Onion (Arendt)

Last updated

The onion metaphor is a metaphor used by the philosopher Hannah Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). It is used to provide an example of the underlying structure that characterizes the organization of totalitarianism.

Contents

Background

Hannah Arendt was a philosopher accustomed to using metaphors. Among other things, she advocated for their use in philosophical reflection in her Journal of Thoughts. [1] In The Origins of Totalitarianism, Arendt explored the question of totalitarianism – how these types of regimes form, evolve, exist, and perish. [2] She also examined the differences between totalitarianism and other forms of political systems, such as autocratic regimes. [2] [3] [4]

Metaphor

In this context, Arendt uses the metaphor of the onion to represent the structure of totalitarian systems. [2] [5] [6] This metaphor illustrates an organized structure centered around a central point, the leader of the totalitarian system. [2] She contrasts this structure with other types, such as the pyramid-like structures of autocracy or tyranny. [7] [8] This depiction reveals that totalitarianism evolves in "waves", spreading through different layers of society. [9] The closer one is to the center, the more radicalized they become, whereas those closer to the periphery are less radicalized. [7] With this example, Arendt also exposes the dual nature of totalitarian organizations, possessing two faces—one presented to the external world, appearing normal, and another turned inward, radicalized. [7]

The metaphor is described by researchers like Sophie Schulze as follows: [10]

For Arendt, the onion structure designates two distinct things: one, that power diffuses from the center to the periphery (centrifugal movement); the other, that each circle maintains itself through the balance between two opposing forces.

This structure also enables totalitarian regimes to absorb shocks from the external reality of the system. [11] Each layer of the onion absorbs a bit of the shockwave, ultimately rendering the contact with external reality harmless. This occurs despite the contradictions with the practical and scientific lies propagated by totalitarian regimes. [11] [12]

Legacy

The use of the metaphor was deemed relevant when discussing, among other things, the USSR under Stalin, Nazi Germany, and Imperial Japan. [13] The notion that this structure helps totalitarian regimes avoid 'external reality shocks' is also considered an important concept in psychology. [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Totalitarianism</span> Extreme form of authoritarianism

Totalitarianism is a form of government and a political system that prohibits all opposition parties, outlaws individual and group opposition to the state and its claims, and exercises an extremely high if not complete degree of control and regulation over public and private life. It is regarded as the most extreme and complete form of authoritarianism. In totalitarian states, political power is often held by autocrats, such as dictators, who employ all-encompassing campaigns in which propaganda is broadcast by state-controlled mass media in order to control the citizenry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hannah Arendt</span> German-American political theorist and philosopher (1906–1975)

Hannah Arendt was a German-American historian and philosopher. She was one of the most influential political theorists of the 20th century.

In political science, a political system means the type of political organization that can be recognized, observed or otherwise declared by a state.

<i>The Origins of Totalitarianism</i> Book by Hannah Arendt examining Nazism and Stalinism

The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951, was Hannah Arendt's first major work, where she describes and analyzes Nazism and Stalinism as the major totalitarian political movements of the first half of the 20th century.

Claude Lefort was a French philosopher and activist.

The aestheticization of politics was an idea first coined by Walter Benjamin as being a key ingredient to fascist regimes. Benjamin said that fascism tends towards an aestheticization of politics, in the sense of a spectacle in which it allows the masses to express themselves without seeing their rights recognized, and without affecting the relations of ownership which the proletarian masses aim to eliminate. Benjamin said:

Fascism attempts to organize the newly proletarianized masses without affecting the property structure which the masses strive to eliminate. Fascism sees its salvation in giving these masses not their right, but instead a chance to express themselves. The masses have a right to change property relations; Fascism seeks to give them an expression while preserving property. The logical result of Fascism is the introduction of aesthetics into political life. (...) Mankind, which in Homer’s time was a spectacle for the Olympian gods, has become one for itself. (...) Communism responds by politicizing art.

Robert Jaulin was a French ethnologist. After several journeys to Chad, between 1954 and 1959, among the Sara people, he published in 1967 La Mort Sara in which he exposed the various initiation rites through which he had passed himself, and closely analyzed Sara geomancy. In La Paix blanche, he redefined the notion of ethnocide in relation to the extermination by the Western world of the Bari culture, located between Venezuela and Colombia. As genocide designs the physical extermination of a people, an ethnocide refers to the extermination of a culture.

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of democracy, civil liberties, and political plurality. It involves the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

Inverted totalitarianism is a system where economic powers like corporations exert subtle but substantial power over a system that superficially seems democratic. Over time, this theory predicts a sense of powerlessness and political apathy, continuing a slide away from political egalitarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prague Declaration</span> Political declaration signed in 2008 in the Czech Republic

The Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism was a declaration which was initiated by the Czech government and signed on 3 June 2008 by prominent European politicians, former political prisoners and historians, among them former Czech President Václav Havel and future German President Joachim Gauck, calling for "Europe-wide condemnation of, and education about, the crimes of communism." Much of the content of the declaration reproduced demands formulated by the European People's Party in 2004, and draws heavily on the theory or conception of totalitarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miguel Abensour</span> French philosopher (1939–2017)

Miguel Abensour was a French philosopher specializing in political philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism</span> Analysis of similarities and differences between ideologies

Some historians and other authors have carried out comparisons of Nazism and Stalinism. They have considered the similarities and differences between the two ideologies and political systems, the relationship between the two regimes, and why both came to prominence simultaneously. During the 20th century, the comparison of Nazism and Stalinism was made on totalitarianism, ideology, and personality cult. Both regimes were seen in contrast to the liberal democratic Western world, emphasising the similarities between the two.

The Platform of European Memory and Conscience is an educational project of the European Union bringing together government institutions and NGOs from EU countries active in research, documentation, awareness raising and education about the crimes of totalitarian regimes. Its membership includes 68 government agencies and NGOs from 15 EU member states and 8 non-EU countries including Ukraine, Albania, Georgia, Iceland, Moldova, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada. Its members include the Institute of National Remembrance, the Berlin-Hohenschönhausen Memorial, the Stasi Records Agency and the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. The platform has offices in Prague and Brussels (formerly). The President of the platform was Göran Lindblad (politician) (2012-2017), later Łukasz Kamiński, former President of the Polish Institute of National Remembrance (2017-2022). In the current term of office Marek Mutor serves the President of Platform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hannah Arendt Institute for Totalitarianism Studies</span> German research institute

The Hannah Arendt Institute for Totalitarianism Studies is a research institute hosted by Dresden University of Technology and devoted to the comparative analysis of dictatorships. The institute focusses particularly on the structures of Nazism and Communism as well as on the presuppositions and consequences of the two ideological dictatorships. The institute is named after the German-American philosopher and political scientist Hannah Arendt, whose magnum opus The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) is considered across disciplines as one of the most influential works of the 20th century and continues to shape in particular scholarly discussions of totalitarian systems of political domination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Totalitarian architecture</span> Relationship between architecture and totalitarian states

Totalitarian architecture is a term utilized to refer to the relationship between totalitarianism and architecture, often in the context of alleged "approved styles" of architecture within totalitarian regimes. Most commonly, the term is used to describe an observed fixation on Neo-Classicism and realism within specific regimes. Such fixations on neo-Classicism are not unique to totalitarian regimes, however, and manifest in other political and social systems historically and globally. Beyond Neo-Classicism, descriptions of the architecture of totalitarian regimes sometimes focus on brutalist architecture, often in the context of Le Corbusier and his associations with Benito Mussolini. In contrast to these views, several authors have upheld brutalism and socialist realism as modernist art forms which exist beyond simply being physical manifestations of totalitarian ideology.

The Seventy Years Declaration was a declaration initiated by the American academic Dovid Katz and the Australian academic Danny Ben-Moshe, and released on 20 January 2012 to protest the policies of several European states and European Union bodies concerning the evaluation, remembrance and prosecution of crimes committed by communist dictatorships in Europe, specifically policies of many European countries and the EU treating the Nazi and Stalinist regimes in Eastern and Central Europe as equally criminal. Presented as a response to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism initiated by the Czech government in 2008 to condemn communism as totalitarian and criminal, it explicitly rejects the idea that the regimes of Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler are morally equivalent, i.e. the totalitarianism theory that was popularized by academics such as Hannah Arendt, Carl Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski and became dominant in Western political discourse during the Cold War, and that gained new popularity in many new EU member states after the end of communism, resulting in international resolutions, establishment of research institutes and museums, and the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism. The declaration also states that communist regimes did not commit genocides, citing the 1948 Genocide Convention which restricts genocide to mass killings related to ethnicity, race, nationality, or religion. The declaration claims that the Holocaust was unique, a subject of some debate. The declaration was signed by 70, mostly leftist, parliamentarians from Europe. It was released on the 70th anniversary of the Wannsee Conference in Berlin.

Waldemar Gurian was a Russian-born German-American political scientist, author, and professor at the University of Notre Dame. He is regarded particularly as a theorist of totalitarianism. He wrote widely on political Catholicism.

<i>Rahel Varnhagen</i> (book) Hannah Arendts biography of Rahel Varnhagen

Rahel Varnhagen: The Life of a Jewess is a book-length biography of Rahel Varnhagen written by political philosopher Hannah Arendt. Originally her Habilitationsschrift she completed it in exile as a refugee, but was not published till 1957, in English, in the UK (London) by East and West Library.

References

  1. Blumenthal-Barby, Martin (2009). ""The Odium of Doubtfulness"; or, The Vicissitudes of Metaphorical Thinking". New German Critique (106): 61–81. ISSN   0094-033X. JSTOR   27669255. Archived from the original on 2024-02-16. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Betz, Joseph (1992). "An Introduction to the Thought of Hannah Arendt". Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 28 (3): 379–422. ISSN   0009-1774. JSTOR   40320369. Archived from the original on 2023-05-27. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  3. Quarterly, Social Research An Int'l (2002-07-01). "HANNAH ARENDT'S THE ORIGINS OF TOTALITARIANISM: Fifty Years Later / Vo". socres. Archived from the original on 2024-02-16. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  4. Devlin, Nicholas (2023). "Hannah Arendt and Marxist Theories of Totalitarianism". Modern Intellectual History. 20 (1): 247–269. doi: 10.1017/S1479244321000603 . ISSN   1479-2443.
  5. Chaput, Sylvie (1982). "Hannah Arendt : la nécessité historique est une superstition". Nuit Blanche (in French) (7): 36–37. ISSN   0823-2490. Archived from the original on 2024-02-16. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  6. Tassin, Étienne (1997). "Hannah Arendt Et La Spécificité Du Totalitarisme". Revue Française d'Histoire des Idées Politiques (6): 367–388. ISSN   1266-7862. JSTOR   24610297. Archived from the original on 2024-02-17. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  7. 1 2 3 "La structure de l'organisation totalitaire est celle d'un oignon, dont chaque couche a une face radicale tournée vers le centre et une face normale tournée vers l'extérieur". www.idixa.net. Archived from the original on 2024-02-16. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  8. Ménissier, Thierry (2016), Comment assumer l'inconsistance du réel ? Penser avec Arendt la crise de l'autorité politique moderne (in French), Presses Universitaires de France, archived from the original on 2024-02-17, retrieved 2024-02-18
  9. Featherstone, Mark (2020). "Towards a Bureaucracy of the Body". New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics. 100 (100): 97–113. ISSN   1741-0789.
  10. Hannah Arendt, les juristes et le concept de totalitarisme. Éditions Kimé. 2020-12-01. doi:10.3917/kime.schul.2020.01. ISBN   978-2-84174-989-8. Archived from the original on 2024-02-17. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  11. 1 2 3 Aschheim, Steven E. (1997). "Nazism, Culture and The Origins of Totalitarianism: Hannah Arendt and the Discourse of Evil". New German Critique (70): 117. doi:10.2307/488501. JSTOR   488501. Archived from the original on 2024-02-17. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  12. O'sullivan, N. K. (1973). "Politics, Totalitarianism and Freedom: The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt". Political Studies. 21 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01427.x. ISSN   0032-3217. Archived from the original on 2024-02-18. Retrieved 2024-02-18.
  13. Monnet, Livia (2001). Approches critiques de la pensée japonaise du xxe siècle (in French). Presses de l’Université de Montréal. doi:10.4000/books.pum.19848. ISBN   978-2-7606-1784-1. Archived from the original on 2024-02-17. Retrieved 2024-02-18.