-discrimination laws for sexual orientation Yes check.svg (In employment AND housing and public accommodations since harm date of June 15, 2020 (in adherence to the Bostock Decision), as determined by North Dakota Department of Labor and Human Rights)
Anti-discrimination laws for gender identity or expression Yes check.svg (In employment AND housing and public accommodations since harm date of June 15, 2020 (in adherence to the Bostock Decision), as determined by North Dakota Department of Labor and Human Rights)
Same-sex marriages Yes check.svg (Since 2015)
Stepchild and joint adoption by same-sex couples Yes check.svg [46]
Lesbian, gay and bisexual people allowed to serve openly in the military Yes check.svg (Since 2011)
Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military Yes check.svg (Since 2021) [47]
Intersex people allowed to serve openly in the military X mark.svg (Current DoD policy bans "hermaphrodites" from serving or enlisting in the military) [48]
Right to change legal gender Yes check.svg (Requires sex reassignment surgery) [49]
Gay panic defense abolished Yes check.svg
Conversion therapy banned on minors X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (Since 2021 - in some circumstances only, such as social workers on their clients) [43]
Access to IVF for lesbian couples Yes check.svg
Surrogacy arrangements legal for gay male couples Yes check.svg (Gestational surrogacy contracts recognized)
MSMs allowed to donate blood X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (Since 2020; 3-month deferral period) [50]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Utah</span>

The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Utah have significantly evolved in the 21st century. Protective laws have become increasingly enacted since 2014, despite the state's reputation as socially conservative and highly religious. Utah's anti-sodomy law was invalidated in 2003 by Lawrence v. Texas, and fully repealed by the state legislature in 2019. Same-sex marriage has been legal since the state's ban was ruled unconstitutional by federal courts in 2014. In addition, statewide anti-discrimination laws now cover sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing, and the use of conversion therapy on minors is prohibited. In spite of this, there are still a few differences between the treatment of LGBTQ people and the rest of the population, and the rights of transgender youth are restricted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Nevada</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Nevada enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex marriage has been legal since October 8, 2014, due to the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Sevcik v. Sandoval. Same-sex couples may also enter a domestic partnership status that provides many of the same rights and responsibilities as marriage. However, domestic partners lack the same rights to medical coverage as their married counterparts and their parental rights are not as well defined. Same-sex couples are also allowed to adopt, and state law prohibits unfair discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, among other categories, in employment, housing and public accommodations. In addition, conversion therapy on minors is outlawed in the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wyoming</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wyoming may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Wyoming since 1977, and same-sex marriage was legalized in the state in October 2014. Wyoming statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, the cities of Jackson, Casper, and Laramie have enacted ordinances outlawing discrimination in housing and public accommodations that cover sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Louisiana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Louisiana may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Louisiana as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized in the state since June 2015 as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in New Jersey</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Jersey have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT individuals in New Jersey enjoy strong protections from discrimination, and have had the same marriage rights as heterosexual people since October 21, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Georgia (U.S. state)</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Georgia enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBTQ rights in the state have been a recent occurrence, with most improvements occurring from the 2010s onward. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1998, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since 2015, in accordance with Obergefell v. Hodges. In addition, the state's largest city Atlanta, has a vibrant LGBTQ community and holds the biggest Pride parade in the Southeast. The state's hate crime laws, effective since June 26, 2020, explicitly include sexual orientation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in New York</span>

The U.S. state of New York has generally been seen as socially liberal in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) rights. LGBT travel guide Queer in the World states, "The fabulosity of Gay New York is unrivaled on Earth, and queer culture seeps into every corner of its five boroughs". The advocacy movement for LGBT rights in the state has been dated as far back as 1969 during the Stonewall riots in New York City. Same-sex sexual activity between consenting adults has been legal since the New York v. Onofre case in 1980. Same-sex marriage has been legal statewide since 2011, with some cities recognizing domestic partnerships between same-sex couples since 1998. Discrimination protections in credit, housing, employment, education, and public accommodation have explicitly included sexual orientation since 2003 and gender identity or expression since 2019. Transgender people in the state legally do not have to undergo sex reassignment surgery to change their sex or gender on official documents since 2014. In addition, both conversion therapy on minors and the gay and trans panic defense have been banned since 2019. Since 2021, commercial surrogacy has been legally available within New York State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wisconsin</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wisconsin enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. However, the transgender community may face some legal issues not experienced by cisgender residents, due in part to discrimination based on gender identity not being included in Wisconsin's anti-discrimination laws, nor is it covered in the state's hate crime law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Wolf v. Walker. Discrimination based on sexual orientation is banned statewide in Wisconsin, and sexual orientation is a protected class in the state's hate crime laws. It approved such protections in 1982, making it the first state in the United States to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Pennsylvania</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Pennsylvania. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Pennsylvania was the final Mid-Atlantic state without same-sex marriage, indeed lacking any form of same-sex recognition law until its statutory ban was overturned on May 20, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in North Carolina</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of North Carolina may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents, or LGBT residents of other states with more liberal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arkansas</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arkansas face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arkansas. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9, 2014, subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Nonetheless, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity was not banned in Arkansas until the Supreme Court banned it nationwide in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arizona</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt. Nevertheless, the state provides only limited protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Several cities, including Phoenix and Tucson, have enacted ordinances to protect LGBTQ people from unfair discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Indiana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Indiana have been shaped by both state and federal law. These evolved from harsh penalties established early in the state's history to the decriminalization of same-sex activity in 1977 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2014. Indiana was subject to an April 2017 federal court ruling that discrimination based on sexual orientation is tantamount to discrimination on account of "sex", as defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ruling establishes sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in the workplace, forbidding unfair discrimination, although Indiana state statutes do not include sexual orientation or gender identity among its categories of discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Virginia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Virginia enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT rights in the state are a relatively recent occurrence; with most improvements in LGBT rights occurring in the 2000s and 2010s. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Bostic v. Rainey. Effective July 1, 2020, there is a state-wide law protecting LGBT persons from discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and credit. The state's hate crime laws also now explicitly include both sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in South Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Dakota, and same-sex marriages have been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Nebraska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Nebraska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Nebraska, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. The state prohibits discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County and a subsequent decision of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. In addition, the state's largest city, Omaha, has enacted protections in public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kentucky</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity in Kentucky has been legally permitted since 1992, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is legal in Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and all other same-sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kansas</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kansas have federal protections, but many face some legal challenges on the state level that are not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kansas under the US Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws that only apply to same-sex sexual acts. The state has prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations since 2020. Proposed bills restricting preferred gender identity on legal documents, bans on transgender people in women's sports, bathroom use restrictions, among other bills were vetoed numerous times by Democratic Governor Laura Kelly since 2021. However, many of Kelly's vetoes were overridden by the Republican supermajority in the Kansas legislature and became law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Alaska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Alaska have evolved significantly over the years. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBTQ people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Mississippi</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Mississippi face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. LGBT rights in Mississippi are limited in comparison to other states. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Mississippi as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. The state capital Jackson and a number of other cities provide protections in housing and public accommodations as well.

References

  1. ↑ Sabine Lang, Men as Women, Women as Men ISBN   0292777957, 2010
  2. 1 2 3 4 "The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - North Dakota". www.glapn.org. Archived from the original on 2011-10-04. Retrieved 2011-07-29.
  3. ↑ William N. Eskridge, Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861-2003 (NY: Penguin Group, 2008), 201n, available online Archived 2016-05-21 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2010
  4. ↑ CNN: 2004 Ballot Measures Archived 2013-09-06 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2011
  5. ↑ Human Resources Campaign: North Dakota Marriage/Relationship Recognition Law Archived 2012-03-11 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2011
  6. ↑ "Judge puts marriage case on hold pending high court ruling". Houston Chronicle. Associated Press. January 20, 2015. Archived from the original on January 21, 2015. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
  7. ↑ Hatton, Faith (August 7, 2020). "Turtle Mountain votes to recognize same-sex marriage". KFYR. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved August 8, 2020.
  8. ↑ North Dakota Adoption Law Archived 2012-07-25 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2011
  9. ↑ Lang, Nico (September 26, 2018). "'Religious Freedom' Adoption Bill Allowing Discrimination Against LGBTQ Couples Is Dead". INTO. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  10. ↑ "North Dakota's equality profile". Movement Advancement Project. Archived from the original on 2020-02-03. Retrieved 2020-02-10.
  11. ↑ "Gestational Surrogacy in North Dakota". Creative Family Connections. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
  12. ↑ "North Dakota". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on 2018-09-05. Retrieved 2019-03-12.
  13. 1 2 "Municipal Equality Index 2016" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-07-03. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  14. ↑ Human Resources Campaign: North Dakota Non-Discrimination Law Archived 2012-03-11 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2011
  15. ↑ "Grand Forks: First in N.D. to add protections for LGBT city workers". June 17, 2013. Archived from the original on June 21, 2013. Retrieved June 19, 2013.
  16. ↑ Jewett, Brandi (October 21, 2013). "Grand Forks becomes first city to pass gay discrimination ban for rental housing". The City Street Beat. Grand Forks Herald . Archived from the original on October 23, 2013. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  17. ↑ MacPherson, James (17 February 2015). "North Dakota Senate approves LGBT‑inclusive anti-discrimination bill". AP. Archived from the original on 20 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  18. ↑ Ronan, Wyatt (April 19, 2021). "North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum Signs Anti-LGBTQ House Bill 1503 Into Law". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on April 21, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  19. ↑ "License to Discriminate: Human Rights Campaign Condemns North Dakota Senate for Advancing Dangerous Religious Refusal Bill, Urges Governor Burgum to Veto Legislation Warping Definition of Religious Freedom". 27 March 2023.
  20. ↑ Biskupic, Joan (June 16, 2020). "Two conservative justices joined decision expanding LGBTQ rights". CNN. Archived from the original on June 19, 2020. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  21. ↑ "US Supreme Court backs protection for LGBT workers". BBC News. June 15, 2020. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  22. ↑ Liptak, Adam (June 15, 2020). "Civil Rights Law Protects Gay and Transgender Workers, Supreme Court Rules". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020. Retrieved June 21, 2020.
  23. ↑ Human Resources Campaign: North Dakota Hate Crimes Law Archived 2012-03-11 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 10, 2011
  24. ↑ Study Findings CBS News: Nearly 2 in 3 hate crimes unreported, Justice Department study finds Archived 2015-12-05 at the Wayback Machine , accessed October 26, 2015
  25. ↑ Human Rights Campaign: North Dakota Archived 2015-10-20 at the Wayback Machine , accessed October 26, 2015
  26. ↑ "Obama signs hate crimes bill into law". CNN . October 28, 2009. Archived from the original on March 8, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  27. 1 2 "Human Rights Campaign: "Instead of Helping North Dakotans to 'Find the Good Life,' Governor Burgum Decided to Sign Away the Ability for Transgender People to Safely and Openly Exist"". 9 May 2023.
  28. ↑ "North Dakota". National Center for Transgender Equality. Archived from the original on October 19, 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
  29. ↑ Ahmed, Trisha (2023-04-05). "North Dakota advances suite of restrictions on trans rights". AP NEWS. Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  30. ↑ "North Dakota lawmakers send transgender athlete ban to governor to sign into law". Metro Weekly. April 16, 2021. Archived from the original on April 17, 2021. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
  31. ↑ "North Dakota Senate sends transgender athlete bill to governor's desk". INFORUM. 15 April 2021. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
  32. ↑ "North Dakota governor vetoes bill restricting transgender athletes". The Dickinson Press. 21 April 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2021-04-22.
  33. ↑ Selbe, Nick. "North Dakota Governor Vetoes Trans Sports Ban Bill". Sports Illustrated. Archived from the original on 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2021-04-22.
  34. ↑ "North Dakota governor signs trans sports bans after vetoing them in past years". 12 April 2023.
  35. ↑ "North Dakota governor vetoes bill restricting transgender students' pronouns". 30 March 2023.
  36. ↑ "North Dakota governor vetoes transgender pronouns bill". Associated Press . 30 March 2023.
  37. ↑ "North Dakota House passes school gender pronoun prohibition - CBS Minnesota". CBS News . 22 March 2023.
  38. ↑ "ICYMI: Governor Doug Burgum Signs Discriminatory Bathroom Bill into Law, Inviting More Instances of Harassment and Violence Against Transgender North Dakotans". 27 April 2023.
  39. ↑ Bollinger, Alex (July 23, 2020). "North Dakota GOP platform says LGBTQ people "recruit" children & "prey" on women". LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2020.
  40. ↑ "North Dakota GOP director apologizes after party approves anti-LGBT rhetoric in policy statements". Inforum.com. July 23, 2020. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2020.
  41. ↑ Macpherson, James (July 23, 2020). "North Dakota Governor Blasts Party's Anti-LGBTQ Resolution". US News. Archived from the original on 2022-01-05. Retrieved 2020-08-05.
  42. ↑ Port, Rob (September 11, 2020). "Minot city councilwoman unloads on anti-gay citizen: "I'm not paying an heed to your crap"". inforum. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved September 13, 2020.
  43. 1 2 John Riley (18 June 2021). "North Dakota approves rule barring social workers from subjecting clients to conversion therapy". Metroweekly.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-28. Retrieved 2022-01-05.
  44. ↑ Public opinion on LGBT people by state: North Dakota PRRI – American Values Atlas.
  45. ↑ "North Dakota Age of Consent Laws 2019". ageofconsent.net. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
  46. ↑ "LGBT Adoption Laws North Dakota". lifelongadoptions.com. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
  47. ↑ Baldor, Lolita; Miller, Zeke (January 25, 2021). "Biden reverses Trump ban on transgender people in military". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on January 29, 2021. Retrieved January 26, 2021.
  48. ↑ "Medical Conditions That Can Keep You From Joining the Military". Military.com. 10 May 2021. Archived from the original on 30 January 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
  49. ↑ North Dakota Archived 2018-10-19 at the Wayback Machine , National Center for Transgender Equality
  50. ↑ McNamara, Audrey (April 2, 2020). "FDA eases blood donation requirements for gay men amid "urgent" shortage". CBS News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.