LGBTQ rights in Alaska | |
---|---|
Status | Legal since 1980 |
Gender identity | Transgender people allowed to change legal gender, surgery not required |
Discrimination protections | Sexual orientation and gender identity covered in employment anti-discrimination laws statewide since 2020 ( Bostock v. Clayton County ) |
Family rights | |
Recognition of relationships | Same-sex marriage since 2014 ( Hamby v. Parnell ) |
Adoption | Same-sex couples allowed to adopt since 2014 (Hamby v. Parnell) |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Alaska have evolved significantly over the years. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBTQ people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.
Recent opinion polls have shown increasing levels of support for LGBT rights and same-sex marriage. A 2017 Public Religion Research Institute poll found a 57% majority and a 65% majority in favor of same-sex marriage and anti-discrimination legislation, respectively. [1] In 2018, voters in Anchorage rejected a voter initiative which would have stripped discrimination protections from transgender individuals. [2]
Alaska Native people have long had traditions of cross-dressing practices. The Aleut people recognize people born as male but who act, dress and behave as female, referred to as ayagigux̂ (literally man transformed into a woman). Tayagigux̂ (literally woman transformed into a man) refers to people assigned female at birth but who act and behave as male. Ayagigux̂ and tayagigux̂ have historically played certain important communal roles. Other people groups recognize similar terms in reference to transgender people and gender variance; male-to-female individuals are aranu'tiq among the Alutiiq, anasik among the Siberian Yupik, gatxan among the Tlingit, kanâ'ts among the Tshimshian, and aranaruaq among the Central Alaskan Yup'ik, whereas female-to-male individuals are uktasik among the Siberian Yupik, and angutnguaq among the Yup'ik. Nowadays, similarly to Canada, the term "two-spirit" is used to refer to people who embody these gender traits. [3]
After being purchased by the United States in 1867, the Department of Alaska had no criminal laws whatsoever for the following 17 years. In 1884, the United States Congress enacted a statute giving Alaska all the laws of Oregon. This included a provision criminalizing sodomy, whether heterosexual or homosexual, with a penalty of up to five years' imprisonment. The aforementioned customs of the Alaska Natives caused "alarm" in Congress. These customs, labelled "appalling degradation and vice" by Congress, resulted in an official investigation by a Senate committee, and in 1899 the enactment of a specific sodomy statute for Alaska. "Crime against nature", as it was called, was punishable by up to ten years in jail. In 1973, the Alaska Supreme Court held that oral sex did not violate the sodomy statute. [4]
In total, there have only been five recorded sodomy cases in Alaska; three of which involved heterosexual conduct and two homosexual conduct. [4] Alaska repealed its sodomy law on January 1, 1980. [5]
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Alaska since October 12, 2014, via the district court ruling of Hamby v. Parnell .
In 1996, the Alaska Legislature passed a bill banning same-sex marriage. Governor Tony Knowles declined to veto the bill, but allowed it to go become law without his signature on May 6, 1996. [6] In 1998, the Legislature passed a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, which was approved in a referendum on November 3, 1998. [7]
On May 12, 2014, five same-sex couples filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Anchorage challenging the state's constitutional same-sex marriage ban. [8] District Court Judge Timothy Burgess scheduled oral argument for October 10. [9]
On Sunday, October 12, 2014, less than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review similar cases from the Ninth Circuit Court Appeals, Latta v. Otter and Sevcik v. Sandoval , Judge Burgess ruled for the plaintiffs and declared Alaska's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. [10] Applications for marriage licenses were accepted from same-sex couples on October 13. [11] The first couple to marry were Kristine Hilderbrand and Sarah Ellis, who obtained a waiver of the three-day waiting period for obtaining a license and married in Utqiagvik, on October 13. [12]
Alaska permits adoption by married same-sex couples. In addition, lesbian couples have access to assisted reproduction services, such as in vitro fertilization. State law recognizes the non-genetic, non-gestational mother as a legal parent to a child born via donor insemination, but only if the parents are married. [13]
There are no surrogacy laws in Alaska, but courts are generally favorable to the process, whether gestational or traditional. Same-sex couples are treated in the same manner as opposite-sex couples. [14]
Alaska law does not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing, or public accommodations. An executive order, issued in 2002, prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in state employment. There is no provision for gender identity. [15]
In 1975, the Alaska State Human Rights Commission took a formal stance that sexual orientation should be included in the state's non-discrimination law. In 1987, legislation to add sexual orientation was introduced, with support from Governor Steve Cowper and Attorney-General Grace Berg Schaible, but never made it out of committee. [16] Similar legislation has been introduced numerous times over the years, but never brought to a vote. [17] In 2015, Representative Andy Josephson filed a bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. [18] The bill had two co-sponsors, but died without a vote. [19]
The municipalities of Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public and private employment, public accommodations, and housing. [20] [21] [22] This represents about 46% of the state population. [13]
In 2009, the Anchorage Assembly passed for the first time an ordinance to ban unfair discrimination against LGBTQ people in the city, by a vote of 7–4. [23] Mayor Dan Sullivan vetoed the ordinance. A second attempt occurred in 2012, but voters rejected the proposal, known as Proposition 5, in April 2012 with 57% opposed. [24] In September 2015, with support from Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, the Assembly again passed an ordinance to protect LGBTQ people from discrimination, by 9 votes to 2. [23] On April 3, 2018, Anchorage voters rejected Proposition 1 by a margin of 53% to 47%, which if passed would have stripped protections from transgender individuals. [25] [26]
In July 2020, the Ketchikan City Council unanimously passed an ordinance to prohibit unfair discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations, taking effect in mid-August. [27]
Fairbanks prohibits discrimination on account of sexual orientation against city employees. In February 2019, the City Council passed an ordinance banning discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Mayor Jim Matherly vetoed the ordinance a few days later, despite support from 80% of those who weighed in for several hours of public comments. [28]
On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidated with Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda , and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that discrimination in the workplace on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is discrimination on the basis of sex, and Title VII therefore protects LGBT employees from discrimination. [29] [30] [31]
Alaska state law does not address hate crimes based on gender identity or sexual orientation. [32] However, since the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was signed into law in October 2009 by President Barack Obama, U.S. federal law has provided penalty enhancements for crimes motivated by the victim's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. Hate crimes against LGBTQ people can be prosecuted in federal court.
Transgender persons in Alaska may request an amended birth certificate with a corrected name and gender marker. To request a change in the gender marker, the applicant must submit to the Department of Vital Records a "Birth Certificate Request Form", a photocopy of their ID or that of their parent or guardian, a letter from a medical or mental health provider attesting to appropriate clinical treatment for gender transition or a certified copy of a court ordered change of sex, and the payment of the fee. [33] Changing the gender marker on a driver's license requires submitting to the Division of Motor Vehicles a letter from a licensed provider attesting clinical treatment or an already updated birth certificate or a court order for gender change.
In September 2023, the Alaska Board of Education by a vote of 7-1 passed a rule to ban transgender individuals within any female sports and athletes throughout the state. [34]
In August 2020, Anchorage passed an ordinance by a vote of 9–2 to ban the use of conversion therapy on minors; the first city in Alaska to do so. [35] [36] [37]
A 2017 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) poll found that 57% of Alaska residents supported same-sex marriage, while 34% were opposed and 9% were undecided. Additionally, 65% supported an anti-discrimination law covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 27% were against. The PRRI also found that 52% were against allowing public businesses to refuse to serve LGBTQ people due to religious beliefs, while 44% supported allowing such religiously-based refusals.
A 2022 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) poll found that 70% of Alaska residents supported same-sex marriage, while 30% were opposed. The same poll found that 78% of Alaska residents supported an anti-discrimination law covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 23% were opposed. [1]
Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | % support | % opposition | % no opinion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Religion Research Institute | January 2-December 30, 2019 | 268 | ? | 59% | 23% | 18% |
Public Religion Research Institute | January 3-December 30, 2018 | 277 | ? | 68% | 23% | 9% |
Public Religion Research Institute | April 5-December 23, 2017 | 287 | ? | 65% | 27% | 8% |
Public Religion Research Institute | April 29, 2015-January 7, 2016 | 710 | ? | 73% | 22% | 5% |
Same-sex sexual activity legal | (Since 1980) | |
Equal age of consent (16) | ||
Recognition of same-sex marriages | (Since 2014) | |
Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples | (Since 2014) | |
Joint adoption by same-sex couples | (Since 2014) | |
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people allowed to serve openly in the military | (Since 2011) | |
Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military | (Since 2021) [38] | |
Intersex people allowed to serve openly in the military | (Current DoD policy bans "hermaphrodites" from serving or enlisting in the military) [39] | |
Right to change legal gender | ||
Ban on conversion therapy for minors | / (In Anchorage) [35] | |
Equal access to IVF for lesbian couples | ||
Surrogacy arrangements legal for gay male couples | ||
MSMs allowed to donate blood | (Since 2023, implemented on a FDA condition of being monogamous) [40] | |
Sexual orientation | Gender identity or gender expression | |
Anti-discrimination laws in employment | (Since 2020) | (Since 2020) |
Anti-discrimination laws in public accommodations | / (Varies by city) | / (Varies by city) |
Anti-discrimination laws in housing | / (Varies by city) | / (Varies by city) |
Anti-discrimination laws in credit and lending services | / (Varies by city) | / (Varies by city) |
Hate crime law | / (Under federal law, but not covered under state law) | / (Under federal law, but not covered under state law) |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wyoming may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Wyoming since 1977, and same-sex marriage was legalized in the state in October 2014. Wyoming statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, the cities of Jackson, Casper, and Laramie have enacted ordinances outlawing discrimination in housing and public accommodations that cover sexual orientation and gender identity.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Louisiana may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Louisiana as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized in the state since June 2015 as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. New Orleans, the state's largest city, is regarded as a hotspot for the LGBTQ community.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of West Virginia face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT persons. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1976, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since October 2014. West Virginia statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Delaware enjoy the same legal protections as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Delaware since January 1, 1973. On January 1, 2012, civil unions became available to same-sex couples, granting them the "rights, benefits, protections, and responsibilities" of married persons. Delaware legalized same-sex marriage on July 1, 2013.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Georgia enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBTQ rights in the state have been a recent occurrence, with most improvements occurring from the 2010s onward. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1998, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since 2015, in accordance with Obergefell v. Hodges. In addition, the state's largest city Atlanta, has a vibrant LGBTQ community and holds the biggest Pride parade in the Southeast. The state's hate crime laws, effective since June 26, 2020, explicitly include sexual orientation.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Massachusetts enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. The U.S. state of Massachusetts is one of the most LGBTQ-supportive states in the country. In 2004, it became the first U.S. state to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, and the sixth jurisdiction worldwide, after the Netherlands, Belgium, Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec.
The establishment of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Connecticut is a recent phenomenon, with most advances in LGBT rights taking place in the late 20th century and early 21st century. Connecticut was the second U.S. state to enact two major pieces of pro-LGBT legislation; the repeal of the sodomy law in 1971 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2008. State law bans unfair discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations, and both conversion therapy and the gay panic defense are outlawed in the state.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Iowa have evolved significantly in the 21st century. Iowa began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on April 27, 2009 following a ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court, making Iowa the fourth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples may also adopt, and state laws ban discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Hawaii enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1973; Hawaii being one of the first six states to legalize it. In 1993, a ruling by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court made Hawaii the first state to consider legalizing same-sex marriage. Following the approval of the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act in November 2013, same-sex couples have been allowed to marry on the islands. Additionally, Hawaii law prohibits discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, and the use of conversion therapy on minors has been banned since July 2018. Gay and lesbian couples enjoy the same rights, benefits and treatment as opposite-sex couples, including the right to marry and adopt.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Pennsylvania. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Pennsylvania was the final Mid-Atlantic state without same-sex marriage, indeed lacking any form of same-sex recognition law until its statutory ban was overturned on May 20, 2014.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arkansas face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity in Arkansas was decriminalized in 2001 and legally codified in 2005. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9, 2014, subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Nonetheless, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity was not banned in Arkansas until the Supreme Court banned it nationwide in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt. Nevertheless, the state provides only limited protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Several cities, including Phoenix and Tucson, have enacted ordinances to protect LGBTQ people from unfair discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Indiana have been shaped by both state and federal law. These evolved from harsh penalties established early in the state's history to the decriminalization of same-sex activity in 1977 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2014. Indiana was subject to an April 2017 federal court ruling that discrimination based on sexual orientation is tantamount to discrimination on account of "sex", as defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ruling establishes sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in the workplace, forbidding unfair discrimination, although Indiana state statutes do not include sexual orientation or gender identity among its categories of discrimination.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Dakota, and same-sex marriages have been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Carolina may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Carolina as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. However, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Nebraska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Nebraska, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. The state prohibits discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County and a subsequent decision of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. In addition, the state's largest city, Omaha, has enacted protections in public accommodations.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Idaho face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. State statutes do not address discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. A number of cities and counties provide further protections, namely in housing and public accommodations. A 2019 Public Religion Research Institute opinion poll showed that 71% of Idahoans supported anti-discrimination legislation protecting LGBTQ people, and a 2016 survey by the same pollster found majority support for same-sex marriage.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kansas have federal protections, but many face some legal challenges on the state level that are not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kansas under the US Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws that only apply to same-sex sexual acts. The state has prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations since 2020. Proposed bills restricting preferred gender identity on legal documents, bans on transgender people in women's sports, bathroom use restrictions, among other bills were vetoed numerous times by Democratic Governor Laura Kelly since 2021. However, many of Kelly's vetoes were overridden by the Republican supermajority in the Kansas legislature and became law.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Oklahoma face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Oklahoma as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws. Both same-sex marriage and adoption by same-sex couples have been permitted since October 2014. State statutes do not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal. This practice may still continue, as Oklahoma is an at-will employment state and it is still legal to fire an employee without requiring the employer to disclose any reason.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Mississippi face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. LGBT rights in Mississippi are limited in comparison to other states. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Mississippi as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. The state capital Jackson and a number of other cities provide protections in housing and public accommodations as well.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)