LGBTQ rights in Idaho

Last updated

LGBTQ rights in Idaho
Map of USA ID.svg
Status Legal since 2003
( Lawrence v. Texas )
Legislative repeal in 2022
Gender identity Case law in the state requires the state to change birth certificates for transgender people
Discrimination protections Protections in employment; some municipalities have passed further protections
Family rights
Recognition of relationships Same-sex marriage since 2014
Adoption Same-sex couples may adopt jointly

Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Idaho face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. State statutes do not address discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. [1] A number of cities and counties provide further protections, namely in housing and public accommodations. A 2019 Public Religion Research Institute opinion poll showed that 71% of Idahoans supported anti-discrimination legislation protecting LGBTQ people, and a 2016 survey by the same pollster found majority support for same-sex marriage. [2]

Contents

History

Sodomy laws were enacted during the time of the creation of the Idaho Territory in the mid-19th century. Settlement by a large number of European-American immigrants introduced Christianity to the region, resulting in negative attitudes towards homosexuality. Prior to this, several Native American tribes inhabited the area. These people groups had perceptions of gender and sexuality different from that of the Western world. For instance, the Kootenai people recognize individuals who act, behave and perform tasks typically associated with the opposite gender. The kupatke'tek are male-bodied individuals who act as women, while the titqattek are female-bodied individuals who act as men and would become skilled hunters and warriors. In stories, they were regarded as supernatural beings, being able to see into the future and cure illnesses. [3] Similarly, the Coeur d'Alene people recognize the term st'amia , which refers to female-bodied individuals who live as men. There were no known legal or social punishments for engaging in homosexual activity among these tribes.

The Idaho Territory enacted a sodomy statute in 1864, punishing anal intercourse, whether heterosexual or homosexual, with five years' to life imprisonment. It was extended to include fellatio (oral sex) in 1916 in State v. Altwatter. In 1925, the state passed a sterilization law, providing for the possible forced vasectomy or salpingectomy of "habitual criminals, moral degenerates and sexual perverts". The legislation was repealed in 1972, having only been used on the "mentally retarded". The sodomy statute criminalized consensual acts as well, a point noted in numerous court cases including State v. Moore and State v. Wilson (both decided in 1956), in which two men were independently imprisoned for consensual same-sex sexual activity. [4]

Homosexuality entered increasingly more into the public eye from the 1950s onwards, especially after the Boise homosexuality scandal, at which time it was commonly regarded as a mental illness. In 1971, Idaho passed a law repealing the sodomy statute, to take effect on January 1, 1972, but following opposition by Catholic and Mormon groups, the state overturned the new law and reinstated the original law on April 1, 1972. Starting in the late 20th century and into the 21st century, acceptance and tolerance of LGBTQ people grew significantly. Consensual sodomy would remain illegal in Idaho for married heterosexual couples until 1995 (State v. Holden) and for same-sex couples and unmarried heterosexual couples until 2003 (Lawrence v. Texas). [4]

Laws regarding same-sex sexual activity

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas rendered laws banning consensual sexual activity unenforceable, including Idaho's. [5]

In September 2020, an Idaho man, who was forced to register as a sex offender after having had consensual oral sex with his wife 20 years prior in another state, filed suit against the state. [6] [7]

In April 2021 a Montana man appealed a sex offender registration requirement for violating Idaho's crimes against nature law in 1993 with two 16-year-old males when he was 18 at Pratt ranch in Gem County, he had served a lengthy 7-year prison term in Idaho before having to register as a sex offender for the consensual sex with the two males. [8] Heterosexual sex between a 16 year old and an 18 year old is legal in Idaho as long as it does not violate the crime against nature statute which bans same sex activity generally. [9]

In March 2022, the Idaho Legislature passed a bill to formally repeal the "reinstalled" 1972 sodomy law from the Idaho code. The Governor of Idaho signed the bill into law - effective from July 1. [10] [11]

Recognition of same-sex relationships

Boise Pride 2011 at the Idaho State Capitol StatehouseBoisePride2011.jpg
Boise Pride 2011 at the Idaho State Capitol

Idaho voters adopted a constitutional amendment in November 2006 stating that "A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state." [12] Similar restrictions had been incorporated in the state's statutes in the 1990s. [13] A ruling in the case of Latta v. Otter on May 13, 2014, found these prohibitions unconstitutional. Enforcement of the ruling in that case had been stayed while the case was appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [14]

On October 7, 2014, the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court ruling that found the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional. [15] State officials failed to receive a stay from the U.S. Supreme Court while they pursued further appeals, and Idaho Governor Butch Otter announced the state would no longer attempt to preserve its denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples. [16] On October 15, 2014, approximately 100 same-sex couples obtained marriage licenses at the Ada County clerk's offices. [17]

Adoption and parenting

Idaho permits adoption by "any adult person". There are no explicit prohibitions on adoption by same-sex couples or on second-parent adoptions. On February 11, 2014, the Idaho Supreme Court unanimously overturned a lower court ruling and held that an adoptive parent need not be married. It returned to the lower court the adoption petition of an Idaho woman who had married another woman in California and sought to adopt her wife's two teenage sons. [18]

Lesbian couples can access assisted reproduction services, such as in vitro fertilization. State law recognizes the non-genetic, non-gestational mother as a legal parent to a child born via donor insemination, but only if the parents are married. [19]

Idaho law does not regulate the practice of surrogacy. State courts have generally been favorable to couples, same-sex or opposite-sex, who have used the gestational or traditional surrogacy process. [20]

Discrimination protections

Map of Idaho counties and cities that had sexual orientation and/or gender identity anti-employment discrimination ordinances prior to Bostock
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Sexual orientation and gender identity with anti-employment discrimination ordinance
Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment
Sexual orientation in public employment
Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment Idaho counties and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg
Map of Idaho counties and cities that had sexual orientation and/or gender identity anti–employment discrimination ordinances prior to Bostock
  Sexual orientation and gender identity with anti–employment discrimination ordinance
  Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment
  Sexual orientation in public employment
  Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment

Local laws

The following Idaho counties and cities have ordinances prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (representing about 40% of the state population): [21] Ada County, [22] [23] Bellevue, [24] Boise, [25] Coeur d'Alene, [25] Driggs, [26] Hailey, [27] Idaho Falls, [28] [29] Ketchum, [25] Lewiston, [30] [31] Meridian, [32] [33] Moscow, [34] Pocatello, [35] Sandpoint, [25] and Victor. [36] The city of Twin Falls has an ordinance prohibiting city employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation only. [30] Latah County bans discrimination against county employees on account of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

On May 20, 2014, the voters of Pocatello, by a 50.41% to 49.59% vote, rejected Proposition 1, an initiative that would have repealed the city's ordinance that prohibits discrimination with regard to housing, employment and public accommodations based on a person's sexual orientation or gender identity and gender expression. [37]

State laws

No provision of Idaho law explicitly addresses discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [38]

On November 8, 1994, the voters of Idaho, by a 50.38% to 49.62% vote, rejected Initiative 1, an initiative that would have forbid state and local governments from granting minority status and rights based on homosexual behavior. [39]

On February 10, 2012, the Senate State Affairs Committee, by a 7–2 vote, rejected a bill that would have banned discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in jobs, housing, educational opportunities and public accommodations. [40]

In April 2014, a series of protests collectively known as Add The Words, Idaho resulted in numerous arrests. [41] [42]

In 2015, a bill to add sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination language made some progress, after having been denied a hearing in each of the preceding nine years. On January 15, 2015, the House Ways and Means Committee voted 6–1 to hold a hearing, [43] but on January 29, the House State Affairs Committee voted 13–4 against the bill. [44]

In January 2021, a similar nondiscrimination bill was again introduced to the Idaho Legislature. [45]

Bostock v. Clayton County

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidated with Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda , and in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that discrimination in the workplace on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is discrimination on the basis of sex, and Title VII therefore protects LGBT employees from discrimination. [46] [47] [48]

Hate crime law

Idaho law does not address hate crimes based on gender identity or sexual orientation. [49] However, since the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was signed into law in October 2009, U.S. federal law has addressed crimes motivated by the victim's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. Hate crimes against LGBTQ people can be prosecuted in federal court. [50]

Transgender rights

In September 2024, transgender prisoners within Idaho are permitted to have hormone therapy - under a court ruling by a federal judge. The archaic 1997 law banning hormone therapy on prisoners is nullified and void. [51]

In August 2024, the Idaho Governor signed an executive order on banning any/all federal laws, regulations and guidelines regarding gender identity/ideology from applying within Idaho’s state borders. [52]

In April 2024, the US Supreme Court upheld the ban on puberty blockers, gender-affirming healthcare and sexual reassignment surgery on children and minors (that overturned a lower court decision) - the Idaho law was passed, signed and implemented back in 2020. [53]

Banning student pronouns not based on birth certificate within schools and classrooms

In April 2024, the Governor of Idaho signed a bill into law banning usage of pronouns which are not based on birth certificate - on students and pupils - by teachers and education agencies within schools and classrooms. [54]

2024 bills

In February 2024, a bill passed the Idaho House of Representatives to "exclusively recognise male and female, not others" - throughout the Idaho Code only. The bill is pending within the Idaho Senate. [55]

Identity documents

From April 6, 2018, onwards, transgender people in Idaho were allowed to change their birth certificate to accurately reflect their gender identity. The ruling was labelled "a huge win" by transgender activists, who in 2017 had filed a lawsuit challenging the state law. While arguing that transgender people "already face disproportionately high levels of discrimination", the judge asserted that such discrepancies "can create risks to the health and safety of transgender people" and that said discrepancies were "archaic, unjust and discriminatory". [56] [19] On March 30, 2020, Governor Brad Little, attempting to overturn the court ruling, signed legislation (HB 509) barring transgender individuals from changing the sex marker on their birth certificate and prohibiting transgender athletes from competing in sports teams in public school and university settings. [57]

The law went into preliminary effect on July 1, 2020, but arguments against it were heard in court on July 22, 2020. [58] On August 7, 2020, before it took permanent effect, District Court Judge David C. Nye said it was moot and unenforceable. The state planned to appeal. [59] In June 2022, the court awarded attorneys' fees to the winning side, [60] and in August 2022, the Idaho Board of Examiners approved the amount of $321,000. It will be paid with taxpayer funds to the civil rights group Lambda Legal. [61]

Since March 2019, Idaho allows for a third gender option (known as "X") on driver's licenses and state ID cards. [62] [63] The outcome of the August 7, 2020 ruling is that anyone applying to change gender markers on driver's licenses and state IDs must submit to the Idaho Department of Transportation a letter from a physician certifying that sex reassignment surgery has been performed. [64] [65]

In November 2019, the Idaho Board of Health and Welfare abolished a rule that required a doctor's approval for a gender change for transgender minors but retained parental permission, the minor being emancipated, or a court order. [66]

Gender-affirming care

On April 4, 2023, Governor Brad Little signed HB 71, [67] banning puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries for minors and making it a felony for any doctor to help a child seek gender-affirming care. [68] [69] The previous month had also seen legislation governing pronouns in schools and bathroom use in all public places. [70] [71] [72]

Previously, in March 2022, HB 675 had passed the Idaho House of Representatives. The bill would have made it a felony to provide gender-affirming medical care to transgender youth, and parents who brought their children out-of-state to receive it would have faced life in prison. The Idaho Senate blocked the bill, citing parents rights' and government overreach. [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78]

Public opinion

Recent opinion polls have shown that support for LGBTQ people across the U.S. state of Idaho is increasing and opposition is decreasing.

A 2017 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) opinion poll found that 56% of Idaho residents supported same-sex marriage, while 32% opposed it and 13% were unsure. [2] The same poll found that 68% of Idahoans supported an anti-discrimination law covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 24% were opposed. [79] Furthermore, 51% were against allowing public businesses to refuse to serve LGBTQ people due to religious beliefs, while 40% supported allowing such religiously based refusals. [80]

A 2022 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) poll found that 64% of Idaho residents supported same-sex marriage, while 36% opposed. Additionally, 80% of Idaho residents supported discrimination protections covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 19% were opposed. [81]


Public opinion for LGBTQ anti-discrimination laws in Idaho
Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
 % support % opposition % no opinion
Public Religion Research Institute January 2-December 30, 2019 381 ?71%23%6%
Public Religion Research Institute January 3-December 30, 2018 359 ?68%25%7%
Public Religion Research Institute April 5-December 23, 2017 461 ?68%24%8%
Public Religion Research Institute April 29, 2015-January 7, 2016 471 ?70%25%5%

Summary table

Same-sex sexual activity legal Yes check.svg (Since 2003; codified 2022) [10] [82]
Equal age of consent (16) Yes check.svg
Anti-discrimination laws in employment Yes check.svg (Since 2020)
Anti-discrimination laws in housing X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (In some cities and counties only)
Anti-discrimination laws in public accommodations X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (In some cities and counties only)
Anti-discrimination laws in schools and colleges X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (In some cities and counties only)
Same-sex marriages Yes check.svg / X mark.svg (Since 2014; banned in the Nez Perce Reservation since 2019) [83]
Joint and stepchild adoption by same-sex couples Yes check.svg
Lesbian, gay and bisexual people allowed to serve openly in the military Yes check.svg (Since 2011)
Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military Yes check.svg (Since 2021) [84]
Intersex people allowed to serve openly in the military X mark.svg (Current DoD policy bans "hermaphrodites" from serving or enlisting in the military) [85]
Transgender athletes allowed to participate in sports X mark.svg (Since 2020; enforcement currently stayed by federal judge)
Third gender option X mark.svg / Yes check.svg (Not available for birth certificates, but available for driver's licenses and state IDs)
Conversion therapy banned on minors X mark.svg
Gay panic defense abolished X mark.svg
Right to change legal gender on driver's licenses and state ID cards Yes check.svg
Right to change legal gender on birth certificates X mark.svg (Since 2020; enforcement currently stayed by federal judge)
Equal access to IVF for lesbian couples Yes check.svg
Surrogacy arrangements legal for gay male couples Yes check.svg
MSMs allowed to donate blood Yes check.svg [86]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wyoming</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wyoming may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Wyoming since 1977, and same-sex marriage was legalized in the state in October 2014. Wyoming statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, the cities of Jackson, Casper, and Laramie have enacted ordinances outlawing discrimination in housing and public accommodations that cover sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Louisiana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Louisiana may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Louisiana as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized in the state since June 2015 as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Michigan</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Michigan enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Michigan in June 2024 was ranked "the most welcoming U.S. state for LGBT individuals". Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan under the U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage was legalised in accordance with 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity is unlawful since July 2022, was re-affirmed by the Michigan Supreme Court - under and by a 1976 statewide law, that explicitly bans discrimination "on the basis of sex". The Michigan Civil Rights Commission have also ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law since 2018 and also legally upheld by the Michigan Supreme Court in 2022. In March 2023, a bill passed the Michigan Legislature by a majority vote - to formally codify both "sexual orientation and gender identity" anti-discrimination protections embedded within Michigan legislation. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed the bill on March 16, 2023. In 2024, Michigan repealed “the last ban on commercial surrogacy within the US” - for individuals and couples and reformed the parentage laws, that acknowledges same sex couples and their families with children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in West Virginia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of West Virginia face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT persons. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1976, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since October 2014. West Virginia statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Minnesota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Minnesota have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. Minnesota became the first U.S. state to outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in 1993, protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination in the fields of employment, housing, and public accommodations. In 2013, the state legalized same-sex marriage, after a bill allowing such marriages was passed by the Minnesota Legislature and subsequently signed into law by Governor Mark Dayton. This followed a 2012 ballot measure in which voters rejected constitutionally banning same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Connecticut</span>

The establishment of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Connecticut is a recent phenomenon, with most advances in LGBT rights taking place in the late 20th century and early 21st century. Connecticut was the second U.S. state to enact two major pieces of pro-LGBT legislation; the repeal of the sodomy law in 1971 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2008. State law bans unfair discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations, and both conversion therapy and the gay panic defense are outlawed in the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Iowa</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Iowa have evolved significantly in the 21st century. Iowa began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on April 27, 2009 following a ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court, making Iowa the fourth U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples may also adopt, and state laws ban discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Hawaii</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Hawaii enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1973; Hawaii being one of the first six states to legalize it. In 1993, a ruling by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court made Hawaii the first state to consider legalizing same-sex marriage. Following the approval of the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act in November 2013, same-sex couples have been allowed to marry on the islands. Additionally, Hawaii law prohibits discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, and the use of conversion therapy on minors has been banned since July 2018. Gay and lesbian couples enjoy the same rights, benefits and treatment as opposite-sex couples, including the right to marry and adopt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wisconsin</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wisconsin enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. However, the transgender community may face some legal issues not experienced by cisgender residents, due in part to discrimination based on gender identity not being included in Wisconsin's anti-discrimination laws, nor is it covered in the state's hate crime law. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Wisconsin since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Wolf v. Walker. Discrimination based on sexual orientation is banned statewide in Wisconsin, and sexual orientation is a protected class in the state's hate crime laws. It approved such protections in 1982, making it the first state in the United States to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Pennsylvania</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Pennsylvania. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Pennsylvania was the final Mid-Atlantic state without same-sex marriage, indeed lacking any form of same-sex recognition law until its statutory ban was overturned on May 20, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arkansas</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arkansas face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arkansas. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9, 2014, subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Nonetheless, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity was not banned in Arkansas until the Supreme Court banned it nationwide in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Arizona</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt. Nevertheless, the state provides only limited protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Several cities, including Phoenix and Tucson, have enacted ordinances to protect LGBTQ people from unfair discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Indiana</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Indiana have been shaped by both state and federal law. These evolved from harsh penalties established early in the state's history to the decriminalization of same-sex activity in 1977 and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2014. Indiana was subject to an April 2017 federal court ruling that discrimination based on sexual orientation is tantamount to discrimination on account of "sex", as defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The ruling establishes sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in the workplace, forbidding unfair discrimination, although Indiana state statutes do not include sexual orientation or gender identity among its categories of discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in South Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Dakota, and same-sex marriages have been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Nebraska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Nebraska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Nebraska, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. The state prohibits discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County and a subsequent decision of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. In addition, the state's largest city, Omaha, has enacted protections in public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kentucky</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity in Kentucky has been legally permitted since 1992, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is legal in Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and all other same-sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kansas</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kansas have federal protections, but many face some legal challenges on the state level that are not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kansas under the US Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws that only apply to same-sex sexual acts. The state has prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing and public accommodations since 2020. Proposed bills restricting preferred gender identity on legal documents, bans on transgender people in women's sports, bathroom use restrictions, among other bills were vetoed numerous times by Democratic Governor Laura Kelly since 2021. However, many of Kelly's vetoes were overridden by the Republican supermajority in the Kansas legislature and became law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Alaska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Alaska have evolved significantly over the years. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBTQ people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Oklahoma</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Oklahoma face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Oklahoma as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws. Both same-sex marriage and adoption by same-sex couples have been permitted since October 2014. State statutes do not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal. This practice may still continue, as Oklahoma is an at-will employment state and it is still legal to fire an employee without requiring the employer to disclose any reason.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Mississippi</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Mississippi face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. LGBT rights in Mississippi are limited in comparison to other states. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Mississippi as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. The state capital Jackson and a number of other cities provide protections in housing and public accommodations as well.

References

  1. 31,800 LGBT People in Idaho Lack Statewide Protections from Ongoing Discrimination, The Williams Institute
  2. 1 2 "PRRI – American Values Atlas". ava.prri.org.
  3. Haggerty, George; Zimmerman, Bonnie (2003). Encyclopedia of Lesbian and Gay Histories and Cultures. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   1135578702.
  4. 1 2 "The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Idaho". www.glapn.org.
  5. New York Times: "Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Law Banning Sodomy," June 26, 2003, access April 14, 2011
  6. "A man in Idaho is suing the state over its anti-sodomy law". Gay Star News. September 25, 2020. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  7. Duffy, Nick (September 29, 2020). "Man forced ro register as a sex offender for consensual sex. Now he's fighting to strike down archaic sodomy law". PinkNews.
  8. "Sodomy laws that labeled gay people sex offenders challenged in court". NBC News .
  9. "Title 18 – Idaho State Legislature".
  10. 1 2 "SENATE BILL 1325 – Idaho State Legislature".
  11. "Idaho S1325 | 2022 | Regular Session".
  12. CNN: 2006 Key Ballot Measures, accessed April 14, 2011; Idaho State Legislature: Article III, Section 28 Archived 2010-08-02 at the Wayback Machine , accessed January 6, 2007
  13. Human Resources Campaign: Idaho Marriage/Relationship Recognition Law Archived 2012-07-25 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 14, 2011
  14. Geidner, Chris (May 15, 2014). "No Friday Same-Sex Marriages In Idaho". BuzzFeed . Retrieved August 20, 2014.
  15. "Equality on Trial". October 7, 2014.
  16. Sewell, Cynthia (October 10, 2014). "Otter says state should comply with gay-marriage order when it comes again". Idaho Statesman. Retrieved October 10, 2014.
  17. Kreusi, Kimberlee; Ridler, Keith (October 15, 2014). "Gay marriage arrives in conservative stronghold Idaho". ABC News. Associated Press. Retrieved October 16, 2014.
  18. Zuckerman, Laura (February 11, 2014). "Idaho's top court grants adoptive rights to spouse in gay marriage". Reuters. Retrieved February 11, 2014.
  19. 1 2 "Idaho's equality profile". Movement Advancement Project.
  20. "What You Need to Know About Surrogacy in Idaho". American Surrogacy.
  21. "Idaho's Equality Profile". Movement Advancement project.
  22. Inglet, Misty (February 12, 2020). "Ada County adopts non-discrimination ordinance: 'a clear message of inclusivity and tolerance'". KTVB.com.
  23. White, Madeline (February 12, 2020). "Ada County Commissioners unanimously vote to 'Add the Words'". KIVI Boise.
  24. Evans, Tony (June 17, 2015). "Bellevue passes LGBT ordinance". The Idaho Mountain Express.
  25. 1 2 3 4 "Cities and Counties with Non-Discrimination Ordinances that Include Gender Identity". Human Rights Campaign . Retrieved May 25, 2013.
  26. "Driggs passes non-discrimination ordinance".
  27. Brown, Nathan (May 26, 2015). "First Twin Falls Gay Couple to Get Marriage License Celebrates their Commitment" . Retrieved June 17, 2015.
  28. Russell, Betsy (September 13, 2013). "Idaho Falls bans housing, employment discrimination against gays". The Spokesman-Review . Retrieved September 18, 2013. Idaho Falls has become the seventh city in Idaho to enact a local ordinance barring discrimination in housing and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
  29. "City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, Code of Ordinances". idahofallsidaho.gov.
  30. 1 2 Baeza, Benito (January 16, 2013). "Lewiston Adds Sexual Orientation to City Policy". KLIX. Associated Press . Retrieved January 19, 2013.
  31. "Lewiston, Idaho Passes LGBT Non-Discrimination Ordinance". Towleroad. October 28, 2014.
  32. "Meridian passes anti-discrimination ordinance". KIVI. September 26, 2018.
  33. "Municipal Equality Index" (PDF). Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2013.
  34. "Fourth Idaho city passes LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination ordinance". LGBTQ Nation. April 2, 2013.
  35. "Pocatello Adopts Anti-discrimination Rule, Becoming 6th Idaho City to Protect GLBT People". Times-News. Associated Press. June 7, 2013. Retrieved July 23, 2013.
  36. Saunders, Emilie Ritter (12 June 2014). "Rural Border Town Becomes Idaho's 8th City To Approve Non-Discrimination Ordinance". www.boisestatepublicradio.org.
  37. "UNOFFICIAL RESULTS". Archived from the original on 2014-06-06. Retrieved 2014-06-06.
  38. Human Resources Campaign: Idaho Non-Discrimination Law Archived 2012-04-30 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 14, 2011
  39. "IDSOS Idaho Initiative History". sos.idaho.gov.
  40. "Idaho GOP refuses to 'add the words' to prohibit LGBT discrimination". LGBTQ Nation. February 12, 2012.
  41. "Dozens more arrested in 'Add the Words' protest at Boise Capitol | The Spokesman-Review". www.spokesman.com.
  42. "addthewordsidaho". addthewordsidaho.
  43. Kruesi, Kimberlee (January 15, 2015). "In reversal, Idaho lawmakers introduce sex orientation and gender identity protection bill". Daily Journal (Idaho). Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 18, 2015. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
  44. "'Add the Words' bill dies in committee". KTVB. January 29, 2015. Archived from the original on January 31, 2015. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
  45. Holmes, Brian (January 25, 2021). "Idaho lawmakers introduce Add the Words legislation for the 15th time". KTVB.com. Boise.
  46. Biskupic, Joan (June 16, 2020). "Two conservative justices joined decision expanding LGBTQ rights". CNN.
  47. "US Supreme Court backs protection for LGBT workers". BBC News. June 15, 2020.
  48. Liptak, Adam (June 15, 2020). "Civil Rights Law Protects Gay and Transgender Workers, Supreme Court Rules". The New York Times.
  49. Human Resources Campaign: Idaho Hate Crimes Law Archived 2012-07-25 at the Wayback Machine , accessed April 14, 2011
  50. Crimes of the Ignorant, 18inidaho.org
  51. Mosbergen, Dominique (March 7, 2018). "Idaho Transgender Community Celebrates Victory In Birth Certificate Ruling". HuffPost.
  52. Sewell, Cynthia (30 March 2020). "Idaho governor signs GOP's anti-transgender bills, setting up likely legal challenges". Idaho Statesman.
  53. Dawson, James (July 23, 2020). "Federal Court Weights Challenges To Two Idaho Laws Targeting Transgender Rights". Boise State Public Radio.
  54. "Anti-transgender birth certificate law violates order, judge rules". NBC News. August 11, 2020. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  55. Suppe, Ryan (16 August 2022). "Idaho taxpayers will pay for 'unconstitutional' anti-trans law. Here's the cost". Idaho Statesman. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  56. Ridler, Keith (2022-08-16). "Idaho Leaders Must Pay $321K In Transgender-Birth Certificate Case". HuffPost. Retrieved 2022-08-16.
  57. "Gender Neutral ID's and Driver's Licenses". KPVI. March 26, 2019.
  58. "Gender-neutral IDs available to Idahoans". LocalNews8. Archived from the original on 2019-03-27. Retrieved 2019-03-27.
  59. Holcombe, Madeline (August 18, 2020). "Federal judge says Idaho cannot ban transgender athletes from women's sports teams". CNN.
  60. Ridler, Keith (September 17, 2020). "Group appeals US judge's Idaho transgender sports ban ruling". Associated Press.
  61. Russell, Betsy (15 November 2019). "Idaho Cuts Rule Requiring Teens Get Doctor Approval For Birth Certificate Gender Change". KTVB.com.
  62. "HOUSE BILL 71 – Idaho State Legislature" . Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  63. Maldonado, Mia (2023-03-27). "Idaho bill to ban gender care for trans youth clears Senate, heads back to House". Idaho Capital Sun. Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  64. Bollinger, Alex. "Idaho passes law letting students sue for "emotional harm" if they see a trans kid in the restroom". LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  65. "Human Rights Campaign Slams Idaho Gov. Little for Signing Slate of Bills Rolling Back LGBTQ+ Equality". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved 2023-04-05.
  66. Browning, Bil. "Idaho passes bill that would send loving parents of trans kids to prison for life". LGBTQ Nation. Retrieved 2022-03-12.
  67. "Idaho bill would make medical treatment for trans youth punishable by life in prison". www.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2022-03-12.
  68. "Idaho Senate halts healthcare bill targeting trans youth". MSN. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  69. "Idaho House Passes Discriminatory Bill to Criminalize Gender Affirming Care for Transgender Youth". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
  70. Ridler, Keith (2022-03-16). "Idaho Senate kills bill on gender confirmation surgery for minors". ktvb.com. Retrieved 2022-03-16.
  71. Wilson, Reid (2022-03-16). "Idaho Senate Republicans kill bill banning trans medical care". The Hill. Retrieved 2022-03-16.
  72. "PRRI – American Values Atlas". ava.prri.org.
  73. "PRRI – American Values Atlas". ava.prri.org.
  74. "PRRI – American Values Atlas". ava.prri.org.
  75. "A man in Idaho is suing the state over its anti-sodomy law". 25 September 2020. Archived from the original on 24 October 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  76. "Title 1-General Provisions, Nez Perce Tribal Code" (PDF). nezperce.org/resources/tribal-code/. Retrieved 22 Feb 2019.
  77. Baldor, Lolita; Miller, Zeke (January 25, 2021). "Biden reverses Trump ban on transgender people in military". Associated Press.
  78. "Medical Conditions That Can Keep You From Joining the Military". Military.com. 25 February 2022.