Global Peace Index (GPI) is a report produced by the Australia-based NGO Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) which measures the relative position of nations' and regions' peacefulness. [2] The GPI ranks 163 independent states and territories (collectively accounting for 99.7 per cent of the world's population) according to their levels of peacefulness. In the past decade, the GPI has presented trends of increased global violence and less peacefulness. [3]
The GPI (Global Peace Index) is developed in consultation with an international panel of peace experts from peace institutes and think tanks with data collected by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The Index was first launched in 2007, [4] with subsequent reports being released annually. In 2015 it ranked 165 countries, up from 121 in 2007. The study was conceived by Australian technology entrepreneur Steve Killelea, and is endorsed by individuals such as former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the Dalai Lama, and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari.[ citation needed ] The updated index is released each year at events in London, Washington, D.C., and at the United Nations Secretariat in New York City.
The 2024 GPI indicates Iceland, Ireland, Austria, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, Portugal, Denmark, Slovenia and Malaysia to be the most peaceful countries, while Yemen, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Congo, Russia, Syria, Israel and Mali to be the least peaceful. [5] [6] Among the top 7 most populous nations accounting for over half of the world's population and approximately half of the total GDP of the world, Indonesia ranks 48th overall on the Global Peace Index, China 88th, India 116th, Brazil 131st, the United States 132nd, [5] Pakistan 140th and Nigeria 147th. Findings of the 2024 GPI indicate a less peaceful world over the last 16 years, a 6 per cent deterioration in the global level of peace over the preceding 16 years, and a growing inequality in peace between the most and least peaceful countries.
Ten indicators broadly assess what might be described as safety and security in society. Their assertion is that low crime rates, minimal incidences of terrorist acts and violent demonstrations, harmonious relations with neighbouring countries, a stable political scene, and a small proportion of the population being internally displaced or refugees can be suggestive of peacefulness. [7]
In 2017, 23 indicators were used to establish peacefulness scores for each country. The indicators were originally selected with the assistance of an expert panel in 2007 and are reviewed by the expert panel on an annual basis. The scores for each indicator are normalised on a scale of 1–5, whereby qualitative indicators are banded into five groupings, and quantitative ones are scored from 1–5, to the third decimal point. A table of the indicators is below. [8] In the table, UCDP stands for the Uppsala Conflict Data Program maintained by the University of Uppsala in Sweden, EIU for The Economist Intelligence Unit, UNSCT for the United Nations Survey of Criminal Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, ICPS is the International Centre for Prison Studies at King's College London, IISS for the International Institute for Strategic Studies publication The Military Balance, and SIPRI for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Arms Transfers Database.
Indicator | Source | Coding | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Number and duration of internal conflicts [a] | UCDP, IEP | Total number |
2 | Number of deaths from external organized conflict | UCDP Armed Conflict Dataset | Total number |
3 | Number of deaths from internal organized conflict | International Institute for Strategic Studies, Armed Conflict Database | Total number |
4 | Number, duration, and role in external conflicts | UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset, IEP | Total number |
5 | Intensity of organized internal conflict | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
6 | Relations with neighbouring countries | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
7 | Level of perceived criminality in society | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
8 | Number of refugees and displaced persons as percentage of population | UNHCR and IDMC | Refugee population by country or territory of origin, plus the number of a country's internally displaced people (IDP's) as a percentage of the country's total population |
9 | Political instability | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
10 | Impact of terrorism | Global Terrorism Index (IEP) | Quantitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
11 | Political terror | Amnesty International and US State Department | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
12 | Number of homicides per 100,000 people | UNODC Surveys on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems (CTS); EIU estimates | Total number |
13 | Level of violent crime | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
14 | Likelihood of violent demonstrations | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
15 | Number of jailed persons per 100,000 people | World Prison Brief, Institute for Criminal Policy Research at Birkbeck, University of London | Total number |
16 | Number of internal security officers and police per 100,000 people | UNODC CTS; EIU estimates | Total number; Civil police force distinct from national guards or local militia [b] |
17 | Military expenditure as a percentage of GDP | The Military Balance and IISS | Cash outlays of central or federal government to meet costs of national armed forces, as a percentage of GDP, scores from 1 to 5 based on percentages [c] |
18 | Number of armed-services personnel per 100,000 | The Military Balance and IISS | All full-time active armed-services personnel |
19 | Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons as recipient (imports) per 100,000 people | SIPRI Arms Transfers Database | Imports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people [d] |
20 | Volume of transfers of major conventional weapons as supplier (exports) per 100,000 people | SIPRI Arms Transfers Database | Exports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people |
21 | Financial contribution to UN peacekeeping missions | United Nations Committee on Contributions and IEP | Percentage of countries' "outstanding payments versus their annual assessment to the budget of the current peacekeeping missions" over an average of three years, scored from 1–5 scale based on percentage of promised contributions met |
22 | Nuclear and heavy weapons capability | The Military Balance, IISS, SIPRI, UN Register of Conventional Arms and IEP | 1–5 scale based on accumulated points; 1 point per armoured vehicle and artillery pieces, 5 points per tank, 20 points per combat aircraft, 100 points per warship, 1000 points for aircraft carrier and nuclear submarine [e] |
23 | Ease of access to small arms and light weapons | EIU | Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5 |
Indicators not already ranked on a 1 to 5 scale were converted by using the following formula: x = [x - min(x)] / [max(x) - min(x)], where max(x) and min(x) are the highest and lowest values for that indicator of the countries ranked in the index. The 0 to 1 scores that resulted were then converted to the 1 to 5 scale. Individual indicators were then weighted according to the expert panel's judgment of their importance. The scores were then tabulated into two weighted sub-indices: internal peace, weighted at 60% of a country's final score, and external peace, weighted at 40% of a country's final score. "Negative Peace", defined as the absence of violence or of the fear of violence, is used as the definition of peace to create the Global Peace Index. An additional aim of the GPI database is to facilitate deeper study of the concept of positive peace, or those attitudes, institutions, and structures that drive peacefulness in society. The GPI also examines relationships between peace and reliable international measures, including democracy and transparency, education and material well-being. As such, it seeks to understand the relative importance of a range of potential determinants, or "drivers", which may influence the nurturing of peaceful societies, both internally and externally. [9]
Statistical analysis is applied to GPI data to uncover specific conditions conducive of peace. Researchers have determined that Positive Peace, which includes the attitudes, institutions, and structures that pre-empt conflict and facilitate functional societies, is the main driver of peace. The eight pillars of positive peace are well-functioning government, sound business environment, acceptance of the rights of others, good relations with neighbours, free flow of information, high levels of human capital, low levels of corruption, and equitable distribution of resources. Well-functioning government, low levels of corruption, acceptance of the rights of others, and good relations with neighbours are more important in countries suffering from high levels of violence. Free flow of information and sound business environment become more important when a country is approaching the global average level of peacefulness, also described as the Mid-Peace level. Low levels of corruption is the only Pillar that is strongly significant across all three levels of peacefulness. This suggests it is an important transformational factor at all stages of a nation's development.
Rank | Country | Score | Change |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Iceland | 1.112 | |
2 | Ireland | 1.303 | |
3 | Austria | 1.313 | 1 |
4 | New Zealand | 1.323 | 1 |
5 | Singapore | 1.339 | 3 |
6 | Switzerland | 1.35 | 3 |
7 | Portugal | 1.372 | 1 |
8 | Denmark | 1.382 | 3 |
9 | Slovenia | 1.395 | 2 |
10 | Malaysia | 1.427 | 2 |
11 | Canada | 1.449 | 1 |
12 | Czech Republic | 1.459 | 1 |
13 | Finland | 1.474 | 2 |
14 | Hungary | 1.502 | 4 |
15 | Croatia | 1.504 | 1 |
16 | Belgium | 1.51 | 2 |
17 | Japan | 1.525 | 4 |
18 | Netherlands | 1.527 | 1 |
19 | Australia | 1.536 | 2 |
20 | Germany | 1.542 | 4 |
21 | Bhutan | 1.564 | 3 |
22 | Mauritius | 1.577 | |
23 | Spain | 1.597 | 7 |
24 | Estonia | 1.615 | 3 |
25 | Kuwait | 1.622 | 1 |
26 | Bulgaria | 1.629 | 5 |
27 | Slovakia | 1.634 | 2 |
28 | Norway | 1.638 | 5 |
29 | Qatar | 1.656 | 9 |
30 | Latvia | 1.661 | 3 |
31 | Lithuania | 1.672 | 6 |
32 | Poland | 1.678 | 3 |
33 | Italy | 1.692 | |
34 | United Kingdom | 1.703 | 2 |
35 | Montenegro | 1.746 | 5 |
36 | Romania | 1.755 | 1 |
37 | Oman | 1.761 | 4 |
38 | North Macedonia | 1.764 | 2 |
39 | Sweden | 1.782 | 5 |
40 | Greece | 1.793 | 17 |
41 | Vietnam | 1.802 | 3 |
42 | Albania | 1.809 | 3 |
43 | Taiwan | 1.818 | 1 |
44 | Madagascar | 1.838 | 2 |
45 | Mongolia | 1.845 | |
46 | South Korea | 1.848 | 6 |
47 | Argentina | 1.855 | 2 |
48 | Indonesia | 1.857 | 4 |
49 | Laos | 1.861 | 1 |
50 | Botswana | 1.863 | 3 |
51 | East Timor | 1.882 | 3 |
52 | Uruguay | 1.893 | 3 |
53 | United Arab Emirates | 1.897 | 31 |
54 | Serbia | 1.93 | 8 |
55 | Ghana | 1.938 | 5 |
56 | Kosovo | 1.945 | 3 |
57 | Zambia | 1.948 | 2 |
58 | Costa Rica | 1.95 | 5 |
59 | Kazakhstan | 1.954 | 19 |
60 | Uzbekistan | 1.957 | 15 |
61 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.961 | 5 |
62 | Namibia | 1.972 | 1 |
63 | Moldova | 1.976 | 2 |
64 | Chile | 1.978 | 10 |
65 | Tanzania | 1.987 | 11 |
66 | Sierra Leone | 1.993 | 23 |
67 | Jordan | 1.998 | 9 |
68 | Bolivia | 2.009 | 2 |
69 | Liberia | 2.025 | 5 |
70 | Cambodia | 2.028 | 6 |
71 | Tajikistan | 2.035 | 19 |
72 | Angola | 2.043 | 19 |
73 | Paraguay | 2.044 | 4 |
74 | Tunisia | 2.044 | 6 |
75 | Thailand | 2.048 | 11 |
76 | Armenia | 2.052 | 2 |
77 | Kyrgyzstan | 2.053 | 18 |
78 | Morocco | 2.054 | 14 |
79 | Malawi | 2.063 | 12 |
80 | Nepal | 2.069 | 12 |
81 | Bahrain | 2.072 | 16 |
82 | The Gambia | 2.079 | 13 |
83 | Turkmenistan | 2.079 | 2 |
84 | Senegal | 2.084 | 15 |
85 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.085 | 12 |
86 | France | 2.088 | 14 |
87 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2.092 | 10 |
88 | China | 2.101 | 6 |
89 | Cyprus | 2.101 | 5 |
90 | Algeria | 2.11 | 2 |
91 | Jamaica | 2.119 | 2 |
92 | Rwanda | 2.12 | 4 |
93 | Bangladesh | 2.126 | 8 |
94 | Equatorial Guinea | 2.132 | 14 |
95 | Mauritania | 2.136 | 6 |
96 | Panama | 2.14 | 9 |
97 | Dominican Republic | 2.157 | 5 |
98 | Cuba | 2.16 | |
99 | Peru | 2.179 | 5 |
100 | Georgia | 2.195 | 6 |
101 | Sri Lanka | 2.195 | 1 |
102 | Saudi Arabia | 2.206 | 5 |
103 | Eswatini | 2.209 | 3 |
104 | Philippines | 2.21 | 4 |
105 | Egypt | 2.212 | 4 |
106 | Azerbaijan | 2.248 | 3 |
107 | El Salvador | 2.25 | 21 |
108 | Mozambique | 2.25 | 3 |
109 | Ivory Coast | 2.255 | 9 |
110 | Republic of the Congo | 2.261 | 6 |
111 | Guyana | 2.286 | 1 |
112 | Belarus | 2.291 | 3 |
113 | Nicaragua | 2.295 | 12 |
114 | Benin | 2.306 | 1 |
115 | Papua New Guinea | 2.315 | 10 |
116 | India | 2.319 | 5 |
117 | Guatemala | 2.332 | |
118 | Gabon | 2.372 | 18 |
119 | Djibouti | 2.374 | 8 |
120 | Togo | 2.381 | 2 |
121 | Zimbabwe | 2.396 | 1 |
122 | Kenya | 2.409 | 3 |
123 | Honduras | 2.415 | 1 |
124 | Guinea | 2.423 | 2 |
125 | Lesotho | 2.461 | 3 |
126 | Uganda | 2.477 | 3 |
127 | South Africa | 2.507 | 2 |
128 | Libya | 2.528 | 4 |
129 | Burundi | 2.567 | 2 |
130 | Ecuador | 2.572 | 16 |
131 | Brazil | 2.589 | |
132 | United States | 2.622 | 2 |
133 | Iran | 2.682 | 10 |
134 | Lebanon | 2.693 | 1 |
135 | Chad | 2.704 | 5 |
136 | Eritrea | 2.748 | 5 |
137 | Cameroon | 2.773 | 1 |
138 | Mexico | 2.778 | 1 |
139 | Turkey | 2.78 | |
140 | Pakistan | 2.783 | 2 |
141 | Niger | 2.792 | 6 |
142 | Venezuela | 2.821 | 3 |
143 | Haiti | 2.827 | 9 |
144 | Ethiopia | 2.845 | 5 |
145 | Palestine | 2.872 | 9 |
146 | Colombia | 2.887 | |
147 | Nigeria | 2.907 | |
148 | Myanmar | 2.943 | 6 |
149 | Burkina Faso | 2.969 | 1 |
150 | Central African Republic | 3.009 | 1 |
151 | Iraq | 3.045 | 2 |
152 | North Korea | 3.055 | 2 |
153 | Somalia | 3.091 | 2 |
154 | Mali | 3.095 | 2 |
155 | Israel | 3.115 | 11 |
156 | Syria | 3.173 | 2 |
157 | Russia | 3.249 | 2 |
158 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 3.264 | 4 |
159 | Ukraine | 3.28 | 3 |
160 | Afghanistan | 3.294 | |
161 | South Sudan | 3.324 | 2 |
162 | Sudan | 3.327 | 5 |
163 | Yemen | 3.397 | 2 |
Note: The GPI's methodology is updated regularly and is improved to reflect the most up-to-date datasets. Each year's GPI report includes a detailed description of the methodology used. Also, the data is revised periodically and so values from previous years may change accordingly.
These tables contain the scores and ranking published in the official annual reports, for the latest revised data please visit the Interactive world map of the Global Peace Index Archived 2022-07-16 at the Wayback Machine .
The Index has received endorsements as a political project from a number of major international figures, including the former Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan; former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari; the Dalai Lama; Archbishop Desmond Tutu; Muhammad Yunus; and former United States President Jimmy Carter. [11]
Jeffrey Sachs at Columbia University said: "The GPI continues its pioneering work in drawing the world's attention to the massive resources we are squandering in violence and conflict." [12] Some at Australian National University say that the GPI report presents "the latest and most comprehensive global data on trends in peace, violence and war" and "provides the world's best analysis of the statistical factors associated with long-term peace, as well as economic analysis on the macroeconomic impacts of everyday violence and war on the global economy." [13]
According to The Economist, the weighting of military expenditure "may seem to give heart to freeloaders: countries that enjoy peace precisely because others (often the USA) care for their defence". [14]
The Global Peace Index has been criticized for not including indicators specifically relating to violence against women and children. [15]
The impact of Global Peace Index has been lower on the academic study of war and peace than on international organizations. [16]
Genuine progress indicator (GPI) is a metric that has been suggested to replace, or supplement, gross domestic product (GDP). The GPI is designed to take fuller account of the well-being of a nation, only a part of which pertains to the size of the nation's economy, by incorporating environmental and social factors which are not measured by GDP. For instance, some models of GPI decrease in value when the poverty rate increases. The GPI separates the concept of societal progress from economic growth.
The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) is an economic indicator intended to replace the gross domestic product (GDP), which is the main macroeconomic indicator of System of National Accounts (SNA). Rather than simply adding together all expenditures like the GDP, consumer spending is balanced by such factors as income distribution and cost associated with pollution and other unsustainable costs. The calculation excludes defence expenditures and considers a wider range of harmful effects of economic growth. It is similar to the genuine progress indicator (GPI).
The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index that scores and ranks countries by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as assessed by experts and business executives. The CPI generally defines corruption as an "abuse of entrusted power for private gain". The index is published annually by the non-governmental organisation Transparency International since 1995.
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact that was introduced by the New Economics Foundation in 2006. Each country's HPI value is a function of its average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and ecological footprint per capita. The exact function is a little more complex, but conceptually it approximates multiplying life satisfaction and life expectancy and dividing that by the ecological footprint. The index is weighted to give progressively higher scores to nations with lower ecological footprints.
Based on a long-standing research program of the World Bank, the Worldwide Governance Indicators capture six key dimensions of governance between 1996 and present. They measure the quality of governance in over 200 countries, based on close to 40 data sources produced by over 30 organizations worldwide and are updated annually since 2002.
Stephen Killelea AM is an Australian IT entrepreneur and founder of the Institute for Economics and Peace, a global think tank.
The Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) is a data collection program on organized violence, based at Uppsala University in Sweden. The UCDP is a leading provider of data on organized violence and armed conflict, and it is the oldest ongoing data collection project for civil war, with a history of almost 40 years. UCDP data are systematically collected and have global coverage, comparability across cases and countries, and long time series. Data are updated annually and are publicly available, free of charge. Furthermore, preliminary data on events of organized violence in Africa is released on a monthly basis.
UNESCO defined the Gender Parity Index (GPI) as a socioeconomic index usually designed to measure the relative access to education of males and females. It is used by international organizations particularly in measuring the progress of developing countries. For example, some UNESCO documents consider gender parity in literacy.
Canada is recognized in international rankings for a variety of reasons, ranging from its high standard of living to its strong economy and political stability. Canada ranks high on its social, legal, healthcare and education systems with its universities ranked among the best in the world. The country consistently ranks high in other various indices measuring factors such as human rights, quality of life, safety, happiness, prosperity and sustainability. This has led to Canada being recognized as one of the best countries in the world to live. Despite these facts there are varied domestic concerns, Canada ranks among the lowest of the most developed countries for housing affordability, technology affordability, healthcare accessibility, and foreign direct investment.
These are the international rankings of the Netherlands.
The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) is a global think tank headquartered in Sydney, Australia with branches in New York City, Mexico City and Oxford. IEP studies the relationship between peace, business, and prosperity, and seeks to promote understanding of the cultural, economic, and political factors that drive peacefulness. It is a registered Australian charity and works in partnership with the Aspen Institute, Economists for Peace and Security the United Nations Global Compact, Center for Strategic and International Studies and Cranfield University. It also collaborates with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the Commonwealth Secretariat, UNDP and UN Peacebuilding Support Office. It is chaired by technology entrepreneur Steve Killelea, founder of IR.
Multidimensional Poverty Indices uses a range of indicators to calculate a summary poverty figure for a given population, in which a larger figure indicates a higher level of poverty. This figure considers both the proportion of the population that is deemed poor and the 'breadth' of poverty experienced by these 'poor' households, following the Alkire & Foster 'counting method'. The method was developed following increased criticism of monetary and consumption-based poverty measures, seeking to capture the deprivations in non-monetary factors that contribute towards well-being. While there is a standard set of indicators, dimensions, cutoffs and thresholds used for a 'Global MPI', the method is flexible and there are many examples of poverty studies that modify it to best suit their environment. The methodology has been mainly, but not exclusively, applied to developing countries.
The United States Peace Index (USPI) is a measurement of states and cities in the US by their peacefulness. Created by the Institute for Economics and Peace, the creators of the Global Peace Index, it is said to be the first in a series of National sub-divisions by their peacefulness. The USPI was created first due to plentiful data and a large amount of diversity between states for level of peace. The United States ranked 88/158 on the Global Peace index for 2012. The U.S. index was released on 6 April 2011 and the second edition was released on 24 April 2012.
The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) is a analysis tool created by the World Bank. It is the combination of the weighted average of the country scores on six key dimensions: customs performance, infrastructure quality, ease of arranging shipments, logistics services quality, consignments tracking and tracing and timeliness of shipments as well as practical data measuring logistics efficiency. This measure indicates the relative ease and efficiency with which products can be moved into and inside a country. Singapore and Finland are the most efficient and highest ranked LPI countries as per the 2023 LPI.
The Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) is a scoring system designed by the German environmental and development organisation Germanwatch e.V. to enhance transparency in international climate politics. On the basis of standardised criteria, the index evaluates and compares the climate protection performance of 63 countries and the European Union (EU), which are together responsible for more than 90% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) is a report published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), and was developed by IT entrepreneur and IEP's founder Steve Killelea. The index provides a comprehensive summary of the key global trends and patterns in terrorism since 2000. It is an attempt to systematically rank the nations of the world according to terrorist activity. The index combines a number of factors associated with terrorist attacks to build an explicit picture of the impact of terrorism, illustrating trends, and providing a data series for analysis by researchers and policymakers. It produces a composite score in order to provide an ordinal ranking of countries on the impact of terrorism.
The United Kingdom Peace Index (UKPI) is a measurement of the United Kingdom's cities by their peacefulness. Created by the Institute for Economics and Peace, the creators of the Global Peace Index and the United States Peace Index, the United Kingdom ranked 29/158 on the Global Peace index for 2012. The UKPI was released in April 2013 and provides a comprehensive measure of the levels of peacefulness within the United Kingdom from 2003 to 2012. Peace is defined as the absence of violence or the absence of the fear of violence. The UKPI also provides an analysis of the socio-economic factors associated with peacefulness, as well as an estimate of the economic benefits that would flow from increases in peace.
The Mexico Peace Index (MPI) is one in a series of National Peace Indices produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). The MPI provides a comprehensive measure of peacefulness in Mexico, the fifth edition of the MPI was released in 2017. The report is released in both Spanish and English, and analyzes the economic benefits that would occur from increases in peace, and provides an estimate relating to the economic impact violence has had on Mexico.
The World Happiness Report is a publication that contains articles and rankings of national happiness, based on respondent ratings of their own lives, which the report also correlates with various life factors.
Sustainable Development Goal 16 is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations in 2015, the official wording is: "Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels". The Goal has 12 targets and 23 indicators.