UNESCO defined the Gender Parity Index (GPI) as a socioeconomic index usually designed to measure the relative access to education of males and females. It is used by international organizations particularly in measuring the progress of developing countries. For example, some UNESCO documents consider gender parity in literacy. [1]
UNESCO describes attempts to eliminate gender disparities in primary and secondary education and emphasize on the plight of girls in unequal access in third world countries. [2]
GPI is often used in order to identify nations and regions that are in need of economic development and equality. [3]
The World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report 2022 allows users to look at and compare country GPI data, calculate their own country's gender parity and explore global patterns. [3]
World GPI has consistently increased toward parity since 1980. [4]
The Institute for Statistics of UNESCO also uses a more general definition of GPI: for any development indicator one can define the GPI relative to this indicator by dividing its value for females by its value for males. [2]
In its simplest form, GPI is calculated as the quotient of the number of females by the number of males enrolled in a given stage of education (primary, secondary, etc.).
A GPI value that is less than one is an indication that gender parity favor males while a GPI value greater than one designates that gender parity is in favor of females. [5] The closer a GPI is to one, the closer a country is to achieving equality of access between males and females. [6] A nation is said to have achieved gender parity when its GPI value falls within the range of 0.97 and 1.03. [7]
The utilization of Gender Parity Index (GPI) by economists enables comprehensive monitoring and assessment of a nation's economic progress from a gender equality perspective. [3] It is believed by many economists that gender inequality results in economic consequences such as increased unemployment, decreased output, and vast income inequality. [8] As such, the monitoring of GPI by international organizations, such as UNESCO and the World Bank, serves the purpose of discerning the economic development deficiencies in nations and regions that are caused by gender inequality.
There is a present link between low-income countries a low GPI, particularly in secondary education and tertiary education. [9] For example, many low-income, sub-Saharan countries have large gaps between male and female access to education. [9]
Household income level is also a determining factor in secondary and tertiary GPI. [9] In underdeveloped countries such as Cameroon, Guinea, Pakistan, and Yemen, gender parity existed among the top 20% of earners; yet low GPI levels were present among the bottom 20% of earners. [9] As such, policymakers and other stakeholders utilize GPI in order to target regions in which economic development is a primary cause of gender disparity.
In the education space, GPI is used to measure gender equality in education access. [2] Governments and international organizations such as UNESCO and the United Nations monitor the gender gap in education access, using GPI to identify sectors where intervention is needed to address gender disparities. [2]
A low GPI at the primary education level is an indication of economic, cultural, or other structural barriers that prevent women from receiving education, and a low GPI at the tertiary education level is an indication of structural barriers preventing women from breaking into specialized, advanced career fields. [9]
GPI is also used to measure literacy equality, particularly by UNESCO. [2] Gender disparities, specifically in primary education, have a drastic effect on literacy rates. For example, a low primary GPI is an indication that women in a particular nation or region are restricted from acquiring basic literacy skills. [10]
Year | World GPI |
1970 | 0.8 |
1971 | 0.8 |
1972 | 0.8 |
1973 | 0.8 |
1974 | 0.8 |
1975 | 0.82 |
1976 | 0.84 |
1978 | 0.85 |
1979 | 0.84 |
1980 | 0.85 |
1981 | 0.85 |
1982 | 0.85 |
1983 | 0.84 |
1984 | 0.85 |
1985 | 0.85 |
1986 | 0.87 |
1987 | 0.87 |
1988 | 0.87 |
1989 | 0.88 |
1990 | 0.88 |
1991 | 0.89 |
1992 | 0.9 |
1993 | 0.9 |
1994 | 0.91 |
1995 | 0.91 |
1996 | 0.91 |
1997 | 0.92 |
1998 | 0.92 |
1999 | 0.92 |
2000 | 0.92 |
2001 | 0.93 |
2002 | 0.93 |
2003 | 0.95 |
2004 | 0.95 |
2005 | 0.95 |
2006 | 0.96 |
2007 | 0.96 |
2008 | 0.97 |
2009 | 0.97 |
2010 | 0.97 |
2011 | 0.98 |
2012 | 0.98 |
2013 | 1 |
2014 | 1 |
2015 | 1 |
2016 | 1.01 |
2017 | 1 |
2018 | 0.98 |
2019 | 0.98 |
2020 | 0.98 |
Country | Most recent year of calculation | Most recent value |
Afghanistan | 2019 | 0.67 |
Albania | 2021 | 1.02 |
Algeria | 2020 | 0.97 |
Andorra | 1983 | 0.96 |
Angola | 2018 | 0.94 |
Antigua and Barbuda | 2019 | 0.98 |
Argentina | 2020 | 1.01 |
Armenia | 2021 | 1.01 |
Austria | 2020 | 0.99 |
Azerbaijan | 2021 | 1.01 |
Bahrain | 2019 | 0.99 |
Bangladesh | 2021 | 1.02 |
Barbados | 2021 | 0.97 |
Belarus | 2021 | 1 |
Belgium | 2020 | 1.01 |
Belize | 2021 | 0.96 |
Benin | 2021 | 0.93 |
Bhutan | 2021 | 1.04 |
Bolivia | 2020 | 1 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | N/A | No Data |
Botswana | 2021 | 0.98 |
Brazil | 2020 | 0.95 |
Brunei | 2020 | 1 |
Bulgaria | 2020 | 0.99 |
Burkina Faso | 2021 | 1.02 |
Burundi | 2020 | 1.01 |
Cabo Verde | 2019 | 0.94 |
Cambodia | 2021 | 0.98 |
Cameroon | 2019 | 0.9 |
Canada | 2020 | 0.97 |
Central African Republic | 2017 | 0.77 |
Chad | 2021 | 0.8 |
Channel Islands | N/A | No Data |
Chile | 2020 | 0.97 |
China | 2021 | 1.01 |
Colombia | 2020 | 0.97 |
Comoros | 2018 | 1 |
Congo | 2018 | 0.97 |
Costa Rica | 2021 | 0.99 |
Côte d'Ivoire | 2021 | 0.95 |
Croatia | 2020 | 1 |
Cuba | 2021 | 0.98 |
Cyprus | 2020 | 0.99 |
Czech Republic | 2020 | 1 |
Denmark | 2020 | 1 |
Djibouti | 2021 | 0.92 |
Dominica | 2021 | 0.95 |
Dominican Republic | 2021 | 0.97 |
DR Congo | 2020 | 0.95 |
Ecuador | 2021 | 1.02 |
Egypt | 2019 | 1.01 |
El Salvador | 2014 | 0.96 |
Equatorial Guinea | 2015 | 0.99 |
Eritrea | 2019 | 0.86 |
Estonia | 2020 | 1 |
Eswatini | 2019 | 0.92 |
Ethiopia | 2021 | 0.91 |
Fiji | 2021 | 0.96 |
Finland | 2020 | 1 |
France | 2020 | 0.99 |
French Guiana | No Data | No Data |
Gabon | 2019 | 0.97 |
Gambia | 2021 | 1.13 |
Georgia | 2021 | 1.01 |
Germany | 2020 | 1.01 |
Ghana | 2020 | 1.02 |
Gibraltar | 2021 | 1.07 |
Greece | 2020 | 1.01 |
Grenada | 2018 | 0.98 |
Guatemala | 2021 | 0.98 |
Guinea | 2020 | 0.85 |
Guinea-Bissau | 2010 | 0.93 |
Guyana | 2012 | 0.96 |
Haiti | 1998 | 0.97 |
Holy See | No Data | No Data |
Honduras | 2012 | 1 |
Hong Kong | 2021 | 1.04 |
Hungary | 2020 | 0.98 |
Iceland | 2020 | 1.01 |
India | 2021 | 1.02 |
Indonesia | 2018 | 0.97 |
Iran | 2020 | 1.06 |
Iraq | 2007 | 0.84 |
Ireland | 2020 | 1 |
Isle of Man | No Data | No Data |
Israel | 2020 | |
Italy | 2020 | 1 |
Jamaica | 2007 | 1 |
Japan | 2019 | 1 |
Jordan | 2021 | 0.99 |
Kazakhstan | 2020 | 1 |
Kenya | 2019 | 0.97 |
Kuwait | 2021 | 1.15 |
Kyrgyzstan | 2021 | 1 |
Laos | 2021 | 0.97 |
Latvia | 2020 | 1 |
Lebanon | 1985 | 0.91 |
Lesotho | 2019 | 0.95 |
Liberia | 2020 | 1 |
Libya | 2006 | 0.96 |
Liechtenstein | 2020 | 0.97 |
Lithuania | 2020 | 1 |
Luxembourg | 2020 | 0.99 |
Macao | 2021 | 0.98 |
Madagascar | 2019 | 1.02 |
Malawi | 2019 | 1.03 |
Malaysia | 2020 | 1.01 |
Maldives | 2020 | 1 |
Mali | 2020 | 0.91 |
Malta | 2020 | 1 |
Mauritania | 2020 | 1.07 |
Mauritius | 2021 | 1.02 |
Mayotte | No data | No data |
Mexico | 2020 | 1.01 |
Moldova | 2021 | 0.99 |
Monaco | No Data | No Data |
Mongolia | 2021 | 0.98 |
Montenegro | 2021 | 1 |
Morocco | 2021 | 0.97 |
Mozambique | 2020 | 0.94 |
Myanmar | 2018 | 0.96 |
Namibia | 2021 | 0.97 |
Nepal | 2021 | 0.96 |
Netherlands | 2020 | 1 |
Nicaragua | 2020 | 0.99 |
Niger | 2021 | 0.91 |
Nigeria | 2019 | 1.01 |
North Korea | No Data | No Data |
North Macedonia | 2020 | 1 |
Norway | 2020 | 1 |
Oman | 2021 | 1 |
Pakistan | 2019 | 0.88 |
Panama | 2021 | 0.99 |
Paraguay | 2015 | 0.97 |
Peru | 2021 | 0.97 |
Philippines | 2021 | 0.98 |
Poland | 2020 | 0.96 |
Portugal | 2020 | 0.99 |
Qatar | 2021 | 1.02 |
Réunion | No Data | No Data |
Romania | 2020 | 0.99 |
Russia | 2019 | 0.99 |
Rwanda | 2021 | 0.99 |
Saint Helena | No Data | No Data |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | No Data | No Data |
Saint Lucia | No Data | No Data |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | No Data | No Data |
San Marino | 2021 | 0.99 |
São Tomé and Príncipe | 2017 | 0.97 |
Saudi Arabia | 2021 | 1.01 |
Senegal | 2021 | 1.16 |
Serbia | 2021 | 1 |
Seychelles | 2021 | 1.03 |
Sierra Leone | 2021 | 1.04 |
Singapore | 2020 | 1 |
Slovakia | 2020 | 1 |
Slovenia | 2020 | 1 |
Somalia | 2007 | 0.55 |
South Africa | 2020 | 0.96 |
South Korea | ||
South Sudan | 2015 | 0.71 |
Spain | 2020 | 1.01 |
Sri Lanka | 2020 | 1 |
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistical composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which is used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. A country scores a higher level of HDI when the lifespan is higher, the education level is higher, and the gross national income GNI (PPP) per capita is higher. It was developed by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq and was further used to measure a country's development by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)'s Human Development Report Office.
The Human Poverty Index (HPI) was an indication of the poverty of community in a country, developed by the United Nations to complement the Human Development Index (HDI) and was first reported as part of the Human Development Report in 1997. It is developed by United Nations Development Program which also publishes indexes like HDI It was considered to better reflect the extent of deprivation in deprived countries compared to the HDI. In 2010, it was supplanted by the UN's Multidimensional Poverty Index.
The Gender Development Index (GDI) is an index designed to measure gender equality.
The Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) is an index designed to measure gender equality. GEM is the United Nations Development Programme's attempt to measure the extent of gender inequality across the globe's countries, based on estimates of women's relative economic income, participation in high-paying positions with economic power, and access to professional and parliamentary positions. It was introduced at the same time as the Gender-related Development Index (GDI) but measures topics like empowerment that are not covered by that index. Since it was first adopted, the GEM has been employed in several academic studies related to empowerment as a reliable metric for comparing gender empowerment across different countries. It has also faced some harsh criticisms, and many alterations and alternatives have been proposed.
The where-to-be-born index was an index last published by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) in 2013, which aimed to measure which country would provide the best opportunities for a healthy, safe and prosperous life in the years after its publication.
Gender inequality in India refers to health, education, economic and political inequalities between men and women in India. Various international gender inequality indices rank India differently on each of these factors, as well as on a composite basis, and these indices are controversial.
The Global Gender Gap Report is an index designed to measure gender equality. It was first published in 2006 by the World Economic Forum.
The Gender Inequality Index (GII) is an index for the measurement of gender disparity that was introduced in the 2010 Human Development Report 20th anniversary edition by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). According to the UNDP, this index is a composite measure to quantify the loss of achievement within a country due to gender inequality. It uses three dimensions to measure opportunity cost: reproductive health, empowerment, and labor market participation. The new index was introduced as an experimental measure to remedy the shortcomings of the previous indicators, the Gender Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), both of which were introduced in the 1995 Human Development Report.
Females in Nigeria have a basic human right to be educated, and this right has been recognized since the year 1948 adoption of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) According to a report in 2014, female education has an important impact on the development of a stable, prosperous and healthy nation state resulting in active, productive and empowered citizens. Educating girls develop growth rates, encourages independence of the girl child and reduces social disparities. In 2009, the Nigerian Population Council (NPC) observed that women with higher educational qualifications are more likely to be in formal wage employment than those at the level of primary school education.
Female participation and advancement in majority Muslim countries, or nations in which more than 50% of the population identifies as an adherent of the Islamic faith, have traditionally been areas of controversy. Several Western nations, such as the United States and Western Europe, have criticised majority Muslim nations for the lack of involvement and opportunity for women in the private sector.
Sudan is a developing nation that faces many challenges in regard to gender inequality. Freedom House gave Sudan the lowest possible ranking among repressive regimes during 2012. South Sudan received a slightly higher rating but it was also rated as "not free". In the 2013 report of 2012 data, Sudan ranks 171st out of 186 countries on the Human Development Index (HDI). Sudan also is one of very few countries that are not a signatory on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
The socioeconomic impact of female education constitutes a significant area of research within international development. Increases in the amount of female education in regions tends to correlate with high levels of development. Some of the effects are related to economic development. Women's education increases the income of women and leads to growth in GDP. Other effects are related to social development. Educating girls leads to a number of social benefits, including many related to women's empowerment.
Gender inequality in Mexico refers to disparate freedoms in health, education, and economic and political abilities between men and women in Mexico. It has been diminishing throughout history, but continues to persist in many forms including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, the gender pay gap, and high rates of domestic violence and femicide. As of 2022, the World Economic Forum ranks Mexico 31st in terms of gender equality out of 146 countries. Structural gender inequality is relatively homogeneous between the Mexican states as there are very few regional differences in the inequalities present.
Measures of gender equality or inequality are statistical tools employed to quantify the concept of gender equality.
Education is something that takes place in the Arab World where there is a tradition for learning and prospering academically. UNESCO sources agree that the average rate of adult literacy is 76.9%. Each of the Arab-majority states are members of the Arab League.
Women's empowerment may be defined in several ways, including accepting women's viewpoints, making an effort to seek them and raising the status of women through education, awareness, literacy, and training. Women's empowerment equips and allows women to make life-determining decisions through the different societal problems. They may have the opportunity to re-define gender roles or other such roles, which allow them more freedom to pursue desired goals.
Sustainable Development Goal 4 is about quality education and is among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations in September 2015. The full title of SDG 4 is "Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all".
Education inequality in Ghana exists in multiple dimensions, with significant disparities occurring along gender, wealth, and geographical divides. Improvements have been made by both government and civic organizations.
Gender parity is a statistical measure used to describe ratios between men and women, or boys and girls, in a given population. Gender parity may refer to the proportionate representation of men and women in a given group, also referred to as sex ratio, or it may mean the ratio between any quantifiable indicator among men against the same indicator among women.