0-1 1-3 3-5 5-7 | 7-9 9-11 11-13 13-15 | 15-20 20+ No data |
The Gallagher index measures an electoral system's relative disproportionality between votes received and seats in a legislature. [1] [2] As such, it measures the difference between the percentage of votes each party gets and the percentage of seats each party gets in the resulting legislature, and it also measures this disproportionality from all parties collectively in any one given election. That collective disproportionality from the election is given a precise score, which can then be used in comparing various levels of proportionality among various elections from various electoral systems. [3] The Gallagher index is a statistical analysis methodology utilised within political science, notably the branch of psephology.
Michael Gallagher, who created the index, referred to it as a "least squares index", inspired by the sum of squares of residuals used in the method of least squares. The index is therefore commonly abbreviated as "LSq" even though the measured allocation is not necessarily a least squares fit. The Gallagher index is computed by taking the square root of half the sum of the squares of the difference between percent of votes () and percent of seats () for each of the political parties (). [4]
The division by 2 gives an index whose values range between 0 and 100. The larger the differences between the percentage of the votes and the percentage of seats summed over all parties, the larger the Gallagher index. The larger the index value the larger the disproportionality and vice versa. Michael Gallagher included "other" parties as a whole category, and Arend Lijphart modified it, excluding those parties. Compared to the Loosemore–Hanby index, the Gallagher index is more sensitive to large discrepancies. [6] Other indices measuring the proportionality between seat share and party vote share are the Loosemore–Hanby index, Rae index, and the Sainte-Laguë Index.
The first publication of the use of least squares in measuring the dis-proportionality of election outcomes was by Michael Gallagher in 1991 [7] in which he writes: "These [election] indices were originally outlined in Markku Laakso and Rein Taagepera, ‘ “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to west Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 12:1 (1979), pp. 3–27 (effective number of parties), and Michael Gallagher, ‘Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems’, Electoral Studies 10:1 (1991), pp. 33–51 (least squares index)."
The Gallagher index gained considerable attention in Canada in December 2016 in the context of efforts to reform Canada's electoral system. [8] [9] The Special Committee on Electoral Reform (a Parliamentary Committee) recommended "that the Government should, as it develops a new electoral system, use the Gallagher index in order to minimize the level of distortion between the popular will of the electorate and the resultant seat allocations in Parliament." The committee recommended that "the government should seek to design a system that achieves a Gallagher score of 5 or less." [10] [11]
In the 2015 Canadian federal election, the Gallagher index was 12.02, where 0 would be a perfectly proportional election outcome. [12]
Party | Votes (%) | Seats (%) | Difference | Difference squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | 39.47% | 54.44% | 14.97 | 224.1009 | |
Conservatives | 31.89% | 29.29% | -2.6 | 6.76 | |
New Democratic | 19.71% | 13.02% | -6.69 | 44.7561 | |
Bloc Québecois | 4.66% | 2.96% | -1.7 | 2.89 | |
Green | 3.45% | 0.29% | -3.16 | 9.9856 | |
Other | 0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82 | 0.6724 | |
Total of differences squared | 289.165 | ||||
Total / 2 | 144.5825 | ||||
Square root of (Total / 2): Gallagher Index result | 12.02 |
This table uses for example the 2012 Queensland state election, one of the largest landslides in Australian electoral history. Though Australia and New Zealand have somewhat similar political histories, Australia uses preferential voting in Single-member districts for Commonwealth House of Representative and most state and territory Legislative Assembly elections, which tends to result in far less proportionality compared to New Zealand's MMP system (or other proportional electoral systems), especially for larger minor parties, such as The Greens or, historically, the Australian Democrats. The 2012 Queensland election had an extremely high Gallagher Index, at 31.16, due to the massive landslide in seats for the victorious LNP. The LNP gained 88% of the seats with less than 50% of the vote. Most recent Australian state and federal elections however score between 10 and 12.
Party | Votes (%) | Seats (%) | Difference | Difference squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal National | 49.65% | 87.64% | 37.99 | 1443.2401 | |
Labor | 26.66% | 7.87% | -18.79 | 353.0641 | |
Katter | 11.53% | 2.25% | -9.28 | 86.1184 | |
Greens | 7.53% | 0.00% | -7.53 | 56.7009 | |
Other | 1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47 | 2.1609 | |
Independent | 3.16% | 2.25% | -0.91 | 0.8281 | |
Total of differences squared | 1942.1125 | ||||
Total / 2 | 971.0563 | ||||
Square root of (Total / 2): Gallagher Index result | 31.16 |
The 7 political groups of the European Parliament instead of the 203 political parties [13] allow a concise calculation of disproportionality between votes and seats. The Gallagher index for the European Parliament is 7.87.
Party | Votes (%) | Seats (%) | Difference | Difference squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPP | 20.80% | 24.23% | 3.43 | 11.7649 | |
S&D | 17.88% | 20.51% | 2.63 | 6.9169 | |
RE | 12.01% | 14.38% | 2.37 | 5.6169 | |
G/EFA | 10.04% | 9.85% | -0.19 | 0.0361 | |
ID | 10.59% | 9.72% | -0.87 | 0.7569 | |
ECR | 7.17% | 8.26% | 1.09 | 1.1881 | |
GUE/NGL | 5.16% | 5.46% | 0.3 | 0.09 | |
NI | 6.52% | 7.59% | 1.07 | 1.1449 | |
Wasted vote | 9.82% | 0.00% | -9.82 | 96.4324 | |
Total of differences squared | 123.9471 | ||||
Total / 2 | 61.9736 | ||||
Square root of (Total / 2): Gallagher Index result | 7.87 |
The disproportionality of the 2022 Swedish general election was 0.64 according to the Gallagher index, which is extremely low by international standards (resulting in almost perfectly proportional seat allocations), due to Sweden's use of the modified Sainte-Laguë method in elections to the Riksdag.
The disproportionality of the 2020 Irish general election was 1.96 according to the Gallagher index. The Republic of Ireland uses the single transferable vote (STV) system with Droop quota in elections to the Dáil Éireann.
This table uses the aggregate results of the 2012 elections to the United States House of Representatives. These 435 single-seat elections are winner-take-all, which would tend to create disproportionate results, but this is moderated by the extremely high share of votes obtained by the two major parties—more than 96%, likely in part caused by fears of wasted votes and vote splitting. The Gallagher index ignores the effect of the primaries on the proportionality.
Party | Votes (%) | Seats (%) | Difference | Difference squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican Party | 47.66% | 53.80% | 6.14 | 37.6996 | |
Democratic Party | 48.77% | 44.20% | -4.57 | 20.8849 | |
Libertarian Party | 1.11% | 0.00% | -1.11 | 1.2321 | |
Independents and minor parties | 1.01% | 0.00% | -1.01 | 1.0201 | |
Green Party | 0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31 | 0.0961 | |
Others | 1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13 | 1.2769 | |
Total of differences squared | 62.2097 | ||||
Total / 2 | 31.1049 | ||||
Square root of (Total / 2): Gallagher Index result | 5.58 |
The 2024 general election in the United Kingdom was the most disproportional in modern British history. [15] The Liberal Democrats recorded their best ever seat result (72), despite receiving only around half the votes they did in 2010, [16] and fewer votes overall than Reform, although the party's seat share was again lower than its share of the vote. Advocacy group Make Votes Matter found that 58% of voters did not vote for their elected MP. Make Votes Matter spokesman Steve Gilmore, Electoral Reform Society chief Darren Hughes, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and the Green Party of England and Wales co-leader Adrian Ramsay were among the figures that called for electoral reform in the wake of the election. The campaigners said it was the "most disproportionate election in [British] history". [17] [18]
Party | Votes (%) | Seats (%) | Difference | Difference squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | 33.70% | 63.23% | 29.53 | 872.0209 | |
Conservative | 23.70% | 18.62% | -5.08 | 25.8064 | |
Reform UK | 14.29% | 0.77% | -13.52 | 182.7904 | |
Liberal Democrats | 12.22% | 11.08% | -1.14 | 1.2996 | |
Green | 6.39% | 0.46% | -5.93 | 35.1649 | |
Independents | 1.96% | 0.92% | -1.04 | 1.0816 | |
Others | 7.74% | 4.92% | -2.82 | 7.9524 | |
Total of differences squared | 1126.1162 | ||||
Total / 2 | 563.0581 | ||||
Square root of (Total / 2): Gallagher Index result | 23.73 |
One tool that has been developed to measure an electoral system's relative disproportionality between votes received and seats allotted in a legislature is the Gallagher Index, which was developed by Michael Gallagher (who appeared before the Committee).
...Professor Becker developed the "Gallagher Index Composite" for the Committee's study...
Proportional representation (PR) refers to any type of electoral system under which subgroups of an electorate are reflected proportionately in the elected body. The concept applies mainly to political divisions among voters. The essence of such systems is that all votes cast – or almost all votes cast – contribute to the result and are effectively used to help elect someone. Under other election systems, a bare plurality or a scant majority are all that are used to elect candidates. PR systems provide balanced representation to different factions, reflecting how votes are cast.
The additional-member system (AMS) is a two-vote seat-linkage-based mixed electoral system used in the United Kingdom in which most representatives are elected in single-member districts (SMDs), and a fixed number of other "additional members" are elected from a closed list to make the seat distribution in the chamber more proportional to the votes cast for party lists. It is distinct from using parallel voting for the list seats in that the "additional member" seats are awarded to parties taking into account seats won in SMDs – these are ignored under parallel voting.
Mixed-member proportional representation is a type of representation provided by some mixed electoral systems which combine local winner-take-all elections with a compensatory tier with party lists, in a way that produces proportional representation overall. Like proportional representation, MMP is not a single system, but a principle and goal of several similar systems. Some systems designed to achieve proportionality are still called mixed-member proportional, even if they generally fall short of full proportionality. In this case, they provide semi-proportional representation.
The D'Hondt method, also called the Jefferson method or the greatest divisors method, is an apportionment method for allocating seats in parliaments among federal states, or in proportional representation among political parties. It belongs to the class of highest-averages methods. Compared to ideal proportional representation, the D'Hondt method reduces somewhat the political fragmentation for smaller electoral district sizes, where it favors larger political parties over small parties.
The Webster method, also called the Sainte-Laguë method, is a highest averages apportionment method for allocating seats in a parliament among federal states, or among parties in a party-list proportional representation system. The Sainte-Laguë method shows a more equal seats-to-votes ratio for different sized parties among apportionment methods.
Electoral reform in New Zealand has been a political issue in the past as major changes have been made to both parliamentary and local government electoral systems.
The Canadian electoral system is based on a parliamentary system of government modelled on that of the United Kingdom.
Canada holds elections for legislatures or governments in several jurisdictions: for the federal (national) government, provincial and territorial governments, and municipal governments. Elections are also held for self-governing First Nations and for many other public and private organizations including corporations and trade unions. Municipal elections can also be held for both upper-tier and lower-tier governments.
The single-chamber Parliament of Georgia has 150 members, elected for a four-year term through elections. The last presidential elections were held in October 2018 due to constitutional changes taking effect in 2024, after which the president will be elected for a five-year term by a parliamentary college of electors. The series of constitutional changes, initiated in 2017, stipulated a one-time transitional presidential term of six years for 2018–2024. Other major systemic changes included a move to a fully proportional system by 2024 with a 5% threshold.
The New Zealand parliamentary electoral system has been based on the principle of mixed-member proportional (MMP) since the 1996 election. MMP was introduced following a referendum in 1993. It replaced the first-past-the-post (FPP) system New Zealand had previously used for most of its history. Under the MMP system, New Zealanders have two secret ballot votes to elect members of Parliament (MPs). The first vote is for a candidate from an electorate, a geographic electoral district. The second is the party vote for the political party the voter wants to form the government.
Michael Gallagher is a political scientist. He is Professor of Comparative Politics and head of the Department of Political Science at the Trinity College Dublin.
In political science, the effective number of parties is a diversity index introduced by Laakso and Rein Taagepera (1979), which provides for an adjusted number of political parties in a country's party system, weighted by their relative size. The measure is especially useful when comparing party systems across countries.
Electoral reform is a change in electoral systems which alters how public desires are expressed in election results.
The Sainte-Laguë index (SLI) measures an election’s disproportionality, the adherence to the one person, one vote principle of equal representation. This index assumes if the fraction of voters matches the fraction of seats, then perfect proportionality is achieved.
The House of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform (ERRE) (French: Comité spécial sur la réforme électorale) was a special committee of the House of Commons of Canada established in 2016 during the 42nd Canadian Parliament to investigate reforms to the Canadian electoral system. The formation of "an all-party Parliamentary committee to review... [electoral] reforms" was an election promise by Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau in the 2015 federal election. After the Liberals won a majority in the election, and Trudeau became Prime Minister of Canada, he indicated the formation of a special committee was a priority in his mandate letter for Minister of Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef. Shortly after the committee submitted its report to Parliament on December 1, 2016, Monsef was transferred to the position of the Minister of Status of Women and Karina Gould took over the electoral reform file. Shortly after taking her position, Gould announced that the government would no longer be pursuing reform of the electoral system, stating "It has become evident that the broad support needed among Canadians for a change of this magnitude does not exist."
The Loosemore–Hanby index measures disproportionality of electoral systems, how much the principle of one person, one vote is violated. It computes the absolute difference between votes cast and seats obtained using the formula:
A mixed electoral system is one that uses different electoral systems to elect different seats in a legislature. Most often, this involves a winner-take-all component combined with a proportional component. The results of the combination may be mixed-member proportional (MMP), where the overall results of the elections are proportional, or mixed-member majoritarian, in which case the overall results are semi-proportional, retaining disproportionalities from the majoritarian component. Systems that use multiple types of combinations are sometimes called supermixed.
Apportionment in the Hellenic Parliament refers to those provisions of the Greek electoral law relating to the distribution of Greece's 300 parliamentary seats to the parliamentary constituencies, as well as to the method of seat allocation in Greek legislative elections for the various political parties. The electoral law was codified for the first time through a 2012 Presidential Decree. Articles 1, 2, and 3 deal with how the parliamentary seats are allocated to the various constituencies, while articles 99 and 100 legislate the method of parliamentary apportionment for political parties in an election. In both cases, Greece uses the largest remainder method.
General elections were held in Mauritius on 7 November 2019. The result was a victory for the Mauritian Alliance, a coalition of the Militant Socialist Movement (MSM), Muvman Liberater, Alan Ganoo Movement and Plateforme Militante, which won 42 of the 70 seats. Pravind Jugnauth of the MSM remained Prime Minister.
The 2005 Devon County Council election was an election to Devon County Council which took place on 5 May 2005 as part of the 2005 United Kingdom local elections. 62 councillors were elected from various electoral divisions, which returned either one or two county councillors each by first-past-the-post voting for a four-year term of office. The electoral divisions had been redrawn since the last election in 2001. No elections were held in Plymouth and Torbay, which are unitary authorities outside the area covered by the County Council.