Recognition of same-sex unions in Armenia

Last updated

Armenia does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. The legal status of foreign same-sex marriages is unclear. On 3 July 2017, the Ministry of Justice reportedly stated that all marriages performed abroad are valid in Armenia, including marriages between people of the same sex. Article 143 of the Armenian Family Code states that Armenia recognizes foreign marriages as long as they conform with the legality of the territory where they were performed and contains no explicit prohibition of same-sex marriages. On the other hand, article 152 restricts the application of foreign law incompatible with the domestic public order. As of 2023, no instances of foreign same-sex marriage registrations are known. In 2019, Minister of Justice Rustam Badasyan said that the government does not recognize same-sex marriages. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Following a 2015 referendum, the Constitution of Armenia has generally been believed to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples, although the Constitutional Court has never confirmed or rejected this interpretation. [5] [6]

Background

Same-sex marriage (Armenian : Նույնասեռ ամուսնություն, nuynaseṙ amusnutʿyun, pronounced [nujnɑˈsɛr,-sɛɾɑmusnuˈtʰjun,-tʰʏn] ) is not legal in Armenia and there is little public debate surrounding the issue. The Government of Armenia has close ties with the Armenian Apostolic Church, which opposes same-sex marriage. In August 2019, the Minister of Justice, Rustam Badasyan, said that Armenia does not recognize same-sex marriages "despite Armenia signing the Istanbul Convention". However, Badasyan also stated that same-sex cohabitation is permitted and that violence against any person is "unacceptable". [7] [8] [9] Civil unions, which would offer some of the rights and benefits of marriage, are also not recognized. However, Armenia is obliged under the European Court of Human Rights' ruling in Fedotova and Others v. Russia to provide legal recognition to same-sex unions. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees a right to private and family life, places a positive obligation on all member states of the Council of Europe to recognize same-sex partnerships. [10] [11]

In 2006, a same-sex couple celebrated an informal wedding ceremony at the Etchmiadzin Cathedral in Vagharshapat. [12] [13] An article published about this improvised marriage in the "168 Zham" (168 Hours) newspaper provoked a scandal and indignation of local conservative media outlets, politicians and religious officials. [14]

In December 2017, Father Vazken Movsesian, serving in the Diocese of the West of the Apostolic Church, based in California, expressed his personal support for same-sex marriage, becoming one of the most high-profile supporters of same-sex marriage in the church. In an interview with Equality Armenia, Movsesian likened the historic persecution of Armenians by Turkey to the persecution faced by LGBT people. "We've been persecuted because we were not accepted, because we were different. As an Armenian Christian, how can I possibly close my eyes to what's going on in the world? And it's not just in Armenia, just everywhere, this intolerance.", he said. [4]

Laws regarding same-sex partnerships in Europe1 .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Marriage Civil union Limited domestic recognition (cohabitation) Limited foreign recognition (residency rights) Unrecognized Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples 1 May include recent laws or court decisions that have not yet entered into effect. v t e Same-sex marriage map Europe detailed.svg
Laws regarding same-sex partnerships in Europe¹
  Marriage
  Civil union
  Limited domestic recognition (cohabitation)
  Limited foreign recognition (residency rights)
  Unrecognized
  Constitution limits marriage to opposite-sex couples
¹ May include recent laws or court decisions that have not yet entered into effect.

Family Code

Article 10 of the Family Code, adopted in 2004, states that marriage requires "the mutual voluntary consent of a man and a woman". Article 11, which lists several outlawed marriages (including bigamy, marriages between close relatives and marriages between adopters and adopted), does not contain explicit prohibitions on marriages between people of the same sex. [15]

On 18 October 2017, Deputy Tigran Urikhanyan of the Prosperous Armenia party proposed a bill to introduce an explicit ban on same-sex marriages in the Family Code. [16] On 15 November 2018, the Armenian Government expressed its opposition to the bill, stating that the Family Code already prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages. "Armenia's Constitution already defines that marriage is possible only between woman and man. Besides, according to Family Code marriage is possible in case of reciprocal consent of a man and a woman and in case they are 18 years old [ sic ]", said Arsen Manukyan, Deputy Minister of Labor and Social Affairs. [17] [18] [19] The National Assembly rejected the bill in November 2019, labelling it "redundant", while also rejecting a bill which would have explicitly banned adoption by same-sex couples. [20]

Constitutional amendment

The Constitution of Armenia was amended in a referendum in 2015 to read: [21] [5]

Article 35. Freedom to Marry

1. A woman and a man having attained the marriageable age shall have the right to marry and form a family with free expression of their will. The marriageable age and the procedure for marriage and divorce shall be prescribed by law.
2. A woman and a man are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

3. Freedom to marry may be restricted only by law with the aim of protecting health and morals.

Many politicians have stated that the constitutional wording bans same-sex marriage. [22] [23] On the other hand, members of the Venice Commission, when analyzing the draft constitution, said that the wording "should not be interpreted as a legal obstacle to the recognition of same-sex marriages". Argam Stepanyan, the head of the Civil Status Acts Registration Agency, a division of the Ministry of Justice, later said in an interview that there is no constitutional prohibition on same-sex marriage in Armenia. [24] Several politicians and human rights activists have said that the wording "notes" the right of a man and a woman to marry, but does not explicitly state that marriage is between a man and a woman. [25]

Recognition of marriages performed abroad

On 3 July 2017, the Ministry of Justice reportedly stated that all marriages performed abroad are valid in Armenia, including marriages between people of the same sex. According to the Family Code, marriages between Armenian citizens and those between Armenian citizens and foreigners or stateless persons, which have been registered outside Armenia, are valid inside the country after consular legalization. The code makes no reference to the sexes of the married spouses and stipulates that marriages registered in another country, which are in line with that particular state's legislation, are valid in Armenia as long as they are also compliant with the Armenian public order. [3] [26] [4] [27] As of 2023, the Statistical Committee of Armenia had not documented a single case of recognition of a foreign same-sex marriage. [28] It is not known if recognition would give such couples all the rights of marriage under domestic law.

Public opinion

A 2017 poll from the Pew Research Center showed that 91% of Armenians favored the Apostolic Church's position of not performing same-sex marriages, while 4% disagreed. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000 California Proposition 22</span> Referendum banning same-sex marriage

Proposition 22 was a law enacted by California voters in March 2000 stating that marriage was between one man and one woman. In November 2008, Proposition 8 was also passed by voters, again only allowing marriage between one man and one woman. The Act was proposed by means of the initiative process. It was authored by state Senator William "Pete" Knight and is known informally as the Knight initiative. Voters adopted the measure on March 7, 2000, with 61% in favor to 39% against. The margin of victory surprised many, since a Field Poll immediately prior to the election estimated support at 53%, with 40% against and 7% undecided.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Venezuela</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Venezuela face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Both male and female types of same-sex sexual activity are legal in Venezuela, but same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for the same legal protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Also, same-sex marriage and de facto unions are constitutionally banned since 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Bulgaria</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Bulgaria face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Both male and female same-sex relationships are legal in Bulgaria, but same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for the same legal protections available to opposite-sex couples. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation has been banned since 2004, with discrimination based on "gender change" being outlawed since 2015. In July 2019, a Bulgarian court recognized a same-sex marriage performed in France in a landmark ruling. For 2020, Bulgaria was ranked 37 of 49 European countries for LGBT rights protection by ILGA-Europe. Like most countries in Central and Eastern Europe, post-Communist Bulgaria holds socially conservative attitudes when it comes to such matters as homosexuality and transgender people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Arizona Proposition 107</span> Failed referendum on a statewide same-sex marriage ban

Arizona Proposition 107 was a proposed same-sex marriage ban, put before voters by ballot initiative in the 2006 general election. If passed, it would have prohibited the U.S. state of Arizona from recognizing same-sex marriages or civil unions. The state already had a statute defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman and prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Armenia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Armenia face legal and social challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents, due in part to the lack of laws prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity and in part to prevailing negative attitudes about LGBT persons throughout society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state</span>

This article summarizes the same-sex marriage laws of states in the United States. Via the case Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States legalized same-sex marriage in a decision that applies nationwide, with the exception of American Samoa and sovereign tribal nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Alabama Amendment 774</span>

The Amendment 774 of 2006, also known as Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment, is an amendment to the Alabama Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The legislature passed Alabama Act 2005-35, which placed this amendment on the election ballot. The referendum was approved by 81% of the voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Arkansas Amendment 3</span> Same-sex marriage ban

Constitutional Amendment 3 of 2004, is an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 75% of the voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nikolay Alexeyev</span> Russian LGBT rights activist and lawyer

Nikolay Alexandrovich Alexeyev is a Russian LGBT rights activist, lawyer and journalist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe</span>

Debate has occurred throughout Europe over proposals to legalise same-sex marriage as well as same-sex civil unions. Currently 33 of the 50 countries and the 8 dependent territories in Europe recognise some type of same-sex union, among them most members of the European Union (24/27). Nearly 43% of the European population lives in jurisdictions where same-sex marriage is legal.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against enforcement of Nevada's same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada approved in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

Russia does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. Since 2020, the Russian Constitution has explicitly outlawed same-sex marriage. The Family Code of Russia also contains provisions forbidding same-sex marriages, which the Constitutional Court upheld as constitutional in 2006. Opinion polls have shown a decline in support for same-sex marriage in Russia. This declining trend has been attributed to anti-gay state propaganda, the 2013 gay propaganda law in particular, and growing anti-Western and traditionalist sentiment in Russia under Vladimir Putin.

Ukraine does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. The Constitution of Ukraine defines marriage as between "a woman and a man". The issue of legal recognition for same-sex couples has become particularly acute after the start of Ukraine's accession to the European Union in 2022 and the Russian large-scale invasion of Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Paraguay</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Paraguay face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Both male and female types of same-sex sexual activity are legal in Paraguay, but same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for all of the same legal protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Paraguay remains one of the few conservative countries in South America regarding LGBT rights.

Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859, was a federal lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and decided on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. It challenged the federal constitutionality of Nebraska Initiative Measure 416, a 2000 ballot initiative that amended the Nebraska Constitution to prohibit the recognition of same-sex marriages, civil unions, and other same-sex relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in California</span>

California is seen as one of the most liberal states in the U.S. in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights, which have received nationwide recognition since the 1970s. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1976. Discrimination protections regarding sexual orientation and gender identity or expression were adopted statewide in 2003. Transgender people are also permitted to change their legal gender on official documents without any medical interventions, and mental health providers are prohibited from engaging in conversion therapy on minors.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in North Dakota since the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, which invalidated state bans on same-sex marriage throughout the United States. Previously, North Dakota had restricted marriage to the "union of one man and one woman" both by statute and in its State Constitution.

Same-sex unions are currently not recognized in Honduras. Since 2005, the Constitution of Honduras has explicitly banned same-sex marriage. In January 2022, the Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to this ban, but a request for the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to review whether the ban violates the American Convention on Human Rights is pending. A same-sex marriage bill was introduced to Congress in May 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of same-sex unions in the Philippines</span>

The Philippines does not legally recognize same-sex unions, either in the form of marriage or civil unions. The Family Code of the Philippines defines only recognizes marriages between "a man and a woman". The 1987 Constitution itself does not mention the legality of same-sex unions or has explicit restrictions on marriage that would bare same-sex partners to enter into such arrangement.

Palau does not recognise same-sex marriage, civil unions or any other form of recognition for same-sex couples.

References

  1. ↑ "Глава Минюста Армении исключил, что государство признает однополые браки после ратификации Стамбульской конвенции". panorama (in Russian). 26 August 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  2. ↑ ԸՆՏԱՆԵԿԱՆ ՕՐԵՆՍԳԻՐՔ (Հոդված 143. Հայաստանի Հանրապետության տարածքից դուրս կնքված ամուսնությունների ճանաչումը) (in Armenian). 2005.
  3. 1 2 "Same-sex marriages registered abroad are valid in Armenia". www.panarmenian.net.
  4. 1 2 3 "Father Vazken Movsesian Joins Equality Armenia Board". Asbarez. November 28, 2017.
  5. 1 2 "Legislation: National Assembly of RA". www.parliament.am.
  6. ↑ Human Rights Situation in Armenia 2015 was a regressive year for LGBT people's rights in Armenia, since the newly accepted Constitution restricted marriage as a union only between a man and a woman
  7. ↑ "Глава Минюста Армении исключил, что государство признает однополые браки после рати". Panorama (in Russian). 26 August 2019.
  8. ↑ "The Human Rights Situation of LGBT People in Armenia During 2020 Annual Report" (PDF). Pink Armenia. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  9. ↑ "Gap analysis of Armenian criminal law in light of the standards established by the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence". rm.coe.int. 28 October 2023.
  10. ↑ "ECtHR: refusal of any form of legal recognition and protection for same-sex couples breaches Convention". EU Law Live. 17 January 2023.
  11. ↑ Fedele, Giulio (23 July 2021). "The (Gay) Elephant in the Room: Is there a Positive Obligation to Legally Recognise Same-Sex Unions after Fedotova v. Russia?". EJIL: Talk!. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  12. ↑ ""Love and Loyalty": Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear - Features - ArmeniaNow.com" . Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  13. ↑ "GAYRUSSIA - Равные права без компромиссов" . Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  14. ↑ "GAYRUSSIA - Равные права без компромиссов". Archived from the original on 2 December 2007. Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  15. ↑ "ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԸՆՏԱՆԵԿԱՆ". arlis.am (in Armenian).
  16. ↑ "Tsarukyan faction lawmaker introduces bill on banning same-sex marriages in Armenia". Aysor.am. 18 October 2018.
  17. ↑ "Armenia's legislation already bans same-sex marriages, no additional changes necessary: acting deputy minister". Aysor.am. 15 November 2018.
  18. ↑ "Armenia Cabinet rejects initiative on same-sex marriages". Armenia News. 15 November 2018.
  19. ↑ "Cabinet rejects bill on banning same-sex marriage citing existing prohibition in Constitution". Armenpress . 15 November 2018.
  20. ↑ Khulian, Artak (12 November 2019). "Armenian Parliament Refuses To Hear Bill Banning Same-Sex Marriage". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty.
  21. ↑ "Constitution of Armenia". president.am.
  22. ↑ ""Менее равные": ЛГБТИ-правозащитники в Армении, Беларуси, Казахстане и Кыргызстане" (PDF). Amnesty International (in Russian). p. 75.
  23. ↑ "Armenian Constitution to ban same-sex marriage". Radio Liberty. 4 September 2015.
  24. ↑ "Европейские эксперты считают, что однополые браки в Армении можно разрешить". ИА REGNUM (in Russian). 27 August 2015.
  25. ↑ "The Ministry of Justice's response on same-sex marriage". LGBTnews.am. 6 December 2016. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019.
  26. ↑ Dawn Ennis (December 5, 2017). "Orthodox Christian Cleric Supports Same-Sex Marriage in Armenia". Los Angeles Blade.
  27. ↑ "Armenia Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages Performed Abroad". NewNowNext.com. 4 July 2017.
  28. ↑ Vic Gerami (2019-02-19). "'You have no right to call yourself Armenian' Say Gay Man's Attackers". The Armenian Weekly. Retrieved 2019-03-06.
  29. ↑ "Religious Belief and National Belonging in Central and Eastern Europe" (PDF). Pew. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.