Same-sex marriage in New Jersey

Last updated

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in New Jersey since October 21, 2013, the effective date of a trial court ruling invalidating the state's restriction of marriage to persons of different sexes. In September 2013, Mary C. Jacobson, Assignment Judge of the Mercer Vicinage of the Superior Court, ruled that as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in United States v. Windsor , the Constitution of New Jersey requires the state to recognize same-sex marriages. [1] The Windsor decision held that the federal government was required to provide the same benefits to same-sex couples who were married under state law as to other married couples. Therefore, the state court reasoned in Garden State Equality v. Dow that, because same-sex couples in New Jersey were limited to civil unions, which are not recognized as marriages under federal law, the state must permit civil marriage for same-sex couples. This ruling, in turn, relied on the 2006 decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Lewis v. Harris that the state was constitutionally required to afford the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. The Supreme Court had ordered the New Jersey Legislature to correct the constitutional violation, by permitting either same-sex marriage or civil unions with all the rights and benefits of marriage, within 180 days. In response, it passed a bill to legalize civil unions on December 21, 2006, which became effective on February 19, 2007.

Contents

Following the trial court decision in Garden State Equality v. Dow, the Christie Administration asked the New Jersey Supreme Court to grant a stay of the decision pending appeal. On October 18, 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously denied the request for a stay. [2] Three days later, on the day the trial court ruling went into effect and local officials had begun issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and some wedding ceremonies had been performed, Governor Christie withdrew the state's appeal. This action removed the last potential impediment to same-sex marriages in the state. [3] New Jersey was the fourteenth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature passed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage, but it was vetoed by Governor Chris Christie. In January 2022, Governor Phil Murphy signed into law legislation to codify same-sex marriage into New Jersey statutes. [4] [5] [6]

Domestic partnerships

In 2004, New Jersey implemented a domestic partnership scheme. It was one of the first U.S. states to do so, after California. In 2006, advocates of same-sex unions sued to transcend domestic partnership in the case of Lewis v. Harris . The judges struck down the domestic partnership arrangement and split 4–3 to allow the New Jersey Legislature to pass civil unions instead of allowing same-sex marriage. In December 2006, the New Jersey Legislature passed a bill providing for civil unions and recognizing other states' civil unions.

The New Jersey Legislature enacted the Domestic Partnership Act on January 12, 2004, which came into effect on July 10, 2004. The law made domestic partnerships available to all same-sex couples, as well as to different-sex couples aged 62 and older. The domestic partnership statute provides "limited health care, inheritance, property rights and other rights and obligations" but "[does] not approach the broad array of rights and obligations afforded to married couples." [7] For example, as Lambda Legal stated, the law "required health and pension benefits [only] for state employees—it was voluntary for other employers—and did not require family leave to care for an ill partner." [8] The domestic partnership statute remains in place even though New Jersey subsequently enacted a civil union statute. Couples in an existing domestic partnership are not required to enter a civil union. However, new domestic partnerships are available only to couples in which both partners are 62 and over, whether same-sex or different-sex. [7] [8]

Civil unions

Lewis v. Harris

On October 25, 2006, the Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously ruled in Lewis v. Harris that the "unequal dispensation of rights and benefits to committed same-sex partners can no longer be tolerated under our State Constitution." With the Lewis decision, same-sex couples were granted the same rights, benefits and responsibilities as heterosexual couples with respect to their relationships. While the decision was widely reported as a 4–3 split, the differences between the justices were on whether only the provision of civil marriage rights to same-sex couples would resolve the constitutional defect, or whether another change in statute would pass constitutional scrutiny. The court avoided the question of what to call the legal status, leaving that to, as the majority stated, the "crucible of the democratic process".

The dissent, led by Chief Justice Deborah T. Poritz, chastised the junior members of the court who said that anything other than marriage would provide equal rights: "What we name things matters, language matters... Labels set people apart surely as physical separation on a bus or in school facilities... By excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage, the State declares that it is legitimate to differentiate between their commitments and the commitments of heterosexual couples. Ultimately the message is that what same-sex couples have is not as important or as significant as real marriage, that such lesser relationships cannot have the name of marriage." The court gave the New Jersey Legislature six months to enact legislation providing for civil unions.

Civil Union Act

On December 14, 2006, the New Jersey Legislature passed a bill providing for civil unions, [9] which was signed into law by Governor Jon Corzine on December 21, 2006. The Civil Union Act came into effect on February 19, 2007.

Same-sex couples who enter into a civil union are provided almost all of the rights granted to married couples under New Jersey state law. However, under the provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), same-sex couples in civil unions and domestic partnerships did not have any right or entitlement to the 1,138 rights that a married couple has under federal law. [10] Section 3 of DOMA, which prohibited the federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2013 in United States v. Windsor . According to the civil union law, [9] when a same-sex couple enters into a civil union, their domestic partnership is automatically terminated by the civil union. However, those couples who remain in domestic partnerships and elect to not enter into a civil union will be allowed to remain as domestic partners. New domestic partnerships can still be formed if both partners are 62 years of age or older.

The law provided for the creation of a Civil Unions Review Commission that would evaluate the law's effectiveness and any problems resulting therefrom, [9] and would report every six months for three years following enactment to assess the impact of the law. The first meeting of the Civil Unions Review Commission took place on June 18, 2007. The Commission elected a chair, Frank Vespa-Papaleo, the Director of the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights, and the Commission planned meeting monthly as well as conducting periodic public meetings. [11]

Civil unions in practice

The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) took a formal position against the adoption of the Civil Unions Act, citing inherent and obvious problems and confusion the law would have for citizens and legal representation. In addition, the NJSBA formally endorsed the marriage bill proposed by openly gay Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, saying that only same-sex marriage would meet the standard mandated by the Lewis decision. [12] [13]

A United Parcel Service (UPS) spokesman claimed that language in its collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters union prevented it from extending benefits to same-sex partners. [14] On July 20, 2007, Governor Jon Corzine sent a letter to UPS officials on behalf of a UPS driver and her partner, asking the company to comply with New Jersey law and extend spousal benefits such as health insurance to civil union partners. On July 30, a UPS spokesman said: "We have received clear guidance that, at least in New Jersey, the state truly views civil union partners as married. We've heard that loud and clear from state officials and we're happy to make this change." The company also noted that it already offers equal benefits to married same-sex couples in Massachusetts and would review its policies in Connecticut and Vermont. [15]

Prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage in New Jersey, all same-sex relationships (including marriages) contracted out of state were recognized as having the same legal force as New Jersey civil unions, where they "provide substantially all the rights and benefits of marriage", or as equivalent and having the same legal force as New Jersey domestic partnerships, where they "provide some but not all of the rights and obligations of marriage". [16]

Statistics

During the first 90 days after the law went into effect, 852 same-sex couples entered into civil unions, according to the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services. During the same period, the LGBT civil rights organization, Garden State Equality, reported that it had received complaints from 102 couples denied benefits by employers or insurers. On May 22, 2007, The Star-Ledger reported that the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights had received at least 270 inquiries from couples in civil unions denied benefits by employers or insurers. As of June 18, 2007, only two complaints had been filed with the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights, it was reported at the first meeting of the Civil Unions Review Commission. [17]

According to Garden State Equality, by the end of July 2007, 211 of the 1,358 couples who had entered New Jersey civil unions since February 19 had "reported to Garden State Equality that their employers refused to recognize their civil unions." [18] Among the companies flouting state law were shipping companies UPS, FedEx, and DHL, as well as a number of Fortune 500 companies.

By February 2008, 2,329 couples had entered into civil unions in the state. [13]

Same-sex marriage

2011 protest in Newark by Garden State Equality in support of same-sex marriage and against the deportation of LGBT spouses Garden State Equality May 2011 protest (5694200900).jpg
2011 protest in Newark by Garden State Equality in support of same-sex marriage and against the deportation of LGBT spouses

Background

Beginning on March 5, 2004, Kiki Tomek, the Deputy City Clerk of Asbury Park, processed marriage licenses for same-sex couples for several days. [19] Deputy Mayor James Bruno married one couple on March 8, but then heeded a warning from the New Jersey Attorney General, Peter C. Harvey, to stop issuing such licenses. [20]

A legislative commission was formed to review whether civil unions brought equality to same-sex couples. It determined that civil unions failed to provide equal treatment. On December 10, 2008, the Commission released its unanimous finding that marriage laws should be made gender-neutral to ensure equal treatment of same-sex couples. [21] Governor Corzine had indicated that he would sign a bill to allow same-sex marriage. [22] In late 2009, lame duck Governor Corzine stated that he would sign a bill legalizing same-sex marriage if it came to his desk before he left office, while his newly elected Republican successor Chris Christie said that he would promote a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. [22] [23] However, the political situation at the time made such an amendment unlikely, and Governor Christie later supported a public vote on same-sex marriage; while he was personally opposed to it, he promised not to revisit the same-sex marriage issue if it was legalized by popular vote. [24]

On July 26, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court declined a request on the part of the plaintiffs in Lewis v. Harris that it review whether the State Legislature had complied with the court's order in that case. It said it wanted the challenge to begin in a lower court where a trial record could be developed. [25]

Legislation

On December 7, 2009, the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee approved a same-sex marriage bill by a vote of 7 to 6, after seven hours of testimony and debate. It was amended in committee to clarify that clergy would not be required to perform weddings for same-sex couples. On January 7, 2010, the New Jersey Senate defeated the measure in a 20–14 vote. [26] [27]

On February 13, 2012, the Senate passed a bill legalizing same-sex marriage by a vote of 24 to 16, and on February 16, the Assembly passed it by a vote of 42 to 33, with three Republicans and one Democrat not voting, and one Democratic seat temporarily vacant. In neither house was the bill passed by a veto-proof majority. Governor Christie vetoed the bill the next day and called for a constitutional amendment for same-sex marriage to be presented to voters as a ballot referendum. [28] On February 21, 2013, Democratic leaders announced plans to hold a vote to override Christie's veto. The legislation needed three additional votes in the Senate and 12 in the House. [29] The State Legislature had until January 2014 to override the veto. [30] Democratic legislative leaders discussed the matter with Christie in July. Senate President Stephen Sweeney said Christie was intimidating some Republicans who supported same-sex marriage, and State Senator Barbara Buono, the Democratic candidate for governor, called Christie the "one man in New Jersey ... that stands in the way of marriage equality". Christie said in response: "If you want to change the core of a 2,000-year-old institution, the way to do that is to put it in front of the voters in the state of New Jersey and let them vote". [31] In September 2013, legislators in favor of the bill were organizing an attempt at the veto override, and several legislators who had not voted on the bill or had voted against committed to supporting it. [32] However, the veto was not overriden by the January 2014 deadline.

Garden State Equality v. Dow

On June 29, 2011, Lambda Legal filed suit in the Law Division of Superior Court in Mercer County on behalf of Garden State Equality, seven same-sex couples, and several of their children, arguing that New Jersey's civil unions did not provide the same rights as marriage as required by the court's decision in Lewis. [33] On September 27, 2013, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Mary Jacobson ruled that the state must allow same-sex couples to marry in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor . [34] [35] [36] Jacobson ruled that as of October 21, 2013, the state "shall permit" same-sex couples to marry. [34]

The Christie Administration appealed Jacobson's ruling and also requested a stay of its execution. The Supreme Court of New Jersey accepted the appeal on October 11 and scheduled oral arguments for January 6–7, 2014. [37] On October 18, 2013, the Supreme Court rendered a provisional, unanimous (7–0 vote) order denying the stay, thereby provisionally authorizing same-sex marriage in the state pending its decision on the state's appeal of Judge Jacobson's ruling. [38] In the Supreme Court's decision, Chief Justice Stuart Rabner wrote that "the state has advanced a number of arguments, but none of them overcome this reality: Same-sex couples who cannot marry are not treated equally under the law today". [39] The court held that it could "find no public interest in depriving a group of New Jersey residents of their constitutional right to equal protection while the appeals process unfolds." [40] Weddings were performed just after midnight on October 21, 2013, and Governor Christie dropped his administration's appeal of the lower court ruling that morning. [41] Among the first couples to marry were Joseph Panessidi and Orville Bell in Newark shortly after midnight on October 21. Their marriage was officiated by Mayor Cory Booker, who also officiated at six other same-sex marriages that day. [42]

Developments after legalization

In December 2021, the New Jersey Legislature passed legislation to codify same-sex marriage into state statues. [43] [44] [45] The bill was passed 35–4 in the Senate, [46] and 53–10 in the Assembly. [47] It was signed into law by Governor Phil Murphy on January 10, 2022. [48] New Jersey statutes were amended to read:

Laws concerning marriage and civil union shall be read with gender neutral intent. [R.S. 37:1-1(c)]

December 20, 2021 vote in the New Jersey Senate
Political affiliationVoted forVoted againstAbstained/Not present
  Democratic Party --
  Republican Party
Total 3541
December 20, 2021 vote in the New Jersey General Assembly
Political affiliationVoted forVoted againstAbstained/Not present
  Democratic Party -
  Republican Party
Total 531017

In July 2022, Garden State Equality, the Hudson Pride Connections Center and the Latino Action Network reported that the municipal websites of Estell Manor, Fairview, Hanover Township, Linden, New Hanover Township, and South Toms River contained language stating that only opposite-sex couples may apply for marriage licenses. Attorney General Matt Platkin announced in October 2022 that the Division on Civil Rights had launched an enforcement initiative to ensure that municipal governments not discriminate against same-sex couples in their webpages on vital records and marriage application instructions. Platkin said, "Marriage equality is the law here in New Jersey. But when municipalities use language indicating that individuals cannot obtain a marriage license based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, they violate that basic promise." The municipalities modified their webpages following the publication of the report. [49] [50] [51] [52]

Economic impact

A 2006 study from the University of California, Los Angeles estimated the potential economic impact of same-sex marriage on the New Jersey economy and concluded that the gain would be substantial. If New Jersey were to give same-sex couples the right to marry, that is marriage itself and not civil unions, the state would experience a surge in spending on weddings by same-sex couples who currently live in New Jersey, as well as an increase in wedding and tourist spending by same-sex couples from other states. The analysis outlined in detail in the report predicted that sales by New Jersey's wedding and tourism-related businesses would rise by $102.5 million in each of the first three years when marriage for same-sex couples is legal. [53] As a result, the state's gross receipt tax revenues would rise by $7.2 million per year, and 1,400 new jobs would be created in relevant industries. [54]

Demographics and marriage statistics

Data from the 2000 U.S. census showed that 16,604 same-sex couples were living in New Jersey. By 2005, this had increased to 20,677 couples, likely attributed to same-sex couples' growing willingness to disclose their partnerships on government surveys. Same-sex couples lived in all counties of the state and constituted 0.9% of coupled households and 0.5% of all households in the state. Most couples lived in Essex, Hudson, Bergen and Middlesex counties. Same-sex partners in New Jersey were on average younger than opposite-sex partners, and more likely to be employed. However, the average and median household incomes of same-sex couples were lower than different-sex couples, and same-sex couples were also far less likely to own a home than opposite-sex partners. 21% of same-sex couples in New Jersey were raising children under the age of 18, with an estimated 8,337 children living in households headed by same-sex couples in 2005. [55]

The 2020 U.S. census showed that there were 17,342 married same-sex couple households (8,197 male couples and 9,145 female couples) and 10,701 unmarried same-sex couple households in New Jersey. [56]

Public opinion

Public opinion for same-sex marriage in New Jersey
Poll sourceDates administeredSample sizeMargin of errorSupportOppositionDo not know / refused
Public Religion Research Institute March 9 – December 7, 2023 545 adults± 0.82%176%22%2%
Public Religion Research Institute March 11 – December 14, 2022  ? ?76%21%3%
Public Religion Research Institute March 8 – November 9, 2021  ? ?76%21%3%
Public Religion Research Institute January 7 – December 20, 2020 1,334 adults ?66%32%2%
Public Religion Research Institute April 5 – December 23, 2017 1,774 adults ?68%23%9%
Public Religion Research Institute May 18, 2016 – January 10, 2017 2,779 adults ?64%26%10%
Public Religion Research Institute April 29, 2015 – January 7, 2016 2,184 adults ?66%26%8%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics February 22–28, 2014729 registered voters± 3.8%64%28%6%
Quinnipiac University July 2–7, 20131,068 voters± 3.0%60%31%9%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics June 3–9, 2013763 registered voters± 3.6%59%30%11%
Quinnipiac University March 19–24, 20131,129 registered voters± 2.9%64%30%6%
Public Policy Polling November 26–28, 2012600 voters± 4.0%53%36%11%
Quinnipiac University February 21–27, 20121,396 registered voters± 2.6%57%37%6%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics February 9–11, 2012914 adults± 3.3%54%35%11%
Quinnipiac University January 10–16, 20121,460 registered voters± 2.6%52%42%6%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics October 6–9, 2011903 adults± 4.7%52%39%9%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics August 9–15, 2011615 registered voters± 3.9%52%32%16%
Public Policy Polling July 15–18, 2011480 voters± 4.5%47%42%11%
Quinnipiac University November 17–22, 20091,615 voters± 2.4%46%49%5%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics November 6–10, 2009903 adults± 3.3%50%42%8%
Quinnipiac University April 20092,222 registered voters± 2.1%49%43%8%
Zogby International August 7–11, 2008803 likely voters± 3.5%50%42%8%
Zogby International August 8–10, 2007803 voters± 3.5%48%45%7%
Rasmussen Reports July 2006500 likely voters ?42%54%4%
Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics June 14–19, 2006699 registered voters± 3.7%49%44%7%
Zogby International April 12–14, 2005804 voters± 3.5%55%40%5%
Zogby International July 15–19, 2003803 voters± 3.6%55%41%4%

Notes:

The questions asked in each opinion poll varied. For example, the November 2009 Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics poll asked voters if they would accept a decision by the New Jersey Legislature to legalize same-sex marriage, [57] while the 2006 Rasmussen Reports survey asked voters whether they personally define marriage as a union of a man and a woman or a union of two people. [58] A Zogby International poll conducted in April 2005 asked about same-sex couples married outside of the state: 57.5% felt the marriages should be recognized, while 37.2% thought the state should not recognize them, and 5.3% were not sure. [59] A 2006 Rutgers University/Eagleton Institute of Politics survey showed that New Jersey voters supported civil unions, with 66% in favor and 29% opposed. [60]

A July 2011 Public Policy Polling survey found that 81% of New Jersey voters supported the legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 41% supporting same-sex marriage and 40% supporting civil unions, while 17% opposed all legal recognition and 2% were not sure. [61]

New Jersey trends mirrors national trends, in that women, young people, Latinos, people with a college education, [60] and people who know gay men and lesbians are more supportive of same-sex marriage than men, the elderly, African Americans, Asian Americans, people without a college education, and those who do not know any gay men or lesbians. However, same-sex marriage was not seen as an "important issue" by the latter groups, and the Eagleton Institute of Politics found that they were not likely to be source of opposition to a same-sex marriage bill if it passed. [57] A 2012 Quinnipiac University poll found that a majority of Democrats and Independents supported same-sex marriage, while a majority of Republicans were opposed. [62]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil union</span> Legal union similar to marriage

A civil union is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, created primarily as a means to provide recognition in law for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage.

A domestic partnership is an intimate relationship between people, usually couples, who live together and share a common domestic life but who are not married. People in domestic partnerships receive legal benefits that guarantee right of survivorship, hospital visitation, and other rights.

A California domestic partnership is a legal relationship, analogous to marriage, created in 1999 to extend the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. It was extended to all opposite-sex couples as of January 1, 2016 and by January 1, 2020 to include new votes that updated SB-30 with more benefits and rights to California couples choosing domestic partnership before their wedding. California Governor Newsom signed into law on July 30, 2019.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage and legal recognition of same-sex couples worldwide. It begins with the history of same-sex unions during ancient times, which consisted of unions ranging from informal and temporary relationships to highly ritualized unions, and continues to modern-day state-recognized same-sex marriage. Events concerning same-sex marriages becoming legal in a country or in a country's state are listed in bold.

In the United States, domestic partnership is a city-, county-, state-, or employer-recognized status that may be available to same-sex couples and, sometimes, opposite-sex couples. Although similar to marriage, a domestic partnership does not confer any of the myriad rights and responsibilities of marriage afforded to married couples by the federal government. Domestic partnerships in the United States are determined by each state or local jurisdiction, so there is no nationwide consistency on the rights, responsibilities, and benefits accorded domestic partners.

New Jersey is one of the fifty U.S. states. The state is considered a stronghold of the Democratic Party and has supported the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since 1992. Democrats have also controlled both chambers of the state legislature since 2004. New Jersey currently has two Democratic United States senators. New Jersey's Class I Senate seat has been Democratic since 1959. New Jersey's Class II Senate seat has been Democratic since 1979. In addition, New Jersey's House congressional delegation has had a Democratic majority since 1965, except for a period between 1995-1999 and 2013-2017. As of July 1, 2020, there were more registered Democrats than unaffiliated voters for the first time in history, as there are more Democrats than Republicans as well.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in the U.S. state of Washington since December 6, 2012. On February 13, 2012, Governor Christine Gregoire signed legislation that established full marriage rights for same-sex couples in the state of Washington. Opponents mounted a challenge that required voters to approve the statute at a referendum, which they did on November 6. The law took effect on December 6, and the first marriages were performed on December 9. Within a couple of days, more than 600 marriage licenses were issued to same-sex couples in King County alone. Washington was the seventh U.S. state, and the eighth U.S. jurisdiction, to legalize same-sex marriages.

<i>Lewis v. Harris</i> New Jersey ruling re same-sex marriage

Lewis v. Harris, 188 N.J. 415; 908 A.2d 196, is a New Jersey Supreme Court case that held that the state's marriage laws violated the rights of same-sex couples to equal protection of the law under the state constitution. Four of the seven justices ruled that the legislature must, within six months, either amend marriage laws or create civil unions. In response, the legislature created the status of civil unions for same-sex couples.

In response to court action in a number of states, the United States federal government and a number of state legislatures passed or attempted to pass legislation either prohibiting or allowing same-sex marriage or other types of same-sex unions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Hawaii</span>

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Hawaii since December 2, 2013. The Hawaii State Legislature held a special session beginning on October 28, 2013, and passed the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act legalizing same-sex marriage. Governor Neil Abercrombie signed the legislation on November 13, and same-sex couples began marrying on December 2, making Hawaii the fifteenth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. Hawaii also allows both same-sex and opposite-sex couples to formalize their relationships legally in the form of civil unions and reciprocal beneficiary relationships. Civil unions provide the same rights, benefits, and obligations of marriage at the state level, while reciprocal beneficiary relationships provide a more limited set of rights. When Hawaii's civil union law took effect at the start of 2012, same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions were considered civil unions in Hawaii.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2008.

Same-sex unions in the United States are available in various forms in all states and territories, except American Samoa. All states have legal same-sex marriage, while others have the options of civil unions, domestic partnerships, or reciprocal beneficiary relationships. The federal government only recognizes marriage and no other legal union for same-sex couples.

Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 289 Conn. 135, 957 A.2d 407, is a 2008 decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court holding that allowing same-sex couples to form same-sex unions but not marriages violates the Connecticut Constitution. It was the third time that a ruling by the highest court of a U.S. state legalized same-sex marriage, following Massachusetts in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health (2003) and California in In re Marriage Cases (2008). The decision legalized same-sex marriage in Connecticut when it came into effect on November 12, 2008. There were no attempts made to amend the state constitution to overrule the decision, and gender-neutral marriage statutes were passed into law in 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Nevada</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Nevada enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex marriage has been legal since October 8, 2014, due to the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Sevcik v. Sandoval. Same-sex couples may also enter a domestic partnership status that provides many of the same rights and responsibilities as marriage. However, domestic partners lack the same rights to medical coverage as their married counterparts and their parental rights are not as well defined. Same-sex couples are also allowed to adopt, and state law prohibits unfair discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, among other categories, in employment, housing and public accommodations. In addition, conversion therapy on minors is outlawed in the state.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against enforcement of Nevada's same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada approved in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

The U.S. state of Colorado has provided limited recognition of same-sex unions in the form of designated beneficiary agreements since July 1, 2009, and as civil unions since May 1, 2013. Same-sex marriage was legalized on October 7, 2014.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Guam since June 9, 2015 in accordance with a ruling from the District Court of Guam on June 5 that the territory's prohibition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Guam was the first territory of the United States to recognize same-sex marriage. On August 27, 2015, the Guam Marriage Equality Act of 2015 passed by the Guam Legislature came into effect, officially incorporating the federal court ruling into statutory law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in New Jersey</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Jersey have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT individuals in New Jersey enjoy strong protections from discrimination, and have had the same marriage rights as heterosexual people since October 21, 2013.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

Garden State Equality v. Dow, 82 A. 3d 336 is a New Jersey Superior Court case holding that New Jersey's marriage laws violated the rights of same-sex couples to equal protection of the law under the New Jersey State Constitution. The ruling was issued on September 27, 2013. The Superior Court and the Superior Court, Appellate Division refused the State's request for a stay of the trial court's order, and the New Jersey Supreme Court refused to do so on a 7–0 vote. The ruling took effect on October 21, 2013. On the same day, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie dropped the State's plans to appeal, ending the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples in New Jersey.

References

  1. ↑ Zernike, Kate (October 21, 2013). "As Gays Wed in New Jersey, Christie Ends Court Fight". New York Times. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  2. ↑ "NJ Supreme Court won't delay gay marriage". The Record (Bergen County) . October 18, 2013. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  3. ↑ "Last barrier to N.J. same-sex weddings falls". The Boston Globe . October 22, 2013. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017.
  4. ↑ "NJ 'Marriage Equality' Now Law; Gov. Murphy Signs What Christie Vetoed". January 15, 2022.
  5. ↑ "Same-sex marriage is officially N.J. Law after Murphy signs bill". January 10, 2022.
  6. ↑ "New Jersey protects same-sex marriage from Supreme Court". January 14, 2022.
  7. 1 2 Rabner, Stuart (February 17, 2007). "Formal Opinion" (PDF). Attorney General. New Jersey. Retrieved July 24, 2007.
  8. 1 2 "Civil Unions for Same-sex Couples in New Jersey" (PDF). lambdalegal.org. Lambda Legal. 2007. Retrieved July 31, 2007.
  9. 1 2 3 "New Jersey Public Law 2006, c.103" (PDF). New Jersey Legislature. 2006. Retrieved July 31, 2007.
  10. ↑ "Defense of Marriage Act: Update to Prior Report, Letter to Senator Bill Frist" (PDF). General Accounting Office. United States. January 23, 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 16, 2007. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
  11. ↑ "The New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission". Division on Civil Rights. Trenton, NJ: State of New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety: Office of the Attorney General. January 20, 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
  12. ↑ "Support of the state of New Jersey" (PDF).
  13. 1 2 "Commission Report Cites Flaws in New Jersey Civil Union Law" (PDF).
  14. ↑ ""Corzine urges UPS to honor civil unions," Asbury Park Press, July 21, 2007. "The company's current union contract specifies that the benefits can only be extended to 'spouses,' but that New Jersey's civil union law doesn't specifically call civil union partners 'spouses.'"". App.com. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  15. ↑ Mulvihill, Geoff (July 30, 2007). "UPS changes policy, gives benefits to partners of gay N.J. workers". USA Today. Retrieved December 29, 2012.
  16. ↑ Office of the Attorney General: Formal Opinion No. 3-2007, February 16, 2007, accessed June 29, 2011
  17. ↑ "NJ companies stiff couples with civil unions". Shadowproof. May 23, 2007.
  18. ↑ "As UPS caves in, Fed Ex, DHL and scores of other companies continue to flaunt New Jersey's civil unions law," PoliticsNJ.com, July 30, 2007
  19. ↑ Crampton, Thomas (March 10, 2004). "Issuing Licenses, Quietly, To Couples in Asbury Park". New York Times. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
  20. ↑ Crampton, Thomas (March 11, 2013). "Asbury Park Halts Gay-Marriage Applications, Sending Issue to Courts". New York Times. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
  21. ↑ Livio and Heiniger (December 10, 2008). "Commission says New Jersey should allow gay marriage". The Star-Ledger . Retrieved December 10, 2008.
  22. 1 2 Panel says New Jersey should allow gay marriage, Reuters, 12/10/08
  23. ↑ "GOP victory in NJ ensures focus on gay marriage". NorthJersey.com. November 4, 2009. Retrieved February 17, 2012.
  24. ↑ "Chris Christie in tough spot after gay marriage ruling – Maggie Haberman". Politico.Com. September 27, 2013. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  25. ↑ "New Jersey Supreme Court Declines Gay Marriage Case". New York Times. July 26, 2010. Retrieved December 29, 2012.
  26. ↑ Kocieniewski, David (January 7, 2010). "New Jersey Senate Defeats Gay Marriage Bill". New York Times. Retrieved July 21, 2013.
  27. ↑ Kocieniewski, David (January 8, 2010). "New Jersey Senate Defeats Gay Marriage Bill". New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2010.
  28. ↑ Kate Zernike (February 17, 2012). "Christie Vetoes Gay Marriage Bill". New York Times. Retrieved February 17, 2012.
  29. ↑ Isherwood, Darryl R. (February 21, 2013). "Senate and Assembly to hold gay marriage veto override before end of term, Gusciora says". PolitickerNJ.com. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  30. ↑ Amick, Greg (September 16, 2013). "Amick: Gay marriage advocates lobby to override Christie's veto". Star-Ledger.
  31. ↑ Rizzo, Salvador (July 3, 2013). "N.J. Democrats press Republicans to 'vote their conscience' on gay marriage". NJ.com. Retrieved July 3, 2013.
  32. ↑ "Assemblyman who originally opposed same-sex marriage bill will support veto override". PolitickerNJ. October 2, 2013.
  33. ↑ Newark Star-Ledger: Matt Friedman, "Advocates file lawsuit hoping to legalize same-sex marriage in New Jersey," June 29, 2011, accessed June 29, 2011
  34. 1 2 "Judge says same-sex couples in N.J. can marry". Politickernj.com. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  35. ↑ "NJ JUDGE: STATE MUST ALLOW GAYS TO MARRY". Associated Press. Retrieved September 27, 2013.
  36. ↑ "Decision on Motion for Summary Judgement" (PDF). Garden State Equity v. Dow, N.J. Super. Ct. Law Div., Docket MER-L-1729-11 (Sept. 27, 2013).
  37. ↑ Lowe, Claire (October 15, 2013). "NJ Supreme Court to hear gay marriage appeal". Shore News Today.
  38. ↑ Salvador Rizzo (October 18, 2013). "Same-sex weddings can begin pending appeal, N.J. Supreme Court rules". New Jersey On-Line LLC. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
  39. ↑ Hanna, Jason; Wang, Kevin (October 20, 2013). "Same-sex marriages can start Monday in New Jersey". CNN. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  40. ↑ Ax, Joseph (October 18, 2013). "New Jersey top court rules gay marriages can begin on Monday". Reuters. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  41. ↑ Zernike, Kate; Santora, Marc (October 21, 2013). "As Gays Wed in New Jersey, Christie Ends Court Fight". New York Times. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
  42. ↑ Gabbatt, Adam (October 21, 2013). "First gay marriages in New Jersey take place". The Guardian.
  43. ↑ "New Jersey legislature passes marriage equality law to protect LGBTQ couples". Out In Jersey. December 24, 2021.
  44. ↑ "New Jersey S3416 | 2020-2021 | Regular Session".
  45. ↑ "Marriage Equality Now Enshrined In State Law". Insider NJ. January 10, 2021.
  46. ↑ "New Jersey S3416 | 2020-2021 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved September 15, 2022.
  47. ↑ "New Jersey S3416 | 2020-2021 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved September 15, 2022.
  48. ↑ "Governor Murphy Signs Legislation to Enshrine Marriage Equality into State Law" (Press release). Trenton, New Jersey: Government of New Jersey. January 10, 2022.
  49. ↑ Symons, Michael (October 6, 2022). "NJ accuses 5 towns of violating law regarding same-sex marriage".
  50. ↑ Nieto-Munoz, Sophie (July 5, 2022). "Six N.J. municipal websites tell marriage license applicants they must be of opposite sex". New Jersey Monitor.
  51. ↑ "NJ Attorney General Announces Resolutions with Five Municipalities, Including Hanover, Who Allegedly Discriminated Against LGBTQIA+ Individuals Seeking Marriage Licenses". TAPIntoMorristown. October 29, 2023.
  52. ↑ Gibbons, Sammy (October 20, 2023). "Prodded by state, 5 NJ towns update sites with LGBTQ-inclusive marriage license forms". NorthJersey.com.
  53. ↑ Badgett, M. V. Lee (December 2006). "Economic Benefits from Same-Sex Weddings in New Jersey". Repositories.cdlib.org. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  54. ↑ Sears, Brad; Ramos, Christopher; Badgett, M.V. Lee (December 2009). "The Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples on the New Jersey Budget" (PDF). Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy . Retrieved October 24, 2015.
  55. ↑ "Census Snapshot" (PDF). Williams Institute. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
  56. ↑ "PCT1405 Couple Households, By Type". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  57. 1 2 Redlawsk, David (November 18, 2009). "Rutgers–Eagleton Poll Finds New Jerseyans Support Legalizing Gay Marriage" (PDF). Eagleton Institute of Politics . Retrieved December 5, 2009.
  58. ↑ "Same-Sex Marriage: Garden State's Highest Court Approves Rights for Gay Couples". Rasmussenreports.com. October 26, 2006. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  59. ↑ "Many Back Same-Sex Marriage In New Jersey". Archived from the original on March 12, 2007.
  60. 1 2 "NEW JERSEY VOTERS DIVIDED OVER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE" (PDF). Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  61. ↑ "July 2011 Public Policy Polling survey" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 22, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  62. ↑ "New Jersey Same-Sex Marriage Support At New High, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Voters Back Holding Referendum More Than 2–1". Quinnipiac.edu. March 1, 2012. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.