Quadrisecant

Last updated

Three quadrisecants of a trefoil knot Trefoil quadrisecants.png
Three quadrisecants of a trefoil knot

In geometry, a quadrisecant or quadrisecant line of a space curve is a line that passes through four points of the curve. This is the largest possible number of intersections that a generic space curve can have with a line, and for such curves the quadrisecants form a discrete set of lines. Quadrisecants have been studied for curves of several types:

Contents

Definition and motivation

A quadrisecant is a line that intersects a curve, surface, or other set in four distinct points. It is analogous to a secant line, a line that intersects a curve or surface in two points; and a trisecant, a line that intersects a curve or surface in three points. [2]

Compared to secants and trisecants, quadrisecants are especially relevant for space curves, because they have the largest possible number of intersection points of a line with a generic curve. In the plane, a generic curve can be crossed arbitrarily many times by a line; for instance, small generic perturbations of the sine curve are crossed infinitely often by the horizontal axis. In contrast, if an arbitrary space curve is perturbed by a small distance to make it generic, there will be no lines through five or more points of the perturbed curve. Nevertheless, any quadrisecants of the original space curve will remain present nearby in its perturbation. [3] For generic space curves, the quadrisecants form a discrete set of lines. In contrast, when trisecants occur, they form continuous families of lines. [4]

One explanation for this phenomenon is visual: looking at a space curve from far away, the space of such points of view can be described as a two-dimensional sphere, one point corresponding to each direction. Pairs of strands of the curve may appear to cross from all of these points of view, or from a two-dimensional subset of them. Three strands will form a triple crossing when the point of view lies on a trisecant, and four strands will form a quadruple crossing from a point of view on a quadrisecant. Each constraint that the crossing of a pair of strands lies on another strand reduces the number of degrees of freedom by one (for a generic curve), so the points of view on trisecants form a one-dimensional (continuously infinite) subset of the sphere, while the points of view on quadrisecants form a zero-dimensional (discrete) subset. C. T. C. Wall writes that the fact that generic space curves are crossed at most four times by lines is "one of the simplest theorems of the kind", a model case for analogous theorems on higher-dimensional transversals. [3]

Depending on the properties of the curve, it may have no quadrisecants, finitely many, or infinitely many. These considerations make it of interest to determine conditions for the existence of quadrisecants, or to find bounds on their number in various special cases, such as knotted curves, [5] [6] algebraic curves, [7] or arrangements of lines. [8]

For special classes of curves

In three-dimensional Euclidean space, every nontrivial tame knot or link has a quadrisecant. Originally established in the case of knotted polygons and smooth knots by Erika Pannwitz, [5] this result was extended to knots in suitably general position and links with nonzero linking number, [6] and later to all nontrivial tame knots and links. [9]

Pannwitz proved more strongly that, for a locally flat disk having the knot as its boundary, the number of singularities of the disk can be used to construct a lower bound on the number of distinct quadrisecants. The existence of at least one quadrisecant follows from the fact that any such disk must have at least one singularity. [5] [10] Morton & Mond (1982) conjectured that the number of distinct quadrisecants of a given knot is always at least , where is the crossing number of the knot. [6] [10] Counterexamples to this conjecture have since been discovered. [10]

Two-component links have quadrisecants in which the points on the quadrisecant appear in alternating order between the two components, [6] and nontrivial knots have quadrisecants in which the four points, ordered cyclically as on the knot, appear in order along the quadrisecant. [11] The existence of these alternating quadrisecants can be used to derive the Fáry–Milnor theorem, a lower bound on the total curvature of a nontrivial knot. [11] Quadrisecants have also been used to find lower bounds on the ropelength of knots. [12]

G. T. Jin and H. S. Kim conjectured that, when a knotted curve has finitely many quadrisecants, can be approximated with an equivalent polygonal knot with its vertices at the points where the quadrisecants intersect , in the same order as they appear on . However, their conjecture is false: in fact, for every knot type, there is a realization for which this construction leads to a self-intersecting polygon, and another realization where this construction produces a knot of a different type. [13]

Unsolved problem in mathematics:

Does every wild knot have infinitely many quadrisecants?

It has been conjectured that every wild knot has an infinite number of quadrisecants. [9]

Algebraic curves

Arthur Cayley derived a formula for the number of quadrisecants of an algebraic curve in three-dimensional complex projective space, as a function of its degree and genus. [7] For a curve of degree and genus , the number of quadrisecants is [14]

This formula assumes that the given curve is non-singular; adjustments may be necessary if it has singular points. [15] [16]

Skew lines

The Schlafli double six Double six.svg
The Schläfli double six

In three-dimensional Euclidean space, every set of four skew lines in general position has either two quadrisecants (also in this context called transversals) or none. Any three of the four lines determine a hyperboloid, a doubly ruled surface in which one of the two sets of ruled lines contains the three given lines, and the other ruling consists of trisecants to the given lines. If the fourth of the given lines pierces this surface, it has two points of intersection, because the hyperboloid is defined by a quadratic equation. The two trisecants of the ruled surface, through these two points, form two quadrisecants of the given four lines. On the other hand, if the fourth line is disjoint from the hyperboloid, then there are no quadrisecants. [17] In spaces with complex number coordinates rather than real coordinates, four skew lines always have exactly two quadrisecants. [8]

The quadrisecants of sets of lines play an important role in the construction of the Schläfli double six, a configuration of twelve lines intersecting each other in 30 crossings. If five lines (for ) are given in three-dimensional space, such that all five are intersected by a common line but are otherwise in general position, then each of the five quadruples of the lines has a second quadrisecant , and the five lines formed in this way are all intersected by a common line . These twelve lines and the 30 intersection points form the double six. [18] [19]

An arrangement of complex lines with a given number of pairwise intersections and otherwise skew may be interpreted as an algebraic curve with degree and with genus determined from its number of intersections, and Cayley's aforementioned formula used to count its quadrisecants. The same result as this formula can also be obtained by classifying the quadruples of lines by their intersections, counting the number of quadrisecants for each type of quadruple, and summing over all quadruples of lines in the given set. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dimension</span> Property of a mathematical space

In physics and mathematics, the dimension of a mathematical space is informally defined as the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it. Thus, a line has a dimension of one (1D) because only one coordinate is needed to specify a point on it – for example, the point at 5 on a number line. A surface, such as the boundary of a cylinder or sphere, has a dimension of two (2D) because two coordinates are needed to specify a point on it – for example, both a latitude and longitude are required to locate a point on the surface of a sphere. A two-dimensional Euclidean space is a two-dimensional space on the plane. The inside of a cube, a cylinder or a sphere is three-dimensional (3D) because three coordinates are needed to locate a point within these spaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curve</span> Mathematical idealization of the trace left by a moving point

In mathematics, a curve is an object similar to a line, but that does not have to be straight.

Elliptic geometry is an example of a geometry in which Euclid's parallel postulate does not hold. Instead, as in spherical geometry, there are no parallel lines since any two lines must intersect. However, unlike in spherical geometry, two lines are usually assumed to intersect at a single point. Because of this, the elliptic geometry described in this article is sometimes referred to as single elliptic geometry whereas spherical geometry is sometimes referred to as double elliptic geometry.

In mathematics, projective geometry is the study of geometric properties that are invariant with respect to projective transformations. This means that, compared to elementary Euclidean geometry, projective geometry has a different setting, projective space, and a selective set of basic geometric concepts. The basic intuitions are that projective space has more points than Euclidean space, for a given dimension, and that geometric transformations are permitted that transform the extra points to Euclidean points, and vice versa.

In algebraic geometry and computational geometry, general position is a notion of genericity for a set of points, or other geometric objects. It means the general case situation, as opposed to some more special or coincidental cases that are possible, which is referred to as special position. Its precise meaning differs in different settings.

In mathematics, and especially in algebraic geometry, the intersection number generalizes the intuitive notion of counting the number of times two curves intersect to higher dimensions, multiple curves, and accounting properly for tangency. One needs a definition of intersection number in order to state results like Bézout's theorem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cubic surface</span>

In mathematics, a cubic surface is a surface in 3-dimensional space defined by one polynomial equation of degree 3. Cubic surfaces are fundamental examples in algebraic geometry. The theory is simplified by working in projective space rather than affine space, and so cubic surfaces are generally considered in projective 3-space . The theory also becomes more uniform by focusing on surfaces over the complex numbers rather than the real numbers; note that a complex surface has real dimension 4. A simple example is the Fermat cubic surface

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Borromean rings</span> Three linked but pairwise separated rings

In mathematics, the Borromean rings are three simple closed curves in three-dimensional space that are topologically linked and cannot be separated from each other, but that break apart into two unknotted and unlinked loops when any one of the three is cut or removed. Most commonly, these rings are drawn as three circles in the plane, in the pattern of a Venn diagram, alternatingly crossing over and under each other at the points where they cross. Other triples of curves are said to form the Borromean rings as long as they are topologically equivalent to the curves depicted in this drawing.

In algebraic geometry, the Kodaira dimensionκ(X) measures the size of the canonical model of a projective variety X.

In mathematics, Clifford's theorem on special divisors is a result of William K. Clifford (1878) on algebraic curves, showing the constraints on special linear systems on a curve C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three-dimensional space</span> Geometric model of the physical space

In geometry, a three-dimensional space is a mathematical space in which three values (coordinates) are required to determine the position of a point. Most commonly, it is the three-dimensional Euclidean space, that is, the Euclidean space of dimension three, which models physical space. More general three-dimensional spaces are called 3-manifolds. The term may also refer colloquially to a subset of space, a three-dimensional region, a solid figure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayley–Bacharach theorem</span> Statement about cubic curves in the projective plane

In mathematics, the Cayley–Bacharach theorem is a statement about cubic curves in the projective plane P2. The original form states:

In mathematics, enumerative geometry is the branch of algebraic geometry concerned with counting numbers of solutions to geometric questions, mainly by means of intersection theory.

In mathematics, intersection theory is one of the main branches of algebraic geometry, where it gives information about the intersection of two subvarieties of a given variety. The theory for varieties is older, with roots in Bézout's theorem on curves and elimination theory. On the other hand, the topological theory more quickly reached a definitive form.

In algebraic geometry, a line bundle on a projective variety is nef if it has nonnegative degree on every curve in the variety. The classes of nef line bundles are described by a convex cone, and the possible contractions of the variety correspond to certain faces of the nef cone. In view of the correspondence between line bundles and divisors, there is an equivalent notion of a nef divisor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immersion (mathematics)</span> Differentiable function whose derivative is everywhere injective

In mathematics, an immersion is a differentiable function between differentiable manifolds whose differential pushforward is everywhere injective. Explicitly, f : MN is an immersion if

In Euclidean and projective geometry, five points determine a conic, just as two (distinct) points determine a line. There are additional subtleties for conics that do not exist for lines, and thus the statement and its proof for conics are both more technical than for lines.

In algebraic geometry, the Witten conjecture is a conjecture about intersection numbers of stable classes on the moduli space of curves, introduced by Edward Witten in the paper Witten (1991), and generalized in Witten (1993). Witten's original conjecture was proved by Maxim Kontsevich in the paper Kontsevich (1992).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Schläfli double six</span>

In geometry, the Schläfli double six is a configuration of 30 points and 12 lines in three-dimensional Euclidean space, introduced by Ludwig Schläfli in 1858. The lines of the configuration can be partitioned into two subsets of six lines: each line is disjoint from (skew with) the lines in its own subset of six lines, and intersects all but one of the lines in the other subset of six lines. Each of the 12 lines of the configuration contains five intersection points, and each of these 30 intersection points belongs to exactly two lines, one from each subset, so in the notation of configurations the Schläfli double six is written 302125.

The terminology of algebraic geometry changed drastically during the twentieth century, with the introduction of the general methods, initiated by David Hilbert and the Italian school of algebraic geometry in the beginning of the century, and later formalized by André Weil, Jean-Pierre Serre and Alexander Grothendieck. Much of the classical terminology, mainly based on case study, was simply abandoned, with the result that books and papers written before this time can be hard to read. This article lists some of this classical terminology, and describes some of the changes in conventions.

References

  1. Jin, Gyo Taek (December 2017), "Polygonal approximation of unknots by quadrisecants", in Reiter, Philipp; Blatt, Simon; Schikorra, Armin (eds.), New Directions in Geometric and Applied Knot Theory, De Gruyter Open, pp. 159–175, doi: 10.1515/9783110571493-008
  2. Eisenbud, David; Harris, Joe (2016), 3264 and All That: A second course in algebraic geometry, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 377, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139062046, ISBN   978-1-107-60272-4, MR   3617981
  3. 1 2 Wall, C. T. C. (1977), "Geometric properties of generic differentiable manifolds", in Palis, Jacob; do Carmo, Manfredo (eds.), Geometry and Topology: Proceedings of the Latin American School of Mathematics (ELAM III) held at the Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (IMPA), Rio de Janeiro, July 1976, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 597, pp. 707–774, doi:10.1007/BFb0085382, MR   0494233
  4. Denne, Elizabeth (2018), "Quadrisecants and essential secants of knots", in Blatt, Simon; Reiter, Philipp; Schikorra, Armin (eds.), New directions in geometric and applied knot theory, Partial Differential Equations and Measure Theory, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 138–158, doi: 10.1515/9783110571493-006 , MR   3915943, S2CID   128222971
  5. 1 2 3 Pannwitz, Erika (1933), "Eine elementargeometrische Eigenschaft von Verschlingungen und Knoten", Mathematische Annalen , 108 (1): 629–672, doi:10.1007/BF01452857, S2CID   123026724
  6. 1 2 3 4 Morton, Hugh R.; Mond, David M. Q. (1982), "Closed curves with no quadrisecants", Topology , 21 (3): 235–243, doi: 10.1016/0040-9383(82)90007-6 , MR   0649756
  7. 1 2 Cayley, Arthur (1863), Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , vol. 153, The Royal Society, pp. 453–483, JSTOR   108806
  8. 1 2 3 Wong, B. C. (1934), "Enumerative properties of -space curves", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 40 (4): 291–296, doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1934-05854-3 , MR   1562839
  9. 1 2 Kuperberg, Greg (1994), "Quadrisecants of knots and links", Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications , 3: 41–50, arXiv: math/9712205 , doi:10.1142/S021821659400006X, MR   1265452, S2CID   6103528
  10. 1 2 3 Jin, Gyo Taek (2005), "Quadrisecants of knots with small crossing number", Physical and numerical models in knot theory (PDF), Ser. Knots Everything, vol. 36, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 507–523, doi:10.1142/9789812703460_0025, MR   2197955
  11. 1 2 Denne, Elizabeth Jane (2004), Alternating quadrisecants of knots, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, arXiv: math/0510561 , Bibcode:2005math.....10561D
  12. Denne, Elizabeth; Diao, Yuanan; Sullivan, John M. (2006), "Quadrisecants give new lower bounds for the ropelength of a knot", Geometry & Topology , 10: 1–26, arXiv: math/0408026 , doi:10.2140/gt.2006.10.1, MR   2207788, S2CID   5770206
  13. Bai, Sheng; Wang, Chao; Wang, Jiajun (2018), "Counterexamples to the quadrisecant approximation conjecture", Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications, 27 (2), 1850022, arXiv: 1605.00538 , doi:10.1142/S0218216518500220, MR   3770471, S2CID   119601013
  14. Griffiths, Phillip; Harris, Joseph (2011), Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley Classics Library, vol. 52, John Wiley & Sons, p. 296, ISBN   9781118030776
  15. Welchman, W. G. (April 1932), "Note on the trisecants and quadrisecants of a space curve", Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 28 (2): 206–208, doi:10.1017/s0305004100010872, S2CID   120725025
  16. Maxwell, Edwin A. (July 1935), "Note on the formula for the number of quadrisecants of a curve in space of three dimensions", Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31 (3): 324–326, doi:10.1017/s0305004100013086, S2CID   122279811
  17. Hilbert, David; Cohn-Vossen, Stephan (1952), Geometry and the Imagination (2nd ed.), New York: Chelsea, p. 164, ISBN   978-0-8284-1087-8
  18. Schläfli, Ludwig (1858), Cayley, Arthur (ed.), "An attempt to determine the twenty-seven lines upon a surface of the third order, and to derive such surfaces in species, in reference to the reality of the lines upon the surface", Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2: 55–65, 110–120
  19. Coxeter, H. S. M. (2006), "An absolute property of four mutually tangent circles", Non-Euclidean geometries, Math. Appl. (N. Y.), vol. 581, New York: Springer, pp. 109–114, doi:10.1007/0-387-29555-0_5, MR   2191243 ; Coxeter repeats Schläfli's construction, and provides several references to simplified proofs of its correctness