Middle management

Last updated

Middle management is the intermediate management level of a hierarchical organization that is subordinate to the executive management and responsible for "team leading" line managers and/or "specialist" line managers. Middle management is indirectly (through line management) responsible for junior staff performance and productivity. [1]

Contents

Unlike line management, middle management is considered to be a senior (or semi-executive) position as middle managers are authorised to speak and act on behalf of the organisation to line managers, junior staff and customers. Included in this level of management are division, plant and department managers. [2]

A 2023 study in the American Journal of Sociology found that middle management has increased over time and that the role of middle management increasingly revolves around the task of collaboration rather than supervision. [3]

Role in an organization

Functions of a middle manager

A middle manager is a link between the senior management and the lower (junior) levels of the organization. Due to involvement into day-to-day running of a business, middle managers have the opportunity to report valuable information and suggestions from the inside of an organization. [4] They are in charge of putting into practice guidelines established previously in the strategic plans by top level managers. [2] Moreover, the middle manager is a channel of communication within the organization, as they pass on major decisions of executives and the main goals of an organization to lower levels of employees. This contributes to better coordination between workers and makes a company more united. [5]

The primary responsibility of a middle manager is to implement a strategy, created by the executive level, in the most efficient way possible. In order to reach the target goals, a manager may adjust and interpret the initial plan. [6] Other functions can be divided into three main categories: [7]

Middle managers are in charge of facilitating any changes needed in an organization and creating an effective working environment. They administer day-to-day routines, monitor performance and make sure everything is done in compliance with organization's needs. [8]

One of the most important functions of a middle manager is motivating, leading and inspiring their subordinates. This also includes building a team and supporting any team member when necessary.

Strategic functions involve analyzing a subordinate group in terms of productivity and financial effectiveness, creating a strategy of improving the current situation and reporting to the executive management in the form of attending a boardroom meeting or a discussion.

Competencies

A number of competencies are critical to become an effective middle manager.

Middle manager vs. line manager

A middle management position is often mistakenly described as a similar to the line management one. However, there are some differences: [7]

Criticism

The role of middle management is subjected to a number of criticisms. This position is often seen as unnecessary and middle managers are blamed for holding back the organization from achieving its full potential and using the influence for their own purposes.

Influence

Middle management is often accused of possessing too much influence. Their central position in an organization allows them to influence strategy and actions in "both upward and downward direction". [6] When supplying information to the executive level, middle managers interpret it subjectively and may insinuate it with their own opinion and evaluation. [10] Further, proximity to the boardroom makes it easy for the manager to promote their own interests, by "synthesizing" the information and presenting data from a certain strategic perspective. [11] The same level of influence can be exploited by a middle manager towards the lower staff. Driven by the reasons of maintaining a reputation, strengthening the power and influence, middle manager may introduce company's major strategic decisions in a light beneficial way for their designs. [12]

Resistance

Middle managers' reluctance to lose control in their teams and satisfaction with a settled situation could lead to their resistance in any changes in the strategy or direction of an organization. Usually, the resistance does not take an aggressive form such as refusal to carry out tasks or unconcealed confrontation, but result in a lack of support and eagerness to convey only those tasks, impact of which is clearly visible to the top management. [13] This creates barriers to a growth of a company and lags the overall working process.

Necessity

The overall necessity of middle managers in an organization is questioned. They are said to be too costly, non-effective and constantly under-performing employees. It has been stated[ by whom? ] that middle managers do not carry out their main duties of linking the organization and reporting effectively, which leads to a block of communication between different levels of staff. [14] Thus, as rapid growth of globalization put pressures on businesses in terms of cost effectiveness and speed of information flow within the organization, middle management make companies less flexible and competitive. [15]

Future

Development of information technology enabled an increase in the span of control and reduced the need for middle management. Moreover, an increasingly big number of modern organizations become flatter and downsized in the pursuit of flexibility, higher competitiveness and innovation. According to David Williams, flat organizations promote greater intercommunication and efficiency of the workers. [16] As a result, many organizations are being restructured, middle management is being reduced and their roles are thought to be out-dated and unnecessary.

At the same time, there is still a need in a middle manager as an employee and they continue playing a significant role in organizations, specifically in setting an overall strategy and targets. [17] Changes in the global market forced them to become more flexible, stress-resistant, acquire new skills.

Related Research Articles

Management is the administration of organizations, whether they are a business, a nonprofit organization, or a government body through business administration, nonprofit management, or the political science sub-field of public administration respectively. It is the process of managing the resources of businesses, governments, and other organizations.

A chief executive officer (CEO) is the highest officer charged with the management of an organization – especially a company or nonprofit institution.

A performance appraisal, also referred to as a performance review, performance evaluation, (career) development discussion, or employee appraisal, sometimes shortened to "PA", is a periodic and systematic process whereby the job performance of an employee is documented and evaluated. This is done after employees are trained about work and settle into their jobs. Performance appraisals are a part of career development and consist of regular reviews of employee performance within organizations.

Senior management, executive management, or upper management is an occupation at the highest level of management of an organization, performed by individuals who have the day-to-day tasks of managing the organization, sometimes a company or a corporation.

A chief operating officer (COO) is an executive in charge of the daily operations of an organization, i.e., personnel, resources, and logistics. COOs are usually second-in-command immediately after the CEO, and reports directly to them and acts on their behalf in their absence.

Human resource management is the strategic and coherent approach to the effective and efficient management of people in a company or organization such that they help their business gain a competitive advantage. It is designed to maximize employee performance in service of an employer's strategic objectives. Human resource management is primarily concerned with the management of people within organizations, focusing on policies and systems. HR departments are responsible for overseeing employee-benefits design, employee recruitment, training and development, performance appraisal, and reward management, such as managing pay and employee benefits systems. HR also concerns itself with organizational change and industrial relations, or the balancing of organizational practices with requirements arising from collective bargaining and governmental laws.

Conflict management is the process of limiting the negative aspects of conflict while increasing the positive aspects of conflict. The aim of conflict management is to enhance learning and group outcomes, including effectiveness or performance in an organizational setting. Properly managed conflict can improve group outcomes.

The resource-based view (RBV), often referred to as the "resource-based view of the firm", is a managerial framework used to determine the strategic resources a firm can exploit to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

Dominant logic relates to the main means a company uses to make a profit. In essence, it is an interpretation of how a company has succeeded. It describes the cultural norms and beliefs that the company espouses.

In organizational theory, dynamic capability is the capability of an organization to purposefully adapt an organization's resource base. The concept was defined by David Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen, in their 1997 paper Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, as the firm’s ability to engage in adapting, integrating, and reconfiguring internal and external organizational skills, resources, and functional competences to match the requirements of a changing environment.

The chief sustainability officer, sometimes known by other titles, is the corporate title of an executive position within a corporation that is in charge of the corporation's "environmental" programs. Several companies have created such environmental manager positions in the 21st century to formalize their commitment to the environment. The rise of the investor ESG movement and stakeholder capitalism, has increased the need for corporations to address sustainability and social issues across their value chain, and address growing needs of external stakeholders. Normally these responsibilities rest with the facility manager, who has provided cost effective resource and environmental control as part of the basic services necessary for the company to function. However, as sustainability initiatives have expanded beyond the facility — so has the importance of the position to what is now a C-level executive role. The position of CSO has not been standardized across industries and individual companies which leads it to take on differing roles depending on the organization. The position has also been challenged as symbolic, in that it does not actually have the effect of increasing sustainable practices.

Organizational conflict, or workplace conflict, is a state of discord caused by the actual or perceived opposition of needs, values and interests between people working together. Conflict takes many forms in organizations. There is the inevitable clash between formal authority and power and those individuals and groups affected. There are disputes over how revenues should be divided, how the work should be done, and how long and hard people should work. There are jurisdictional disagreements among individuals, departments, and between unions and management. There are subtler forms of conflict involving rivalries, jealousies, personality clashes, role definitions, and struggles for power and favor. There is also conflict within individuals – between competing needs and demands – to which individuals respond in different ways.

A chief strategy officer (CSO) is an executive that usually reports to the CEO and has primary responsibility for strategy formulation and management, including developing the corporate vision and strategy, overseeing strategic planning, and leading strategic initiatives, including M&A, transformation, partnerships, and cost reduction. Some companies give the title of Chief Strategist or Chief Business Officer to its senior executives who are holding the top strategy role.

Professional abuse is "a pattern of conduct in which a person abuses, violates, or takes advantage of a victim within the context of the abuser's profession." This typically involves a violation of the relevant professional organization's code of ethics. Organizational ethics or standards of behavior require the maintenance of professional boundaries and the treatment of people with respect and dignity.

Technology scouting is an element of technology management in which

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfred A. Marcus</span> American academic (born 1950)

Alfred Allen Marcus is an American author and the Edson Spencer Professor of Strategy and Technology Leadership at the Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota and the Technological Leadership Institute. He has worked as a consultant with companies such as 3M, Corning Inc., Xcel Energy, Medtronic, General Mills, and IBM and has also taught as a visiting professor at Technion, INCAE, BI Norwegian Business School, Fordham University, and MIT.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Team effectiveness</span> A teams ability to accomplish their goals or objectives

Team effectiveness is the capacity a team has to accomplish the goals or objectives administered by an authorized personnel or the organization. A team is a collection of individuals who are interdependent in their tasks, share responsibility for outcomes, and view themselves as a unit embedded in an institutional or organizational system which operates within the established boundaries of that system. Teams and groups have established a synonymous relationship within the confines of processes and research relating to their effectiveness while still maintaining their independence as two separate units, as groups and their members are independent of each other's role, skill, knowledge or purpose versus teams and their members, who are interdependent upon each other's role, skill, knowledge and purpose.

Strategic control is the process used by organizations to control the formation and execution of strategic plans; it is a specialised form of management control, and differs from other forms of management control in respects of its need to handle uncertainty and ambiguity at various points in the control process.

Colin Eden was a professor in management science and operations research at Strathclyde University.

References

  1. ↑ Dance, Anthony (2019). Pragmatic Introduction to Middle Management. Amazon: eBookit. pp. 8–14. ASIN   B07L4D3QB9.
  2. 1 2 Business / O. C. Ferrell, Geoffrey A. Hirt, Linda Ferrell (6e ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 2019. ISBN   978-1-259-92945-8.
  3. ↑ Zhang, Letian (2023). "The Changing Role of Managers". American Journal of Sociology. 129 (2): 439–484. doi:10.1086/727145. ISSN   0002-9602.
  4. ↑ Likert, R (1961). New Patterns of Management. New-York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. ↑ Barnard, Chester I. (1973). The Functions of the Executive. London: Oxford University Press.
  6. 1 2 Floyd, S. W.; Wooldridge, B. (1992). "Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note". Strategic Management Journal. 13 (S1): 153–167. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131012.
  7. 1 2 3 Dance, Anthony (2011). "The ambiguity of the middle management role" (PDF). www.managerperformance.co.uk. Manager Performance. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2013. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
  8. 1 2 Zhang, Ann Yan; Tsui, Anne S.; Song, Lynda Jiwen; Li, Chaoping; Jia, Liangding (2008). "How do I trust thee? The employee‐organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization". Human Resource Management. 47 (1): 111–132. doi:10.1002/hrm.20200.
  9. ↑ Rouleau, L.; Balogun, J. (2011). "Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence" (PDF). Journal of Management Studies . 48 (5): 953–983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00941.x. S2CID   145090455.
  10. ↑ Ranson, S.; Hinings, B.; Greenwood, R. (1980). "The structuring of organizational structures". Administrative Science Quarterly. 25 (1): 1–17. doi:10.2307/2392223. JSTOR   2392223.
  11. ↑ Dutton, J. E.; Duncan, R. B. (1987). "The influence of the strategic planning process on strategic change". Strategic Management Journal. 8 (2): 103–116. doi:10.1002/smj.4250080202.
  12. ↑ Floyd, Steven W.; Wooldridge, Bill (1997). "Middle management's strategic influence and organizational performance". Journal of Management Studies. 3 (34): 466–482. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00059.
  13. ↑ Connors, J. L.; Rom berg, T. A. (1991). "Middle management and quality control: Strategies for obstructionism". Human Organization. 50: 61–65. doi:10.17730/humo.50.1.2w81h2l600260704.
  14. ↑ Scarbrough, H.; Burrell, G. (1996). Clegg, S.; Palmer, G. (eds.). "The Axeman Cometh: the changing role and knowledge of middle managers". The Politics of Management Knowledge.
  15. ↑ Dopson, S.; Stewart, R. (1993). "Information technology, organizational restructuring and the future of middle management". New Technology, Work and Employment. 1 (8): 10–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.1993.tb00030.x.
  16. ↑ Williams, David. "The End Of Middle Managers (And Why They'll Never Be Missed)". forbes.com. Retrieved 26 October 2014.
  17. ↑ Balogun, J (2003). "From Blaming the Middle to Harnessing its Potential: Creating Change Intermediaries". British Journal of Management. 14 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00266.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.