Same-sex marriage in Iowa

Last updated

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Iowa since a decision of the Iowa Supreme Court on April 3, 2009. Marriage licenses became available to same-sex couples on April 27. [1] This ruling was the result of a lawsuit filed in 2005 by six same-sex couples who had been denied marriage licenses in Polk County. In 2007, the Polk County District Court ruled in favor of the couples in Varnum v. Brien . Two couples were married on September 2, 2007, before the ruling was stayed and appealed. [2] On April 3, 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously upheld the lower court's ruling, making Iowa the third U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. [lower-alpha 1]

Contents

Polling suggests that a majority of Iowans support the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, with a 2023 Public Religion Research Institute poll showing that 75% of respondents supported same-sex marriage. [3]

Background

In 1998, following court decisions on same-sex unions in other states that suggested that denying the right to marry to same-sex couples was incompatible with the equal protection clause of a state constitution like Iowa's, Iowa legislators who hoped to avoid a similar court challenge tried without success to pass a statute to prohibit same-sex marriages. [4] [5]

Varnum v. Brien

Proceedings and ruling

Six same-sex couples in Polk County represented by Lambda Legal sought the right to marry their same-sex partners in Iowa. They brought suit in 2005 arguing that denying them marriage licenses violated the liberty and equal protection clauses of the State Constitution. Judge Robert Hanson of Polk County District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on August 30, 2007. The next morning, Hanson stayed his decision pending an appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court. [6] [7] Within two hours after the district court published its ruling, two men from Des Moines submitted an application for marriage to the county recorder and their application was accepted. The next morning, several other couples applied for marriage licenses before Hanson issued his stay. Iowa marriage law requires a three-day waiting period between the initial application for a marriage license and the time the marriage becomes official, unless this waiting period is waived by a judge. [8] Sean Fritz and Tim McQuillan, residents of Ames and students at Iowa State University, were the only couple to receive such a waiver before Hanson issued his stay. After receiving the waiver and applying for a marriage license on the morning of August 31, the couple was married in a short ceremony that morning by a Unitarian Universalist minister on the minister's front lawn in Des Moines. [9]

Terry Lowman and Mark Kassis exchanging wedding vows at the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship in Ames on Sunday, September 2, 2007 Terryandmarkwedding.jpg
Terry Lowman and Mark Kassis exchanging wedding vows at the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship in Ames on Sunday, September 2, 2007

That's a win. It's not a final win, because the case is being appealed. But just a few years ago if people were asked if we could get a judge in Iowa to strike down the exclusion from marriage, right there in the heartland, I think most people would have said we couldn't.

—  Evan Wolfson of Freedom to Marry on the 2007 decision [10]

Two other Ames residents who applied for a marriage license before the stay, Terry Lowman and Mark Kassis, were married on September 2 in a ceremony at the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Ames. [11] Lowman and Kassis' three-day waiting period was waived by a judge; however, Hanson's stay occurred before the couple was able to record the marriage license. However, it is legal opinion that the marriage is legal in Iowa. [8]

Upon appeal, a unanimous Iowa Supreme Court affirmed Hanson's ruling in Varnum v. Brien on April 3, 2009. Using the standard known as intermediate scrutiny to evaluate the state's justifications for denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples, the court determined that denying a marriage licenses on the basis of sexual orientation violated the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution. [12] Licenses were originally to be available 21 days after the ruling on April 24, but the availability of licenses was postponed until April 27 due to a furlough day. [13]

Despite the ruling in Varnum, the Iowa Department of Public Health had refused to recognize same-sex marriages when completing birth and death certificates. On December 12, 2012, ruling in Buntemeyer v. Iowa Department of Public Health, a state court ordered the department to list the names of two women, a married lesbian couple, on the death certificate of their stillborn son. [14] The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments that same day in the department's appeal of a decision in Gartner v. Newton that ordered it to enter the names of two women as parents on a birth certificate. [15] On May 3, 2013, the court unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling in Gartner and said that "by naming the nonbirthing spouse on the birth certificate of a married lesbian couple's child, the child is ensured support from that parent and the parent establishes fundamental legal rights at the moment of birth". [16]

Judicial retention elections

Rally supporting the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell in Iowa City, June 26, 2015 Marriage Equality Celebration (18571348824).jpg
Rally supporting the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell in Iowa City, June 26, 2015

On November 2, 2010, Iowa Supreme Court justices David L. Baker, Michael Streit and Marsha Ternus, who participated in the unanimous 2009 ruling that Iowa could not deny marriage licenses based on sexual orientation, were removed from office after judicial retention elections. [17] Their removal followed campaigning by groups opposed to same-sex marriage including the National Organization for Marriage. [18] The three judges did no campaigning on their own behalf, but were supported by numerous third parties. [19] On November 6, 2012, Justice David Wiggins won retention in an election, largely due to the fact that Iowa had reversed its opposition to same-sex marriage, now showing majority support. [20]

In June 2015, Streit and Baker expressed support for Obergefell v. Hodges , the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in the United States. Baker said, "I think it just shows that we were a little bit ahead of our time in anticipating this result." Streit added, "I think all seven of us are very proud of what we did. Has marriage been lessened because of what we did? No, and in the U.S. all people will be able to enjoy the freedoms of America and be treated as equal citizens under our law." Reacting to the Obergefell ruling, Kate Varnum, plaintiff in Varnum, said, "To think how far we've come in the past 10 years since we filed the lawsuit in Iowa - it's incredible." Governor Terry Branstad said he was "disappointed" with Obergefell and called for the passage of a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, but acknowledged that such an amendment has "virtually no chance of [succeeding]". [21]

Attempts to pass constitutional ban

Opponents of same-sex marriage holding a rally and a press conference at the Iowa State Capitol, March 2011 Marriage rally and press conference 022 (6854294004).jpg
Opponents of same-sex marriage holding a rally and a press conference at the Iowa State Capitol, March 2011

State constitutional amendments to ban same-sex marriage were proposed several times in the Iowa General Assembly in the wake of the judicial rulings. [5] To amend the Constitution of Iowa, two consecutive sessions of the Assembly would need to approve the amendment, after which it would be placed on the ballot for final approval by the Iowa electorate. [22]

An amendment was first proposed in 2008 but did not pass. [5] The Assembly did not vote on a constitutional amendment in 2009, and Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal said he would not allow one to be brought to the floor in 2010. [23] In a joint press release with House Speaker Pat Murphy on April 3, 2009, Gronstal welcomed the court's decision, saying, "When all is said and done, we believe the only lasting question about today's events will be why it took us so long. It is a tough question to answer because treating everyone fairly is really a matter of Iowa common sense and Iowa common decency. Iowa has always been a leader in the area of civil rights." [24] Democratic leaders of the Iowa Senate and the Iowa House of Representatives during the 2009–2010 legislative session opposed a vote on an amendment. [25] In the next session, debate on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in Iowa attracted national news coverage after Zach Wahls, a college student and son of a lesbian couple, addressed the House Judiciary Committee in a public hearing on January 31, 2011. [26] A video of his testimony posted on YouTube went viral. [27] On February 1, 2011, with Republicans in the majority, the House passed House Joint Resolution 6 by a vote of 62–37. Democratic leaders promised to block debate in the Senate, which they did. [28]

Same-sex marriage could also have been banned by constitutional convention, which Iowa voters can initiate once a decade. On November 2, 2010, voters defeated a proposed constitutional convention by a 2–1 margin. [29]

In 2023, eight Republican lawmakers introduced two bills to the General Assembly; [lower-alpha 2] the first to add a same-sex marriage ban to the Iowa Constitution and the second to declare the Respect for Marriage Act , signed into law by President Joe Biden in December 2022, inoperable in Iowa. [30] The bills, which political experts and advocates widely considered unconstitutional, were not moved out of committee and died in March 2023. [31]

Native American nations

The Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa bans same-sex marriages. Its Tribal Code states that "only persons of the opposite gender may marry" on the reservation. However, the Code also states "all marriages performed other than as provided for in this Code, which are valid under the laws of the jurisdiction where and when performed, are valid within the jurisdiction of the Sac & Fox of the Mississippi in Iowa." [32]

While there are no records of same-sex marriages as understood from a Western perspective being performed in Native American cultures, there is evidence for identities and behaviours that may be placed on the LGBT spectrum. Many of these cultures recognized two-spirit individuals who were born male but wore women's clothing and performed everyday household work and artistic handiwork which were regarded as belonging to the feminine sphere. [33] Sauk two-spirit individuals, known as nîshwi manetôwaki, [34] characterized their gender role change as "an unfortunate destiny which they cannot avoid, being supposed to be impelled to this course by a vision from the female spirit that resides in the Moon." They were sacred and honored annually with a dance in which only those men who had had sexual intercourse with a nîshwi manetôwaki were allowed to participate. [33]

Economic impact

A 2008 study from the University of California, Los Angeles analyzed the impact of allowing same-sex couples to marry on Iowa's state budget. The study concluded that allowing same-sex couples to marry would result in a net gain of approximately $5.3 million each year for the state. [35] This net impact would be the result of savings in expenditures on state means-tested public benefit programs and an increase in state income and sales tax revenue.

Marriage statistics

Melisa Keeton and Shelley Wolfe marrying in Des Moines on April 27, 2009 following the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling in Varnum Marriage Day (3479672253).jpg
Melisa Keeton and Shelley Wolfe marrying in Des Moines on April 27, 2009 following the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling in Varnum

Between April 2009 and March 2010, 2,020 same-sex couples were married in Iowa, accounting for 10.1% of all marriages conducted in the state during that period. Only 815 couples were from Iowa, with the rest being from out of state, predominantly from neighboring Illinois, Missouri and Nebraska. [36]

By June 26, 2015, the day the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in Obergefell v. Hodges, approximately 11,000 same-sex couples had married in Iowa, [21] mostly in Polk, Scott, Johnson, Pottawattamie and Linn counties.

Number of marriages in Iowa
YearSame-sex marriagesTotal marriages % same-sex
FemaleMaleTotal
20091,1386451,78321,1398.43%
20101,0825121,59420,8807.63%
20118854171,30220,5676.33%
20128963511,24720,9865.94%
20132,0741,3233,39722,84114.87%
20141,1356781,81321,3278.50%
201533619853419,5402.73%
201628113441519,2772.15%
2017 [37] 25513038519,4271.98%
201822611033618,1091.86%
201919112131217,0491.83%
202023411334715,5082.24%
2021 [38] 2279632317,0221.90%
2022 [39] 26414140516,6612.43%

The 2020 U.S. census showed that there were 4,349 married same-sex couple households (1,681 male couples and 2,668 female couples) and 3,274 unmarried same-sex couple households in Iowa. [40]

Public opinion

Public opinion for same-sex marriage in Iowa
Poll sourceDates administeredSample sizeMargin of errorSupportOppositionDo not know / refused
Public Religion Research Institute March 9 – December 7, 2023 207 adults ?60%35%5%
Public Religion Research Institute March 11 – December 14, 2022  ? ?75%20%5%
Public Religion Research Institute March 8 – November 9, 2021  ? ?72%23%5%
Public Religion Research Institute January 7 – December 20, 2020 528 adults ?62%30%8%
Public Religion Research Institute April 5 – December 23, 2017 895 adults ?59%33%8%
Public Religion Research Institute May 18, 2016 – January 10, 2017 1,325 adults ?59%31%10%
Public Religion Research Institute April 29, 2015 – January 7, 2016 1,103 adults ?56%35%9%
Public Religion Research Institute April 2, 2014 – January 4, 2015 681 adults ?57%37%6%
New York Times/CBS News/YouGov September 20 – October 1, 20142,359 likely voters± 2.2%53%33%14%
Public Policy Polling February 20–23, 2014869 voters± 3.3%47%44%9%
Public Policy Polling July 5–7, 2013668 registered voters± 3.8%46%45%9%
Public Policy Polling February 1–3, 2013846 voters ?46%43%11%
Public Policy Polling August 19–21, 2011798 voters± 3.5%46%45%9%

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ After Massachusetts and Connecticut, but excluding California which had constitutionally banned same-sex marriage in November 2008, but still recognized marriages performed between June and November 2008.
  2. ↑ The lawmakers were Brad Sherman, Luana Stoltenberg, Mark Cisneros, Helena Hayes, Zach Dieken, Skyler Wheeler, Phil Thompson, and Thomas Gerhold.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in the United States</span>

The availability of legally recognized same-sex marriage in the United States expanded from one state (Massachusetts) in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015 through various court rulings, state legislation, and direct popular votes. States each have separate marriage laws, which must adhere to rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States that recognize marriage as a fundamental right guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as first established in the 1967 landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia.

<i>Goodridge v. Department of Public Health</i> 2003 US state court case which legalized gay marriage in Massachusetts

Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941, is a landmark Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case in which the Court held that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the state to legally recognize same-sex marriage. The November 18, 2003, decision was the first by a U.S. state's highest court to find that same-sex couples had the right to marry. Despite numerous attempts to delay the ruling, and to reverse it, the first marriage licenses were issued to same-sex couples on May 17, 2004, and the ruling has been in full effect since that date.

Many laws in the history of the United States have addressed marriage and the rights of married people. Common themes addressed by these laws include polygamy, interracial marriage, divorce, and same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions</span>

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions of several different types passed, banning legal recognition of same-sex unions in U.S. state constitutions, referred to by proponents as "defense of marriage amendments" or "marriage protection amendments." These state amendments are different from the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban same-sex marriage in every U.S. state, and Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more commonly known as DOMA, which allowed the states not to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. The amendments define marriage as a union between one man and one woman and prevent civil unions or same-sex marriages from being legalized, though some of the amendments bar only the latter. The Obergefell decision in June 2015 invalidated these state constitutional amendments insofar as they prevented same-sex couples from marrying, even though the actual text of these amendments remain written into the state constitutions.

<i>Varnum v. Brien</i>

Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862, was an Iowa Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the state's limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples violated the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution. The case had the effect of legally recognizing same-sex marriage in Iowa. In 2007, a lower court had granted summary judgment in favor of six same-sex couples who sued Timothy Brien, Polk County Recorder, for refusing to grant them marriage licenses.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Wyoming since October 21, 2014. The U.S. state of Wyoming had previously prohibited state recognition of same-sex marriages by statute since 1977 and had enacted a more explicit ban in 2003. An attempt to enact legislation recognizing domestic partnerships as an alternative to marriage for same-sex couples failed in 2013. On October 17, 2014, a federal district court found the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Its ruling took effect on October 21 when state officials notified the court that they would not appeal the decision.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in South Carolina since a federal court order took effect on November 20, 2014. Another court ruling on November 18 had ordered the state to recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. Following the 2014 ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bostic v. Schaefer, which found Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional and set precedent on every state in the circuit, one judge accepted marriage license applications from same-sex couples until the South Carolina Supreme Court, in response to a request by the Attorney General, ordered him to stop. A federal district court ruled South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on November 12, with implementation of that decision stayed until noon on November 20. The first same-sex wedding ceremony was held on November 19.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Louisiana since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. The court held that the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples is unconstitutional, invalidating Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage. The ruling clarified conflicting court rulings on whether state officials are obligated to license same-sex marriages. Governor Bobby Jindal confirmed on June 28 that Louisiana would comply with the ruling once the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed its decision in a Louisiana case, which the Fifth Circuit did on July 1. Jindal then said the state would not comply with the ruling until the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana reversed its judgment, which it did on July 2. All parishes now issue marriage licenses in accordance with federal law.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Ohio since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, a landmark decision in which the court struck down the state's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriage on June 26, 2015. The case was named after plaintiff Jim Obergefell, who sued the state of Ohio after officials refused to recognize his marriage on the death certificate of his husband. Same-sex marriages were performed in Ohio beginning shortly after the Supreme Court released its ruling, as local officials implemented the order.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Alaska since October 12, 2014, with an interruption from October 15 to 17 while state officials sought without success to delay the implementation of a federal court ruling. The U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska held on October 12 in the case of Hamby v. Parnell that Alaska's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriage violated the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution. On October 15, state officials obtained a two-day stay from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which the U.S. Supreme Court refused to extend on October 17. Although Alaska is one of a few states which enforces a three-day waiting period between requesting a marriage license and conducting a marriage ceremony, at least one same-sex couple had the waiting period waived immediately after the district court's ruling. They married in Utqiagvik on October 13 and were the first same-sex couple to marry in Alaska.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Iowa</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Iowa have evolved significantly in the 21st century. Iowa began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on April 27, 2009 following a ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court, making Iowa the fourth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples may also adopt, and state laws ban discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Previously, the U.S. state of Texas had banned same-sex marriage both by statute since 1973 and in its State Constitution since 2005. On February 26, 2014, Judge Orlando Luis Garcia of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas found that Texas's ban on same-sex marriages was unconstitutional. On April 22, 2014, a state court came to the same conclusion. Both cases were appealed. The district court's decision was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, but before that court could issue a ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all same-sex marriage bans in the United States in Obergefell on June 26, 2015. Within a few months of the court ruling, all counties had started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, except for Irion County, which announced in 2020 that it would begin issuing licenses to same-sex couples, making it the last county in the United States to comply with the ruling.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Tennessee since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Governor Bill Haslam quickly announced that the state would abide by the court's decision, and same-sex couples began to marry in Tennessee. Previously, Tennessee had banned same-sex marriage both by statute and its State Constitution.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Missouri since the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which struck down state bans on marriages between two people of the same sex on June 26, 2015. Prior to the court ruling, the state recognized same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions pursuant to a state court ruling in October 2014, and certain jurisdictions of the state performed same-sex marriage despite a statewide ban.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Arkansas since the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, striking down same-sex marriage bans nationwide. Prior to this, same-sex marriage in Arkansas was briefly legal for a period beginning on May 9, 2014, as a result of a ruling by Sixth Judicial Circuit Judge Chris Piazza striking down the state's constitutional and statutory bans on same-sex marriage as violating the U.S. Constitution. Approximately 541 same-sex couples received marriage licenses in several counties before the Arkansas Supreme Court stayed his ruling pending appeal on May 16, 2014.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Puerto Rico since July 13, 2015, as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. On June 26, 2015, the court ruled that bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution. Same-sex couples could begin applying for marriage licenses on July 13, and the first marriages occurred on July 17, 2015.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with equal rights and responsibilities. Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by statute, court ruling, or voter initiative in 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in the U.S. state of Georgia since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Attorney General Sam Olens announced that Georgia would "adhere to the ruling of the Court", and the first couple married just one hour after the ruling was handed down. Previously, Georgia had banned same-sex marriage both by statute and its State Constitution.

In the United States, the history of same-sex marriage dates from the early 1940s, when the first lawsuits seeking legal recognition of same-sex relationships brought the question of civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples to public attention though they proved unsuccessful. However marriage wasn't a request for the LGBTQ movement until the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington (1987). The subject became increasingly prominent in U.S. politics following the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Miike that suggested the possibility that the state's prohibition might be unconstitutional. That decision was met by actions at both the federal and state level to restrict marriage to male-female couples, notably the enactment at the federal level of the Defense of Marriage Act.

References

  1. ↑ Corely, Matt (April 3, 2009). "BREAKING: Iowa Supreme Court Unanimously Upholds Same-Sex Marriage". ThinkProgress. Retrieved March 4, 2014.
  2. ↑ "Judge Overturns Iowa Ban on Same-Sex Marriages". The New York Times . Associated Press. August 31, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2007.
  3. ↑ Staff. "American Values Atlas". Public Religion Research Institute . Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  4. ↑ Iowa's governor-elect wants vote to ban gay marriage, criticizes senate leader
  5. 1 2 3 Linda Miller (March 10, 2008). "Funnel Week Survivors" . Retrieved March 11, 2008.
  6. ↑ "Iowa Gay Marriages Abruptly Halted". 365Gay.com . Associated Press. August 31, 2007. Archived from the original on September 11, 2007. Retrieved August 31, 2007.
  7. ↑ Henderson, Kay (August 31, 2007). "Ruling briefly allows gay marriage in Iowa". Reuters . Retrieved August 31, 2007.
  8. 1 2 "Judge Overturns Iowa Ban on Same-Sex Marriages". The New York Times . Des Moines, Iowa. August 31, 2007. Archived from the original on October 7, 2017.
  9. ↑ Miller, Kyle (September 4, 2007). "A window of opportunity". Iowa State Daily . Retrieved April 5, 2013.
  10. ↑ Interview with Evan Wolfson, David Shankbone, September 30, 2007
  11. ↑ Laura Pieper and Luke Jennett (September 1, 2007). "Lucullan's owners set Sunday as wedding date". The Ames Tribune . Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. Retrieved September 2, 2007.
  12. ↑ Des Moines Register staff (April 3, 2009). "Unanimous ruling: Iowa marriage no longer limited to one man, one woman". Des Moines Register . Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved April 3, 2009.
  13. ↑ Davey, Monica (April 27, 2009). "A Quiet Day in Iowa as Same-Sex Couples Line Up to Marry". New York Times. Retrieved October 22, 2012.
  14. ↑ Iowa District Court for Polk County, Buntemeyer v. Iowa DPH, December 12, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2012
  15. ↑ Danielson, Dar (December 12, 2012). "Supreme Court hears birth certificate case involving same-sex parents". Radio Iowa. Retrieved March 6, 2013.
  16. ↑ Neuman, Scott (May 3, 2013). "Iowa Court: List Both Same-Sex Parents On Birth Certificates". NPR. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  17. ↑ "Iowans Dismiss Three Justices". Des Moines Register. November 3, 2010. Archived from the original on July 28, 2012. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  18. ↑ Glover, Mike (October 25, 2010). "Gay Marriage Foes Back Push To Oust Iowa Justices". Boston.com. Associated Press. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  19. ↑ KCRG Intern (October 13, 2010). "Vote 2010: Group Targets Three Iowa Supreme Court Justices". Kcrg.com. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  20. ↑ "Secretary of State - Election Night Results - November 6th, 2012". Archived from the original on November 7, 2012. Retrieved November 7, 2012.
  21. 1 2 In six years prior to Friday's SCOTUS decision, more than 11,000 same-sex couples have wed in Iowa, The Gazette (Cedar Rapids) , June 26, 2015
  22. ↑ "Iowa Constitution, Article X, Section 1" . Retrieved September 11, 2008.
  23. ↑ Iowa Independent: Jason Hancock, "Gronstal: No gay marriage vote in 2010," December 31, 2009 Archived July 17, 2011, at the Wayback Machine , accessed June 1, 2012
  24. ↑ Iowa Supreme Court: Gay marriage ban illegal Archived January 11, 2013, at archive.today , Southwest Iowa News, April 3, 2009
  25. ↑ Glover, Mike (March 30, 2010). "A look at Iowa legislative session". Bloomberg Businessweek . Archived from the original on February 1, 2012. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  26. ↑ Zach Wahls: Transcript of testimony Archived May 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , accessed May 30, 2012
  27. ↑ AOL News: Steven Hoffer, "Zach Wahls' Iowa Speech for Gay Marriage Goes Viral," February 2, 2011 Archived September 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , accessed May 30, 2012
  28. ↑ Bolcer, Julie (February 1, 2011). "Iowa House Votes For Marriage Ban". Advocate.com. Archived from the original on October 10, 2011. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  29. ↑ Scott, Monica (October 11, 2010). "What other states have done about constitutional conventions". The Grand Rapids Press . Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  30. ↑ "GOP lawmakers propose amending Iowa Constitution to ban gay marriage". CBS2Iowa. Des Moines. February 28, 2023.
  31. ↑ Murphy, Erin (March 3, 2023). "Which Iowa bills survived, which ones died". The Gazette.
  32. ↑ "Title 6. Family Relations" (PDF). Meskwaki Nation. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
  33. 1 2 Sabine Lang (1998). Men as women, women as men: changing gender in Native American cultures . University of Texas Press. ISBN   0-292-74701-2.
  34. ↑ Whittaker, Gordon (2015). "A Concise Dictionary of the Sauk Language" (PDF). The Sac & Fox Nation. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 6, 2023.
  35. ↑ M.V. Lee Badgett, Amanda K. Baumle, Adam P. Romero, and Brad Sears, The Impact on Iowa's Budget of Allowing Same-Sex Couples to Marry (April 1, 2008). The Williams Institute.
  36. ↑ Tony Leys (May 18, 2010). "2,200 gay marriages in Iowa during past year | Des Moines Register Staff Blogs". Blogs.desmoinesregister.com. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  37. ↑ "2017 Vital Statistics of Iowa" (PDF). idph.iowa.gov. October 4, 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 17, 2019. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  38. ↑ "2021 Vital Statistics of Iowa" (PDF). Iowa Department of Health and Human Services. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 5, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  39. ↑ "2022 Vital Statistics of Iowa". Iowa Department of Health and Human Services. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  40. ↑ "PCT1405 Couple Households, By Type". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.