Part of a series on |
LGBTQ rights |
---|
Lesbian ∙ Gay ∙ Bisexual ∙ Transgender ∙ Queer |
LGBTQ portal |
Part of a series on |
LGBTQ topics |
---|
LGBTQ portal |
Same-sex adoption is the adoption of children by same-sex couples. It may take the form of a joint adoption by the couple, or of the adoption by one partner of the other's biological child (stepchild adoption).
Joint adoption by same-sex couples is permitted in 39 countries. Most countries and territories that allow same-sex marriage (exceptions being Aruba, Curaçao, Ecuador and several Mexican states), as well as several countries and dependent territories that do not (Bolivia, Croatia, Israel and two UK territories of Bermuda and the Cayman Islands) allow for same-sex joint adoption. In some of the countries with marriage, legislation for adoption preceded that for marriage.
Adoption is only permitted for same sex married couples in 21 of the 31 Mexican states and Mexico City, despite a Supreme Court ruling that requires states to allow it. Stepchild adoption is permitted for same-sex couples in two countries without same-sex marriage - San Marino and Czechia permits step-child adoption in which the registered partner can adopt the biological and, in some cases, the adopted child of his or her partner.
Given that constitutions and statutes usually do not address the adoption rights of LGBT persons, judicial decisions often determine whether they can serve as parents either individually or as couples. Opponents of adoption by same-sex couples have argued that LGBT parenting adversely affects children. However, research consistently shows that gay and lesbian parents are as fit and capable as heterosexual parents, and their children are as psychologically healthy and well-adjusted as those reared by heterosexual parents. [1] [2] [3]
Same-sex parents pursuing adoption must also contend with social pressures to conform to heteronormative gender roles. [4] The concept of gender role models is necessitated by the bureaucratic organization of foster care and adoption agencies, particularly in the United States. [5]
The existing body of research on outcomes for children with LGBT parents includes limited studies that consider the specific case of adoption. Moreover, where studies do mention adoption they often fail to distinguish between outcomes for unrelated children versus those in their original family or step-families, causing research on the more general case of LGBT parenting to be used to counter the claims of LGBT-adoption opponents. [6] One study has addressed the question directly, evaluating the outcomes of adoptees less than 3-years old who had been placed in one of 56 lesbian and gay households since infancy. Despite the small sample, and the fact that the children have yet to become aware of their adoption status or the dynamics of gender development, the study found no significant associations between parental sexual orientation and child adjustment. [4]
Scientific research indicates that the children of same-sex couples fare just as well as the children of opposite-sex couples. [7]
In 1979, Reverend John Kuiper of the Metropolitan Community Church and his husband became the first gay men in America to win the right to adopt a child. [5] [8]
The adoption of children by LGBT people is an issue of active debate. In the United States, for example, legislation to prevent adoption by LGBT people has been introduced in many jurisdictions; such efforts have largely been defeated. Prior to 1973, state courts commonly barred gay and lesbian individuals from holding a parenting role, especially through adoption. [9]
Major professional organizations have made statements in defense of adoption by same-sex couples. The American Psychological Association has supported adoption by same-sex couples, citing social prejudice as harming the psychological health of lesbians and gays while noting there is no evidence that their parenting causes harm. [10] [11] [12] [13] The American Medical Association has issued a similar position supporting second parent adoption by same-sex partner, stating that lack of formal recognition can cause health-care disparities for children of same-sex parents. [14]
The following arguments are made in support of adoption by LGBT parents:
Country | Pollster | Year | For | Against | Don't Know/Neutral/No answer/Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | Eurobarometer | 2023 | 65% [29] | 30% | 5% |
Belgium | Ipsos | 2021 | 72% [30] | 21% | 7% |
Bulgaria | Eurobarometer | 2006 | 12% [31] | 68% [31] | 20% [31] |
Cyprus | Eurobarometer | 2006 | 10% [31] | 86% [31] | 4% [31] |
Czech Republic | CVVM | 2019 | 47% [32] | 47% | 6% |
Denmark | Pew Research Center | 2017 | 75% [33] | - | - |
Estonia | HumanrightsEE | 2023 | 47% [34] | 44% [34] | 9% [34] |
Finland | Taloustutkimus | 2013 | 51% [35] | 42% [35] | 7% [35] |
France | Ipsos | 2021 | 62% [30] | 29% | 10% |
Germany | Ipsos | 2021 | 69% [30] | 24% | 6% |
Greece | KAPA Research | 2023 | 53% [36] | 41% [36] | 6% [36] |
Hungary | Ipsos | 2021 | 59% [30] | 36% | 5% |
Ireland | Red C Poll | 2011 | 60% [37] | - | - |
Italy | Eurispes | 2023 | 50.4% [38] | 49.6% | 0% |
Latvia | SKDS | 2023 | 27% [39] | 23% [39] | 46% [39] |
Lithuania | Eurobarometer | 2006 | 12% [31] | 82% [31] | 6% [31] |
Luxembourg | Politmonitor | 2013 | 55% [40] | 44% [40] | 1% [40] |
Malta | Misco | 2014 | 20% [41] | 80% [41] | - |
Netherlands | Ipsos | 2021 | 83% [30] | 12% | 5% |
Norway | YouGov | 2012 | 54% [42] | 34% [42] | 12% [42] |
Poland | Ipsos | 2021 | 33% [30] | 58% | 10% |
Portugal | Pew Research Center | 2017 | 59% [43] | 28% [43] | 13% [43] |
Romania | Eurobarometer | 2006 | 8% [31] | 82% [31] | 10% [31] |
Russia | Ipsos | 2021 | 23% [30] | 67% | 10% |
Serbia | Civil Rights Defenders | 2020 | 22.5% [44] | - | - |
Slovakia | Eurobarometer | 2006 | 12% [31] | 84% [31] | 4% [31] |
Slovenia | Delo Stik | 2015 | 38% [45] | 55% [45] | 7% [45] |
Spain | Ipsos | 2021 | 77% [30] | 17% | 6% |
Sweden | Ipsos | 2021 | 79% [30] | 17% | 4% |
Switzerland | Pink Cross | 2020 | 67% [46] | 30% [46] | 3% [46] |
Ukraine | Gay Alliance of Ukraine | 2013 | 7% [47] | 68% [47] | 12% 13% would allow some exceptions [47] |
United Kingdom | Ipsos | 2021 | 72% [30] | 19% | 9% |
Country | Pollster | Year | For | Against | Don't Know/Neutral/No answer/Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Ipsos | 2023 | 71% [48] | 24% | 6% |
Brazil | Ipsos | 2023 | 69% [48] | 22% | 9% |
Canada | Ipsos | 2023 | 74% [48] | 17% | 9% |
Chile | CADEM | 2022 | 70% [49] | 28% | 2% |
Colombia | Ipsos | 2023 | 53% [48] | 40% | 7% |
Mexico | Ipsos | 2023 | 60% [48] | 34% | 6% |
Peru | Ipsos | 2023 | 51% [48] | 42% | 7% |
United States | Ipsos | 2023 | 64% [48] | 26% | 10% |
Uruguay | Equipos Consultores | 2013 | 52% [50] | 39% | 9% |
Venezuela | Equilibrium Cende | 2023 | 48% [51] (55%) | 39% (45%) | 13% |
Country | Pollster | Year | For | Against | Don't Know/Neutral/No answer/Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia | Ipsos | 2021 | 71% [52] | 21% | 8% |
New Zealand | Research New Zealand | 2012 | 64% [53] | 31% | 5% |
Country | Pollster | Year | For | Against | Don't Know/Neutral/No answer/Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | Ipsos | 2021 | 66% [54] | 30% | 4% |
India | Ipsos | 2021 | 66% [54] | 21% | 13% |
Israel | Midgam Institute | 2017 | 60% [55] | - | - |
Japan | Ipsos | 2021 | 68% [54] | 20% | 13% |
Malaysia | Ipsos | 2021 | 24% [54] | 65% | 11% |
Russia | Ipsos | 2021 | 23% [54] | 67% | 10% |
South Korea | Ipsos | 2021 | 46% [54] | 45% | 9% |
Turkey | Ipsos | 2021 | 39% [54] | 44% | 18% |
Country | Pollster | Year | For [a] | Against [a] | Neither [b] | Margin of error | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kenya | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 9% | 90% | 1% | ±3.6% | [56] |
Nigeria | Pew Research Center | 2023 | 2% | 97% | 1% | ±3.6% | [57] |
South Africa | Ipsos | 2023 | 57% (66%) | 29% [10% support some rights] (34%) | 14% | ±3.5% [c] | [56] |
Pew Research Center | 2023 | 38% | 58% | 4% | ±3.6% | [57] |
Joint adoption by same-sex couples is legal in the following 39 countries, Mexico in some states:
Joint adoption by same-sex couples is legal in the following subnational jurisdictions or dependent territories:
The following countries permit step-child adoption in which the partner in a relationship can adopt the natural and/or the adopted child of his or her partner:
Step-child adoption is legal in the following subnational jurisdictions or dependent territories:
In Italy step-child adoption can only be recognized by court order since 2016. [132]
South Africa is the only African country to allow joint adoption by same-sex couples. The 2002 decision of the Constitutional Court in the case of Du Toit v Minister of Welfare and Population Development amended the Child Care Act, 1983 to allow both joint adoption and step-parent adoption by "permanent same-sex life partners". [133] The Child Care Act has since been replaced by the Children's Act, 2005, which allows joint adoption by "partners in a permanent domestic life-partnership", whether same- or opposite-sex, and step-parent adoption by a person who is the "permanent domestic life-partner" of the child's current parent. [134] Same-sex marriage has been legal since 2006, and is equivalent to opposite-sex marriage for all purposes, including adoption. [135]
Argentina allows adoption by same and different-sex marriages, and even by single people, since 2010. The law makes no difference in the requirements for adoption for any of these. [136]
Canada has no nation-wide law legalizing same-sex adoption, but rather has smaller provincial laws that cover the entire nation. Same-sex adoption legalization in Canada began with British Columbia in 1996 and was finalized with Nunavut in 2011. [137] [138] By 2013, an Ipsos Global poll showed 70% of Canadians approved of same-sex adoption to some degree with 45% strongly approving. [139]
Since March 10, 2022 joint parenthood of same-sex couples is legal in Chile after the entry into force of Law 21,400 on Equal Marriage, which explicitly guarantees non-discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity for custody purposes, filiation and adoption whether or not the couples are married or whether or not they had their children through assisted human fertilization. The law amends the Civil Code to recognize the parents of children as their mother and/or father, their two mothers, or their two fathers. [140]
A 2021 survey, shows that 65% of Chileans support same-sex adoption. [141]
On 4 November 2015, in a 6-2 Constitutional Court ruling, Colombia decided to allow adoption by LGBT peoples. [142] The ruling came before same-sex marriage became legal in the country on 28 April 2016. [143]
Cuba allows adoption by same-sex marriages (since September 2022 referendum) and different-sex marriages, and even by single people.
As of May 2019, the Honduras Supreme Court is expected to rule on a decision regarding both same-sex marriage and adoption. [144]
Same-sex couples are able to adopt in Mexico City (since 2010), Coahuila (2014), Campeche (2016), Colima (2016), Michoacán (2016), Morelos (2016), Veracruz (2016), Baja California (2017), Chihuahua (2017), Querétaro (2017), Puebla (2018), Chiapas (2018), Nayarit (2019), Aguascalientes (2019), Hidalgo (2019), San Luis Potosí (2019), Quintana Roo (2022), Yucatan (2022), Durango (2022), Tamaulipas (2022), Guerrero (2022), Nuevo Leon (2023), Tabasco (2024).
In Mexico City, the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District passed legislation on 21 December 2009 enabling same-sex couples to adopt children. [145] Eight days later, Head of Government ("Mayor") Marcelo Ebrard signed the bill into law, which officially took effect on 4 March 2010. [119] [146]
On 24 November 2011, the Coahuila Supreme Court struck down the state's law barring same-sex couples from adopting, urging the state's legislature to amend the adoption law as soon as possible. [147] On 12 February 2014, the state's congress overwhelmingly approved the measure more than two years following the supreme court decision. [117]
On 3 February 2017 the SCJN emitted tesis 08/2017 in which it is stated that the family of the LGBT community doesn't end with a couple, but that it also extends onto the right to have and raise children. Therefore, LGBT couples wishing to form a family and adopt children will be legally protected and can't be limited by any governmental entity. [148]
In October 2021, a bill was introduced to the legislature of Baja California Sur. [149]
In September 2022, a bill was passed in Quintana Roo. [123]
Adoption by LGBT individuals or same-sex couples is legal in all fifty states as of June 2017.
A government-sponsored adoption law in Uruguay allowing LGBT adoption was approved by the lower house on 28 August 2009, and by the Senate on 9 September 2009. In October 2009, the law was signed by President and took effect. [104] According to Equipos Mori Poll's, 53% of Uruguayans are opposed to same sex adoption against 39% that support it. Interconsult's Poll made in 2008 says that 49% are opposed to same sex adoption against 35% that support it. [103] [150]
LGBT rights for adoption of children in Asia are almost nonexistent, except in Israel, Thailand (TBD) and Taiwan. Some Asian countries still criminalize same-sex activities and do not have anti-discrimination laws, which are obstacles for legislating for LGBT adoption. [151]
The issue of same-sex adoption has been the subject of a long-running political and legal battle in Israel that was resolved in December 2023, when the Israeli Supreme Court interpreted existing law to allow same-sex adoptions, as the law gives absolute priority to the welfare of the child and not to the gender of its parents. [152] [153]
Until 2023, members of same-sex couples could only adopt the biological child of their spouse (so-called stepchild adoptions). Taiwan law allowed for opposite-sex married people to jointly adopt, and also allowed single individuals to adopt, depending on the circumstances, including individual LGBT people. The same-sex marriage law only granted same-sex couples the right to adopt children genetically related to one of the spouses. [154]
In February 2006, France's Court of Cassation ruled that both partners in a same-sex relationship can have parental rights over one partner's biological child. The result came from a case where a woman tried to give parental rights of her two daughters to her partner, with whom she was in a civil union. [155] In the case of adoption, however, in February 2007, the same court ruled against a lesbian couple where one partner tried to adopt the child of the other partner. The court stated that the woman's partner cannot be recognized unless the mother withdrew her own parental rights. [156] [157] On 17 May 2013, French President François Hollande signed into law the bill that opened marriage and adoption rights linked to it for same sex couples. [158]
In 1998, a nursery school teacher from Lons-le-Saunier, living as a couple with another woman, had applied for an authorization to adopt a child from the département (local government) of Jura. The adoption board recommended against the authorization because the child would lack a paternal reference, and thus the president of the département ruled against the authorization. [159] The case was appealed before the administrative courts and ended before the Council of State, acting as supreme administrative court, which ruled against the woman. [160] The European Court of Human Rights concluded that these actions and this ruling were a violation of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights taken in conjunction with Article 8. [159] [161]
On 2 June 2006, the Icelandic Parliament unanimously passed a proposal accepting adoption, parenting and assisted insemination treatment for same-sex couples on the same basis as heterosexual couples. The law went into effect on 27 June 2006.
In Bulgaria, according to the Ministry of Justice the laws regarding adoption "lack a norm, concerning the sexual orientation of the individuals". Therefore, a single gay person or same-sex couples may adopt. [162] [163]
On 17 May 2013, the Portuguese parliament approved a bill in first reading allowing "co-adoption" of the biological or adopted child of the same-sex spouse or partner, where that spouse or partner is the only legally recognized parent of the child (e.g. the mother with the natural father not being registered). However, in October 2013 members of parliament opposed to the bill proposed a referendum on the issue and killed a motion to have the second vote in the plenary; [164] [165] the motion on the possible referendum was then considered, [166] but the Constitutional Court declared it unconstitutional. [167] On 14 March 2014, the original bill was rejected in second reading. [165] On 20 November 2015, 5 proposals from several left-wing parties were voted favourably by the new parliament as result of 4 October General Elections. [165]
In July 2014 through Life Partnership Act Croatia recognized an institution similar to step-child adoption called partner-guardian. A partner who is not a biological parent of a child can share parental responsibilities with a biological parent or parents if they agree to it, or if the court decides it is in the best interest of a child. Additionally, a biological parent or parents can temporarily give a partner who is not a biological parent full parental responsibilities. A partner who is not a biological parent can also gain permanent parental responsibilities through an institution of partner-guardian if both biological parents of a child have died, or exceptionally if a second biological parent of a child is unknown, and if the court decides it is in the best interest of a child. [168]
In January 2015, the Constitutional Court of Austria found the existing laws on adoption to be unconstitutional and ordered the laws to be changed by 31 December 2015 to allow joint adoption by same-sex couples in Austria. [169] [170]
On 6 April 2015, the Children and Family Relationships Bill 2015 passed by Parliament in March 2015 which extends full adoption rights to cohabiting couples and those in civil partnerships was promulgated by the President of Ireland. The law went into effect a year later on 6 April 2016. [171] [172] [173] [174]
On 20 November 2015 the Portuguese Parliament approved; by 141 votes against 87 with 2 abstentions; a diploma presented by all the parties (except the right-wing PàF) to allow same-sex adoption. On 26 January 2016, the conservative Portuguese President Aníbal Cavaco Silva vetoed the bill and a week later the Portuguese Parliament overridden the veto. The law went into effect on 1 March 2016. [175] [176] [177]
On 22 June 2016 the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation upheld a lower court's decision to approve a request for a lesbian to adopt her partner's daughter. Prosecutors had appealed against the decision by the Rome court of appeal. Decisions by the supreme court set a precedent. [178]
In December 2020, Hungary explicitly legally banned adoption for same-sex couples within its constitution. [179] [180]
In April 2021, a court in Croatia ruled that same-sex partners have the right to adopt children. [181] In May 2022, the High Administrative Court affirmed the ruling and rejected the appeal of the responsible Ministry. [68]
In June 2022, the Constitutional Court of Slovenia ruled that same-sex partners have the right to jointly adopt. [182] On 4 October 2022, the National Assembly (lower chamber of Slovenian parliament) passed the relevant act implementing this judgement, but a week later, the act was vetoed by the National Council (upper chamber of the parliament). This is to be followed by another vote on the act in the National Assembly and potentially a national referendum. [183]
Estonia and Greece since 2024, allows full-joint adoption of children by same-sex couples - along with same-sex marriage being legalized at the same time. [184]
Effective from 1/1/2025, the Czechia will allow same-sex couples “partial adoption” of their own biological child or children - but not full joint adoption. [185]
In Australia, same-sex adoption is legal in all states and territories since April 2018.
The Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013, which came into force on 19 August 2013, allowed same-sex marriage and permitted married same-sex couples to jointly adopt children. Previously, an LGBT individual was able to adopt children, but same-sex couples could not adopt jointly. [186]
Currently, there are no specific barriers preventing an LGBT individual from adopting children, except that male individuals cannot adopt a female child. Same-sex marriage law became effective from 19 August 2013, and since then married same-sex couples were able to adopt children jointly. Unmarried couples of any sex and couples in a civil union can now jointly adopt children, under a New Zealand High Court ruling in December 2015. The ban breached the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. [187] The minimum age to adopt in New Zealand is 20 years for a related child, and 25 years or the child's age plus 20 years (whichever is greater) for an unrelated child.
Country | LGBT individual may petition to adopt | Same-sex couple may jointly petition | Same-sex partner may petition to adopt partner's child | Same-sex couples are allowed to foster or stepchild foster |
---|---|---|---|---|
Andorra | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Austria | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes [d] |
Belgium | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Belarus | No | No | No | No |
Bulgaria | Yes | No | No | No |
Croatia | Yes | Yes [e] [68] | Yes | Yes [188] |
Czech Republic | Yes | No | Yes (Effective from 1/1/2025) | Yes [189] |
Cyprus | Yes | No | No | No |
Denmark | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Estonia | Yes | Yes [190] | Yes | Yes |
Faroe Islands | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Finland | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
France | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Germany | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Gibraltar | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Greece | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Guernsey | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Hungary | No(constitutional ban) | No(constitutional ban) [191] | No(constitutional ban) | No(constitutional ban) |
Iceland | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ireland | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Isle of Man | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Italy | No [f] | No | Yes | Yes |
Jersey | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Latvia | Yes | No | No | No |
Liechtenstein | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lithuania | No [g] | No | No | No |
Luxembourg | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Malta | Yes [193] | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Monaco | No | No | No | No |
Netherlands | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Norway | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Poland | Yes | No | No | No |
Portugal | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Romania | No | No | No | No |
San Marino | Yes | No | Yes [128] | No |
Slovakia | Yes | No | No | No |
Slovenia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Spain | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sweden | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Switzerland | Yes | Yes | Yes [194] [195] | Yes |
United Kingdom | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Country | LGBT individual adoption | Same-sex couple joint petition | Same-sex stepparent adoption |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Belize | No | No | No |
Bermuda | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Bolivia | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Brazil | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Canada | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Chile | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Colombia | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Costa Rica | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Cuba | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Dominican Republic | No | No | No |
Ecuador | Yes | No [a] | No [a] |
El Salvador | No | No | No |
Falkland Islands | Yes | Yes | Yes |
French Guiana | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Guatemala | No | No | No |
Guyana | No [b] | No [b] | No [b] |
Honduras | No [a] | No [a] | No [a] |
Mexico | Yes | Yes (some states) | Yes |
Nicaragua | No | No | No |
Paraguay | Yes | No | No |
Peru | No | No | No |
Puerto Rico | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Suriname | No | No | No |
United States | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Uruguay | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Venezuela | No | No | No |
Same-sex marriage, also known as gay marriage, is the marriage of two people of the same legal sex. As of 2024, marriage between same-sex couples is legally performed and recognized in 36 countries, with a total population of 1.5 billion people. The most recent jurisdictions to legalize same-sex marriage are Greece and Aruba and Curaçao in the Netherlands. Two more countries, Liechtenstein and Thailand, are set to begin performing same-sex marriages in January 2025.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) people in Hungary face legal and social challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Homosexuality is legal in Hungary for both men and women. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and sex is banned in the country. However, households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for all of the same legal rights available to heterosexual married couples. Registered partnership for same-sex couples was legalised in 2009, but same-sex marriage remains banned. The Hungarian government has passed legislation that restricts the civil rights of LGBT Hungarians – such as ending legal recognition of transgender Hungarians and banning LGBT content and displays for minors. This trend continues under the Fidesz government of Viktor Orbán. In June 2021, Hungary passed an anti-LGBT law on banning "homosexual and transexual propaganda" effective since 1 July. The law has been condemned by seventeen member states of the European Union. In July 2020, the European Commission started legal action against Hungary and Poland for violations of fundamental rights of LGBTQI people, stating: "Europe will never allow parts of our society to be stigmatized."
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Israel are considered the most developed in the Middle East and among the most developed in Asia. Although same-sex sexual activity was legalized in 1988, the former law against sodomy had not been enforced since a court decision in 1963. Israel became the first country in Asia to recognize unregistered cohabitation between same-sex couples, making it the first country in Asia to recognize same-sex unions in any capacity. Although same-sex marriages are not performed in the country, since Israel does not have civil non-religious marriages, and none of the recognized religious marriage institutions within the country perform same-sex marriages, Israeli law recognizes civil marriages performed elsewhere. Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation was prohibited in 1992. Same-sex couples are allowed to jointly adopt, following a landmark court decision in 2008. Previously, stepchild adoption, as well as limited co-guardianship rights for non-biological parents, were permitted. LGBTQ people are also allowed to serve openly in the military.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the Republic of Ireland are regarded as some of the most progressive in Europe and the world. Ireland is notable for its transformation from a country holding overwhelmingly conservative attitudes toward LGBTQ issues, in part due to the opposition by the Roman Catholic Church, to one holding overwhelmingly liberal views in the space of a generation. In May 2015, Ireland became the first country to legalise same-sex marriage on a national level by popular vote. The New York Times declared that the result put Ireland at the "vanguard of social change". Since July 2015, transgender people in Ireland can self-declare their gender for the purpose of updating passports, driving licences, obtaining new birth certificates, and getting married. Both male and female expressions of homosexuality were decriminalised in 1993, and most forms of discrimination based on sexual orientation are now outlawed. Ireland also forbids incitement to hatred based on sexual orientation. Article 41 of the Constitution of Ireland explicitly protects the right to marriage irrespective of sex.
Danish lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights are some of the most extensive in the world. In 2023, ILGA-Europe ranked Denmark as the third most LGBTQ-supportive country in Europe. Polls consistently show that same-sex marriage support is nearly universal amongst the Danish population.
The legal status of same-sex marriage has changed in recent years in numerous jurisdictions around the world. The current trends and consensus of political authorities and religions throughout the world are summarized in this article.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in Mexico expanded in the 21st century, keeping with worldwide legal trends. The intellectual influence of the French Revolution and the brief French occupation of Mexico (1862–67) resulted in the adoption of the Napoleonic Code, which decriminalized same-sex sexual acts in 1871. Laws against public immorality or indecency, however, have been used to prosecute persons who engage in them.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in Italy significantly advanced in the 21st century, although LGBTQ people still face various challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents, despite public opinion being increasingly liberal and in favor of LGBT rights. According to ILGA-Europe's 2021 report, the status of LGBT rights in Italy is below the standards of other Western European countries – such as still not recognizing same-sex marriage, lacking nationwide discrimination protections for goods and services, as well as not granting to same-sex couples full parental rights, such as joint adoption and IVF. Italy and Japan are the only G7 nations where same-sex marriages are not recognized.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) rights in Latvia have expanded substantially in recent years, although LGBT people still face various challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Both male and female types of same-sex sexual activity are legal in Latvia, but households headed by same-sex couples are ineligible for the same legal protections available to opposite-sex couples. Since May 2022, same-sex couples have been recognized as "family" by the Administrative District Court, which gives them some of the legal protections available to married (opposite-sex) couples; as of 2023 November, around 40 couples have been registered via this procedure. In November 2023 registered partnerships were codified into law. These partnerships are available to both same and different sex couples - since July 1, 2024 the implemented registered partnership law has the similar rights and obligations as married couples - with the exception of the title of marriage, and adoption or inheritance rights.
Same-sex parenting is the parenting of children by same-sex couples generally consisting of gay, lesbian, or bi people who are often in civil partnerships, domestic partnerships, civil unions, or same-sex marriages.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Hampshire enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people, with most advances in LGBT rights occurring in the state within the past two decades. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in New Hampshire, and the state began offering same-sex couples the option of forming a civil union on January 1, 2008. Civil unions offered most of the same protections as marriages with respect to state law, but not the federal benefits of marriage. Same-sex marriage in New Hampshire has been legally allowed since January 1, 2010, and one year later New Hampshire's civil unions expired, with all such unions converted to marriages. New Hampshire law has also protected against discrimination based on sexual orientation since 1998 and gender identity since 2018. Additionally, a conversion therapy ban on minors became effective in the state in January 2019. In effect since January 1, 2024, the archaic common-law "gay panic defence" was formally abolished; by legislation implemented within August 2023.
The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the Republic of China (Taiwan) are regarded as some of the most comprehensive of those in Asia. Both male and female same-sex sexual activity are legal, and same-sex marriage was legalized on 24 May 2019, following a Constitutional Court ruling in May 2017. Same-sex couples are able to jointly adopt children since 2023. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender characteristics in education has been banned nationwide since 2004. With regard to employment, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation has also been prohibited by law since 2007.
A same-sex relationship is a romantic or sexual relationship between people of the same sex. Same-sex marriage refers to the institutionalized recognition of such relationships in the form of a marriage; civil unions may exist in countries where same-sex marriage does not.
Du Toit and Another v Minister for Welfare and Population Development and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which granted same-sex couples the ability to jointly adopt children. LGBT people had already been able to adopt children individually, but only married couples could adopt jointly; the decision was handed down in September 2002, four years before same-sex marriage became legal in South Africa. The court ruled unanimously that the statutory provisions limiting joint adoption to married couples were unconstitutional, and the resulting order amended the law to treat same-sex partners in the same way as married couples.
Law in Australia with regard to children is often based on what is considered to be in the best interest of the child. The traditional and often used assumption is that children need both a mother and a father, which plays an important role in divorce and custodial proceedings, and has carried over into adoption and fertility procedures. As of April 2018 all Australian states and territories allow adoption by same-sex couples.
Until 2017, laws related to LGBTQ+ couples adopting children varied by state. Some states granted full adoption rights to same-sex couples, while others banned same-sex adoption or only allowed one partner in a same-sex relationship to adopt the biological child of the other.
The major religions in Taiwan are Buddhism and Taoism. In these religions, the beliefs present no arguable issues about LGBTQ people. There are no laws about punishing sodomy, which means a sexual relationship between males is not considered an abomination, unlike in many western and Abrahamic religions. However, it was long considered a taboo issue. When human rights issues were discussed in political arenas, the concept of Tongzhi became a key term among the politicians in Taiwan. When it emerged in political forums, Taiwanese people began to become familiar with the idea that Tongzhi people being a part of their culture. Yet still, LGBTQ people were not mentioned in Taiwanese law. Punishment for being part of the LGBTQ community did not exist, yet there was also not any welfare or protection for LGBTQ people.
Adoption by LGBT people in Europe differs in legal recognition from country to country. Full joint adoption or step-child adoption or both is legal in 23 of the 56 European countries, and in all dependent territories.
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Nayarit since 23 December 2015. A bill for the legalization of same-sex marriages was approved by the state Congress on 17 December in a 26–1 vote with 1 abstention. The law was published in the official state journal on 22 December and took effect the following day. Nayarit was the fourth Mexican state to legalise same-sex marriage after Quintana Roo, Coahuila and Chihuahua.
The second-parent adoption or co-parent adoption is a process by which a partner, who is not biologically related to the child, can adopt their partner's biological or adoptive child without terminating the first legal parent's rights. This process is of interest to many couples, as legal parenthood allows the parent's partner to do things such as: make medical decisions, claim dependency, or gain custody in the event of the death of the biological parent.