Enterprise legal management

Last updated

Enterprise legal management (ELM) is a practice management strategy of corporate legal departments, insurance claims departments, and government legal and contract management departments.

Contents

ELM developed during the 1990s in response to increase corporate demands for accountability, transparency, and predictability. It employs software to manage internal legal documents and workflows, electronic billing and invoicing, and to guide decision-making through reporting and analytics.

Definitions

Still an evolving term, ELM is a recognized management discipline and a strategic objective of general counsel. [1] Some have argued that ELM falls within the broader category of corporate governance, risk, and compliance (GRC); others maintain that ELM and GRC are separate entities along a continuum. [2]

Separate but related technologies include information governance, electronic discovery, legal hold, contract management, corporate secretary, and board of directors’ communications. [3] ELM software may integrate some or all of these components.

Historical development

Early practice management

Law practice management refers to the business aspect of operating a law firm or in-house legal team. Components include economics, workplace communication and management, ethics, and client service. [4]

Historically, corporate legal spend was considered a “black box” with limited predictability and transparency, making it difficult for corporate legal teams to parse differences of efficiency and cost among outside firms, or to benchmark firm performance against previously hired counsel. [5]

Transition and early adoption

Several factors led to a shift away from traditional, low-technology solutions and toward ELM, most notably the expansion of the Internet during the 1990s and subsequent development of Software as a service (SaaS) platforms. Within legal departments, factors included greater regulatory compliance risk, smaller budgets, and board member demands for greater accountability, predictability, and transparency. [6]

Over time, the demand for budgetary information, including metrics such as the ratio of legal spend to total enterprise revenue, extended beyond board members to include other stakeholders. Corporate legal departments were positioned as the next frontier of corporate efficiency and risk management, and encouraged to operate as a true business partner. [7] This created pressure to reduce costs and, when possible, generate revenue for the larger enterprise.

Departments’ varied sizes and responsibilities created a range of practice management needs. A legal department with a small number of in-house attorneys might oversee thousands of cases managed by outside counsel, while a large internal legal department could handle most cases in-house. Smaller departments focused on management of workflow, collaboration, and spend management; larger departments had greater needs for internal matter management, attorney utilization, and document management. [8]

The first electronic transitions were to generic matter management applications, which replaced paper files as the system of record. [9]

Specialization and expansion

Initial enterprise resource planning systems did not meet the specific needs of legal departments. [10] External legal costs presented unique management challenges because of the billable-hour model and unpredictable labor requirements. [11] Software specialization integrated matter management and preexisting, internal billing software. This integration provided the opportunity to meet management demands for increased communication and information from within corporate legal departments. Ultimately, it extended further to combine legal information with finance, compliance, and risk-management departments. [12]

These developments also presented risks to enterprise-wide information management. Specialized software generated the potential for conflicts between company‐wide enterprise solutions and the ELM systems of in-house legal departments. [13] Additionally, maintaining data security was and remains a preeminent concern, especially for SaaS-based ELM platforms. [14] One in four chief legal officers (CLOs) reported a data breach during 2013–15, with the health-care industry especially vulnerable. [15]

ELM software

The expansion of ELM as a practice management strategy was fostered by the growth of ELM software. That growth, in turn, was made possible through the expansion of the Internet and adoption of SaaS platforms across a wide range of industries. Total revenue of all SaaS providers accelerated into the 2010s, with the International Data Corporation (IDC) forecasting revenue to grow from $22.6 billion to $50.8 billion during 2014–18. [16]

ELM software primarily supports matter management and electronic billing, with derived analytics and reporting guiding legal department business processes. As of 2013, the maturity level of the industry was characterized as early mainstream, with market penetration of less than 20%. [17]

A Blue Hill Research report stated that economic motivations have encouraged adoption, with an average return on investment of 766%; median spend contraction of 4.5% from automated processing and rejection of nonconforming invoices; and median recurring annual spend reduction of 4% from use of analytics to support data-driven spend management. [18]

Variables affecting the purchase of ELM software include considerations of license type, usage scope, maintenance and support, installation location, and license fee calculation. Vendors employ a range of licensing practices, with no model inherently advantaged or disadvantaged. [19]

Components of ELM software

Matter management

Matter management includes the storage and retrieval of all data related to matters handled by a legal department, including the creation, revision, approval, and consumption of legal documents. Matter management is used to facilitate document collaboration internally and with outside counsel. [20] In complex legal matters such as mass tort litigation, ELM software provides matter management capabilities such as batch uploading of invoices to expedite review and approval. [21]

Electronic billing

Electronic billing provides a centralized repository for legal bills and invoices, and a method to deliver those bills securely for review and payment. ELM software integrates with internal electronic billing software through the Legal Electronic Data Exchange Standard (LEDES) format, which has standardized the transfer of legal data. [22] Development of LEDES in the late 1990s was supplemented by the American Bar Association’s creation of Uniform Task-Based Management System (UTBMS) to establish consistent coding of services by outside counsel.

Electronic billing automates review for compliance errors, allocation to cost centers, and routing for approval. [23] Independent research suggests that it reduces costs by decreasing manual labor and paper costs. [24]

Analytics and business process management

Matter management and electronic billing data collected by ELM software is used to generate reports and provide analytics that influence business process management within legal departments.

According to a Gartner survey, CLOs increasingly focus on regulatory compliance, customer and stakeholder satisfaction, and risk management. [25] Efforts to reduce legal spend center on the reduction of outside counsel costs, achieved through the negotiation of alternative fee arrangements, increased reliance on internal counsel, and convergence of outside counsel. Use of flat fees for entire matters grew from 12 to 20% during 2013–15, with larger legal departments—those serving companies with at least $4 billion in annual revenue—more than twice as likely to use a flat fee structure compared to companies with less than $100 million in annual revenue. [26]

Legal departments use analytics to inform these budgeting and forecasting decisions, with the selection of outside law firms based on tradeoffs between cost and attorney performance. [27] Internal historical billing data and industry benchmarks identify trends and differences among providers, and average fees associated with matter types. Some ELM software vendors offer comparative metrics harvested from subscribers. [28]

Recent developments within ELM software include the utilization of machine learning and artificial intelligence in order to predict claims costs. These types of predictions are intended to reduce insurer's combined ratio by driving early settlements for claims likely to carry a greater than average cost. ELM vendors that offer these predictive claims include LSG, Jalubro and Thomson Reuters. Early data regarding return on investment of predictive data analytics suggests average legal spend reductions of 6-11% [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

Business intelligence comprises the strategies and technologies used by enterprises for the data analysis and management of business information. Common functions of business intelligence technologies include reporting, online analytical processing, analytics, dashboard development, data mining, process mining, complex event processing, business performance management, benchmarking, text mining, predictive analytics, and prescriptive analytics.

Expense management refers to the systems deployed by a business to process, pay, and audit employee-initiated expenses. These costs include, but are not limited to, expenses incurred for travel and entertainment. Expense management includes the policies and procedures that govern such spending, as well as the technologies and services utilized to process and analyze the data associated with it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Splunk</span> American technology company

Splunk Inc. is an American software company based in San Francisco, California, that produces software for searching, monitoring, and analyzing machine-generated data via a web-style interface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exasol</span> Database management software company

Exasol is an analytics database management software company. Its product is called Exasol, an in-memory, column-oriented, relational database management system

A talent management system (TMS) is an integrated software suite that addresses the "four pillars" of talent management: recruitment; performance management; learning and development; and compensation management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ZL Technologies</span>

ZL Technologies was founded in 1999 in Milpitas, California and is a privately held, developer of unstructured data archiving software. Its principal product, ZL UA, is used by enterprises to consolidate all unstructured data into a single repository for the purposes of information governance—i.e. compliance, legal discovery, records management, file analysis. ZL Tech' global headquarters is in Milpitas, California, and has international offices in Tokyo, Japan; Hyderabad, India; Vancouver, Canada; and Dublin, Ireland.

OneLogin, Inc. is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) provider that develops a unified access management (UAM) platform for enterprise-level businesses and organizations.

Plateau Systems is a provider of Talent Management Systems headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, with offices across the United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The company provides SaaS products that allow organizations to develop, analyze, and manage organizational talent.

Workday Adaptive Planning, formerly Adaptive Insights, is a software as a service company headquartered in Palo Alto, California and founded in 2003. The company's acquisition by Workday, Inc. was completed in August 2018.

Datacert, acquired by Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions is a computer software company that provides enterprise legal management software and services designed for legal departments. ELM Solutions is a component of Wolters Kluwer, a global information services company.

Zenprise provided Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions to enterprises. The company's solutions were available in both on-premise and cloud-based (SaaS) versions. Zenprise MobileManager and Zencloud allowed companies and government agencies to manage and secure mobile devices, including iOS, Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and Symbian.

Coupa Software is an American technology platform for Business Spend Management (BSM). The company is headquartered in San Mateo, California with offices throughout Europe, Latin America, and Asia Pacific. Coupa helps companies gain visibility into and control over how they spend money, optimize supply chains, and manage liquidity.

Catalyst Repository Systems is a privately held company based in Denver, Colorado, USA, which develops, hosts and supports cloud-based software for the management of electronic legal discovery. Founded in 2000, the company’s main product is Insight Discovery. Catalyst has offices and data centers throughout the United States and an office and data center in Tokyo, Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CallidusCloud</span> US enterprise software and SaaS company

The SAP Sales Cloud, formerly CallidusCloud, is an enterprise software and software as a service (SaaS) company headquartered in Dublin, California. The company markets services for sales effectiveness, sales management and sales execution software and services.

Apptio is a Bellevue, Washington-based company founded in 2007 that develops technology business management (TBM) software as a service (SaaS) applications. Apptio enterprise apps are designed to assess and communicate the cost of IT services for planning, budgeting and forecasting purposes; Apptio's services offer tools for CIOs to manage technology departments' storage, applications, energy usage, cybersecurity, and reporting obligations; manage the costs of public cloud, migration to public cloud and SaaS portfolios; and adopt and scale Agile across the enterprise.

Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rosslyn Analytics</span> American technology company

Rosslyn Data Technologies is a software company providing procurement and master data management solutions. Its procurement portfolio includes software solutions for Spend Analytics, Supplier Information Management, Supplier Performance Management and Supplier Contract Management. Master Data Management solutions include Data Extraction, Data Cleansing and Data Enrichment; available via a cloud-based data platform.

Alteryx, Inc. is an American computer software company based in Irvine, California, with a development center in Broomfield, Colorado, and offices worldwide. The company's products are used for data science and analytics. The software is designed to make advanced analytics automation accessible to any data worker.

Casewise is a developer of enterprise architecture and business process analysis software with global headquarters in the U.K. and U.S. headquarters in New York City.

Microsoft Power BI is an interactive data visualization software product developed by Microsoft with a primary focus on business intelligence. It is part of the Microsoft Power Platform. Power BI is a collection of software services, apps, and connectors that work together to turn various sources of data into static and interactive data visualizations. Data may be input by reading directly from a database, webpage, PDF, or structured files such as spreadsheets, CSV, XML, JSON, XLSX, and SharePoint.

References

  1. ↑ "Enterprise Legal Management: Electronic Billing and Matter Management Systems for Corporations". Hyperion MarketView Report: 6. 2013.
  2. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  3. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  4. ↑ Mont, Joe. "When Enterprise Legal Management and GRC Collide". Compliance Week. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  5. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  6. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 8.
  7. ↑ "Enterprise Legal Management: Electronic Billing and Matter Management Systems for Corporations". Hyperion MarketView Report: 8. 2013.
  8. ↑ Iffergan, Eyal. "New Solution Models Evolve for ELM". Hyperion GP Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  9. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  10. ↑ Kozubek, Michael. "ELM Systems Provide Global Solutions". Inside Counsel. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  11. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  12. ↑ Kozubek, Michael. "ELM Systems Provide Global Solutions". Inside Counsel. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  13. ↑ "Enterprise Legal Management: Electronic Billing and Matter Management Systems for Corporations". Hyperion MarketView Report: 10. 2013.
  14. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  15. ↑ "Chief Legal Officers 2015 Survey". Association of Corporate Counsel. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  16. ↑ Dover, Christine. "Worldwide SaaS Enterprise Applications 2014–2018 Forecast and 2013 Vendor Shares". International Data Corporation. Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  17. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 9.
  18. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  19. ↑ "Enterprise Legal Management: Electronic Billing and Matter Management Systems for Corporations". Hyperion MarketView Report: 76. 2013.
  20. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  21. ↑ "Legal E-Billing Technology Geared toward Mass Tort Litigation Drastically Reduces Client Review Time". Acuity ELM. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  22. ↑ "LEDES: The Global Standard in Legal Data Exchange". LEDES. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  23. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 1.
  24. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  25. ↑ Wheeler, John (23 October 2013). "Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Legal Management". Gartner: 9.
  26. ↑ "Chief Legal Officers 2015 Survey". Association of Corporate Counsel. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  27. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  28. ↑ Houlihan, David. "Benchmark Report: The Business Value of Legal Spend Management Investments". Blue Hill Research. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  29. ↑ Markham, Matthew. "ELM Overview: The Impact of Predictive Claims Analytics in ELM Software". LSG. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.