Same-sex marriage in Oregon

Last updated

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Oregon since May 19, 2014, when Judge Michael J. McShane of the U.S. District Court for the District Court of Oregon ruled in Geiger v. Kitzhaber that Oregon's 2004 state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. A campaign that was then under way to win voter approval of a constitutional amendment legalizing same-sex marriage was suspended following the decision. In July 2015, Governor Kate Brown signed legislation codifying same-sex marriage in various Oregon statutes. The law change went into effect on January 1, 2016. [1] [2]

Contents

Oregon began recognizing same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions in October 2013. Domestic partnerships, providing a subset of the rights and benefits of marriage, have been recognized since 2008. Oregon was the seventeenth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

In March and April 2004, Multnomah County issued marriage licenses to more than 3,000 same-sex couples until ordered by a state judge to stop doing so. In November, Oregon voters approved an amendment to the State Constitution that made it state policy to recognize only marriages "between one man and one woman". The validity of the licenses issued the previous spring was disputed, and the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in April 2005 that the newly adopted constitutional amendment had invalidated them.

2004–2005

Marriage licenses issued

On March 3, 2004, Multnomah County began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples after its attorney issued a legal opinion that such marriages are lawful. [3] [4] [5] On that day, Multnomah County issued 422 marriage licenses, compared to the 68 it issues on an average day. Local businesses reported an increase in the sales of flowers and other marriage-related services directly related to the beginning of same-sex marriages. According to the 2000 U.S. census, 3,242 same-sex couples were living in the county. [6] Neighboring Washington and Clackamas counties announced that they were studying Multnomah County's legal opinion, but did not plan to immediately follow suit.

At a hearing on March 9, 2004, after the county had issued approximately 1,700 marriage licenses to same-sex couples, County Circuit Judge Dale Koch refused to issue an injunction to stop the county from continuing the process. [7] A later study by The Oregonian showed that out the approximately 1,700 same-sex couples married in the first week, 2,026 spouses were from Multnomah County, while about 900 others came from other locations in Oregon, about 490 from the state of Washington, and 30 from other states. [8] On March 10, 2004, the Oregon Legislative Counsel, Greg Chaimov, issued an opinion that "state law requires a county clerk to license the marriage of a same-sex couple." [9] The office of Attorney General Hardy Myers issued an opinion on March 12, 2004, after reviewing it with Governor Ted Kulongoski, that concluded that Oregon law prohibits county clerks from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples; that the Oregon Supreme Court would likely find denying such licenses violates Article I, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution; but that current state practices should not change in anticipation of such a ruling. It also said that the Attorney General's office lacked the authority to order Multnomah County to cease issuing licenses for same-sex marriages. [10]

On March 15, 2004, Multnomah County commissioners announced that they would continue to issue licenses to same-sex couples. [11] On March 16, following public hearings, Benton County commissioners voted 2–1 to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on March 24, but reversed their decision on March 22 after receiving two letters from the Attorney General and a phone call threatening the arrest of the county clerk, [12] and decided to issue no marriage license at all pending a decision by the Multnomah County Court. [13] [14]

With the consent of the state, three same-sex couples sued the state of Oregon in Multnomah County Court, including Mary Li and Rebecca Kennedy, the first same-sex couple to receive a marriage license from Multnomah County. At a hearing before Judge Frank Bearden on April 16, 2004, in Li and Kennedy v. State of Oregon, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Basic Rights Oregon represented the plaintiffs and the Oregon Department of Justice and the Defense of Marriage Coalition defended the state's position. [15] On April 20, 2004, Bearden ordered the county to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and ordered the state to recognize the 3,022 marriage licenses already issued. The Oregon state registrar had been holding the completed licenses pending a court decision as to their validity, rather than entering them into the state's records system. Bearden also found that the Oregon Constitution would likely allow some form of marriage rights to same-sex couples, and directed the Legislative Assembly to act on the issue within 90 days of the start of its next session. He ruled that if the Assembly failed to address the issue within that time, he would allow Multnomah County to resume issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. It was understood that both parties would appeal the decision. In July 2004, the Court of Appeals lifted the temporary ban blocking the registration of the marriage licenses issued by Multnomah County. The state announced that processing would take a week and began doing so within hours of the court's action. [16]

2004 ballot initiative

On May 21, 2004, the Defense of Marriage Coalition received approval for the language of a proposed initiative to prohibit same-sex marriage. They began circulating petitions to obtain the 100,840 valid signatures needed by July 2 to place the initiative on the November ballot. On November 2, 2004, voters approved Ballot Measure 36, a constitutional amendment defining the marriage of "a man and a woman" as the only one recognized by the state, by a margin of 57% to 43%. The Defense of Marriage Coalition said that opponents of Measure 36 outspent their group more than 2 to 1. [17] The now-defunct amendment read: "It is the policy of Oregon, and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage." [18]

Oregon Supreme Court review

About 200 people staging a pro-LGBT protest in downtown Portland to advocate for the legalization of same-sex marriage, October 2009 LGBT equality protest in Portland.jpg
About 200 people staging a pro-LGBT protest in downtown Portland to advocate for the legalization of same-sex marriage, October 2009

On December 15, 2004, the Oregon Supreme Court heard arguments in the appeal of Li and Kennedy v. State of Oregon. Oregon argued that Multnomah County lacked the authority to issue same-sex marriage licenses and that Ballot Measure 36 was retroactive, making the issue of those licenses moot. The Defense of Marriage Coalition argued that Measure 36 was not retroactive, there had been no constitutional violation of the rights of same-sex couples, and Multnomah County did not have the authority to issue same-sex marriage licenses even to remedy a constitutional violation. The ACLU argued that Measure 36 was not retroactive, that the rights of same-sex couples under the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Oregon Constitution had been violated, and that counties are required to remedy perceived constitutional violations.

On April 14, 2005, the Oregon Supreme Court decided Li and Kennedy v. State of Oregon, ruling that Multnomah County lacked the authority to remedy a perceived violation of the Oregon Constitution and that all marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples were void when issued. The court noted that the Oregon Constitution had since been amended to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples and it therefore declined to rule as to whether or not same-sex couples had any rights under the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Oregon Constitution. [19]

2005–2008

Following the passage of the constitutional amendment and the Supreme Court's decision in Li and Kennedy, state officials began efforts to establish domestic partnerships granting virtually all of the rights and benefits of marriage. A bill was first passed in the Oregon State Senate in July 2005, but failed to pass the House of Representatives. Following the 2006 elections, similar legislation was re-introduced and passed both chambers of the Assembly. Governor Ted Kulongoski signed it into law on May 9, 2007. Since February 4, 2008, same-sex couples have had access to domestic partnerships, which guarantee almost all of the rights of marriage.

2013–2014

Recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriages

On October 16, 2013, based on an opinion from the Oregon Department of Justice, [20] the state's Chief Operating Officer, Michael Jordan, announced that Oregon would begin recognizing same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions "for the purposes of administering state programs." [21]

Oregon Same-Sex Marriage Amendment

In February 2013, Basic Rights Oregon formed the group Oregon United for Marriage to put an initiative legalizing same-sex marriage on the November 2014 ballot. [22] The initiative would have replaced the state's constitutional amendment restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples with provisions guaranteeing the right of all persons to marry without respect to gender. [23] On July 26, 2013, the petition campaign to get the required signatures was launched. [24] [25] By early December 2013, the 116,284 minimum required signatures had been reached, but signature collection continued. [26] [27] The campaign was endorsed by the Democratic Party of Oregon, [28] and various major businesses. [29] [30]

The campaign gathered more than 160,000 signatures, enough to place its proposal, the Oregon Same-Sex Marriage Amendment, on the November 4, 2014 statewide ballot. Following the May 2014 U.S district court decision in Geiger v. Kitzhaber, striking down Oregon's ban on same-sex marriage, the group announced that it was "confident that the freedom to marry is secure in Oregon" and that it would not proceed with the measure. [31] [32]

Federal lawsuit

On October 15, 2013, two couples, an unmarried lesbian couple and two men already married in Canada, filed a lawsuit, Geiger v. Kitzhaber, in U.S. district court in Eugene, challenging the Oregon Constitution's ban on same-sex marriage. [33] This made Oregon the 20th U.S. state to have a federal lawsuit challenging its ban on same-sex marriage filed since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Windsor in June 2013 invalidated part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [34] Two more couples and the Basic Rights Education Fund filed another same-sex marriage case on December 19, 2013, with this latter case captioned Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber.

On January 22, 2014, Judge Michael J. McShane consolidated the two lawsuits and scheduled oral arguments for April 23. [35] On February 20, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum told the court that she believed "that performing same-sex marriages in Oregon would have no adverse effect on existing marriages, and that sexual orientation does not determine an individual's capacity to establish a loving and enduring relationship." She found it impossible to defend the state's ban "under any standard of review" and her office would no longer defend the ban in court. The plaintiffs in both Geiger and Rummell filed motions asking for summary judgment; this procedure used in cases where there are no material issues of fact requiring a trial, and a fast resolution is desired. [36] The court heard oral arguments on motions for summary judgment in the consolidated lawsuit on April 23, 2014. While all parties present supported same-sex couples' right to marry, Judge McShane questioned whether Oregon voters should get another say on the issue, since they approved the amendment defining marriage; and whether to stay the ruling and await guidance from same-sex marriage cases pending in the U.S. courts of appeal, or to implement the ruling immediately. The court scheduled another oral argument session for May 14, where the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), an organization that opposes same-sex marriage, tried to qualify for intervention in the case. [37] [38] On May 14, Judge McShane rejected NOM's attempt to intervene in the case, ruling that the group was unreasonably late in filing its request to intervene and that it failed to convincingly demonstrate that it should be allowed to intervene on behalf of three anonymous Oregon-based members of NOM. [39]

Ruling

Standing outside the Multnomah County office, marriage plaintiffs Deanna Geiger and Janine Nelson hear the news that they won their case for same-sex marriage in Oregon. Deanna Geiger and Jean Nelson.jpg
Standing outside the Multnomah County office, marriage plaintiffs Deanna Geiger and Janine Nelson hear the news that they won their case for same-sex marriage in Oregon.

At noon on May 19, 2014, Judge McShane issued his opinion, ruling that the state's ban was unconstitutional. [40] He wrote: [41]

Because Oregon's marriage laws discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without a rational relationship to any legitimate government interest, the laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Minutes after the decision was announced at noon, officials in at least four counties were fulfilling requests for marriage licenses from same-sex couples. The first to wed in Multnomah County were two of the plaintiffs, Deanna Geiger and Janine Nelson. [41] That county issued 96 licenses the first day, and judges officiated at wedding ceremonies in a Portland ballroom. [42] [43] [44] Governor John Kitzhaber, the named defendant, said "I strongly support Judge McShane's decision to overturn institutional discrimination in Oregon's constitution. No longer will Oregonians tolerate discrimination against the gay, lesbian, and transgender community. [...] Now, finally, all Oregonians will have the opportunity to make a legal commitment to the person they love. Every person and every family in Oregon deserves that chance. Today is a win for love, for families, and for freedom." Senator Jeff Merkley called it "a historic day for Oregon", and Senator Ron Wyden said, "Judge Michael McShane's decision marks a significant moment in Oregon's civil rights history, and it's an important step toward equal rights for all Americans. Every American deserves the freedom to marry the person they love, and, starting today, all Oregonians will have that choice. I am proud to have stood with Oregon's same-sex couples in this struggle for marriage equality for nearly 20 years, and it's important to keep pushing until that right extends to all Americans." The Republican House Minority Leader, Mike McLane, issued a statement, "For those that believe marriage is a religious covenant, the origin of which predates America, today's federal court ruling won't change that. For those that believe marriage is a legal union between two people that is recognized and enforced by our state government, today's ruling is a logical extension of the Supreme Court's ruling last summer. Our society must embrace both views. My hope is that the process of reconciliation in Oregon will continue as we move forward with respect for each other." Val Hoyle, the Majority Leader of the House, said "I married the person who I love over 22 years ago, and I'm thrilled that all Oregonians now have the freedom to do the same." [45]

NOM immediately asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to issue an emergency stay of McShane's ruling, which that court denied on grounds of lack of standing. [46] NOM then filed a request on May 27 with Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy seeking to block Judge McShane's order. [47] Justice Kennedy referred the matter to the entire Supreme Court, [48] which on June 4 rejected NOM's request. [49] [50]

2015–2016

In July 2015, several amendments to marriage and spousal laws were passed by the Legislative Assembly and signed into law by Governor Kate Brown. The reforms made all mentions to marriage in statutory law gender-neutral, and came into effect on January 1, 2016. [51]

In February 2016, the Assembly passed legislation defining marriage as "a union between two people" irrespective of gender. It passed the House in a 43–13 vote and the Senate in an 18–11 vote. [52] On March 14, 2016, Governor Brown signed the bill into law, and it took effect immediately. The statutory definition of marriage is now: "Marriage is a civil contract entered into in person by males at least 17 years of age and females at least 17 years of age, who are otherwise capable, and solemnized in accordance with ORS 106.150." [53] [54] Oregon's statutes were also amended to read the following:

Any privilege, immunity, right or benefit granted by statute, administrative or court rule, policy, common law or any other law to an individual because the individual is or was married to an individual of a different sex, is granted on equivalent terms, substantive and procedural, to an individual who is or was married to an individual of the same sex. [ORS 106.345 (3)]

2023–present

In April 2023, Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber introduced Senate Joint Resolution 33, a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to same-sex marriage, along with abortion and gender-affirming care. On April 27, 2023, the Committee on Rules adopted, by a vote of 3 ayes and 2 nays, SJR 33. On May 2, 2023, Senators Tim Knopp and Bill Hansell recommended that SJR 33 be adopted with an amendment repealing almost everything and replacing it with a repeal of the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. On June 15, 2023, Republicans announced, as part of a deal reached with Democrats to end their 6 week walkout, that Democrats had agreed to kill SJR 33. Republicans said they offered support for the provisions on same-sex marriage. That same day, the Senate adopted, by a vote of 22 ayes, 7 absent and 1 excused, a motion to rerefer SJR 33 to the Committee on Rules, thus dying in committee with the adjourned sine die of the 2023 Regular Session on June 25, 2023. [55] [56] [57] [58] [59]

Native American nations

Same-sex marriage is legal on the reservations of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians, [60] the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, [61] the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the Coquille Indian Tribe, and the Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe. The Coquille Indian Tribe was the first tribe in Oregon, and the United States, to legalize same-sex marriage, when its Tribal Council voted 5–2 in 2008 to allow same-sex couples to marry on tribal land. The law went into effect on May 20, 2009. At least one of the parties to the marriage must be a member of the tribe. Kitzen and Jeni Branting were the first same-sex couple to marry on Coquille sovereign land in Coos Bay on May 24. Kitzen Branting said, "My tribe recognizes the marriage, so that is really important to me. Anytime we come to a tribal function, I know my marriage is just as valid as anyone else's marriage." At the time, Oregon did not recognize same-sex marriage, but the tribe, as a federally recognized sovereign nation, was not bound by the Oregon Constitution. [62] The Tribal Council of the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians voted 6–0 to legalize same-sex marriage on August 10, 2014, and the Tribal Council of the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians approved a marriage ordinance permitting same-sex couples to marry on May 15, 2015. [63] The Tribal Council of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community passed a same-sex marriage law on October 28, 2015, and it went into effect on November 18, 2015. [64] The Law and Order Code of the Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe states that marriage is governed by state law rather than tribal law. As such, same-sex marriage is legal in the reservation of the tribe, which they share with Nevada near the community of McDermitt. [65]

While there are no records of same-sex marriages as understood from a Western perspective being performed in Native American cultures, there is evidence for identities and behaviours that may be placed on the LGBT spectrum. Many of these cultures recognized two-spirit individuals who were born male but wore women's clothing and performed everyday household work and artistic handiwork which were regarded as belonging to the feminine sphere. [66] This two-spirit status allowed for marriages between two biological males or two biological females to be performed among some of these tribes. The Northern Paiute people refer to two-spirit people who crossed out of the masculine gender as tudayapi (pronounced [tɨˈɾajapai] ), and they were free to marry either men or women. [66] In the Sahaptin language, they are known as wáƛ̓uks (pronounced [wátɬʼuks] ). [67] Among the Klamath people, two-spirit individuals are known as tʼwiniˑqʼ (pronounced [ˈt’wɪniːq’] ). [68] The tʼwiniˑqʼ wore women's clothing and "behaved as women". They married cisgender men, and usually took the role of a shaman and were credited with great spirit power. The Takelma call them xawisa (pronounced [xaªwǐːsaª] ). [66] [69] In Chinook Jargon, two-spirit people are called burdash (pronounced [ˈbʊɹdɑːʃ] ). Its origin is from the French word bardache, which gave in English berdache , now dated and considered offensive. [70] Two-spirit is translated as naaxe me’staa~ni (pronounced [náːxeméʔstãːni] ) in Tolowa.

Economic impact

An April 2014 study by the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles found that allowing marriage for same-sex couples would add $47.3 million to Oregon's economy during the first three years. [71] [72] The study estimated that allowing same-sex marriage would also add 468 new jobs to the state economy.

Marriage statistics

The following table shows the number of same-sex marriages performed in Oregon since legalization according to the Oregon Center for Health Statistics. [73]

Number of marriages in Oregon [73]
YearSame-sex marriagesTotal marriages% same-sex
2014 (from May)2,02722,5109.00%
20151,70427,7946.13%
20161,90128,0236.78%
20171,54727,6045.60%
20181,23326,5014.65%
20191,09625,2754.34%
20201,03221,5564.79%
20211,01124,0804.20%
20221,26425,6464.93%

Most same-sex marriages are performed in Multnomah, Washington and Lane counties; Multnomah accounting for approximately 39% of the state's same-sex marriages by the end of 2019. Wheeler County was the last county in Oregon where a same-sex marriage took place, as its first marriage was performed in 2022. The first same-sex marriage in Gilliam County was performed in 2020. [73] In 2014 and 2015, lesbian couples accounted for the majority of same-sex marriages; 68% in 2014 and 64% the following year.

The 2020 U.S. census showed that there were 11,948 married same-sex couple households (4,725 male couples and 7,223 female couples) and 9,058 unmarried same-sex couple households in Oregon. [74]

Public opinion

A June 2011 Public Policy Polling (PPP) survey found that 48% of Oregon voters thought marriage for same-sex couples should be legal, while 42% thought it should be illegal and 11% were not sure. A separate question on the same survey found that 76% of Oregon voters supported the legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 43% supporting same-sex marriage, 33% supporting civil unions but not marriage, 22% favoring no legal recognition and 1% not sure. [75] A June 2012 PPP survey found that 46% of Oregon voters thought same-sex marriage should be legal, while 45% thought it should be illegal and 9% were not sure. A separate question on the same survey found that 74% of Oregon voters supported the legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 44% supporting same-sex marriage, 30% supporting civil unions but not marriage, 23% favoring no legal recognition and 3% not sure. [76] A December 2012 PPP survey found that 54% of Oregon voters thought marriage for same-sex couples should be allowed, while 40% thought it should not be allowed and 5% were not sure. [77]

According to an April 2013 DHM Research poll, 49% of Oregon voters supported amending the Oregon Constitution to allow marriage for same-sex couples, while 42% were opposed and 9% were undecided. [78] [79]

A February 2014 poll released by Oregon United For Marriage showed that 55% of respondents supported same-sex marriage, while 41% were opposed. [80] According to a May 2014 DHM Research poll, 58% of Oregon voters supported amending the Oregon Constitution to permit same-sex marriages, 36% were opposed and 6% were undecided. [81] A survey conducted by PPP that same month found that 54% of Oregon voters thought same-sex marriage should be allowed, while 40% thought it should not be allowed and 6% were not sure. [82]

A 2015 survey from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) showed that 62% of Oregon respondents supported same-sex marriage. In 2016, the polling organization placed support at 65%. [83] [84] In 2017, the PRRI placed support at 67%, with 25% opposed and 8% undecided. [85] A 2020 survey from the same polling organization showed that 73% of Oregon respondents supported same-sex marriage, while 20% were opposed and 7% were undecided or did not answer. [86] A survey conducted by the PRRI between March and November 2021 showed that 73% of Oregon respondents were in favor of same-sex marriage, while 26% were opposed and 1% were undecided. [87] According to a survey conducted by the same polling organization between March 11 and December 14, 2022, 78% of Oregon respondents supported same-sex marriage, while 22% were opposed. [88]

See also

Related Research Articles

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Oregon Ballot Measure 36</span> Referendum banning same-sex marriage

Ballot Measure 36 was a 2004 initiative in the U.S. state of Oregon. It amended the Oregon Constitution to define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. The initiative passed with 1,028,546 votes in favor, and 787,556 votes against in the November 2, 2004 general election. It is one of a number of U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage. However, unlike other similar ballot measures passed on or near the same election date, the amendment did not explicitly ban civil unions between same-sex couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utah Constitutional Amendment 3</span> 2004 referendum

Utah Constitutional Amendment 3 was an amendment to the Utah state constitution that sought to define marriage as a union exclusively between a man and woman. It passed in the November 2, 2004, election, as did similar amendments in ten other states.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in California since June 28, 2013. The State of California first issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples from June 16, 2008 to November 5, 2008, a period of approximately 4 months and 20 days, as a result of the Supreme Court of California finding in the case of In re Marriage Cases that barring same-sex couples from marriage violated the Constitution of California. The issuance of such licenses was halted from November 5, 2008 through June 27, 2013 due to the passage of Proposition 8—a state constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriages. The granting of same-sex marriages recommenced following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, which restored the effect of a federal district court ruling that overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional.

The San Francisco 2004 same-sex weddings took place between February 12 and March 11, 2004, after San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom directed the city-county clerk to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and a number of interest groups sued to end the practice. About 4,000 such licenses were issued before the California Supreme Court ordered a halt to the practice on March 11. On August 12, 2004, the California Supreme Court voided all of the licenses that had been issued in February and March.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Florida since January 6, 2015, as a result of a ruling in Brenner v. Scott from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The court ruled the state's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional on August 21, 2014. The order was stayed temporarily. State attempts at extending the stay failed, with the U.S. Supreme Court denying further extension on December 19, 2014. In addition, a state court ruling in Pareto v. Ruvin allowed same-sex couples to obtain marriage licenses in Miami-Dade County on the afternoon of January 5, 2015. In another state case challenging the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples, a Monroe County court in Huntsman v. Heavilin stayed enforcement of its decision pending appeal and the stay expired on January 6, 2015. Florida was the 35th U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, upon the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On October 6, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of an appellate court ruling in Wolf v. Walker that had found Wisconsin's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. The appellate court issued its order prohibiting enforcement of the state's ban on same-sex marriage the next day and Wisconsin counties began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately. Wisconsin had previously recognized domestic partnerships, which afforded limited legal rights to same-sex couples, from August 2009 until they were discontinued in April 2018.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2008.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Colorado since October 7, 2014. Colorado's state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage was struck down in state district court on July 9, 2014, and by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on July 23, 2014. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals had already made similar rulings with respect to such bans in Utah on June 25 and Oklahoma on July 18, which are binding precedents on courts in Colorado. On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the Tenth Circuit cases, and the Tenth Circuit lifted its stay. On October 7, the Colorado Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit cleared the way for same-sex marriages to begin in Colorado. Colorado was the 25th U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against enforcement of Nevada's same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada approved in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Arizona since October 17, 2014. The U.S. state had denied marriage rights to same-sex couples by statute since 1996 and by an amendment to its State Constitution approved by voters in 2008. On October 17, Judge John W. Sedwick ruled in two lawsuits that Arizona's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, and enjoined the state from enforcing its ban, effective immediately. Attorney General Tom Horne said the state would not appeal that ruling, and instructed county clerks to comply and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in South Carolina since a federal court order took effect on November 20, 2014. Another court ruling on November 18 had ordered the state to recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. Following the 2014 ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bostic v. Schaefer, which found Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional and set precedent on every state in the circuit, one judge accepted marriage license applications from same-sex couples until the South Carolina Supreme Court, in response to a request by the Attorney General, ordered him to stop. A federal district court ruled South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on November 12, with implementation of that decision stayed until noon on November 20. The first same-sex wedding ceremony was held on November 19.

This article contains a timeline of significant events regarding same-sex marriage in the United States. On June 26, 2015, the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges effectively ended restrictions on same-sex marriage in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael J. McShane</span> American judge (born 1961)

Michael J. McShane is an American lawyer serving as the chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. He previously served as a state court judge on the Oregon Multnomah County Circuit Court from 2001 to 2013.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Oklahoma since October 6, 2014, following the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On that day, following the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to review Bishop v. Smith, a case that had found the ban unconstitutional, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Oklahoma to recognize same-sex marriages. On January 14, 2014, Judge Terence C. Kern of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma declared the state's statutory and constitutional same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional. The case, Bishop v. Smith, was stayed pending appeal. On July 18, 2014, a panel of the Tenth Circuit upheld Kern's ruling overturning Oklahoma's same-sex marriage ban. However, the panel put its ruling on hold pending disposition of a petition for certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court. On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the request for review, leaving the Tenth Circuit Court's ruling in place. State officials responded by implementing the Tenth Circuit's ruling, recognizing same-sex marriage in the state.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015. Previously, the U.S. state of Texas had banned same-sex marriage both by statute since 1973 and in its State Constitution since 2005. On February 26, 2014, Judge Orlando Luis Garcia of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas found that Texas's ban on same-sex marriages was unconstitutional. On April 22, 2014, a state court came to the same conclusion. Both cases were appealed. The district court's decision was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, but before that court could issue a ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all same-sex marriage bans in the United States in Obergefell on June 26, 2015. Within a few months of the court ruling, all counties had started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, except for Irion County, which announced in 2020 that it would begin issuing licenses to same-sex couples, making it the last county in the United States to comply with the ruling.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2014.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, following the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear an appeal of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in Bostic v. Schaefer. Same-sex marriages subsequently began at 1:00 p.m. on October 6 after the Fourth Circuit issued its mandate, and since then Virginia has performed legal marriages of same-sex couples and recognized out-of-state same-sex marriages. Previously, the state had passed a statute prohibiting same-sex marriage in 1975, and further restrictions were added in 1997 and 2004, which made "void and unenforceable" any arrangements between same-sex couples bestowing the "privileges or obligations of marriage". Voters approved an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia reinforcing the existing laws in 2006. On January 14, 2014, a U.S. district court judge ruled in Bostic that Virginia's statutory and constitutional ban on the state recognition of same-sex marriages were unconstitutional, a decision upheld by the Fourth Circuit on July 28, 2014.

<i>Geiger v. Kitzhaber</i> 2014 court case in Oregon, US, about same-sex marriage

Geiger v. Kitzhaber is a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon that requires Oregon to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize same-sex marriages established in other jurisdictions. The decision arose from two consolidated cases that alleged that Oregon's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, Article 15, § 5, and all related marriage statutes, violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Among the several defendants, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed appearances in the case to defend Oregon's position, but declined to defend the constitutionality of the bans and ordered state agencies to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages established elsewhere.

In the United States, the history of same-sex marriage dates from the early 1940s, when the first lawsuits seeking legal recognition of same-sex relationships brought the question of civil marriage rights and benefits for same-sex couples to public attention though they proved unsuccessful. However marriage wasn't a request for the LGBTQ movement until the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Washington (1987). The subject became increasingly prominent in U.S. politics following the 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court decision in Baehr v. Miike that suggested the possibility that the state's prohibition might be unconstitutional. That decision was met by actions at both the federal and state level to restrict marriage to male-female couples, notably the enactment at the federal level of the Defense of Marriage Act.

References

  1. ↑ HB 2478 - Oregon 2015 Regular Session
  2. ↑ House Bill 2478 (2015) - Oregon Legislature Bill Tracker
  3. ↑ Multnomah County authorizes same-sex marriages starting Wednesday
  4. ↑ "Gay Couples Marry As Portland Ore. Says 'I Do'". Archived from the original on March 9, 2006. Retrieved February 20, 2014.
  5. ↑ "Judge upholds ban: A Marion County judge rejects constitutional challenges to last year's Ballot Measure 36". The Oregonian. Retrieved February 3, 2008.
  6. ↑ 2000 and 2010 Census Profile
  7. ↑ Parker, Jim; Abe Estimada (March 8, 2004). "Multnomah Co. judge refuses to halt same-sex marriages". KGW TV. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved March 29, 2007.
  8. ↑ Same-sex Marriage Statistics 2004
  9. ↑ Gregory A. Chaimov, Legislative Counsel (March 8, 2004). "Same-Sex Marriage: letter to Senator Kate Brown (Senate Democratic Leader)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2008.
  10. ↑ Oregon Department of Justice: March 12, 2004, accessed November 1, 2012
  11. ↑ Law, Steve (March 16, 2004). "Same-sex weddings continue; validity in doubt". Salem Statesman Journal. Archived from the original on January 25, 2006. Retrieved March 29, 2007.
  12. ↑ Kranz, Rachel; Cusick, Tim (2014). Gay Rights. Infobase Publishing. p. 48. ISBN   978-1438125497.
  13. ↑ "Oregon county bans all marriages". NBC . March 24, 2004. Archived from the original on May 16, 2022. Retrieved December 22, 2022.
  14. ↑ Zernike, Kate (March 27, 2004). "Gay? No Marriage License Here. Straight? Ditto". The New York Times.
  15. ↑ Mission Statement of the Defense of Marriage Coalition
  16. ↑ Opinions Issued in 2004
  17. ↑ Fortmeyer, John. "Christian voters' impact in Oregon still under review". Archived from the original on December 4, 2004. Retrieved March 17, 2007.
  18. ↑ Wikisource:Oregon Constitution/Article XV
  19. ↑ "Mary Li and Rebecca Kennedy et al. v. State of Oregon et al". Oregon Judicial Department. April 14, 2005. Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
  20. ↑ "Oregon Department of Justice: Letter" (PDF). Oregon Live. Retrieved August 30, 2014.
  21. ↑ Damewood, Andrea (October 16, 2013). "Oregon To Recognize Marriages of Gay Couples Wed Out of State". Willamette Week. Archived from the original on February 24, 2014. Retrieved February 13, 2014.
  22. ↑ "Backers of gay marriage will take their cause to Oregon ballot in 2014". Oregon Live. February 11, 2013.
  23. ↑ "Oregon United for Marriage Turns in 2,000 Sponsorship Signatures on the Freedom to Marry and Religious Protection Initiative". Oregon United for Marriage. February 19, 2013. Retrieved July 1, 2013.
  24. ↑ "Oregon United Launches Petition Campaign to Put Marriage on the Ballot". Human Rights Campaign. July 24, 2013. Archived from the original on July 26, 2013.
  25. ↑ "Oregon Says I Do".
  26. ↑ Zheng, Yuxing (August 30, 2013). "Marijuana legalization, same-sex marriage advocates say federal decisions strengthen 2014 Oregon ballot initiative efforts". Oregon Live. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
  27. ↑ "Oregon Campaign For Gay Marriage Hits Signature Goal". On Top Magazine. December 8, 2013.
  28. ↑ "Democratic Party of Oregon Endorses Marriage Equality Campaign". Democratic Party of Oregon. June 14, 2013.
  29. ↑ "Intel, on pending Oregon ballot measure: We support marriage equality". Oregon Live. October 19, 2013.
  30. ↑ Anna Staver (November 19, 2013). "Nike gives $280,000 to support same-sex marriage in Oregon". Statesman Journal.
  31. ↑ Staver, Anna. "Oregon gay marriage campaign winds down". Statesman Journal. Retrieved August 30, 2014.
  32. ↑ "Oregon Same-Sex Marriage Amendment (2014)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved February 20, 2014.
  33. ↑ Erica Nochlin (October 15, 2013). "Lawsuit filed to overturn Oregon's same-sex marriage ban". KATU news.
  34. ↑ James Nichols (October 16, 2013). "Portland Trailblazers Back Gay Marriage, Becoming First NBA Team To Do So". Huffington Post.
  35. ↑ "Judge consolidates Oregon gay-marriage lawsuits". Washington Post. January 22, 2014. Archived from the original on December 22, 2018. Retrieved January 23, 2014.
  36. ↑ Johnson, Chris (February 20, 2014). "Oregon AG won't defend marriage ban in court". Washington Blade. Retrieved February 20, 2014.
  37. ↑ Mapes, Jeff (April 23, 2014). "Gay marriage: Judge Michael McShane provides little clue in how he will rule on Oregon case". The Oregonian. Retrieved April 23, 2014.
  38. ↑ Mapes, Jeff (April 22, 2014). "Judge won't rule in Oregon gay marriage case until at least May 14 while he decides on intervenor". The Oregonian. Retrieved April 23, 2014.
  39. ↑ Mapes, Jeff (May 14, 2014). "Gay marriage: Judge rejects attempt to intervene; ruling to overturn Oregon ban may follow".
  40. ↑ Hubbard, Saul (May 19, 2014). "Oregon's gay marriage ban struck down". Archived from the original on January 12, 2016.
  41. 1 2 Mapes, Jeff (May 19, 2014). "Oregon gay marriage ban struck down by federal judge; same-sex marriages begin". The Oregonian. Retrieved August 30, 2014.
  42. ↑ Mears, Bill (May 19, 2014). "Federal judge strikes down Oregon's same-sex marriage ban". CNN News. Retrieved August 28, 2014.
  43. ↑ Carson, Teresa (May 19, 2014). "Same-sex couples wed in Oregon after gay marriage ban lifted". Reuters. Retrieved August 28, 2014.
  44. ↑ Chokshi, Niraj (May 20, 2014). "Gallery: Gay couples wed after Oregon marriage ban struck down". Washington Post. Retrieved August 28, 2014.
  45. ↑ "Reaction pours in as Oregon gay marriage ban overturned". KTVZ. May 19, 2014.
  46. ↑ Mapes, Jeff (May 19, 2014). "Ninth Circuit strikes down National Organization's request to halt judge's decision".
  47. ↑ Associated Press (May 27, 2014). "Group seeks SCOTUS stay of Oregon gay marriage decision".
  48. ↑ "Order List of the United States Supreme Court" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  49. ↑ Liptak, Adam (June 4, 2014). "Supreme Court Rebuffs Call to End Same-Sex Marriages in Oregon". New York Times. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  50. ↑ "Nat'l Organization for Marriage v. Geiger, Deanna L., et al" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved June 5, 2014.
  51. ↑ Bullard Law: 2015 Oregon Legislative Session Wrap-Up
  52. ↑ "Legislature reinforces same-sex marriage". Statesman Journal. February 25, 2016.
  53. ↑ 2016 Regular Session HB 4127
  54. ↑ House Bill 4127
  55. ↑ Templeton, Amelia (April 19, 2023). "Oregon Democrats propose constitutional amendment on abortion, same-sex marriage, gender-affirming care". OPB.
  56. ↑ "Oregon Joint Resolution 33". LegiScan. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  57. ↑ "Oregon lawmakers make deal to end Senate walkout. Here's how key bills were changed". Oregon Public Broadcasting. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  58. ↑ "Republican-led walkout ends after more than a month as Oregon Senate resumes business". The Oregonian. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  59. ↑ "SJR 33 2023 Regular Session". Oregon Legislative Assembly. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  60. ↑ "Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians, Title 4: Domestic Relations, Chapter 4-7: Marriage" (PDF). Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  61. ↑ "Siletz Marriage Ordinance" (PDF). Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians. May 15, 2015.
  62. ↑ Robinson, B.A. (May 5, 2012). "Adoption of SSM by the Coquille Nation of Oregon". Religious Tolerance.
  63. ↑ "Siletz Tribe becomes latest to join marriage equality movement". Indianz.com. June 4, 2015. Retrieved December 27, 2015.
  64. ↑ "Tribal Council approves new marriage ordinance". Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community. Archived from the original on November 5, 2015. Retrieved November 2, 2015.
  65. ↑ "Chapter 5. Domestic Relations and Adoptions" (PDF). www.narf.org.
  66. 1 2 3 Sabine Lang (1998). Men as women, women as men: changing gender in Native American cultures . University of Texas Press. ISBN   0-292-74701-2.
  67. ↑ "Umatilla Dictionary: wáƛ̓uks" . Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  68. ↑ "Klamath Dictionary: tʼwiniˑqʼ" (PDF). ksw.shoin.ac.jp. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  69. ↑ Sapir, Edward (1909). Takelma Texts (PDF). Vol. 2. University of Pennsylvania.
  70. ↑ "Your Chinook Wawa Word of the Day: Burdash". Cascadia Department of Bioregion. October 30, 2019. Retrieved August 19, 2022.
  71. ↑ "Study estimates same-sex marriage would boost Oregon economy by $47 million over 3 years". Statesman Journal. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
  72. ↑ Fitzgerald, E.G. "Estimating the Economic Boost of Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Oregon" (PDF). UCLA. Retrieved April 16, 2014.
  73. 1 2 3 "Marriage by Month and County of Occurrence". Oregon Center for Health Statistics. Archived from the original on November 30, 2023. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  74. ↑ "PCT1405 Couple Households, By Type". United States Census Bureau. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  75. ↑ Public Policy Polling: Oregon in favor of legal gay marriage, Kitzhaber Solid
  76. ↑ Public Policy Polling: Oregon divided on gay marriage
  77. ↑ "Kitzhaber, Merkley lead potential foes" (PDF). 12/7/2012. Public Policy Polling.
  78. ↑ DHM Research survey
  79. ↑ Poll: Oregon voters back PERS restructuring; support dropping for expansion of gun background checks
  80. ↑ "An incredible day for freedom to marry in Oregon". Oregon United For Marriage. Retrieved February 20, 2014.
  81. ↑ Wilson, Reid (May 8, 2014). "Gay marriage initiative leads by wide margin in Oregon". The Washington Post . Retrieved May 8, 2014.
  82. ↑ "Kitzhaber, Merkley hold double-digit leads" (PDF). Public Policy Polling. May 29, 2014. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  83. ↑ "American Values Atlas 2015, Oregon". Public Religion Research Institute.
  84. ↑ "American Values Atlas 2016, Oregon". Public Religion Research Institute.
  85. ↑ "American Values Atlas 2017, Oregon". Public Religion Research Institute.
  86. ↑ "American Values Atlas: Same-sex marriage in Oregon". PRRI. Retrieved March 19, 2022.
  87. ↑ "PRRI – American Values Atlas 2021: Oregon". Public Religion Research Institute. Retrieved May 15, 2022.
  88. ↑ "PRRI – American Values Atlas 2022: Oregon". Public Religion Research Institute. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.