Same-sex marriage in Guam

Last updated

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Guam since June 9, 2015 in accordance with a ruling from the District Court of Guam on June 5 that the territory's prohibition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Guam was the first territory of the United States to recognize same-sex marriage. On August 27, 2015, the Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015 passed by the Guam Legislature came into effect, officially incorporating the federal court ruling into statutory law.

Contents

Marriage statutes

Early legislation

The Guam Organic Act of 1950 , an Act of the United States Congress, does not address the question of marriage. Since August 2015, Guam's marriage statutes have recognised the marriages of same-sex couples. Previously, a 1994 law specifying the responsibilities of the Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services defined marriage as the "union of a man and a woman". That law, which contained a prohibition on marriage "between uncles and nieces or aunts and nephews", arguably showed Guam anticipated recognising only opposite-sex marriages. The law stipulated that parties "must declare in the presence of the person solemnizing the marriage that they take each other as husband and wife." With respect to marriages from other jurisdictions, the statutes stated: [1]

All marriages contracted outside of the territory of Guam, which would be valid by the laws of the country in which the same were contracted, are valid in the territory of Guam.

The 1994 law, which set standards and procedures for the Department of Public Health and Social Services, included this definition: [2] [3]

Marriage means the legal union of persons of opposite sex. The legality of the union may be established by civil or religious regulations, as recognized by the laws of Guam.

Federal courts in Guam are subject to the precedents set in 2014 by the decisions of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter and Sevcik v. Sandoval , which found Idaho's and Nevada's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional. The District Court of Guam noted this precedent in its June 2015 ruling permanently enjoining Guam officials from enforcing the 1994 law "or any other laws or regulations to the extent they prohibit otherwise qualified same-sex couples from marrying in Guam". [4]

2015 equality legislation

Following the District Court of Guam's June 2015 ruling permanently enjoining Guam officials from enforcing the 1994 law banning same-sex marriage and the U.S Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges , Guam legislators on August 12, 2015 passed the Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015, which created legal equality in civil marriage. The bill passed by a margin of 13–2 in the Legislature of Guam. [5] [6] [7] It took effect on August 27, 2015. [8]

August 12, 2015 vote in the Legislature of Guam
PartyVoted forVoted againstAbstained
  Democratic Party
2
–
  Republican Party
6
––
Total1320

The law amended the definition of marriage in Guam law to the following: [9]

Marriage means the legal union between two persons without regard to gender. The legality of the union may be established by civil or religious regulations, as recognized by the laws of Guam [10 Guam Code Annotated § 3207 (h)]

Proposed legislation

Recognition of same-sex relationships in Oceania Marriage Marriages performed elsewhere are recognized (American Samoa) No recognition of same-sex couples Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples (Palau, Tuvalu) Same-sex sexual activity illegal, but ban not enforced Same-sex sexual activity illegal (Country names will appear with mouse-overs when map is viewed at full size. Encircling lines are the exclusive economic zones of each state.) v t e Same-sex marriage map Oceania.svg
Recognition of same-sex relationships in Oceania
  Marriage
  Marriages performed elsewhere are recognized (American Samoa)
  No recognition of same-sex couples
  Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples (Palau, Tuvalu)
  Same-sex sexual activity illegal, but ban not enforced
  Same-sex sexual activity illegal
(Country names will appear with mouse-overs when map is viewed at full size. Encircling lines are the exclusive economic zones of each state.)

Legislation to permit civil unions (Chamorro : unikon sibit, pronounced [uniˈkonsiˈbit] ) was first discussed in the mid 2000s. After Vermont enacted same-sex marriage legislation in 2009, the 27th Guam Youth Congress, an advisory body which submits legislation to committees of the Legislature of Guam, forwarded a bill to legalize civil unions, with the bill being supported by Speaker Derick Baza Hills. A similar measure failed in the 25th Guam Youth Congress by just one vote. Citing recent rulings in the courts such as the unanimous decision overturning the ban on same-sex marriage in Iowa, Hills later commented that the courts would be essential to make sure we "allow for equal rights". [10] [11] While same-sex marriage was then not being considered in Guam, Hills made sure to point out that "We do have advocates in the Legislature [who support same-sex civil unions] ... I do feel and know that there are senators comfortable supporting this legislation". Hills called on the Legislature to introduce legislation to create such unions, though the extent of rights to be granted was unknown. [10]

On June 3, 2009, Vice-Speaker Benjamin Cruz introduced Bill No. 138, which would have established same-sex civil unions providing all of the rights and benefits of civil marriage. [12] [13] The bill was heavily condemned by the Catholic Church, [14] and it did not get sufficient votes to make it to the session floor. [15] Due to opposition to the bill within the religious community, Bill No. 185 and Bill No. 212 were introduced by proponents of same-sex unions should the civil union bill fail to pass. Bill No. 212 mirrored the bill passed in Hawaii that provided significantly limited rights. It would have established a "Designated Beneficiary Agreement", and unlike civil unions, would have been open to both same-sex and opposite-sex couples. [16] [17] Both bills also failed to pass.

Licensing same-sex marriage

On April 8, 2015, a lesbian couple were refused a marriage license by the Department of Public Health and Social Services. The next day, the editorial board of the Pacific Daily News endorsed the legalization of same-sex marriage in Guam. [18] Attorney General Elizabeth Barrett-Anderson endorsed the Department's refusal, but when later asked if Guam law violated the Fourteenth Amendment said: "Good question. I can't comment". [19] The couple filed a lawsuit challenging the territory's refusal to grant them a marriage license, Aguero v. Calvo, in the District Court of Guam on April 13. [20]

On April 15, 2015, Attorney General Barrett-Anderson ordered Guam officials to begin licensing same-sex marriages. Barrett-Anderson issued a directive to the Department of Public Health and Social Services to immediately begin processing marriage applications from same-sex couples, instructing that same-sex applicants be treated "with dignity and equality under the Constitution". She cited the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter , which is controlling precedent on federal courts in Guam. [21] However, Governor Eddie Calvo responded the next day by questioning the legal basis for Barrett-Anderson's memorandum. He suggested same-sex marriage licensing should wait until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a case before it. [22] Governor Calvo said the question of marriage should be addressed by the Legislature or voters of Guam, and the acting head of the Department of Public Health and Social Services said his office would not accept applications from same-sex couples seeking marriage licenses for the time being.

On May 8, the Chief Judge of the District Court of Guam, Frances Tydingco-Gatewood, denied the defendants' request to delay proceedings pending action by the U.S. Supreme Court in related cases. She set a briefing schedule and scheduled a hearing for June 5. [23] [24] On June 5, Judge Tydingco-Gatewood issued a ruling striking down Guam's statutory ban on same-sex marriage. The ruling was issued immediately after the court proceedings and went into effect on Tuesday, June 9. Same-sex marriages became performable and recognized in the U.S. territory from that date. Attorneys representing the government said in a May 18 court filing that "should a court strike current Guam law, they would respect and follow such a decision". [25] On June 9, 2015, Loretta Pangelinan, 28, and Kathleen Aguero, 29, plaintiffs in Aguero, were the first of several same-sex couples to receive a marriage license in the territory's capital, Hagåtña. [26] The first couple to marry was Deasia Johnson of Killeen, Texas and Nikki Dismuke of New Orleans, Louisiana, who were married in a brief ceremony in the office of Public Health Director James Gillan on the morning on June 9, the day the island became the United States' first overseas territory to recognize same-sex marriage. [27]

Marriage statistics

139 same-sex couples married on the island between June 2015 and October 2016. 67 of these couples were Guam residents, while 12 were from the Philippines, 9 from Taiwan, 6 from the state of California and 5 each from Hong Kong and the Northern Mariana Islands. There were also couples from Honduras, Italy, Malaysia, Russia, South Korea and the Netherlands. [28] 363 same-sex marriages had taken place in Guam by March 2019. [29]

In October 2016, the Guam Visitors Bureau began marketing Guam as a same-sex marriage destination in hopes of attracting same-sex couples seeking to marry to the island. [30]

Public opinion

In a 2009 poll conducted by the Pacific Daily News , 26% of Guam residents supported same-sex marriage, 27% supported same-sex domestic partnerships or civil unions, and 29% of responders said that there should be no legal recognition of same-sex relationships in Guam. [31]

An April 2015 poll conducted by students from the University of Guam found a 55% majority in favor of same-sex marriage, while 29% were opposed and 16% had no opinion on the issue. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil union</span> Legal union similar to marriage

A civil union is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, created primarily as a means to provide recognition in law for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in the United States</span>

The availability of legally recognized same-sex marriage in the United States expanded from one state (Massachusetts) in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015 through various court rulings, state legislation, and direct popular votes. States each have separate marriage laws, which must adhere to rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States that recognize marriage as a fundamental right guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as first established in the 1967 landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Yukon</span>

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Yukon since July 14, 2004, immediately following a ruling from the Supreme Court of Yukon. This made the territory the fourth jurisdiction in Canada, and the seventh in the world after the Netherlands, Belgium, Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec and Massachusetts, to legalise same-sex marriage. Yukon was the first of Canada's three territories to legalise same-sex marriage, and the only one to do so before the federal legalisation of same-sex marriage in July 2005 by the Parliament of Canada.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in New Jersey since October 21, 2013, the effective date of a trial court ruling invalidating the state's restriction of marriage to persons of different sexes. In September 2013, Mary C. Jacobson, Assignment Judge of the Mercer Vicinage of the Superior Court, ruled that as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in United States v. Windsor, the Constitution of New Jersey requires the state to recognize same-sex marriages. The Windsor decision held that the federal government was required to provide the same benefits to same-sex couples who were married under state law as to other married couples. Therefore, the state court reasoned in Garden State Equality v. Dow that, because same-sex couples in New Jersey were limited to civil unions, which are not recognized as marriages under federal law, the state must permit civil marriage for same-sex couples. This ruling, in turn, relied on the 2006 decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Lewis v. Harris that the state was constitutionally required to afford the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. The Supreme Court had ordered the New Jersey Legislature to correct the constitutional violation, by permitting either same-sex marriage or civil unions with all the rights and benefits of marriage, within 180 days. In response, it passed a bill to legalize civil unions on December 21, 2006, which became effective on February 19, 2007.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage and legal recognition of same-sex couples worldwide. It begins with the history of same-sex unions during ancient times, which consisted of unions ranging from informal and temporary relationships to highly ritualized unions, and continues to modern-day state-recognized same-sex marriage. Events concerning same-sex marriages becoming legal in a country or in a country's state are listed in bold.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Australia since 9 December 2017. Legislation to allow it, the Marriage Amendment Act 2017, passed the Parliament of Australia on 7 December 2017 and received royal assent from Governor-General Peter Cosgrove the following day. The law came into effect on 9 December, immediately recognising overseas same-sex marriages. The first same-sex wedding under Australian law was held on 15 December 2017. The passage of the law followed a voluntary postal survey of all Australians, in which 61.6% of respondents supported legalisation of same-sex marriage.

In response to court action in a number of states, the United States federal government and a number of state legislatures passed or attempted to pass legislation either prohibiting or allowing same-sex marriage or other types of same-sex unions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Hawaii</span>

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Hawaii since December 2, 2013. The Hawaii State Legislature held a special session beginning on October 28, 2013, and passed the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act legalizing same-sex marriage. Governor Neil Abercrombie signed the legislation on November 13, and same-sex couples began marrying on December 2, making Hawaii the fifteenth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. Hawaii also allows both same-sex and opposite-sex couples to formalize their relationships legally in the form of civil unions and reciprocal beneficiary relationships. Civil unions provide the same rights, benefits, and obligations of marriage at the state level, while reciprocal beneficiary relationships provide a more limited set of rights. When Hawaii's civil union law took effect at the start of 2012, same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions were considered civil unions in Hawaii.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Illinois since a law signed by Governor Pat Quinn on November 20, 2013 took effect on June 1, 2014. Same-sex marriage legislation was introduced in successive sessions of the Illinois General Assembly from 2007 to 2013. It passed the Senate in February 2013, but legislators delayed a vote in the House while lobbying for votes until November 5, 2013, when the House passed an amended version of the bill by a narrow margin. The Senate quickly approved the amended bill and Governor Quinn signed it into law on November 20. The law went into effect (statewide) on June 1, 2014, with same-sex couples able to apply for marriage licenses and then marry after the mandatory one-day waiting period. Illinois was the nineteenth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in American Samoa</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) people in American Samoa face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity became legal in the territory in 1980, but same-sex couples may not marry. Same-sex couples married legally in other jurisdictions are recognized and must be treated equally under US federal law since 13 December 2022. American Samoa remains the only part of the United States along with select Native American tribal jurisdictions to enforce a ban on same-sex couples marrying.

Same-sex marriage is not currently performed in American Samoa, though same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions are recognized. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees same-sex couples the right to marry. The ruling legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in the United States; however, it is uncertain how the ruling applies to American Samoa as the territory is unincorporated and unorganized. In July 2015, Governor Lolo Matalasi Moliga said he believed that the Supreme Court's ruling does not apply to American Samoa.

Same-sex marriage is legal in the Australian Capital Territory, and in the rest of Australia, after the Federal Parliament legalised same-sex marriage in December 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Guam</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Guam have improved significantly in recent years. Same-sex sexual activity has not been criminalized since 1978, and same-sex marriage has been allowed since June 2015. The U.S. territory now has discrimination protections in employment for both sexual orientation and gender identity. Additionally, federal law has provided for hate crime coverage since 2009. Gender changes are legal in Guam, provided the applicant has undergone sex reassignment surgery.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

<i>Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act 2013</i> Former Australian Capital Territory legislation

The Marriage Equality Act 2013 was an act of parliament of the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly that was intended to legalise same-sex marriage in the ACT. It was first presented to the ACT Legislative Assembly on 19 September 2013 by the ACT Attorney-General, Simon Corbell. The law intended to build on the existing recognition of same-sex unions in the Australian Capital Territory, which included recognition of de facto partners, civil partnerships and same-sex-only civil unions. The Act was passed in the Legislative Assembly on 22 October 2013. It came into operation on 7 November although wedding ceremonies under the provisions of the Act did not occur until 7 December 2013.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in the United States Virgin Islands since July 9, 2015, as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry under the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, legalizing same-sex marriage in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBTQ rights that took place in the year 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania</span>

Debate has occurred throughout Oceania over proposals to legalize same-sex marriage as well as civil unions.

Same-sex marriage is currently not recognised nor performed in Bermuda, a British Overseas Territory, but it was legal between 2017 and 2022. However, marriages performed during that period remain valid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia</span>

Debate has occurred throughout Asia over proposals to legalize same-sex marriage as well as civil unions.

References

  1. ↑ "Chapter 3. The Contract of Marriage" (PDF). Guam Code Annotated. Compiler of Laws, Supreme Court of Guam. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 3, 2014. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  2. ↑ Raymundo, Shawn (April 17, 2015). "1994 law central to marriage debate". Guam Pacific Daily News. Archived from the original on April 16, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  3. ↑ "Chapter 3. Public Health and Social Services" (PDF). Guam Code Annotated. Compiler of Laws, Supreme Court of Guam. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 16, 2015. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
  4. ↑ "Summary Judgement of the District Court of Guam in the matter of Aguero v. Calvo" (PDF). District Court of Guam. June 8, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  5. ↑ Salas Matanane, Sabrina (August 12, 2015). "Senators Vote During Session". K.U.A.M News. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  6. ↑ Ridgell, Clynt (August 12, 2015). "Marriage Equality and Employment Nondiscrimination Acts Pass". Pacific News Centre. Archived from the original on January 27, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  7. ↑ Raymundo, Shawn (August 12, 2015). "Legislature passes Marriage Equality Act". Guam Pacific Daily News. Archived from the original on August 14, 2015. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  8. ↑ Sablan, Jerick (August 27, 2015). "Guam's marriage equality legislation lapses into law". Guam Pacific Daily News. Archived from the original on May 27, 2024. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  9. ↑ "Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015" (PDF). Legislature of Guam. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2017. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  10. 1 2 "Bill No. 138, An Act To Amend Chapter 3 of Title 19 of the Guam Code Annotated; Relative to the Legalization of Same Sex Civil Unions Within the Territory of the Island of Guam" (PDF). Legislature of Guam. Retrieved August 13, 2022.
  11. ↑ "Opinions vary on same-sex civil union bill". Kuam News. June 12, 2009.
  12. ↑ Same-sex civil unions proposed
  13. ↑ "Bill No. 138 - An act to amend Chapter 3 of Title 19 of the Guam Code Annotated; relative to the legalization of same sex civil unions within the territory of the island of Guam" (PDF). Guam Legislature. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  14. ↑ "Archbishop Apuron Responds To Senator Cruz's Same Sex Civil Union Bill". Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved June 4, 2009.
  15. ↑ Aguon, Mindy (February 24, 2011). "Gay community hopeful for Guam civil unions". Kuam News. Archived from the original on January 27, 2016. Retrieved August 27, 2013.
  16. ↑ "Bill No. 30-185 (COR) – An act to add a new Chapter 16, Title 19, Guam Code Annotated; relative to Domestic Partnerships" (PDF). Guam Legislature. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 9, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  17. ↑ "Bill No. 212-30 (LS) - An Act to add a new Chapter 16 to Division 1 of Title 19, Guam Code Annotated, relativ to the establishment of Designated Beneficiary Agreements; and citing this Act as the "Designated Beneficiary Agreement Act of 2009"" (PDF). Guam Legislature. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 17, 2017. Retrieved January 17, 2017.
  18. ↑ "Rectify: Legalizing same-sex marriage is about justice and equality". Guam Pacific Daily News. April 9, 2015. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  19. ↑ "Guam AG says she'll answer questions on same-sex marriage at 'a later time'". Guam Pacific Daily News. April 10, 2015. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  20. ↑ "Complaint". Scribd,com. District Court of Guam. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved April 13, 2015.
  21. ↑ Geidner, Chris (April 15, 2015). "Guam Attorney General Calls For Marriage Equality "Immediately," Other State Officials Hold Off". BuzzFeed . Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
  22. ↑ Salas Matanane, Sabrina (April 17, 2015). "Governor Calvo needs more time on same-sex marriage". KUAM. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
  23. ↑ Daly, Kyle (May 8, 2015). "Judge grants extension in Guam gay marriage case, but denies stay". Guam Pacific Daily News. Archived from the original on May 13, 2015. Retrieved May 9, 2015.
  24. ↑ "Guam Gay Marriage Case To Proceed This Month". The Huffington Post . Associated Press. May 8, 2015. Archived from the original on November 24, 2015. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
  25. ↑ "Guam becomes first US territory to recognise same-sex marriage". The Guardian . Associated Press. June 5, 2015. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  26. ↑ "Gay couples begin applying to marry in Guam". The Guardian. Associated Press. June 9, 2015. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  27. ↑ Grace Garces Bordallo (June 9, 2015). "First gay couple to marry in US territory ties knot in Guam". seattlepi.com. Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 27, 2015.
  28. ↑ Quintanilla, Ken (October 16, 2016). "GVB sees big opportunity in marketing Guam as same-sex marriage destination". KUAM-TV . Archived from the original on October 31, 2016. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
  29. ↑ "Same-sex couple from Japan to get married in Guam". Yahoo!. September 25, 2019.
  30. ↑ GVB sees big opportunity in marketing Guam as same-sex marriage destination
  31. ↑ "Marriage equality USA: Guam". Marriage Equality USA. Archived from the original on October 31, 2016. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
  32. ↑ UOG Poll: 55% Support Gay Marriage, Pacific News Center, April 22, 2015
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.