Multidimensional Poverty Index

Last updated

Multidimensional Poverty Indices use a range of indicators to calculate a summary poverty figure for a given population, in which a larger figure indicates a higher level of poverty. This figure considers both the proportion of the population that is deemed poor, and the 'breadth' of poverty experienced by these 'poor' households, following the Alkire & Foster 'counting method'. [1] The method was developed following increased criticism of monetary and consumption based poverty measures, seeking to capture the deprivations in non-monetary factors that contribute towards well-being. While there is a standard set of indicators, dimensions, cutoffs and thresholds used for a 'Global MPI', [2] the method is flexible and there are many examples of poverty studies that modify it to best suit their environment. The methodology has been mainly, but not exclusively, [3] applied to developing countries.

Contents

The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) was developed in 2010 by the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) and the United Nations Development Programme [4] and uses health, education and standard of living indicators to determine the incidence and intensity of poverty experienced by a population. [5] [6] It has since been used to measure acute poverty across over 100 developing countries. The Global MPI is released annually by UNDP and OPHI and the results published in their websites. The MPI is published along with the Human Development Index (HDI) in the Human Development Report. [7] It replaced the Human Poverty Index.

MPI Headcount in West Africa Newton Submission.jpg
MPI Headcount in West Africa

Multidimensional Poverty Indices typically use the household as their unit of analysis, though this is not an absolute requirement. [8] A household is deprived for a given indicator if they fail to satisfy a given 'cutoff' (e.g. having at least one adult member with at least six years of education). A household is assigned a 'deprivation score' determined by the number of indicators they are deprived in and the 'weights' assigned to those indicators. Each dimension (health, education, standard of living, etc.) is typically given an equal weighting, and each indicator within the dimension is also typically weighted equally. If this household deprivation score exceeds a given threshold (e.g. 1/3) then a household is considered to be 'multiply deprived', or simply 'poor'. The final 'MPI score' (or 'Adjusted Headcount Ratio') is determined by the proportion of households deemed 'poor', multiplied by the average deprivation score of 'poor' households. [8]

MPI advocates state that the method can be used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in poverty, and permits comparisons both across countries, regions and the world and within countries by ethnic group, urban/rural location, as well as other key household and community characteristics. MPIs are useful as an analytical tool to identify the most vulnerable people – the poorest among the poor, revealing poverty patterns within countries and over time, enabling policy makers to target resources and design policies more effectively. [8] Critics of this methodology have pointed out that changes to cutoffs and thresholds, as well as the indicators included and weightings attributed to them can change MPI scores and the resulting poverty evaluation. [9] [10]

Dimensions and indicators

Dimensions

The Global MPI uses three standard dimensions: Health; Education; Standard of Living and ten indicators. [11] These mirror the Human Development Index (HDI).

Multidimensional Poverty Indices used for purposes other than global comparison have sometimes used different dimensions, including income and consumption.

Indicators and cutoffs

The Global MPI uses the following ten indicators with the following cutoffs. [12] [13]

DimensionIndicatorsDeprivation Cutoffs [14] [15]
HealthChild mortalityDeprived if a child under the age of 18 years has died in the family In the five years preceding the survey.
NutritionDeprived if any adult or child, for whom there is nutritional information, is undernourished.
EducationYears of schoolingDeprived if no household member has completed six years of schooling.
School attendanceNo household member aged 'school entrance age + six' years or older has completed six years of schooling.
Standard of livingCooking fuelDeprived if the household cooks with dung, wood or charcoal.
SanitationDeprived if the household's sanitation facility is either not improved (according to MDG guidelines), is shared with other households. or both.
Drinking waterDeprived if the household does not have access to improved drinking water (according to MDG guidelines) or improved drinking water is more than a 30-minute walk from home round trip.
ElectricityDeprived if the household has no electricity.
HousingDeprived if at least one of the three housing materials for roof, walls and floor are inadequate: the floor is of natural materials and/or the roof and/or walls are of natural or rudimentary materials.
AssetsDeprived if the household does not own more than one of these assets: radio, TV, telephone, computer, animal cart, bicycle, motorbike or refrigerator and does not own a car or truck.

The indicators selected for other MPI oriented studies vary according to availability of data and the context, [16] as well as the theoretical considerations of the researchers. [17]

Calculation

The Alkire-Foster 'counting method'

The Alkire-Foster (AF) method [18] is a way of measuring multidimensional poverty developed by OPHI's Sabina Alkire and James Foster. Building on the Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty measures, it involves counting the different types of deprivation that individuals experience at the same time, such as a lack of education or employment, or poor health or living standards. These deprivation profiles are analysed to identify who is poor, and then used to construct a multidimensional index of poverty (MPI).

Constructing poverty measures

The most common way of measuring poverty is to calculate the percentage of the population who are poor, known as the headcount ratio (H). Having identified who is poor, the AF methodology generates a unique class of poverty measures (Mα) that goes beyond the simple headcount ratio. Three measures in this class are of high importance:

  • Adjusted headcount ratio (M0), otherwise known as the MPI: This measure reflects both the incidence of poverty (the percentage of the population who are poor) and the intensity of poverty (the percentage of deprivations suffered by each person or household on average). M0 is calculated by multiplying the incidence (H) by the intensity (A). M0 = H x A.
  • Adjusted Poverty Gap (M1): This measure reflects the incidence, intensity and depth of poverty. The depth of poverty is the average 'gap' (G) between the level of deprivation poor people experience and the poverty cut-off line. M1 = H x A x G.
  • Adjusted Squared Poverty Gap (M2): This measure reflects the incidence, intensity, and depth of poverty, as well as inequality among the poor (captured by the squared gap, S). M2 = H x A x S.

M0 can be calculated with ordinal as well as cardinal data, which is why it is most often used. Cardinal data are required to calculate M1 and M2.

The AF Method is unique in that by measuring intensity it can distinguish between, for example, a group of poor people who suffer two deprivations on average and a group of poor people who suffer five deprivations on average at the same time.

Fictional example

Country X consists of persons A, B and C. The following table shows the deprivation on each of the 10 indicators for persons A, B and C.

"0%" indicates no deprivation in that indicator, while "100%" indicates deprivation in that indicator.

IndicatorWeightPerson APerson BPerson C
11/60%0%0%
21/60%0%0%
31/6100%100%0%
41/60%100%0%
51/180%100%100%
61/180%100%100%
71/180%0%100%
81/18100%100%100%
91/18100%0%100%
101/18100%0%0%
Weighted score33.33%50.00%27.78%
StatusMPI poor (≥ 33%)MPI poor (≥ 33%)Not MPI poor (< 33%)

Factor H for country X is:

Factor A for country X is:

Thus, the MPI for country X is:

Comparisons with other indicators

Comparison with HDI

The Human Development Index (HDI) was developed by Mahbub ul Haq and Amartya Sen in 1990, and was also developed by the UNDP. It is calculated as the geometric mean of the normalized indices of the three dimensions of human development; it takes into account: health, education and standard of living. UNDP has a separate version of the HDI named the IHDI (Inequality-adjusted HDI).

While both the HDI and the MPI use the three broad dimensions health, education and standard of living, the HDI uses indicators at the aggregate level while MPI uses micro data and all indicators must come from the same survey. This, among other reasons, has led to the MPI only being calculated for just over 100 countries, where data is available for all these diverse indicators, while HDI is calculated for almost all countries.

However, though HDI is thus more universally applicable, its relative sparsity of indicators also makes it more susceptible to bias. Indeed, some studies have found it to be somewhat biased towards GDP per capita (GDPpc), as demonstrated by a high correlation between HDI and the log of GDPpc. Hence, HDI has been criticized for ignoring other development parameters.

Comparison with other indicators

Both the HDI and the MPI have been criticized by economists such as Ratan Lal Basu for not taking "moral/emotional/spiritual dimensions" of poverty into consideration. It has been attempted to capture these additional factors by the "Global Happiness Index".

Impact of COVID-19

According to reports, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted education, employment and social protection of people in the countries which have higher levels of multidimensional poverty such as Zambia. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extreme poverty</span> Condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs

Extreme poverty is the most severe type of poverty, defined by the United Nations (UN) as "a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services". Historically, other definitions have been proposed within the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Development Index</span> Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income indices

The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistical composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which is used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. A country scores a higher level of HDI when the lifespan is higher, the education level is higher, and the gross national income GNI (PPP) per capita is higher. It was developed by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq and was further used to measure a country's development by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)'s Human Development Report Office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capability approach</span> Normative approach to human welfare

The capability approach is a normative approach to human welfare that concentrates on the actual capability of persons to achieve lives they value rather than solely having a right or freedom to do so. It was conceived in the 1980s as an alternative approach to welfare economics.

The Human Poverty Index (HPI) was an indication of the poverty of community in a country, developed by the United Nations to complement the Human Development Index (HDI) and was first reported as part of the Human Development Report in 1997. It is developed by United Nations Development Program which also publishes indexes like HDI It was considered to better reflect the extent of deprivation in deprived countries compared to the HDI. In 2010, it was supplanted by the UN's Multidimensional Poverty Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Development Report</span> Annual report by the Human Development Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme

The Human Development Report (HDR) is an annual Human Development Index report published by the Human Development Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in India</span>

Poverty in India remains a major challenge despite overall reductions in the last several decades as its economy grows. According to an International Monetary Fund paper, extreme poverty, defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, in India was as low as 0.8% in 2019, and the country managed to keep it at that level in 2020 despite the unprecedented COVID-19 outbreak. According to the World Bank, India experienced a significant decline in the prevalence of extreme poverty from 22.5% in 2011 to 10.2% in 2019. A working paper of the bank said rural poverty declined from 26.3% in 2011 to 11.6% in 2019. The decline in urban areas was from 14.2% to 6.3% in the same period. The poverty level in rural and urban areas went down by 14.7 and 7.9 percentage points, respectively. According to United Nations Development Programme administrator Achim Steiner, India lifted 271 million people out of extreme poverty in a 10-year time period from 2005–2006 to 2015–2016. A 2020 study from the World Economic Forum found "Some 220 million Indians sustained on an expenditure level of less than Rs 32 / day—the poverty line for rural India—by the last headcount of the poor in India in 2013."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy poverty</span> Lack of access to energy services such as electricity and heating

In developing countries and some areas of more developed countries, energy poverty is lack of access to modern energy services in the home. In 2022, 759 million people lacked access to consistent electricity and 2.6 billion people used dangerous and inefficient cooking systems. Their well-being is negatively affected by very low consumption of energy, use of dirty or polluting fuels, and excessive time spent collecting fuel to meet basic needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Measuring poverty</span> Overview about the measure of poverty

Poverty is measured in different ways by different bodies, both governmental and nongovernmental. Measurements can be absolute, which references a single standard, or relative, which is dependent on context. Poverty is widely understood to be multidimensional, comprising social, natural and economic factors situated within wider socio-political processes.

The Gender Development Index (GDI) is an index designed to measure gender equality.

The Institute for International Economic Policy is a research institution dedicated to the study of global economic governance, based in Washington, DC at the Elliott School of International Affairs of the George Washington University. Notable IIEP members include Sabina Alkire, James Foster, and Jeni Klugman. Partnerships with organizations like the World Bank Group, International Monetary Fund, Internet Society, and The Nature Conservancy have led to academic conferences and policy seminars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative</span> UK economic research centre

The Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) is an economic research centre within the Oxford Department of International Development at the University of Oxford, England, that was established in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender Inequality Index</span> United Nations index for gender inequality

The Gender Inequality Index (GII) is an index for the measurement of gender disparity that was introduced in the 2010 Human Development Report 20th anniversary edition by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). According to the UNDP, this index is a composite measure to quantify the loss of achievement within a country due to gender inequality. It uses three dimensions to measure opportunity cost: reproductive health, empowerment, and labor market participation. The new index was introduced as an experimental measure to remedy the shortcomings of the previous indicators, the Gender Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), both of which were introduced in the 1995 Human Development Report.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabina Alkire</span> Philosopher (born 1969)

Sabina Alkire is an American academic and Anglican priest, who is the director of the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), an economic research centre within the Oxford Department of International Development at the University of Oxford, England, which was established in 2007. She is a fellow of the Human Development and Capability Association. She has worked with organizations such as the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, the United Nations Human Development Programme Human Development Report Office, the European Commission, and the UK's Department for International Development.

Measures of gender equality or inequality are statistical tools employed to quantify the concept of gender equality.

The Fordham Francis Index is a multidimensional measure of international poverty. It is a simple tool that relies on seven primary indicators which are categorized into a Material Well-being Index and a Spiritual Well-being Index. It was launched on September 23, 2016 at a Fordham conference entitled Pope Francis' Call for Escaping Poverty co-sponsored by the Vatican Foundation Centesimus Annus Pro Pontifice. The research was conducted by students from Fordham's Graduate Program in International Political Economy and Development(IPED), under the research direction of Dr. Henry Schwalbenberg. The Fordham Francis Index is a response to the Pope's Address to the United Nations in New York last September 25, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Foster (economist)</span> American economist

James Eric Foster is Professor of Economics and International Affairs at the George Washington University, in the Elliott School of International Affairs, researching welfare economics and poverty measurement. He is known for developing the Alkire Foster Method, with University of Oxford professor and OPHI Director Sabina Alkire. He is a board member for the World Bank.

Kenya is a upper-middle income economy as of 2024, with kenya's GDP 2024 hitting [[204.6B $]]. This is Due to increasing technology innovation Services. Although Kenya's economy is the largest and most developed in eastern and Central Africa, 16.1% (2023/2024) of its population lives below the international poverty line. This severe poverty is mainly caused by economic inequality, government corruption and health problems. In turn, poverty also worsens these factors. The Kenyan government's efforts to address poverty have received help from international institutions as well. The incident rate of poverty has steadily decreased, as shown by a recent MPI index.

References

  1. ↑ Alkire & Foster (2011). "Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement". Journal of Public Economics. 95 (7–8): 476–487. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006. S2CID   6113312.
  2. ↑ Alkire, Roche & Seth (2013). The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index. Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.
  3. ↑ Suppa, Nicolai (2018). "Towards a multidimensional poverty index for Germany" (PDF). Empirica. 45, 4 (4): 655–683. doi:10.1007/s10663-017-9385-3. hdl: 10419/106992 . S2CID   159012835.
  4. ↑ "A wealth of data. A useful new way to capture the many aspects of poverty". The Economist . July 29, 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-04. Aided by the improved availability of survey data about living conditions for households in over 100 developing countries, the researchers have come up with a new index, called the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), which the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will use in its next "Human Development Report" in October.
  5. ↑ "Poverty index reveals stark inequalities among ethnic groups | United Nations Development Programme". UNDP. Retrieved 8 August 2022.
  6. ↑ Tandon, Tulika (21 October 2021). "Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2021: What is Multidimensional Poverty and India's Rank?". Jagranjosh.com .
  7. ↑ Maiti, K.D.; Mehrotra, Santosh. "The Curious Case of India's Millions of 'Missing' Poor People". The Wire. Retrieved 8 August 2022.
  8. 1 2 3 "Multidimensional Poverty - Measurement & Analysis". multidimensionalpoverty.org. Retrieved 2019-08-16.
  9. ↑ Cavapozzi, Han & Miniaci (2015). "Alternative weighting structures for multidimensional poverty assessment". Journal of Economic Inequality. 13, 3 (3): 425–447. doi:10.1007/s10888-015-9301-7. hdl: 11379/459215 . S2CID   158176100.
  10. ↑ Ravallion, Martin (2011-06-01). "On multidimensional indices of poverty" (PDF). The Journal of Economic Inequality. 9 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1007/s10888-011-9173-4. hdl: 10986/3346 . ISSN   1573-8701. S2CID   14917462.
  11. ↑ "5.29% population in Pune is poor: Multidimensional Poverty Index". Hindustan Times. 12 July 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  12. ↑ "The 2020 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index". January 2020.
  13. ↑ Alkire Roche Santos Seth. "Multidimensional Poverty Index 2011: Brief Methodological Note" (PDF). Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI).
  14. ↑ "Global Multidimensional Poverty Index". ophi.org.uk. Retrieved 2019-12-25.
  15. ↑ "The 2020 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) | Human Development Reports". hdr.undp.org. January 2020. Retrieved 2020-07-20.
  16. ↑ Berenger, V. (2016). "Measuring Multidimensional Poverty in Three South East Asian Countries using Ordinal Variables". ADBI Working Paper Series. 618.
  17. ↑ Bag & Seth (2018). "Does it Matter How We Assess Standard of Living? Evidence from Indian Slums Comparing Monetary and Multidimensional Approaches". Social Indicators Research. 134, 2.
  18. ↑ "OPHI's method for multidimensional measurement". ophi.org.uk. Retrieved 2019-12-25.
  19. ↑ "Poverty index reveals stark inequalities among ethnic groups". UNDP . October 7, 2021.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.