Neo-Marxism

Last updated

Neo-Marxism is a collection of Marxist schools of thought originating from 20th-century approaches [1] [2] [3] to amend or extend [4] Marxism and Marxist theory, typically by incorporating elements from other intellectual traditions such as critical theory, psychoanalysis, or existentialism. Neo-Marxism comes under the broader framework of the New Left. In a sociological sense, neo-Marxism adds Max Weber's broader understanding of social inequality, such as status and power, to Marxist philosophy.

Contents

As with many uses of the prefix neo- , some theorists and groups who are designated as neo-Marxists have attempted to supplement the perceived deficiencies of orthodox Marxism or dialectical materialism. [5] Many prominent neo-Marxists, such as Herbert Marcuse [6] and other members of the Frankfurt School, have historically been sociologists and psychologists. [7] [8]

Examples of neo-Marxism include analytical Marxism, French structural Marxism, political Marxism, critical theory, cultural studies, as well as some forms of feminism. Erik Olin Wright's [9] theory of contradictory class locations is an example of the syncretism found in neo-Marxist thought, as it incorporates Weberian sociology, and critical criminology. [10]

There is some ambiguity surrounding the difference between neo-Marxism and post-Marxism, [11] [12] with many thinkers being considered both. [13] [14] Prominent neo-Marxist journals include Spectre, [15] Historical Materialism, [16] New Left Review , Rethinking Marxism , [17] Capital & Class , [18] Salvage, [19] Cultural Logic [20] and the Seminar in Contemporary Marxism. [21]

History

Neo-Marxism developed as a result of social and political problems that traditional Marxist theory was unable to sufficiently address. [22]

Following World War I, some neo-Marxists dissented and later formed the Frankfurt School. The Frankfurt School never identified themselves as neo-Marxists. Toward the end of the 20th century, neo-Marxism and other Marxist theories became anathema in democratic and capitalistic Western cultures, where the term attained negative connotations during the Red Scare. For this reason, social theorists of the same ideology since that time have tended to disassociate themselves from the term neo-Marxism. [23]

Thinkers

Neo-Marxist feminism

Some portions of Marxist feminism have used the neo-Marxist label. [68] [69] This school of thought believes that the means of knowledge, culture, and pedagogy are part of a privileged epistemology. Neo-Marxist feminism relies heavily on critical theory and seeks to apply those theories in psychotherapy as the means of political and cultural change. Teresa McDowell and Rhea Almeida use these theories in a therapy method called "liberation based healing", which, like many other forms of Marxism, uses sample bias in the many interrelated liberties in order to magnify the "critical consciousness" of the participants towards unrest of the status quo. [69] [70] [71] [68]

Neo-Marxian economics

New Symbolization Project, a critical theory club at Boise State University, held the first sustained, multi-disciplinary academic response to the Jordan Peterson phenomenon in late October 2018; notable Marxist economist Richard D. Wolff and radical theologian Peter Rollins gave the keynotes. NewSymbolizationProjectJordanPetersonConventionLogistics.jpg
New Symbolization Project, a critical theory club at Boise State University, held the first sustained, multi-disciplinary academic response to the Jordan Peterson phenomenon in late October 2018; notable Marxist economist Richard D. Wolff and radical theologian Peter Rollins gave the keynotes.

The terms "neo-Marxian", "post-Marxian", and "radical political economics" were first used to refer to a distinct tradition of economic theory in the 1970s and 1980s that stems from Marxian economic thought. Many of the leading figures were associated with the leftist Monthly Review School. The neo-Marxist approach to development economics is connected with dependency and world systems theories. In these cases, the 'exploitation' that classifies it as Marxist is an external one, rather than the normal 'internal' exploitation of classical Marxism. [4] [72]

In industrial economics, the neo-Marxian approach stresses the monopolistic and oligarchical rather than the competitive nature of capitalism. [73] This approach is associated with Michał Kalecki, [74] Paul A. Baran, and Paul Sweezy. [75] [73]

Such theorists as Samuel Bowles, [76] [77] David Gordon, John Roemer, Herbert Gintis, Jon Elster, and Adam Przeworski have adopted the techniques of neoclassical economics, including game theory and mathematical modeling, to demonstrate Marxian concepts such as exploitation and class conflict. [78]

The neo-Marxian approach integrated non-Marxist or "bourgeois" economics from the post-Keynesians like Joan Robinson and the neo-Ricardian school of Piero Sraffa. Polish economists Michał Kalecki, Rosa Luxemburg, Henryk Grossman, Adam Przeworski, and Oskar Lange were influential in this school, particularly in developing theories of underconsumption. While most official communist parties denounced neo-Marxian theories as "bourgeois economics", some neo-Marxians served as advisers to socialist or Third World developing governments. Neo-marxist theories were also influential in the study of Imperialism.

Concepts

Big business can maintain selling prices at high levels while still competing to cut costs, advertise and market their products. However, competition is generally limited with a few large capital formations sharing various markets, with the exception of a few actual monopolies (such as the Bell System at the time). The economic surpluses that result cannot be absorbed through consumers spending more. The concentration of the surplus in the hands of the business elite must therefore be geared towards imperialistic and militaristic government tendencies, which is the easiest and surest way to utilise surplus productive capacity.

Exploitation focuses on low wage workers and groups at home, especially minorities. Average earners see the pressures in drive for production destroy their human relationships, leading to wider alienation and hostility. The whole system is largely irrational since though individuals may make rational decisions, the ultimate systemic goals are not. The system continues to function so long as Keynesian full employment policies are pursued, but there is the continued threat to stability from less-developed countries throwing off the restraints of neo-colonial domination.

Labor theory of value

Paul A. Baran introduced the concept of potential economic surplus to deal with novel complexities raised by the dominance of monopoly capital, in particular the theoretical prediction that monopoly capitalism would be associated with low capacity utilization, and hence potential surplus would typically be much larger than the realized surplus. With Paul Sweezy, Baran elaborated the importance of this innovation, its consistency with Marx's labor concept of value and supplementary relation to Marx's category of surplus value. [79]

According to Baran's categories:

  • Actual economic surplus: "the difference between what society's actual current output and its actual current consumption." Hence, it is equal to current savings or accumulation.
  • Potential economic surplus: "the difference between that output that could be produced in a given natural and technical environment with the help of employable productive resources, and what might be regarded as essential consumption".

Baran also introduced the concept of planned surplus—a category that could only be operationalized in a rationally planned socialist society. This was defined as "the difference between society's 'optimum' output available in a historically given natural and technological environment under conditions of planned 'optimal' utilization of all available productive resources, and some chosen 'optimal' volume of consumption." [80]

Baran used the surplus concept to analyze underdeveloped economies (or what are now more optimistically called "developing economies") in his Political Economy of Growth. [80]

Academic journals

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Sweezy</span> American Marxist economist (1910–2004)

Paul Marlor Sweezy was a Marxist economist, political activist, publisher, and founding editor of the long-running magazine Monthly Review. He is best remembered for his contributions to economic theory as one of the leading Marxian economists of the second half of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul A. Baran</span> American economist (1909–1964)

Paul Alexander Baran was an American Marxist economist. In 1951, Baran was promoted to full professor at Stanford University. He was the only tenured Marxian economist in the United States until his death in 1964. He wrote The Political Economy of Growth in 1957 and co-authored Monopoly Capital with Paul Sweezy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxism</span> Economic and sociopolitical worldview

Marxism is a political philosophy and method of socioeconomic analysis. It uses a dialectical and materialist interpretation of historical development, better known as historical materialism, to analyse class relations, social conflict, and social transformation. Marxism originates with the works of 19th-century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism has developed over time into various branches and schools of thought, and as a result, there is no single, definitive "Marxist theory". Marxism has had a profound effect in shaping the modern world, with various left-wing and far-left political movements taking inspiration from it in varying local contexts.

Critical international relations theory is a diverse set of schools of thought in international relations (IR) that have criticized the theoretical, meta-theoretical and/or political status quo, both in IR theory and in international politics more broadly – from positivist as well as postpositivist positions. Positivist critiques include Marxist and neo-Marxist approaches and certain ("conventional") strands of social constructivism. Postpositivist critiques include poststructuralist, postcolonial, "critical" constructivist, critical theory, neo-Gramscian, most feminist, and some English School approaches, as well as non-Weberian historical sociology, "international political sociology", "critical geopolitics", and the so-called "new materialism". All of these latter approaches differ from both realism and liberalism in their epistemological and ontological premises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Bellamy Foster</span> American academic (born 1953)

John Bellamy Foster is an American professor of sociology at the University of Oregon and editor of the Monthly Review. He writes about political economy of capitalism and economic crisis, ecology and ecological crisis, and Marxist theory. He has given numerous interviews, talks, and invited lectures, as well as written invited commentary, articles, and books on the subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of Marxism</span>

Criticism of Marxism has come from various political ideologies, campaigns and academic disciplines. This includes general intellectual criticism about dogmatism, a lack of internal consistency, criticism related to materialism, arguments that Marxism is a type of historical determinism or that it necessitates a suppression of individual rights, issues with the implementation of communism and economic issues such as the distortion or absence of price signals and reduced incentives. In addition, empirical and epistemological problems are frequently identified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard D. Wolff</span> American Marxian economist (born 1942)

Richard David Wolff is an American Marxian economist known for his work on economic methodology and class analysis. He is a professor emeritus of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and a visiting professor in the graduate program in international affairs of the New School. Wolff has also taught economics at Yale University, City University of New York, University of Utah, University of Paris I (Sorbonne), and The Brecht Forum in New York City.

Marxist geography is a strand of critical geography that uses the theories and philosophy of Marxism to examine the spatial relations of human geography. In Marxist geography, the relations that geography has traditionally analyzed — natural environment and spatial relations — are reviewed as outcomes of the mode of material production. To fully understand geographical relations, on this view, the social structure must also be examined. Marxist geography attempts to change the basic structure of society.

<i>Monopoly Capital</i> 1966 book by Paul Sweezy and Paul A. Baran

Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order is a 1966 book by the Marxian economists Paul Sweezy and Paul A. Baran. It was published by Monthly Review Press. It made a major contribution to Marxian theory by shifting attention from the assumption of a competitive economy to the monopolistic economy associated with the giant corporations that dominate the modern accumulation process. Their work played a leading role in the intellectual development of the New Left in the 1960s and 1970s. As a review in the American Economic Review stated, it represented "the first serious attempt to extend Marx’s model of competitive capitalism to the new conditions of monopoly capitalism." It attracted renewed attention following the Great Recession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Marxism</span> Marxist school of thought

Open Marxism is a collection of critical and heterodox Marxist schools of thought which critique state socialism and party politics, stressing the need for openness to praxis and history through an anti-positivist method grounded in the "practical reflexivity" of Karl Marx's own concepts. The "openness" in open Marxism also refers to a non-deterministic view of history in which the unpredictability of class struggle is foregrounded.

Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that originates in the works of 19th century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism analyzes and critiques the development of class society and especially of capitalism as well as the role of class struggles in systemic, economic, social and political change. It frames capitalism through a paradigm of exploitation and analyzes class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development – materialist in the sense that the politics and ideas of an epoch are determined by the way in which material production is carried on.

<i>The Theory of Capitalist Development</i> 1942 book by Paul Sweezy

The Theory of Capitalist Development is a 1942 book by the Marxian economist Paul Sweezy, in which the author expounds and defends the labor theory of value. It has received praise as an important work, but Sweezy has also been criticized for misrepresenting Karl Marx's economic theories.

<i>A General Theory of Exploitation and Class</i> 1982 book by John Roemer

A General Theory of Exploitation and Class is a 1982 book about the exploitation of labour and social class written by the economist and political scientist John Roemer. The book was first published in the United States by Harvard University Press.

<i>Marxs Revenge</i> 2002 book by Meghnad Desai

Marx's Revenge: The Resurgence of Capitalism and the Death of Statist Socialism is a 2002 book about the contemporary relevance of the philosopher Karl Marx by the economist Meghnad Desai.

Analytical Marxism is an academic school of Marxist theory which emerged in the late 1970s, largely prompted by G. A. Cohen's Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence (1978). In this book, Cohen drew on the Anglo–American tradition of analytic philosophy in an attempt to raise the standards of clarity and rigor within Marxist theory, which led to his distancing of Marxism from continental European philosophy. Analytical Marxism rejects much of the Hegelian and dialectical tradition associated with Marx's thought.

Post-Marxism is a perspective in critical social theory which radically reinterprets Marxism, countering its association with economism, historical determinism, anti-humanism, and class reductionism, whilst remaining committed to the construction of socialism. Most notably, Post-Marxists are anti-essentialist, rejecting the primacy of class struggle, and instead focus on building radical democracy. Post-Marxism can be considered a synthesis of post-structuralist frameworks and neo-Marxist analysis, in response to the decline of the New Left after the protests of 1968. In a broader sense, post-Marxism can refer to Marxists or Marxian-adjacent theories which break with the old worker's movements and socialist states entirely, in a similar sense to Post-leftism, and accept that the era of mass revolution premised on the Fordist worker is potentially over.

Marxian economics, or the Marxian school of economics, is a heterodox school of political economic thought. Its foundations can be traced back to Karl Marx's critique of political economy. However, unlike critics of political economy, Marxian economists tend to accept the concept of the economy prima facie. Marxian economics comprises several different theories and includes multiple schools of thought, which are sometimes opposed to each other; in many cases Marxian analysis is used to complement, or to supplement, other economic approaches. Because one does not necessarily have to be politically Marxist to be economically Marxian, the two adjectives coexist in usage, rather than being synonymous: They share a semantic field, while also allowing both connotative and denotative differences. An example of this can be found in the works of Soviet economists like Lev Gatovsky, who sought to apply Marxist economic theory to the objectives, needs, and political conditions of the socialist construction in the Soviet Union, contributing to the development of Soviet Political Economy.

Theories of imperialism are a range of theoretical approaches to understanding the expansion of capitalism into new areas, the unequal development of different countries, and economic systems that may lead to the dominance of some countries over others. These theories are considered distinct from other uses of the word imperialism which refer to the general tendency for empires throughout history to seek power and territorial expansion. The theory of imperialism is often associated with Marxist economics, but many theories were developed by non-Marxists. Most theories of imperialism, with the notable exception of ultra-imperialism, hold that imperialist exploitation leads to warfare, colonization, and international inequality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of Marxism</span> Overview of and topical guide to Marxism

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Marxism:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxist cultural analysis</span> Anti-capitalist cultural critique

Marxist cultural analysis is a form of cultural analysis and anti-capitalist cultural critique, which assumes the theory of cultural hegemony and from this specifically targets those aspects of culture that are profit driven and mass-produced under capitalism.

References

  1. 1 2 Ritzer, George; Schubert, J. Daniel (1991). "The Changing Nature of Neo-Marxist Theory: A Metatheoretical Analysis". Sociological Perspectives . 34 (3): 359–375. doi:10.2307/1389516. JSTOR   1389516. S2CID   146959219.
  2. ↑ Toscano, Alberto (2007). "Neo-Marxism". The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosn012. ISBN   978-1-4051-2433-1.
  3. ↑ Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2011). "International Relations Theory". In Kurian, George Thomas (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Vol. 3. CQ Press. pp. 829–831. doi:10.4135/9781608712434. ISBN   9781933116440.
  4. 1 2 Foster-Carter, Aidan (January 1973). "Neo-Marxist approaches to development and underdevelopment". Journal of Contemporary Asia . 3 (1): 7–33. doi:10.1080/00472337308566845.
  5. ↑ "Neo-Marxism". New Discourses. 2023-03-14. Retrieved 2023-05-17.
  6. ↑ Swedberg, Richard (March 1987). "The Neo-Marxist Contribution". Current Sociology . 35 (1): 78–91. doi:10.1177/001139287035001010. S2CID   145656368.
  7. ↑ Gunnell, John G. (2011). "Political Science, History of". In Kurian, George Thomas (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Vol. 4. CQ Press. pp. 1278–1286. ISBN   978-1-933116-44-0.
  8. ↑ Laberge, Yves (2011). "Protest Music". In Kurian, George Thomas (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Vol. 4. CQ Press. pp. 1374–1375. ISBN   978-1-933116-44-0.
  9. 1 2 Wright, Erik Olin (2005). "Foundations of a neo-Marxist class analysis". Approaches to Class Analysis. pp. 4–30. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488900.002. ISBN   978-0-521-84304-1. S2CID   143072329.
  10. ↑ Scott, John; Marshall, Gordon, eds. (1998). "neo-Marxism". A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford University Press.
  11. ↑ Barrow, Clyde W. (1993). Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neomarxist, Postmarxist. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN   978-0-299-13714-4.[ page needed ]
  12. ↑ "IV. Marxisms and Neo-Marxisms | Cultural Politics". culturalpolitics.net. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  13. ↑ "Hardt & Negri's 'Multitude': the worst of both worlds". openDemocracy . Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  14. ↑ Harrison, Oliver (2016). Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-317-06333-9.[ page needed ]
  15. ↑ "Spectre Journal". Spectre Journal. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  16. ↑ "About Us | Historical Materialism". www.historicalmaterialism.org. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  17. ↑ "Rethinking Marxism". rethinkingmarxism.org. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  18. ↑ "Sagepub".
  19. ↑ "About". Salvage. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  20. ↑ "About the Journal | Cultural Logic: A Journal of Marxist Theory & Practice". ojs.library.ubc.ca. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  21. ↑ London, King's College. "Contemporary Marxism Research Group". King's College London . Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  22. ↑ Althusser, Louis (15 December 2017). "The Crisis of Marxism (1977)". Viewpoint Magazine. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  23. ↑ Yates, Shaun (2014). Crime, Criminality & Social Revolution. UK: Clok. p. 44.
  24. ↑ "A little help from my neo-Marxist philosopher: was Adorno the fifth Beatle?". The Guardian . 10 September 2019.
  25. ↑ "Althusser and the Renewal of Marxist Social Theory". publishing.cdlib.org. Retrieved 2023-05-17.
  26. ↑ Folson, Kweku G. (1985). "Samir Amin as a Neo-Marxist". Africa Development / Afrique et Développement. 10 (3): 112–136. JSTOR   24495941.
  27. ↑ Brown, Douglas (9 January 2013). "Michael Apple, Social Theory, Critical Transcendence, and the New Sociology: An Essay". In Education. 17 (2). doi: 10.37119/ojs2011.v17i2.79 .
  28. ↑ "Balibar Étienne". Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. 19 April 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  29. ↑ Freeman, Samuel. "The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism".
  30. ↑ "Tithi Bhattacharya". Tithi Bhattacharya. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  31. ↑ Johnston, Paul (1985). "Review of Accumulation Crisis". Berkeley Journal of Sociology . 30: 213–223. ISSN   0067-5830. JSTOR   41035351.
  32. ↑ Thomas, Alan (2016). "G. A. Cohen's Neo-Marxist Critique of Rawls". Republic of Equals. pp. 68–94. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190602116.003.0003. ISBN   978-0-19-060211-6.
  33. ↑ Moolakkattu, John S. (October 2009). "Robert W. Cox and Critical Theory of International Relations". International Studies. 46 (4): 439–456. doi:10.1177/002088171004600404. S2CID   143270526.
  34. ↑ Ritzer, George (2005). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing. doi:10.4135/9781412952552. ISBN   978-0-7619-2611-5. OCLC   162126827.
  35. ↑ Wamp, Bailey (1 May 2015). Spectacle, Consumer Capitalism, and the Hyperreality of the Mediated American Jury Trial: the French Perspective on O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Masters). University of Tennessee.
  36. ↑ Stauffer, Jill (2001). "Review of The End of Human Rights". Journal of Law and Society . 28 (3): 459–463. JSTOR   3657993.
  37. ↑ Bowers, C. A. (January 1984). "The Problem of Individualism and Community in Neo-Marxist Educational Thought". Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 85 (3): 365–390. doi:10.1177/016146818408500307. S2CID   141113071.
  38. ↑ Au, Wayne (2015). "Just What the Hell is a Neo-Marxist Anyway?". Leaders in Critical Pedagogy. pp. 17–35. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-166-3_2. ISBN   978-94-6300-166-3.
  39. ↑ "Marxian Perspectives on Educational Philosophy: From Classical Marxism to Critical Pedagogy by Douglas Kellner". pages.gseis.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2023-05-17.
  40. ↑ Kaushik, Asha (1978). "The Neo-Marxist Framework of Erich Fromm". Indian Journal of Political Science . 39 (2): 202–209. ISSN   0019-5510. JSTOR   41854841.
  41. ↑ Ritzer, George; Schubert, J. Daniel (1991). "The Changing Nature of Neo-Marxist Theory: A Metatheoretical Analysis". Sociological Perspectives . 34 (3): 359–375. doi:10.2307/1389516. ISSN   0731-1214. JSTOR   1389516. S2CID   146959219.
  42. ↑ "Literature of Revolution". Verso Books . Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  43. ↑ Salamini, Leonardo (1975). "The Specificity of Marxist Sociology in Gramsci's Theory". The Sociological Quarterly . 16 (1): 65–86. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1975.tb02139.x. JSTOR   4105536.
  44. ↑ "'Selected Writings on Marxism' by Stuart Hall reviewed by Christian Lotz". marxandphilosophy.org.uk. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  45. ↑ Rankin, William (September 2020). "How the visual is spatial: Contemporary spatial history, neo-Marxism, and the ghost of Braudel". History and Theory . 59 (3): 311–342. doi:10.1111/hith.12162. S2CID   225219007.
  46. ↑ "The Frankfurt School". pages.gseis.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2023-05-17.
  47. ↑ Cha-Jua, Sundiata (1998). "C.L.R. James, Blackness, and the Making of a Neo-Marxist Diasporan Historiography" (PDF). Nature, Society & Thought . 11 (1): 53–89.
  48. ↑ Schulenberg, Ulf (2001). "Fredric Jameson's American Neo-Marxism and the Dialectics of Totality and Difference". Amerikastudien / American Studies. 46 (2): 281–299. JSTOR   41157649.
  49. ↑ "Fredric Jameson, biography by Douglas Kellner". pages.gseis.ucla.edu. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  50. ↑ Jessop, Bob (July 2001). "Bringing the State Back In (Yet Again): Reviews, Revisions, Rejections, and Redirections". International Review of Sociology. 11 (2): 149–173. doi:10.1080/713674035. S2CID   144308378.
  51. ↑ "Lefebvre, Henri (1901–91) - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy". www.rep.routledge.com. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  52. ↑ "Ecology & Marxism: Andreas Malm | Historical Materialism". www.historicalmaterialism.org. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  53. ↑ Stevenson, Nick (2 January 2022). "Herbert Marcuse as a Critical Intellectual: The New Left and Alternative Socialist Futures". Rethinking Marxism . 34 (1): 81–98. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2022.2026753 . S2CID   247475409.
  54. ↑ Freedman, Carl (November 2006). "Speculative fiction and international law: The Marxism of China Miéville". Socialism and Democracy . 20 (3): 25–39. doi:10.1080/08854300600950228. S2CID   144434833.
  55. ↑ Solo, Robert (1978). "The Neo-Marxist Theory of the State". Journal of Economic Issues . 12 (4): 829–842. doi:10.1080/00213624.1978.11503580. JSTOR   4224747.
  56. ↑ Warskett, Rosemary (2021). "Tribute to Leo Panitch, Organic Intellectual (1945–2021)". Labour / Le Travail . 88: 116–127. JSTOR   27098979.
  57. ↑ Przeworski, Adam (December 1985). "Marxism and Rational Choice". Politics & Society. 14 (4): 379–409. doi:10.1177/003232928501400401. ISSN   0032-3292. S2CID   154674006.
  58. ↑ Kieve, Ronald A. (1986). "From Necessary Illusion to Rational Choice?: A Critique of Neo-Marxist Rational-Choice Theory". Theory and Society . 15 (4): 557–582. doi:10.1007/BF00159268. ISSN   0304-2421. JSTOR   657211. S2CID   147610792.
  59. ↑ Neilson, David (June 2018). "In-itself for-itself: Towards second-generation neo-Marxist class theory". Capital & Class . 42 (2): 273–295. doi:10.1177/0309816817723299. S2CID   149081168.
  60. ↑ "Moishe Postone (1942-2018) | Historical Materialism". www.historicalmaterialism.org. 25 April 2018. Retrieved 2023-05-21.
  61. ↑ Ritzer, George (2005). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. doi:10.4135/9781412952552. ISBN   978-0-7619-2611-5.[ page needed ]
  62. ↑ "Los Angeles Review of Books". Los Angeles Review of Books. 8 January 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
  63. ↑ "Monopoly capitalism and neo-Marxism". www.nationalaffairs.com. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  64. ↑ "Chapter 8: Marxism And Neo-Marxism | Online Resources". study.sagepub.com. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  65. ↑ Young, James D. (1967). "Neo-Marxism and the British New Left" . Retrieved 17 May 2023– via Marxists Internet Archive.
  66. ↑ bloomsbury.com. "Raymond Williams and Education". Bloomsbury. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  67. ↑ Williams, Raymond. "Notes on British Marxism since 1945". New Left Review .
  68. 1 2 Zrenchik, Kyle; McDowell, Teresa (April 2012). "Class and Classism in Family Therapy Praxis: A Feminist, Neo-Marxist Approach". Journal of Feminist Family Therapy . 24 (2): 101–120. doi:10.1080/08952833.2012.648118. S2CID   145355235.
  69. 1 2 Almeida, Rhea. Cultural Context Model: A Liberation Based Healing Paradigm.[ page needed ]
  70. ↑ Mcdowell, Theresa. "Unsettling white stream pedagogy." 9th Annual Liberation Based Healing Conference. The Great White Project.
  71. ↑ McDowell, Theresa. "Valuing Ideas of Social Justice in MFT Curricula."
  72. ↑ Taylor, John (January 1974). "Neo-Marxism and Underdevelopment — A sociological phantasy". Journal of Contemporary Asia . 4 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/00472337485390021.
  73. 1 2 Nitzan, Jonathan, and Shimshon Bichler. 2009. Capital as power: a study of order and creorder . Taylor & Francis. p. 50.
  74. ↑ Kalecki, Michał. 1971. "Class Struggle and the Distribution of National Income [Lucha de clases y distribución del ingreso]." Kyklos 24(1).
  75. ↑ Baran, Paul A., and Paul Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order . New York: Monthly Review Press.
  76. ↑ Bowles, Samuel (September 1985). "Post-Marxian economics: labour, learning and history". Social Science Information. 24 (3): 507–528. doi:10.1177/053901885024003005. S2CID   143529772.
  77. ↑ Wolff, Richard D.; Cullenberg, Stephen (1986). "Marxism and Post-Marxism". Social Text (15): 126–135. doi:10.2307/466496. JSTOR   466496.
  78. ↑ Clark, Barry Stewart (1998). Political economy: a comparative approach. ABC-CLIO. p. 67. ISBN   9780275958695.
  79. ↑ Baran, Paul A.; Sweezy, Paul (1 July 2012). Foster, J. B. (ed.). "Some Theoretical Implications". Monthly Review . Vol. 64, no. 3.
  80. 1 2 Baran, Paul A. (1957). The Political Economy of Growth . New York: Monthly Review Press. pp.  22–23, 41–42. ISBN   978-0-14-021465-9.
  81. ↑ "Spectre Journal". Spectre Journal. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  82. ↑ "About Us | Historical Materialism". www.historicalmaterialism.org. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  83. ↑ "Rethinking Marxism". rethinkingmarxism.org. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  84. ↑ "Sagepub".
  85. ↑ "About". Salvage. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  86. ↑ "About the Journal | Cultural Logic: A Journal of Marxist Theory & Practice". ojs.library.ubc.ca. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  87. ↑ London, King's College. "Contemporary Marxism Research Group". King's College London . Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  88. ↑ "Radical Philosophy". Radical Philosophy. Retrieved 29 September 2024.

Sources

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.