Same-sex marriage in North Carolina

Last updated

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in North Carolina since October 10, 2014, when a U.S. District Court judge ruled in General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper that the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples was unconstitutional. Governor Pat McCrory and Attorney General Roy Cooper had acknowledged that a recent ruling in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to hear an appeal in that case established the unconstitutionality of North Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage. State legislators sought without success to intervene in lawsuits to defend the state's ban on same-sex marriage. North Carolina was the 28th U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Contents

North Carolina had previously denied marriage rights to same-sex couples by statute since 1996. A state constitutional amendment that was approved in 2012 reinforced that by defining marriage between a man and a woman as the only valid "domestic legal union" in the state and denying recognition to any similar legal status, such as civil unions. The defunct amendment remains in the North Carolina Constitution. It can only be repealed with another amendment that must be passed by both chambers of the North Carolina General Assembly with a three-fifths vote and receive approval by a majority of voters in a referendum. [1] On July 12, 2017, same-sex marriage was codified in state statutes regarding statutory construction.

Statutes

Prenuptial agreements for same-sex couples are codified in North Carolina state statutes and state judicial legal precedent. [2] [3] Statutes also cover terminations in post-separation support or alimony when a dependent same-sex spouse engages in cohabitation. [4] On May 11, 1995, the North Carolina House of Representatives passed House Bill 270, a bill that added to statutes pertaining to alimony that "if a dependent spouse that receives postseparation support or alimony from a supporting spouse under a judgment or order of a North Carolina court remarries or engages in cohabitation, the postseparation support or alimony shall terminate." Cohabitation was defined as "the act of two adults dwelling together continuously and habitually in a private heterosexual relationship, even if this relationship is not solemnized by marriage, or a private homosexual relationship." The Senate passed the legislation on June 14, 1995. The bill was ratified by Governor Jim Hunt on June 21, and came into force on October 1, 1995. [5]

On June 18, 1996, the State Senate passed a bill banning same-sex marriage and the recognition of same-sex marriages performed out of state by a vote of 41–4. That same day, the House of Representatives voted 98–10 in favor of the bill. It was ratified by Governor Hunt, and went into effect on June 20, 1996. [6] [7] [8] [9]

Constitution

Between 2004 and 2011, bills were introduced every year in the North Carolina General Assembly to implement a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage in the North Carolina Constitution. Until 2011, all those bills died in committee without a vote. After the 2010 elections, Republicans gained control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate for the first time since 1870. On September 12, 2011, Senate Bill 514, a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment to prohibit same-sex marriage and any "domestic legal union", passed the House by a vote of 75–42. [10] [11] [12] The bill passed the three-fifths threshold (72 votes) in the House with the support of 10 Democrats. Authors of the amendment decided to place it on the May 2012 primary ballot rather than the November 2012 general election ballot. According to reporter Kim Severson, the change from the November to the May ballot was made due to the fact that Republican presidential primaries would be held that same date, ensuring a high voter turnout for Republicans, a group of voters traditionally opposed to same-sex marriage. On September 13, the Senate voted 30–16 in favor of the measure. [11] On May 8, 2012, North Carolina voters approved Amendment 1 by a vote of 61.04% to 38.96%. [13]

The amendment added to Section XIV of the Constitution of North Carolina:

Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts.

North Carolina was the 30th U.S. state, and the last in the Southeastern United States, to adopt a constitutional amendment defining marriage so as to exclude same-sex couples. [14] [15] The amendment took effect on May 23, 2012. [16] On October 10, 2014, it was ruled unconstitutional in General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper . However, the defunct unconstitutional constitutional amendment remains on the books. In order for it to be repealed, another amendment would require approval by a three-fifths vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and majority approval from voters in a referendum.

Lawsuits

Mullinax v. Covington

On March 22, 2004, Richard Mullinax and Perry Pike, a same-sex couple from Durham, filed suit against county officials, arguing that the county must issue them a marriage license, even though state law forbade same-sex marriage. County officials filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The case was heard and dismissed without prejudice on May 10, 2004, by a district court judge. [17]

Fisher-Borne v. Smith and Gerber v. Cooper

On June 13, 2012, six same-sex couples filed a federal lawsuit, Fisher-Borne v. Smith, that initially sought the right to obtain stepchild adoptions. In July 2013, following the June U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor , they amended their suit to challenge the constitutionality of the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples. [18] They were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and private attorneys. Briefing was completed on August 13, 2014. [19] Three same-sex couples filed Gerber v. Cooper in federal court in April 2014 seeking North Carolina's recognition of their marriages, which were established in other jurisdictions. They were represented by the ACLU and private attorneys. Briefing was completed on August 13, 2014. [19] Proceedings in both cases were stayed pending the outcome of a Virginia case, Bostic v. Schaefer . The U.S. Supreme Court declined the appeal in that case on October 6, 2014, leaving the Fourth Circuit's decision, which found Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, as binding precedent on courts in North Carolina. [20] On July 28, after the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in Bostic, the North Carolina Attorney General, Roy Cooper, had announced that he would no longer defend the state's ban on same-sex marriage. He said that because all judges in North Carolina were bound by the Fourth Circuit's precedent, "today we know our law will almost surely be overturned as well. Simply put, it's time to stop making arguments we will lose and instead move forward knowing the ultimate resolution will likely come from the United States Supreme Court." [21]

On October 8, 2014, Judge William Osteen of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina lifted those stays and invited plaintiffs' attorneys to present the court with a motion to rule North Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. [22] The plaintiffs in both cases filed a joint motion asking the court to issue such an order. They modeled their suggested language on the order issued in Bostic. [23] On October 9, two leaders of the North Carolina General Assembly, Thom Tillis, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Phil Berger, the President pro tempore of the Senate, asked to be allowed to intervene to defend the state's ban. [24] Their filing said: "This intervention is about ensuring that the choice made by North Carolina voters receives its day in Court." They contended that "because Bostic was based in part on outcome-determinative concessions made by the Virginia Attorney General that have not been made in this litigation, Bostic does not control." If the district court determined that Bostic controlled the decision in these cases, they proposed to pursue appeals of that judgment to the Fourth Circuit, the Fourth Circuit en banc , and the U.S. Supreme Court. [25] On October 14, Judge Osteen allowed them to intervene solely to preserve their right to appeal. [26] He ruled for the plaintiffs the same day. He found Bostic controlling since North Carolina's and Virginia's bans were virtually identical, held North Carolina's ban unconstitutional, and enjoined the state from enforcing its ban on same-sex marriage. [27]

On December 16, the Fourth Circuit consolidated these cases and put proceedings on hold pending action by the U.S. Supreme Court on certiorari petitions in Obergefell v. Hodges and related cases. On January 14, 2015, Berger and Tillis petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case without waiting for review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. [28] The Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2015, that state same-sex marriage bans violate the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in the United States. Lieutenant Governor Dan Forest condemned the court ruling, saying, "The power grab by a majority of the Supreme Court is a full-on assault on the founding principles of democratic process, federalism, separation of powers, the voice of the people and judicial restraint." Michael Francis Burbidge, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Raleigh, said, "The true definition of marriage cannot be redefined by courts. It remains the permanent union of one man and one woman, oriented to the procreation and raising of children. The Catholic Church, along with many other Christian and religious traditions, will continue our work with regard to this true definition of marriage and to strengthen the moral basis for all such relationships." The ACLU issued the following statement, "The Supreme Court today welcomed same-sex couples fully into the American family. Gay and lesbian couples and our families may be at peace knowing that our simple request to be treated like everyone else – that is, to be able to participate in the dignity of marriage – has finally been granted. Today's historic victory comes on the backs of same-sex couples and advocates who have worked for decades to dismantle harmful stereotypes and unjust laws in the quest for equal treatment." State Representative Larry Hall called it a "victory for equality", and the Mayor of Chapel Hill, Mark Kleinschmidt, called it "a great day for all Americans and for the promise of our democracy". David Price, representing North Carolina's 4th congressional district, said, "I join many of my constituents, some of whom have been waiting for this moment for a long time, in celebrating today's Supreme Court decision, which continues the remarkable progress we have made as a country toward equal rights for all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. I am reminded this morning of the landmark cases of the Civil Rights era, when justice finally won out over long-standing prejudice." [29]

General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper

On April 28, 2014, the United Church of Christ, joined by a coalition of Baptists, Lutherans, and Unitarian Universalists, filed a lawsuit, [30] arguing that North Carolina's statute that made it a crime to preside at the solemnization of the marriage of a couple that lacked a valid state marriage license unconstitutionally restricted religious freedom. [31] [32] On June 3, 2014, additional national religious denominations and clergy were added as plaintiffs, including the Alliance of Baptists, the Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists, and the Central Conference of American Rabbis in addition to Episcopal, Jewish and Baptist clergy. [33] Dr. Reverend Nancy Petty of the Pullen Memorial Baptist Church, a plaintiff in the case, said, "By preventing our same-sex congregants from forming their own families, the North Carolina ban on same-sex marriage burdens my ability and the ability of my congregation to form a faith community of our choosing consistent with the principles of our faith." Reverend Nancy Allison, a pastor of the Holy Covenant United Church of Christ and another plaintiff, said, "North Carolina judges some of its citizens as unfit for the blessings of God. We reject that notion. […] The sacraments of baptism and communion are open to all. So should all God's children be able to receive marriage." A spokesperson for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte condemned the lawsuit, saying "This lawsuit does not change the fact that God created men and women differently. The fruits of that difference are marriage and the continuance of the human race through children." Tami Fitzgerald, executive director of the North Carolina Values Coalition, a group that opposes same-sex marriage, said, "[I]t's both ironic and sad that an entire religious denomination and its clergy who purport holding to Christian teachings on marriage would look to the courts to justify their errant beliefs. These individuals are simply revisionists that distort the teaching of Scripture to justify sexual revolution, not marital sanctity." Paul Gallant, a commentator for The News & Observer , issued the following statement, "I find it interesting that right-wing Christians pushed this into law because [same-sex marriage is] ... against their religious beliefs and now left-wing Christians say the law violates their Christian beliefs. How about we leave marriage up to individuals and leave the government out of it? Less government! You would think right wingers would be all for this." [34]

On October 7, the plaintiffs asked for an immediate injunction against the state, citing the Fourth Circuit's ruling in Bostic. [35] On October 10, Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina denied a request by leaders of the General Assembly to be allowed to intervene to defend the state's ban and ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. [36] [37] He wrote: [38]

"The issue before this court is neither a political issue nor a moral issue. It is legal issue, and it is clear as a matter of what is now settled law in the Fourth Circuit that North Carolina laws prohibiting same-sex marriage, refusing to recognize same-sex marriages originating elsewhere, and/or threatening to penalize those who would solemnize such marriages, are unconstitutional."

The decision legalized same-sex marriage in North Carolina with immediate effect. The first same-sex couple to marry in the state were Chad Biggs and Chris Creech in Raleigh on Friday, October 10. [39] Chris Sgro, executive director of Equality North Carolina, said "Today's ruling allowing loving, same-sex couples to marry across North Carolina is a historic moment for our state. With it, we celebrate with so many North Carolinians who have worked tirelessly over decades to change hearts, minds, and unequal laws in the state we call home. Love won and the barriers to it are done." [40] Governor Pat McCrory said "[his] administration is moving forward with the execution of the court's ruling." In Raleigh, Asheville and Greensboro, county offices stayed open late to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Charlotte said it would open its office on Monday, October 13.

M.E. v. T.J.

In January 2021, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled in M.E. v. T.J. that the statute preventing judges from granting domestic violence protections to people in same-sex relationships was unconstitutional. [41] The ruling was upheld by the North Carolina Supreme Court on March 11, 2022. North Carolina was the last remaining state in the country to deny certain domestic violence protections to same-sex partners. [42]

Developments after legalization

Codification in state statutes

In order to abide by the legal precedent in General Synod of the United Church of Christ, HB 229, a bill to make technical corrections to state statutes as recommended by the General Statutes Commission was introduced to the General Assembly. The bill would amend the statute governing statutory construction to define the terms "husband and wife", "wife and husband", "man and wife", "woman and husband", "husband or wife", "wife or husband", "man or wife", "woman or husband", or "other terms suggesting two individuals who are then lawfully married to each other" as including "any two individuals who are then lawfully married to each other". The Senate passed the bill by a vote of 45 to 2 on June 26, 2017. The bill passed the House of Representatives by 116 votes to 1 the following day. It was signed into law by Governor McCrory on July 12, 2017, and went into effect that same day. [43]

On May 7, 2019, SB 595, a bill to codify property laws such as tenancy by the entirety, on the recommendations of the North Carolina Bar Association, was introduced to the General Assembly. The bill would define "spouses" as "two individuals then legally married to each other" and replace the term "husband and wife" with "spouses". The bill passed the House on June 16, 2020, and the Senate on June 18 by 47 votes to 0. It was signed into law by Governor Roy Cooper on June 30, 2020, and went into effect that same day. [44]

On May 5, 2023, SB 112, a bill to make technical corrections to the statutes concerning alimony and distribution of marital and divisible property in divorce proceedings, replacing the term "husband or wife" with "one or both spouses", passed the Senate by a vote of 50–0. [45]

Religious exemption for magistrates

When the decision in General Synod took effect, state officials announced that judges were required to preside at marriage ceremonies for same-sex couples just as they would at those for different-sex couples and that a judge could not claim an exemption on religious grounds. By early November, six judges had resigned citing religious objections. A group of Republican legislators led by Senate President Phil Berger announced plans to sponsor legislation creating a religious exemption for state magistrates who object to participating at same-sex weddings on religious grounds. Such legislation passed the General Assembly in May 2015, though was vetoed by Governor McCrory. On June 3, 2015, the Senate successfully overrode McCrory's veto by a vote of 32–16, reaching the three-fifths majority needed for overriding a veto in the Senate. [46] An override vote was held in the House of Representatives on June 11, 2015, achieving the three-fifths majority required by a margin of 69–41. As a result, the measure became law in North Carolina, which is just the second state after Utah to allow for this sort of religious exemption for state magistrates. [47]

A lawsuit arguing that the exemption was unconstitutional was filed in federal court on December 9, 2015. [48] On June 28, 2017, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit, composed of J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Barbara Milano Keenan and Stephanie Thacker, dismissed the lawsuit because the couples who brought the suit lacked standing as none of them had been turned down by a state magistrate. At the time the lawsuit was filed, roughly 5 percent of magistrates were refusing to marry same-sex couples for religious reasons. This included every magistrate in McDowell County. [49]

Attempt to pass unconstitutional legislation

On April 11, 2017, three Republicans legislators introduced the Uphold Historical Marriage Act to the General Assembly. [lower-alpha 1] The bill sought to reenact the state's same-sex marriage ban, thus being in violation of Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which held that same-sex couples have a nationwide fundamental right to marry. [50] The bill claimed the Supreme Court "overstepped its constitutional bounds". It also quoted the Bible, saying "the ruling exceeds the authority of the court relative to the decree of Almighty God that a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh". [51] [52] Governor Cooper subsequently announced his opposition to the bill, tweeting "We need more LGBT protections, not fewer." The following day, House Speaker Tim Moore denied the bill a hearing, effectively killing it. Moore said that "there are strong constitutional concerns with this legislation given that the U.S. Supreme Court has firmly ruled on the issue." [53]

Native American nations

Same-sex marriage is not legal on the reservation of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. Tribal law specifies that the marriage "between a man and a woman" is recognized if a license is obtained from a register of deeds in their county of residence or the Cherokee Court; however, tribal law also states that all marriages, which have been solemnized according to the laws of North Carolina or any other state or Native American nation, will be given full faith and credit by the tribe. [54] On December 11, 2014, a resolution reaffirming the wording was passed, ensuring that marriage ceremonies will not be performed within tribal jurisdiction. Licenses issued to same-sex couples elsewhere continue to be recognized, however. [55] In September 2021, the Tribal Council voted 8–3 to reject a resolution which would have legalized same-sex marriage on the reservation. The resolution was introduced by Tamara Thompson, a member of the LGBT community. Chelsea Taylor Saunooke, who supported the resolution, said, "She's [her girlfriend] my fiancé. I hope we can get married here. If not. Maybe I can wait for the day to come. But thank you, to those who aren't in support for violating your co-council member's rights." [56]

While there are no records of same-sex marriages as understood from a Western perspective being performed in Native American cultures, there is evidence for identities and behaviours that may be placed on the LGBT spectrum. Many of these cultures recognised two-spirit individuals who were born male but wore women's clothing and performed everyday household work and artistic handiwork which were regarded as belonging to the feminine sphere. This two-spirit status allowed for marriages between two biological males or two biological females to be performed in some of these tribes. [57] It is likely that Cherokee society had a designation like two-spirit, but a lot of traditional knowledge was lost in the aftermath of colonization and the Trail of Tears for those Cherokee forcibly removed to the Indian Territory. Among the Cherokee, ᎠᏎᎽ ᎤᏓᏅᏙ (asegi udando, pronounced [àse̋ːgĩ́ùdàntṍ] ) [58] refers to people who either fall outside of men's and women's roles or who occupy both men's and women's roles. [59] [57]

Demographics and marriage statistics

Data from the 2000 U.S. census showed that 16,198 same-sex couples were living in North Carolina. By 2005, this had increased to 19,648 couples, likely attributed to same-sex couples' growing willingness to disclose their partnerships on government surveys. Same-sex couples lived in all counties of the state and constituted 0.9% of coupled households and 0.5% of all households in the state. Most couples lived in Mecklenburg, Wake and Guilford counties, but the counties with the highest percentage of same-sex couples were Durham (0.85% of all county households) and Buncombe (0.79%). Same-sex partners in North Carolina were on average younger than opposite-sex partners, and more likely to be employed. However, the average and median household incomes of same-sex couples were lower than different-sex couples, and same-sex couples were also far less likely to own a home than opposite-sex partners. 22% of same-sex couples in North Carolina were raising children under the age of 18, with an estimated 7,437 children living in households headed by same-sex couples in 2005. [60]

The 2020 U.S. census showed that there were 19,169 married same-sex couple households (7,685 male couples and 11,484 female couples) and 15,688 unmarried same-sex couple households in North Carolina. [61]

Domestic partnerships

Map of North Carolina counties and cities offering domestic partnerships .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} City offers domestic partnerships County offers domestic partnerships County or city does not offer domestic partnerships North Carolina counties and cities with domestic partnerships.svg
Map of North Carolina counties and cities offering domestic partnerships
  City offers domestic partnerships
  County offers domestic partnerships
  County or city does not offer domestic partnerships

Some cities and counties in North Carolina recognize domestic partnerships. Registered domestic partners are legally recognized only by the jurisdiction in which they registered. The partnerships allow the extension of health care benefits to employees and their domestic partners. Some cities in the state recognize both same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partnerships. According to 2010 census data, there were 228,000 North Carolina couples in domestic partnerships and 12 percent of those were same-sex couples. [10] [62] In 2008, the General Assembly added a provision to state law, affording hospital visitation rights to same-sex couples though a designated visitor statute. [63]

The first town to establish domestic partnerships was Carrboro in 1994, which permits such partnerships between any two persons who are residents of the town of Carrboro or at least one of whom is an employee of the town of Carrboro. [64] Chapel Hill followed suit in 1995, allowing for the registration of domestic partnerships between any two adults who live together in a long-term relationship of indefinite duration, [65] with an exclusive mutual commitment in which the partners share the necessities of life and are financially interdependent, and also are not married to anyone else, do not have another domestic partner and not related by blood more closely than would bar their marriage in the state. [66]

Durham became the first city to allow domestic partnerships in 2003. [67] Durham County did the same later that same year, becoming the first county in the state to do so. [68] In December of that same year, commissioners in Orange County approved a measure to extend benefits to the domestic partners of county employees. [69] Benefits available include dependent health, dental, life, and retiree insurance, funeral leave, sick leave, shared leave and family leave of absence. [69] The estimated cost for one percent of Orange County (or seven employees) to participate in domestic partnerships was $17,000 for the county's contribution. [70] Greensboro began offering domestic partnerships in 2007. [71] The City Council was initially concerned that by offering domestic partner benefits they would be in violation of North Carolina's crime against nature law as well as federal equal protection laws if they offered those benefits to same-sex couples and not unmarried heterosexual couples. [72]

Mecklenburg County passed a policy allowing domestic partner benefits for county employees and their partners in December 2009. [73] The approved plan defines "domestic partners" as two people of the same sex in a "spousal like" and "exclusive, mutually committed" relationship in which both "share the necessities of life and are financially interdependent". [74] On February 22, 2011, Asheville authorized the creation of a domestic partnership registry to recognize same-sex relationships, becoming the first city in Western North Carolina to do so. The registry became available on May 2, 2011. [75] Charlotte created its own domestic partnership registry, separate from Mecklenburg County, in 2013. [76] In March 2013, Buncombe County became the fourth North Carolina county to allow domestic partnerships. [77]

Public opinion

Public opinion for same-sex marriage in North Carolina
Poll sourceDates administeredSample sizeMargin of errorSupportOppositionDo not know / refused
Public Religion Research Institute March 9 – December 7, 2023 720 adults± 0.82%165%34%1%
Public Religion Research Institute March 11 – December 14, 2022  ? ?65%34%1%
Public Religion Research Institute March 8 – November 9, 2021  ? ?66%32%2%
Public Religion Research Institute January 7 – December 20, 2020 1,730 adults ?62%32%6%
Public Religion Research Institute April 5 – December 23, 2017 2,499 adults ?49%41%10%
Public Religion Research Institute May 18, 2016 – January 10, 2017 3,544 adults ?49%40%11%
Public Religion Research Institute April 29, 2015 – January 7, 2016 2,855 adults ?46%47%7%
Public Religion Research Institute April 2, 2014 – January 4, 2015 1,864 adults ?44%49%7%
Elon University October 21–25, 20141,084 adults± 3.0%43%46%11%
996 registered voters± 3.1%42%47%11%
687 likely voters± 3.7%39%50%11%
High Point University October 21–25, 2014802 voters± 3.5%36%58%6%
New York Times/CBS News/YouGov September 20 – October 1, 20142,002 likely voters± 2.5%42%46%12%
American Insights September 5–10, 2014600 registered voters± 4.0%46%46%8%
459 likely voters± 4.6%44%48%8%
Elon University September 5–9, 20141,078 adults± 3.0%45%42%13%
983 registered voters± 3.1%45%42%13%
629 likely voters± 3.9%45%43%12%
Elon University April 25–28, 2014672 registered voters± 3.8%41%46%13%
New York Times/Kaiser Family Foundation April 8–15, 2014900 registered voters ?44%49%7%
Public Policy Polling April 3–6, 2014740 registered voters± 3.6%40%53%7%
Elon University February 23–26, 2014925 registered voters± 3.2%40%51%9%
Public Religion Research Institute November 12 – December 18, 2013165 adults± 8.9%47%48%5%
Elon University September 13–16, 2013701 registered voters± 3.7%43%46%11%
Elon University April 5–9, 2013770 residents± 3.5%43%46%11%
Public Policy Polling May 10–13, 2012666 voters± 3.8%34%58%8%
Public Policy Polling May 5–6, 20121,026 likely voters± 3.1%34%57%9%
Public Policy Polling January 5–8, 2012780 registered voters± 3.5%32%57%11%
Public Policy Polling December 1–4, 2011865 voters± 3.3%30%57%13%
Public Policy Polling October 27–31, 2011615 registered voters± 4.0%35%59%6%
Public Policy Polling September 30 – October 3, 2011671 likely primary voters± 4.3%30%63%7%
Public Policy Polling September 1–4, 2011520 voters± 4.3%31%61%8%

Notes:

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The three sponsors were Larry Pittman, Michael Speciale, and Carl Ford.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions</span>

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions of several different types passed, banning legal recognition of same-sex unions in U.S. state constitutions, referred to by proponents as "defense of marriage amendments" or "marriage protection amendments." These state amendments are different from the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban same-sex marriage in every U.S. state, and Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more commonly known as DOMA, which allowed the states not to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. The amendments define marriage as a union between one man and one woman and prevent civil unions or same-sex marriages from being legalized, though some of the amendments bar only the latter. The Obergefell decision in June 2015 invalidated these state constitutional amendments insofar as they prevented same-sex couples from marrying, even though the actual text of these amendments remain written into the state constitutions.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage and legal recognition of same-sex couples worldwide. It begins with the history of same-sex unions during ancient times, which consisted of unions ranging from informal and temporary relationships to highly ritualized unions, and continues to modern-day state-recognized same-sex marriage. Events concerning same-sex marriages becoming legal in a country or in a country's state are listed in bold.

In response to court action in a number of states, the United States federal government and a number of state legislatures passed or attempted to pass legislation either prohibiting or allowing same-sex marriage or other types of same-sex unions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Virginia Question 1</span> Amendment to the Constitution of Virginia

2006 Virginia Question 1, the Marshall-Newman Amendment is an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia that defines marriage as solely between one man and one woman and bans recognition of any legal status "approximat[ing] the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage". The amendment was ratified by 57% of the voters on November 7, 2006. It became part of the state Constitution as Section 15-A of Article 1. In 2014, the amendment was ruled unconstitutional in Bostic v. Schaefer.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, upon the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On October 6, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of an appellate court ruling in Wolf v. Walker that had found Wisconsin's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. The appellate court issued its order prohibiting enforcement of the state's ban on same-sex marriage the next day and Wisconsin counties began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately. Wisconsin had previously recognized domestic partnerships, which afforded limited legal rights to same-sex couples, from August 2009 until they were discontinued in April 2018.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2008.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Wyoming since October 21, 2014. The U.S. state of Wyoming had previously prohibited state recognition of same-sex marriages by statute since 1977 and had enacted a more explicit ban in 2003. An attempt to enact legislation recognizing domestic partnerships as an alternative to marriage for same-sex couples failed in 2013. On October 17, 2014, a federal district court found the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Its ruling took effect on October 21 when state officials notified the court that they would not appeal the decision.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Utah since October 6, 2014. On December 20, 2013, the state began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples as a result of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah's ruling in the case of Kitchen v. Herbert, which found that barring same-sex couples from marrying violates the U.S. Constitution. The issuance of those licenses was halted during the period of January 6, 2014 until October 6, 2014, following the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On that day, following the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to hear an appeal in a case that found Utah's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the state to recognize same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against enforcement of Nevada's same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada approved in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Michigan since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. The U.S. state of Michigan had previously banned the recognition of same-sex unions in any form after a popular vote added an amendment to the Constitution of Michigan in 2004. A statute enacted in 1996 also banned both the licensing of same-sex marriages and the recognition of same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in South Carolina since a federal court order took effect on November 20, 2014. Another court ruling on November 18 had ordered the state to recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. Following the 2014 ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bostic v. Schaefer, which found Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional and set precedent on every state in the circuit, one judge accepted marriage license applications from same-sex couples until the South Carolina Supreme Court, in response to a request by the Attorney General, ordered him to stop. A federal district court ruled South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on November 12, with implementation of that decision stayed until noon on November 20. The first same-sex wedding ceremony was held on November 19.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in West Virginia since October 9, 2014. On July 28, 2014, a ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bostic v. Schaefer found Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Bostic, allowing the ruling to take effect. As a result, on October 9, 2014, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin announced he was ordering state agencies to act in compliance with the controlling precedent in the Virginia case. Even though West Virginia's ban had not been explicitly declared unconstitutional, the Fourth Circuit precedent made it certain the state's statutory ban would be overturned. The state started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples that same day. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia officially ruled the state's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional on November 7, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in North Carolina</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of North Carolina may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents, or LGBT residents of other states with more liberal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Virginia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Virginia enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT rights in the state are a relatively recent occurrence; with most improvements in LGBT rights occurring in the 2000s and 2010s. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Bostic v. Rainey. Effective July 1, 2020, there is a state-wide law protecting LGBT persons from discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and credit. The state's hate crime laws also now explicitly include both sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Carolina Amendment 1</span>

North Carolina Amendment 1 is a partially overturned legislatively referred constitutional amendment in North Carolina that amended the Constitution of North Carolina to add ARTICLE XIV, Section 6, which prohibit the state from recognizing or performing same-sex marriages, civil unions or civil union equivalents by defining male–female marriage as "the only domestic legal union" considered valid or recognized in the state. It did not prohibit domestic partnerships in the state and also constitutionally protected same-sex and opposite-sex prenuptial agreements, which is the only part that is still in effect today. On May 8, 2012, North Carolina voters approved the amendment, 61% to 39%, with a voter turnout of 35%. On May 23, 2012, the amendment took effect.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

The U.S. state of Texas issues marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognizes those marriages when performed out-of-state. On June 26, 2015, the United States legalized same-sex marriage nationwide due to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Article 1, Section 32, of the Texas Constitution provided that "Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman," and "This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage." This amendment and all related statutes have been ruled unconstitutional and unenforceable. Some cities and counties in the state recognize both same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partnerships.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Tennessee since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Governor Bill Haslam quickly announced that the state would abide by the court's decision, and same-sex couples began to marry in Tennessee. Previously, Tennessee had banned same-sex marriage both by statute and its State Constitution.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, following the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear an appeal of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in Bostic v. Schaefer. Same-sex marriages subsequently began at 1:00 p.m. on October 6 after the Fourth Circuit issued its mandate, and since then Virginia has performed legal marriages of same-sex couples and recognized out-of-state same-sex marriages. Previously, the state had passed a statute prohibiting same-sex marriage in 1975, and further restrictions were added in 1997 and 2004, which made "void and unenforceable" any arrangements between same-sex couples bestowing the "privileges or obligations of marriage". Voters approved an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia reinforcing the existing laws in 2006. On January 14, 2014, a U.S. district court judge ruled in Bostic that Virginia's statutory and constitutional ban on the state recognition of same-sex marriages were unconstitutional, a decision upheld by the Fourth Circuit on July 28, 2014.

In the United States, the history of same-sex marriage dates from the early 1940s, when the first lawsuits seeking legal recognition of same-sex relationships brought the question of civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples to public attention though they proved unsuccessful. However marriage wasn't a request for the LGBTQ movement until the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington (1987). The subject became increasingly prominent in U.S. politics following the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Miike that suggested the possibility that the state's prohibition might be unconstitutional. That decision was met by actions at both the federal and state level to restrict marriage to male-female couples, notably the enactment at the federal level of the Defense of Marriage Act.

References

  1. ↑ Leitsinger, Miranda (May 8, 2012). "Backers of North Carolina gay marriage ban: State no longer 'vulnerable'". NBC News.
  2. ↑ Chapter 52B. Uniform Premarital Agreement Act.
  3. ↑ Public Employment Law Bulletin
  4. ↑ § 50-16.9. Modification of order.
  5. ↑ House Bill 270
  6. ↑ "Senate Bill 1487 (1995-1996 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly". www.ncleg.gov.
  7. ↑ "SENATE BILL 1487" (PDF).
  8. ↑ "The Dispatch". news.google.com.
  9. ↑ "Chapter 51- Article 1". Archived from the original on May 12, 2012.
  10. 1 2 Zucchino, David (May 8, 2012). "North Carolina Passes Ban on Gay Marriage". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  11. 1 2 "Senate Bill 514 "Defense of Marriage" (Amendment 1)". Archived from the original on November 3, 2011. Retrieved April 23, 2012. Click on "Show All Votes"
  12. ↑ "Marriage Amendment Would Affect Many People, Panel Says". Winston-Salem Journal . Archived from the original on April 20, 2012. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  13. ↑ Weiner, Rachel (May 8, 2012). "North Carolina Passes Gay Marriage Ban Amendment One". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
  14. ↑ Robertson, Campbell (May 8, 2012). "North Carolina Voters Pass Same-Sex Marriage Ban". The New York Times.
  15. ↑ "Marriage Amendment passes in North Carolina by double-digits". The McDowell News. May 9, 2012. Archived from the original on May 16, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
  16. ↑ Constitutional amendment certified as election fraud questions winnowed
  17. ↑ "Legal Marriage Court Cases — A Timeline". www.buddybuddy.com. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
  18. ↑ "Gay marriage cases in 5 states offer broad view". Washington Post. January 16, 2014. Archived from the original on February 4, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2014.
  19. 1 2 "Pending Marriage Equality Cases: North Carolina" . Retrieved August 24, 2014.
  20. ↑ Barnes, Robert (October 6, 2014). "Supreme Court declines to review same-sex marriage cases". Washington Post. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
  21. ↑ Snow, Justin (July 28, 2014). "Federal appeals court rules Virginia same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional". Metro Weekly. Retrieved July 28, 2014.
  22. ↑ Blythe, Anne (October 8, 2014). "Federal judge in Greensboro lifts stay on challenges to North Carolina gay marriage ban". News Observer. Retrieved October 8, 2014.
  23. ↑ "Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment, October 8, 2014". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  24. ↑ "Motion to intervene, October 9, 2014". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  25. ↑ "Memo in support of motion to intervene". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  26. ↑ "Order on Intervention". U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  27. ↑ "Order Enjoining North Carolina from enforcing marriage bans". U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  28. ↑ "Berger v. Fisher-Borne Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment". Scribd.com. Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved January 14, 2015.
  29. ↑ "NC reactions to gay marriage ruling". WRAL. June 26, 2015.
  30. ↑ "General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper" (PDF). Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  31. ↑ Paulson, Michael (April 28, 2014). "North Carolina's Gay-Marriage Ban Is Challenged by Church". The New York Times. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  32. ↑ "Freedom to Marry in North Carolina". Freedom to Marry. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  33. ↑ "Clergy and same-sex couples seek the freedom the marry and religious freedom in North Carolina" . Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  34. ↑ "2014: Reactions to the United Church of Christ's lawsuit seeking marriage equality. Possible future impact of the lawsuit". Religious Tolerance. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  35. ↑ "Plaintiffs' Brief, October 7, 2014". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  36. ↑ "Order denying intervention". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 10, 2014.
  37. ↑ Snow, Justin (October 10, 2014). "Federal judge strikes down North Carolina same-sex marriage ban". Metro Weekly. Retrieved October 10, 2014.
  38. ↑ "Memorandum of Decision and Order". Scribd.com. U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Retrieved October 19, 2014.
  39. ↑ Liddy, Chuck (February 2, 2018). "North Carolina's first same-sex marriage takes place in Raleigh". News Observer.
  40. ↑ "2014-OCT-10: Same-sex couples become eligible to obtain marriage licenses & to marry". Religious Tolerance. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  41. ↑ Yurcaba, Jo (January 6, 2021). "LGBTQ people now eligible for domestic violence protections in all 50 states". NBC News.
  42. ↑ "M.E. v. T.J." appellate.nncourts.org. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  43. ↑ "NC H229 2017". LegiScan. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  44. ↑ "NC S595 2020". LegiScan. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  45. ↑ "NC SB112 2023". LegiScan. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
  46. ↑ "North Carolina Senate overrides governor's veto of marriage opt-out bill". Yahoo News. June 3, 2015.
  47. ↑ "House overrides Magistrate same-sex marriage veto". ABC 11 Eyewitness News. June 11, 2015.
  48. ↑ Colleen Jenkins (December 9, 2015). "North Carolina sued over gay marriage opt-out law". Yahoo! News. Reuters.
  49. ↑ Morrill, Jim; Gordon, Michael (June 29, 2017). "NC magistrates can continue to refuse to marry gay couples after court ruling". The Charlotte Observer.
  50. ↑ NC H780 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session
  51. ↑ North Carolina Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Ban Same-Sex Marriage NBC News
  52. ↑ NC House bill seeks to make gay marriage illegal again, defying Supreme Court The News & Observer
  53. ↑ House speaker: Gay marriage ban bill going nowhere WRAL
  54. ↑ "Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Code of Ordinances, Chapter 50: Family Law". Municode Library. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  55. ↑ "Cherokee affirms gay marriage ban". Smoky Mountain News. Retrieved December 27, 2015.
  56. ↑ Knoepp, Lilly (September 10, 2021). "Eastern Band Of Cherokee Same-Sex Marriage Ban Stands". Blue Ridge Public Radio.
  57. 1 2 Sabine Lang (1998). Men as women, women as men: changing gender in Native American cultures . University of Texas Press. ISBN   0-292-74701-2.
  58. ↑ Joyner, Michael; Whitlock, Tommy Lee. "Raven Rock Cherokee-English Dictionary" (PDF). culturev.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 16, 2024. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
  59. ↑ Driskill, Qwo-Li (January 2016). Asegi stories: Cherokee queer and two-spirit memory. University of Arizona Press. ISBN   9780816530489.
  60. ↑ "Census Snapshot" (PDF). Williams Institute. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
  61. ↑ "PCT1405 Couple Households, By Type". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  62. ↑ Blades, Meteor. "North Carolina Voters Approve Anti-Marriage Equality Amendment, Until They Learn What It Does". Daily Kos . Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  63. ↑ "State ensures gay hospital visitation rights". QnotesCarolinas.com. April 22, 2008.
  64. ↑ "Carrboro Town Code: Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 8, 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  65. ↑ "Town of Chapel Hill: General Policies". Archived from the original on May 12, 2012. Retrieved August 19, 2009.
  66. ↑ "Town of Chapel Hill: Domestic Partnership". Archived from the original on February 24, 2012. Retrieved August 19, 2009.
  67. ↑ "Durham Votes to Allow Benefits for Domestic Partners". WRAL-TV. April 7, 2003. Archived from the original on August 20, 2014. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  68. ↑ "9:00 A.M. Worksession - Agenda". Durham County Government. September 2, 2003. Retrieved April 4, 2012. In conjunction with the County Attorney's legal opinion that only same-sex domestic partner benefits can be offered to County employees without the violation of the Commissioners' oaths of office, the Human Resources Department has completed the actions necessary to make this offering possible.
  69. 1 2 "Orange County, NC To Offer Partner Benefits". December 1, 2003. Archived from the original on August 20, 2014. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  70. ↑ "Orange County Commission Agenda Action Items" (PDF). September 21, 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  71. ↑ "May North Carolina Local Government Employers Offer Domestic Partner Benefits?" (PDF). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. November 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2012. In North Carolina, only Durham and Orange counties, the cities of Durham and Greensboro, and the towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro offer domestic partner benefits.
  72. ↑ "Greensboro To Move Forward on Domestic Partnership Benefits". Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  73. ↑ "North Carolina County Passes Domestic Partner Benefits Despite Defamatory Comments from Commissioner Bill James" (PDF). Archived from the original on October 20, 2020. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  74. ↑ Comer, Matt (December 16, 2009). "Mecklenburg Commissioners Approve DP Benefits". Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  75. ↑ "Domestic Partner Registry Available May 2". April 27, 2011. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011. Retrieved April 23, 2012.
  76. ↑ Comer, Matt (June 26, 2012). "Charlotte council approves domestic partner benefits, scraps capital plan". QnotesCarolinas.com.
  77. ↑ "North Carolina Family Policy Council: Buncombe Domestic Partner Benefits". March 22, 2013. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.