List of state applications for an Article V Convention

Last updated

This is a list of known applications made to the United States Congress by the state legislatures for a Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution under Article V of the Constitution which provides in pertinent part:

Contents

The Congress, ..., on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments ... which, ..., shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths thereof, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress.

A discussion on the history of this process can be found at Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution. In particular, theories as to the validity of rescission of applications may also be found there as well as in List of rescissions of Article V Convention applications. All known applications are listed here, noting if and when such an application was known to have been subsequently rescinded.

On January 6, 2015, the United States House of Representatives began the process of cataloging applications submitted to the House by the state legislatures with the adoption of a new provision in the House's parliamentary rules of procedure. Previously, all documents related to Article V Convention applications were administratively processed as memorials and only summarized in the House's portion of the Congressional Record and then referred to the House's Judiciary Committee. The Clerk of the House, on that office's webpage, has since listed somebut not allapplications and rescissions received by Congress' lower chamber since 1960. [1] As this list may so easily be subsequently removed by a mere change in House rules, references to the actual Congressional Record are preferred. In its portion of the Congressional Record, the United States Senate, by contrast, typically publishes the entire verbatim text of a state legislature's application for an Article V Convention rather than to merely summarize the application's content. Once published verbatim in the Record, the Senate refers such memorials to its own Judiciary Committee.

The Congressional Record prior to 1876 is available through the Library of Congress, [2] and online since 1995. [3] In 1990, Judge Bruce Van Sickle and attorney Lynn M. Boughey compiled a list from the Congressional Record of state applications for an Article V Convention in the Hamline Law Review. Photocopies of the relevant sections of the Congressional Record have are available through Friends of the Article V Convention (FOAVC) for the gap in the electronically available Congressional Record.

Van Sickle–Boughey classification

In "A Lawful and Peaceful Revolution", [4] Van Sickle and Boughey define five classifications of applications:

The following is added to this list, where the original text was not recorded in the Congressional Record:

The following is also added to this list:

Van Sickle and Boughey indicate which applications have been rescinded by their state by encasing these in parentheses, and make no note of which applications have led to amendments proposed by Congress.

In the table below, the classification of rescinded applications are stricken, with the year of rescission given in parentheses and a link to the record of the rescission. Those applications which led to amendments proposed by Congress are listed in parentheses.

List of state applications for an Article V convention

Although the table below has sortable columns, applications are initially arranged by date approved by the state legislature or by date of entry into the Congressional Record. Application classes are encased in parentheses if Congress presented an amendment on the topic given and stricken if the state legislature has subsequently rescinded its application. All descriptions with six or more states have identical amendment text, unless specified. As of February 2024, only the Hawaii State Legislature has never approved an Article V convention application through both its upper chamber and its lower chamber during the same legislative session.

State applications for an Article V convention (and rescissions thereof)
StateIssue / TopicDate of approval by state's legislatureReceipt by CongressApplication classification (or year of application's rescission)
VirginiaBill of RightsNovember 14, 1788 AC V.1 258-259 (II) 2004
New YorkBill of RightsFebruary 5, 1789 AC V.1 282
Text [ dead link ]
(II)
GeorgiaClarify Amendment XDecember 12, 1832 J HR V22.2 270-271 II 2004 [ dead link ]
South CarolinaClarify Amendment XDecember 19, 1832 J HR V22.2 219-220 II 2004
AlabamaLimitation on TariffsJanuary 12, 1833 J HR V22.2 361-362 II
IndianaGeneral and Unlimited Article V ConventionMarch 13, 1861? CG V.37.S 1465-6 I
OhioGeneral and Unlimited Article V Convention [5] March 20, 1861 1861 Ohio Laws 181 I
New JerseyFinal Resolution for SlaveryFebruary 1, 1861 CG V. 36.2 p. 681 (II)
KentuckyFinal Resolution for SlaveryFebruary 5, 1861 CG V.36.2 p. 773 (II)
IllinoisFinal Resolution for SlaveryFebruary 28, 1861 CG V.36.2 p. 1270 (??)
NebraskaDirect Election of Senators, OtherApril 14, 1893 1893 Neb. Laws 466-7 III
TexasGeneral and Unlimited Article V ConventionJune 5, 1899? Cong. Rec. Vol. 33, p. 219 ("Concurrent resolution, S.C.R. No. 4") [ dead link ](II) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
MinnesotaDirect Election of Senators, OtherFebruary 13, 1901? CR V.34 p.2561 [ dead link ](III)
PennsylvaniaDirect Election of Senators, IIFebruary 13, 1901? CR V.45 p.7118 [ dead link ](III)
IdahoDirect Election of President, Vice-President and SenatorsFebruary 14, 1901? CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ] III 1999 [ dead link ]
MontanaDirect Election of Senators, II
Direct Election of Senators, II
February 21, 1901?
January 31, 1905?
CR V.35 p.208 [ dead link ]
CR V.39 p.2447 [ dead link ]
(III) 2007 [ dead link ]
(III) 2007 [ dead link ]
OregonDirect Election of Senators, Other
Direct Election of Senators, I
Direct Election of Senators, Other
February 23, 1901?
March 10, 1903?
January 26, 1909?
CR V.35 p.117 [ dead link ]
CR V.45 p.7118 [ dead link ]
CR V.43 p.2025 [ dead link ]
(III) 2000 [ dead link ]
(III) 2000 [ dead link ]
(III) 2000 [ dead link ]
TennesseeDirect Election of Senators, II
Direct Election of Senators, Other
March 27, 1901?
March 14, 1905?
CR V.35 p.2344 [ dead link ]
CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ]
(III) 2010
(III)
ColoradoDirect Election of Senators, IApril 1, 1901? CR V.45 p.7113 [ dead link ](II)
MichiganDirect Election of Senators, OtherApril 9, 1901? CR V.35 p.117 [ dead link ](III)
TexasDirect Election of Senators, IApril 17, 1901? CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ](II)
ArkansasDirect Election of Senators, OtherApril 25, 1901? CR V.45 p.7113 [ dead link ](III)
KentuckyDirect Election of Senators, IIFebruary 10, 1902? CR V.45 p.7115 [ dead link ](III)
IllinoisDirect Election of Senators, I
Direct Election of Senators, Other
February 10, 1903?
May 23, 1907?
CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ]
CR V.42 p.164 [ dead link ]
(II)
(III)
NevadaDirect Election of Senators, IIFebruary 25, 1903? CR V.37 p.24 [ dead link ](III)
UtahDirect Election of Senators, IMarch 12, 1903? CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
WashingtonDirect Election of Senators, OtherMarch 12, 1903? CR V.45 p.7119 [ dead link ](II)
NebraskaDirect Election of Senators, IMarch 25, 1903? CR V.45 p.7116-7 [ dead link ](III)
IowaDirect Election of Senators, IMarch 24, 1904? CR V.38 p.4959 [ dead link ](III)
MissouriDirect Election of Senators, IIMarch 18, 1905? CR V.40 p.1905 [ dead link ](III)
South DakotaDirect Election of Senators, Other
Direct Election of Senators, I
February 2, 1907?
February 9, 1909?
CR V.41 p.1907 [ dead link ]
CR V.43 p.2667-2668 [ dead link ]
(III)
(III)
DelawareAnti-PolygamyFebruary 11, 1907? CR V.41 p.3011 [ dead link ] III 2016 [ dead link ]
MissouriGeneral and Unlimited Article V ConventionMarch 6, 1907? CR V.45 p.7116 [ dead link ]I
IndianaDirect Election of Senators, OtherMarch 11, 1907? CR V.45 p.7114 [ dead link ](II)
IowaDirect Election of Senators, OtherMarch 12, 1907? CR V.45 p.7114-5 [ dead link ](II)
NevadaDirect Election of Senators, IMarch 23, 1907? CR V.42 p.163 [ dead link ](II)
New JerseyDirect Election of Senators, IMay 28, 1907? CR V.42 p.164 [ dead link ](III)
LouisianaDirect Election of Senators, OtherNovember 25, 1907? CR V.42 p.5906 [ dead link ] (II) 1990 [ dead link ]
OklahomaDirect Election of Senators, OtherJanuary 20, 1908? CR V.45 p.7117-8 [ dead link ] (II) 2009
South DakotaAnti-PolygamyFebruary 6, 1909? CR V.43 p.2670 [ dead link ]III
KansasDirect Election of Senators, IMarch 6, 1909? CR V.45 p.7115 [ dead link ](II)
WisconsinDirect Election of Senators, IMay 31, 1910? CR V.45 p.7119-20 [ dead link ](III)
WashingtonAnti-PolygamySeptember 1, 1910? CR V.46 p.651 [ dead link ]III
MontanaDirect Election of Senators, OtherJanuary 20, 1911? CR V.46 p.2411 [ dead link ] (II) 2007 [ dead link ]
MaineDirect Election of Senators, OtherFebruary 22, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 46, p. 4280 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ](III)
TennesseeAnti-PolygamyFebruary 17, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 187 ("Senate joint resolution 43") [ dead link ] III 2010
MontanaAnti-PolygamyMarch 1, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, pp. 98-99 ("House joint memorial 7") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 99 [ dead link ] III 2007 [ dead link ]
NebraskaAnti-PolygamyMarch 14, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 99 ("Joint resolution by House and Senate of Nebraska Legislature") [ dead link ]III
OhioAnti-PolygamyMarch 15, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, pp. 660-661 ("House joint resolution 13") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 661 [ dead link ]III
IllinoisPrevent and Suppress MonopoliesMay 11, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 1298 ("House joint resolution 9") [ dead link ]III
WisconsinGeneral and Unlimited Article V ConventionJune 12, 1911? Cong. Rec. Vol. 47, p. 1873 ("Joint resolution (J. Res. 15, S.)") [ dead link ]I
CaliforniaDirect Election of Senators, IJune 13, 1911? CR V.47 p.2000 [ dead link ](??)
VermontAnti-PolygamyDecember 18, 1912? Cong. Rec. Vol. 49, p. 1433 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ]III
IllinoisAnti-PolygamyMarch 12, 1913? Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, pp. 120-121 (Senate joint resolution 12") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 121 [ dead link ]III
OregonAnti-PolygamyJanuary 20, 1913? Cong. Rec. Vol. 49, p. 2463 ("Senate joint resolution 2") [ dead link ] III 2000 [ dead link ]
WisconsinAnti-PolygamyMarch 26, 1913? Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, pp. 42-43 (No number, or resolution type, is given for this resolution) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 43 [ dead link ] See, also, Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 116 [ dead link ]III
MissouriSupreme Court JurisdictionApril 15, 1913? Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 2428 ("House joint and concurrent resolution 23") [ dead link ]III
MichiganAnti-PolygamyJuly 2, 1913? Cong. Rec. Vol. 50, p. 2290 ("House resolution No. 120") [ dead link ]III
South CarolinaAnti-PolygamyFebruary 15, 1915? Cong. Rec. Vol. 53, p. 2442 ("Concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] III 2004
LouisianaMode of Amendment, OtherJanuary 12, 1920? CR V.60 p.31 [ dead link ] ?? 1990 [ dead link ]
NevadaAnti-ProhibitionDecember 7, 1925? CR V.67 p.458 [ dead link ](??)
WisconsinDirect Election of President and VPDecember 7, 1925? CR V.67 p.458 [ dead link ](??)
WisconsinGeneral and Unlimited Article V ConventionJune 10, 1929 Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 2590 ("Senate Joint Resolution 65") [ dead link ](??)
WisconsinArticle V Requirements Already Met for Convention CallSeptember 4, 1929? Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 3369 ("Senate Joint Resolution 83") [ dead link ](??)
WisconsinArticle V Requirements Already Met for Convention CallSeptember 23, 1929? Cong. Rec. Vol. 71, p. 3856 ("Joint Resolution No. 83, S.") [ dead link ](??)
MassachusettsAnti-ProhibitionMarch 13, 1931? Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 45 ("Resolutions") [ dead link ](III)
New YorkAnti-ProhibitionDecember 8, 1931? Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 48 ("Assembly 4") [ dead link ](IV)
WisconsinAnti-ProhibitionDecember 8, 1931? Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 57 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ](III)
New JerseyAnti-ProhibitionFebruary 1, 1932? Cong. Rec. Vol. 75, p. 3299 ("Joint Resolution 1") [ dead link ](III)
CaliforniaTax on Government SecuritiesJuly 9, 1935? Cong. Rec. Vol. 79, p. 10814 ("Senate joint resolution") [ dead link ]III
CaliforniaFederal Labor LawsJuly 9, 1935? Cong. Rec. Vol. 79, p. 10814 ("Senate Joint Resolution 23") [ dead link ]III
OregonGeneral Welfare Act of 1937 ("Townsend National Recovery Plan")February 1, 1939? Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, p. 985 ("House Joint Memorial 1") [ dead link ] III 2000 [ dead link ]
WyomingIncome Tax, Limit IIMarch 8, 1939? Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, pp. 2509-2510 ("House Joint Memorial 4") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2510 [ dead link ] III 2009
MarylandIncome Tax, Limit IIMarch 27, 1939? Cong. Rec. Vol. 84, p. 3320 ("House resolution") appearing to have been approved only by the Maryland House of Delegatesand NOT at all by the Maryland Senate[ dead link ]III
Rhode IslandIncome Tax, Limit IMarch 26, 1940? Cong. Rec. Vol. 86, p. 3407 ("Resolution") [ dead link ]III
IowaIncome Tax, Limit IIApril 18, 1941? Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, p. 3172 ("House Concurrent Resolution 15") [ dead link ]III
MaineIncome Tax, Limit IApril 17, 1941? Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, pp. 3370-3371 ("Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3371 [ dead link ] III 1953 [ dead link ]
MassachusettsIncome Tax, Limit IApril 29, 1941? Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, pp. 3812-3813 ("Resolutions") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3813 [ dead link ] III 1952 [ dead link ]
MichiganIncome Tax, Limit IMay 16, 1941? Cong. Rec. Vol. 87, p. 4537 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 20") [ dead link ]III
IowaPresidential Term LimitsMarch 26, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 2516 ("House Concurrent Resolution 26") [ dead link ](III)
IllinoisPresidential Term LimitsMarch 26, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 2516-2517 ("Senate Joint Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2517 [ dead link ](III)
MichiganPresidential Term LimitsApril 6, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 2944 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 24") [ dead link ](III)
New HampshireIncome Tax, IIApril 29, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 3761-3762 ("A concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3762 [ dead link ] III 2010
DelawareIncome Tax, Limit IMay 3, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 4017 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 6") [ dead link ] III 2016 [ dead link ]
IllinoisIncome Tax, Limit IIMay 26, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 742-743 (HJR 32) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 743 [ dead link ] III 1952 [ dead link ]
PennsylvaniaLimited Funding Mandates, VariousMay 27, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 8220 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ]III
PennsylvaniaIncome Tax, Limit IIMay 27, 1943? CR V.89 pp.8220-8221 ("[House Concurrent resolution [No. 50]"][ dead link ]III
AlabamaIncome Tax, Limit IJuly 8, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, pp. 7523-7524 ("House Joint Resolution 66") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7524 [ dead link ]III
WisconsinIncome Tax, Limit ISeptember 14, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 7524 ("Assembly Joint Resolution 55") [ dead link ]III
WisconsinPresidential Term LimitsSeptember 14, 1943? Cong. Rec. Vol. 89, p. 7525 ("Joint Resolution No. 38, A") [ dead link ](III)
KentuckyIncome Tax, Limit IMarch 20, 1944? Cong. Rec. Vol. 90, pp. 4040-4041 ("House Resolution 79") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4041 [ dead link ] III 1951 [ dead link ]
New JerseyIncome Tax, Limit IFebruary 25, 1944? CR V.90 p.6141 [ dead link ] III 1954 [ dead link ]
CaliforniaWorld FederationApril 14, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 4568-4569 ("Assembly Joint Resolution 26") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4569 [ dead link ]IV
New JerseyWorld FederationApril 14, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 4571 ("Assembly Concurrent Resolution 17") [ dead link ]IV
North CarolinaWorld FederationApril 20, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 6587-6588 ("Resolution 37") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6588 [ dead link ]IV
MichiganRevenue Sharing, IIMay 5, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 5628-5629 (HCR 26) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5629 [ dead link ]IV
FloridaWorld FederationMay 16, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 7000 ("Senate Memorial 282") [ dead link ] III 2010
NebraskaRevenue Sharing, IIMay 25, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, pp. 7893-7894 ("Legislative Resolution 32") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7894 [ dead link ] IV 1953 [ dead link ]
ConnecticutWorld FederationJune 1, 1949? Cong. Rec. Vol. 95, p. 7689 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ]IV
KansasIncome Tax, Limit IMarch 28, 1951? Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, p. 2936 (SCR 4) [ dead link ]III
IowaRevenue Sharing, IIApril 17, 1951? Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 3939-3940 (SCR 11) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3940 [ dead link ]IV
FloridaIncome Tax, Limit IMay 10, 1951? Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 5155-5156 (SCR 206) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5156 [ dead link ] III 2010
MaineRevenue Sharing, IIJune 4, 1951? Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 6033-6034 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6034 [ dead link ]IV
New HampshireRevenue Sharing, IIAugust 28, 1951? Cong. Rec. Vol. 97, pp. 10716-10717 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10717 [ dead link ] IV 2010
ArkansasIncome Tax, Limit IIFebruary 4, 1952? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 742 (SCR 10) [ dead link ]III
UtahIncome Tax, Limit IFebruary 11, 1952? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 947 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
New MexicoRevenue Sharing, IIFebruary 11, 1952? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 947-948 (HJR 12) [ dead link ] p. 948 [ dead link ]IV
GeorgiaLimited Treaty Powers, VariousJanuary 29, 1952? CR V.98 p.1057 [ dead link ] III 2004 [ dead link ]
GeorgiaIncome Tax, Limit IFebruary 6, 1952? CR V.98 p.1057 [ dead link ] III 2004 [ dead link ]
IndianaIncome Tax, Limit II
Income Tax, Limit II
February 18, 1952?
March 12, 1957?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 1056-1057 (HCR 10) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 1057 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6474-6475 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6475 [ dead link ]
III
III
VirginiaIncome Tax, Limit IFebruary 21, 1952? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, p. 1496 (HJR 32) [ dead link ]III 2004
CaliforniaMotor Vehicle Tax DistributionApril 16, 1952? Cong. Rec. Vol. 98, pp. 4003-4004 (AJR 8) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4004 [ dead link ]III
LouisianaIncome Tax, Limit IJanuary 13, 1953? Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, p. 320 ("Concurrent resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 321 [ dead link ] III 1954 [ dead link ]
South DakotaMode of Amendment, Other
Mode of Amendment, by 12 States
Mode of Amendment, Identical Text
March 5, 1953?
February 15, 1955?
March 2, 1963?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, pp. 9180-9181 (SJR 4) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 9181 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 2861-2862 (SJR 5) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2862 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 14638-14639 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 14639 [ dead link ]
IV 2010
IV 2010
III 2010
IllinoisMode of Amendment, Other
Mode of Amendment, Identical Text
June 25, 1953?
March 5, 1963?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 99, p. 9864 (HJR 37) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3788 (SJR 4) [ dead link ]
IV
III
GeorgiaSchool Management, States' Right
School Management, States' Right
School Management, States' Right
January 31, 1955?
February 5, 1959?
March 4, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, p. 1532 ("Resolution") [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 1834 (HR 99) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 5817 (HR 128-212) [ dead link ]
III 2004 [ dead link ]
III 2004 [ dead link ]
III 2004 [ dead link ]
TexasMode of Amendment, by 12 States
Mode of Amendment, Identical Text
March 14, 1955?
April 4, 1963?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 2770-2771 (SCR 15) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2771 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 11852 (HCR 21) [ dead link ]
(III) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38 (IV) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
OklahomaIncome Tax, Limit OtherMay 23, 1955? Cong. Rec. Vol. 101, pp. 8397-8398 (SJR 15) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8398 (referred to the Committee on Finance rather than to the Committee on the Judiciary)[ dead link ] III 2009
MichiganMode of Amendment, by 12 StatesApril 4, 1956? Cong. Rec. Vol. 102, pp. 7240-7241 (HCR 8) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 7241 [ dead link ]IV
IdahoMode of Amendment, by 12 StatesApril 1, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103 pp. 4831-4832 (HCR 6) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4832 [ dead link ] IV 1999 [ dead link ]
IndianaMode of Amendment, by 12 StatesMarch 12, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6471-6472 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6472 [ dead link ]IV
IndianaLimited Treaty Powers, VariousMarch 12, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6472-6473 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 4") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6473 [ dead link ]III
IndianaProportional Electoral College, OtherMarch 12, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6473-6474 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 7") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6474 [ dead link ]III
IndianaRepeal of Constitution's 16th AmendmentMarch 12, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6474-6475 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6475 [ dead link ]III
IndianaBalanced Budget, Other
Balanced Budget, Other
March 12, 1957?
January 26, 1976?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, pp. 6475-6476 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution 9") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6476 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 931 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ]
III
III
FloridaSupreme Court Review, OtherJune 5, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, p. 12787 (SCR 116) [ dead link ] III 2010
AlabamaJudicial Term LimitsJune 25, 1957? Cong. Rec. Vol. 103, p. 10863 (SJR 47) [ dead link ]III
ConnecticutProhibit Interstate Income TaxMay 6, 1958? Cong. Rec. Vol. 104, pp. 8085-8086 (SJR 9) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8086 [ dead link ]III
AlabamaLimited Federal PreemptionJanuary 1, 1959? Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 3083 (SJR 2) [ dead link ]III
WyomingLimit Federal PowersFebruary 26, 1959? Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, pp. 3085-3086 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3086 [ dead link ] III 2009
ArkansasValidity of 14th AmendmentMarch 18, 1959? Cong. Rec. Vol. 105, p. 4398 (HCR 24) [ dead link ]III
NevadaLimit Federal PowersMarch 11, 1960? Cong. Rec. Vol. 106, p. 10749 (SJR 7) [ dead link ]III
LouisianaLimit Federal PowersJune 11, 1960? Cong. Rec. Vol. 106, p. 14401 (HCR 22) [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
ArkansasSupreme Court Review, OtherFebruary 2, 1961? Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 2154 (HCR 14) [ dead link ]III
WyomingBalanced Budget, Other
Balanced Budget, Emergency
February 21, 1961?
February 8, 1979?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 2759 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 4") [ dead link ]
CR V.125 p.2116 [ dead link ]
III 2009
IV 2009
GeorgiaSupreme Court Review, OtherMarch 9, 1961? Cong. Rec. Vol. 107, p. 4715 (SR 39) [ dead link ] III 2004 [ dead link ]
South CarolinaLimit Federal PowersMarch 11, 1962? Cong. Rec. Vol. 108, p. 5051 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] III 2004
OklahomaMode of Amendment, Identical TextJanuary 21, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 1172 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution 2") [ dead link ] III 2009
OklahomaApportionment of Legislature, IJanuary 21, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 1172-1173 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution 3") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 1173 [ dead link ] III 2009
KansasMode of Amendment, Identical TextJanuary 31, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (SCR 3) [ dead link ] III 1970 [ dead link ]
KansasApportionment of Legislature, IJanuary 31, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (SCR 4) [ dead link ] III 1970 [ dead link ]
FloridaSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionFebruary 5, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 2071-2072 ("Senate Memorial 12-X(63)" [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2072 [ dead link ] III 2010
FloridaMode of Amendment, Identical TextFebruary 5, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2072 ("Senate Memorial 13-X(63)" [ dead link ] III 2010
IdahoApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
February 14, 1963?
January 26, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2281 (SJM 4) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 1229 (SJM 1) [ dead link ]
III 1999 [ dead link ]
III 1999 [ dead link ]
ArkansasMode of Amendment, Identical TextFebruary 21, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2768 (HJR 2) [ dead link ]III
ArkansasSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionFebruary 21, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 2768-2769 (HJR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2769 [ dead link ]III
ArkansasApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
February 21, 1963?
April 5, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (HJR 4) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 6917-6918 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6918 [ dead link ]
III
III
ArkansasProportional Electoral College, OtherFebruary 21, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 2769 (HJR 12) [ dead link ]III
South DakotaProportional Electoral College, OtherMarch 11, 1963? CR V.109 p.3982 [ dead link ]??
MontanaApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
March 11, 1963?
February 17, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3854 (SJR 15) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 2777 ("A Joint Resolution") [ dead link ]
III 2007 [ dead link ]
III 2007 [ dead link ]
IdahoBalanced Budget, OtherMarch 11, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 3855 ("SJM 9") [ dead link ] III 1999 [ dead link ]
MontanaProportional Electoral College, IMarch 25, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4469 ("HJR 13") [ dead link ] III 2007 [ dead link ]
WyomingSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionFebruary 14, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109 pp. 4778-4779 ("Enrolled Joint Resolution 2") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 4779 [ dead link ] III 2009
WyomingApportionment of Legislature, IFebruary 9, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4779 ("Enrolled Joint Memorial 14") [ dead link ] III 2009
WyomingMode of Amendment, Identical TextFebruary 15, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 4779 ("Enrolled Joint Memorial 15") [ dead link ] III 2009
AlabamaSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionMarch 13, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5250 (HJR 13) [ dead link ]III
WashingtonApportionment of Legislature, IMarch 30, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5867 (HJM 1) [ dead link ]III
MissouriApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
April 8, 1963?
February 22, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5868 (HCR 4) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3304 (HCR 2) [ dead link ]
III
III
MissouriMode of Amendment, Identical TextApril 8, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5868 (HCR 5) [ dead link ]III
UtahProportional Electoral College, IApril 8, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 5947 (HCR 1) [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
ColoradoProportional Electoral College, IApril 11, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 6659 (HJM 4) [ dead link ]III
ColoradoIncome Tax, Limit OtherApril 25, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 7060 (SJM 9) [ dead link ]III
NevadaApportionment of Legislature, IFebruary 12, 1963?
February 17, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 9942 (SJR 2) [ dead link ]III
South CarolinaApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
June 10, 1963?
February 18, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10441 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3304 ("Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ]
III 2004
South CarolinaApportionment of Legislature, IJune 10, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10442 (SCR 149) [ dead link ] III 2004
South CarolinaMode of Amendment, Identical TextJune 10, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10441 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] III 2004
South CarolinaMode of Amendment, Identical TextJune 10, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 10442 (SCR 148) [ dead link ] III 2004
South CarolinaSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionJune 10, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 10441-10442 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10442 [ dead link ] III 2004
South CarolinaSupreme Court Review, Court of the UnionJune 10, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 10442-10443 (SCR 147) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10443 [ dead link ] III 2004
TexasApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
April 4, 1963?
July 26, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 11852 (HCR 22) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 18171 (SCR 24) [ dead link ]
(II) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
(II) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
TexasProportional Electoral College, IMay 22, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, pp. 11852-11853 (HCR 29) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11853 [ dead link ](II) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
South DakotaApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
March 2, 1963?
March 1, 1965?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 14639 (SJR 2) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol.111, pp.3722-3723 ("Joint resolution") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3723 [ dead link ]
III 2010
III
WisconsinProportional Electoral College, IMarch 2, 1963? Cong. Rec. Vol. 109, p. 14808 (Resolution Number Not Provided) [ dead link ]III
VirginiaApportionment of Legislature, I
Apportionment of Legislature, II
March 15, 1964?
December 3, 1964?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 5659 (HJR 90) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 880-881 (HJR 6) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 881 [ dead link ]
III
III 2004
MassachusettsSchool Management, OtherMarch 18, 1964? Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 7616 (Unnumbered resolution) appearing to have been approved only by the Massachusetts House of Representativesand NOT at all by the Massachusetts Senate[ dead link ]III
MassachusettsSenior PensionsApril 23, 1964? Cong. Rec. Vol. 110, p. 9875 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ]III
VirginiaMode of Amendment, Identical TextDecember 3, 1964? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 880 (HJR 5) [ dead link ]III 2004
LouisianaSchool Management, States' RightJanuary 6, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 164-165 (SCR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 165 [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
ArizonaApportionment of Legislature, IIFebruary 18, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 3061 (HCM 1) [ dead link ] III 2003 [ dead link ]
KansasApportionment of Legislature, IIJanuary 27, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 3061-3062 (SCR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3062 [ dead link ] III 1970 [ dead link ]
South CarolinaSchool Management, States' RightFebruary 18, 1965? CR V.111 p.3304 [ dead link ] III 2004
UtahApportionment of Legislature, IIMarch 8, 1965? CR V.111 p.4320 [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
MarylandApportionment of Legislature, IIMarch 25, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 5820 (SJR 1) [ dead link ]III
North CarolinaApportionment of Legislature, IIMay 17, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 10673 ("Resolution 60") [ dead link ] III 1969-Not Joint [ dead link ]
MinnesotaApportionment of Legislature, IIMay 17, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 10673 ("Resolution 5") [ dead link ]III
OklahomaProportional Electoral College, IMay 12, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 11488 (SCR 35) [ dead link ] also found at Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 11802-11803 ("Enrolled Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 35") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11803 [ dead link ] III 2009
LouisianaApportionment of Legislature, IIJune 1, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 12110 (SCR 25) [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
New HampshireApportionment of Legislature, IIJune 8, 1965? CR V.111 p.12853 [ dead link ] III 2010
IllinoisRevenue Sharing, OtherJune 9, 1965? CR V.111 p.14144 [ dead link ]III
FloridaApportionment of Legislature, IIJune 22, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 14308 (HM 2433) [ dead link ] III 2010
MississippiApportionment of Legislature, IIJuly 7, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 15769 ("S. Con. Res. 101") [ dead link ]III
MississippiSchool Management, States' RightJuly 7, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 15769-15770 ("S. Con. Res. 102") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 15770 [ dead link ]III
MississippiAnti-SubversionJuly 7, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 15770 ("H. Con. Res. 14") [ dead link ]III
IllinoisApportionment of Legislature, II
Apportionment of Legislature, Other
June 22, 1965
March 13, 1967
Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 19379 ("Senate Resolution No. 52" and unicameral--not likewise approved by Illinois House of Representatives) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 8004 (HJR 32) [ dead link ]
III 1969-Not Joint
III[ dead link ]
NebraskaProportional Electoral College, IAugust 10, 1965? CR V.111 p.19775 [ dead link ]III
NebraskaApportionment of Legislature, ISeptember 22, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 24723 ("Legislative Resolution") [ dead link ]III
OhioRevenue Sharing, OtherSeptember 28, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, p. 25237 (SJR 16) [ dead link ]III
KentuckyApportionment of Legislature, IIOctober 6, 1965? Cong. Rec. Vol. 111, pp. 26073-26074 ("Senate" Concurrent "Resolution 8") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 26074 [ dead link ]III
AlabamaApportionment of Legislature, IIJanuary 14, 1966? Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, pp. 200-201 (SJR 3) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 201 [ dead link ]III
New MexicoApportionment of Legislature, IIJanuary 14, 1966? Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, p. 199 (SJR 2) [ dead link ]III
TennesseeApportionment of Legislature, IIJanuary 14, 1966? Cong. Rec. Vol. 112, p. 199-200 (HJR 34) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 200 [ dead link ] III 2010
IllinoisApportionment of Legislature, OtherMarch 13, 1967 Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 8004 (HJR 32) [ dead link ]III
IndianaApportionment of Legislature, IIMarch 13, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 6384 ("House Enrolled Concurrent Resolution No. 58") [ dead link ]III
AlabamaRevenue Sharing, OtherApril 19, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, pp. 10117-10118 ("Resolution No. 11") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 10118 [ dead link ]III
North DakotaApportionment of Legislature, OtherApril 28, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 11175 (HCR I-1) [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
GeorgiaRevenue Sharing, OtherMay 4, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, pp. 11743-11744 ("Resolution 96") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11744 [ dead link ] III 2004 [ dead link ]
TexasRevenue Sharing, OtherJune 28, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 17634 (SCR 12) [ dead link ](III) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
IllinoisRevenue Sharing, OtherJune 28, 1967? Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 17634-17635 (SJR 63) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 17635 [ dead link ] III 1969-Not Joint [ dead link ]
IowaApportionment of Legislature, OtherMay 13, 1969? Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 12249 (SCR 13) [ dead link ]III
FloridaRevenue Sharing, OtherSeptember 3, 1969? Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 24116 (SM 397) [ dead link ] III 2010
New HampshireRevenue Sharing, IDecember 1, 1969? Cong. Rec. Vol. 115, p. 36153-36154 ("Concurrent resolution..." [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 36154 [ dead link ] III 2010
MississippiSchool Management, Other
School Management, No Assignment
March 5, 1970?
March 15, 1973?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 113, p. 6097 (SCR 514) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8089 (HCR 55) [ dead link ]
III
IV
LouisianaAnti-SubversionJune 22, 1970? Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, pp. 20672-20673 (HCR 4-A) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 20673 [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
LouisianaIncome Tax, Limit OtherJuly 7, 1970? Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 22906 (SCR 25) [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
LouisianaRevenue Sharing, OtherJuly 10, 1970? Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 23765 (HCR 270) [ dead link ] III 1990 [ dead link ]
New JerseyRevenue Sharing, IDecember 16, 1970? Cong. Rec. Vol. 116, p. 41879 (SCR 77) [ dead link ]IV
West VirginiaRevenue Sharing, IJanuary 26, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, pp. 541-542 (HCR 9) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 542 [ dead link ]IV
MassachusettsRevenue Sharing, IMarch 4, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 5020 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ]IV
South DakotaRevenue Sharing, IMarch 8, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 5303 (HJR 503) [ dead link ]IV
North DakotaRevenue Sharing, IApril 26, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 11841 (SCR 4013) [ dead link ] IV 2001 [ dead link ]
LouisianaRevenue Sharing, IJune 15, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, pp. 19801-19802 (SCR 138) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 19802 [ dead link ] IV 1990 [ dead link ]
OhioRevenue Sharing, IJune 28, 1971? Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 22280 ("Joint Resolution") [ dead link ]IV
DelawareRevenue Sharing, IFebruary 18, 1971? CR V.117 p.3175 [ dead link ] ?? 2016 [ dead link ]
OregonRevenue Sharing, IMay 24, 1971? CR V.117 p.16574 [ dead link ]??
MassachusettsSchool Management, Other
School Management, Other
September 8, 1971?
March 28, 1973?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 117, p. 30905 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ]
CR Vol. 119, pp. 12408-12409 (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 12409 [ dead link ]
IV
IV
MichiganSchool Management, No AssignmentNovember 16, 1971? CR V.117 pp.41598-41599 (SCR 172) Printed in "Extensions of Remarks" portion of Congressional Record [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 41599 [ dead link ]IV
IowaRevenue Sharing, IMarch 2, 1972? Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, pp. 6501-6502 (HJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 6502 [ dead link ]IV
FloridaSenate Control of Presiding OfficerApril 4, 1972? Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, p. 11444 (SM 227) [ dead link ] IV 2010
ArizonaSchool Management, PrayerApril 4, 1972? Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, p. 11445 (HCR 2009) [ dead link ] III 2003 [ dead link ]
TennesseeSchool management, No AssignmentMay 8, 1972? CR V.118 p.16214 [ dead link ] ?? 2010
New YorkSchool Management, OtherOctober 2, 1972? Cong. Rec. Vol. 118, pp. 33047-33048 ("Joint Resolution No. 7) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 33048 [ dead link ]IV
VirginiaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 15, 1973?
March 10, 1975?
March 29, 1976?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8091 (HJR 75) [ dead link ]
CR Vol. 121, p. 5793 (SJR 107) [ dead link ]
CR Vol. 122, pp. 8335-8336 (SJR 36) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 8336 [ dead link ]
IV
III
IV 2004
MississippiPrayer in Public BuildingsMarch 20, 1973? Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 8689 (HCR 14) [ dead link ]IV
VirginiaSchool management, No AssignmentApril 3, 1973? CR V.119 p.10675 [ dead link ]?? 2004
New JerseySchool Management, OtherApril 9, 1973? CR V.119 p.11446 [ dead link ]??
TexasSchool Management, No AssignmentApril 10, 1973? Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 11515 ("House Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ](IV) 2017 TX 85th Legislature SJR 38
OklahomaSchool Management, No AssignmentApril 25, 1973? Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, p. 14428 (HCR 1026) [ dead link ] III 2009
MarylandSchool Management, OtherMay 7, 1973? CR V.119 p.14421 [ dead link ]??
NevadaSchool Management, No AssignmentMay 29, 1973? Cong. Rec. Vol. 119, pp. 17022-17023 (SJR 7) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 17023 [ dead link ]IV
New HampshireSchool Management, OtherJune 5, 1973? CR V.119 p.18190 [ dead link ] ?? 2010
ArkansasBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 10, 1975?
March 8, 1979?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 5793 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution") [ dead link ]
CR Vol. 125, p. 4372, POM-78 (HJR 1) [ dead link ]
III
IV
North DakotaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 11, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 9782, POM-205 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4018) The wording of S.C.R. No. 4018 is extremely poor anddepending upon interpretationit might not even be a valid Article V Convention call II 2001 [ dead link ]
MississippiBalanced Federal BudgetApril 29, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, pp. 12175-12176 (HCR 51) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 12176 [ dead link ]III
MissouriRight to Life, VariousMay 5, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 12867 (SCR 7) [ dead link ]III
NevadaLimited Funding Mandates, VariousJune 26, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 21065 (AJR 47) [ dead link ]III
LouisianaBalanced Federal BudgetJuly 28, 1975?
February 8, 1979?
July 19, 1979?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 25312 (SCR 109) [ dead link ]
CR V.125 p.2110-1 [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 19470-19471, POM-394 (SCR 4) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 19471 [ dead link ]
III 1990 [ dead link ]
IV 1990 [ dead link ]
V 1990 [ dead link ]
KentuckySchool Management, No AssignmentSeptember 8, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 27821 ("House" Joint "Resolution No. 29") [ dead link ]III
AlabamaBalanced Federal BudgetSeptember 10, 1975? Cong. Rec. Vol. 121, p. 28347 (HJR 105) [ dead link ] IV 1989 [ dead link ]
GeorgiaBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 6, 1976? Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 2740 (HR 469-1267) [ dead link ] IV 2004 [ dead link ]
DelawareBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 25, 1976? Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 4329 (HCR 36) [ dead link ] IV 2016 [ dead link ]
South CarolinaBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 25, 1976?
February 8, 1979?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 4329 (Numerically Undesignated Resolution) [ dead link ]
CR V.125 p.2114 [ dead link ]
IV 2004
IV 2004
MassachusettsSchool Management, No AssignmentApril 7, 1976? Cong. Rec. Vol. 122, p. 9735, (Unnumbered resolution) [ dead link ]III
OklahomaLimited Funding Mandates, VariousJune 7, 1976? CR V.122 p.16814 [ dead link ]III
LouisianaRight to Life, VariousJuly 22, 1976? CR V.122 p.23550 [ dead link ] IV 1990 [ dead link ]
AlabamaBalanced Federal BudgetAugust 18, 1976? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4861, POM-91 (House Joint Resolution No. 227)
DelawareRight to Life, VariousJanuary 1, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 17055, POM-687 (House Concurrent Resolution No. 9) III 2016 [ dead link ]
MarylandBalanced Federal BudgetJanuary 28, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 2545-2546, POM-59 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 4also known as "Resolution No. 77") [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 2546 [ dead link ] IV 2017
VirginiaLine Item Veto, VariousMarch 28, 1977? CR V.123 p.9289 (1977 House Joint Resolution No. 168) [ dead link ]?? 2004
New JerseyRight to Life, VariousApril 5, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 10481, POM-124 ("Senate No. 1271") [ dead link ]IV
South DakotaRight to Life, Unborn
Right to Life, Sacred Life
April 18, 1977?
April 18, 1980?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 11048, POM-135 (HJR 503) [ dead link ] IV 2010
UtahRight to Life, VariousMay 2, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 13057-13058, POM-151 (HJR 28) [ dead link ] remainder of text p.13058 [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
ArkansasRight to Life, VariousMay 20, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 15808-15809, POM-189 (HJR 2) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 15809 [ dead link ]IV
Rhode IslandRight to Life, VariousMay 20, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, p. 15809, POM-190 ("Resolution") [ dead link ]IV
TexasBalanced Federal BudgetMay 30, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 5223-5224, POM-95 (HCR 31) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 5224 [ dead link ]IV
ArizonaBalanced Federal BudgetJune 14, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 123, pp. 18873-18874, POM-231 (HCM 2003) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 18874 [ dead link ] III 2003 [ dead link ]
OregonBalanced Federal BudgetJune 16, 1977? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 5953, POM-104 (Senate Joint Memorial No. 2) IV 2000 [ dead link ]
MassachusettsRight to Life, VariousJune 23, 1977? CR V.123 p.20659 [ dead link ]??
IndianaRight to Life, VariousJuly 22, 1977? CR V.123 p.4797 [ dead link ]
DelawareAppointment and Tenure of Federal JudgesJanuary 1, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 2193, POM-453 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 79) III 2016 [ dead link ]
ColoradoBalanced Federal BudgetApril 5, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 8778, POM-579 (Senate Joint Memorial No. 1) V
NebraskaRight to Life, VariousApril 21, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 12694, POM-637 (Legislative Resolution No. 152) [ dead link ]IV
TennesseeJudicial Term LimitsApril 25, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 11437, POM-612 (HJR 21) [ dead link ] III 2010
TennesseeBalanced Federal BudgetApril 25, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, pp. 11437-11438, POM-613 (HJR 22) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 11438 [ dead link ] III 2010
PennsylvaniaRight to Life, VariousApril 25, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 11438, POM-614 (House Bill No. 71--described as a "Joint Resolution") [ dead link ]IV
OklahomaBalanced Federal BudgetMay 3, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 12397 (POM-629) (HJR 1049) [ dead link ] IV 2009 [ dead link ]
KansasBalanced Federal BudgetMay 19, 1978? Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, p. 14584, POM-657 (SCR 1661) [ dead link ]IV
LouisianaBalanced Federal BudgetJuly 14, 1978?[Cong. Rec. Vol. 124, pp. 20911-20912, POM-739 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 73)]
North CarolinaBalanced Federal BudgetJanuary 29, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 1923, POM-37 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 1also known as Resolution No. 5) ??
MississippiRight to Life, VariousFebruary 26, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3196, POM-49 (HCR 3) [ dead link ]IV
FloridaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 1, 1979?
June 21, 1988?
Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3655, POM-59 ("Senate Memorial" No. 234) [ dead link ]
Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 3655-3656, POM-60 (HM 2801) remainder of text p. 3656
Cong. Rec. Vol. 134, p. 15363, POM-549 (SM 302) [ dead link ]
IV 1988 [ dead link ]
VI 2010
IdahoBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 1, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3657, POM-64 (HCR 7) [ dead link ] V 1999 [ dead link ]
New MexicoBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 1, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 3656-3657, POM-62 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] remainder of text p. 3657 [ dead link ]IV
South DakotaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 1, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 3656, POM-61 (SJR 1) [ dead link ] V 2010
NebraskaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 7, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4152, POM-67 (Legislative Resolution No. 106) [ dead link ]IV
GeorgiaRight to Life, VariousMarch 8, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4372, POM-79 (House Resolution No. 254) The wording of H.R. No. 254 indicates that it was adopted only by the Georgia House of Representativestherefore, it cannot be a valid Article V Convention call[ dead link ] IV 2004 [ dead link ]
UtahBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 8, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 4372-4373, POM-80 (HJR 12) [ dead link ] III 2001 [ dead link ]
ArizonaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 9, 1979 Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, pp. 7920-7921, POM-149 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 1002) III 2003 [ dead link ]
PennsylvaniaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 12, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 4627-4628, POM-85 (House Concurrent "Resolution No. 236") [ dead link ]IV
ArizonaRepeal Constitution's 16th Amendment and Prohibit Federal Government from Engaging in Business, Professional, Commercial, Financial or Industrial EnterprisesApril 18, 1979 Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 122201 POM-244 (House Joint Memorial No. 2001) V
IndianaBalanced Federal BudgetMay 1, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 9188, POM-192 ("Senate Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 8") [ dead link ]IV
New HampshireBalanced Federal BudgetMay 16, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125 p. 11584, POM-223 (HCR 8) [ dead link ] IV 2010
IowaBalanced Federal BudgetJune 18, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 15227, POM-301 (SJR 1) [ dead link ]IV
NevadaRight to Life, VariousJune 25, 1979? Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 16350, POM-312 (SJR 27) [ dead link ]V
LouisianaFederal Executive Branch Rules and RegulationsJuly 17, 1979?[Cong. Rec. Vol. 125, p. 18954, POM-383 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 105)] ?? 1990 [ dead link ]
NevadaBalanced Federal BudgetJanuary 29, 1980? Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, pp. 1104-1105, POM-535 (SJR 8) remainder of text p. 1105 III
V 1989-Not Joint
IdahoRight to Life, VariousMarch 21, 1980? Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 6172, POM-602 (SCR 132) V 1999
ArizonaCoercive use of Federal FundsApril 17, 1980 Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 11389, POM-730, (House Concurrent Resolution No. 2001) III 2003
OklahomaRight to Life, VariousApril 24, 1980? Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 8972, POM-701 (HJR 1053) IV 2009
TennesseeRight to Life, VariousMay 2, 1980? Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 9765, POM-712 (SJR 23) IV 2010
AlabamaRight to Life, VariousMay 8, 1980? Cong. Rec. Vol. 126, p. 10650, POM-717 (SJR 9) IV
AlabamaRequire Federal Judges to be elected, or re-elected, every six years, rather than to be appointedAugust 13, 1981 Cong. Rec. Vol. 127, p. 20491 as well as p. 21684, POM-416 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 41) V
AlaskaBalanced Federal BudgetJanuary 18, 1982? Cong. Rec. Vol. 128, p. 2278 as well as p. 5643, POM-706 (House Joint Resolution No. 17—also designated as Legislative Resolve No. 1) V
MissouriBalanced Federal BudgetJuly 21, 1983? Cong. Rec. Vol. 129, p. 20352, POM-323 (SCR 3) V
ArizonaLine Item Veto, VariousJune 5, 1984? Cong. Rec. Vol. 130, p. 15611, POM-684 (SCR 1008) III 2003
South DakotaLine Item Veto, VariousMarch 12, 1986? Cong. Rec. Vol. 132, pp. 4473-4474, POM-599, (Senate Joint Resolution No. 4) remainder of text p. 4474 V 2010
UtahIncome Tax, Limit OtherFebruary 23, 1987 Cong. Rec. Vol. 133, p. 9736, POM-94 (SJR 8) III 2001
South DakotaTerm Limits on Members of CongressApril 4, 1989? Cong. Rec. Vol. 135, pp. 5395-5396, POM-42 (HJR 1001) remainder of text p. 5396 IV 2010
GeorgiaFlag DesecrationApril 16, 1991? Cong. Rec. Vol. 137, pp. 8085-8086, POM-26 (House "Resolution No. 105") remainder of text p. 8086 IV 2004
ColoradoLimited Funded Mandates, VariousJune 26, 1992? Cong. Rec. Vol. 138, p. 16552, POM-428 (SJM 92-3) V
South DakotaLimited Funded Mandates, VariousMarch 22, 1993? Cong. Rec. Vol. 139, p. 5905, POM-50 (SJR 3) V 2010
MissouriNo Judicial Taxing PowerJune 29, 1993? Cong. Rec. Vol. 139, p. 14565, POM-175 (SCR 9) V
DelawareIncome Tax, Limit OtherJune 28, 1994? Cong. Rec. Vol. 140, p. 14718, POM-554 (HCR 56) IV 2016
MissouriLimited Funding Mandates, VariousJune 29, 1994? Cong. Rec. Vol. 140, pp. 15072-15073, POM-575 (SCR 21) remainder of text p. 15073 V
ArizonaNo Judicial Taxing PowerMarch 27, 1996? Cong. Rec. Vol. 142, pp. S3012-S3013, POM-523 (SCR 1014) remainder of text p. S3013 III 2003
South DakotaNo Judicial Taxing PowerMarch 27, 1996? Cong. Rec. Vol. 142, p. S3013, POM-526 (HCR 1010) III
NevadaTerm Limits on Members of CongressJune 29, 1996? Nevada Constitution III
North DakotaNo Judicial Taxing PowerApril 6, 2001? Cong. Rec. Vol. 147, pp. S3704-S3705, POM-7 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 3031") remainder of text p. S3705 III
LouisianaPosse ComitatusApril 29, 2008? Cong. Rec. Vol. 154, p. S3504, POM-329 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 38") IV
FloridaBalanced Federal BudgetApril 19, 2010 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S5563-S5564, POM-323 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution 10") remainder of text p. S5564 V
NebraskaBalanced Federal Budget (Reaffirmation of 1976 Legislative Resolution No. 106)April 13, 2010 "Legislative Resolution No. 538" V
North DakotaMode of Amendment, OtherApril 14, 2011 "House Concurrent Resolution No. 3048" V
North DakotaIncrease in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislaturesApril 11, 2011 Cong. Rec. Vol. 158, p. S1459, POM-66 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4007") IV
AlabamaBalanced Federal BudgetJune 1, 2011 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S3666-S3667, POM-251 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 100") remainder of text p. S3667 V
LouisianaIncrease in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislaturesJune 21, 2011 Cong. Rec. Vol. 158, p. S2241, POM-69 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 87") IV
New HampshireBalanced Federal BudgetMay 16, 2012 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5153, POM-197 ("House Concurrent Resolution 40") V
OhioBalanced Federal BudgetNovember 20, 2013 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S1174, POM-197 Senate Joint Resolution No. 5 also known as simply "Joint Resolution No. 5") V
GeorgiaBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 20, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, pp. S3667-S3668, POM-254 ("Senate Resolution 371") remainder of text p. S3668 V
GeorgiaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMarch 6, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4332, POM-285 ("Senate Resolution No. 736") V
MichiganBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 26, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S2098, POM-14 ("Enrolled Senate Joint Resolution V") V
TennesseeBalanced Federal BudgetApril 9, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, p. S5406, POM-128 ("House Joint Resolution No. 548") V
AlaskaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressApril 19, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S6021, POM-345 ("House Joint Resolution 22", also referred to as "Legislative Resolve No. 68") V
FloridaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressApril 21, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4332, POM-286 ("Senate Memorial 476") V
FloridaBalanced Federal BudgetApril 21, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4333, POM-288 ("Senate Memorial 658") V
FloridaLegislation in Congress to contain only one subject and that one subject must be clearly expressed in the measure's titleApril 23, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4333, POM-289 ("House Memorial 261") V
VermontRegulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission May 2, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S4331, POM-284 ("Joint Senate Resolution No. 27") V
LouisianaBalanced Federal BudgetMay 15, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S5563, POM-322 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 70") V
CaliforniaRegulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission June 23, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 160, p. S5507, POM-320 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 1") V
IllinoisRegulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission December 3, 2014 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S71, POM-126 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 42") V
South DakotaBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 17, 2015 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S6550, POM-255 ("House Joint Resolution No. 1001") V
New JerseyRegulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission February 23, 2015 "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 132" V
UtahBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 6, 2015 "House Joint Resolution No. 7" V
North DakotaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 24, 2015 Cong. Rec. Vol. 161, pp. S2399-S2400, POM-17 ("House Concurrent Resolution 3015") remainder of text p. S2400 V
AlabamaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [6] May 21, 2015 Cong. Rec. Vol. 161 pp. S8601-S8602, POM-124 ("House Joint Resolution 112") V
TennesseeFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressFebruary 4, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S6534, POM-117 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 67") V
FloridaTerm limits on Members of CongressFebruary 10, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S112, POM-6 ("House Memorial 417") V
IndianaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressFebruary 29, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S6663, POM-256 ("Senate Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 14") V
West VirginiaBalanced Federal BudgetMarch 12, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5277, POM-201 and POM-202 ("House Concurrent Resolution 36") V
AlaskaCountermand Amendment, which would allow states to propose initiatives that could repeal any federal statute, executive order, judicial decision, or regulatory decision if three-fifths of state legislatures approved. [7] [8] April 16, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, p. S703, POM-164 ("House Joint Resolution No. 14", also referred to as "Legislative Resolve No. 49") V
OklahomaCombination of: (1) Balanced Federal Budget; and (2) Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressApril 18, 2016 Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, pp. S6354-6355, POM-213 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 4") remainder of text p. S6355 V
LouisianaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMay 25, 2016 "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 52" V
Rhode IslandRegulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Rhode Island lawmakers chose to approve two separate unicameral resolutions, rather than to adopt a single bicameral resolution. The validity of this approach is subject to question).June 16, 2016 (R.I. House version) and June 17, 2016 (R.I. Senate version) Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, p. S5276, POM-198 (R 326H 7670) and Cong. Rec. Vol. 162, pp. S5276-S5277, POM-199 (R 327S 2589) remainder of text p. S5277 V
WyomingBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 27, 2017 "House Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 2" V
ArizonaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [9] [10] March 13, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, pp. S6534-S6535, POM-118 and POM-120 ("House Concurrent Resolution 2010") V
North DakotaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress [11] [12] March 24, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S2527, POM-16 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 3006") V
ArizonaBalanced Federal Budget [13] [14] March 27, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S6535, POM-119 and POM-121 ("House Concurrent Resolution 2013") V
TexasFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMay 10, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, p. S4056, POM-65 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 2") V
MissouriFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMay 12, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 163, pp. S3361-S3362, POM-40 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4") V
WisconsinBalanced Federal Budget [15] [16] November 7, 2017 Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, pp. S109-S110, POM-154 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 21") V
AlabamaTerm Limits on Members of CongressJanuary 25, 2018 Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, pp. S3759-S3760, POM-243 ("House Joint Resolution No. 23") V
MissouriTerm Limits on Members of Congress [17] May 17, 2018 Cong. Rec. Vol. 164, p. S5422, POM-278 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 40") V
ArkansasFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressFebruary 14, 2019 Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, pp. S5601-S5602, POM-138 and POM-139 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 3") V
UtahFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMarch 5, 2019 "Senate Joint Resolution No. 9" V
MississippiFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officialsbut specifically excluding the imposition of term limits upon members of CongressMarch 27, 2019 Cong. Rec. Vol. 165, p. S5447, POM-133 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 596") V
West VirginiaTerm Limits on Members of CongressMarch 22, 2021 Cong. Rec. Vol. 167, p. S4517, POM-18 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 9") V
OklahomaCombination of: (1) Balanced Federal Budget; and (2) Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress (reprising 2016 joint resolution numbered as "Senate Joint Resolution No. 4" which was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2023)April 20, 2021 Cong. Rec., Vol. 167, pages S6839 through S6841, POM-85 and POM-86 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 23") V
MissouriFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress (reprising 2017 concurrent resolution likewise numbered as "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4" which was scheduled to expire on the fifth anniversary of its adoptionthat being in 2022)May 13, 2021 Cong. Rec., Vol. 167, pp. S4770-S4771, POM-22 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4") V
WisconsinFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressJanuary 25, 2022 Cong. Rec. Vol. 168, p. S4618, POM-219 ("Assembly Joint Resolution No. 9"also known as "Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 9") V
NebraskaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressJanuary 28, 2022 Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, pp. S1117-S1118, POM-114 ("Legislative Resolution No. 14") V
WisconsinTerm Limits on Members of CongressFebruary 24, 2022 Cong. Rec. Vol. 168, pp. S4616-S4617, POM-216 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 102"also known as "Enrolled Joint Resolution No. 18") V
West VirginiaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMarch 4, 2022 Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, pp. S2336-S2337, POM-136 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 31") V
South CarolinaFiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of CongressMarch 29, 2022 Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, p. S3074, POM-155 ("H. 3205") V
MissouriTerm Limits on Members of Congress (reprising 2018 concurrent resolution numbered as "Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 40" which was scheduled to expire on the fifth anniversary of its adoptionthat being in 2023)May 10, 2022 Cong. Rec., Vol. 168, p. S4043, POM-185 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 25") V
OklahomaTerm Limits on Members of CongressApril 20, 2023 Cong. Rec., Vol. 169, p. S4755, POM-70 and POM-71 ("House Joint Resolution No. 1032") V
CaliforniaRegulation of Firearms; Raising Age to 21September 14, 2023 Cong. Rec., Vol. 170, pp. S72-S73, POM-92 ("Senate Joint Resolution No. 7") V
FloridaTerm Limits on Members of CongressFebruary 1, 2024 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 693") V
FloridaBalanced Federal BudgetFebruary 1, 2024 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 703") V
FloridaProhibit Congress from making any federal law applying to the general public that does not also equally apply to all U.S. Representatives, to all U.S. Senators, and to all other persons within the legislative branch of the federal governmentMarch 4, 2024 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 7055") V
FloridaGrant to President of the United States Line-Item Veto Authority within Federal Appropriations LegislationMarch 4, 2024 ("House Concurrent Resolution No. 7057") V
TennesseeTerm Limits on Members of CongressApril 11, 2024 Cong. Rec., Vol. 170, pp. S5188-S5189, POM-144 ("House Joint Resolution No. 5") V
LouisianaTerm Limits on Members of CongressMay 13, 2024 ("Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 2") V

Counts by states

In 1929 Wisconsin presented a list of states having made applications for a convention exceeding the two-thirds requirement that was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, with no further action. In 2013 states began listing existing state applications when joining them.

Wisconsin 1929

In 1929 Wisconsin applied to Congress to perform their constitutional duty to call a convention, listing Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin as states having made an application for a convention. There were 48 states in 1929, so 32 applications would be required to call a convention. 35 states were named.

Links to the text of applications by all states except California and North Carolina are provided in the table above. A reference to an application by California has been found in the Congressional Record and the text of an application by South Carolina is given in the table above. It may be that North Carolina was mistakenly included for South Carolina.

Three states, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin, had applied for a general convention. Eleven states listed had applied for a convention to prohibit polygamy (Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont, and Washington), plus South Carolina. Idaho had included the direct election of the President and Vice President with their request for direct election of Senators. Thus, 16 states clearly had outstanding applications.

Alabama and Georgia had outstanding issues from 1832 and 1833, making a less certain 18. Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Nevada, and Oklahoma would be added if we include class II requests for Direct Elections of Senators, for a total of 25.

The only known records for an application New York and Virginia are their ratification documents, before the Bill of Rights. New Jersey and Kentucky applied for a convention to prevent the Civil War, and class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. Arkansas, Maine, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah only had documented class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. California is most likely in this group. These ten states have applications that may have been mooted by amendments proposed by Congress.

Balanced budget

The balanced budget application of Ohio in 2013 through that of Arizona in 2017except North Dakotainclude a list of previous state applications for a balanced budget. Wisconsin's 2017 application also does not contain such a list. These lists mostly extend the previous lists, except possibly omitting state applications from the same legislative session.

Arizona has the most complete list, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. This represents 29 states.

Applications for all of the states mentioned above can be found in the list. Additionally, rescinded applications can be found for Delaware, Idaho, Oregon and Virginia. In particular, Delaware is included in lists prior to their rescission in 2016, but not after.

Wyoming and Wisconsin have made recent applications not included by Arizona, while Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado have recently rescinded their applications. This suggests a current total of 27 states, seven short of the required 34.

Convention of States Resolution

The Convention of States Resolution includes fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress.

A complete list of passed resolutions with vote summaries, filing dates, and related links can be found using the Convention of States website.

As of November 10, 2023, 19 of the 34 states needed have passed the resolution.

Wolf Pac Resolution

The Wolf Pac Resolution calls for regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Rhode Island included a count of the states in their 2016 application.

Rhode Island has the most complete list, including the following five states: California, Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont. All of these applications are included in the list, with no recent additions.

U.S. Term Limits

The U.S. Term Limits Resolution, campaigned for by US Term Limits, calls for a constitutional amendment limiting the terms of members of Congress. States passing applications are Florida in 2016, Alabama in 2018, Missouri in 2018 (reprised in 2022 to avert expiration), West Virginia in 2021, Wisconsin in 2022, Oklahoma in 2023, Tennessee in 2024, and Louisiana in 2024for a total of eight states to date.

Paulsen style application counts

Michael Stokes Paulsen holds that the applications for a convention alone should govern the convention. [18] Thus, this section contains counts of applications based on groupings not excluded by the applications themselves.

Counts including class IV, V, or VI applications would be limited to those with the same description and can be found by sorting the list by topic.

Class I and II applications

Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin have outstanding applications for a convention to propose amendments, with no accompanying issue.

Alabama has a request for a convention limiting tariffs, and South Carolina one for clarification on Amendment X, each implying that other amendments may be considered.

Class I, II, and III Applications

24 more states have outstanding class III applications. These are Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.

This gives a total of 31 states with known class I, II, or III applications. Three more applications would meet the 2/3rds requirement to call a convention.

Brennan style application counts

Thomas E. Brennan holds that, in 1982, it was necessary, desirable, and feasible to hold a convention. [19] He lists the following counts in the introduction to his claim:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Five of the United States Constitution</span> Description of amendment procedure

Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the procedure for altering the Constitution. Under Article Five, the process to alter the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments, and subsequent ratification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1913 amendment establishing the direct election of senators

The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state. The amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal Rights Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would, if added, explicitly prohibit sex discrimination. It was written by Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman and introduced in Congress in December 1923 as a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose of the ERA is to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. Proponents assert it would end legal distinctions between men and women in matters of divorce, property, employment, and other matters. Opponents originally argued it would remove protections that women needed. In the 21st century, opponents argue it is no longer needed and some disapprove of its potential effects on abortion and transgender rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1992 amendment delaying congressional salary changes

The Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution states that any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress may take effect only after the next election of the House of Representatives has occurred. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment</span> Proposed U.S. constitutional amendment

The District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would have given the District of Columbia full representation in the United States Congress, full representation in the Electoral College system, and full participation in the process by which the Constitution is amended. It would have also repealed the Twenty-third Amendment, which granted the District of Columbia the same number of electoral votes as that of the least populous state, but gave it no role in contingent elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corwin Amendment</span> Proposed US constitutional amendment to protect slavery from federal power

The Corwin Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that has never been adopted, but owing to the absence of a ratification deadline, could still be adopted by the state legislatures. It would have shielded slavery within the states from the federal constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child Labor Amendment</span> Proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendment allowing Congress to regulate child labor

The Child Labor Amendment is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution that would specifically authorize Congress to regulate "labor of persons under eighteen years of age". The amendment was proposed on June 2, 1924, following Supreme Court rulings in 1918 and 1922 that federal laws regulating and taxing goods produced by employees under the ages of 14 and 16 were unconstitutional.

A convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also referred to as an Article V Convention, state convention, or amendatory convention is one of two methods authorized by Article Five of the United States Constitution whereby amendments to the United States Constitution may be proposed: on the Application of two thirds of the State legislatures the Congress shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which become law only after ratification by three-fourths of the states. The Article V convention method has never been used; but 33 amendments have been proposed by the other method, a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress; and 27 of these have been ratified by three-fourths of the States. Although there has never been a federal constitutional convention since the original one, at the state level more than 230 constitutional conventions have assembled in the United States.

State ratifying conventions are one of the two methods established by Article V of the United States Constitution for ratifying proposed constitutional amendments. The only amendment that has been ratified through this method thus far is the 21st Amendment in 1933.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention (meeting)</span> Large gathering to discuss a common interest

A convention, in the sense of a meeting, is a gathering of individuals who meet at an arranged place and time in order to discuss or engage in some common interest. The most common conventions are based upon industry, profession, and fandom. Trade conventions typically focus on a particular industry or industry segment, and feature keynote speakers, vendor displays, and other information and activities of interest to the event organizers and attendees. Professional conventions focus on issues of concern along with advancements related to the profession. Such conventions are generally organized by societies or communities dedicated to promotion of the topic of interest. Fan conventions usually feature displays, shows, and sales based on pop culture and guest celebrities. Science fiction conventions traditionally partake of the nature of both professional conventions and fan conventions, with the balance varying from one to another. Conventions also exist for various hobbies, such as gaming or model railroads.

U.S. Term Limits (USTL) is a non-profit, non-partisan grassroots organization dedicated to enacting term limits for elected officials at every level of government in the United States. It was founded in 1992, and claims to have helped facilitate more than 500 successful term limits initiatives at various levels of government.

In the United States, term limits restrict the number of terms of office an officeholder may serve. At the federal level, the president of the United States can serve a maximum of two four-year terms, limited by the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Some state government offices are also term-limited, including executive, legislative, and judicial offices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Congressional Apportionment Amendment</span> Proposed amendment to the US Constitution pertaining to the number of Representatives in the House

The Congressional Apportionment Amendment is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that addresses the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It was proposed by Congress on September 25, 1789, but was never ratified by the requisite number of state legislatures. As Congress did not set a time limit for its ratification, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment is still pending before the states. As of 2024, it is one of six unratified amendments.

The calling of a Second Constitutional Convention of the United States is a proposal made by some academics and activists from across the political spectrum for the purpose of making substantive reforms to the federal government of the United States by rewriting the U.S. Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolf-PAC</span> American nonpartisan political action committee

Wolf-PAC is an American nonpartisan political action committee formed in 2011 with the goal of adding an "amendment to the United States Constitution to ensure balance, integrity, and transparency to our national system of campaign finance".

The proposed "Liberty" Amendment to the United States Constitution was first proffered, pursuant to the Constitution's Article V, for the consideration of the 82nd United States Congress on June 28, 1952, in the form of House Joint Resolution No. 491 by the late United States Representative Ralph W. Gwinn of New York.

References

  1. "Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives". clerk.house.gov.
  2. "U.S. Congressional Documents". memory.loc.gov.
  3. "Congress.gov | Library of Congress". www.congress.gov.
  4. Judge Bruce Van Sickle and attorney Lynn Boughey M. (Fall 1990). "A Lawful and Peaceful Revolution: Article V and Congress' Present Duty to Call a Convention for Proposing Amendments". Hamline Law Review, Volume 14, p. 1.
  5. Parrott, Ed A.; Monroe, James (20 March 1861). "Acts of the State of Ohio" (eBook). Google Books. Ohio. p. 181. Retrieved 10 November 2023. JOINT RESOLUTION, [paragraph break] Relative to requesting congress to call a convention of the several states of the Union. [paragraph break] Resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, That this general assembly does hereby make application to congress to call a convention for proposing amendments to the constitution of the United States, pursuant to the fifth article thereof. [paragraph break] Resolved, That the governor of this state be requested to communicate the above resolution to the president of the United States, with the request that he lay the same before congress.
  6. "Alabama HJR112 | 2015 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved 22 May 2024.
  7. "Alaska State Legislature". www.akleg.gov. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
  8. "Alaska State Legislature". www.akleg.gov. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
  9. "Bill Status Inquiry". apps.azleg.gov. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  10. "hcr2010.pdf" (PDF). azleg.gov. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
  11. "HCR 3006 - Overview | North Dakota Legislative Branch". ndlegis.gov. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  12. "HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 3006" (PDF). ndlegis.gov. Retrieved 21 June 2024.
  13. "Bill Status Inquiry". apps.azleg.gov. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  14. "hcr2013.pdf" (PDF). azleg.gov. Retrieved 22 June 2024.
  15. "2017 Assembly Joint Resolution 21". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  16. "Wisconsin Legislature: AJR21: Joint Resolution Text". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Retrieved 20 June 2024.
  17. "SCR40 - Applies to Congress for the calling of an Article V convention of states to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution regarding term limits for members of Congress". www.senate.mo.gov. Retrieved 14 May 2024.
  18. Paulson, Michael "A General Theory of Article V: The Constitutional Lessons of the Twenty-Seventh Amendment". Yale Law Journal 103: 677.
  19. Brennan, Thomas E., "Return to Philadelphia: A Case for Calling of an Amendatory Convention Under Article 5 of the Federal Constitution,'"1 Cooley Law Review 1 (1982).