OECD Better Life Index

Last updated

The OECD Better Life Index, created in May 2011 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, is an initiative pioneering the development of economic indicators which better capture multiple dimensions of economic and social progress. [1] [2]

Contents

The platform consists of a dashboard, that provides data and insights into key indicators - measuring areas such as wellbeing, environmental quality, quality of public services and security - alongside an interactive tool Your Better Life Index (BLI), [3] which encourages citizens to create their own indexes by ranking each of the indicators according to the importance in their lives.

The index and tool were created as part of the OECD Better Life Initiative. This initiative began in 2011 in line with the recommendations of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, also known as the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission, whose recommendations sought to address concerns that standard macroeconomic statistics like GDP failed to give a true account of people's current and future well-being. [4] The initiative's goals are to develop social and wellbeing indicators that can better reflect growth focusing on four key areas; environmental sustainability, increased wellbeing, falling inequality, and systems resilience. The 'beyond growth' approach to economic progress is relatively new and the OECD Better Life Initiative promotes the co-production of what we might standardise by facilitating conversation between the public and policymakers.

Users can create their own economic index by ranking 11 areas of socio-economic progress by what is important to them. This generates a ranking so users can see how their country compares. Users are encouraged to share their indicators with others on the platform to view the latter's and discuss similarities and differences.

Users can also choose to share their data with OECD and will then be asked to provide more demographic data about their situation. The OECD Better Life Initiative then analyses all users input data and reports the findings in a bi-annual report named How's Life? Well-being. The data used in the report consists of 80+ indicators including measures on inequality and further socio-economic indicators. The findings reflect what is important to citizens, and how their current socio-economic situations reflect in the areas of governance that they prioritise. These insights are then used to guide governments to put well-being at the centre of their policymaking by shedding light on what well-being means to their citizens. [5] In this way, by using the tool, citizens can shape public policy.

Methodology and calculation

First published on 24 May 2011, the index consists of 11 topics of well-being. [6] Each of the 11 topics is made up of 1-4 indices and these are fine-tuned over time as insights are derived from data collected in previous years. [7]

Initially, each of the 11 topics are equally weighted to generate scores and ranks of 30+ countries by each area of well-being. The topics are given below:

  1. Housing: housing conditions and spendings (e.g. real estate pricing)
  2. Income: household income (after taxes and transfers) and net financial wealth
  3. Jobs: earnings, job security and unemployment
  4. Community: quality of social support network
  5. Education: education and what one gets out of it
  6. Environment: quality of environment (e.g. environmental health)
  7. Governance: involvement in democracy
  8. Health
  9. Life Satisfaction: level of happiness
  10. Safety: murder and assault rates
  11. Work–life balance

The official definitions for the topics and the indices which make them up are stated in the OECD Better Life Index definitions

Users create their own economic indexes by scoring each of the 11 topics from 0 to 5, where 0 reflects that this topic is not important to the user and 5 it is very important. The tool shows countries ranked in a chart where each of the nations is represented by a flower, and each of the topics is a petal, where its size is defined by its score in that area. The tool was designed by Berlin-based agency Raureif in collaboration with Moritz Stefaner and is very user-friendly.

The score that the user inputs for a topic is then used to calculate the weighting for that topic in the index. The weights are calculated using the formula which ensures the sum of weights totals 100%.

Each of the 11 topics consists of between 1-4 individual measures that make up that topic. The individual measures come in many units (percent, dollar, years etc.) and so to calculate the total score for that topic, the measures are normalised, resulting in a score χ between 0 and 1 per measure. If the indicator is something negative, for example, unemployment, then we take the score as 1-χ.

For each topic, the score are then added up and divided by the total number of measures used to make up that topic, this gives the total score for the topic. For example, a countries score for health would be calculated by: [8]

Current rankings

2020

The Better Life Index is not yet comparable over time as its methodology is still being fine-tuned. The OECD advises referring to the Hows Life - Well-being database for a view over time. The data shown below are the current rankings per country and topic for the year 2020.

Each topic is given a score calculated from the indices used to create the topic group, you can find the raw data on the OECD Better Life Index website [9]

The rankings given below are calculated giving an equal weighting of 1 to each well-being topic.

Current rankings in OECD Better Life Index (2020) Current rankings in OECD Better Life Index 2020.png
Current rankings in OECD Better Life Index (2020)

Legend:

  Explained by: Housing
  Explained by: Income
  Explained by: Jobs
  Explained by: Community
  Explained by: Education
  Explained by: Environment
  Explained by: Civic engagement
  Explained by: Health
  Explained by: Life Satisfaction
  Explained by: Safety
  Explained by: Work-Life Balance
Overall Rank
[10]
CountryHousingIncomeJobsCommunityEducationEnvironmentCivic engagementHealthLife SatisfactionSafetyWork-Life Balance
1Flag of Norway.svg  Norway
2Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia
3Flag of Iceland.svg  Iceland
4Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada
5Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark
6Flag of Switzerland (Pantone).svg  Switzerland
7Flag of Finland.svg  Finland
8Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands
9Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden
10Flag of the United States.svg  United States
11Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg
12Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand
13Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium
14Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom
15Flag of Germany.svg  Germany
16Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland
17Flag of Austria.svg  Austria
18Flag of France.svg  France
19Flag of Spain.svg  Spain
20Flag of Slovenia.svg  Slovenia
21Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia
22Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic
23Flag of Israel.svg  Israel
24Flag of Italy.svg  Italy
25Flag of Japan.svg  Japan
26Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia
27Flag of Poland.svg  Poland
28Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania
29Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal
30Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea
31Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary
32Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia
33Flag of Russia.svg  Russia
34Flag of Chile.svg  Chile
35Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil
36Flag of Greece.svg  Greece
37Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey
38Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia
39Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico
40Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa

Findings

The fourth edition of How's Life was released in 2020; all reports can be viewed online using the OECD Library. Below is a summary of the most recent findings.

General

Inequalities

The report highlights differences in gender, age, education and between the top and bottom performers of well-being outcomes. Income inequality has barely changed since 2010 and those in the top 20% earn 6 times more than those in the bottom 20%. Women have more social connections and earn 13% less than men whilst also working half an hour more on both paid and unpaid work per day.

Higher levels of wellbeing are seen in those countries having higher levels of equality [11]

Reception

From an econometric point of view, the Index seems similar to other efforts aimed at substituting or complementing the gross domestic product (GDP) measure by an econometric model for measuring the happiness and well-being of the population. One major criticism is that the Better Life Index uses a limited subset of indicators used by other econometric models such as Gross National Well-being Index 2005, Sustainable Society Index of 2008, [12] and Bhutan Gross National Happiness Index of 2012, and Social Progress Index of 2013. Observers argue that "the 11 dimensions still cannot fully capture what is truly important to a populace, such as social networks that sustain relationships, and freedom of speech.". [13] Various critics have pointed out that the OECD's BLI does not include such dimensions as poverty, economic inequality, access to health insurance and healthcare, environmental and air pollution.[ citation needed ]

In 2012 OECD relaunched "with new indicators on inequality and gender plus rankings for Brazil and Russia. Some indicators have been removed or updated, Governance has been renamed civic engagement, the employment rate of women with children has been replaced by the full integration of gender information in the employment data and students' cognitive skills (e.g. student skills in reading, math and sciences) has replaced students' reading skills to have a broader view." [14] Some argue that some of the criteria are vague and question the purpose of such measures, it is questioned "what really constitutes "environmental quality"? Can it result in a population control policy to minimize damage to the environment? While others argue that the Better Life Index unlike the Gross National Happiness Index does not pay attention to religion. Critics also state that the Better Life Index ignores good family life or moral formation.[ citation needed ] Others have criticized its methodology such as the use of relative scores instead of absolute ones. [15]

The insights provided by user inputs into the platform have been praised to effectively depict collective citizen definitions of well-being. [16] The initiative and index has gone some way to moving the public debate, though the platform is not well advertised and does not appear in the top results of web searches for similar tools [17]

As increases in inequality and climate change force us to reconsider our ideas of growth and progress the OECD Better Life Index may become more mainstream.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gross domestic product</span> Market value of goods and services produced within a country

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a monetary measure of the market value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time period by a country or countries. GDP is most often used by the government of a single country to measure its economic health. Due to its complex and subjective nature, this measure is often revised before being considered a reliable indicator.

Quality of life (QOL) is defined by the World Health Organization as "an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Development Index</span> Composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and income indices

The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistical composite index of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, which is used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. A country scores a higher level of HDI when the lifespan is higher, the education level is higher, and the gross national income GNI (PPP) per capita is higher. It was developed by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq and was further used to measure a country's development by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)'s Human Development Report Office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genuine progress indicator</span> Enhances Economic / Well-Being indicators

Genuine progress indicator (GPI) is a metric that has been suggested to replace, or supplement, gross domestic product (GDP). The GPI is designed to take fuller account of the well-being of a nation, only a part of which pertains to the size of the nation's economy, by incorporating environmental and social factors which are not measured by GDP. For instance, some models of GPI decrease in value when the poverty rate increases. The GPI separates the concept of societal progress from economic growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare</span> Economic indicator

The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) is an economic indicator intended to replace the gross domestic product (GDP), which is the main macroeconomic indicator of System of National Accounts (SNA). Rather than simply adding together all expenditures like the GDP, consumer spending is balanced by such factors as income distribution and cost associated with pollution and other unsustainable costs. The calculation excludes defence expenditures and considers a wider range of harmful effects of economic growth. It is similar to the genuine progress indicator (GPI).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gross National Happiness</span> Guiding philosophy of the government of Bhutan

Gross National Happiness, sometimes called Gross Domestic Happiness (GDH), is a philosophy that guides the government of Bhutan. It includes an index which is used to measure the collective happiness and well-being of a population. Gross National Happiness Index is instituted as the goal of the government of Bhutan in the Constitution of Bhutan, enacted on 18 July 2008.

The Human Poverty Index (HPI) was an indication of the poverty of community in a country, developed by the United Nations to complement the Human Development Index (HDI) and was first reported as part of the Human Development Report in 1997. It is developed by United Nations Development Program which also publishes indexes like HDI It was considered to better reflect the extent of deprivation in deprived countries compared to the HDI. In 2010, it was supplanted by the UN's Multidimensional Poverty Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Happy Planet Index</span> Index of human well-being and environmental impact

The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact that was introduced by the New Economics Foundation in 2006. Each country's HPI value is a function of its average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and ecological footprint per capita. The exact function is a little more complex, but conceptually it approximates multiplying life satisfaction and life expectancy and dividing that by the ecological footprint. The index is weighted to give progressively higher scores to nations with lower ecological footprints.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Human Development Report</span>

The National Human Development Reports (NHDR) take the Global Human Development Report approach to the national level and are prepared and owned by national teams. More than 540 national and sub-national HDRs have been produced so far by 135 countries, in addition to 31 regional reports.

The Gender Development Index (GDI) is an index designed to measure gender equality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Where-to-be-born Index</span> Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit

The where-to-be-born index was an index last published by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) in 2013, which aimed to measure which country would provide the best opportunities for a healthy, safe and prosperous life in the years after its publication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legatum Prosperity Index</span> Annual ranking of countries by Legatum

The Legatum Prosperity Index is an annual ranking developed by the Legatum Institute, an independent educational charity founded and part-funded by the private investment firm Legatum. The ranking is based on a variety of factors including wealth, economic growth, education, health, personal well-being, and quality of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender Parity Index</span> Socioeconomic index

Released by UNESCO, the Gender Parity Index (GPI) is a socioeconomic index usually designed to measure the relative access to education of males and females. It is used by international organizations, particularly in measuring the progress of developing countries. For example, some UNESCO documents consider gender parity in literacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative</span> UK economic research centre

The Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) is an economic research centre within the Oxford Department of International Development at the University of Oxford, England, that was established in 2007.

Wikiprogress is a defunct online platform for sharing information on the measurement of social, economic and environmental progress. It is thought to facilitate sharing on ideas, initiatives and knowledge on "measuring the progress of societies". Like Wikipedia, it was open to all members and communities for contribution – anyone interested in "progress" could register.

Although for many decades, it was customary to focus on GDP and other measures of national income, there has been growing interest in developing broad measures of economic well-being. National and international approaches include the Beyond GDP programme developed by the European Union, the Better Lives Compendium of Indicators developed by the OECD, as well as many alternative metrics of wellbeing or happiness. One of the earliest attempts to develop such an index at national level was Bhutan's Gross National Happiness Index and there are a now a number of similar projects ongoing around the world, including a project to develop for the UK an assessment of national well-being, commissioned by the Prime Minister David Cameron and led by the Office for National Statistics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social Progress Index</span>

The Social Progress Index (SPI) measures the extent to which countries provide for the social and environmental needs of their citizens. Fifty-four indicators in the areas of basic human needs, foundations of well-being, and opportunity to progress show the relative performance of nations. The index is published by the nonprofit Social Progress Imperative, and is based on the writings of Amartya Sen, Douglass North, and Joseph Stiglitz. The SPI measures the well-being of a society by observing social and environmental outcomes directly rather than the economic factors. The social and environmental factors include wellness, equality, inclusion, sustainability and personal freedom and safety.

International comparisons, or national evaluation indicators, focuses on the quantitative, qualitative, and evaluative analysis of one country in relation to others. Often, the objective is to compare one country's performance to others in order to assess what countries have achieved, what needs to change in order for them to perform better, or a country's progress in reaching certain objectives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Happiness Report</span> Publication ranking national happiness based on respondent ratings of their lives

The World Happiness Report is a report by the United Nations that measures national happiness. Data is primarily from the Gallup World Poll and based on respondent ratings of their own lives.

Med Jones is an American economist. He is the president of International Institute of Management, a U.S. based research organization. His work at the institute focuses on economic, investment, and business strategies.

References

  1. "Jersey's quality of life slips says survey". BBC News . 12 April 2022. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
  2. "The GDP Paradox~II". The Statesman. 21 July 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  3. "OECD Better Life Index" . Retrieved April 29, 2018.
  4. Gerhardt, Tina (20 June 2012). "Rio+20 Kicks Off". The Progressive .
  5. "Measuring well-being and progress" (PDF). OECD Better Life Initiative. OECD.
  6. Marber, Peter. "Brave New Math". World Policy Journal (Spring 2012).
  7. "OECD Better Life Index FAQ". OECD Better Life Index.
  8. "OECD Better Life Index FAQ". OECD Better Life Index.
  9. "OECD Better Life Index Raw Data 2020". OECD Better Life Index. OECD.
  10. "OECD better life index". www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  11. "How's Life? 2020 Report". OECD. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  12. "Data – All countries" . Retrieved April 29, 2018.
  13. "Susan Kistler on the OECD Better Life Index – AEA365".
  14. Rogers, Simon (May 22, 2012). "Better life: relaunching the happiness index". The Guadian . Guardian Media Group . Retrieved April 29, 2018.
  15. Kasparian, Jérôme; Rolland, Antoine (2012). "OECD's 'Better Life Index': Can any country be well ranked?". Journal of Applied Statistics. 39 (10): 2223–2230. doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.706265. S2CID   56123147.
  16. Koronakos, Gregory; Smirlis, Yiannis; Sotiros, Dimitris; Despotis, Dimitris (January 2019). "Assessment of OECD Better Life Index by incorporating public opinion". Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 70: 100699. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2019.03.005. S2CID   159351542 . Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  17. Carvalhosa Martins, Virginie (22 January 2018). "What Is a Better Life? OECD's Better Life Index Explores Quality of Life". OECD Forum.