Non-executive director

Last updated

A non-executive director (abbreviated to non-exec, NED or NXD), independent director or external director is a member of the board of directors of a corporation, such as a company, cooperative or non-government organization, but not a member of the executive management team. They are not employees of the corporation or affiliated with it in any other way and are differentiated from executive directors, who are members of the board who also serve, or previously served, as executive managers of the corporation (most often as corporate officers). However they do have the same legal duties, responsibilities and potential liabilities as their executive counterparts. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Non-executive directors provide independent oversight and serve on committees concerned with sensitive issues such as the pay of the executive directors and other senior managers; they are usually paid a fee for their services but are not regarded as employees. [4]

All directors should be capable of seeing corporate and business issues in a broad perspective. Nonetheless, non-executive directors are usually chosen because of their independence and initiative, are of an appropriate caliber and have particular personal qualities. [1]

Role

Fundamentally, the non-executive director role is to provide a creative contribution and improvement to the board by providing dispassionate and objective criticism. [1] Their role may change depending on the organisation, [5] [6] though they are usually not involved in the day-to-day management of the corporation but monitor the executive activity and contribute to the development strategy. [7]

Non-executive directors can also be referred to as external directors; they are usually people of stature and experience who can act as both a source of wise independent advice and a check on any wilder elements on a board. [8]

According to the UK Institute of Directors, non-executive directors are expected to focus on board matters and not stray into ‘executive direction,’ thus providing an independent view of the corporation that is removed from day-to-day running. [1] Non-executive directors, then, are appointed to bring to the board:

In addition to the above five key qualities an effective non-executive director would influence the achievement of balance of the board of directors as a whole as well as commitment, perception and a broad perspective of the area or industry. More key responsibilities may include:

Key responsibilities

Non-executive directors have responsibilities in the following areas, according to the Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors (the Higgs report), published by the British government in 2003: [1] [10] [11]

NEDs should also provide independent views on:

Boards (and the non-executive directors on them) also have a responsibility to evaluate their own performance. Reasons for undertaking a board evaluation might include:

Much has been written about how best to go about evaluating board performance and it remains a key topic of discussion. [12] [13] [14] [15]

Negative and positive contributions

The Institute of Directors in New Zealand [16] outlines ten clear benefits that independent directors can bring to a start-up and high growth business. These are

Having a non-executive director in a business may seem necessary due to the benefits having one can provide, however it is possible a NED may contribute to a dynamic of deteriorating board relationships. Executives could come to resent or be frustrated by non-executive contributions that they perceive to be either ill-informed or inappropriate. This in turn can contribute to a dynamic of deteriorating board relationships, characterized by withholding of information and mistrust. [17] As one executive described it:

"When a non-executive director displays insight and real knowledge and undertakes a role in a very serious fashion, asks brave questions, takes an interest in issues the directors know that they are going to be kept on their toes in relation to these issues, and the respect level rises. Then that person becomes an approachable person … it is actually cumulative in terms of the benefits that can come from that … it can go completely the other way because it is just, 'well, they don't know anything about the business, they had to ask the obligatory three questions' and then the respect gets lost between the parties and you do not have a relationship that is built. It gets back down to what is the ability of the person and what is driving them to become engaged … When that engagement actually adds value and can be seen to add value, then very quickly you get a dynamic where you improve the situation." [17]

Audit

It is the duty of the whole board to ensure that a company's accounts are prepared properly. These should inform its shareholders by presenting a true and fair reflection of its actions and financial performance and all of the board should ensure that the necessary internal control systems are put into place and monitored regularly and rigorously. A non-executive director has an important part to play in fulfilling this responsibility whether or not a formal audit committee (composed of non-executive directors) of the board has been constituted. [18]

Remuneration

According to NEDonBoard, non-executive directors typically sit on the main board and have responsibility on the board sub-committees (e.g. audit committee, risk committee, nomination committee, remuneration committee). [19] Research points to an average remuneration of £60 to 80k for FTSE 100 NEDs and £50 to 60k for FTSE 250 NEDs. SMEs remunerate their non-executive directors at lower rates, in the £20-30k range. Most roles in the not-for-profit sector are voluntary roles. There are a few factors that determine the level of remuneration of a NED: [20]

Training and education

It is vitally important that all non-executive directors are aware of their duties and liabilities as well as developing the softer skills associated with the role such as board behaviour and effective challenge. There are a number of organisations who provide this type of training such as NEDonBoard, the Institute of Directors and Financial Times.

Types of organisation

A non-executive director can be appointed in different organisations:

Duties depend on whether they represent the interest of shareholders, in the private sector, or the interest of the society in public organisation. [21]

Appraisal objectives

Some organisations appraise non-executive directors on general overall performance criteria such as in the Higgs Report, [22] [23] [24] whereas others in addition set specific individual objectives, [25] which may be specifically linked to the overall organisation goals. [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Board of directors</span> Type of governing body for an organisation

A board of directors is an executive committee that jointly supervises the activities of an organization, which can be either a for-profit or a nonprofit organization such as a business, nonprofit organization, or a government agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Audit</span> Systematic and independent examination of books, accounts, documents and vouchers of an organization

An audit is an "independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not, irrespective of its size or legal form when such an examination is conducted with a view to express an opinion thereon." Auditing also attempts to ensure that the books of accounts are properly maintained by the concern as required by law. Auditors consider the propositions before them, obtain evidence, roll forward prior year working papers, and evaluate the propositions in their auditing report.

Corporate governance are mechanisms, processes and relations by which corporations are controlled and operated ("governed").

Information technology (IT)governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance, focused on information technology (IT) and its performance and risk management. The interest in IT governance is due to the ongoing need within organizations to focus value creation efforts on an organization's strategic objectives and to better manage the performance of those responsible for creating this value in the best interest of all stakeholders. It has evolved from The Principles of Scientific Management, Total Quality Management and ISO 9001 Quality management system.

An audit committee is a committee of an organisation's board of directors which is responsible for oversight of the financial reporting process, selection of the independent auditor, and receipt of audit results both internal and external.

The chief risk officer (CRO), chief risk management officer (CRMO), or chief risk and compliance officer (CRCO) of a firm or corporation is the executive accountable for enabling the efficient and effective governance of significant risks, and related opportunities, to a business and its various segments. Risks are commonly categorized as strategic, reputational, operational, financial, or compliance-related. CROs are accountable to the Executive Committee and The Board for enabling the business to balance risk and reward. In more complex organizations, they are generally responsible for coordinating the organization's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) approach. The CRO is responsible for assessing and mitigating significant competitive, regulatory, and technological threats to a firm's capital and earnings. The CRO roles and responsibilities vary depending on the size of the organization and industry. The CRO works to ensure that the firm is compliant with government regulations, such as Sarbanes–Oxley, and reviews factors that could negatively affect investments. Typically, the CRO is responsible for the firm's risk management operations, including managing, identifying, evaluating, reporting and overseeing the firm's risks externally and internally to the organization and works diligently with senior management such as chief executive officer and chief financial officer.

The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) is an organization that develops guidelines for businesses to evaluate internal controls, risk management, and fraud deterrence. In 1992, COSO published the Internal Control – Integrated Framework, commonly used by businesses in the United States to design, implement, and conduct systems of internal control over financial reporting and assessing their effectiveness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial Reporting Council</span> Regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is an independent regulator in the UK and Ireland based in London Wall in the City of London, responsible for regulating auditors, accountants and actuaries, and setting the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. The FRC seeks to promote transparency and integrity in business by aiming its work at investors and others who rely on company reports, audits and high-quality risk management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internal audit</span> Independent, objective assurance and consulting activity

Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes. Internal auditing might achieve this goal by providing insight and recommendations based on analyses and assessments of data and business processes. With commitment to integrity and accountability, internal auditing provides value to governing bodies and senior management as an objective source of independent advice. Professionals called internal auditors are employed by organizations to perform the internal auditing activity.


A Company Secretary is a senior position in the corporate governance of organizations, playing a crucial role in ensuring adherence to statutory and regulatory requirements. This position is integral to the efficient functioning of corporations, particularly in common law jurisdictions. The Company Secretary serves as a guardian of compliance, a facilitator of communication between the board of directors and other stakeholders, and a custodian of corporate records.

Internal control, as defined by accounting and auditing, is a process for assuring of an organization's objectives in operational effectiveness and efficiency, reliable financial reporting, and compliance with laws, regulations and policies. A broad concept, internal control involves everything that controls risks to an organization.

Robin Buchanan is a Director of companies and an adviser to family offices, private equity firms, businesses and voluntary organisations.

The King Report on Corporate Governance is a booklet of guidelines for the governance structures and operation of companies in South Africa. It is issued by the King Committee on Corporate Governance. Three reports were issued in 1994, 2002, and 2009 and a fourth revision in 2016. The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA) owns the copyright of the King Report on Corporate Governance and the King Code of Corporate Governance. Compliance with the King Reports is a requirement for companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The King Report on Corporate Governance has been cited as "the most effective summary of the best international practices in corporate governance".

The UK Corporate Governance code, formerly known as the Combined Code is a part of UK company law with a set of principles of good corporate governance aimed at companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is overseen by the Financial Reporting Council and its importance derives from the Financial Conduct Authority's Listing Rules. The Listing Rules themselves are given statutory authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and require that public listed companies disclose how they have complied with the code, and explain where they have not applied the code – in what the code refers to as 'comply or explain'. Private companies are also encouraged to conform; however there is no requirement for disclosure of compliance in private company accounts. The Code adopts a principles-based approach in the sense that it provides general guidelines of best practice. This contrasts with a rules-based approach which rigidly defines exact provisions that must be adhered to. In 2017, it was announced that the Financial Reporting Council would amend the Code to require companies to "comply or explain" with a requirement to have elected employee representatives on company boards.

Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors was a report chaired by Derek Higgs on corporate governance commissioned by the UK government, published on 20 January 2003. It reviewed the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors and of the audit committee, aiming at improving and strengthening the existing Combined Code.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Entity-level controls</span>

Entity-level controls are controls that help to ensure that management directives pertaining to the entire entity are carried out. They are the second level of a to understanding the risks of an organization. Generally, entity refers to the entire company.

In Italy the Senior Civil Service or "la dirigenza" is the set of high-ranking executives (“Dirigenti”) who are in charge of the top and middle management of national or local governmental offices.

The chief audit executive (CAE), director of audit, director of internal audit, auditor general, or controller general is a high-level independent corporate executive with overall responsibility for internal audit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Director (business)</span> Title given to the senior management staff of a large organization

The term director is a title given to the senior management staff of businesses and other large organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Control self-assessment</span> Technique to assess process effectiveness

Control self-assessment is a technique developed in 1987 that is used by a range of organisations including corporations, charities and government departments, to assess the effectiveness of their risk management and control processes.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "The role of the non-executive director" (PDF). Institute of Directors. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 April 2015. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  2. ↑ Hayes, Keith (2014). Business Journalism: How to Report on Business and Economics. Apress. ISBN   978-1-4302-6349-4.
  3. ↑ "Executive Coaching". CoachDirectors. Retrieved 2017-03-02.
  4. ↑ Bott, Frank (2014). Professional Issues in Information Technology - Second edition. BCS Learning & Development Limited. ISBN   978-1-78017-180-7.
  5. ↑ "Role of the Non-Executive Director". BUPA. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  6. ↑ Arnold, Glen (2013). Get Started in Shares. FT Publishing International. ISBN   978-0-273-77122-7.
  7. 1 2 3 Wilson, Paul (29 March 2010). "The Increasing Importance Of Non-Executive Directors". mondaq. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  8. ↑ Colin, Barrow (2013). The 30 Day MBA, 3rd Edition. Kogan Page. ISBN   978-0-7494-6990-0.
  9. ↑ "The Increasing Importance Of Non-Executive Directors". Comsure Group. 28 February 2010. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  10. ↑ Higgs, Derek (2003-01-20). "Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2007. Retrieved 20 October 2007.
  11. ↑ "The Higgs Review summary page". Archived from the original on 30 October 2007. Retrieved 20 October 2007.
  12. ↑ "How Boards Should Evaluate Their Own Performance". Harvard Business Review. 2017-03-01. Retrieved 2018-06-29.
  13. ↑ "Appraising Boardroom Performance". Harvard Business Review. 1998-01-01. Retrieved 2018-06-29.
  14. ↑ "How do you evaluate board performance?". 2018-04-18. Retrieved 2018-06-29.
  15. ↑ "Board evaluations and effectiveness reviews" . Retrieved 2018-06-29.
  16. ↑ "Types of directors - Institute of Directors in New Zealand". www.iod.org.nz. Retrieved 2019-06-27.
  17. 1 2 Roberts, John (8 March 2005). "Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom". British Journal of Management. 16: S5–S26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x.
  18. ↑ (Firm), Pinsent Masons (2010). The Director's Handbook. ISBN   9780749460587.
  19. ↑ "The key differences between executive and non executive directors - NEDonBoard". NEDonBoard. Retrieved 2018-06-01.
  20. ↑ "What can you expect as compensation for a non-executive director role - NEDonBoard". NEDonBoard.
  21. ↑ "What to Expect of the NED Role, NEDonBoard". 6 June 2017. Retrieved 3 June 2017.
  22. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2014-06-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  23. ↑ "Council of Governor Meeting: 16 January 2014" (PDF). Colchesterhospital.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2017-03-30.
  24. ↑ "Resources and factsheets". Iod.com. Retrieved 2017-03-30.
  25. ↑ Winter, A J G (12 April 2013). "PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT & APPRAISAL OF NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 2012/13 AND OBJECTIVES FOR 2013/14" (PDF). neas. Retrieved 3 November 2015.
  26. ↑ "Council of Governor Meeting: 2 March 2009" (PDF). Sabp.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2017-03-30.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.