Singapore math

Last updated

Singapore math (or Singapore maths in British English [1] ) is a teaching method based on the national mathematics curriculum used for first through sixth grade in Singaporean schools. [2] [3] The term was coined in the United States [4] to describe an approach originally developed in Singapore to teach students to learn and master fewer mathematical concepts at greater detail as well as having them learn these concepts using a three-step learning process: concrete, pictorial, and abstract. [2] [3] In the concrete step, students engage in hands-on learning experiences using physical objects which can be everyday items such as paper clips, toy blocks or math manipulates such as counting bears, link cubes and fraction discs. [5] This is followed by drawing pictorial representations of mathematical concepts. Students then solve mathematical problems in an abstract way by using numbers and symbols. [6]

Contents

The development of Singapore math began in the 1980s when Singapore's Ministry of Education developed its own mathematics textbooks that focused on problem solving and developing thinking skills. [3] [7] Outside Singapore, these textbooks were adopted by several schools in the United States and in other countries such as Canada, Israel, the Netherlands, the Philippines and the United Kingdom. [1] [8] [9] [10] Early adopters of these textbooks in the U.S. included parents interested in homeschooling as well as a limited number of schools. [3] These textbooks became more popular since the release of scores from international education surveys such as Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which showed Singapore at the top three of the world since 1995. [11] [12] U.S. editions of these textbooks have since been adopted by a large number of school districts as well as charter and private schools. [3]

History

Before the development of its own mathematics textbooks in the 1980s, Singapore imported its mathematics textbooks from other countries. [13] In 1981, the Curriculum Development Institute of Singapore (CDIS) (currently the Curriculum Planning and Development Division) began to develop its own mathematics textbooks and curriculum. The CDIS developed and distributed a textbook series for elementary schools in Singapore called Primary Mathematics, which was first published in 1982 and subsequently revised in 1992 to emphasize problem solving. [14] [15] In the late 1990s, the country's Ministry of Education opened the elementary school textbook market to private companies, and Marshall Cavendish, a local and private publisher of educational materials, began to publish and market the Primary Mathematics textbooks. [1] [15] [16]

Following Singapore's curricular and instructional initiatives, dramatic improvements in math proficiency among Singaporean students on international assessments were observed. [1] TIMSS, an international assessment for math and science among fourth and eighth graders, ranked Singapore's fourth and eighth grade students first in mathematics four times (1995, 1999, 2003, and 2015) among participating nations. [11] [14] [12] Likewise, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)'s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a worldwide study of 15-year-old school students' scholastic performance in mathematics, science, and reading, has ranked Singaporean students first in 2015, [17] and second after Shanghai, China in 2009 and 2012. [18] [19]

Since the TIMSS publication of Singapore's high ranking in mathematics, professional mathematicians in the U.S. took a closer look at Singapore mathematics textbooks such as Primary Mathematics. [11] The term Singapore math was originally coined in the U.S. to describe the teaching approach based on these textbooks. [4] In 2005, the American Institutes for Research (AIR) published a study, which concluded that U.S. schools could benefit from adopting these textbooks. [11] The textbooks were already distributed in the U.S. by Singapore Math, Inc., a private venture based in Oregon. [14] Early users of these textbooks in the U.S. included parents interested in homeschooling as well as a limited number of schools. [3] They became more popular since the release of the TIMSS scores showing Singapore's top ranking. [11] As of 2004, U.S. versions of Singapore mathematics textbooks were adopted in over 200 U.S. schools. [3] [8] Schools and counties that had adopted these textbooks reported improvements in their students' performance. [8] [11] [16] [20] Singapore math textbooks were also used in schools from other countries such as Canada, Israel, and the United Kingdom. [1] [8] [9]

Features

Covers fewer topics in greater depth

Compared to a traditional U.S. math curriculum, Singapore math focuses on fewer topics but covers them in greater detail. [3] Each semester-level Singapore math textbook builds upon prior knowledge and skills, with students mastering them before moving on to the next grade. Students, therefore, need not re-learn these skills at the next grade level. [2] By the end of sixth grade, Singapore math students have mastered multiplication and division of fractions and can solve difficult multi-step word problems. [21]

In the U.S., it was found that Singapore math emphasizes the essential math skills recommended in the 2006 Focal Points publication by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), the 2008 final report by the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, and the proposed Common Core State Standards, though it generally progresses to topics at an earlier grade level compared to U.S. standards. [22] [23]

Three-step learning process

A bar model used to solve an addition problem. This pictorial approach is typically used as a problem-solving tool in Singapore math. Whole-part model addition 70 plus 30.jpg
A bar model used to solve an addition problem. This pictorial approach is typically used as a problem-solving tool in Singapore math.

Singapore math teaches students mathematical concepts in a three-step learning process: concrete, pictorial, and abstract. [3] This learning process was based on the work of an American psychologist, Jerome Bruner. In the 1960s, Bruner found that people learn in three stages by first handling real objects before transitioning to pictures and then to symbols. [24] The Singapore government later adapted this approach to their math curriculum in the 1980s.

The first of the three steps is concrete, wherein students learn while handling objects such as chips, dice, or paper clips. [5] Students learn to count these objects (e.g., paper clips) by physically lining them up in a row. They then learn basic arithmetic operations such as addition or subtraction by physically adding or removing the objects from each row. [24]

Students then transition to the pictorial step by drawing diagrams called "bar-models" to represent specific quantities of an object. [11] [24] This involves drawing a rectangular bar to represent a specific quantity. For instance, if a short bar represents five paper clips, a bar that is twice as long would represent ten. By visualizing the difference between the two bars, students learn to solve problems of addition by adding one bar to the other, which will, in this instance, produce an answer of fifteen paper clips. They can use this method to solve other mathematical problems involving subtraction, multiplication, and division. [11] [21] Bar modeling is far more efficient than the "guess-and-check" approach, in which students simply guess combinations of numbers until they stumble onto the solution. [11]

Once students have learned to solve mathematical problems using bar modeling, they begin to solve mathematical problems with exclusively abstract tools: numbers and symbols.

The whole-part model can also be used to solve a multiplication problem. Whole-part model multiplication.jpg
The whole-part model can also be used to solve a multiplication problem.

Bar modeling

Bar modeling is a pictorial method used to solve word problems in arithmetic. [21] [25] These bar models can come in multiple forms such as a whole-part or a comparison model.

With the whole-part model, students would draw a rectangular bar to represent a "whole" larger quantity, which can be subdivided into two or more "parts." A student could be exposed to a word problem involving addition such as:

If John has 70 apples and Jane has 30 apples, how many apples do they both have?

The solution to this problem could be solved by drawing one bar and dividing it into two parts, with the longer part as 70 and the shorter part as 30. By visualizing these two parts, students would simply solve the above word problem by adding both parts together to build a whole bar of 100. Conversely, a student could use whole-part model to solve a subtraction problem such as 100 - 70, by having the longer part be 70 and the whole bar be 100. They would then solve the problem by inferring the shorter part to be 30.

The bar model can be drawn as a comparison model to compare two bars of unequal lengths, which can then be used to solve a subtraction problem. Comparison model subtraction.jpg
The bar model can be drawn as a comparison model to compare two bars of unequal lengths, which can then be used to solve a subtraction problem.

The whole-part model can also be used to solve problems involving multiplication or division. [26] A multiplication problem could be presented as follows:

How much money would Jane have if she saved $30 each week for 4 weeks in a row?

The student could solve this multiplication problem by drawing one bar to represent the unknown answer, and subdivide that bar into four equal parts, with each part representing $30. Based on the drawn model, the student could then visualize this problem as providing a solution of $120.

Unlike the whole-part model, a comparison model involves comparing two bars of unequal lengths. [21] [25] It can be used to solve a subtraction problem such as the following:

John needs to walk 100 miles to reach his home. So far, he has walked 70 miles. How many miles does he have left to walk home?

By using the comparison model, the student would draw one long bar to represent 100 and another shorter bar to represent 70. By comparing these two bars, students could then solve for the difference between the two numbers, which in this case is 30 miles. Like the whole-part model, the comparison model can also be used to solve word problems involving addition, multiplication, and division.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mathematics education</span> Mathematics teaching, learning and scholarly research

In contemporary education, mathematics education—known in Europe as the didactics or pedagogy of mathematics—is the practice of teaching, learning, and carrying out scholarly research into the transfer of mathematical knowledge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Math</span> Approach to teaching mathematics in the 1960s

New Mathematics or New Math was a dramatic but temporary change in the way mathematics was taught in American grade schools, and to a lesser extent in European countries and elsewhere, during the 1950s–1970s. Curriculum topics and teaching practices were changed in the U.S. shortly after the Sputnik crisis. The goal was to boost students' science education and mathematical skills to compete with Soviet engineers, reputedly highly skilled mathematicians.

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM) are guidelines produced by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in 2000, setting forth recommendations for mathematics educators. They form a national vision for preschool through twelfth grade mathematics education in the US and Canada. It is the primary model for standards-based mathematics.

Founded in 1920, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) is a professional organization for schoolteachers of mathematics in the United States. One of its goals is to improve the standards of mathematics in education. NCTM holds annual national and regional conferences for teachers and publishes five journals.

Mathematics education in New York in regard to both content and teaching method can vary depending on the type of school a person attends. Private school math education varies between schools whereas New York has statewide public school requirements where standardized tests are used to determine if the teaching method and educator are effective in transmitting content to the students. While an individual private school can choose the content and educational method to use, New York State mandates content and methods statewide. Some public schools have and continue to use established methods, such as Montessori for teaching such required content. New York State has used various foci of content and methods of teaching math including New Math (1960s), 'back to the basics' (1970s), Whole Math (1990s), Integrated Math, and Everyday Mathematics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</span> Study of international math and science skills

The IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is a series of international assessments of the mathematics and science knowledge of students around the world. The participating students come from a diverse set of educational systems in terms of economic development, geographical location, and population size. In each of the participating educational systems, a minimum of 4,000 to 5,000 students is evaluated. Contextual data about the conditions in which participating students learn mathematics and science are collected from the students and their teachers, their principals, and their parents via questionnaires.

Traditional mathematics was the predominant method of mathematics education in the United States in the early-to-mid 20th century. This contrasts with non-traditional approaches to math education. Traditional mathematics education has been challenged by several reform movements over the last several decades, notably new math, a now largely abandoned and discredited set of alternative methods, and most recently reform or standards-based mathematics based on NCTM standards, which is federally supported and has been widely adopted, but subject to ongoing criticism.

Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space is a K–5 mathematics curriculum, developed at TERC in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. The curriculum is often referred to as Investigations or simply TERC. Patterned after the NCTM standards for mathematics, it is among the most widely used of the new reform mathematics curricula. As opposed to referring to textbooks and having teachers impose methods for solving arithmetic problems, the TERC program uses a constructivist approach that encourages students to develop their own understanding of mathematics. The curriculum underwent a major revision in 2005–2007.

MathLand was one of several elementary mathematics curricula that were designed around the 1989 NCTM standards. It was developed and published by Creative Publications and was initially adopted by the U.S. state of California and schools run by the US Department of Defense by the mid 1990s. Unlike curricula such as Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space, by 2007 Mathland was no longer offered by the publisher, and has since been dropped by many early adopters. Its demise may have been, at least in part, a result of intense scrutiny by critics.

Integrated mathematics is the term used in the United States to describe the style of mathematics education which integrates many topics or strands of mathematics throughout each year of secondary school. Each math course in secondary school covers topics in algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus. Nearly all countries throughout the world, except the United States, follow this type of curriculum.

Math wars is the debate over modern mathematics education, textbooks and curricula in the United States that was triggered by the publication in 1989 of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and subsequent development and widespread adoption of a new generation of mathematics curricula inspired by these standards.

Connected Mathematics is a comprehensive mathematics program intended for U.S. students in grades 6-8. The curriculum design, text materials for students, and supporting resources for teachers were created and have been progressively refined by the Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) at Michigan State University with advice and contributions from many mathematics teachers, curriculum developers, mathematicians, and mathematics education researchers.

Recall of facts is a value of education which is to be de-emphasized in reform of science according to new American national curriculum standards. Recall facts is often associated with rote learning.

Reform mathematics is an approach to mathematics education, particularly in North America. It is based on principles explained in 1989 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The NCTM document Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (CESSM) set forth a vision for K–12 mathematics education in the United States and Canada. The CESSM recommendations were adopted by many local- and federal-level education agencies during the 1990s. In 2000, the NCTM revised its CESSM with the publication of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM). Like those in the first publication, the updated recommendations became the basis for many states' mathematics standards, and the method in textbooks developed by many federally-funded projects. The CESSM de-emphasised manual arithmetic in favor of students developing their own conceptual thinking and problem solving. The PSSM presents a more balanced view, but still has the same emphases.

In mathematics education at primary school level, a number bond is a simple addition sum which has become so familiar that a child can recognise it and complete it almost instantly, with recall as automatic as that of an entry from a multiplication table in multiplication.

The Common Core State Standards Initiative, also known as simply Common Core, is an educational initiative from 2010 that details what K–12 students throughout the United States should know in English language arts and mathematics at the conclusion of each school grade. The initiative is sponsored by the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers.

A three-part lesson is an inquiry-based learning method used to teach mathematics in K–12 schools.

A tape diagram is a rectangular visual model resembling a piece of tape, that is used to assist with the calculation of ratios and addition, subtraction, and commonly multiplication. It is also known as a divided bar model, fraction strip, length model or strip diagram. In mathematics education, it is used to solve word problems for children in elementary school.

Peng Yee Lee is a Singaporean mathematician and mathematics educator. Lee is an associate professor of mathematics at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. He is a former president of the Southeast Asian Mathematical Society, a former vice president of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction, and a former president of the Association of Mathematics Educators of Singapore.

PR1ME Mathematics teaching programme (PR1ME) is created for the primary or elementary grades and was first introduced in 2014 by Scholastic. It is adopted by schools in multiple countries such as Philippines, Australia, New Zealand and Mexico. PR1ME is a programme based on the Mathematics teaching and learning practices of Singapore, Hong Kong and Republic of Korea, which have consistently performed strongly in international mathematics studies such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). This programme was developed in collaboration with the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore and is adapted from the Primary Mathematics Project developed by MOE.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 The Independent (July 2, 2009). "Box clever: Singapore's magic formula for maths success". The Independent.
  2. 1 2 3 Brown, Laura L. "What's Singapore Math?". PBS. Retrieved September 19, 2013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hu, Winnie (September 30, 2010). "Making Math Lessons as Easy as 1, Pause, 2, Pause ..." The New York Times. New York, NY.
  4. 1 2 Jackson, Bill (July 26, 2011). "Going Beyond Singapore Math: Resisting Quick Fixes" (PDF). Singapore Math Source. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
  5. 1 2 Knake, Lindsay (December 2011). "Saginaw Township elementary schools implement hands-on Singapore math program". MLive. Grand Rapids, MI.
  6. ↑ Jackson, Bill (October 10, 2012). "My view: America's students can benefit from Singapore math". CNN. Atlanta, GA.
  7. ↑ Wright, Gerard (May 12, 2008). "Mathematics Mighty Ducks". The Age. Australia.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Prystay, Cris (December 13, 2004). "As math skills slip, U.S. schools seek answers from Asia". The Wall Street Journal.
  9. 1 2 Wong, Khoon Yoong; Lee, Ngan Hoe (February 19, 2009). "Singapore education and mathematics curriculum". In Wong Koon Yoong; Lee Peng Yee; Berinderjeet Kaur; Foong Pui Yee; Ng Swee Fong (eds.). Mathematics Education: The Singapore Journey. Vol. 2. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. pp. 13–47. ISBN   978-981-283-375-4.
  10. ↑ "Mathemagis: Introducing Singapore Math in the Philippines". SmartParenting.com.ph. 2012-04-12. Retrieved 2019-09-27.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Garelick, Barry (Fall 2006). "Miracle math: A successful program from Singapore tests the limits of school reform in the suburbs". Educational Next. 6.
  12. 1 2 Gurney-Read, Josie (November 29, 2016). "Revealed: World pupil rankings in science and maths - TIMSS results in full". The Daily Telegraph.
  13. ↑ Lee, Peng Yee (September 12, 2008). "Sixty years of mathematics syllabi and textbooks in Singapore". In Usiskin, Zalman; Willmore, Edwin (eds.). Mathematics Curriculum in Pacific Rim Countries—China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore Proceedings of a Conference. Information Age Publishing. pp. 85–92. ISBN   978-1-59311-953-9.
  14. 1 2 3 Garelick, Barry (2006). "A tale of two countries and one school district". Nonpartisan Education Review. 6 (8). Archived from the original on 2013-09-21. Retrieved 2013-09-20.
  15. 1 2 Fang, Yanping; Lee, Christine Kim-Eng; Haron, Sharifah Thalha Bte Syed (February 19, 2009). "Lesson study in mathematics: Three cases in Singapore". In Wong Koon Yoong; Lee Peng Yee; Berinderjeet Kaur; Foong Pui Yee; Ng Swee Fong (eds.). Mathematics Education: The Singapore Journey. Vol. 2. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. pp. 104–129. ISBN   978-981-283-375-4.
  16. 1 2 Landsberg, Mitchell (March 9, 2008). "In L.A., Singapore math has added value". Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, CA.
  17. ↑ Coughlan, Sean (December 6, 2016). "Pisa tests: Singapore top in global education rankings". BBC.
  18. ↑ Dillon, sam (December 7, 2010). "Top test scores from shanghai stun educators". New York Times. New York, NY.
  19. ↑ The Economist (December 7, 2013). "Finn-ished". The Economist.
  20. ↑ Moroney, Kyle (December 2, 2013). "How Common Core standards are affecting elementary, middle school math classes". MLive.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Hoven, John; Garelick, Barry (November 2007). "Singapore Math: Using the bar model approach, Singapore textbooks enable students to solve difficult math problems--and learn how to think symbolically" (PDF). Educational Leadership. 65: 28–21. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-19. Retrieved 2013-09-20.
  22. ↑ National Mathematics Advisory Panel (March 2008). "Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel" (PDF). U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 13, 2013.
  23. ↑ Garland, Sarah (October 16, 2013). "How Does Common Core Compare?". Huffington Post.
  24. 1 2 3 BBC (December 2, 2013). "Can the Singapore method help your children learn maths?". BBC.
  25. 1 2 Frank Schaffer Publications (June 2009). "Introduction to Singapore Math". 70 Must-Know Word Problems, Grade 7 (Singapore Math) (workbook ed.). Frank Schaffer Publications. pp. 3–8. ISBN   978-0-7682-4016-0.
  26. ↑ Jackson, Bill. "Singapore math bar model strategy" (PDF). The Daily Riff. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.