Screening Partnership Program

Last updated

The Screening Partnership Program (SPP), instituted in 2004 by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in the United States, is a program that allows airports to employ private security agencies to conduct screening, instead of having the TSA conduct said screenings. Airports and security agencies must complete applications in order to be eligible to participate in this program. All private security agencies must follow all TSA screening policies and procedures, and use TSA-approved equipment. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Participating airports

As of 2016, 23 airports have participated in the SPP. Below is a list of participating airports: [2] [5]

Airport nameLocationYear of approvalYear of withdrawal
Bert Mooney Airport near Butte, Montana 20142015 [6]
Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport near Bozeman, Montana20142015 [6]
Charles M. Schulz–Sonoma County Airport near Santa Rosa, California 2007
Dawson Community Airport Glendive, Montana2009
Glacier Park International Airport near Kalispell, Montana20142015 [6]
Greater Rochester International Airport near Rochester, New York 2005
Havre City-County Airport Havre, Montana2009
Jackson Hole Airport near Jackson, Wyoming 2005
Kansas City International Airport near Kansas City, Missouri 2005
Key West International Airport near Key West, Florida 2007
L. M. Clayton Airport near Wolf Point, Montana2009
Orlando Sanford International Airport Sanford, Florida2014
Portsmouth International Airport Portsmouth, New Hampshire 2014
Punta Gorda Airport near Punta Gorda, Florida2016
Roswell International Air Center near Roswell, New Mexico 2016
San Francisco International Airport near San Francisco, California2005
Sarasota–Bradenton International Airport near Sarasota and Bradenton, Florida 2014
Sidney–Richland Municipal Airport Sidney, Montana2009
Sioux Falls Regional Airport Sioux Falls, South Dakota 2005
Tupelo Regional Airport Tupelo, Mississippi 2005
Glasgow Valley County Airport Glasgow, Montana 2009
Yellowstone Airport West Yellowstone, Montana20142015 [6]

Qualified private agencies

Below is a list of qualified private agencies that are TSA-approved: [7]

Application process

Airports

  1. Airports that are interested in participating in the SPP first need to present an application to their local federal security director.
  2. Afterwards, it may then take up to 120 days to receive a status on the application. If the airport is approved, issuing of the contract may take up to 12 months. [2]
  3. If the contract is indeed issued, transition into the program may take from four to six months. [1]

Private screening agencies

To apply to the program as a private screening agency, the agency must first make sure there are available opportunities detailed on the Federal Business Opportunities website. Afterwards, the agency can proceed to apply. [2]

If contracted, these agencies will work for the TSA rather than the airport authority. [1]

Reception and concerns

Benefits of the SPP

Frequent flyers, airport executives, and lawmakers have argued that it will improve quality of service and make the screening process more efficient. [3] [8] Airport executives and lawmakers also say that private agencies can do some things that the TSA doesn't do (such being able to report an issue, get a response within minutes, and have it be remedied fast), making private agencies more desirable. [8] There are no financial or procedural differences. [9] Additionally, many high ranking aviation-security-affiliated individuals (such as T. J. Orr, aviation director for Charlotte Douglas International Airport and Mark VanLoh, director of the aviation department for Kansas City) believe that moving towards a private security/screening force is essential, and that they would prefer to be in charge of the security in their airports, to ensure accountability and constant quality of service. [8]

Lawmakers also say that they can't understand the TSA's resistance to the program, considering that it creates jobs. [4]

Supposed issues with the TSA

Several airports, such as Midway International Airport and O'Hare International Airport, have occasionally notified flyers that they should arrive around 3 hours before their flight, in case delays are to occur due to the supposed inefficiency of the TSA. [10] [5] Periodically, flyers have even missed their flights as a result of long lines for screening and other general delays, which has influenced people to want to switch to private screening agencies. [10] [11] [5]

Additionally, in 2015, the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspector general, John Roth, expressed concern with how "challenges [are] in almost every area of TSA’s operations ... failures in passenger and baggage screening operations, [were] discovered in part through our covert testing program". [12]

Issues with private screening agencies

An instance of cheating on screening tests occurred in 2006, where DHS officials found TSA agents cooperating with workers of Covenant Aviation Security in the San Francisco International Airport, in which the TSA gave the private security firm an early notice of upcoming inspections. Covenant Aviation Security went on to set off the screeners to make it seem as though they were properly inspecting luggage. All TSA officials, as well the security personnel from Covenant Aviation Security were disciplined, but none ended up losing their jobs. [13]

Issues with privatization

Much of the negative response to airport security privatization comes from within the TSA. Officials of the TSA have expressed the concern that airports simply want to rid themselves of the influence of the Federal Government. According to Representative John Mica, the TSA should act less like government personnel, and more like security personnel. [4]

Since the TSA has already laid out all the policies for how airport security in the United States should work, hired private agencies are required to follow these policies. This in turn narrows down the debate to quality and efficiency of customer service, rather than matters of security (as those are already addressed). [7]

Motivation and history

Below is a list of years during which airports were approved to participate in the SPP, as well as years of key congressional hearings associated with the SPP:

2004

The creation of the SPP was inspired and greatly motivated by Republican lawmakers (such as Rep. Richard Hudson and Rep. John L. Mica) to make the screening process more efficient, as well as the voices of frequent flyers and analysts. [14] [15] [8] Since its creation in 2004, the TSA has had at least 32 airports apply for the SPP. [7]

2005

Some of the first airports to apply and be approved in 2005 were the following: [7]

2007

Key West International Airport and Sonoma County Airport were approved for participating in the SPP in 2007. [7]

2009

In 2009, the following airports were approved to participate in the SPP: [7]

As of 2009, there were 13 airports participating in the SPP.

2012

In 2012, a congressional hearing entitled "Why is a job-creating, public-private partnership meeting resistance at the TSA?" [4] was held to examine the causes of the TSA's resistance to the SPP. [16]

According to the opening statement of Representative Mike Rogers (a supporter of the SPP), the TSA should work to "strengthen and improve the private screening program and make it more cost-efficient so that U.S. businesses can take on a more meaningful role". [17]

John S. Pistole, then the Administrator of the TSA, responded by saying that in 2010 (or 2011?) he "directed a full review of TSA policies", that the SPP was only one of the programs that was reviewed, that he "did not see any clear and substantial advantage to expanding the program", and that he is "open to approving new applications where a clear and substantial benefit could be realized". He also noted that a Federal workforce allows for more "flexibility". [4]

2014

In 2014, the following airports were approved to participate in the SPP: [7]

As of 2014, there were 21 airports participating in the SPP.

There was a congressional hearing on July 29, 2014, which was focused on the topic of "Examing TSA's management of the Screening Partnership Program". [18]

According to the opening statement of Representative Richard Hudson, lawmakers and stakeholders believe that "the private sector is highly capable of providing efficient and effective screening services. Unfortunately, TSA’s actions over the last few years seem to demonstrate that it does not share this goal". [19]

2015

In 2015, there was a congressional hearing on November 17, 2015, which was focused on the topic of how "Improved cost estimates can enhance program decision making". [20]

According to a testimony from Congressman John Katko, the TSA's "cost estimating practices and methodology developed in 2013 compared against best practices, TSA’s cost estimates have some strengths, but also have limitations in four general characteristics that best practices call for in a high-quality and reliable cost estimate" [20] and that these "limitations in each of the four characteristics of a high quality cost estimate prevent TSA’s estimates from being reliable". [20]

2016

In 2016, the following airport(s) were approved to participate in the SPP. [5]

As of 2016, there are 20 airports participating in the SPP. [5]

There have not yet been any key congressional hearings associated with the SPP.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transportation Security Administration</span> United States federal government agency

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that has authority over the security of transportation systems within, and connecting to the United States. It was created as a response to the September 11 attacks to improve airport security procedures and consolidate air travel security under a dedicated federal administrative law enforcement agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airport security</span> Measures to prevent crime at an airport

Airport security includes the techniques and methods used in an attempt to protect passengers, staff, aircraft, and airport property from malicious harm, crime, terrorism, and other threats.

The Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS) is a counter-terrorism system in place in the United States air travel industry that matches passenger information with other data sources. The United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA) maintains a watchlist, pursuant to 49 USC § 114 (h)(2), of "individuals known to pose, or suspected of posing, a risk of air piracy or terrorism or a threat to airline or passenger safety." The list is used to pre-emptively identify terrorists attempting to buy airline tickets or board aircraft traveling in the United States, and to mitigate perceived threats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Registered Traveler</span>

A registered traveler is a person qualified through an airline passenger security assessment system in the United States air travel industry. Such programs were initially tested in 2005. Registered traveler programs are currently in operation in various airports around the country, and are administered by TTAC, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) office responsible for Secure Flight, the replacement for the Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS) and the canceled CAPPS II counter-terrorism system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Air Marshal Service</span> United States federal law enforcement agency

The Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS) is a United States federal law enforcement agency under the supervision of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Security theater is the practice of implementing security measures that are considered to provide the feeling of improved security while doing little or nothing to achieve it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sunwing Airlines</span> Ultra low-cost airline of Canada (2005)

Sunwing Airlines Inc. is a Canadian low-cost airline headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. On May 1, 2023, WestJet announced that it had completed the acquisition of Sunwing Airlines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NEXUS</span> Trusted Traveler Program

NEXUS is a joint Canada Border Services Agency and U.S. Customs and Border Protection-operated Trusted Traveler and expedited border control program designed for pre-approved, low-risk travelers. Members of the program can avoid waits at border entry points by using reserved lanes at land crossings into Canada and the United States, by using self-serve kiosks at airports in Canada, the US and some international locations, or by phoning border officials for a marine entry. A NEXUS membership card is a valid document under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), so it can be used in place of a passport, including by air if flying between the US and Canada. However, carrying a valid passport is still recommended, in the rare event that a flight is diverted to an airport without NEXUS support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sensitive security information</span>

Sensitive security information or SSI is a term used in the United States to denote sensitive but unclassified information obtained or developed in the conduct of security activities, the public disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy, reveal trade secrets or privileged or confidential information, or be detrimental to the security of transportation. It is not a form of classification under Executive Order 12958 as amended. SSI is not a security classification for national security information. The safeguarding and sharing of SSI is governed by Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 15 and 1520. This designation is assigned to information to limit the exposure of the information to only those individuals that "need to know" in order to participate in or oversee the protection of the nation's transportation system. Those with a need to know can include persons outside of TSA, such as airport operators, aircraft operators, railroad carriers, rail hazardous materials shippers and receivers, vessel and maritime port owners and operators, foreign vessel owners, and other persons.

The concept of border security in the United States shares a complex relationship with the persistent threat of terrorism. Border security includes the protection of land borders, ports, and airports. The relationship is unique in the sense that the federal government must constantly reevaluate and tweak its border security policy to address the perceived threats posed to the United States through the form of human terrorism or the smuggling and detonation of a weapon of mass destruction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Covenant Aviation Security</span> US aviationsecurity services company

Covenant Aviation Security, LLC (CAS) is a Chicago company that provides security services to the aviation industry. Michael Bolles has been its President since July 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response team</span>

A Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response team, sometimes Visible Intermodal Protection and Response (VIPR) is a Transportation Security Administration program. Various government sources have differing descriptions of VIPR's exact mission. It is specifically authorized by 6 U.S.C. § 1112 which says that the program is to "augment the security of any mode of transportation at any location within the United States". Authority for the program is under the Secretary of Homeland Security. The program falls under TSA's Office of Law Enforcement/Federal Air Marshal Service. TSA OLE/FAMS shares responsibility for the program with the Office of Security Operations and Transportation Sector Network Management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TSA Loose Change Act</span>

The TSA Loose Change Act was a bill intended to require the Transportation Security Administration to give the money left behind by passengers at TSA checkpoints to private charities that provide travel-related services to the members of the U.S. military and their families. The bill passed the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress, but it died in committee in the Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act of 2013</span>

The Aviation Security Stakeholder Participation Act of 2013 is a bill that would force the Transportation Security Administration to consult with a new Aviation Security Advisory Committee about security policies. The bill passed in the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Honor Flight Act</span>

The Honor Flight Act is a bill that would direct the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to establish a process for providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling on an Honor Flight to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor their service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerardo Hernandez Airport Security Act of 2014</span>

The Gerardo Hernandez Airport Security Act of 2014 is a bill that would direct the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to undertake a variety of activities aimed at enhancing security at airports where the TSA performs or oversees security-related activities. The bill would require the TSA to verify that all such airports have appropriate response plans, to share best practices with each airport, as well as to report to Congress on the capacity of law enforcement, fire and medical response teams to communicate and respond to security threats at airports.

Clear Secure, Inc. is an American technology company that operates biometric travel document verification systems at some major airports and stadiums.

BDA, until 2016 called SPOT, is a program launched in the United States by the Transportation Security Administration to identify potential terrorists among people at an airport by a set of 94 objective criteria, all of which are signs for either stress, fear, or deception. Passengers meeting enough of the criteria are, under the program, referred for a patdown and additional screening. The criteria were initially secret, but in March 2015, The Intercept published them after obtaining the information from an anonymous source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Douglas Hofsass</span>

Douglas Hofsass is a former Assistant Administrator in the United States Department of Homeland Security, assigned to the Transportation Security Administration. In addition to his role as the Assistant Administrator overseeing risk based security and trusted traveler programs, he also served as the Federal Security Director in New York City. As part of his responsibilities in New York City, he oversaw the first implementation of federal security operations under DHS at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport and the East 34th Street Heliport for commercial helicopter flights to John F Kennedy International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport and LaGuardia Airport. Hofsass also held the posts of General Manager of Commercial Aviation and Deputy Assistant Administrator for Policy and Industry Engagement for the Transportation Security Administration. He was heavily involved in launching the TSA Pre-Check Program, and claimed a collaborative partnership with the US Customs Department and their Global Entry Program. Hofsass served at the Transportation Security Administration from 2002 until 2013, including several years working directly for Administrators John S. Pistole, Kip Hawley and Gale Rossides. Prior to his Federal executive service, Hofsass was with United Airlines management for nearly 10 years. Hofsass returned to the commercial aviation sector in 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Huban A. Gowadia</span>

Huban A. Gowadia is principal associate director of Global Security at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) since February 2020. Gowadia joined the Lab in May 2018 as the deputy principal associate director for Programs for the National Ignition Facility and Photon Science (NIF&PS) principal directorate. She worked with the NIF&PS Department of Defense Technologies program to engage industry and federal sponsors to form partnerships to address some of the nation’s most pressing security issues. She also supported the development of cross-disciplinary initiatives within LLNL that can utilize NIF&PS technologies to enhance mission space in other directorates.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Screening Partnership Program Factsheet" (PDF). TSA. TSA. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Screening Partnership Program". TSA. TSA. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  3. 1 2 Hienz, Justin. "Theater of the Absurd – TSA and the Screening Partnership Program". Security Debrief. Security Debrief. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "- SCREENING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM: WHY IS A JOB-CREATING, PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP MEETING RESISTANCE AT TSA?". www.gpo.gov. Retrieved 2016-06-29.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Lee, Jessica (2016-05-19). "Sea-Tac Airport to hire 90 contractors to help shrink security lines". The Seattle Times. The Seattle Times Company. Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Kendall, Lewis (October 4, 2015). "Bozeman airport ends contract with private security firms". Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Retrieved 2016-06-30.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gillette, Spencer; Russell, Joel; Perkins, Penny. "Options to TSA Security: Is Private Security Screening Right for Your Airport?" (PDF). Steven Baldwin Associates. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Stellin, Susan. "Gatekeepers Under Scrutiny". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  9. ↑ Baskas, Harriet. "Airports toy with the idea of tossing the TSA". NBCNews. NBCNews. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  10. 1 2 Vasel, Kathryn. "Flying out of Chicago? Arrive 3 hours before your flight". CNN Money. CNN. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  11. ↑ Kurhi, Eric. "Expected long airport waits may dampen summer getaways". The Mercury News. Digital First Media. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  12. ↑ "STATEMENT OF JOHN ROTH INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCERNING TSA: Security Gaps" (PDF). United States Department of Homeland Security. 3 November 2015. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
  13. ↑ "SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT / Screening tests were sabotaged / Security workers were warned when undercover agent arrived" . Retrieved 2016-06-30.
  14. ↑ Laing, Keith. "Lawmakers spar with TSA union over private airport security". The Hill. Capitol Hill Publishing Corp. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  15. ↑ Ahlers, Mike. "TSA shuts door on private airport screening program". CNN. CNN. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  16. ↑ "RESCHEDULED: Subcommittee Hearing: Screening Partnership Program: Why is a Job-Creating, Public-Private Partnership Meeting Resistance at TSA?". House Committee on Homeland Security. February 16, 2012. Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  17. ↑ "Statement of Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL) Subcommittee on Transportation Security" (PDF). Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  18. ↑ "SUBCOMMITTEE HEARING: EXAMINING TSA'S MANAGEMENT OF THE SCREENING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM". Homeland Security Committee. Homeland Security Committee. 29 July 2014. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
  19. ↑ "Examining TSA's Management of the Screening Partnership Program" (PDF). 29 July 2014. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
  20. 1 2 3 "SCREENING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM: Improved Cost Estimates Can Enhance Program Decision Making" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. United States Government Accountability Office. 17 November 2015. Retrieved 29 June 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.