G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board

Last updated

G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.svg
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Full case name Gavin Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board
ArguedMay 26 2020
DecidedAugust 26 2020
Citation972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020)
Case opinions
Majority Floyd, joined by Wynn
Concurrence Wynn
Dissent Niemeyer

G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board was a court case dealing with transgender rights in the United States. The case involved a transgender boy attending a Virginia high school, who sued the local school board after he was forced to use girls' restrooms based on his assigned gender under the school board's policy. While the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of the student based on Obama administration policy related to Title IX protections, the election of Donald Trump changed the underlying policy. A pending hearing before the Supreme Court of the United States was vacated and the case was sent back to the Fourth Circuit.

Contents

Due to recent case law, including the Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County , the Fourth Circuit ruled again in favor of the student; the Supreme Court refused to hear the case by denying certiorari in 2021, allowing the Fourth Circuit's judgment to stand.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination "on the basis of sex" in educational programs and activities that receive financial assistance from the federal government. Congress left enforcement of this to the executive branch, which by 1980, fell under the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within the Department of Education. [1]

Upon his election in 2010, the OCR within the Obama administration took the position that Title IX protects LGBT students from harassment on the basis of sex stereotypes. [2] Subsequently, OCR brought a number of successful enforcement actions under Title IX on behalf of students who were subject to harassment or discrimination on the basis of their gender identity, gender expression, or failure to conform to gender stereotypes. [3] Eight of the cases were settled in favor of the students. [3] Several private lawsuits were brought as well on similar grounds. [3] [4] Further, in January 2015, the Department of Education also issued guidance to all federally-funded schools, known as the Ferg-Cadima letter, that stated that "a school generally must treat transgender students consistent with their gender identity." [5] [6]

Case background

Gavin Grimm, wearing a trans pride flag cape and a T-shirt reading "No Body Is Illegal", speaks on stage at the 2018 Trans March San Francisco. Trans March San Francisco 20180622-3445.jpg
Gavin Grimm, wearing a trans pride flag cape and a T-shirt reading "No Body Is Illegal", speaks on stage at the 2018 Trans March San Francisco.

Gavin Grimm [lower-alpha 1] is a transgender man who was assigned female at birth and was perceived as a girl through middle school; in high school he began to present himself as a boy, including using the boys' restroom at the school. Several parents of other students complained to the Gloucester County school board; speakers addressing the board used derogatory terms and name-calling at a public hearing. [7] The school board passed a regulation that access to changing rooms and bathrooms "shall be limited to the corresponding biological genders, and students with gender identity issues shall be provided an alternative appropriate private facility". [8] When he refused to use the girls' bathroom, Grimm was offered the use of some broom closets that had been retrofitted into unisex bathrooms. [9] Grimm refused to use those as well, opting to use a bathroom in the school nurse's office. [9] [6]

After the regulation was adopted, Grimm continued to face gender-based discrimination by the school board even after he began hormone therapy (which altered his physical form), underwent reconstructive chest surgery, and received an official Virginia state I.D. card supplementing his Virginia birth certificate listing his gender as male. [10]

Initial hearings

Grimm, under these conditions, found himself the subject of ridicule by the other students, and through his parent, sued the school board on grounds of Title IX discrimination and the Equal Protection Clause in June 2015 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Grimm obtained legal representation from the American Civil Liberties Union and referred the case to the DOJ. [11] The federal government agreed to intervene in the case on Grimm's behalf, writing to the court that Title IX "prohibits discrimination based on sex, including gender identity, transgender status, and nonconformity to sex stereotypes". [11] [12]

In legal court proceedings, Grimm asserted he had been allowed to use the boys' bathroom for seven weeks without incident and had faced gender-based discrimination after the regulation of the Gloucester County School Board was implemented. Prior to the hearing, on December 18, 2014, the ACLU had already filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), based on the nature of the school board's restroom policy. [13] Despite Grimm's case mirroring similar cases that the OCR had been pursuing and the existing guidance from the Department of Education, Judge Robert G. Doumar of the District Court dismissed the suit. In his ruling, Judge Doumar held that Title IX's operative provision should be read narrowly to cover discrimination on the basis of genetic "sex" only, and not gender identity or expression. [7] [14] [15] Doumar also held that on the basis that under Title IX, the school had provided comparable facilities as directed under 34 U.S.C.   § 106.33. The court also rejected Grimm's request for a preliminary injunction to use the boys' restroom while litigation proceeded. [6] During the proceedings in the District Court, Judge Doumar made a number of idiosyncratic statements from the bench, saying that being transgender is a "mental disorder", [14] delivering off-topic criticism of the federal government on the issues of marijuana enforcement [7] and sanctuary cities, [14] and explaining that Grimm is a female who "wants to be male". [7] In reviewing the case, the Court of Appeals criticized Judge Doumar's conduct in the courtroom, writing that his "extraneous remarks [and] suppositions ... marred the hearing". [15]

Grimm appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit, in a 2–1 decision in April 2016, overruled the District Court and remanded the case back to the District Court. The majority held that the District Court had ignored the guidance in the Ferg-Cadima letter from the Department of Education, the controlling agency in Title IX protections in the context of the Chevron and Auer deferences, in dismissing the case, as well as to reconsider the preliminary injunction on Grimm's use of the boys' restroom. [6] [16] [15] [17] The school board moved for rehearing en banc , but the Fourth Circuit declined to rehear the case. [18] In June 2016, the District Court granted the preliminary injunction to allow Grimm to use the boys' restroom. [19]

The Gloucester County school board petitioned to the Supreme Court. The school board raised questions on the Auer deference that the Fourth Circuit had relied on in giving weight to the Department of Education's interpretation of Title IX and via the unpublished Ferg-Cadima letter, and to whether the Department of Education's interpretation of comparable facilities or that of 34 U.S.C.   § 106.33 had prevalence. The Supreme Court, in a 5–3 vote in August 2016, agreed to put a stay on the District Court's preliminary injunction, with Justice Stephen Breyer joining the conservative sides as to "courtesy" to maintain the status quo while the Court decided if they would take the case. Subsequently, in October, the Court granted certification of the case, with the oral arguments later to have been heard on March 28, 2017. [20]

Shortly upon taking office in January 2017, President Donald Trump took steps to reject past guidance set by the Obama administration related to transgender rights. On February 22, 2017, Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos formally reversed past Department of Education guidance including the Ferg-Cadima letter on claims the regulation was not based on a sound legal foundation, allowing schools to establish their own policies as necessary under Title IX. [21] Lawyers in Grimm's case recognized this drastically affected the legal underpinning of the case though had expected to be able to still argue in Grimm's favor on other points, [22] but on March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court vacated their case as a result of the change in the administration's policy, vacated the Fourth Circuit's prior ruling, and remanded the case back to the lower courts to be retried under the current interpretation of Title IX protections. [23]

Rehearings

Since 2017, Grimm had graduated from high school as well as undergoing reassignment surgery to be recognized by the state as male, [24] and had amended the complaint to focus on the harm to his constitutional rights at school and the impact of intervening case law. Judge Arenda Wright Allen of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied the Gloucester County School Board's motion to dismiss the case in May 2018, and ruled that Grimm had a valid claim of discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as well as the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause. [25] [26] The District Court rehearings were held in July 2019. [27] The District Court this time found for both of Grimm's claims on Title IX and Equal Protection Clause in August 2019, asserting that Grimm had faced emotional harm from using the restroom assigned to his biological sex. [28] Grimm was awarded attorney's fees, court expenses, and a nominal $1 in damages, and the court issued a permanent injunction requiring the school board to update Grimm's official school records to reflect his gender identity. [29] [30]

The school board appealed to the Fourth Circuit, which upheld the District Court's decision on August 26, 2020, on a 2–1 majority. The majority opinion was guided heavily by the Supreme Court decision Bostock v. Clayton County which had determined that in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for employment discrimination, "on the basis of sex" includes protection for sexual orientation and gender identity. [24] [31]

The Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 28, 2021, with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissenting, leaving the decision of the Fourth Circuit intact. [32] In August 2021, a settlement was announced under which the district agreed to pay the student $1.3 million for his legal fees. [33] [34] [35]

Impact and similar cases

G.G. v. Gloucester County was one of several cases over the past decade where students challenged school policies that required transgender students to use of bathrooms based on legal sex or sex assigned at birth, instead of in line with their gender identity. The question was decided by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in 2013 in favor of a transgender girl in Doe v. Regional School Unit 26 . In 2022, the 11th Circuit found in favor of a Florida school's decision to restrict bathroom usage on the basis of biological sex, in Adams v. The School Board of St. Johns County, Florida .

In some states, legislatures have been influenced by Christian right organizations such as the Alliance Defending Freedom to pass "bathroom bills" prohibiting transgender students from using the school bathrooms aligning with their gender identity. [36] [37] [38]

In the years following his court case, Grimm has experienced post-traumatic stress disorder, poverty, and housing instability. [39]

Notes

  1. ↑ G.G. in the court filings as Grimm was a minor at the time the case was filed.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Andrew Wynn</span> American judge (born 1954)

James Andrew Wynn Jr. is an American jurist. He serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and formerly served on both the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the North Carolina Supreme Court.

Gloucester High School is an accredited public high school located four miles from Gloucester Courthouse in Gloucester County, Virginia, United States. It is operated by Gloucester County Public Schools, a Virginia public school division.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Utah</span>

The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Utah have significantly evolved in the 21st century. Protective laws have become increasingly enacted since 2014, despite the state's reputation as socially conservative and highly religious. Utah's anti-sodomy law was invalidated in 2003 by Lawrence v. Texas, and fully repealed by the state legislature in 2019. Same-sex marriage has been legal since the state's ban was ruled unconstitutional by federal courts in 2014. In addition, statewide anti-discrimination laws now cover sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing, and the use of conversion therapy on minors is prohibited. In spite of this, there are still a few differences between the treatment of LGBTQ people and the rest of the population, and the rights of transgender youth are restricted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transgender Law Center</span> American civil rights organization

The Transgender Law Center (TLC) is the largest American transgender-led civil rights organization in the United States. They were originally California's first "fully staffed, state-wide transgender legal organization" and were initially a fiscally sponsored project of the National Center for Lesbian Rights. The stated mission of TLC is to connect transgender people and their families to technically sound and culturally competent legal services, increase acceptance and enforcement of laws and policies that support California's transgender communities, and work to change laws and systems that fail to incorporate the needs and experiences of transgender people. TLC utilizes direct legal services, public policy advocacy, and educational opportunities to advance the rights and safety of diverse transgender communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul V. Niemeyer</span> American judge (born 1941)

Paul Victor Niemeyer is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Gloucester County Public Schools is a Virginia public school division serving Gloucester County, Virginia.

Robert George Doumar was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry F. Floyd</span> American judge (born 1947)

Henry Franklin Floyd is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

In the United States, the rights of transgender people vary considerably by jurisdiction. In recent decades, there has been an expansion of federal, state, and local laws and rulings to protect transgender Americans; however, many rights remain unprotected, and some rights are being eroded. Since 2020, there has been a national movement by conservative/right-wing politicians and organizations to target transgender rights. There has been a steady increase in the number of anti-transgender bills introduced each year, especially in Republican-led states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in California</span>

California is seen as one of the most liberal states in the U.S. in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights, which have received nationwide recognition since the 1970s. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1976. Discrimination protections regarding sexual orientation and gender identity or expression were adopted statewide in 2003. Transgender people are also permitted to change their legal gender on official documents without any medical interventions, and mental health providers are prohibited from engaging in conversion therapy on minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Tennessee</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Tennessee may experience some legal challenges that non-LGBTQ residents do not. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1996. Marriage licenses have been issued to same-sex couples in Tennessee since the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015.

The Women's Liberation Front (WoLF) is an American self-described radical feminist advocacy organization that opposes transgender rights and related legislation. It has engaged in litigation on transgender topics, working against the Obama administration's Title IX directives which defined sex discrimination to include gender identity. WoLF describes itself as radical feminist, and according to its mission statement, it wishes to "abolish regressive gender roles and the epidemic of male violence using legal arguments, policy advocacy, and public education". It has been described by news sources including The Washington Post, The Advocate, and NBC as feminist, but progressive and feminist organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)and the National Organization for Women (NOW) challenge this characterization, with NOW describing WoLF, alongside Women's Declaration International, as "anti-trans bigots disguised as feminists".

Doe v. Regional School Unit 26 was a landmark anti-discrimination case decided by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in June 2013 involving right of transgender student Nicole Maines to use the female bathroom in her high school. Upon initial filing, Maines was referenced by the pseudonym "Susan Doe" in court papers to protect her identity.

A bathroom bill is the common name for legislation or a statute that denies access to public toilets by gender or transgender identity. Bathroom bills affect access to sex-segregated public facilities for an individual based on a determination of their sex as defined in some specific way, such as their sex as assigned at birth, their sex as listed on their birth certificate, or the sex that corresponds to their gender identity. A bathroom bill can either be inclusive or exclusive of transgender individuals, depending on the aforementioned definition of their sex.

Title IX of the United States Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination "on the basis of sex" in educational programs and activities that receive financial assistance from the federal government. The Obama administration interpreted Title IX to cover discrimination on the basis of assigned sex, gender identity, and transgender status. The Trump administration determined that the question of access to sex-segregated facilities should be left to the states and local school districts to decide. The validity of the executive's position is being tested in the federal courts.

The legal and regulatory history of transgender and transsexual people in the United States begins in the 1960s. Such legislation covers federal, state, municipal, and local levels, as well as military justice. It reflects broader societal attitudes which have shifted significantly over time and have impacted legislative and judicial outcomes.

Since 2015, Township High School District 211, a public school district of the Chicago suburbs, has been the epicenter of multiple controversies surrounding its policies toward transgender student locker room access. Since January 2020, the district has implemented a policy of unrestricted locker room access corresponding to the gender identity of each student.

Dallas School District is a public school district in Dallas, Oregon. The district consists of eight schools that serve Dallas and surrounding areas.

<i>Adams ex rel. Kasper v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida</i> 2022 Florida court case on transgender students rights to access bathrooms

Adams ex rel. Kasper v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressing whether schools can separate bathrooms on the basis of biological sex, and thus refuse to allow transgender students to use bathrooms that match their gender identity. The case was filed by Erica Adams Kasper on behalf of Drew Adams, a minor at the time, against the school board of St. Johns County, Florida, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The lawsuit was filed after Adams was denied access to the boys' bathrooms at Nease High School. Kasper claimed that Adams's rights were being violated on account of discriminated on the basis of sex, which is prohibited by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and a violation of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facility Requirements Based on Sex Act</span>

The Facility Requirements Based on Sex Act, also known as Committee Substitute for House Bill 1521 , is a 2023 Florida anti-trans bathroom law which mandates that individuals must use restrooms, locker rooms, and changing facilities that correspond to their sex assigned at birth in some public, private and state-licensed facilities. It is one of two states (Utah) to make it a misdemeanor, in certain circumstances, for transgender people to use bathrooms or facilities consistent with their gender identity. It is the most populous state in the United States with a bathroom law. The law has generated significant controversy and legal challenges.

References

  1. ↑ "US Department of Education Principal Office Functional Statements: Office for Civil Rights". December 19, 2005. Retrieved May 25, 2016.
  2. ↑ U.S. Dept. of Education, Office for Civil Rights, "Dear Colleague" Letter, October 26, 2010
  3. 1 2 3 U.S. Department of Education, Resources for Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Students
  4. ↑ The LGBT Bar Association of Greater New York, Transgender Student Loses Fight over Expulsion from University of Pittsburgh over Restroom Issues Archived 2017-02-17 at the Wayback Machine , May 2015.
  5. ↑ U.S. Department of Education (January 7, 2015). "Dear Colleague Letter to Emily Prince from James A. Ferg-Cadima, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Education dated January 7, 2015" . Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Balingit, Moriah (April 19, 2016). "Federal appeals court sides with transgender teen, says bathroom case can go forward". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Mark Joseph Stern, Judge Bemoans Sanctuary Cities, Marijuana Legalization in Hearing on Trans Bathroom Access, Slate, July 28, 2015
  8. ↑ The Editorial Board, For Transgender Americans, Legal Battles Over Restrooms, The New York Times, July 27, 2015
  9. 1 2 John Riley, Gavin's Story: Gavin Grimm is the new face of the transgender movement, Metro Weekly, May 12, 2016
  10. ↑ "Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board".
  11. 1 2 Dominic Holden, Justice Dept. Backs Transgender Boy In Lawsuit Against School District, BuzzFeed, June 30, 2015
  12. ↑ G. G. v. Gloucester County School Board (E.D. Va.), Statement of Interest of the United States, June 29, 2015
  13. ↑ "G.G. [Gavin Grimm] v. Gloucester County School Board | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse".
  14. 1 2 3 Dominic Holden, Judge Throws Out Key Argument In Transgender Student Restroom Case, BuzzFeed, July 27, 2015
  15. 1 2 3 G. G. v. Gloucester County School Board (4th Cir.), Opinion of the Court, April 19, 2016
  16. ↑ Fausset, Richard (April 19, 2016). "Appeals Court Favors Transgender Student in Virginia Restroom Case". New York Times. Retrieved May 16, 2016.
  17. ↑ Christian Farias, Appeals Court Sides With Trans Student Denied Access To High School Boys Bathroom, Huffington Post, April 19, 2016
  18. ↑ U.S. Court Denies Motion to Reconsider Transgender Bathroom Ruling, Reuters, May 31, 2016
  19. ↑ Jacobo, Julia (June 23, 2016). "Court Orders Virginia School Board to Let Transgender Teen Use Boys' Bathroom". ABC News . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  20. ↑ Barnes, Robert; Balingit, Moriah (October 28, 2016). "Supreme Court takes up school bathroom rules for transgender students". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  21. ↑ Vitali, Ali; Williams, Pete; O'Hara, Mary Emily (February 22, 2017). "White House Reverses Obama-Era Transgender Bathroom Protections". NBC News . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  22. ↑ O'Hara, Mary Emily (February 23, 2017). "Transgender Teen Gavin Grimm on DOJ Guidance Change: 'It Hurts'". NBC News . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  23. ↑ Williams, Pete (March 6, 2017). "Supreme Court Rejects Gavin Grimm's Transgender Bathroom Rights Case". NBC News . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  24. 1 2 Finley, Ben; Lavoie, Denise (August 26, 2020). "Court: School transgender bathroom policy unconstitutional". Associated Press . Retrieved August 27, 2020– via MSN.
  25. ↑ Hurley, Lawrence. "U.S. court backs transgender student at center of bathroom dispute". Archived from the original on January 28, 2019. Retrieved September 18, 2021.
  26. ↑ Freeman, Vernon (May 22, 2018). "Federal court rules in favor of transgender student Gavin Grimm".
  27. ↑ Stein, Perry (July 23, 2019). "Gavin Grimm, transgender student who sought to use boys' restroom, back in court". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  28. ↑ Thuong, Debbie (August 9, 2019). "School that barred transgender student Gavin Grimm from boys' restroom violated his rights, judge rules". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  29. ↑ Fearing, Sarah (August 9, 2019). "Federal judge sides with Gavin Grimm in transgender rights, bathroom ban case". Williamsburg Yorktown Daily. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  30. ↑ "ACLU Comment on District Court Ruling in Favor of Gavin Grimm". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  31. ↑ Davies, Emily (August 26, 2020). "Court rules in favor of transgender student barred from using boys' bathroom". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  32. ↑ Supreme Court denies Gloucester school board's appeal in transgender bathroom ban case.
  33. ↑ Patel, Vimal (August 30, 2021). "Virginia School Board to Pay $1.3 Million in Transgender Student's Suit". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  34. ↑ "Gavin Grimm: School board will pay $1.3m in trans student's legal fees". The Independent. August 28, 2021. Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  35. ↑ "Gloucester County School Board to Pay $1.3 Million to Resolve Gavin Grimm's Case". American Civil Liberties Union (Press release). Retrieved August 31, 2021.
  36. ↑ O'Hara, Mary Emily (April 8, 2017). "This Law Firm Is Linked to Anti-Transgender Bathroom Bills Across the Country". NBC News . Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  37. ↑ Brown, Emma; Balingit, Moriah (February 29, 2016). "Transgender students' access to bathrooms is at front of LGBT rights battle" . The Washington Post . Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  38. ↑ Michaels, Samantha (April 25, 2016). "We Tracked Down the Lawyers Behind the Recent Wave of Anti-Trans Bathroom Bills". Mother Jones. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  39. ↑ Levin, Sam (October 12, 2024). "Gavin Grimm won a landmark victory for US trans youth. He now struggles to survive". The Guardian . Retrieved October 13, 2024.

See also

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.