Queerplatonic relationship

Last updated

Queerplatonic relationships (QPR), also known as queerplatonic partnerships (QPP), are committed intimate relationships between significant others whose relationship is not romantic in nature. A queerplatonic relationship differs from a close friendship by having the same explicit commitment, status, and structure as a formal romantic relationship, whilst it differs from a romantic relationship by not involving feelings of romantic love. [1] The concept originates in aromantic and asexual spaces in the LGBT community. [2] Like romantic relationships, queerplatonic relationships are sometimes said to involve a deeper and more profound emotional connection than typical friendship.

Contents

Definition

The Asexual Visibility and Education Network defines queerplatonic relationships as "non-romantic significant-other relationships of 'partner status'". [3]

Angela Chen describes queerplatonic partnership as "one of the few explicit titles available to describe the social space between 'friend' and 'romantic partner'" for non-romantic partners who share the "intense relationship and the security of explicit validation" otherwise associated exclusively with romance. [2]

Julie Sondra Decker writes that QPR often "looks indistinguishable from romance when outside the equation", but should not be "assigned a romantic status if participants say it is not romantic". She also notes that observers can misread it as a typical close friendship in circumstances where overtly romantic gestures are socially expected. For Decker, the essence of queerplatonic attraction is its ambiguous position in relation to normative categories: she writes that QPR "is a platonic relationship, but it is 'queered' in some way—not friends, not romantic partners, but something else". [4] Similarly, CJ DeLuzio Chasin characterises QPR as a "meta-category 'catch-all'" for "non-normative relationships" that are "not romantic relationships but which are also not adequately or properly described by 'friendship'". [5]

Some authors put less stress on the partner-status structure or non-normative character of QPR and focus more on the idea that it represents a stronger emotional connection than conventional friendship. For instance, the College of William & Mary's neologism dictionary defines QPR as an "extremely close" relationship that is "beyond friendship" without being romantic, [6] and sex therapist Stefani Goerlich in Psychology Today similarly describes QPRs as a "deeper commitment than friendship". [7]

Terminology

The term "queerplatonic" was coined in 2010 by the writers s. e. cummings and Kaz. [2]

The form of attraction that is involved in queerplatonic relationships has been described using the word "alterous". [8] [9] Alternatively, other sources have used the word "queerplatonic" to describe a form of attraction as well as a category of relationship. [10] [11] [12]

In asexual and aromantic online spaces, queerplatonic partners are sometimes called "zucchinis". [3] [13] LGBT news website PinkNews describes this as "a joke which refers to the lack of terminology to describe meaningful relationships outside of romantic or sexual partnerships". [14] A platonic crush is called a "squish", [15] [16] and this term has been applied to QPR. [17]

Origins and use

The term originates in the aromantic and asexual communities, [2] [6] [13] and it was largely restricted to these spaces in the 2010s. The Huffington Post described it in 2014 as a "new label" coming from the same place as "aromantic" and "demisexual", [18] the College of William & Mary's neologism dictionary observed in 2016 that it was only used in aromantic and asexual spaces, [6] and Zach Schudson and Sari van Anders characterised it in 2019 as one of several "emergent gender and sexual identity discourses" appearing on LGBT social networking sites. [19]

However, from 2021, some popular websites aimed at general audiences began to discuss the concept, [7] [20] [21] [22] [23] and the concept has been used (rather than merely discussed as a neologism) in some academic art and literature criticism. [24] [25] [26]

Some authors observed in the 2020s that QPR is associated with polyamory. A 2021 qualitative analysis of the language used by people involved in polyamory gave the word "queerplatonic" as a typical example of the "complex" vocabulary often used by individuals involved in consensual non-monogamous relationships. [27] Y. Gavriel Ansara, writing for an audience of relationship counsellors, also observes that the term is common among polyamorous people. [28] A 2022 article in the women's magazine Bustle drew parallels between "queerplatonic life partnerships" and consensual non-monogamy, relating both to relationship anarchy and the shared principle that the participants "customize their commitments according to what the people in the relationship desire". [23]

Schudson and van Anders (2019) and the 2022 Bustle article also assert that use of the term is driven by "young people", [19] or millennials and Generation Z. [23]

Sex therapist Stefani Goerlich suggested in 2021 that the concept was inspired by Boston marriages—formalized romantic friendships between wealthy women in late nineteenth century New England. She also characterized QPRs as "an ancient practice made popular again", and suggests that Ruth and Naomi in the Hebrew Bible might have had "one of the earliest recorded QPRs". [7]

Social analysis

Savie Luce challenges the conventional queer reading of Mary Eleanor Wilkins Freeman's Two Friends, a story depicting a Boston marriage, which casts it in a "sexualized queer light" as depicting a sapphic relationship. She argues that through the lens of QPR and Ela Przybylo's concept of "asexual erotics", Freeman's protagonists can be read as erotic lesbian partners without the need to mischaracterise their relationship as sexual or romantic, which Luce regards as "erotonormative". She also presents QPR as a radical counter-narrative to the lesbian bed death trope, with asexuality "an additive quality rather than a deficit" in a queerplatonic partnership between women. [26]

Some authors have seen the concept of QPR as a reaction against an amatonormative hierarchy in which romantic relationships are regarded as more important than friendships. The author of the William & Mary neologism dictionary's entry on QPR opines that the desire to designate a close platonic attachment as a significant other rather than a best friend only exists because of the normative expectation that an individual should prioritize their partner over their friends—for them, QPR is only distinguished from friendship because the latter is not "considered a valid replacement for romantic love". [6]

Similarly, Roma De las Heras Gómez connects relationship anarchy's critique of the idea that a romantic relationship is necessary to "create a family that includes long-term partnership, cohabitation, joint economic responsibility, and potential child raising" to the folk categories used in "asexual communities and aromantic communities online", and though she does not directly mention QPR, she does use the phrase "queerplatonic relationships" as a keyword for the paper, [29] suggesting that she sees QPR as similar to relationship-anarchist non-sexual cohabitation and co-parenting.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romantic orientation</span> Classification of a persons romantic attraction towards others

Romantic orientation, also called affectional orientation, is the classification of the sex or gender which a person experiences romantic attraction towards or is likely to have a romantic relationship with. The term is used alongside the term "sexual orientation", as well as being used alternatively to it, based upon the perspective that sexual attraction is only a single component of a larger concept.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polyamory</span> Intimacy for multiple partners

Polyamory is the practice of, or the desire for, romantic relationships with more than one partner at the same time, with the informed consent of all partners involved. Some people who identify as polyamorous believe in consensual non-monogamy with a conscious management of jealousy and reject the view that sexual and relational exclusivity (monogamy) are prerequisite for deep, committed, long-term, loving relationships. Others prefer to restrict their sexual activity to only members of the group, a closed polyamorous relationship that is usually referred to as polyfidelity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asexuality</span> Lack of sexual attraction to others

Asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to others, or low or absent interest in or desire for sexual activity. It may be considered a sexual orientation or the lack thereof. It may also be categorized more widely, to include a broad spectrum of asexual sub-identities.

Platonic love is a type of love in which sexual desire or romantic features are nonexistent or have been suppressed, sublimated, or purgated, but it means more than simple friendship.

LGBTQ slang, LGBTQ speak, queer slang, or gay slang is a set of English slang lexicon used predominantly among LGBTQ+ people. It has been used in various languages since the early 20th century as a means by which members of the LGBTQ+ community identify themselves and speak in code with brevity and speed to others. The acronym LGBT was popularized in the 1990s and stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender. It may refer to anyone who is non-heterosexual or non-cisgender, instead of exclusively to people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. To recognize this inclusion, a popular variant, LGBTQ, adds the letter Q for those who identify as queer or are questioning their sexual or gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-monogamy</span> Intimate relationship that is not strictly monogamous

Non-monogamy is an umbrella term for every practice or philosophy of non-dyadic intimate relationship that does not strictly hew to the standards of monogamy, particularly that of having only one person with whom to exchange sex, love, and/or affection. In that sense, "nonmonogamy" may be accurately applied to extramarital sex, group marriage, or polyamory. It is not synonymous with infidelity, since all parties are consenting to the relationship structure, partners are often committed to each other as well as to their other partners and cheating is still considered problematic behavior with many non-monogamous relationships.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to interpersonal relationships.

Terminology within polyamory looks at the evolution and meaning of the word "polyamory" itself, as well as alternative definitions and concepts which closely relate to it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demisexuality</span> Only experiencing secondary sexual attraction

Demisexuality is a sexual orientation in which an individual does not experience primary sexual attraction – the type of attraction that is based on immediately observable characteristics such as appearance or smell and is experienced immediately after a first encounter. A demisexual person can only experience secondary sexual attraction – the type of attraction that occurs after the development of an emotional bond. The amount of time that a demisexual individual needs to know another person before developing sexual attraction towards them varies from person to person. Demisexuality is generally categorized on the asexuality spectrum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aromanticism</span> Lack of romantic attraction to others

Aromanticism is a romantic orientation characterized by experiencing little to no romantic attraction. The term "aromantic", colloquially shortened to "aro", refers to a person whose romantic orientation is aromanticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gray asexuality</span> Spectrum between asexuality and allosexuality

Gray asexuality, grey asexuality, or gray-sexuality is the spectrum between asexuality and allosexuality. Individuals who identify with gray asexuality are referred to as being gray-A, gray ace, and make up what is referred to as the "ace umbrella". Within this spectrum are terms such as demisexual, semisexual, asexual-ish and sexual-ish.

This is a timeline of asexual history worldwide. The briefness of this timeline can be attributed to the fact that acceptance of asexuality as a sexual orientation and field of scientific research is still relatively new.

Amatonormativity is the set of societal assumptions that everyone prospers with an exclusive romantic relationship. Elizabeth Brake coined the neologism to capture societal assumptions about romance. Brake wanted to describe the pressure she received by many to prioritize marriage in her own life when she did not want to. Amatonormativity extends beyond social pressures for marriage to include general pressures involving romance.

Polyamory in the United States is the practice of, or the desire for, romantic relationships with more than one partner at the same time, with the informed consent of all partners involved, in the United States. Polyamory is a relationship type that is practiced by a minority of the population in the United States, about 4 to 5 percent. According to a 2016 study, 20 percent of singles in the US have attempted some form of consensual non-monogamy at some point of their lives, such as polyamory or open relationships. In a study, polyamorous couples tend to identify as bisexual and pansexual.

<i>Minimizing Marriage</i> 2012 book by Elizabeth Brake

Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law is a 2012 book by Elizabeth Brake in which the author provides an "in-depth examination of marriage, within the context of contemporary ethical and political theory."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Split attraction model</span> Discordance between sexual and romantic attraction

The split attraction model (SAM) is a model in psychology that distinguishes between a person's romantic and sexual attraction, allowing the two to be different from each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Paramo</span> American writer

Michael Paramo is a writer, academic, and artist known for founding the literary magazine Aze and for their work examining interpersonal attraction and love with consideration to asexuality, aromanticism, and agender identity. Paramo identifies on the asexual and aromantic spectrum and advocates for people of similar experience to express themselves toward expanding society's ideas of human sexuality, romance, and gender identity. They published a book Ending the Pursuit: Asexuality, Aromanticism, and Agender Identity in 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aromantic flag</span> Pride flag

The aromantic flag is a pride flag representing aromanticism, aromantic individuals and the aromantic community. The flag was designed by Cameron Whimsy in 2014.

References

  1. ↑ Some more exact definitions of QPR include:
    • CJ DeLuzio Chasin refers to QPR as a "meta-category 'catch-all'" for "non-normative relationships" that are "not romantic ... but which are also not adequately or properly described by 'friendship'".
    • The College of William & Mary's neologism dictionary defines QPR as an "extremely close" relationship that is "beyond friendship" without being romantic.
    See the section "Definition" below.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Chen, Angela (2021). Ace: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex. Beacon Press. pp. 118–121. ISBN   978-0-8070-1473-8. OCLC   1337835879.
  3. 1 2 Chasin, CJ DeLuzio (2015). "Making Sense in and of the Asexual Community: Navigating Relationships and Identities in a Context of Resistance". Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 25 (2): 167–180. doi:10.1002/casp.2203.
  4. ↑ Decker, Julie Sondra (September 2014). The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality. Skyhorse. p. 25. ISBN   978-1634502436.
  5. ↑ Chasin, CJ DeLuzio (2019). "Asexuality and the Re/Construction of Sexual Orientation" (PDF). In Simula, Brandy L.; Sumerau, J. E.; Miller, Andrea (eds.). Expanding the Rainbow: Exploring the Relationships of Bi+, Polyamorous, Kinky, Ace, Intersex, and Trans People. Leiden: Brill. pp. 209–219. ISBN   9789004414099.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Queerplatonic". 21st-Century Interdisciplinary Dictionary: A William & Mary Lexicon of English Neologisms, Buzzwords, Keywords and Jargon. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  7. 1 2 3 Goerlich, Stefani (6 September 2021). "Queerplatonic Relationships: A New Term for an Old Custom". Psychology Today . Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  8. ↑ Gardiner, Georgi (2023). "We Forge the Conditions of Love". academic.oup.com. pp. 279–314. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192845450.003.0012. ISBN   978-0-19-284545-0 . Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  9. ↑ Young, Eris (21 December 2022). Ace Voices: What it Means to Be Asexual, Aromantic, Demi or Grey-Ace. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN   978-1-78775-699-1.
  10. ↑ "A Guide to 14 Different Types of Attraction". Choosing Therapy. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  11. ↑ Barron, Victoria (21 June 2023). Amazing Ace, Awesome Aro: An Illustrated Exploration. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN   978-1-83997-715-2.
  12. ↑ Aral, Nigiel; Castro, Maxene Alexandra De; Mansukhani, Karuna May; Sara, Ayeesha Heather (29 April 2021). "Determinants of Sexual Literacy of Senior High School Students in De La Salle University-Manila". DLSU Senior High School Research Congress.
  13. 1 2 "The 'A' in LGBT". Counterpoint. 35 (1): 8. September 2013.
  14. ↑ Smith, Lydia (18 April 2018). "What is a quasiplatonic aka queerplatonic relationship?". PinkNews. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  15. ↑ "Who's Your Main Squish? 15 Signs You're Squishing on Someone". LovePanky - Your Guide to Better Love and Relationships. 22 May 2017. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  16. ↑ "Squish- That Platonic Crush You Always Experienced But Never Had A Name For". ED Times | Youth Media Channel. 29 July 2016. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  17. ↑ Omnes et Nihil (2014). Queerplatonic Zucchinis: A Short Primer [zine] (PDF).
  18. ↑ Brekke, Kira (8 October 2014). "This Is What It Means To Be Aromantic, Demiromantic And Queerplatonic". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  19. 1 2 van Anders, Sari; Schudson, Zach (12 August 2019). "'You have to coin new things': Sexual and gender identity discourses in asexual, queer, and/or trans young people's networked counterpublics". Psychology & Sexuality. 10 (4): 354–368. doi:10.1080/19419899.2019.1653957. hdl: 1974/32792 . S2CID   202286008 . Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  20. ↑ "What Does A Queerplatonic Relationship Look Like?". DriveThru. 11 June 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  21. ↑ Davenport, Barrie (November 2021). "Are You In A Queerplatonic Relationship? 13 Clues You Are". Live Bold & Bloom. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  22. ↑ "Queerplatonic Relationship: What It Is & 25 Signs You're In One". LovePanky: Your Guide to Better Love and Relationships. 12 June 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  23. 1 2 3 Inks, Lexi. "Your Guide To Queerplatonic Life Partnerships". Bustle. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  24. ↑ Popova, Milena (3 April 2018). "'Dogfuck rapeworld': Omegaverse fanfiction as a critical tool in analyzing the impact of social power structures on intimate relationships and sexual consent". Porn Studies. 5 (2): 201. doi:10.1080/23268743.2017.1394215 . Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  25. ↑ Przybyło, Ela (2022). "Ace and aro lesbian art and theory with Agnes Martin and Yayoi Kusama". Journal of Lesbian Studies. 26 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1080/10894160.2021.1958732. PMID   34463602. S2CID   239671332.
  26. 1 2 Luce, Savie (2021). "Asexual Erasure Undone: A Short Literary History of Asexuality in 19th-to 20th-Century Literary Classics".
  27. ↑ Cardoso, Daniel; Pascoal, Patricia M.; Maiochi, Francisco Hertel (27 May 2021). "Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People's Definitions" (PDF). Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50 (4): 1239–1252. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y. PMC   8321986 . PMID   34046765 . Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  28. ↑ Ansara, Y. Gavriel (2020). "Challenging everyday monogamism: Making the paradigm shift from couple-centric bias to polycule-centred practice in counselling and psychotherapy". Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia. 8 (2). doi: 10.59158/001c.71237 . S2CID   257705886 . Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  29. ↑ De las Heras Gómez, Roma (2019). "Thinking Relationship Anarchy from a Queer Feminist Approach" (PDF). Sociological Research Online. 24 (4): 12. doi:10.1177/1360780418811965. S2CID   150062238.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.