Public economics

Last updated

Public economics (or economics of the public sector) is the study of government policy through the lens of economic efficiency and equity. Public economics builds on the theory of welfare economics and is ultimately used as a tool to improve social welfare.

Contents

Public economics provides a framework for thinking about whether or not the government should participate in economic markets and to what extent it should do so. Microeconomic theory is utilized to assess whether the private market is likely to provide efficient outcomes in the absence of governmental interference; this study involves the analysis of government taxation and expenditures.

This subject encompasses a host of topics including market failures, externalities, and the creation and implementation of government policy. [1]

Broad methods and topics include:

Emphasis is on analytical and scientific methods and normative-ethical analysis, as distinguished from ideology. Examples of topics covered are tax incidence, [7] optimal taxation, [8] and the theory of public goods. [9]

Subject range

The Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classification codes are one way categorizing the range of economics subjects. There, Public Economics, one of 19 primary classifications, has 8 categories. They are listed below with JEL-code links to corresponding available article-preview links of The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online (2008) and with similar footnote links for each respective subcategory if available: [10]

JEL: H (all) – Public Economics
JEL: H0 – General
JEL: H1 – Structure and Scope of Government [11]
JEL: H2Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue [12]
JEL: H3 – Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents [13]
JEL: H4Publicly Provided Goods [14]
JEL: H5 – National Government Expenditures and Related Policies [15]
JEL: H6 – National Budget, Deficit, and Debt [16]
JEL: H7 – State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations [17]
JEL: H8 – Miscellaneous Issues. [18]

Taxation

Diamond–Mirrlees efficiency theorem

In 1971, Peter A. Diamond and James A. Mirrlees published a seminal paper which showed that even when lump-sum taxation is not available, production efficiency is still desirable. This finding is known as the Diamond–Mirrlees efficiency theorem, and it is widely credited with having modernized Ramsey's analysis by considering the problem of income distribution with the problem of raising revenue. Joseph E. Stiglitz and Partha Dasgupta (1971) have criticized this theorem as not being robust on the grounds that production efficiency will not necessarily be desirable if certain tax instruments cannot be used.

Pigouvian taxes

A.C. Pigou (1877-1959). A.C. Pigou.jpg
A.C. Pigou (1877-1959).

One of the achievements for which the great English economist A.C. Pigou is known, was his work on the divergences between marginal private costs and marginal social costs (externalities). In his book, The Economics of Welfare (1932), Pigou describes how these divergences come about:

...one person A, in the course of rendering some service, for which payment is made, to a second person B, incidentally also renders services or disservices to other persons (not producers of like services), of such a sort that payment cannot be extracted from the benefited parties or compensation enforced on behalf of the injured parties (Pigou p. 183).

In particular, Pigou is known for his advocacy of what are known as corrective taxes, or Pigouvian taxes:

It is plain that divergences between private and social net product of the kinds we have so far been considering cannot, like divergences due to tenancy laws, be mitigated by a modification of the contractual relation between any two contracting parties, because the divergence arises out of a service or disservice to persons other than the contracting parties. It is, however, possible for the State, if it so chooses, to remove the divergence in any field by "extraordinary encouragements" or "extraordinary restraints" upon investments in that field. The most obvious forms which these encouragements and restraints may assume are, of course, those of bounties and taxes (Pigou p. 192).

Externalities arise when consumption by individuals or production by firms affect the utility or production function of other individuals or firms. [19] Positive externalities are education, public health and others while examples of negative externalities are air pollution, noise pollution, non-vaccination and more. [20] The government can intervene in the market, using an emission tax for example to create a more efficient outcome; this Pigouvian tax is the optimal policy prescription for any aggregate, negative externality. [21]

Pigou describes as positive externalities, examples such as resources invested in private parks that improve the surrounding air, and scientific research from which discoveries of high practical utility often grow. Alternatively, he describes negative externalities, such as the factory that destroys a great part of the amenities of neighboring sites.

In 1960, the economist Ronald H. Coase proposed an alternative scheme whereby negative externalities are dealt with through the appropriate assignment of property rights. This result is known as the Coase theorem.

Public goods

Public goods, or collective consumption goods, exhibit two properties; non-rivalry and non-excludability. Something is non-rivaled if one person's consumption of it does not deprive another person, (to a point) a firework display is non-rivaled - since one person watching a firework display does not prevent another person from doing so. Something is non-excludable if its use cannot be limited to a certain group of people. Again, since one cannot prevent people from viewing a firework display it is non-excludable. [9] Conceptually, another example of public good is the service that is provided by law enforcement organizations, such as sheriffs and police. [22] Typically, cities and towns are served by only one police department, and the police department serves all of the people within its jurisdiction.

Cost–benefit analysis

Jules Dupuit (1804-1866). Julesdupuit.jpg
Jules Dupuit (1804-1866).

While the origins of cost–benefit analysis can be traced back to Jules Dupuit's classic article "On the Measurement of the Utility of Public Works" (1844), much of the subsequent scholarly development occurred in the United States and arose from the challenges of water-resource development. In 1950, the U.S. Federal Interagency River Basin Committee's Subcommittee on Benefits and Costs published a report entitled, Proposed Practices for Economic Analysis of River Basin Projects (also known as the Green Book), which became noteworthy for bringing in the language of welfare economics. [23] In 1958, Otto Eckstein published Water-Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation, and Roland McKean published his Efficiency in Government Through Systems Analysis: With Emphasis on Water Resources Development. The latter book is also considered a classic in the field of operations research. In subsequent years, several other important works appeared: Jack Hirshleifer, James DeHaven, and Jerome W. Milliman published a volume entitled Water Supply: Economics, Technology, and Policy (1960); and a group of Harvard scholars including Robert Dorfman, Stephen Marglin, and others published Design of Water-Resource Systems: New Techniques for Relating Economic Objectives, Engineering Analysis, and Governmental Planning (1962). [24]

See also

Notes

  1. Serge-Christophe Kolm, 1987. "public economics," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics , v. 3, pp. 1047–55. Table of Contents.
  2. Richard A. Musgrave, 2008. "public finance," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
       • _____, 1959.
    The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. J.M. Buchanan review, 1st page.
  3. • Dani Rodrik, 1996. "Understanding Economic Policy Reform," Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), pp. 9–41. Archived June 6, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
    From The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, 2008. Abstract links for:
      behavioural public economics" by B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel
      "fiscal federalism" by David E. Wildasin
      "hazardous waste, economics of" by Hilary Sigman.
      "nutrition and public policy in advanced economies" by Janet Currie.
  4. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2008, 2nd Edition. Abstract/contents links for:
      "public finance" by Richard A. Musgrave
      "consumption taxation" by James M. Poterba
      "distributive politics and targeted public spending" by Brian G. Knight
      "generational accounting" by Jagadeesh Gokhale
      "nutrition and public policy in advanced economies" by Janet Currie
      "progressive and regressive taxation" by William Vickrey and Efe A. Ok
      "redistribution of income and wealth" by F.A. Cowell
      "tax expenditures" by Daniel N. Shaviro
      "taxation and poverty" by John Karl Scholz
      "welfare state" by Assar Lindbeck.
      social insurance and public policy by Jonathan Gruber.
  5. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2008, 2nd Edition. Abstract links for:
      "market failure" by John O. Ledyard
      "bureaucracy" by Mancur Olson
      "health insurance, economics of" by Joseph P. Newhouse
      "mandated employer provision of employee benefits" by Jonathan Gruber
      "public goods" by Agnar Sandmo
  6. • Sharun W. Mukand, 2008. "policy reform, political economy of," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2nd Edition. Abstract.
      James M. Buchanan, 2008. "public debt," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2nd Edition. Abstract.
       • Mrinal Datta-Chaudhuri, 1990. "Market Failure and Government Failure," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3) , pp. 25-39..
      Kenneth J. Arrow, 1969. "The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocations," in Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPP System. Washington, D.C., Joint Economic Committee of Congress. PDF reprint as pp. 1-16 (press +).
      Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2009. "Regulation and Failure," in David Moss and John Cisternino (eds.), New Perspectives on Regulation, ch. 1, pp. 11-23. Archived February 14, 2010, at the Wayback Machine Cambridge: The Tobin Project.
  7. Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2008. "tax incidence," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
  8. Louis Kaplow, 2008. "optimal taxation," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
  9. 1 2 Agnar Sandmo, 2008."public goods," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
       • Serge-Christophe Kolm, 1987. "public economics," The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics , v. 3, pp. 1047-48.
      Anthony B. Atkinson and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1980. Lectures in Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, pp. vii-xi.
      Mancur Olson, 1971, 2nd ed.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Description and chapter-previews links, pp. ix-x.
  10. Of which a complete list with Wikipedia links is at JEL classification codes#Public economics JEL: H Subcategories
  11. JEL: H11 – Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
    JEL: H12 - Crisis management
  12. JEL: H21 – Efficiency; Optimal taxation
    JEL: H22 – Incidence
    JEL: H23 – Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental taxes and Subsidies
    JEL: H24 – Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    JEL: H25 – Business Taxes and Subsidies
    JEL: H26 – Tax evasion
  13. JEL: H31 – Household
    JEL: H32 – Firm
  14. JEL: H40 – General
    JEL: H41Public goods
    JEL: H42 – Publicly Provided Private Goods
    JEL: H43Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    JEL: H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
  15. JEL: H51 – Government Expenditures and Health
    JEL: H52 – Government Expenditures and Education
    JEL: H53 – Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    JEL: H54 – Infrastructures; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock
    JEL: H55Social security and Public Pensions
    JEL: H56 – National Security and War
    JEL: H57 – Procurement
  16. JEL: H60 – General
    JEL: H61 – Budget; Budget Systems
    JEL: H62 – Deficit; Surplus
    JEL: H63 - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
    JEL: H68 – Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt
    JEL: H69 – Other
  17. JEL: H71 – State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    JEL: H72 – State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    JEL: H73 – Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    JEL: H74 – State and Local Borrowing
    JEL: H75 - State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
    JEL: H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories
    JEL: H77 - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism; Secession
  18. JEL: H80 – General
    JEL: H81 – Governmental Loans, Loan guarantee, Credits, and Grants; Bailouts
    JEL: H82 – Governmental Property
    JEL: H83 – Public administration; Public Sector Accounting and Audits
    JEL: H84 - Disaster Aid
    JEL: H87 – International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods
  19. Tresch, Richard. W. (2008). Public Sector Economics. 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. p. 100. ISBN   978-0-230-52223-7.CS1 maint: location (link)
  20. Tresch, Richard W. (2008). Public Sector Economics. 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. ISBN   978-0-230-52223-7.CS1 maint: location (link)
  21. Tresch, Richard W. (2008). Public Sector Economics. 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. p. 108. ISBN   978-0-230-52223-7.CS1 maint: location (link)
  22. Doss, Daniel; Sumrall, William; McElreath, David; Jones, Don (2014). Economic and Financial Analysis for Criminal Justice Organizations (1st ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 138. ISBN   978-1466592063.
  23. A.R. Prest and R. Turvey, 1965. "Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Survey" The Economic Journal, 75(300) pp. 683-735.
  24. Introduction to Benefit-Cost Analysis

Related Research Articles

Political economy Study of production, buying, and selling, and their relations with law, custom, and government

Political economy is the study of production and trade and their relations with law, custom and government; and with the distribution of national income and wealth. As a discipline, political economy originated in moral philosophy, in the 18th century, to explore the administration of states' wealth, with "political" signifying the Greek word polity and "economy" signifying the Greek word "okonomie". The earliest works of political economy are usually attributed to the British scholars Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo, although they were preceded by the work of the French physiocrats, such as François Quesnay (1694–1774) and Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot (1727–1781).

In economics, industrial organization or industrial economy is a field that builds on the theory of the firm by examining the structure of firms and markets. Industrial organization adds real-world complications to the perfectly competitive model, complications such as transaction costs, limited information, and barriers to entry of new firms that may be associated with imperfect competition. It analyzes determinants of firm and market organization and behavior as between competition and monopoly, including from government actions.

Public choice, or public choice theory, is "the use of economic tools to deal with traditional problems of political science". Its content includes the study of political behavior. In political science, it is the subset of positive political theory that studies self-interested agents and their interactions, which can be represented in a number of ways – using standard constrained utility maximization, game theory, or decision theory.

Arthur Cecil Pigou British economist

Arthur Cecil Pigou was an English economist. As a teacher and builder of the School of Economics at the University of Cambridge, he trained and influenced many Cambridge economists who went on to take chairs of economics around the world. His work covered various fields of economics, particularly welfare economics, but also included Business cycle theory, unemployment, public finance, index numbers, and measurement of national output. His reputation was affected adversely by influential economic writers who used his work as the basis on which to define their own opposing views. He reluctantly served on several public committees, including the Cunliffe Committee and the 1919 Royal Commission on Income tax.

Public finance public finance in economics

Public finance is the study of the role of the government in the economy. It is the branch of economics that assesses the government revenue and government expenditure of the public authorities and the adjustment of one or the other to achieve desirable effects and avoid undesirable ones.

Monetary economics is the branch of economics that studies the different competing theories of money: it provides a framework for analyzing money and considers its functions, and it considers how money, for example fiat currency, can gain acceptance purely because of its convenience as a public good. The discipline has historically prefigured, and remains integrally linked to, macroeconomics. This branch also examines the effects of monetary systems, including regulation of money and associated financial institutions and international aspects.

A Pigovian tax is a tax on any market activity that generates negative externalities. The tax is intended to correct an undesirable or inefficient market outcome, and does so by being set equal to the social cost of the negative externalities. In the presence of negative externalities, the social cost of a market activity is not covered by the private cost of the activity. In such a case, the market outcome is not efficient and may lead to over-consumption of the product. Often-cited examples of such externalities are environmental pollution, and increased public healthcare costs associated with tobacco and sugary drink consumption.

National accounts or national account systems (NAS) are the implementation of complete and consistent accounting techniques for measuring the economic activity of a nation. These include detailed underlying measures that rely on double-entry accounting. By design, such accounting makes the totals on both sides of an account equal even though they each measure different characteristics, for example production and the income from it. As a method, the subject is termed national accounting or, more generally, social accounting. Stated otherwise, national accounts as systems may be distinguished from the economic data associated with those systems. While sharing many common principles with business accounting, national accounts are based on economic concepts. One conceptual construct for representing flows of all economic transactions that take place in an economy is a social accounting matrix with accounts in each respective row-column entry.

Equity (economics) fairness in economics

Equity or Economic equality is the concept or idea of fairness in economics, particularly in regard to taxation or welfare economics. More specifically, it may refer to equal life chances regardless of identity, to provide all citizens with a basic and equal minimum of income, goods, and services or to increase funds and commitment for redistribution.

Government failure, in the context of public economics, is an economic inefficiency caused by a government intervention, if the inefficiency would not exist in a true free market. It can be viewed in contrast to a market failure, which is an economic inefficiency that results from the free market itself, and can potentially be corrected through government regulation. The idea of government failure is associated with the policy argument that, even if particular markets may not meet the standard conditions of perfect competition required to ensure social optimality, government intervention may make matters worse rather than better.

Social choice theory or social choice is a theoretical framework for analysis of combining individual opinions, preferences, interests, or welfares to reach a collective decision or social welfare in some sense. A non-theoretical example of a collective decision is enacting a law or set of laws under a constitution. Social choice theory dates from Condorcet's formulation of the voting paradox. Kenneth Arrow's Social Choice and Individual Values (1951) and Arrow's impossibility theorem in it are generally acknowledged as the basis of the modern social choice theory. In addition to Arrow's theorem and the voting paradox, the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem, the Condorcet jury theorem, the median voter theorem, and May's theorem are among the more well known results from social choice theory.

Articles in economics journals are usually classified according to the JEL classification codes, a system originated by the Journal of Economic Literature. The JEL is published quarterly by the American Economic Association (AEA) and contains survey articles and information on recently published books and dissertations. The AEA maintains EconLit, a searchable data base of citations for articles, books, reviews, dissertations, and working papers classified by JEL codes for the years from 1969. A recent addition to EconLit is indexing of economics-journal articles from 1886 to 1968 parallel to the print series Index of Economic Articles.

Richard Abel Musgrave was an American economist of German heritage. His most cited work is The Theory of Public Finance (1959), described as "the first English-language treatise in the field." and "a major contribution to public finance thought."

In neoclassical economics, a market distortion is any event in which a market reaches a market clearing price for an item that is substantially different from the price that a market would achieve while operating under conditions of perfect competition and state enforcement of legal contracts and the ownership of private property. A distortion is "any departure from the ideal of perfect competition that therefore interferes with economic agents maximizing social welfare when they maximize their own". A proportional wage-income tax, for instance, is distortionary, whereas a lump-sum tax is not. In a competitive equilibrium, a proportional wage income tax discourages work.

Justice in economics is a subcategory of welfare economics with models frequently representing the ethical-social requirements of a given theory, whether "in the large", as of a just social order, or "in the small", as in the equity of "how institutions distribute specific benefits and burdens". That theory may or may not elicit acceptance. In the Journal of Economic Literature classification codes 'justice' is scrolled to at JEL: D63, wedged on the same line between 'Equity' and 'Inequality' along with 'Other Normative Criteria and Measurement'. Categories above and below the line are Externalities and Altruism.

Mathematical economics is the application of mathematical methods to represent theories and analyze problems in economics. By convention, these applied methods are beyond simple geometry, such as differential and integral calculus, difference and differential equations, matrix algebra, mathematical programming, and other computational methods. Proponents of this approach claim that it allows the formulation of theoretical relationships with rigor, generality, and simplicity.

The marginal cost of public funds (MCF) is a concept in public finance which measures the loss incurred by society in raising additional revenues to finance government spending due to the distortion of resource allocation caused by taxation. Formally, it is defined as the ratio of the marginal value of a monetary unit raised by the government and the value of that marginal private monetary unit. The applications of the marginal cost of public funds include the Samuelson condition for the optimal provision of public goods and the optimal corrective taxation of externalities in public economic theory, the determination of tax-smoothing policy rules in normative public debt analysis and social cost-benefit analysis common in practical policy analysis.

Rural economics is the study of rural economies, including:

The benefit principle is a concept in the theory of taxation from public finance. It bases taxes to pay for public-goods expenditures on a politically-revealed willingness to pay for benefits received. The principle is sometimes likened to the function of prices in allocating private goods. In its use for assessing the efficiency of taxes and appraising fiscal policy, the benefit approach was initially developed by Knut Wicksell (1896) and Erik Lindahl (1919), two economists of the Stockholm School. Wicksell's near-unanimity formulation of the principle was premised on a just income distribution. The approach was extended in the work of Paul Samuelson, Richard Musgrave, and others. It has also been applied to such subjects as tax progressivity, corporation taxes, and taxes on property or wealth. The unanimity-rule aspect of Wicksell's approach in linking taxes and expenditures is cited as a point of departure for the study of constitutional economics in the work of James Buchanan.

The concept is a merit good introduced in 1998 economics by Richard Musgrave is a commodity which is judged that an individual or society should have on the basis of some concept of need, rather than ability and willingness to pay. The term is, perhaps, less often used today than it was in the 1960s to 1980s but the concept still lies behind many economic actions by governments which are not performed specifically for financial reasons or by supporting incomes. Examples include in-kind transfers such as the provision of food stamps to support nutrition, the delivery of health services to improve quality of life and reduce morbidity, subsidized housing and education.

References

1985, v. 1. Description and preview.
1987, v. 2. Description.
2002. v. 3. Description.
2007. v. 4. Description.

Further reading