Lily Thomas | |
---|---|
Born | 5 March 1928 [3] |
Died | 10 December 2019 91) Delhi, India | (aged
Nationality | Indian |
Education | |
Alma mater | University of Madras |
Occupation | Lawyer |
Known for | Co-petitioner in Representation of the People Act, 1951 case |
Parents |
|
Lily Isabel Thomas (5 March 1928 – 10 December 2019) [4] was an Indian lawyer who initiated improvement and change to existing laws by filing petitions in India's apex court, the Supreme Court of India and regional courts. [5] [6] Her petitions resulted in changes to laws to prevent convicted politicians getting elected, [7] the addition of a new marriage law [8] and protections for parliamentarians. [9] She was hailed most notably for petitioning to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951. [10] [11]
Lily hailed from Kottayam and grew up in Thiruvananthapuram. She had joined Madras High Court in 1955, [12] under which she studied the LL.M. course which was completed in 1959. [13] Lily belongs to the first generation of women lawyers in India and she was the first woman to complete the LL.M. course from the University of Madras. [14]
After obtaining a law degree from Madras University, she started her practice in the Madras High Court. She was the first lady in India to qualify for an LL.M. degree. [15] In 1960, she moved to Delhi to do a Ph.D. but discovered that she was not really cut out for academia. "I realised that I was not competent to do research," she admitted, "so I started practising in the Supreme Court". [15]
Lily was once senior most woman lawyer in the Supreme Court of India, when she had joined it in 1960. [16]
Lily Thomas had joined the Supreme Court of India in 1960. [13] She dropped out of doctorate in law after coming to Delhi and started working where her brother John Thomas was already practising. [14] Lily filed petitions since 1964 on different issues such as the validity of 'Advocate-on-Record Examination', [14] sorting out issues of railway employees and case on conversion to Islam for the express purpose of entering into a second marriage in 2000. [12] [13] Thomas worked on constitutional law, women's rights and issues of personal liberty. [17] Lily was an advocate in OLD LAWYERS CHAMBERS BLOCKS. [18]
Lily was first known for petitioning in 1952 in the Supreme Court to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951 in order to get declared Section 8(4) of the act as unconstitutional, eventually which was rejected by the Court then. [16]
In 2013, at the age of 85, she won a landmark judgement under which members of India's Parliament and members of state legislative bodies, convicted of a crime or in jail, became ineligible to run for elections or hold an elected seat. Prior to this judgment, members of Parliament who were convicted but had filed an appeal could go about their regular business, including being elected and holding seats.
Lily Thomas, along with Adv. Satya Narain Shukla had filed a Writ petition in the apex court in 2005, challenging a provision of the Representation of the People Act which protects convicted lawmakers against disqualification on the grounds of pendency of appeal against their conviction in the higher courts. On 10 July 2013, a bench of justices A. K. Patnaik and S. J. Mukhopadhaya held that, "The only question is about the vires of section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 and we hold that it is ultra vires and that the disqualification takes place from the date of conviction." [19]
Lily was one of the first lawyers to file a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the validity of the 'Advocate on Record' system on 14 January 1964. [13] [20] Under this system, only those advocates who have passed the AOR exam are eligible to file petitions. [21] Lily believed that 'Section 30' under Part IV of the Advocates Act, 1961 mentions that all advocates have the right to practise in all courts including the Supreme Court in India and no restriction should be imposed for passing an exam and 'Section 16' differentiates lawyers into Advocates and Senior Advocates. [11] The issue of AOR was challenged and debated multiple times, [22] [23] [24] on 16 October 2015 the Supreme Court struck down NJAC meant to replace the AOR, as unconstitutional and upheld the collegium system. [25]
Lily had filed the petition in the Supreme Court on status of the earlier marriage regarding a case when a non-Muslim gets converted to the 'Muslim' faith without any real change or belief without divorcing first wife. [26] The Court after hearing similar petitions declared the practice of remarrying as null and void unless the first marriage is dissolved. [27] The Law Commission sent the recommendation to the Law Ministry amending Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to stop the illegal practice. [28] [29]
Lily along with Lucknow-based NGO Lok Prahari [30] were the petitioners in the case when the Supreme Court had struck down Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 to disqualify a legislator immediately when convicted for two or more years' prison. [31] [32] [33] When the UPA government had prepared an ordinance to nullify the judgment, [34] [35] Lily made a review petition against the ordinance, the government had later withdrawn the ordinance route after severe criticism. [36] [37] She had got help from other experts, including Fali Sam Nariman in the case. [12] Lily's petition was accepted the third time after successive rejections. [13] The law had far reaching effect when influential politicians such as then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, [12] [38] [39] Rasheed Masood [40] and Lalu Prasad were disqualified. [41] Another disqualification case of sitting M.P. Rahul Gandhi in Mar 2023 was seen due to the same act applied. [42] [43]
The judgements were largely seen to cleanse politics from criminalization. [44]
Lily believed it is the responsibility of the lawyers to fight through petitions to improve the existing laws [49] and having criminals as politicians is an insult to the parliamentary system. [50] Lily had considered her father who was also an advocate, her hero. At an old age, she went to the court every day and worked for 8–10 hours. Lily preferred reading Mills & Boon and having knowledge of Bible and Vishnu Sahasranama . [12] She was a practising Syrian Christian. [51]
Lily remained unmarried. [52]
On 10 December 2019, Lily Thomas had passed away at the age of 91 in Delhi at a private hospital. [16] [53]
Adv. Saju Jakob is carrying forward the legacy of Adv. Lily Thomas through his law office namely Office of Lily Thomas and Saju Jakob, which has already conducted various Lily Thomas Memorial Lectures and Essay Writing Competitions. [3]
On 12 December 2022, the Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association including the office of Lily Thomas & Saju Jakob had organised a memorial in memory of Lily.
The event was being attended by judges M. R. Shah and C. T. Ravikumar. The then Attorney General for India R. Venkataramani was the notable speaker for the memorial meeting. Other important attendes were advocate Pravin H. Parekh who is the president of ISIL & Confederation of Indian Bar, and advocate Pradeep Rai, vice-president of SCBA. [53]
Yakub Abdul Razzaq Memon was an Indian terrorist convicted of terrorism over his financial involvements in the 1993 Bombay bombings, and the brother of one of the prime suspects in the bombings, Tiger Memon. After his appeals and petitions for clemency were all rejected, he was executed at Nagpur Central Jail on 30 July 2015. Memon financially assisted his brother Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim in planning and executing the bombings. Memon handled Tiger's funds, funded the training of 15 youths who were sent to a secret location to learn handling arms and ammunition, purchased the vehicles used in the bombings, and stockpiled weapons.
Jagdish Sharan Verma was an Indian jurist who served as the 27th Chief Justice of India from 25 March 1997 to 18 January 1998. He was the chairman of the National Human Rights Commission from 1999 to 2003, and chairman of the Justice Verma Committee Report on Amendments to Criminal Law after the 2012 Delhi gang rape case. He remains one of India's most highly regarded Chief Justices and eminent jurists in its history.
Ananga Kumar Patnaik is an Indian jurist and a former judge of the Supreme Court of India.
Colin Gonsalves is a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India and the founder of Human Rights Law Network (HRLN). He specializes in human rights protection, labour law and public interest law. He has been awarded Right Livelihood Award for the year 2017 for "his tireless and innovative use of public interest litigation over three decades to secure fundamental human rights for India’s most marginalised and vulnerable citizens." Considered a pioneer in the field of public interest litigation in India, he has brought several cases dealing with economic, social and cultural rights. Most of these cases, decided by the Supreme Court, have been set as precedents.
Anand Grover is a senior lawyer known for legal activism in Indian law relating to homosexuality and HIV. Along with his wife Indira Jaising, he is a founder-member of the Lawyers Collective. He was the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to health from August 2008 to July 2014. He is currently and acting member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy.
Qazi Faez Isa is a Pakistani jurist who is currently serving as the 29th Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) since 17 September 2023. He was appointed as a justice of the Supreme Court in 2014, having previously served as the chief justice of Balochistan High Court from 2009 to 2014.
Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph is a former judge of Supreme Court of India; he retired on 16 June 2023. He is former chief justice of Uttarakhand High Court. Before his appointment as chief justice of the High Court of Uttarakhand on 31 July 2014, he had served as a judge of Kerala High Court for more than nine years.
The Indian Judicial Collegium system, where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges ,which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases.
Mohammad Aeltemesh, also known as Aeltemesh Rein, was an Indian lawyer who practised before the Supreme Court of India from 1978 until the early 2000s.
Palanisamy Sathasivam is an Indian judge who served as the 40th Chief Justice of India, holding the office from 2013 to 2014. On retirement from his judicial career, Sathasivam was appointed the 21st Governor of Kerala from 5 September 2014 to 4 September 2019. Sathasivam is the second judge from Tamil Nadu to become the CJI, after M. Patanjali Sastri. He is also the first former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to be appointed the Governor of a state. He is the first Governor of Kerala to be appointed by the Narendra Modi Government.
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 is an act of Parliament of India to provide for the conduct of election of the Houses of Parliament and to the House or Houses of the Legislature of each State, the qualifications and disqualifications for membership of those Houses, the corrupt practices and other offences at or in connection with such elections and the decision of doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with such elections. It was introduced in Parliament by law minister Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. The Act was enacted by the provisional parliament under Article 327 of Indian Constitution, before the first general election.
Supreme Court of India, in its judgement dated 10 July 2013 while disposing the Lily Thomas v. Union of India case, ruled that any Member of Parliament (MP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) or Member of the Legislative Council (MLC) who is convicted of a crime and given a minimum of two years' imprisonment, loses membership of the House with immediate effect. This is in contrast to the earlier position, wherein convicted members held on to their seats until they exhausted all judicial remedy in lower, state and supreme court of India. Further, Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, which allowed elected representatives three months to appeal their conviction, was declared unconstitutional by the bench of Justice A. K. Patnaik and Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya.
Pushpa Kapila Hingorani was an Indian lawyer who is regarded as "Mother of Public Interest Litigation" (PIL).
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya is a former justice of the Supreme Court of India. He was also chair of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal from 1 June 2016 to 14 March 2020. He previously served as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court and also served as acting Chief Justice at the Jharkhand High Court and the Madras High Court.
Special Leave Petitions in India (SLP) holds a prime place in the Judiciary of India, and has been provided as a "residual power" in the hands of Supreme Court of India to be exercised only in cases when any substantial question of law is involved, or gross injustice has been done. So It provides the aggrieved party a special permission to be heard in Apex court in appeal against any judgment or order of any Court/tribunal in the territory of India
Jayaram Jayalalithaa, commonly referred to as Jayalalithaa, was an Indian politician who was the six time Chief Minister of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. She was initially convicted for misusing her office during her tenure of 1991–96. Subramanian Swamy was the chief petitioner. Some of the allegations involved spending on her foster son's lavish marriage in 1996 and her acquisition of properties worth more than ₹66.65 crore, as well as jewellery, cash deposits, investments and a fleet of luxury cars. This was the first case where a ruling chief minister had to step down on account of a court sentence. Ultimately, in May 2015, her conviction was overturned, she was acquitted of all charges, and she then died before the Supreme Court of India reviewed the case in 2017.
Subodh Markandeya is a senior Indian lawyer, author and judicial activist. He primarily practices at the Supreme Court of India, but also appears in various high courts. He has served as the standing counsel for Government of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (UPFC), Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board (U.P.S.E.B.), Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam and numerous developmental authorities. He was appointed 'amicus curiae' by the Supreme Court in the 'Tihar Jail Enquiry' (1982–85).
Aman Lekhi is a senior advocate of the Supreme Court of India and is the former Additional Solicitor General of India in the Apex Court. He is named in the list of Top 100 Legal Luminaries of India by LexisNexis in May 2016.
S. Muralidhar is an Indian Judge. He is former Chief Justice of Orissa High Court and Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and Delhi High Court.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay is a politician and lawyer at the Supreme Court of India and a leader of the Bharatiya Janta Party Delhi unit. In 2011, he quit his job to join Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement and subsequently joined the newly formed the Aam Aadmi Party of which he was one of the founding members. He is known for filing Public Interest Litigations (PILs).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)