Poverty gap index

Last updated

The poverty gap index is a measure of the degree of poverty. It is defined as extent to which individuals on average fall below the poverty line, and expresses it as a percentage of the poverty line. [1]

Contents

The poverty gap index is an improvement over the poverty measure head count ratio, which simply counts all the people below a poverty line in a given population and considers them equally poor. [2] Poverty gap index estimates the depth of poverty by considering how far the poor are from that poverty line on average. [3]

Definition

The poverty gap index sometimes referred to as poverty gap ratio or pg index is defined as average of the ratio of the poverty gap to the poverty line. [4] It is expressed as a percentage of the poverty line for a country or region. [5]

Significance

The most common method measuring and reporting poverty is the head count ratio, given as the percentage of population that is below the poverty line. For example, The New York Times in July 2012 reported the poverty head count ratio as 11.1% of American population in 1973, 15.2% in 1983 and 11.3% in 2000. [6] One of the undesirable features of the head count ratio is that it ignores the depth of poverty; if the poor become poorer, the head count index does not change. [7]

Poverty gap index provides a clearer perspective on the depth of poverty. It enables poverty comparisons. It also helps provide an overall assessment of a region's progress in poverty reduction and the evaluation of specific public policies or private initiatives. [8]

Calculation

The poverty gap index (PGI) is calculated as, [5]

or

where is the total population, is the total population of poor who are living at or below the poverty line, is the poverty line, and is the income of the poor individual . In this calculation, individuals whose income is above the poverty line have a gap of zero.

By definition, the poverty gap index is a percentage between 0 and 100%. Sometimes it is reported as a fraction, between 0 and 1. A theoretical value of zero implies that no one in the population is below the poverty line. A theoretical value of 100% implies that everyone in the population has zero income. In some literature, poverty gap index is reported as while the head count ratio is reported as . [9]

Features

The poverty gap index can be interpreted as the average percentage shortfall in income for the population, from the poverty line. [5]

If you multiply a country's poverty gap index by both the poverty line and the total number of individuals in the country you get the total amount of money needed to bring the poor in the population out of extreme poverty and up to the poverty line, assuming perfect targeting of transfers. For example, suppose a country has 10 million individuals, a poverty line of $500 per year and a poverty gap index of 5%. Then an average increase of $25 per individual per year would eliminate extreme poverty. Note that $25 is 5% of the poverty line. The total increase needed to eliminate poverty is US$250 million—$25 multiplied by 10 million individuals.

The poverty gap index is an important measure beyond the commonly used head count ratio. Two regions may have the similar head count ratio, but distinctly different poverty gap indices. A higher poverty gap index means that poverty is more severe.

The poverty gap index is additive. In other words, the index can be used as an aggregate poverty measure, as well as decomposed for various sub-groups of the population, such as by region, employment sector, education level, gender, age or ethnic group.

Limitations

Poverty gap index ignores the effect of inequality between the poor. It does not capture differences in the severity of poverty amongst the poor. As a theoretical example, consider two small neighborhoods where just two households each are below the official poverty line of US$500 income per year. In one case, household 1 has an income of US$100 per year and household 2 has an income of US$300 per year. In second case, the two households both have annual income of US$200 per year. The poverty gap index for both cases is same (60%), even though the first case has one household, with US$100 per year income, experiencing a more severe state of poverty. Scholars, therefore, consider poverty gap index as a moderate but incomplete improvement over poverty head count ratio. [10]

Scholars such as Amartya Sen suggest poverty gap index offers quantitative improvement over simply counting the poor below the poverty line, but remains limited at the qualitative level. Focusing on precisely measuring income gap diverts the attention from qualitative aspects such as capabilities, skills and personal resources that may sustainably eradicate poverty. A better measure would focus on capabilities and consequent consumption side of impoverished households. [11] These suggestions were initially controversial, and have over time inspired scholars to propose numerous refinements. [2] [12] [13] [14]

The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke metric is the general form of the PGI. The formula raises the summands to the power alpha, so that FGT0 is the head count index, FGT1 the PGI and FGT2 the squared PGI.

Squared poverty gap index, also known poverty severity index or , is related to poverty gap index. It is calculated by averaging the square of the poverty gap ratio. By squaring each poverty gap data, the measure puts more weight the further a poor person's observed income falls below the poverty line. The squared poverty gap index is one form of a weighted sum of poverty gaps, with the weight proportionate to the poverty gap. [9]

Sen index, sometimes referred to , is related to poverty gap index (PGI). [2] [15] It is calculated as follows:

where, is the head count ratio and is the income Gini coefficient of only the people below the poverty line.

Watts index, sometimes referred to , is related to poverty gap index (PGI). [15] It is calculated as follows:

The terms used to calculate are same as in poverty gap index (see the calculation section in this article).

Poverty gap index by country

The following table summarizes the poverty gap index for developed and developing countries across the world.

Poverty gap ratio for various countries
CountryPoverty
line
($/month) [lower-alpha 1]
Head count
ratio
(%)
Poverty
gap
index
(%)
Year
Flag of Albania.svg  Albania 380.620.192008
Flag of Angola.svg  Angola 3854.3129.942000
Flag of Argentina.svg  Argentina [lower-alpha 2] 380.920.652010
Flag of Armenia.svg  Armenia 381.280.252008
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 95912.42.932010
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria 10246.61.812010
Flag of Azerbaijan.svg  Azerbaijan 380.430.142008
Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh 3843.2511.172010
Flag of Belarus.svg  Belarus 380.10.12008
Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium 9308.81.802010
Flag of Belize.svg  Belize 3812.215.521999
Flag of Benin.svg  Benin 3847.3315.732003
Flag of Bhutan.svg  Bhutan 3810.221.812007
Bandera de Bolivia (Estado).svg  Bolivia 3815.618.642008
Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg  Bosnia and Herzegovina 380.040.022007
Flag of Botswana.svg  Botswana 3831.2311.041993
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 3503.913.622015
Flag of Burkina Faso.svg  Burkina Faso 3844.614.662009
Flag of Burundi.svg  Burundi 3881.3236.392006
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 3822.754.872008
Flag of Cameroon.svg  Cameroon 389.561.22007
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 105612.12.962010
Flag of Cape Verde.svg  Cape Verde 3821.026.052001
Flag of the Central African Republic.svg  Central African Republic 3862.8331.262008
Flag of Chad.svg  Chad 3861.9425.642002
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile 381.350.692009
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China [lower-alpha 3] 3816.254.032005
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia 388.163.782010
Flag of the Comoros.svg  Comoros 3846.1120.822004
Flag of Costa Rica.svg  Costa Rica 383.121.792009
Flag of Cote d'Ivoire.svg  Cote d'Ivoire 3823.757.52008
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic 5155.81.372010
Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark 9555.31.292010
Flag of Djibouti.svg  Djibouti 3818.845.292002
Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg  Dominican Republic 382.240.522010
Flag of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.svg  Congo, Dem. Rep. 3887.7252.82005
Flag of the Republic of the Congo.svg  Congo, Rep. 3854.122.82005
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador 384.62.12010
Flag of Egypt.svg  Egypt 381.690.42008
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia 388.94.42009
Flag of Ethiopia.svg  Ethiopia 38399.62005
Flag of Fiji.svg  Fiji 385.91.12009
Flag of Finland.svg  Finland 8757.31.482010
Flag of France.svg  France 8617.11.442010
Flag of Gabon.svg  Gabon 384.8.92005
Flag of The Gambia.svg  Gambia 3833.611.72003
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany 918113.672010
Flag of Georgia.svg  Georgia 3815.34.62008
Flag of Ghana.svg  Ghana 3828.69.92006
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece 72012.63.362010
Flag of Guatemala.svg  Guatemala 3813.54.72006
Flag of Guinea.svg  Guinea 3843.315.2007
Flag of Guinea-Bissau.svg  Guinea-Bissau 3848.916.62002
Flag of Guyana.svg  Guyana 388.72.81998
Flag of Haiti.svg  Haiti 3861.732.32001
Flag of Honduras.svg  Honduras 3817.99.42009
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 4077.11.662010
Flag of Iceland.svg  Iceland 9427.12.552010
Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland 93414.83.082010
Flag of India.svg  India 3832.77.52010
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 3818.13.32010
Flag of Iran.svg  Iran 381.450.342005
Flag of Iraq.svg  Iraq 382.80.422007
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy 70011.43.082010
Flag of Jamaica.svg  Jamaica 380.210.022004
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan 95014.95.172010
Flag of Jordan.svg  Jordan 380.120.032010
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan 380.110.032009
Flag of Kenya.svg  Kenya 3843.416.92005
Flag of Kyrgyzstan (2023).svg  Kyrgyzstan 386.41.52008
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos 384412.12002
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 380.140.12008
Flag of Lesotho.svg  Lesotho 3843.420.82003
Flag of Liberia.svg  Liberia 3883.840.92007
Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania 380.160.12008
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg 15118.11.622010
Flag of North Macedonia.svg  Macedonia 380.290.042008
Flag of Madagascar.svg  Madagascar 3881.343.32010
Flag of Malawi.svg  Malawi 3873.932.32004
Flag of Maldives.svg  Maldives 381.480.142008
Flag of Mali.svg  Mali 3850.416.42010
Flag of Mauritania.svg  Mauritania 3823.46.82008
Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico 19218.46.972010
Flag of the Federated States of Micronesia.svg  Micronesia 3831.216.32000
Flag of Moldova.svg  Moldova 380.390.082010
Flag of Montenegro.svg  Montenegro 380.120.082008
Flag of Morocco.svg  Morocco 382.5.542007
Flag of Mozambique.svg  Mozambique 3859.625.12008
Flag of Namibia.svg  Namibia 3831.99.52004
Flag of Nepal.svg    Nepal 3824.85.62010
Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands 11687.71.612010
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 80310.83.632010
Flag of Nicaragua.svg  Nicaragua 3811.92.42005
Flag of Niger.svg  Niger 3843.612.42008
Flag of Nigeria.svg  Nigeria 386833.72010
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway 11096.82.002010
Flag of Pakistan.svg  Pakistan 38213.52008
Flag of Panama.svg  Panama 386.62.12010
Flag of Papua 2.svg  Papua 3835.812.31996
Flag of Paraguay.svg  Paraguay 387.23.2010
Flag of Peru.svg  Peru 384.91.32010
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 3818.43.72009
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland 33814.65.202010
Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal 51212.93.742010
Flag of Romania.svg  Romania 380.410.192009
Flag of Russia.svg  Russia [16] 6114.35.092006
Flag of Rwanda.svg  Rwanda 3863.226.62011
Flag of Sao Tome and Principe.svg  São Tomé and Príncipe 3828.27.92001
Flag of Senegal.svg  Senegal 3833.510.82005
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia 380.260.172009
Flag of Sierra Leone.svg  Sierra Leone 3853.420.32003
Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia 3688.12.072010
Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa 3813.82.32009
Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea 80914.65.262010
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain 74914.14.512010
Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka 38712007
Flag of Sudan.svg  Sudan 3819.85.52009
Flag of Suriname.svg  Suriname 3815.55.91999
Flag of Eswatini.svg  Swaziland 3840.616.2010
Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden 8635.31.312010
Flag of Syria.svg  Syria 381.710.22004
Flag of Switzerland (Pantone).svg   Switzerland 11488.73.372010
Flag of Tajikistan.svg  Tajikistan 386.61.22009
Flag of Tanzania.svg  Tanzania 3867.928.12007
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 380.370.052009
Flag of East Timor.svg  East Timor 3837.48.92007
Flag of Togo.svg  Togo 3838.711.42006
Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg  Trinidad and Tobago 384.21.12008
Flag of Tunisia.svg  Tunisia 381.350.282005
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 21117.55.762010
Flag of Turkmenistan.svg  Turkmenistan 3824.871998
Flag of Uganda.svg  Uganda 3838.0112.22009
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine 380.060.042009
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom 10278.32.062010
Flag of the United States.svg  United States [lower-alpha 4] 123217.16.552010
Flag of Uruguay.svg  Uruguay 380.20.072008
Flag of Venezuela.svg  Venezuela 386.63.72006
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 3816.93.82008
Flag of Yemen.svg  Yemen 3817.54.22005
Flag of Zambia.svg  Zambia 3868.5372006

See also

Notes

  1. This is on purchasing power parity basis, international dollar adjusted for inflation to 2005; To convert to $ per day income, divide by 30.4; for annual income multiply by 12.
  2. This data is for urban population only.
  3. This data is for rural population of China.
  4. The U.S. defines its poverty line on a dynamic basis and household size. As an example, for a family of 4 in a household, the poverty line was about $1,838 per month.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gini coefficient</span> Measure of inequality of a distribution

In economics, the Gini coefficient, also known as the Gini index or Gini ratio, is a measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent the income inequality, the wealth inequality, or the consumption inequality within a nation or a social group. It was developed by Italian statistician and sociologist Corrado Gini.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geometric mean</span> N-th root of the product of n numbers

In mathematics, the geometric mean is a mean or average which indicates a central tendency of a finite set of real numbers by using the product of their values. The geometric mean is defined as the nth root of the product of n numbers, i.e., for a set of numbers a1, a2, ..., an, the geometric mean is defined as

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lorenz curve</span> Graphical representation of the distribution of income or of wealth

In economics, the Lorenz curve is a graphical representation of the distribution of income or of wealth. It was developed by Max O. Lorenz in 1905 for representing inequality of the wealth distribution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Standard of living in the United States</span> Summary of living conditions in the United States of America

The standard of living in the United States is high by the standards that most economists use, and for many decades throughout the 20th century, the United States was recognized as having the highest standard of living in the world. Per capita income is high but also less evenly distributed than in most other developed countries; as a result, the United States fares particularly well in measures of average material well being that do not place weight on equality aspects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty threshold</span> Minimum income deemed adequate to live in a specific country or place

The poverty threshold, poverty limit, poverty line, or breadline is the minimum level of income deemed adequate in a particular country. The poverty line is usually calculated by estimating the total cost of one year's worth of necessities for the average adult. The cost of housing, such as the rent for an apartment, usually makes up the largest proportion of this estimate, so economists track the real estate market and other housing cost indicators as a major influence on the poverty line. Individual factors are often used to account for various circumstances, such as whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. The poverty threshold may be adjusted annually. In practice, like the definition of poverty, the official or common understanding of the poverty line is significantly higher in developed countries than in developing countries.

In welfare economics and social choice theory, a social welfare function—also called a socialordering, ranking, utility, or choicefunction—is a function that ranks a set of social states by their desirability. A social welfare function takes two possible outcomes, then combines every person's preferences to determine which outcome is considered better by society as a whole. Inputs to the function can include any variables that affect the well-being of a society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Development Index</span> Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income indices

The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistical composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which is used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. A country scores a higher level of HDI when the lifespan is higher, the education level is higher, and the gross national income GNI (PPP) per capita is higher. It was developed by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq and was further used to measure a country's development by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)'s Human Development Report Office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income distribution</span> How a countrys total GDP is distributed amongst its population

In economics, income distribution covers how a country's total GDP is distributed amongst its population. Economic theory and economic policy have long seen income and its distribution as a central concern. Unequal distribution of income causes economic inequality which is a concern in almost all countries around the world.

Income inequality metrics or income distribution metrics are used by social scientists to measure the distribution of income and economic inequality among the participants in a particular economy, such as that of a specific country or of the world in general. While different theories may try to explain how income inequality comes about, income inequality metrics simply provide a system of measurement used to determine the dispersion of incomes. The concept of inequality is distinct from poverty and fairness.

In finance, the duration of a financial asset that consists of fixed cash flows, such as a bond, is the weighted average of the times until those fixed cash flows are received. When the price of an asset is considered as a function of yield, duration also measures the price sensitivity to yield, the rate of change of price with respect to yield, or the percentage change in price for a parallel shift in yields.

The Theil index is a statistic primarily used to measure economic inequality and other economic phenomena, though it has also been used to measure racial segregation.

The Hoover index, also known as the Robin Hood index or the Schutz index, is a measure of income inequality. It is equal to the percentage of the total population's income that would have to be redistributed to make all the incomes equal.

The Atkinson index is a measure of income inequality developed by British economist Anthony Barnes Atkinson. The measure is useful in determining which end of the distribution contributed most to the observed inequality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Measuring poverty</span> Overview about the measure of poverty

Poverty is measured in different ways by different bodies, both governmental and nongovernmental. Measurements can be absolute, which references a single standard, or relative, which is dependent on context. Poverty is widely understood to be multidimensional, comprising social, natural and economic factors situated within wider socio-political processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in China</span> Economic issues in China

In China today, poverty refers mainly to the rural poor. Decades of economic development has reduced urban extreme poverty. According to the World Bank, more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty; China's poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015, as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms, which still stands in 2022.

The Foster–Greer–Thorbeckeindices are a family ofpoverty metrics. The most commonly used index from the family, FGT2, puts higher weight on the poverty of the poorest individuals, making it a combined measure of poverty and income inequality and a popular choice within development economics. The indices were introduced in a 1984 paper by economists Erik Thorbecke, Joel Greer, and James Foster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multidimensional Poverty Index</span> Range of poverty indicators

Multidimensional Poverty Indices use a range of indicators to calculate a summary poverty figure for a given population, in which a larger figure indicates a higher level of poverty. This figure considers both the proportion of the population that is deemed poor, and the 'breadth' of poverty experienced by these 'poor' households, following the Alkire & Foster 'counting method'. The method was developed following increased criticism of monetary and consumption based poverty measures, seeking to capture the deprivations in non-monetary factors that contribute towards well-being. While there is a standard set of indicators, dimensions, cutoffs and thresholds used for a 'Global MPI', the method is flexible and there are many examples of poverty studies that modify it to best suit their environment. The methodology has been mainly, but not exclusively, applied to developing countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative</span> UK economic research centre

The Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) is an economic research centre within the Oxford Department of International Development at the University of Oxford, England, that was established in 2007.

The OECD Better Life Index, created in May 2011 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, is an initiative pioneering the development of economic indicators which better capture multiple dimensions of economic and social progress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poverty in Poland</span>

Poverty in Poland has been relatively stable in the past decades, affecting about 6.5% of the society. In the last decade there has been a lowering trend, as in general Polish society is becoming wealthier and the economy is enjoying one of the highest growth rates in Europe. There have been noticeable increases in poverty around the turns of the decades, offset by decreases in poverty in the years following those periods.

References

  1. "Poverty Gap". stats.areppim.com. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 Sen, Amartya (March 1976). "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement". Econometrica . 44 (2): 219–231. doi:10.2307/1912718. JSTOR   1912718.
  3. Grusky, David B.; Kanbur, Ravi, eds. (2006). Poverty and Inequality. Studies in Social Inequality. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. [ page needed ]. ISBN   978-0-8047-4843-8.
  4. Indicators for Monitoring the Millennium Development Goals (PDF). New York: United Nations. 2003. p. 9.
  5. 1 2 3 "Poverty Measures" (PDF). World Bank. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 10, 2012.
  6. Edelman, Peter (July 28, 2012). "Poverty in America: Why Can't We End It?". The New York Times . Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  7. Ravallion, Martin (June 1996). Issues in Measuring and Modeling Poverty (PDF). Policy Research Working Paper. Vol. 1615. Washington, D.C.: World Bank . Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  8. "Indicators of Sustainable Development". United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development. 2004. Archived from the original on April 21, 2012. Retrieved August 10, 2012.
  9. 1 2 "Poverty Measures, Chapter 4" (PDF). Introduction to Poverty Analysis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Institute. August 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 10, 2012.
  10. Foster, James E. (May 1998). "Absolute versus Relative Poverty". The American Economic Review . 88 (2): 335–341. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.383.6488 . JSTOR   116944.
  11. Morrell, Dan (January–February 2011). "Who Is Poor?". Harvard Magazine . Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  12. Sen, Amartya (December 1985). "A Sociological Approach to the Measurement of Poverty: A Reply to Professor Peter Townsend". Oxford Economic Papers . 37 (4): 669–676. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041716. JSTOR   2663049.
  13. Takayama, Noriyuki (May 1979). "Poverty, Income Inequality, and Their Measures: Professor Sen's Axiomatic Approach Reconsidered". Econometrica. 47 (3): 747–759. doi:10.2307/1910420. JSTOR   1910420.
  14. Jenkins, Stephen P.; Lambert, Peter J. (July 1997). "Three 'I's of Poverty Curves, with an Analysis of UK Poverty Trends". Oxford Economic Papers. 49 (3): 317–327. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a028611. JSTOR   2663596.
  15. 1 2 Vecchi, Giovanni (September 2007). "Poverty Measurement" (PDF). World Bank. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2016.
  16. Mosley, Paul; Mussurov, Altay (April 2009). "Poverty and Economic Growth in Russia's Regions" (PDF). Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series. University of Sheffield. ISSN   1749-8368.