This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page . (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| OpenClaw | |
|---|---|
| | |
| Developer | Peter Steinberger |
| Initial release | November 2025 |
| Written in | TypeScript, Swift |
| Operating system | Cross-platform |
| Type | Autonomous personal assistant |
| License | MIT license |
| Website | openclaw |
| Repository | |
OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot and Moltbot) is a free and open-source autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) agent developed by Peter Steinberger. It is an autonomous agent that can execute tasks via large language models, using messaging platforms as its main user interface.
OpenClaw achieved popularity in late-January 2026, credited to its open source nature and the viral popularity of the Moltbook project.
The project was originally published in November 2025 by Austrian vibe coder Peter Steinberger, under the name Clawdbot. The software was derived from Clawd (now Molty), an AI-based virtual assistant that he had developed, which itself was named after Anthropic's chatbot Claude. [1] It was renamed "Moltbot" (keeping with a lobster theme) on January 27, 2026, following trademark complaints by Anthropic, and again to "OpenClaw" three days later after Steinberger found that the name Moltbot "never quite rolled off the tongue." [2] [3]
Alongside the first rebranding, entrepreneur Matt Schlicht launched Moltbook—a social networking service designed exclusively to be used by AI agents such as OpenClaw. The viral popularity of Moltbook, as well as OpenClaw's free and open-source (FOSS) licensing, increased interest in the project, leading it to amass over 145,000 stars and 20,000 forks on GitHub, and to be adopted by companies in Silicon Valley and China (where developers adapted it to work with the DeepSeek model and domestic super-apps). [4] [2] [5]
OpenClaw serves as an agentic interface for autonomous workflows across supported services. OpenClaw bots run locally and are designed to integrate with an external large language model such as Claude, DeepSeek, or one of OpenAI's GPT models. Its functionality is accessed via a chatbot within a messaging service, such as Signal, Telegram, Discord, or WhatsApp. Configuration data and interaction history is stored locally, enabling persistent and adaptive behavior across sessions. [4] [2] [6] [5]
Steinberger describes OpenClaw as "[an] AI that actually does things", and marketed it as an AI-based virtual assistant. [1]
OpenClaw's design has drawn scrutiny from cybersecurity researchers and technology journalists due to the broad permissions it requires to function effectively. Because the software can access email accounts, calendars, messaging platforms, and other sensitive services, misconfigured or exposed instances present security and privacy risks. [7] [4]
Cisco's AI security research team tested a third-party OpenClaw skill and found it performed data exfiltration and prompt injection without user awareness, noting that the skill repository lacked adequate vetting to prevent malicious submissions. [8] One of OpenClaw's own maintainers, known as Shadow, warned on Discord that "if you can't understand how to run a command line, this is far too dangerous of a project for you to use safely." [9]
Some commentary[ which? ] emphasized that while the tool itself is open source and developed with legitimate purposes, its powerful capabilities could be misused if deployed without appropriate security measures or understanding of the risks involved. [7] [10]
A review in Platformer cited OpenClaw's flexibility and open-source licensing as strengths while cautioning that its complexity and security risks limit its suitability for casual users. [11]
Technology commentary has linked OpenClaw to a broader trend toward autonomous AI systems that act independently rather than merely responding to user prompts. [10] [11]