Politicisation

Last updated

Politicisation (also politicization; see English spelling differences) is a concept in political science and theory used to explain how ideas, entities or collections of facts are given a political tone or character, and are consequently assigned to the ideas and strategies of a particular group or party, thus becoming the subject of contestation. Politicisation has been described as compromising objectivity, [1] and is linked with political polarisation. [2] [3] Conversely, it can have a democratising effect and enhance political choice, [4] and has been shown to improve the responsiveness of supranational institutions such as the European Union. [5] The politicisation of a group is more likely to occur when justifications for political violence are considered acceptable within a society, or in the absence of norms condemning violence. [6]

Contents

Depoliticisation, the reverse process, is when issues are no longer the subject of political contestation. It is characterised by governance through consensus-building and pragmatic compromise. [7] It occurs when subjects are left to experts, such as technocratic or bureaucratic institutions, or left to individuals and free markets, through liberalisation or deregulation. It is often connected with multi-level governance. [8] The concept has been used to explain the "democratic gap" between politicians and citizens who lack choice, agency and opportunities for deliberation. [9] In the 21st century, depoliticisation has been linked to disillusionment with neoliberalism. [10] Depoliticisation has negative consequences for regime legitimacy, [11] and produces anti-political sentiment associated with populism, which can result in "repoliticisation" (politicisation following depoliticisation). [12] [13]

Current studies of politicisation are separated into various subfields. It is primarily examined on three separate levels: within national political systems, within the European Union and within international institutions. [14] Academic approaches vary greatly and are frequently disconnected. It has been studied from subdisciplines such as comparative politics, political sociology, European studies and legal theory. [15]

The politicisation of science occurs when actors stress the inherent uncertainty of scientific method to challenge scientific consensus, undermining the positive impact of science on political debate by causing citizens to dismiss scientific evidence. [16]

Definitions

The dominant academic framework for understanding politicisation is the systems model, which sees politics as an arena or sphere. [17] In this perspective, politicisation is the process by which issues or phenomena enter the sphere of "the political", a space of controversy and conflict. [18] Alternatively, in the behaviouralist approach to political science, which sees politics as action or conflict, politicisation is conceptualised as the process by which an issue or phenomenon becomes significantly more visible in the collective consciousness, causing political mobilisation. [18]

In the systems model, depoliticisation is seen as "arena-shifting": removing issues from the political sphere by placing them outside the direct control or influence of political institutions, such as legislatures and elected politicians, [19] thereby denying or minimising their political nature. [18] In the behaviouralist model, depoliticisation indicates the reduction of popular interest in an issue, a weakening of participation in the public sphere and the utilisation of power to prevent opposition. [18]

Theory

Comparative politics (national level)

Majoritarian and non-majoritarian institutions in Taiwan
Zhong Hua Min Guo Li Fa Yuan (Yi Chang Nei ) Legislative Yuan of the Republic of China (chamber, interior).jpg
Members of the Legislative Yuan of the Republic of China are appointed through direct elections held every four years.
Interior in Constitutional Court, Judicial Yuan 20090706.jpg
Constitutional Court judges are appointed for life and cannot be removed from office. Safeguards prevent political interference.

Majoritarian institutions, [lower-alpha 1] such as parliaments (legislatures) and political parties, are associated with politicisation because they represent popular sovereignty and their agents are subject to short-term political considerations, particularly the need to compete for votes ("vote-seeking") by utilising populist rhetoric and policies. [20] [21] Non-majoritarian institutions, such as constitutional courts, central banks and international organisations, are neither directly elected nor directly managed by elected officials, and are connected with depoliticisation as they tend towards moderation and compromise. [22]

Declines in voter turnout, political mobilisation and political party membership, trends present in most OECD countries from the 1960s onwards, [23] reflect depoliticisation. A number of causes for this shift have been suggested. The growth of big tent political parties (parties which aim to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters) resulted in reduced polarisation and centralised decision-making, with increased compromise and bargaining. [23] In postwar Europe, the development of neo-corporatism led to political bargaining between powerful employers' organizations, trade unions and the government in a system known as tripartism, within which cartel parties could successfully prevent competition from newer parties. [24] Globally during the late 20th century, central banks and constitutional courts became increasingly important. [24]

Robert Dahl argued that these processes risked producing alienation because they created a professionalised form of politics that was "anti-ideological" and "too remote and bureaucratized". [25] Other contemporary scholars saw depoliticisation as a positive indication of dealignment and democratic maturity, as political competition came to be dominated by issues rather than cleavages. [24] In the early 21st century, theorists such as Colin Crouch and Chantal Mouffe argued that low participation was not the result of satisfaction with political systems, but the consequence of low confidence in institutions and political representatives; in 2007, Colin Hay explicitly linked these studies with the concept of politicisation. [24]

Since the 1990s, a process of "repoliticisation" has occurred on the national level, marked by the growth of right-wing populist parties in Europe, increased polarisation in American politics and higher voter turnout. [26] The divide between the winners and losers of globalisation and neoliberalism is hypothesised to have played a major role in this process, having replaced class conflict as the primary source of politicisation. [27] [28] Sources of conflict along this line include an "integration–demarcation" cleavage (between the losers of globalisation, who favour protectionism and nationalism, and the winners of globalisation, who prefer increased competition, open borders and internationalism); [29] and a similar "cosmopolitan–communitarian" cleavage (which places additional emphasis on a cultural divide between supporters of universal norms and those who believe in cultural particularism). [30]

Disillusionment with neoliberal policies has also been cited as a factor behind the processes of depoliticisation and repoliticisation, particularly through the lens of public choice theory. In 2001, Peter Burnham argued that in the UK the New Labour administration of Tony Blair used depoliticisation as a governing strategy, presenting contentious neoliberal reforms as non-negotiable "constraints" in order to lower political expectations, [31] thus creating apathy and submission among the electorate and facilitating the emergence of "anti-politics". [10]

Neo-Marxist, radical democratic and anti-capitalist critiques aim to repoliticise what they describe as neoliberal society, arguing that Marx's theory of alienation can be used to explain depoliticisation. [32]

European studies (European Union)

In post-functionalist theory, the politicisation of the EU is seen as a threat to integration because it constrains executive decision makers in member states due to domestic partisanship, fear of referendum defeat and the electoral repercussions of European policies, ultimately preventing political compromise on the European level. [33]

The EU has experienced politicisation over time however it has been at an increased rate since the early 2000's due to the series of crises. At a national level within its member states, a rise in populism has contributed to volatile party politics and the election of anti-EU representatives. Due to the EU's increasing involvement and influence in controversial policy issues as it strives for further integration, there is a rise in the contestational nature of interactions between EU agents. After dissatisfaction with governance, rising populist challengers have grown the cleavages in electoral divides.[ citation needed ]

International relations (international level)

Government agencies

Politicisation of science

Climate science

COVID-19 pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the politicisation of investigations into the origin of COVID-19 led to geopolitical tension between the United States and China, the growth of anti-Asian rhetoric and the bullying of scientists. [34] Some scientists said that politicisation could obstruct global efforts to suppress the virus and prepare for future pandemics. [34] Political scientists Giuliano Bobba and Nicolas Hubé have argued that the pandemic strengthened populist politicians by providing an opportunity for them to promote policies such as tighter border controls, anti-elitism and restriction of public freedoms. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

Civic Platform is a centre-right liberal political party in Poland. Since 2021, it is led by Donald Tusk, who previously led it from 2003–2014 and former president of the European Council from 2014–2019.

Neoliberalism, also neo-liberalism, is a term used to signify the late-20th century political reappearance of 19th-century ideas associated with free-market capitalism after it fell into decline following the Second World War. A prominent factor in the rise of conservative and right-libertarian organizations, political parties, and think tanks, and predominantly advocated by them, it is generally associated with policies of economic liberalization, including privatization, deregulation, globalization, free trade, monetarism, austerity, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society. The neoliberal project is also focused on designing institutions and has a political dimension. The defining features of neoliberalism in both thought and practice have been the subject of substantial scholarly debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Populism</span> Political philosophy

Populism is a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group with "the elite". It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment. The term developed in the late 19th century and has been applied to various politicians, parties and movements since that time, often as a pejorative. Within political science and other social sciences, several different definitions of populism have been employed, with some scholars proposing that the term be rejected altogether.

Political polarization is the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes.

Majoritarianism is a political philosophy or ideology with the agenda asserting that a majority based on a religion, language, social class, or other category of the population, is entitled to a certain degree of primacy in society, and has the right to make decisions that affect the society. This traditional view has come under growing criticism, and liberal democracies have increasingly included constraints on what the parliamentary majority can do, in order to protect citizens' fundamental rights.

An illiberal democracy describes a governing system that hides its "nondemocratic practices behind formally democratic institutions and procedures". There is a lack of consensus among experts about the exact definition of illiberal democracy or whether it even exists.

Sovereigntism, sovereignism or souverainism is the notion of having control over one's conditions of existence, whether at the level of the self, social group, region, nation or globe. Typically used for describing the acquiring or preserving political independence of a nation or a region, a sovereigntist aims to "take back control" from perceived powerful forces, either against internal subversive minority groups, or from external global governance institutions, federalism and supranational unions. It generally leans instead toward isolationism, and can be associated with certain independence movements, but has also been used to justify violating the independence of other nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right-wing populism</span> Combination of right-wing politics and populist themes

Right-wing populism, also called national populism and right-wing nationalism, is a political ideology that combines right-wing politics and populist rhetoric and themes. Its rhetoric employs anti-elitist sentiments, opposition to the Establishment, and speaking to or for the "common people". Recurring themes of right-wing populists include neo-nationalism, social conservatism, economic nationalism and fiscal conservatism. Frequently, they aim to defend a national culture, identity, and economy against perceived attacks by outsiders. Right-wing populism has remained the dominant political force in the Republican Party in the United States since the 2010s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cleavage (politics)</span> Sociological concept

In political science and sociology, a cleavage is a historically determined social or cultural line which divides citizens within a society into groups with differing political interests, resulting in political conflict among these groups. Social or cultural cleavages thus become political cleavages once they get politicized as such. Cleavage theory accordingly argues that political cleavages predominantly determine a country's party system as well as the individual voting behavior of citizens, dividing them into voting blocs. It is distinct from other common political theories on voting behavior in the sense that it focuses on aggregate and structural patterns instead of individual voting behaviors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal democracy</span> Political philosophy and form of government

Liberal democracy, substantive democracy, or western democracy is a form of government that combines the structure of a representative democracy with the principles of liberal political philosophy. It is characterized by elections between multiple distinct political parties, a separation of powers into different branches of government, the rule of law in everyday life as part of an open society, a market economy with private property, universal suffrage, and the equal protection of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and political freedoms for all people. To define the system in practice, liberal democracies often draw upon a constitution, either codified or uncodified, to delineate the powers of government and enshrine the social contract. The purpose of a constitution is often seen as a limit on the authority of the government.

Far-left politics, also known as the radical left or extreme left, are politics further to the left on the left–right political spectrum than the standard political left. The term does not have a single, coherent definition; some scholars consider it to represent the left of social democracy, while others limit it to the left of communist parties. In certain instances—especially in the news media—far left has been associated with some forms of authoritarianism, anarchism, communism, and Marxism, or are characterized as groups that advocate for revolutionary socialism and related communist ideologies, or anti-capitalism and anti-globalization. Far-left terrorism consists of extremist, militant, or insurgent groups that attempt to realize their ideals through political violence rather than using democratic processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Left-wing populism</span> Political ideology that combines left-wing politics and populist rhetoric and themes

Left-wing populism, also called social populism, is a political ideology that combines left-wing politics with populist rhetoric and themes. Its rhetoric often consists of anti-elitism, opposition to the Establishment, and speaking for the "common people". Recurring themes for left-wing populists include economic democracy, social justice, and scepticism of globalization. Socialist theory plays a lesser role than in traditional left-wing ideologies.

Post-politics refers to the critique of the emergence, in the post-Cold War period, of a politics of consensus on a global scale: the dissolution of the Eastern Communist bloc following the collapse of the Berlin Wall instituted a promise for post-ideological consensus. The political development in post-communist countries went two different directions depending on the approach each of them take on dealing with the communist party members. Active decommunisation process took place in Eastern European states which later joined EU. While in Russia and majority of former USSR republics communists became one of many political parties on equal grounds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanja Börzel</span> German political scientist

Tanja A. Börzel is a German political scientist. Her research and teaching focus on the fields of European Integration, Governance, and Diffusion. She is professor of Political Science at the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science of Freie Universität Berlin, director of the Center for European Integration, and holder of the Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration from 2006 until 2009. Currently, she is department chair of the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-politics</span> Distrust of traditional politics

Anti-politics is a term used to describe opposition to, or distrust in, traditional politics. It is closely connected with anti-establishment sentiment and public disengagement from formal politics. Anti-politics can indicate practices and actors that seek to remove political contestation from the public arena, leading to political apathy among citizens; when used this way the term is similar to depoliticisation. Alternatively, if politics is understood as encompassing all social institutions and power relations, anti-politics can mean political activity stemming from a rejection of "politics as usual".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding</span> Liberal democracies becoming authoritarian

Democratic backsliding is a process of regime change towards autocracy that makes the exercise of political power by the public more arbitrary and repressive. This process typically restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic decline involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive Slovakia</span> Social-liberal political movement in Slovakia

Progressive Slovakia is a liberal and social-liberal political party in Slovakia established in 2017. The party is led by Vice President of the European Parliament Michal Šimečka. It is a member of the Renew Europe group and is a full member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party. PS has three MEPs: Michal Šimečka, Martin Hojsík, and Michal Wiezik ; Wiezik left the EPP group and Spolu to join PS. Zuzana Čaputová, incumbent President of Slovakia, co-founder and former deputy leader of Progressive Slovakia who won the 2019 Slovak presidential election, was nominated by the party for the election, focusing her campaign on themes of anti-corruption, environmentalism and Pro-Europeanism. In the National Council, it was first represented by deputy Tomáš Valášek elected for For the People, which he left in 2021. In local politics, PS has a dominant position in Bratislava, cooperating with Team Bratislava and Freedom and Solidarity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confederation Liberty and Independence</span> Political party and coalition in Poland

The Confederation Liberty and Independence, frequently shortened to just Confederation, is a far-right political alliance in Poland. It was initially founded in 2018 as a political coalition for the 2019 European Parliament election in Poland, although it was later expanded into a political party in order to circumvent the 8% vote threshold for coalitions to enter the national parliament. It won 11 seats in the Sejm after the 2019 Polish parliamentary election. Its candidate for the 2020 Polish presidential election was Krzysztof Bosak, who placed fourth among eleven candidates.

Techno-populism is either a populism in favor of technocracy or a populism concerning certain technology – usually information technology – or any populist ideology conversed using digital media. It can be employed by single politicians or whole political movements respectively. Neighboring terms used in a similar way are technocratic populism, technological populism and cyber-populism. Italy’s Five Star Movement and France’s La République En Marche! have been described as technopopulist political movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-gender movement</span> International movement opposed to an alleged gender ideology

The anti-gender movement is an international movement that opposes what it refers to as "gender ideology", "gender theory" or "genderism", terms which cover a variety of issues and do not have a coherent definition. Members of the anti-gender movement primarily include those of the political right-wing and far right, such as right-wing populists, conservatives, and Christian fundamentalists. Anti-gender rhetoric has seen increasing circulation in trans-exclusionary radical feminist (TERF) discourse since 2016. Members of the anti-gender movement oppose some LGBT rights, some reproductive rights, government gender policies, gender equality, gender mainstreaming, and gender studies academic departments.

References

Notes

  1. ↑ 'Majoritarian' is frequently used to describe plurality voting systems; Majoritarianism, referred to here in the context of majoritarian and non-majoritarian institutions, is the idea that an authority's legitimacy stems from the will of a numerical majority of those subject to it.

Citations

  1. ↑ Pillar 2010, pp. 471–473.
  2. ↑ Wiesner 2021, p. 24.
  3. ↑ Chinn, Hart & Soroka 2020, pp. 119–125.
  4. ↑ Anders, Lisa H. "Dissensus, Deadlock, and Disintegration? Examining the Effects of EU Politicisation". In Wiesner (2021), pp. 179–180.
  5. ↑ Zürn 2019, p. 984.
  6. ↑ Henderson, Errol A. (2008). "Ethnic Conflicts and Cooperation". In Kurtz, Lester (ed.). Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict (2nd ed.). Academic Press. pp. 746–758. doi:10.1016/B978-012373985-8.00062-3. ISBN   9780123739858. Politicization is more likely when normative justifications for political violence persist or when norms condemning violence are absent.
  7. ↑ Robert, Cécile. "Depoliticisation at the European Level: Delegitimisation and Circumvention of Representative Democracy in Europe’s Governance". In Wiesner (2021), p. 212.
  8. ↑ Zürn 2019, pp. 979–980.
  9. ↑ Fawcett et al. 2017, pp. 3–6.
  10. 1 2 Fawcett et al. 2017, p. 9.
  11. ↑ Robert, Cécile. "Depoliticisation at the European Level: Delegitimisation and Circumvention of Representative Democracy in Europe’s Governance". In Wiesner (2021), pp. 201–212.
  12. ↑ Fawcett et al. 2017, p. 3–4.
  13. ↑ Scott 2021, pp. 11–14.
  14. ↑ Zürn 2019, p. 977.
  15. ↑ Wiesner 2021, p. 2.
  16. ↑ Bolsen & Druckman 2015, pp. 745–750.
  17. ↑ Wiesner 2021, pp. 4–5.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Bobba & Hubé 2021, p. 8.
  19. ↑ Flinders & Buller 2006, pp. 295–297.
  20. ↑ Flinders & Buller 2006, pp. 298–299.
  21. ↑ Zürn 2019, p. 988.
  22. ↑ Zürn 2019, pp. 980, 988–989.
  23. 1 2 Zürn 2019, p. 979.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Zürn 2019, p. 980.
  25. ↑ Dahl 1965, pp. 21–24.
  26. ↑ Zürn 2019, p. 981.
  27. ↑ Zürn 2019, pp. 980–981.
  28. ↑ de Wilde et al. 2019, pp. 1–3.
  29. ↑ Kriesi et al. 2008, p. 9.
  30. ↑ de Wilde et al. 2019, pp. 3–6.
  31. ↑ Burnham 2001, pp. 144–146.
  32. ↑ Chari 2015, pp. 91–93.
  33. ↑ Hooghe & Marks 2009, pp. 21–23.
  34. 1 2 Maxmen 2021, p. 15–16.
  35. ↑ Bobba & Hubé 2021, p. 11.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.