This is a list of known applications made to the United States Congress by the state legislatures for a Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution under Article V of the Constitution which provides in pertinent part:
The Congress, ..., on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments ... which, ..., shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths thereof, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress.
A discussion on the history of this process can be found at Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution. In particular, theories as to the validity of rescission of applications may also be found there as well as in List of rescissions of Article V Convention applications. All known applications are listed here, noting if and when such an application was known to have been subsequently rescinded.
On January 6, 2015, the United States House of Representatives began the process of cataloging applications submitted to the House by the state legislatures with the adoption of a new provision in the House's parliamentary rules of procedure. Previously, all documents related to Article V Convention applications were administratively processed as memorials and only summarized in the House's portion of the Congressional Record and then referred to the House's Judiciary Committee. The Clerk of the House, on that office's webpage, has since listed some—but not all—applications and rescissions received by Congress' lower chamber since 1960. [1] As this list may so easily be subsequently removed by a mere change in House rules, references to the actual Congressional Record are preferred. In its portion of the Congressional Record, the United States Senate, by contrast, typically publishes the entire verbatim text of a state legislature's application for an Article V Convention rather than to merely summarize the application's content. Once published verbatim in the Record, the Senate refers such memorials to its own Judiciary Committee.
The Congressional Record prior to 1876 is available through the Library of Congress, [2] and online since 1995. [3] In 1990, Judge Bruce Van Sickle and attorney Lynn M. Boughey compiled a list from the Congressional Record of state applications for an Article V Convention in the Hamline Law Review. Photocopies of the relevant sections of the Congressional Record have are available through Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) for the gap in the electronically available Congressional Record.
In "A Lawful and Peaceful Revolution", [4] Van Sickle and Boughey define five classifications of applications:
The following is added to this list, where the original text was not recorded in the Congressional Record:
The following is also added to this list:
Van Sickle and Boughey indicate which applications have been rescinded by their state by encasing these in parentheses, and make no note of which applications have led to amendments proposed by Congress.
In the table below, the classification of rescinded applications are stricken, with the year of rescission given in parentheses and a link to the record of the rescission. Those applications which led to amendments proposed by Congress are listed in parentheses.
This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: The website foa5c.org is broken and causes hundreds of URLs in this section to suffer link rot. URLs for more recent Article V applications have been fixed, but URLs for other applications should be replaced, possibly with Wayback Machine equivalents and/or with URLs accessible from https://clerk.house.gov/SelectedMemorial.(July 2024) |
Although the table below has sortable columns, applications are initially arranged by date approved by the state legislature or by date of entry into the Congressional Record. Application classes are encased in parentheses if Congress presented an amendment on the topic given and stricken if the state legislature has subsequently rescinded its application. All descriptions with six or more states have identical amendment text, unless specified. As of February 2024, only the Hawaii State Legislature has never approved an Article V convention application through both its upper chamber and its lower chamber during the same legislative session.
State | Issue / Topic | Date of approval by state's legislature | Receipt by Congress | Application classification (or year of application's rescission) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Virginia | Bill of Rights | November 14, 1788 | AC V.1 258-259 | |
New York | Bill of Rights | February 5, 1789 | AC V.1 282 Text | (II) |
Georgia | Clarify Amendment X | December 12, 1832 | J HR V22.2 270-271 | |
South Carolina | Clarify Amendment X | December 19, 1832 | J HR V22.2 219-220 | |
Alabama | Limitation on Tariffs | January 12, 1833 | J HR V22.2 361-362 | II |
Indiana | General and Unlimited Article V Convention | March 13, 1861? | CG V.37.S 1465-6 | I |
Ohio | General and Unlimited Article V Convention [5] | March 20, 1861 | 1861 Ohio Laws 181 | I |
New Jersey | Final Resolution for Slavery | February 1, 1861 | CG V. 36.2 p. 681 | (II) |
Kentucky | Final Resolution for Slavery | February 5, 1861 | CG V.36.2 p. 773 | (II) |
Illinois | Final Resolution for Slavery | February 28, 1861 | CG V.36.2 p. 1270 | (??) |
Nebraska | Direct Election of Senators, Other | April 14, 1893 | 1893 Neb. Laws 466-7 | III |
Texas | General and Unlimited Article V Convention | June 5, 1899? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 33, p. 219 ("Concurrent resolution, S.C.R. No. 4") | |
Minnesota | Direct Election of Senators, Other | February 13, 1901? | CR V.34 p.2561 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Pennsylvania | Direct Election of Senators, II | February 13, 1901? | CR V.45 p.7118 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Idaho | Direct Election of President, Vice-President and Senators | February 14, 1901? | CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ] | |
Montana | Direct Election of Senators, II Direct Election of Senators, II | February 21, 1901? January 31, 1905? | CR V.35 p.208 [ dead link ] CR V.39 p.2447 [ dead link ] | |
Oregon | Direct Election of Senators, Other Direct Election of Senators, I Direct Election of Senators, Other | February 23, 1901? March 10, 1903? January 26, 1909? | CR V.35 p.117 [ dead link ] CR V.45 p.7118 [ dead link ] CR V.43 p.2025 [ dead link ] | |
Tennessee | Direct Election of Senators, II Direct Election of Senators, Other | March 27, 1901? March 14, 1905? | CR V.35 p.2344 [ dead link ] CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ] | |
Colorado | Direct Election of Senators, I | April 1, 1901? | CR V.45 p.7113 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Michigan | Direct Election of Senators, Other | April 9, 1901? | CR V.35 p.117 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Texas | Direct Election of Senators, I | April 17, 1901? | CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Arkansas | Direct Election of Senators, Other | April 25, 1901? | CR V.45 p.7113 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Kentucky | Direct Election of Senators, II | February 10, 1902? | CR V.45 p.7115 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Illinois | Direct Election of Senators, I Direct Election of Senators, Other | February 10, 1903? May 23, 1907? | CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ] CR V.42 p.164 [ dead link ] | (II) (III) |
Nevada | Direct Election of Senators, II | February 25, 1903? | CR V.37 p.24 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Utah | Direct Election of Senators, I | March 12, 1903? | CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ] | |
Washington | Direct Election of Senators, Other | March 12, 1903? | CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Nebraska | Direct Election of Senators, I | March 25, 1903? | CR V.45 p.7116-7 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Iowa | Direct Election of Senators, I | March 24, 1904? | CR V.38 p.4959 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Missouri | Direct Election of Senators, II | March 18, 1905? | CR V.40 p.1905 [ dead link ] | (III) |
South Dakota | Direct Election of Senators, Other Direct Election of Senators, I | February 2, 1907? February 9, 1909? | CR V.41 p.1907 [ dead link ] CR V.43 p.2667-2668 [ dead link ] | (III) (III) |
Delaware | Anti-Polygamy | February 11, 1907? | CR V.41 p.3011 [ dead link ] | |
Missouri | General and Unlimited Article V Convention | March 6, 1907? | CR V.45 p.7116 [ dead link ] | I |
Indiana | Direct Election of Senators, Other | March 11, 1907? | CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Iowa | Direct Election of Senators, Other | March 12, 1907? | CR V.45 p.7114-5 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Nevada | Direct Election of Senators, I | March 23, 1907? | CR V.42 p.163 [ dead link ] | (II) |
New Jersey | Direct Election of Senators, I | May 28, 1907? | CR V.42 p.164 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Louisiana | Direct Election of Senators, Other | November 25, 1907? | CR V.42 p.5906 [ dead link ] | |
Oklahoma | Direct Election of Senators, Other | January 20, 1908? | CR V.45 p.7117-8 [ dead link ] | |
South Dakota | Anti-Polygamy | February 6, 1909? | CR V.43 p.2670 [ dead link ] | III |
Kansas | Direct Election of Senators, I | March 6, 1909? | CR V.45 p.7115 [ dead link ] | (II) |
Wisconsin | Direct Election of Senators, I | May 31, 1910? | CR V.45 p.7119-20 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Washington | Anti-Polygamy | September 1, 1910? | CR V.46 p.651 [ dead link ] | III |
Montana | Direct Election of Senators, Other | January 20, 1911? | CR V.46 p.2411 [ dead link ] | |
Maine | Direct Election of Senators, Other | February 22, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 46, p. 4280 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] | (III) |
Tennessee | Anti-Polygamy | February 17, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 187 ("Senate joint resolution 43") [ dead link ] | |
Montana | Anti-Polygamy | March 1, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, pp. 98-99 ("House joint memorial 7") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 99 [ dead link ] | |
Nebraska | Anti-Polygamy | March 14, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 99 ("Joint resolution by House and Senate of Nebraska Legislature") [ dead link ] | III |
Ohio | Anti-Polygamy | March 15, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, pp. 660-661 ("House joint resolution 13") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 661 [ dead link ] | III |
Illinois | Prevent and Suppress Monopolies | May 11, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 1298 ("House joint resolution 9") [ dead link ] | III |
Wisconsin | General and Unlimited Article V Convention | June 12, 1911? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 1873 ("Joint resolution (J. Res. 15, S.)") [ dead link ] | I |
California | Direct Election of Senators, I | June 13, 1911? | CR V.47 p.2000 [ dead link ] | (??) |
Vermont | Anti-Polygamy | December 18, 1912? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 49, p. 1433 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] | III |
Illinois | Anti-Polygamy | March 12, 1913? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, pp. 120-121 (Senate joint resolution 12") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 121 [ dead link ] | III |
Oregon | Anti-Polygamy | January 20, 1913? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 49, p. 2463 ("Senate joint resolution 2") [ dead link ] | |
Wisconsin | Anti-Polygamy | March 26, 1913? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, pp. 42-43 (No number, or resolution type, is given for this resolution) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 43 [ dead link ] See, also, Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 116 [ dead link ] | III |
Missouri | Supreme Court Jurisdiction | April 15, 1913? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 2428 ("House joint and concurrent resolution 23") [ dead link ] | III |
Michigan | Anti-Polygamy | July 2, 1913? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 2290 ("House resolution No. 120") [ dead link ] | III |
South Carolina | Anti-Polygamy | February 15, 1915? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 53, p. 2442 ("Concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | Mode of Amendment, Other | January 12, 1920? | CR V.60 p.31 [ dead link ] | |
Nevada | Anti-Prohibition | December 7, 1925? | CR V.67 p.458 [ dead link ] | (??) |
Wisconsin | Direct Election of President and VP | December 7, 1925? | CR V.67 p.458 [ dead link ] | (??) |
Wisconsin | General and Unlimited Article V Convention | June 10, 1929 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 2590 ("Senate Joint Resolution 65") [ dead link ] | (??) |
Wisconsin | Article V Requirements Already Met for Convention Call | September 4, 1929? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 3369 ("Senate Joint Resolution 83") [ dead link ] | (??) |
Wisconsin | Article V Requirements Already Met for Convention Call | September 23, 1929? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 3856 ("Joint Resolution No. 83, S.") [ dead link ] | (??) |
Massachusetts | Anti-Prohibition | March 13, 1931? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 45 ("Resolutions") [ dead link ] | (III) |
New York | Anti-Prohibition | December 8, 1931? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 48 ("Assembly 4") [ dead link ] | (IV) |
Wisconsin | Anti-Prohibition | December 8, 1931? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 57 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] | (III) |
New Jersey | Anti-Prohibition | February 1, 1932? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 3299 ("Joint Resolution 1") [ dead link ] | (III) |
California | Tax on Government Securities | July 9, 1935? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 79, p. 10814 ("Senate joint resolution") [ dead link ] | III |
California | Federal Labor Laws | July 9, 1935? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 79, p. 10814 ("Senate Joint Resolution 23") [ dead link ] | III |
Oregon | General Welfare Act of 1937 ("Townsend National Recovery Plan") | February 1, 1939? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, p. 985 ("House Joint Memorial 1") [ dead link ] | |
Wyoming | Income Tax, Limit II | March 8, 1939? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, pp. 2509-2510 ("House Joint Memorial 4") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2510 [ dead link ] | |
Maryland | Income Tax, Limit II | March 27, 1939? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, p. 3320 ("House resolution") appearing to have been approved only by the Maryland House of Delegates—and NOT at all by the Maryland Senate[ dead link ] | III |
Rhode Island | Income Tax, Limit I | March 26, 1940? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 86, p. 3407 ("Resolution") [ dead link ] | III |
Iowa | Income Tax, Limit II | April 18, 1941? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, p. 3172 ("House Concurrent Resolution 15") [ dead link ] | III |
Maine | Income Tax, Limit I | April 17, 1941? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, pp. 3370-3371 ("Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3371 [ dead link ] | |
Massachusetts | Income Tax, Limit I | April 29, 1941? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, pp. 3812-3813 ("Resolutions") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3813 [ dead link ] | |
Michigan | Income Tax, Limit I | May 16, 1941? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, p. 4537 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 20") [ dead link ] | III |
Iowa | Presidential Term Limits | March 26, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 2516 ("House Concurrent Resolution 26") [ dead link ] | (III) |
Illinois | Presidential Term Limits | March 26, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 2516-2517 ("Senate Joint Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2517 [ dead link ] | (III) |
Michigan | Presidential Term Limits | April 6, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 2944 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 24") [ dead link ] | (III) |
New Hampshire | Income Tax, II | April 29, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 3761-3762 ("A concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3762 [ dead link ] | |
Delaware | Income Tax, Limit I | May 3, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 4017 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 6") [ dead link ] | |
Illinois | Income Tax, Limit II | May 26, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 742-743 (HJR 32) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 743 [ dead link ] | |
Pennsylvania | Limited Funding Mandates, Various | May 27, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 8220 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] | III |
Pennsylvania | Income Tax, Limit II | May 27, 1943? | CR V.89 pp.8220-8221 ("[House Concurrent resolution [No. 50]"][ dead link ] | III |
Alabama | Income Tax, Limit I | July 8, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 7523-7524 ("House Joint Resolution 66") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7524 [ dead link ] | III |
Wisconsin | Income Tax, Limit I | September 14, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 7524 ("Assembly Joint Resolution 55") [ dead link ] | III |
Wisconsin | Presidential Term Limits | September 14, 1943? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 7525 ("Joint Resolution No. 38, A") [ dead link ] | (III) |
Kentucky | Income Tax, Limit I | March 20, 1944? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 90, pp. 4040-4041 ("House Resolution 79") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4041 [ dead link ] | |
New Jersey | Income Tax, Limit I | February 25, 1944? | CR V.90 p.6141 [ dead link ] | |
California | World Federation | April 14, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 4568-4569 ("Assembly Joint Resolution 26") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4569 [ dead link ] | IV |
New Jersey | World Federation | April 14, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 4571 ("Assembly Concurrent Resolution 17") [ dead link ] | IV |
North Carolina | World Federation | April 20, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 6587-6588 ("Resolution 37") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6588 [ dead link ] | IV |
Michigan | Revenue Sharing, II | May 5, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 5628-5629 (HCR 26) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5629 [ dead link ] | IV |
Florida | World Federation | May 16, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 7000 ("Senate Memorial 282") [ dead link ] | |
Nebraska | Revenue Sharing, II | May 25, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 7893-7894 ("Legislative Resolution 32") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7894 [ dead link ] | |
Connecticut | World Federation | June 1, 1949? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 7689 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] | IV |
Kansas | Income Tax, Limit I | March 28, 1951? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, p. 2936 (SCR 4) [ dead link ] | III |
Iowa | Revenue Sharing, II | April 17, 1951? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 3939-3940 (SCR 11) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3940 [ dead link ] | IV |
Florida | Income Tax, Limit I | May 10, 1951? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 5155-5156 (SCR 206) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5156 [ dead link ] | |
Maine | Revenue Sharing, II | June 4, 1951? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 6033-6034 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6034 [ dead link ] | IV |
New Hampshire | Revenue Sharing, II | August 28, 1951? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 10716-10717 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10717 [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Income Tax, Limit II | February 4, 1952? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 742 (SCR 10) [ dead link ] | III |
Utah | Income Tax, Limit I | February 11, 1952? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 947 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
New Mexico | Revenue Sharing, II | February 11, 1952? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 947-948 (HJR 12) [ dead link ] p. 948 [ dead link ] | IV |
Georgia | Limited Treaty Powers, Various | January 29, 1952? | CR V.98 p.1057 [ dead link ] | |
Georgia | Income Tax, Limit I | February 6, 1952? | CR V.98 p.1057 [ dead link ] | |
Indiana | Income Tax, Limit II Income Tax, Limit II | February 18, 1952? March 12, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 1056-1057 (HCR 10) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 1057 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6474-6475 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6475 [ dead link ] | III III |
Virginia | Income Tax, Limit I | February 21, 1952? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 1496 (HJR 32) [ dead link ] | |
California | Motor Vehicle Tax Distribution | April 16, 1952? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 4003-4004 (AJR 8) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4004 [ dead link ] | III |
Louisiana | Income Tax, Limit I | January 13, 1953? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, p. 320 ("Concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 321 [ dead link ] | |
South Dakota | Mode of Amendment, Other Mode of Amendment, by 12 States Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | March 5, 1953? February 15, 1955? March 2, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, pp. 9180-9181 (SJR 4) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 9181 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 2861-2862 (SJR 5) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2862 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 14638-14639 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 14639 [ dead link ] | |
Illinois | Mode of Amendment, Other Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | June 25, 1953? March 5, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, p. 9864 (HJR 37) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3788 (SJR 4) [ dead link ] | IV III |
Georgia | School Management, States' Right School Management, States' Right School Management, States' Right | January 31, 1955? February 5, 1959? March 4, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, p. 1532 ("Resolution") [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 1834 (HR 99) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 5817 (HR 128-212) [ dead link ] | |
Texas | Mode of Amendment, by 12 States Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | March 14, 1955? April 4, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 2770-2771 (SCR 15) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2771 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 11852 (HCR 21) [ dead link ] | |
Oklahoma | Income Tax, Limit Other | May 23, 1955? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 8397-8398 (SJR 15) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8398 (referred to the Committee on Finance rather than to the Committee on the Judiciary)[ dead link ] | |
Michigan | Mode of Amendment, by 12 States | April 4, 1956? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 102, pp. 7240-7241 (HCR 8) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7241 [ dead link ] | IV |
Idaho | Mode of Amendment, by 12 States | April 1, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103 pp. 4831-4832 (HCR 6) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4832 [ dead link ] | |
Indiana | Mode of Amendment, by 12 States | March 12, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6471-6472 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6472 [ dead link ] | IV |
Indiana | Limited Treaty Powers, Various | March 12, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6472-6473 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 4") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6473 [ dead link ] | III |
Indiana | Proportional Electoral College, Other | March 12, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6473-6474 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 7") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6474 [ dead link ] | III |
Indiana | Repeal of Constitution's 16th Amendment | March 12, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6474-6475 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6475 [ dead link ] | III |
Indiana | Balanced Budget, Other Balanced Budget, Other | March 12, 1957? January 26, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6475-6476 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 9") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6476 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 931 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] | III III |
Florida | Supreme Court Review, Other | June 5, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, p. 12787 (SCR 116) [ dead link ] | |
Alabama | Judicial Term Limits | June 25, 1957? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, p. 10863 (SJR 47) [ dead link ] | III |
Connecticut | Prohibit Interstate Income Tax | May 6, 1958? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 104, pp. 8085-8086 (SJR 9) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8086 [ dead link ] | III |
Alabama | Limited Federal Preemption | January 1, 1959? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 3083 (SJR 2) [ dead link ] | III |
Wyoming | Limit Federal Powers | February 26, 1959? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, pp. 3085-3086 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3086 [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Validity of 14th Amendment | March 18, 1959? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 4398 (HCR 24) [ dead link ] | III |
Nevada | Limit Federal Powers | March 11, 1960? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 106, p. 10749 (SJR 7) [ dead link ] | III |
Louisiana | Limit Federal Powers | June 11, 1960? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 106, p. 14401 (HCR 22) [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Supreme Court Review, Other | February 2, 1961? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 2154 (HCR 14) [ dead link ] | III |
Wyoming | Balanced Budget, Other Balanced Budget, Emergency | February 21, 1961? February 8, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 2759 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 4") [ dead link ] CR V.125 p.2116 [ dead link ] | |
Georgia | Supreme Court Review, Other | March 9, 1961? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 4715 (SR 39) [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Limit Federal Powers | March 11, 1962? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 108, p. 5051 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
Oklahoma | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | January 21, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 1172 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution 2") [ dead link ] | |
Oklahoma | Apportionment of Legislature, I | January 21, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 1172-1173 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution 3") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 1173 [ dead link ] | |
Kansas | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | January 31, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (SCR 3) [ dead link ] | |
Kansas | Apportionment of Legislature, I | January 31, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (SCR 4) [ dead link ] | |
Florida | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | February 5, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 2071-2072 ("Senate Memorial 12-X(63)" [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2072 [ dead link ] | |
Florida | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | February 5, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2072 ("Senate Memorial 13-X(63)" [ dead link ] | |
Idaho | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | February 14, 1963? January 26, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2281 (SJM 4) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 1229 (SJM 1) [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | February 21, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2768 (HJR 2) [ dead link ] | III |
Arkansas | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | February 21, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 2768-2769 (HJR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2769 [ dead link ] | III |
Arkansas | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | February 21, 1963? April 5, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (HJR 4) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 6917-6918 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6918 [ dead link ] | III III |
Arkansas | Proportional Electoral College, Other | February 21, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (HJR 12) [ dead link ] | III |
South Dakota | Proportional Electoral College, Other | March 11, 1963? | CR V.109 p.3982 [ dead link ] | ?? |
Montana | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 11, 1963? February 17, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3854 (SJR 15) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 2777 ("A Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
Idaho | Balanced Budget, Other | March 11, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3855 ("SJM 9") [ dead link ] | |
Montana | Proportional Electoral College, I | March 25, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4469 ("HJR 13") [ dead link ] | |
Wyoming | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | February 14, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109 pp. 4778-4779 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4779 [ dead link ] | |
Wyoming | Apportionment of Legislature, I | February 9, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4779 ("Enrolled Joint Memorial 14") [ dead link ] | |
Wyoming | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | February 15, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4779 ("Enrolled Joint Memorial 15") [ dead link ] | |
Alabama | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | March 13, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5250 (HJR 13) [ dead link ] | III |
Washington | Apportionment of Legislature, I | March 30, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5867 (HJM 1) [ dead link ] | III |
Missouri | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | April 8, 1963? February 22, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5868 (HCR 4) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3304 (HCR 2) [ dead link ] | III III |
Missouri | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | April 8, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5868 (HCR 5) [ dead link ] | III |
Utah | Proportional Electoral College, I | April 8, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5947 (HCR 1) [ dead link ] | |
Colorado | Proportional Electoral College, I | April 11, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 6659 (HJM 4) [ dead link ] | III |
Colorado | Income Tax, Limit Other | April 25, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 7060 (SJM 9) [ dead link ] | III |
Nevada | Apportionment of Legislature, I | February 12, 1963? February 17, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 9942 (SJR 2) [ dead link ] | III |
South Carolina | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | June 10, 1963? February 18, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10441 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3304 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Apportionment of Legislature, I | June 10, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10442 (SCR 149) [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | June 10, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10441 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | June 10, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10442 (SCR 148) [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | June 10, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 10441-10442 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10442 [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union | June 10, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 10442-10443 (SCR 147) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10443 [ dead link ] | |
Texas | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | April 4, 1963? July 26, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 11852 (HCR 22) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 18171 (SCR 24) [ dead link ] | |
Texas | Proportional Electoral College, I | May 22, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 11852-11853 (HCR 29) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11853 [ dead link ] | |
South Dakota | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 2, 1963? March 1, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 14639 (SJR 2) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol.111, pp.3722-3723 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3723 [ dead link ] | |
Wisconsin | Proportional Electoral College, I | March 2, 1963? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 14808 (Resolution Number Not Provided) [ dead link ] | III |
Virginia | Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 15, 1964? December 3, 1964? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 5659 (HJR 90) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 880-881 (HJR 6) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 881 [ dead link ] | |
Massachusetts | School Management, Other | March 18, 1964? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 7616 (Unnumbered resolution) appearing to have been approved only by the Massachusetts House of Representatives—and NOT at all by the Massachusetts Senate[ dead link ] | III |
Massachusetts | Senior Pensions | April 23, 1964? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 9875 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] | III |
Virginia | Mode of Amendment, Identical Text | December 3, 1964? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 880 (HJR 5) [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | School Management, States' Right | January 6, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 164-165 (SCR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 165 [ dead link ] | |
Arizona | Apportionment of Legislature, II | February 18, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3061 (HCM 1) [ dead link ] | |
Kansas | Apportionment of Legislature, II | January 27, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 3061-3062 (SCR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3062 [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | School Management, States' Right | February 18, 1965? | CR V.111 p.3304 [ dead link ] | |
Utah | Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 8, 1965? | CR V.111 p.4320 [ dead link ] | |
Maryland | Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 25, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 5820 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] | III |
North Carolina | Apportionment of Legislature, II | May 17, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 10673 ("Resolution 60") [ dead link ] | |
Minnesota | Apportionment of Legislature, II | May 17, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 10673 ("Resolution 5") [ dead link ] | III |
Oklahoma | Proportional Electoral College, I | May 12, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 11488 (SCR 35) [ dead link ] also found at Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 11802-11803 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 35") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11803 [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | Apportionment of Legislature, II | June 1, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 12110 (SCR 25) [ dead link ] | |
New Hampshire | Apportionment of Legislature, II | June 8, 1965? | CR V.111 p.12853 [ dead link ] | |
Illinois | Revenue Sharing, Other | June 9, 1965? | CR V.111 p.14144 [ dead link ] | III |
Florida | Apportionment of Legislature, II | June 22, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 14308 (HM 2433) [ dead link ] | |
Mississippi | Apportionment of Legislature, II | July 7, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 15769 ("S. Con. Res. 101") [ dead link ] | III |
Mississippi | School Management, States' Right | July 7, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 15769-15770 ("S. Con. Res. 102") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 15770 [ dead link ] | III |
Mississippi | Anti-Subversion | July 7, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 15770 ("H. Con. Res. 14") [ dead link ] | III |
Illinois | Apportionment of Legislature, II Apportionment of Legislature, Other | June 22, 1965 March 13, 1967 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 19379 ("Senate Resolution No. 52" and unicameral--not likewise approved by Illinois House of Representatives) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 8004 (HJR 32) [ dead link ] | III[ dead link ] |
Nebraska | Proportional Electoral College, I | August 10, 1965? | CR V.111 p.19775 [ dead link ] | III |
Nebraska | Apportionment of Legislature, I | September 22, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 24723 ("Legislative Resolution") [ dead link ] | III |
Ohio | Revenue Sharing, Other | September 28, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 25237 (SJR 16) [ dead link ] | III |
Kentucky | Apportionment of Legislature, II | October 6, 1965? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 26073-26074 ("Senate" Concurrent "Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 26074 [ dead link ] | III |
Alabama | Apportionment of Legislature, II | January 14, 1966? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, pp. 200-201 (SJR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 201 [ dead link ] | III |
New Mexico | Apportionment of Legislature, II | January 14, 1966? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, p. 199 (SJR 2) [ dead link ] | III |
Tennessee | Apportionment of Legislature, II | January 14, 1966? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, p. 199-200 (HJR 34) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 200 [ dead link ] | |
Illinois | Apportionment of Legislature, Other | March 13, 1967 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 8004 (HJR 32) [ dead link ] | III |
Indiana | Apportionment of Legislature, II | March 13, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 6384 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution No. 58") [ dead link ] | III |
Alabama | Revenue Sharing, Other | April 19, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, pp. 10117-10118 ("Resolution No. 11") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10118 [ dead link ] | III |
North Dakota | Apportionment of Legislature, Other | April 28, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 11175 (HCR I-1) [ dead link ] | |
Georgia | Revenue Sharing, Other | May 4, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, pp. 11743-11744 ("Resolution 96") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11744 [ dead link ] | |
Texas | Revenue Sharing, Other | June 28, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 17634 (SCR 12) [ dead link ] | |
Illinois | Revenue Sharing, Other | June 28, 1967? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 17634-17635 (SJR 63) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 17635 [ dead link ] | |
Iowa | Apportionment of Legislature, Other | May 13, 1969? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 12249 (SCR 13) [ dead link ] | III |
Florida | Revenue Sharing, Other | September 3, 1969? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 24116 (SM 397) [ dead link ] | |
New Hampshire | Revenue Sharing, I | December 1, 1969? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 36153-36154 ("Concurrent resolution..." [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 36154 [ dead link ] | |
Mississippi | School Management, Other School Management, No Assignment | March 5, 1970? March 15, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 6097 (SCR 514) [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8089 (HCR 55) [ dead link ] | III IV |
Louisiana | Anti-Subversion | June 22, 1970? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, pp. 20672-20673 (HCR 4-A) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 20673 [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | Income Tax, Limit Other | July 7, 1970? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 22906 (SCR 25) [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | Revenue Sharing, Other | July 10, 1970? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 23765 (HCR 270) [ dead link ] | |
New Jersey | Revenue Sharing, I | December 16, 1970? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 41879 (SCR 77) [ dead link ] | IV |
West Virginia | Revenue Sharing, I | January 26, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, pp. 541-542 (HCR 9) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 542 [ dead link ] | IV |
Massachusetts | Revenue Sharing, I | March 4, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 5020 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] | IV |
South Dakota | Revenue Sharing, I | March 8, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 5303 (HJR 503) [ dead link ] | IV |
North Dakota | Revenue Sharing, I | April 26, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 11841 (SCR 4013) [ dead link ] | |
Louisiana | Revenue Sharing, I | June 15, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, pp. 19801-19802 (SCR 138) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 19802 [ dead link ] | |
Ohio | Revenue Sharing, I | June 28, 1971? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 22280 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] | IV |
Delaware | Revenue Sharing, I | February 18, 1971? | CR V.117 p.3175 [ dead link ] | |
Oregon | Revenue Sharing, I | May 24, 1971? | CR V.117 p.16574 [ dead link ] | ?? |
Massachusetts | School Management, Other School Management, Other | September 8, 1971? March 28, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 30905 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] CR Vol. 119, pp. 12408-12409 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 12409 [ dead link ] | IV IV |
Michigan | School Management, No Assignment | November 16, 1971? | CR V.117 pp.41598-41599 (SCR 172) Printed in "Extensions of Remarks" portion of Congressional Record [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 41599 [ dead link ] | IV |
Iowa | Revenue Sharing, I | March 2, 1972? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, pp. 6501-6502 (HJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6502 [ dead link ] | IV |
Florida | Senate Control of Presiding Officer | April 4, 1972? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, p. 11444 (SM 227) [ dead link ] | |
Arizona | School Management, Prayer | April 4, 1972? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, p. 11445 (HCR 2009) [ dead link ] | |
Tennessee | School management, No Assignment | May 8, 1972? | CR V.118 p.16214 [ dead link ] | |
New York | School Management, Other | October 2, 1972? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, pp. 33047-33048 ("Joint Resolution No. 7) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 33048 [ dead link ] | IV |
Virginia | Balanced Federal Budget | March 15, 1973? March 10, 1975? March 29, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8091 (HJR 75) [ dead link ] CR Vol. 121, p. 5793 (SJR 107) [ dead link ] CR Vol. 122, pp. 8335-8336 (SJR 36) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8336 [ dead link ] | > |
Mississippi | Prayer in Public Buildings | March 20, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8689 (HCR 14) [ dead link ] | IV |
Virginia | School management, No Assignment | April 3, 1973? | CR V.119 p.10675 [ dead link ] | |
New Jersey | School Management, Other | April 9, 1973? | CR V.119 p.11446 [ dead link ] | ?? |
Texas | School Management, No Assignment | April 10, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 11515 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] | |
Oklahoma | School Management, No Assignment | April 25, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 14428 (HCR 1026) [ dead link ] | |
Maryland | School Management, Other | May 7, 1973? | CR V.119 p.14421 [ dead link ] | ?? |
Nevada | School Management, No Assignment | May 29, 1973? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, pp. 17022-17023 (SJR 7) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 17023 [ dead link ] | IV |
New Hampshire | School Management, Other | June 5, 1973? | CR V.119 p.18190 [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Balanced Federal Budget | March 10, 1975? March 8, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 5793 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] CR Vol. 125, p. 4372, POM-78 (HJR 1) [ dead link ] | III IV |
North Dakota | Balanced Federal Budget | March 11, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 9782, POM-205 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4018) The wording of S.C.R. No. 4018 is extremely poor and—depending upon interpretation—it might not even be a valid Article V Convention call | |
Mississippi | Balanced Federal Budget | April 29, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, pp. 12175-12176 (HCR 51) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 12176 [ dead link ] | III |
Missouri | Right to Life, Various | May 5, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 12867 (SCR 7) [ dead link ] | III |
Nevada | Limited Funding Mandates, Various | June 26, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 21065 (AJR 47) [ dead link ] | III |
Louisiana | Balanced Federal Budget | July 28, 1975? February 8, 1979? July 19, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 25312 (SCR 109) [ dead link ] CR V.125 p.2110-1 [ dead link ] Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 19470-19471, POM-394 (SCR 4) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 19471 [ dead link ] | |
Kentucky | School Management, No Assignment | September 8, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 27821 ("House" Joint "Resolution No. 29") [ dead link ] | III |
Alabama | Balanced Federal Budget | September 10, 1975? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 28347 (HJR 105) [ dead link ] | |
Georgia | Balanced Federal Budget | February 6, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 2740 (HR 469-1267) [ dead link ] | |
Delaware | Balanced Federal Budget | February 25, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 4329 (HCR 36) [ dead link ] | |
South Carolina | Balanced Federal Budget | February 25, 1976? February 8, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 4329 (Numerically Undesignated Resolution) [ dead link ] CR V.125 p.2114 [ dead link ] | |
Massachusetts | School Management, No Assignment | April 7, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 9735, (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] | III |
Oklahoma | Limited Funding Mandates, Various | June 7, 1976? | CR V.122 p.16814 [ dead link ] | III |
Louisiana | Right to Life, Various | July 22, 1976? | CR V.122 p.23550 [ dead link ] | |
Alabama | Balanced Federal Budget | August 18, 1976? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4861, POM-91 (House Joint Resolution No. 227) | |
Delaware | Right to Life, Various | January 1, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 17055, POM-687 (House Concurrent Resolution No. 9) | |
Maryland | Balanced Federal Budget | January 28, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 2545-2546, POM-59 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 4—also known as "Resolution No. 77") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2546 [ dead link ] | |
Virginia | Line Item Veto, Various | March 28, 1977? | CR V.123 p.9289 (1977 House Joint Resolution No. 168) [ dead link ] | |
New Jersey | Right to Life, Various | April 5, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 10481, POM-124 ("Senate No. 1271") [ dead link ] | IV |
South Dakota | Right to Life, Unborn Right to Life, Sacred Life | April 18, 1977? April 18, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 11048, POM-135 (HJR 503) [ dead link ] | |
Utah | Right to Life, Various | May 2, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 13057-13058, POM-151 (HJR 28) [ dead link ] remainder of text p.13058 [ dead link ] | |
Arkansas | Right to Life, Various | May 20, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 15808-15809, POM-189 (HJR 2) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 15809 [ dead link ] | IV |
Rhode Island | Right to Life, Various | May 20, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 15809, POM-190 ("Resolution") [ dead link ] | IV |
Texas | Balanced Federal Budget | May 30, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 5223-5224, POM-95 (HCR 31) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5224 [ dead link ] | IV |
Arizona | Balanced Federal Budget | June 14, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 18873-18874, POM-231 (HCM 2003) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 18874 [ dead link ] | |
Oregon | Balanced Federal Budget | June 16, 1977? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 5953, POM-104 (Senate Joint Memorial No. 2) | |
Massachusetts | Right to Life, Various | June 23, 1977? | CR V.123 p.20659 [ dead link ] | ?? |
Indiana | Right to Life, Various | July 22, 1977? | CR V.123 p.4797 [ dead link ] | |
Delaware | Appointment and Tenure of Federal Judges | January 1, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 2193, POM-453 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 79) | |
Colorado | Balanced Federal Budget | April 5, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 8778, POM-579 (Senate Joint Memorial No. 1) | V |
Nebraska | Right to Life, Various | April 21, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 12694, POM-637 (Legislative Resolution No. 152) [ dead link ] | IV |
Tennessee | Judicial Term Limits | April 25, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 11437, POM-612 (HJR 21) [ dead link ] | |
Tennessee | Balanced Federal Budget | April 25, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, pp. 11437-11438, POM-613 (HJR 22) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11438 [ dead link ] | |
Pennsylvania | Right to Life, Various | April 25, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 11438, POM-614 (House Bill No. 71--described as a "Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] | IV |
Oklahoma | Balanced Federal Budget | May 3, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 12397 (POM-629) (HJR 1049) [ dead link ] | |
Kansas | Balanced Federal Budget | May 19, 1978? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 14584, POM-657 (SCR 1661) [ dead link ] | IV |
Louisiana | Balanced Federal Budget | July 14, 1978? | [Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, pp. 20911-20912, POM-739 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 73)] | |
North Carolina | Balanced Federal Budget | January 29, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 1923, POM-37 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 1—also known as Resolution No. 5) | ?? |
Mississippi | Right to Life, Various | February 26, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3196, POM-49 (HCR 3) | IV |
Florida | Balanced Federal Budget | March 1, 1979? June 21, 1988? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3655, POM-59 ("Senate Memorial" No. 234) Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 3655-3656, POM-60 (HM 2801) remainder of text p. 3656 Cong. Rec. Vol. 134, p. 15363, POM-549 (SM 302) | |
Idaho | Balanced Federal Budget | March 1, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3657, POM-64 (HCR 7) | |
New Mexico | Balanced Federal Budget | March 1, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 3656-3657, POM-62 (SJR 1) remainder of text p. 3657 | IV |
South Dakota | Balanced Federal Budget | March 1, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3656, POM-61 (SJR 1) | |
Nebraska | Balanced Federal Budget | March 7, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4152, POM-67 (Legislative Resolution No. 106) | IV |
Georgia | Right to Life, Various | March 8, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4372, POM-79 (House Resolution No. 254) The wording of H.R. No. 254 indicates that it was adopted only by the Georgia House of Representatives—therefore, it cannot be a valid Article V Convention call | |
Utah | Balanced Federal Budget | March 8, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 4372-4373, POM-80 (HJR 12) | |
Arizona | Balanced Federal Budget | March 9, 1979 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 7920-7921, POM-149 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 1002) | |
Pennsylvania | Balanced Federal Budget | March 12, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4627-4628, POM-85 (House Concurrent "Resolution No. 236") | IV |
Arizona | Repeal Constitution's 16th Amendment and Prohibit Federal Government from Engaging in Business, Professional, Commercial, Financial or Industrial Enterprises | April 18, 1979 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 122201 POM-244 (House Joint Memorial No. 2001) | V |
Indiana | Balanced Federal Budget | May 1, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 9188, POM-192 ("Senate Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 8") | IV |
New Hampshire | Balanced Federal Budget | May 16, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125 p. 11584, POM-223 (HCR 8) | |
Iowa | Balanced Federal Budget | June 18, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 15227, POM-301 (SJR 1) | IV |
Nevada | Right to Life, Various | June 25, 1979? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 16350, POM-312 (SJR 27) | V |
Louisiana | Federal Executive Branch Rules and Regulations | July 17, 1979? | [Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 18954, POM-383 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 105)] | |
Nevada | Balanced Federal Budget | January 29, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, pp. 1104-1105, POM-535 (SJR 8) remainder of text p. 1105 | III |
Idaho | Right to Life, Various | March 21, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 6172, POM-602 (SCR 132) | |
Arizona | Coercive use of Federal Funds | April 17, 1980 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 11389, POM-730, (House Concurrent Resolution No. 2001) | |
Oklahoma | Right to Life, Various | April 24, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 8972, POM-701 (HJR 1053) | |
Tennessee | Right to Life, Various | May 2, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 9765, POM-712 (SJR 23) | |
Alabama | Right to Life, Various | May 8, 1980? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 10650, POM-717 (SJR 9) | IV |
Alabama | Require Federal Judges to be elected, or re-elected, every six years, rather than to be appointed | August 13, 1981 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 127, p. 20491 as well as p. 21684, POM-416 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 41) | V |
Alaska | Balanced Federal Budget | January 18, 1982? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 128, p. 2278 as well as p. 5643, POM-706 (House Joint Resolution No. 17—also designated as Legislative Resolve No. 1) | V |
Missouri | Balanced Federal Budget | July 21, 1983? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 129, p. 20352, POM-323 (SCR 3) | V |
Arizona | Line Item Veto, Various | June 5, 1984? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 130, p. 15611, POM-684 (SCR 1008) | |
South Dakota | Line Item Veto, Various | March 12, 1986? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 132, pp. 4473-4474, POM-599, (Senate Joint Resolution No. 4) remainder of text p. 4474 | |
Utah | Income Tax, Limit Other | February 23, 1987 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 133, p. 9736, POM-94 (SJR 8) | |
South Dakota | Term Limits on Members of Congress | April 4, 1989? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 135, pp. 5395-5396, POM-42 (HJR 1001) remainder of text p. 5396 | |
Georgia | Flag Desecration | April 16, 1991? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 137, pp. 8085-8086, POM-26 (House "Resolution No. 105") remainder of text p. 8086 | |
Colorado | Limited Funded Mandates, Various | June 26, 1992? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 138, p. 16552, POM-428 (SJM 92-3) | V |
South Dakota | Limited Funded Mandates, Various | March 22, 1993? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 139, p. 5905, POM-50 (SJR 3) | |
Missouri | No Judicial Taxing Power | June 29, 1993? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 139, p. 14565, POM-175 (SCR 9) | V |
Delaware | Income Tax, Limit Other | June 28, 1994? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 140, p. 14718, POM-554 (HCR 56) | |
Missouri | Limited Funding Mandates, Various | June 29, 1994? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 140, pp. 15072-15073, POM-575 (SCR 21) remainder of text p. 15073 | V |
Arizona | No Judicial Taxing Power | March 27, 1996? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 142, pp. S3012-S3013, POM-523 (SCR 1014) remainder of text p. S3013 | |
South Dakota | No Judicial Taxing Power | March 27, 1996? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 142, p. S3013, POM-526 (HCR 1010) | III |
Nevada | Term Limits on Members of Congress | June 29, 1996? | Nevada Constitution | III |
North Dakota | No Judicial Taxing Power | April 6, 2001? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 147, pp. S3704-S3705, POM-7 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 3031") remainder of text p. S3705 | III |
Louisiana | Posse Comitatus | April 29, 2008? | Cong. Rec. Vol. 154, p. S3504, POM-329 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 38") | IV |
Florida | Balanced Federal Budget | April 19, 2010 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S5563-S5564, POM-323 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 10") remainder of text p. S5564 | V |
Nebraska | Balanced Federal Budget (Reaffirmation of 1976 Legislative Resolution No. 106) | April 13, 2010 | "Legislative Resolution No. 538" | V |
North Dakota | Mode of Amendment, Other | April 14, 2011 | "House Concurrent Resolution No. 3048" | V |
North Dakota | Increase in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislatures | April 11, 2011 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 158, p. S1459, POM-66 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4007") | IV |
Alabama | Balanced Federal Budget | June 1, 2011 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S3666-S3667, POM-251 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 100") remainder of text p. S3667 | V |
Louisiana | Increase in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislatures | June 21, 2011 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 158, p. S2241, POM-69 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 87") | IV |
New Hampshire | Balanced Federal Budget | May 16, 2012 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5153, POM-197 ("House Concurrent Resolution 40") | V |
Ohio | Balanced Federal Budget | November 20, 2013 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S1174, POM-197 Senate Joint Resolution No. 5 also known as simply "Joint Resolution No. 5") | V |
Georgia | Balanced Federal Budget | February 20, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S3667-S3668, POM-254 ("Senate Resolution 371") remainder of text p. S3668 | V |
Georgia | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | March 6, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4332, POM-285 ("Senate Resolution No. 736") | V |
Michigan | Balanced Federal Budget | March 26, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S2098, POM-14 ("Enrolled Senate Joint Resolution V") | V |
Tennessee | Balanced Federal Budget | April 9, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, p. S5406, POM-128 ("House Joint Resolution No. 548") | V |
Alaska | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | April 19, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S6021, POM-345 ("House Joint Resolution 22", also referred to as "Legislative Resolve No. 68") | V |
Florida | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | April 21, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4332, POM-286 ("Senate Memorial 476") | V |
Florida | Balanced Federal Budget | April 21, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4333, POM-288 ("Senate Memorial 658") | V |
Florida | Legislation in Congress to contain only one subject and that one subject must be clearly expressed in the measure's title | April 23, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4333, POM-289 ("House Memorial 261") | V |
Vermont | Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission | May 2, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4331, POM-284 ("Joint Senate Resolution No. 27") | V |
Louisiana | Balanced Federal Budget | May 15, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S5563, POM-322 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 70") | V |
California | Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission | June 23, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S5507, POM-320 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 1") | V |
Illinois | Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission | December 3, 2014 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S71, POM-126 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 42") | V |
South Dakota | Balanced Federal Budget | February 17, 2015 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S6550, POM-255 ("House Joint Resolution No. 1001") | V |
New Jersey | Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission | February 23, 2015 | "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 132" | V |
Utah | Balanced Federal Budget | March 6, 2015 | "House Joint Resolution No. 7" | V |
North Dakota | Balanced Federal Budget | March 24, 2015 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 161, pp. S2399-S2400, POM-17 ("House Concurrent Resolution 3015") remainder of text p. S2400 | V |
Alabama | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [6] | May 21, 2015 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 161 pp. S8601-S8602, POM-124 ("House Joint Resolution 112") | V |
Tennessee | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | February 4, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S6534, POM-117 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 67") | V |
Florida | Term limits on Members of Congress | February 10, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S112, POM-6 ("House Memorial 417") | V |
Indiana | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | February 29, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S6663, POM-256 ("Senate Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 14") | V |
West Virginia | Balanced Federal Budget | March 12, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5277, POM-201 and POM-202 ("House Concurrent Resolution 36") | V |
Alaska | Countermand Amendment, which would allow states to propose initiatives that could repeal any federal statute, executive order, judicial decision, or regulatory decision if three-fifths of state legislatures approved. [7] [8] | April 16, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, p. S703, POM-164 ("House Joint Resolution No. 14", also referred to as "Legislative Resolve No. 49") | V |
Oklahoma | Combination of: (1) Balanced Federal Budget; and (2) Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | April 18, 2016 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, pp. S6354-6355, POM-213 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 4") remainder of text p. S6355 | V |
Louisiana | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | May 25, 2016 | "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 52" | V |
Rhode Island | Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Rhode Island lawmakers chose to approve two separate unicameral resolutions, rather than to adopt a single bicameral resolution. The validity of this approach is subject to question). | June 16, 2016 (R.I. House version) and June 17, 2016 (R.I. Senate version) | Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5276, POM-198 (R 326—H 7670) and Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, pp. S5276-S5277, POM-199 (R 327—S 2589) remainder of text p. S5277 | V |
Wyoming | Balanced Federal Budget | February 27, 2017 | "House Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 2" | V |
Arizona | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [9] [10] | March 13, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, pp. S6534-S6535, POM-118 and POM-120 ("House Concurrent Resolution 2010") | V |
North Dakota | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [11] [12] | March 24, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S2527, POM-16 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 3006") | V |
Arizona | Balanced Federal Budget [13] [14] | March 27, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S6535, POM-119 and POM-121 ("House Concurrent Resolution 2013") | V |
Texas | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | May 10, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S4056, POM-65 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 2") | V |
Missouri | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | May 12, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, pp. S3361-S3362, POM-40 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4") | V |
Wisconsin | Balanced Federal Budget [15] [16] | November 7, 2017 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, pp. S109-S110, POM-154 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 21") | V |
Alabama | Term Limits on Members of Congress | January 25, 2018 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, pp. S3759-S3760, POM-243 ("House Joint Resolution No. 23") | V |
Missouri | Term Limits on Members of Congress [17] | May 17, 2018 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, p. S5422, POM-278 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 40") | V |
Arkansas | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | February 14, 2019 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, pp. S5601-S5602, POM-138 and POM-139 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 3") | V |
Utah | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | March 5, 2019 | "Senate Joint Resolution No. 9" | V |
Mississippi | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials—but specifically excluding the imposition of term limits upon members of Congress | March 27, 2019 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, p. S5447, POM-133 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 596") | V |
West Virginia | Term Limits on Members of Congress | March 22, 2021 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 167, p. S4517, POM-18 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 9") | V |
Oklahoma | Combination of: (1) Balanced Federal Budget; and (2) Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress (reprising 2016 joint resolution numbered as "Senate Joint Resolution No. 4" which was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2023) | April 20, 2021 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 167, pages S6839 through S6841, POM-85 and POM-86 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 23") | V |
Missouri | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress (reprising 2017 concurrent resolution likewise numbered as "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4" which was scheduled to expire on the fifth anniversary of its adoption—that being in 2022) | May 13, 2021 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 167, pp. S4770-S4771, POM-22 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4") | V |
Wisconsin | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | January 25, 2022 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 168, p. S4618, POM-219 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 9"—also known as "Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 9") | V |
Nebraska | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | January 28, 2022 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, pp. S1117-S1118, POM-114 ("Legislative Resolution No. 14") | V |
Wisconsin | Term Limits on Members of Congress | February 24, 2022 | Cong. Rec. Vol. 168, pp. S4616-S4617, POM-216 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 102"—also known as "Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 18") | V |
West Virginia | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | March 4, 2022 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, pp. S2336-S2337, POM-136 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 31") | V |
South Carolina | Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress | March 29, 2022 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, p. S3074, POM-155 ("H. 3205") | V |
Missouri | Term Limits on Members of Congress (reprising 2018 concurrent resolution numbered as "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 40" which was scheduled to expire on the fifth anniversary of its adoption—that being in 2023) | May 10, 2022 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, p. S4043, POM-185 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 25") | V |
Oklahoma | Term Limits on Members of Congress | April 20, 2023 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 169, p. S4755, POM-70 and POM-71 ("House Joint Resolution No. 1032") | V |
California | Regulation of Firearms; Raising Age to 21 | September 14, 2023 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 170, pp. S72-S73, POM-92 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 7") | V |
Florida | Term Limits on Members of Congress | February 1, 2024 | ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 693") | V |
Florida | Balanced Federal Budget | February 1, 2024 | ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 703") | V |
Florida | Prohibit Congress from making any federal law applying to the general public that does not also equally apply to all U.S. Representatives, to all U.S. Senators, and to all other persons within the legislative branch of the federal government | March 4, 2024 | ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 7055") | V |
Florida | Grant to President of the United States Line-Item Veto Authority within Federal Appropriations Legislation | March 4, 2024 | ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 7057") | V |
Tennessee | Term Limits on Members of Congress | April 11, 2024 | Cong. Rec., Vol. 170, pp. S5188-S5189, POM-144 ("House Joint Resolution No. 5") | V |
Louisiana | Term Limits on Members of Congress | May 13, 2024 | ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 2") | V |
In 1929 Wisconsin presented a list of states having made applications for a convention exceeding the two-thirds requirement that was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, with no further action. In 2013 states began listing existing state applications when joining them.
In 1929 Wisconsin applied to Congress to perform their constitutional duty to call a convention, listing Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin as states having made an application for a convention. There were 48 states in 1929, so 32 applications would be required to call a convention. 35 states were named.
Links to the text of applications by all states except California and North Carolina are provided in the table above. A reference to an application by California has been found in the Congressional Record and the text of an application by South Carolina is given in the table above. It may be that North Carolina was mistakenly included for South Carolina.
Three states, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin, had applied for a general convention. Eleven states listed had applied for a convention to prohibit polygamy (Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont, and Washington), plus South Carolina. Idaho had included the direct election of the President and Vice President with their request for direct election of Senators. Thus, 16 states clearly had outstanding applications.
Alabama and Georgia had outstanding issues from 1832 and 1833, making a less certain 18. Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Nevada, and Oklahoma would be added if we include class II requests for Direct Elections of Senators, for a total of 25.
The only known records for an application New York and Virginia are their ratification documents, before the Bill of Rights. New Jersey and Kentucky applied for a convention to prevent the Civil War, and class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. Arkansas, Maine, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah only had documented class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. California is most likely in this group. These ten states have applications that may have been mooted by amendments proposed by Congress.
The balanced budget application of Ohio in 2013 through that of Arizona in 2017—except North Dakota—include a list of previous state applications for a balanced budget. Wisconsin's 2017 application also does not contain such a list. These lists mostly extend the previous lists, except possibly omitting state applications from the same legislative session.
Arizona has the most complete list, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. This represents 29 states.
Applications for all of the states mentioned above can be found in the list. Additionally, rescinded applications can be found for Delaware, Idaho, Oregon and Virginia. In particular, Delaware is included in lists prior to their rescission in 2016, but not after.
Wyoming and Wisconsin have made recent applications not included by Arizona, while Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado have recently rescinded their applications. This suggests a current total of 27 states, seven short of the required 34.
The Convention of States Resolution includes fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress.
A complete list of passed resolutions with vote summaries, filing dates, and related links can be found using the Convention of States website.
As of November 10, 2023, 19 of the 34 states needed have passed the resolution.
The Wolf Pac Resolution calls for regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Rhode Island included a count of the states in their 2016 application.
Rhode Island has the most complete list, including the following five states: California, Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont. All of these applications are included in the list, with no recent additions.
The U.S. Term Limits Resolution, campaigned for by US Term Limits, calls for a constitutional amendment limiting the terms of members of Congress. States passing applications are Florida in 2016, Alabama in 2018, Missouri in 2018 (reprised in 2022 to avert expiration), West Virginia in 2021, Wisconsin in 2022, Oklahoma in 2023, Tennessee in 2024, and Louisiana in 2024—for a total of eight states to date.
Michael Stokes Paulsen holds that the applications for a convention alone should govern the convention. [18] Thus, this section contains counts of applications based on groupings not excluded by the applications themselves.
Counts including class IV, V, or VI applications would be limited to those with the same description and can be found by sorting the list by topic.
Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin have outstanding applications for a convention to propose amendments, with no accompanying issue.
Alabama has a request for a convention limiting tariffs, and South Carolina one for clarification on Amendment X, each implying that other amendments may be considered.
24 more states have outstanding class III applications. These are Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
This gives a total of 31 states with known class I, II, or III applications. Three more applications would meet the 2/3rds requirement to call a convention.
Thomas E. Brennan holds that, in 1982, it was necessary, desirable, and feasible to hold a convention. [19] He lists the following counts in the introduction to his claim:
Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the procedure for altering the Constitution. Under Article Five, the process to alter the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments, and subsequent ratification.
The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state. The amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held.
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would, if added, explicitly prohibit sex discrimination. It was written by Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman and introduced in Congress in December 1923 as a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose of the ERA is to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. Proponents assert it would end legal distinctions between men and women in matters of divorce, property, employment, and other matters. Opponents originally argued it would remove protections that women needed. In the 21st century, opponents argue it is no longer needed and some disapprove of its potential effects on abortion and transgender rights.
The Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress may take effect only after the next election of the House of Representatives has occurred. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.
The District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would have given the District of Columbia full representation in the United States Congress, full representation in the Electoral College system, and full participation in the process by which the Constitution is amended. It would have also repealed the Twenty-third Amendment, which granted the District of Columbia the same number of electoral votes as that of the least populous state, but gave it no role in contingent elections.
The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could theoretically still be adopted by the state legislatures. It would have shielded slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress.
The Child Labor Amendment (CLA) is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution that would specifically authorize Congress to regulate "labor of persons under eighteen years of age". The amendment was proposed on June 2, 1924, following Supreme Court rulings in 1918 and 1922 that federal laws regulating and taxing goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 and 16 were unconstitutional.
A convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also referred to as an Article V Convention, state convention, or amendatory convention is one of two methods authorized by Article Five of the United States Constitution whereby amendments to the United States Constitution may be proposed: on the Application of two thirds of the State legislatures the Congress shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which become law only after ratification by three-fourths of the states. The Article V convention method has never been used; but 33 amendments have been proposed by the other method, a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress; and 27 of these have been ratified by three-fourths of the States. Although there has never been a federal constitutional convention since the original one, at the state level more than 230 constitutional conventions have assembled in the United States.
State ratifying conventions are one of the two methods established by Article V of the United States Constitution for ratifying proposed constitutional amendments. The only amendment that has been ratified through this method thus far is the 21st Amendment in 1933.
A convention, in the sense of a meeting, is a gathering of individuals who meet at an arranged place and time in order to discuss or engage in some common interest. The most common conventions are based upon industry, profession, and fandom. Trade conventions typically focus on a particular industry or industry segment, and feature keynote speakers, vendor displays, and other information and activities of interest to the event organizers and attendees. Professional conventions focus on issues of concern along with advancements related to the profession. Such conventions are generally organized by societies or communities dedicated to promotion of the topic of interest. Fan conventions usually feature displays, shows, and sales based on pop culture and guest celebrities. Science fiction conventions traditionally partake of the nature of both professional conventions and fan conventions, with the balance varying from one to another. Conventions also exist for various hobbies, such as gaming or model railroads.
U.S. Term Limits (USTL) is a non-profit, non-partisan grassroots organization dedicated to enacting term limits for elected officials at every level of government in the United States. It was founded in 1992, and claims to have helped facilitate more than 500 successful term limits initiatives at various levels of government.
In the United States, term limits restrict the number of terms of office an officeholder may serve. At the federal level, the president of the United States can serve a maximum of two four-year terms, limited by the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Some state government offices are also term-limited, including executive, legislative, and judicial offices.
The Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution is a proposed change to the United States Constitution. The amendment's advocates say that it will allow parents' rights to direct the upbringing of their children, protected from federal interference, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Amendment was first proposed during the 110th Congress as House Joint Resolution 97 in July 2008, but no action was taken during that Congress. The Amendment has been described as a "wedge issue" and part of the culture wars.
The calling of a Second Constitutional Convention of the United States is a proposal made by some academics and activists from across the political spectrum for the purpose of making substantive reforms to the federal government of the United States by rewriting the U.S. Constitution.
Wolf-PAC is an American nonpartisan political action committee formed in 2011 with the goal of adding an "amendment to the United States Constitution to ensure balance, integrity, and transparency to our national system of campaign finance".
The proposed "Liberty" Amendment to the United States Constitution was first proffered, pursuant to the Constitution's Article V, for the consideration of the 82nd United States Congress on June 28, 1952, in the form of House Joint Resolution No. 491 by the late United States Representative Ralph W. Gwinn of New York.
JOINT RESOLUTION, [paragraph break] Relative to requesting congress to call a convention of the several states of the Union. [paragraph break] Resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, That this general assembly does hereby make application to congress to call a convention for proposing amendments to the constitution of the United States, pursuant to the fifth article thereof. [paragraph break] Resolved, That the governor of this state be requested to communicate the above resolution to the president of the United States, with the request that he lay the same before congress.