The Honourable Justice Roslyn Atkinson | |
---|---|
Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland | |
In office 3 September 1998 –29 November 2018 | |
Appointed by | Major General Peter Arnison |
Personal details | |
Born | Roslyn Gay Atkinson 30 November 1948 Brisbane,Queensland,Australia |
Roslyn Gay Atkinson AO (born 30 November 1948 in Brisbane,Queensland) is a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland,who served for 20 years from 1998 until her retirement in 2018. In 2002 she also became the Chairperson of the Queensland Law Reform Commission,and served in that role until her retirement in 2013. [1] As well as being responsible for the Yankee Doodles precedent,Justice Atkinson has also made two notable decisions in her capacity as member of the Queensland Legal Practice Tribunal.
Justice Atkinson began her career as a teacher,from 1970 to 1974. She then became an actor and theatre administrator from 1974 to 1978, [2] before becoming a lecturer of literature,Drama,Film and Australian Studies at the Queensland Institute of Technology. In 1985 she entered the legal profession by becoming an articled clerk at Feez Ruthning (which later merged with what is now Allens). The following year she was an Associate to the Honourable Justice Brennan,then a Justice of the High Court of Australia. She was admitted to the bar in 1987 and practised there until her appointment to the Supreme Court. [3]
Justice Atkinson is perhaps most famous for her judgment in the case of Yankee Doodles v Blemvale Pty Ltd,an oft-quoted and highly influential case in Queensland which shaped the law relating to when courts will exercise their discretion whether to set aside default judgments against defendants. [4]
The plaintiff had obtained judgment for recovery of possession of land,mesne profits and costs,and the defendant had made application to have the judgment set aside.
After rejecting the defendant's argument that judgment had been irregularly entered,her Honour discussed the circumstances in which the court will set aside a regularly obtained default judgment,reiterating that the defendant providing a satisfactory explanation for the failure to appear and the length of delay for making the application are both factors that the court will consider. However,citing the Australian Capital Territory case of Sue Oclee Pty Ltd v Bak, [5] her Honour went on to emphasise the requirement for the defendant to have a prima facie defence on the merits:
- The decision whether or not to set aside a default judgment is discretionary. An affidavit in support of an application to set aside judgment entered into in default of appearance to a writ of summons must set out all the defences on which the defendant intends to rely and briefly set out the facts by which the defendant seeks to establish such defences. A mere statement by the defendant that he or she has a good defence is not sufficient to justify a review of the exercise of judicial discretion. The defendant must demonstrate "a very compelling reason" for the failure to appear and that it has a plausible defence either in law or in fact. Before allowing a defendant to come in and defend,the court should have before it material which enables it to say how it came about that the defendant found itself bound by a judgment regularly entered;that the defendant genuinely desires to be allowed to come in and present its case;and that issues are raised in such a form as to require serious consideration of the defence put forward. [6]
Observing that the defendant did not exhibit or tender any proposed defence to the action,Justice Atkinson concluded that it did "not appear to have a plausible defence such as would cause the court to exercise its discretion to set aside the default judgment". As a result,her Honour dismissed the defendant's application to set aside the default judgment.
The case of Legal Practice Tribunal v Tampoe [2009] QLPT 14 was before the Queensland Legal Practice Tribunal,then the main disciplinary body for legal practitioners in Queensland. Justice Atkinson was a member of that tribunal,and was the judge which heard the matter.
Tampoe,the respondent,a solicitor and principal of a law firm,had acted for convicted drug smuggler Schapelle Corby. It was in acting for her that Tampoe was accused of breaching client confidentiality,after he disclosed Corby's criminal history in a television interview published on 26 June 2005 on the Channel 9 program Sunday. He was also charged with bringing the legal profession into disrepute,after he also referred to Corby and her family in disparaging terms in a documentary to be shown on Australian television,and claimed that he had invented a defence for Corby alleging that baggage-handlers had planted the drugs,when this is not part of a defence lawyer's role. Tampoe accepted all of the allegations as particularised.
Justice Atkinson wrote that "the person who has behaved in the way particularised is not suitable to be a legal practitioner",before making an order recommending that Tampoe's name be removed from the roll of legal practitioners. [7]
As a result,Tampoe was removed from the roll,meaning that he is no longer eligible to practice as a solicitor or a barrister.
The case of Legal Services Commissioner v Dempsey [2009] QLPT 20 was a Discipline Application brought before the Tribunal against Townsville solicitor Paul Dempsey,who was charged with six counts of misconduct arising from his dealings with two different clients.
Dempsey acted for the first client in a matrimonial matter,and was accused of having failed to maintain proper standards of competence and diligence,misleading the client,drawing his client's funds from the trust account into his general account when he was not entitled to do so and misleading the Queensland Law Society. Dempsey acted for the second client in a personal injuries matter and was accused of over-charging,as well as preferring his own interests to that of his client.
Dempsey contested all six changes,however,the Tribunal accepted the evidence of the clients over Dempsey's,and in so doing found Dempsey guilty of four counts of professional misconduct and two counts of unsatisfactory professional conduct. The judgment was scathing of Dempsey. Discussing Dempsey's claim that he had a meeting with the matrimonial client,which was at odds with a letter he sent her and a diary note,Justice Atkinson remarked that:
- Mr Dempsey’s letter of 2 October 2006 is entirely inconsistent with the meeting’s having taken place. He said he believed he dictated that letter on the afternoon of 28 September. Not only does it not refer to a meeting which on Mr Dempsey’s version had occurred only hours earlier on the day it was dictated,it concludes with the words,“If you have got any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or come in and see me. I have been trying to get you in to discuss this with you,but we have been missing each other.”Given the difficulty this placed him in,he then posited that perhaps he drafted the letter before he saw her and signed a letter which said they had not seen each other without really reading it. This was an adventitious explanation. This contemporaneous document under Mr Dempsey’s hand reveals the truth. There was no such meeting and Mr Dempsey’s protestations in evidence that he clearly remembers such a meeting were false. His evidence reveals why he said there was a meeting when there was not…He could not possibly justify taking the $30,000 unless he had told her about it and she had agreed to it. [8]
Two months later,the Tribunal reconvened and made the finding that Dempsey had been dishonest and misleading when giving evidence to the Tribunal. The Tribunal then effectively terminated Dempsey's legal career when Justice Atkinson concluded that:
- The courts,fellow practitioners and clients cannot have confidence in a legal practitioner who has been untruthful on oath. A person who has been found guilty of the counts of professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct alleged in this matter and displayed such dishonesty on the disciplinary hearing is not a fit and proper person to be entrusted with the duties and responsibilities of a legal practitioner and the Tribunal recommends that his name be removed from the roll under s 456(2) of the 2007 Act. [9]
As a result,Dempsey was removed from the roll, [10] resulting in the end of his legal career.
The following year,Dempsey appealed the Tribunal's decision,but the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. [11] In 2011,Dempsey applied for special leave to appeal in the High Court of Australia. On 9 June 2011,Justices Gummow and Kiefel refused special leave,noting that "The application to this Court does not seek to advance any ground that would justify a grant of special leave to appeal and the applicant enjoys no prospect of success in this Court." [12]
In 2014,Atkinson presided over the trial of Brett Peter Cowan,who was found guilty of the murder of Daniel Morcombe. [2] Atkinson sentended Cowan to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 20 years. [13]
At the 2015 Australia Day Honours,Justice Atkinson was appointed an Officer of the Order of Australia for distinguished service to the judiciary and to law reform in Queensland,through contributions to the legal profession and to promoting awareness of issues of injustice and inequality in Australia and internationally. [14]
A barrister is a type of lawyer in common law jurisdictions. Barristers mostly specialise in courtroom advocacy and litigation. Their tasks include arguing cases in courts and tribunals,drafting legal pleadings,researching the law and giving legal opinions.
In law,a judgment,also spelled judgement,is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
A tribunal,generally,is any person or institution with authority to judge,adjudicate on,or determine claims or disputes—whether or not it is called a tribunal in its title. For example,an advocate who appears before a court with a single judge could describe that judge as "their tribunal." Many governmental bodies are titled "tribunals" to emphasize that they are not courts of normal jurisdiction. For example,the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a body specially constituted under international law;in Great Britain,employment tribunals are bodies set up to hear specific employment disputes. In many cases,the word tribunal implies a judicial body with a lesser degree of formality than a court,in which the normal rules of evidence and procedure may not apply,and whose presiding officers are frequently neither judges nor magistrates. Private judicial bodies are also often styled "tribunals." The word tribunal,however,is not conclusive of a body's function—for example,in Great Britain,the Employment Appeal Tribunal is a superior court of record.
A public defender is a lawyer appointed to represent people who otherwise cannot reasonably afford to hire a lawyer to defend themselves in a trial. Several countries provide people with public defenders,including the UK,Belgium,Hungary and Singapore,and some states of Australia. Brazil is the only country in which an office of government-paid lawyers with the specific purpose of providing full legal assistance and representation to the needy free of charge is established in the constitution. The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution,as interpreted by the Supreme Court,requires the US government to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases. Public defenders in the United States are lawyers employed by or under contract with county,state or federal governments.
William Montague Charles Gummow is a former Justice of the High Court of Australia,the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy. He was appointed to the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong on 8 April 2013 as a non-permanent judge from other common law jurisdictions.
Schapelle Leigh Corby is an Australian woman who was convicted of smuggling cannabis into Indonesia. She spent nine years imprisoned on the Indonesian island of Bali in Kerobokan Prison. Since her arrest Corby has publicly maintained that the drugs were planted in her bodyboard bag and that she did not know about them. Her trial and conviction were a major focus of attention for the Australian media.
The Supreme Court of Queensland is the highest court in the Australian State of Queensland. It was formerly the Brisbane Supreme Court,in the colony of Queensland.
Default judgment is a binding judgment in favor of either party based on some failure to take action by the other party. Most often,it is a judgment in favor of a plaintiff when the defendant has not responded to a summons or has failed to appear before a court of law. The failure to take action is the default. The default judgment is the relief requested in the party's original petition.
In England,the First-tier Tribunal,more commonly known as the Mental Health Tribunal,is an independent quasi-judicial body established to safeguard the rights of persons subject to the Mental Health Act 1983. It provides for consideration of appeals against the medical detention or forced treatment of a person who was deemed to be suffering from a mental disorder that was associated with a risk to the health or safety of that person or others.
A duty solicitor,duty counsel,or duty lawyer,is a solicitor whose services are available to a person either suspected of,or charged with,a criminal offence free of charge,if that person does not have access to a solicitor of their own and usually if it is judged by a means test that they cannot afford one. The system is operative in several Commonwealth countries,including the United Kingdom,Australia,New Zealand and Canada.
The District Court of Queensland(QDC) is the second tier in the court hierarchy of Queensland,Australia. The Court deals with serious criminal offences such as rape,armed robbery and fraud. Juries are used to decide if defendants are guilty or not guilty.
The Queensland Court of Disputed Returns is a court that adjudicates disputes concerning Queensland Government and local government elections and state referendums in Queensland,Australia. The Court is a division of the Supreme Court of Queensland.
John Harris Byrne is a retired Australian jurist who previously served as Senior Judge Administrator of the Supreme Court of Queensland. Having been a judge of that court since 1989,he was one of the court's most experienced judges. He was also Chair of the National Judicial College of Australia,a body which provides programs and professional development resources to judicial officers in Australia. He is now a private Commercial Arbitrator.
Justice Henry George Fryberg was a Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland,Australia.
Nudd v Taylor,was a court case,decided in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 30 August 2000. The case concerned Australian Private International Law,specifically giving a Queensland authority to the application of the Moçambique rule.
Civil procedure in South Africa is the formal rules and standards that courts follow in that country when adjudicating civil suits. The legal realm is divided broadly into substantive and procedural law. Substantive law is that law which defines the contents of rights and obligations between legal subjects;procedural law regulates how those rights and obligations are enforced. These rules govern how a lawsuit or case may be commenced,and what kind of service of process is required,along with the types of pleadings or statements of case,motions or applications,and orders allowed in civil cases,the timing and manner of depositions and discovery or disclosure,the conduct of trials,the process for judgment,various available remedies,and how the courts and clerks are to function.
In Australia,trust money in the legal industry is the money a law practice holds on behalf of a client or other people in the course of,or in connection with,the provision of legal services. Trust money is required to be held by a law firm on a client's behalf in a trust account with a bank and is highly regulated. A lawyer or law firm should not appropriate a client's trust money until certain regulations are met,which are different for each state in Australia. The Australian system regulating lawyers and their trust accounts has been labeled by the Rudd Government as an "unwieldy monster".
Jean Hazel Dalton is justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland in the Trial Division. She was appointed to the court in 2011.
The Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal (SSDT) is a specialist tribunal in Scotland with jurisdiction over serious disciplinary issues within the solicitor profession in Scotland.
Timothy Francis Carmody is an Australian judge who was the Chief Justice of Queensland between 8 July 2014 and 1 July 2015. His previous roles include work as a police officer,barrister,Queensland Crime Commissioner,Family Court of Australia judge,and Chief Magistrate of the Magistrates Court of Queensland. He also presided over the 2013 Child Protection Commission of Inquiry.