Poverty in South Korea

Last updated

Poverty rate (after taxes and transfers) in South Korea equates to approximately 14.6% as of 2013 Poverty rate in South Korea.svg
Poverty rate (after taxes and transfers) in South Korea equates to approximately 14.6% as of 2013

Poverty in South Korea has been in drastic decline since the mid-20th century, particularly the absolute poverty rate. Relative poverty was also in decline until the late 1990s, rose in the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis, and has been in decline since the 2010s. While only about 2% of South Koreans are affected by absolute poverty today, about 14-15% of these 2% are elderly and are affected by relative poverty. Elderly relative poverty has been in consistent decline since 2011, according to the OECD.

Contents

The poverty rate of elderly people in South Korea is the highest among the OECD countries 2011 Poverty rate by age group in South Korea.svg
The poverty rate of elderly people in South Korea is the highest among the OECD countries
Poverty rate in South Korea (age 65+) in 2011 2011 Poverty rate in South Korea (age 65+).svg
Poverty rate in South Korea (age 65+) in 2011

Choo, Park and Yoon noted that both absolute and relative poverty have declined in Korea from 1965 to 1990. [1] They concluded that "rapid economic growth during [the analyzed period of 1960s-1980s] in Korea has alleviated poverty to a great extent". Philips et al. praised South Korea, noting that "South Korea has experienced one of the most dramatic declines in absolute poverty that the world has seen". [2] They added that while over half of the Korean population was affected by absolute poverty in mid-1950s, absolute poverty had declined to only about 3.4 percent of the population by the mid-1990s. [2] As of 2001, absolute poverty was below 2%[ citation needed ] (however, another estimate for 2000 cited 11.5% [3] ). However, more recent data suggests that relative poverty has been on the rise, growing from about 8% in the early 1990s to 15% as of 2012. [4]

According to official estimates, about 15% of South Koreans live below the poverty line. [5] Poverty in South Korea is defined as relative poverty. Relative poverty is not the same as absolute poverty: relative poverty measures the share of the population living on less than half of the median income. [4] (Median income in South Korea in 2007 was $19,179 (W20m). [6] ) About half of all citizens over the age of 65 are living in poverty, one of the highest rates among OECD countries. [4]

On November 15, 2021, according to reports, South Korea ranks fourth in the world in terms of relative poverty among major economies. [7]

Poverty among Korean elderly

In the rapidly aging demographics in South Korea, many elderly require healthcare. Studies taken across many demographics concluded that South Korean elderly with low income lack proper social protection from the government and are the most disadvantaged. In recent years “the proportion of aged 65 and older among people with disabilities has quickly increased, from 30.3% to 43.3% in 2014”. That makes South Korea the leader in this aspect as 3 times the growth as compared to the international average. [8] This is consistent with South Korea having one of the highest life expectancies, which has been growing in recent years.

26 percent of Korean elderly lived in poverty in 2008. [9]  Among OECD countries, the poverty risk is higher for South Korea's elderly. While the number of elders living in poverty increases every year for many countries, South Korea remains with the highest poverty rate of people aged over 65 among the OECD countries. [10] Moreover, the poverty risk is particularly high for the South Korean elderly who are less educated, living alone, living in a rural area, or are not in good health. Many low-income elderly individuals are currently living with their children, which are often providing them with financial aid, and many also depend on welfare transfers. [10] Overall, the poverty rate for the elderly has been consistently declining since 2011, according to OECD data.

Reasons for poverty

OECD listed several factors among the reasons for poverty in Korea. First, public social spending in South Korea is low. Social spending by the government in South Korea was 7.6% of GDP in 2007, compared to the OECD average of 19%. [4] This can be explained by the Korean traditional reliance on family and the private sector to provide such services. [4] Second, Korea's dualistic labour market, in which a significant number of workers are hired only on temporary contracts with low wages and benefits, results in high inequality in wage income. [4]

Income inequality

South Korea, along with many other East Asian countries, has been known for very equal distribution of income and wealth. However, this has been changing over the last few decades. Statistics show that in the 1990s, income equality reached a peak and has declined since then. This may be in part due to the country's rapid economic growth. [11] In a now more competitive job market, the head of the household or householder is expected to be more educated, which makes it hard for rural families to compete with a lack of access to higher education, subsequently resulting in income inequality between urban and rural areas. Some[ who? ] attribute income inequality to a change in traditional household head dynamics in South Korea. An increase in single headed households and a stiflingly low access to new jobs has created a financially challenging situations for many families in South Korea, leading many not to have families at all.[ citation needed ] Income inequality has been declining since 2016, according to OECD data.

Welfare state

Historically, South Korea harshly repressed trade unions. [12] Many trade unions and the opposition groups they represent have been shut down by the government. It was only within the last[ which? ] decade that a social security has been set up for the elderly, but many elderly still live in extreme poverty despite help from the government. South Korea has a comprehensive national healthcare for all of its citizens.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gini coefficient</span> Measure of inequality of a distribution

In economics, the Gini coefficient, also known as the Gini index or Gini ratio, is a measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent the income inequality, the wealth inequality, or the consumption inequality within a nation or a social group. It was developed by Italian statistician and sociologist Corrado Gini.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty threshold</span> Minimum income deemed adequate to live in a specific country or place

The poverty threshold, poverty limit, poverty line, or breadline is the minimum level of income deemed adequate in a particular country. The poverty line is usually calculated by estimating the total cost of one year's worth of necessities for the average adult. The cost of housing, such as the rent for an apartment, usually makes up the largest proportion of this estimate, so economists track the real estate market and other housing cost indicators as a major influence on the poverty line. Individual factors are often used to account for various circumstances, such as whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. The poverty threshold may be adjusted annually. In practice, like the definition of poverty, the official or common understanding of the poverty line is significantly higher in developed countries than in developing countries.

The basic needs approach is one of the major approaches to the measurement of absolute poverty in developing countries globally. It works to define the absolute minimum resources necessary for long-term physical well-being, usually in terms of consumption goods. The poverty line is then defined as the amount of income required to satisfy the needs of the people. The "basic needs" approach was introduced by the International Labour Organization's World Employment Conference in 1976. "Perhaps the high point of the WEP was the World Employment Conference of 1976, which proposed the satisfaction of basic human needs as the overriding objective of national and international development policy. The basic needs approach to development was endorsed by governments and workers' and employers' organizations from all over the world. It influenced the programmes and policies of major multilateral and bilateral development agencies, and was the precursor to the human development approach."

Poverty in Australia deals with the incidence of relative poverty in Australia and its measurement. Relative income poverty is measured as a percentage of the population that earns less in comparison to the median wage of the working population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child poverty</span> Children living in poverty

Child poverty refers to the state of children living in poverty and applies to children from poor families and orphans being raised with limited or no state resources. UNICEF estimates that 356 million children live in extreme poverty. It is estimated that 1 billion children lack at least one essential necessity such as housing, regular food, or clean water. Children are more than twice as likely to live in poverty as adults and the poorest children are twice as likely to die before the age of 5 compared to their wealthier peers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Measuring poverty</span> Overview about the measure of poverty

Poverty is measured in different ways by different bodies, both governmental and nongovernmental. Measurements can be absolute, which references a single standard, or relative, which is dependent on context. Poverty is widely understood to be multidimensional, comprising social, natural and economic factors situated within wider socio-political processes. The capabilities approach argues that capturing the perceptions of poor people is fundamental to understanding poverty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in China</span> Economic issues in China

In China today, poverty refers mainly to the rural poor. Decades of economic development has reduced urban extreme poverty. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.

Poverty in Canada refers to the state or condition in which a person or household lacks essential resources—financial or otherwise—to maintain a modest standard of living in their community.

The social safety net (SSN) consists of non-contributory assistance existing to improve lives of vulnerable families and individuals experiencing poverty and destitution. Examples of SSNs are previously-contributory social pensions, in-kind and food transfers, conditional and unconditional cash transfers, fee waivers, public works, and school feeding programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare's effect on poverty</span>

The effects of social welfare on poverty have been the subject of various studies.

The term juvenilization of poverty is one used to describe the processes by which children are at a higher risk for being poor, suffer consistent and long-term negative effects due to deprivation, and are disproportionately affected by systemic issues that perpetuate poverty. The term connotes not just the mere existence of child poverty but the increase in both relative and absolute measures of poverty among children as compared to both other vulnerable groups and the population at large.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in New Zealand</span> Overview of poverty in New Zealand

Poverty in New Zealand deals with the incidence of relative poverty in New Zealand and its measurement. Between 1982 and 2011, New Zealand's gross domestic product grew by 35%. Almost half of that increase went to a small group who were already the richest in the country. During this period, the average income of the top 10% of earners in New Zealand almost doubled going from $56,300 to $100,200. The average income of the poorest tenth increased by only 13% from $9700 to $11,000. Figures from 2016 show that about 15% of the population lives in poverty, compared to 9% in the 1980s, and 22% in 2004.

Sweden enjoys a relatively low income inequality and a high standard of living. Unemployment as of 2017 was estimated to be 6.6% by the CIA World Fact Book, lower than in other European Union countries. The Nordic model of a social welfare society exemplified by Sweden and its near neighbours has often been considered a European success story compared internationally with the socioeconomic structures of other developed industrial nations. This model of state provided social welfare includes many unemployment benefits for the poor, and amply funded health, housing and social security provision. within essentially corruption free nations subscribing to principles of a measure of openness of information about government activity. The Income inequality in Sweden ranks low in the Gini coefficient, being 25.2 as of 2015 which is one of the lowest in the world, and ranking similarly to the other Nordic countries; although inequality has recently been on the rise and several central European countries now have a lower Gini coefficient than Sweden.

Denmark has been noted as having one of the lowest income inequality ratings in the world and has been known to maintain relative stability in this metric throughout decades past. The OECD data of 2016 gives Denmark a Gini coefficient of 0.249, below the OECD average of 0.315. The OECD in 2013 ranked Denmark with having a 0.254 Gini coefficient, ranking third behind Iceland and Norway respectively as the countries with the lowest income inequality qualifications. Eurostat ranked Denmark with a Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income of 27.0 in 2022, having fallen for three straight years from a high of 27.8 in 2018. The Gini coefficients are measured using a 0–1 calibration where 0 equals complete equality and 1 equals complete inequality. "Wage-distributive outcomes" and their effect on income equality have been noted since the 1970s and 80s. Denmark, along with other Nordic countries, such as Finland and Sweden, has long held a stable low wage inequality index as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pension policy in South Korea</span>

South Korea's pension scheme was introduced relatively recently, compared to other democratic nations. Half of the country's population aged 65 and over lives in relative poverty, or nearly four times the 13% average for member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This makes old age poverty an urgent social problem. Public social spending by general government is half the OECD average, and is the lowest as a percentage of GDP among OECD member countries.

The spoon class theory refers to the idea that individuals in a country can be classified into different socioeconomic classes based on the assets and income level of their parents, and as a consequence, one's success in life depends entirely on being born into a wealthy family. The term appeared in 2015 and was first widely used among online communities in South Korea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic inequality in New Zealand</span> Overview of the economic inequality in New Zealand

Economic inequality in New Zealand is one of the social issues present in the country.

Poverty in Norway had been declining from World War II until the Global Financial Crisis. It is now increasing slowly, and is significantly higher among immigrants from the Middle East and Africa. Before an analysis of poverty can be undertaken, the definition of poverty must first be established, because it is a subjective term. The measurement of poverty in Norway deviates from the measurement used by the OECD. Norway traditionally has been a global model and leader in maintaining low levels on poverty and providing a basic standard of living for even its poorest citizens. Norway combines a free market economy with the welfare model to ensure both high levels of income and wealth creation and equal distribution of this wealth. It has achieved unprecedented levels of economic development, equality and prosperity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aging of South Korea</span> Overview of aging in South Korea

In South Korea, aging refers to an increase in the proportion of senior citizens to the total population. The term "senior citizens" include those aged 65 or older. According to Article 3 no.1 of the Framework Act on Low Birthrate of an Aging Society, the term "aging population" refers to the increasing proportion of elderly people in the entire population.

According to data from 2010, low-income earners make up 37.8% of South Korea's labour force. Conversely, the highest income earners make up 1.4% of the labour force.

References

  1. Choo, Hakchung; Bark, Soon-Il; Yoon, Suk Bum (1996). "Korea: Poverty in a Tiger Country". In Øyen, Else; Miller, Seymour Michael; Samad, Syed Abdus (eds.). Poverty: A Global Review. Scandinavian University Press. pp. 86–99. ISBN   978-82-00-22649-9.
  2. 1 2 Henderson, Jeffrey; Hulme, David; Phillips, Richard; Kim, Eun Mee (August 2002). "Economic Governance and Poverty Reduction in South Korea". CiteSeerX   10.1.1.198.7202 . S2CID   15379041.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. Kim, Yeon-Myung (February 2006). "Towards a comprehensive welfare state in South Korea: institutional features, new socio-economic and political pressures, and the possibility of the welfare state".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 OECD Economic Surveys of Korea, April 2012
  5. "Central Intelligence Agency". Cia.gov. 2009-10-20. Archived from the original on June 13, 2007. Retrieved 2013-01-18.
  6. "GE1. Household income". doi:10.1787/888932381684.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) from Society at a Glance 2011. 2011. doi:10.1787/soc_glance-2011-en. ISBN   978-92-64-09852-7.
  7. Kyung-don, Nam (2021-11-14). "[Graphic News] S. Korea ranks 4th in relative poverty among OECD nations". The Korea Herald . Retrieved 2021-11-15.
  8. Jeon, Boyoung; Noguchi, Haruko; Kwon, Soonman; Ito, Tomoko; Tamiya, Nanako (April 2017). "Disability, poverty, and role of the basic livelihood security system on health services utilization among the elderly in South Korea". Social Science & Medicine. 178: 175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.013 . PMID   28237862. S2CID   205218801.
  9. Lee, Jinkook; Phillips, Drystan (2012). "Income and Poverty Among Older Koreans: Relative Contributions of and Relationship Between Public and Family Transfers". The Family, the Market or the State?. pp. 99–121. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4339-7_5. ISBN   978-94-007-4338-0.
  10. 1 2 Youn, Hin Moi; Lee, Hyeon Ji; Lee, Doo Woong; Park, Eun-Cheol (December 2020). "The impact of poverty transitions on frailty among older adults in South Korea: findings from the Korean longitudinal study of ageing". BMC Geriatrics. 20 (1): 139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01522-x . PMC   7161157 . PMID   32293296.
  11. Ku, Inhoe; Lee, Wonjin; Lee, Seoyun; Han, Kyounghoon (June 2018). "The Role of Family Behaviors in Determining Income Distribution: The Case of South Korea". Demography. 55 (3): 877–899. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0670-y. PMC   5992242 . PMID   29693224. ProQuest   2030041713.
  12. Kim, Taekyoon; Kwon, Huck-Ju; Lee, Jooha; Yi, Ilcheong (2011). "Poverty, Inequality, and Democracy: "Mixed Governance" and Welfare in South Korea". Journal of Democracy. 22 (3): 120–134. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0037. S2CID   55611845. Project MUSE   444763.