Cities and counties in the United States offering a domestic partnership registry

Last updated

As of 2015, all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia legally recognize and document same-sex relationships in some fashion, be it by same-sex marriage, civil union or domestic partnerships. Many counties and municipalities outside of these states also provide domestic partnership registries or civil unions which are not officially recognized by the laws of their states, are only valid and applicable within those counties, and are usually largely unaffected by state law regarding relationship recognition (except in some aspects). In addition, many cities and counties continue to provide their own domestic partnership registries while their states also provide larger registries (for all relationship recognitions); a couple can only maintain registration on one registry, requiring the couple to de-register from the state registry before registering with the county registry.

Contents

These are the cities and counties of United States which offer a domestic partnership and/or civil union classified by census region. [1]

West Region

.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Cities, boroughs, towns, townships, unincorporated areas, and villages that offers domestic partner benefits
Counties, consolidated city-counties, boroughs, parishes, and independent cities that offers domestic partner benefits
State-wide partner benefits through same-sex marriage, civil unions, domestic partnership, designated beneficiary agreements, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships
State-wide partner benefits through same-sex marriage, civil unions, domestic partnership, designated beneficiary agreements, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships, including state-wide domestic partnership benefits for state employees US counties and cities with domestic partnership.svg
   Cities, boroughs, towns, townships, unincorporated areas, and villages that offers domestic partner benefits
   Counties, consolidated city-counties, boroughs, parishes, and independent cities that offers domestic partner benefits
  State-wide partner benefits through same-sex marriage, civil unions, domestic partnership, designated beneficiary agreements, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships, including state-wide domestic partnership benefits for state employees

Pacific Division

Hawaii

Same-sex marriages, civil unions, domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) and reciprocal beneficiary relationships are all granted throughout the state to same-sex couples. [2]

Alaska

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Washington State

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples and all previous domestic partnerships (with the exception of couples with at least one member aged 62 or above) have automatically been converted into civil marriage.

Oregon

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

California

Same-sex marriage and domestic partnerships are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Mountain Division

Idaho

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Montana

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Wyoming

Same-sex marriage are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Nevada

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Utah

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Colorado

Same-sex marriages, civil unions and designated beneficiary agreements are all granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Arizona

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

New Mexico

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the state to same-sex couples. [13]

Midwest Region

West North Central Division

North Dakota

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

South Dakota

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Minnesota

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Nebraska

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the state to same-sex couples.

Iowa

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Kansas

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

  • City of Lawrence: Both individuals must be residents of the City of Lawrence, Kansas. Both opposite- and same-sex couples.
  • City of Topeka: Both be residents of the city of Topeka. Share a common permanent residence. Agree to be in a relationship of mutual interdependence. Each be at least 18 years old and mentally competent to enter into a contract. Not be related by blood as defined by Kansas law. Agree to file a Declaration of Domestic Partnership with the city of Topeka. [28] [29]

Missouri

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

East North Central Division

Wisconsin

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Michigan

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Illinois

Same-sex marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are all granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples. [42] [43] [44]

Indiana

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Ohio

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

North-East Region

New England Division

Vermont

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Rhode Island

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples and all previous civil unions were automatically converted into same sex marriages.

New Hampshire

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples and all previous civil unions were automatically converted into same sex marriages.

Maine

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Massachusetts

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

  • City of Boston: No residency requirement. Both opposite- and same-sex couples.
  • Town of Brewster: No residency requirement. Both opposite- and same-sex couples.
  • Town of Brookline: No residency requirement. Limited to same-sex couples.
  • City of Cambridge: No residency requirement. Both opposite- and same-sex couples. Benefits include visitation rights in hospitals and correctional facilities equal to those given to a spouse. A domestic partner, who is also the parent or legal guardian of a child, may file a form at or send a letter to the child's school to indicate that the parent's domestic partner shall have access to the child's records.
  • Town of Nantucket: No residency requirement. Open to opposite- and same-sex couples.
  • Town of Provincetown: No residency requirement for registrants. Both opposite- and same-sex couples. Benefits include visitation rights in hospitals and correctional facilities equal to those given to a spouse. A domestic partner, who is also the parent or legal guardian of a child, may file a form at or send a letter to the child's school to indicate that the parent's domestic partner shall have access to the child's records.

Connecticut

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples and all previous civil unions were automatically converted into same sex marriages.

Middle Atlantic Division

New York State

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Pennsylvania

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

New Jersey

Same-sex marriages, civil unions, and domestic partnerships are all granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

South Region

West South Central Division

Oklahoma

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Texas

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Arkansas

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Louisiana

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

East South Central Division

Kentucky

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Tennessee

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Mississippi

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Alabama

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

South Atlantic Division

Delaware

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships (limited to state employees only) are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples. All previous civil unions have been automatically converted into civil marriages. [86]

Maryland

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships are both granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Washington, DC

Same-sex marriages and domestic partnerships are both granted in the entire district to same-sex couples.

West Virginia

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Virginia

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

North Carolina

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

South Carolina

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Georgia

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Florida

Same-sex marriages are granted throughout the entire state to same-sex couples.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil union</span> Legal union similar to marriage

A civil union is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, created primarily as a means to provide recognition in law for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage.

A domestic partnership is an intimate relationship between people, usually couples, who live together and share a common domestic life but who are not married. People in domestic partnerships receive legal benefits that guarantee right of survivorship, hospital visitation, and other rights.

A California domestic partnership is a legal relationship, analogous to marriage, created in 1999 to extend the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. It was extended to all opposite-sex couples as of January 1, 2016 and by January 1, 2020 to include new votes that updated SB-30 with more benefits and rights to California couples choosing domestic partnership before their wedding. California Governor Newsom signed into law on July 30, 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reciprocal beneficiary relationships in Hawaii</span>

Since 1997, the U.S. state of Hawaii has offered reciprocal beneficiary registration for any adults who are prohibited by state law from marrying, including both same-sex and opposite-sex couples.

In the United States, domestic partnership is a city-, county-, state-, or employer-recognized status that may be available to same-sex couples and, sometimes, opposite-sex couples. Although similar to marriage, a domestic partnership does not confer any of the myriad rights and responsibilities of marriage afforded to married couples by the federal government. Domestic partnerships in the United States are determined by each state or local jurisdiction, so there is no nationwide consistency on the rights, responsibilities, and benefits accorded domestic partners.

Domestic partnerships were established in the state of Maine by statute in April 2004, taking effect on July 30, 2004. This placed Maine in the category of U.S. states that offered limited recognition of same-sex relationships, but not all of the legal protections of marriage, as Maine does not recognize common law marriages.

Same-sex unions in the United States are available in various forms in all states and territories, except American Samoa. All states have legal same-sex marriage, while others have the options of civil unions, domestic partnerships, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships. The federal government only recognizes marriage and no other legal union for same-sex couples.

Domestic partnerships in Wisconsin afford limited rights to same-sex couples. They have been recognized in Wisconsin since August 3, 2009. Domestic partnerships in Wisconsin provide select rights, such as the ability to inherit a partner's estate in the absence of a will, hospital and jail visitation, and the ability to access family medical leave to care for a sick partner. Wisconsin's domestic partnership registry does not provide for two-parent adoptions by persons of the same sex, and it confers far fewer rights, duties and protections than are associated with marriage. Wisconsin ended its domestic partnership registry on April 1, 2018.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Utah since October 6, 2014. On December 20, 2013, the state began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples as a result of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah's ruling in the case of Kitchen v. Herbert, which found that barring same-sex couples from marrying violates the U.S. Constitution. The issuance of those licenses was halted during the period of January 6, 2014 until October 6, 2014, following the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On that day, following the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to hear an appeal in a case that found Utah's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the state to recognize same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against enforcement of Nevada's same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada approved in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

Same-sex marriage has been recognized in Montana since a federal district court ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on November 19, 2014. Montana had previously denied marriage rights to same-sex couples by statute since 1997 and in its State Constitution since 2004. The state appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but before that court could hear the case, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all same-sex marriage bans in the country in Obergefell v. Hodges, mooting any remaining appeals.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in North Carolina since October 10, 2014, when a U.S. District Court judge ruled in General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper that the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples was unconstitutional. Governor Pat McCrory and Attorney General Roy Cooper had acknowledged that a recent ruling in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to hear an appeal in that case established the unconstitutionality of North Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage. State legislators sought without success to intervene in lawsuits to defend the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

Before the legalization of same-sex marriage in Florida in January 2015, same-sex couples were able to have their relationships recognized in some Florida localities that had established a legal status known as domestic partnership.

Several jurisdictions in the U.S. state of Ohio have established domestic partnerships for same-sex couples. The fate of these partnerships remains uncertain since marriage has become available to all couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Wisconsin</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Wisconsin enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBT people. However, the transgender community may face some legal issues not experienced by cisgender residents, due in part to discrimination based on gender identity not being included in Wisconsin's anti-discrimination laws, nor is it covered in the state's hate crime law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Wolf v. Walker. Discrimination based on sexual orientation is banned statewide in Wisconsin, and sexual orientation is a protected class in the state's hate crime laws. It approved such protections in 1982, making it the first state in the United States to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Missouri</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Missouri face some legal challenges not experienced by other residents throughout the state, excluding St. Louis, Kansas City, and Columbia. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Missouri, in accordance with 2003's Lawrence v. Texas decision.

The Domestic Partner Task Force was a governmental body established in 1983 by the Californian City of Berkeley's Human Relations and Welfare Commission to draw up the structure of the city's domestic partnership program. Leland Traiman, then the vice-chair of the HRWC and a gay rights activist, was appointed as leader of the Task Force.

The topic of same-sex unions and military service concerns the government treatment or recognition of same-sex unions who may consist of at least one servicemember of a nation's military.

The U.S. state of Texas issues marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognizes those marriages when performed out-of-state. On June 26, 2015, the United States legalized same-sex marriage nationwide due to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Article 1, Section 32, of the Texas Constitution provided that "Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman," and "This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage." This amendment and all related statutes have been ruled unconstitutional and unenforceable. Some cities and counties in the state recognize both same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partnerships.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in the U.S. state of Georgia since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Attorney General Sam Olens announced that Georgia would "adhere to the ruling of the Court", and the first couple married just one hour after the ruling was handed down. Previously, Georgia had banned same-sex marriage both by statute and its State Constitution.

References

  1. "City and County Domestic Partner Registries". Human Right Campaign & varia. Archived from the original on August 28, 2009. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
  2. "Hawaii Governor Signs Gay Marriage Law; Takes Effect Dec. 2 - On Top Magazine | Gay news & entertainment". Ontopmag.com. 2013-11-13. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 "Governments Offering Benefits". Buddybuddy.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  4. "Update 2013: 9 couples register as domestic partners". Missoulian.com. 2013-12-30. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  5. "Domestic Partners Approved for Salt Lake County Insurance". Personalinsure.about.com. 2014-05-28. Archived from the original on 2014-04-13. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  6. "Salt Lake County creates registry for variety of family relationships". Sltrib.com. 2013-06-05. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  7. Carcamo, Cindy (2013-04-03). "Bisbee becomes Arizona's first city to OK same-sex civil unions". Los Angeles Times. ISSN   0458-3035 . Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  8. Gonzalez, Yvonne (November 13, 2013). "Civil unions pass unanimously in Clarkdale". Verde Independent. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  9. "Cottonwood approves same-sex civil unions" . Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  10. "City of Flagstaff Official Website - City Clerk". flagstaff.az.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  11. Lineberger, Mark (16 September 2013). "Jerome OKs civil unions - JournalAZ.com - Verde Valley News, Jobs, Classifieds". journalaz.com. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  12. Eland, Ron. "Sedona City Council approves civil unions with 5-2 vote - Sedona Red Rock News - Sedona News, Jobs, Things to Do". redrocknews.com. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  13. 1 2 "New Mexico Supreme Court legalizes gay marriage". alibi.com. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
  14. "Insurance for Domestic Partners". alibi.com. Retrieved December 10, 2013.
  15. "City of Crystal Application for Registration as Domestic Partners" (PDF). City of Crystal. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  16. "Domestic Partnership Registration Application" (PDF). City of Eagan. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 30, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  17. "Section 5.73 Domestic Partnerships" (PDF). City of Eden Prairie. Retrieved March 6, 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  18. "Ordinance No. 11-03". City of Falcon Heights. July 27, 2011. Archived from the original on July 8, 2014. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  19. "Domestic Partnership Registration Application" (PDF). City of Golden Valley. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  20. Nelson, Tim (November 9, 2010). "Maplewood passes domestic partnership ordinance". Minnesota Public Radio . Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  21. "Ordinance No. 7, Fourth Series" (PDF). City of Red Wing. June 13, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 20, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  22. "Bill No. 2011-3" (PDF). City of Richfield. February 8, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 5, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  23. "Section 1015 – Domestic Partnership Registry" (PDF). City of Robbinsdale. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  24. "81. Civil Rights and Domestic Partnerships" (PDF). City of Rochester. July 19, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 20, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  25. "City Offers Domestic Partnership Registry". City of Shorewood. Archived from the original on November 3, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  26. "Application for Registration as a Domestic Partnership" (PDF). City of St. Louis Park. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 23, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  27. "Floyd County OKs insurance coverage for domestic partners". globegazette.com. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  28. "City to start offering domestic partnership registry Monday".
  29. Kellaway, Mitch (2014-05-28). "Topeka, Kan., Now Protects Gender Identity, Domestic Partnerships". Advocate.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  30. "City of Clayton Approves Domestic Partnership Registry to Improve Access, Enhance Quality of Life" (Press release). City of Clayton. January 25, 2012. Archived from the original on May 15, 2013. Retrieved March 30, 2012.
  31. "Affidavit of Joanne R. Mossle" (PDF). American Civil Liberties Union. March 8, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  32. "Ordinance No. 2457" (PDF). City of Olivette. July 26, 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 24, 2014. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  33. "Domestic Partnership Registry". City of University City. Archived from the original on April 1, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  34. 1 2 3 4 "Janesville, Wis., approves partnership measure". Wisconsingazette.com. 2012-11-13. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  35. Hurd, Kevin (April 24, 2012). "Eau Claire City council approves insurance for domestic partnerships". WEAU-TV . Retrieved April 25, 2012.
  36. Flores, Terry (2013-01-21). "Little use of county's new domestic partner health care benefit". kenoshanews.com. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
  37. Won, Christine (March 7, 2012). "City approves benefits for employees' domestic partners". The Journal Times. Retrieved June 1, 2012.
  38. "Rock County OKs benefits for same-sex couples". Gazettextra.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  39. "Charter Provision and Ethics Ordinance" (PDF). City of Detroit. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 29, 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  40. Wittrock, Angela (January 31, 2012). "East Lansing may join lawsuit against domestic partner benefits ban". Michigan Live LLC . Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  41. "Kalamazoo to study domestic partner law". Morning Sun. 25 December 2001. Retrieved 16 December 2017.
  42. "Quinn signs gay marriage bill into law". Chicago Tribune. November 21, 2013. Archived from the original on November 21, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2013.
  43. SOPHIA TAREEN. "Illinois governor signs same-sex marriage into law". TwinCities.com. Associated Press. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  44. "Illinois Becomes 15th State To Legalize Gay Marriage - On Top Magazine | Gay news & entertainment". Ontopmag.com. 2013-11-05. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  45. 1 2 3 "Indy passes benefits for domestic partners". IDS. Archived from the original on December 12, 2013. Retrieved December 10, 2013.
  46. "Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard OKs domestic partner benefits". indystar.com. Retrieved December 10, 2013.
  47. "Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard OKs domestic partner benefits". Indy Star. Retrieved February 21, 2014.
  48. "Declaration of Domestic Partnership" (PDF). City of Athens. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  49. Prendergast, Jane (May 2, 2012). "City to offer domestic partner benefits". The Cincinnati Enquirer . Retrieved May 3, 2012.
  50. Sullivan, Lucas (August 29, 2012). "Domestic-partner registry starts for city's same-sex couples". The Columbus Dispatch . Retrieved August 30, 2012.
  51. Johnston, Laura (February 14, 2012). "Cuyahoga County approves domestic partner benefits". The Plain Dealer . Retrieved May 2, 2012.
  52. "Dayton opens domestic partner registry". Dayton Daily News . June 1, 2012. Retrieved June 1, 2012.
  53. "Franklin County Offers Domestic Partner Benefits to Employees" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-04. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  54. "Lakewood joins handful of Ohio cities offering benefits to same-sex domestic partners". cleveland.com. 2013-10-08. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  55. "Declaration of Domestic Partnership". City of Toledo. Archived from the original on May 29, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  56. Chiddister, Diane (September 10, 2009). "Council approves partner registry". Yellow Springs News . Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  57. "Requirements for Domestic Partnership Registry" (PDF). Town of Babylon. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 30, 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  58. Burghardt, Linda F. (November 23, 2003). "In Brief; Domestic Partner Registry Splits Great Neck". The New York Times . Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  59. "Plaza adopts domestic partner registry" (PDF). Plaza Voice. Winter 2003. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  60. "Chapter 98. Domestic Partnership Registry". Town of Huntington. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  61. "Registration of Domestic Partnerships". Town of North Hempstead. Archived from the original on February 18, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  62. Kreitzman, Wendy K. (July 30, 2004). "Town Considers Domestic Partner Registry". Great Neck Record. Archived from the original on December 1, 2008. Retrieved March 6, 2012. Mr. Hirsch and his longtime partner, Herbert Leiman, are noted equal rights activists and were the first to sign the domestic partner registry in North Hills.
  63. "Village Code 12th Edition - Local Law 4 - 2011". Village of Roslyn Estates. December 31, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  64. "Chapter 121. Domestic Partnerships". Town of Southold. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  65. "Ordinance No. 14868" (PDF). City of Allentown. January 26, 2011. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
  66. "ACLU of PA applauds Harrisburg City Council approval of domestic partner ordinance" (Press release). American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. December 22, 2008. Archived from the original on January 4, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  67. Michael P. Buffer (Staff Writer). "County code compels same-sex couples to identify relationship - News". Citizens Voice. Retrieved June 21, 2012.
  68. "Council Agenda". Borough of State College. August 1, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  69. ""Domestic Partnership Affidavit and Agreement", City of Austin Texas" (PDF). Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  70. "Domestic Partner Benefits Approved For Bexar County Employees". tpr.org. February 4, 2014. Retrieved February 4, 2014.
  71. "Affidavit of Domestic Partnership" (PDF). City of Dallas. August 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 17, 2011. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  72. Waugh, Anna (October 30, 2012). "Breaking: Dallas County approves domestic partner insurance benefits". Dallas Voice . Archived from the original on November 1, 2012. Retrieved October 30, 2012.
  73. "Domestic Partnership Affidavit" (PDF). City of El Paso. Retrieved March 6, 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  74. Waugh, Anna (August 13, 2012). "El Paso County becomes 2nd in Texas to offer domestic partner benefits". Dallas Voice . Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  75. "Employee Benefits, Human Resources, City of Fort Worth". Fortworthtexas.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-06-27. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  76. "Houston Mayor: Benefits will be offered to same-sex spouses of city employees". kens5.com. November 20, 2013. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 23, 2013.
  77. "Domestic Partnership Information and Enrollment Packet" (PDF). City of San Antonio. October 17, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
  78. Estep, Bill (February 21, 2013). "Berea becomes 3rd Kentucky city to offer domestic-partner benefits". kentucky.com. Retrieved November 25, 2013. Berea has become the third city in Kentucky to extend domestic-partner benefits to employees, an advocacy group said Thursday in a news release.
  79. Pittman, Jeremy (May 14, 2012). "Domestic Partner Benefits on Both Sides of the Ohio River". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on July 24, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012. Across the Ohio River, city commissioners in Covington, Kentucky, voted to allow municipal employees to extend insurance coverage to their domestic partners.
  80. "Lexington Officials Approve Domestic Partner Benefits". wuky.org. November 22, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2013. Officials in Lexington have voted to extend domestic partner benefits to city employees.
  81. "City To Offer Domestic Partner Benefits" (Press release). City of Louisville, Kentucky. July 15, 2011. Archived from the original on October 4, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  82. "City Council Passes Controversial Domestic Partners Ordinance". chattanoogan.com. November 12, 2013.
  83. "Collegedale, Tenn., approves benefits for same-sex spouses". timesfreepress.com. August 6, 2013.
  84. "Knoxville expanding employee benefits to same-sex, domestic partners". WBIR. October 17, 2013. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013.
  85. Cass, Michael (17 June 2014). "Metro Council approves domestic partner benefits". The Tennessean . Retrieved 10 February 2015.
  86. "Civil Marriage Equality and Religious Freedom Act of 2013, House Bill No. 75, 147th General Assembly, State of Delaware". Legis.delaware.gov. 2013-07-01. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  87. "Domestic Partnership". City of Takoma Park. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  88. "City Clerk". City of Asheville. Archived from the original on April 15, 2012. Retrieved April 4, 2012. On Feb. 22 [2011], City Council authorized the creation of a Domestic Partner Registry to recognize same-sex relationships.
  89. "North Carolina Family Policy Council: Buncombe Domestic Partner Benefits". CitizenLink. March 26, 2013. Retrieved May 8, 2012. Buncombe County is now the fourth county in North Carolina to offer domestic partner benefits to the unmarried opposite sex and same-sex partners of county employees. In a 4 to 3 vote on March 19, the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners approved a policy that "extends benefits and leave policy coverage to same and opposite sex domestic partners" to employees of Buncombe County. The benefits include health insurance, life insurance and family leave benefits allowed by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.
  90. 1 2 3 "May North Carolina Local Government Employers Offer Domestic Partner Benefits?" (PDF). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. November 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2012. In North Carolina, only Durham and Orange counties, the cities of Durham and Greensboro, and the towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro offer domestic partner benefits.
  91. "9:00 A.M. Worksession - Agenda". Durham County Government. September 2, 2003. Retrieved April 4, 2012. In conjunction with the County Attorney's legal opinion that only same-sex domestic partner benefits can be offered to County employees without the violation of the Commissioners' oaths of office, the Human Resources Department has completed the actions necessary to make this offering possible.
  92. "Human Resources Policy and Procedures" (PDF). Mecklenburg County Government. March 15, 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 26, 2010. Retrieved April 4, 2012. Mecklenburg County is committed to equal and nondiscriminatory treatment for employees in the administration of benefits programs, including the extension of benefits to same-gender domestic partners.
  93. "Atlanta suburb approves domestic partnership registry". Washington Blade. July 24, 2013.
  94. "Domestic Partnership". Archived from the original on 2017-06-06. Retrieved 2017-06-21.
  95. "Decatur City Commission Approves Domestic Partnership Registry". decatur.patch.com. December 17, 2013.
  96. "Savannah approves domestic partner benefits". thegavoice.com. October 15, 2010.
  97. "Article VIII. Domestic Partnership Act". Broward County. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  98. "Welcome to City of Cape Coral, Florida". Archived from the original on 2017-12-23. Retrieved 2017-12-23.
  99. "Domestic Partnership Registry and Information". City of Clearwater. Archived from the original on August 4, 2013. Retrieved August 6, 2012.
  100. "Domestic Partnership Registration". City of Gainesville. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  101. "Domestic partner registry approved in Hillsborough, despite crowd opposition". Tampa Bay Times. October 15, 2014.
  102. "Domestic Partnership Information". City of Key West. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  103. 1 2 Patterson, Fallan (September 16, 2011). "Council OKs domestic partner benefits". Osceola News-Gazette . Retrieved March 29, 2012. St. Cloud followed Kissimmee's lead Sept. 8 and approved domestic partner benefits for city employees
  104. "Section VI: Benefits" (PDF). Leon County. August 2010. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  105. 1 2 3 Joseph, Chris (2014-05-09). "Margate City Commission Approves Same-Sex Health Benefits". Blogs.browardpalmbeach.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  106. "APM 1-09: Domestic Partnerships" (PDF). City of Miami. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2014. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  107. "Miami Beach Domestic Partnership Registry". City of Miami Beach. Archived from the original on 2013-11-15. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  108. "Article IX. Domestic Partners and Family Health Coverage". Miami-Dade County. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  109. "Personnel Policies & Procedures Manual". Monroe County. December 14, 2011. Retrieved March 6, 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  110. Damron, David (February 21, 2012). "Orange leaders agree to domestic-partner registry". Orlando Sentinel . Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  111. "City of Orlando Domestic Partnership Registration Affidavit" (PDF). City of Orlando. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 27, 2012. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  112. "Domestic Partnership". Clerk & Comptroller, Palm Beach County. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  113. "Pensacola City Council OKs domestic partnerships 8-1". pnj.com. Retrieved 2013-12-13.
  114. "Pinellas County approves domestic partner registry". Tampabay.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  115. Lucas Seiler (2014-05-28). "Pinellas County approves domestic partner registry". Nbc-2.com. Retrieved 2014-06-29.
  116. "Declaration of Domestic Partnership" (PDF). City of Sarasota. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2014. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  117. "Sarasota County OKs domestic partner registry". heraldtribune.com. Retrieved 2013-11-14.
  118. "Ordinance No: 01-10-2026" (PDF). City of South Miami. January 14, 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  119. Langley, Alli (June 8, 2012). "St. Petersburg creates domestic partnership registry". Tampa Bay Times . Archived from the original on July 11, 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2012.
  120. "Domestic Partnership Registry". City of Tampa. Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2012.
  121. "Domestic Partnership Registry". Volusia County Revenue Division. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  122. "Domestic Partnership". City of West Palm Beach. Retrieved 2013-11-14.