Mathematics education

Last updated
A mathematics lecture at Aalto University School of Science and Technology Mathematics lecture at the Helsinki University of Technology.jpg
A mathematics lecture at Aalto University School of Science and Technology

In contemporary education, mathematics education is the practice of teaching and learning mathematics, along with the associated scholarly research.


Researchers in mathematics education are primarily concerned with the tools, methods and approaches that facilitate practice or the study of practice; however, mathematics education research, known on the continent of Europe as the didactics or pedagogy of mathematics, has developed into an extensive field of study, with its concepts, theories, methods, national and international organisations, conferences and literature. This article describes some of the history, influences and recent controversies.


Elementary mathematics was part of the education system in most ancient civilisations, including Ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, Vedic society and ancient Egypt. In most cases, formal education was only available to male children with sufficiently high status, wealth or caste.

Illustration at the beginning of the 14th-century translation of Euclid's Elements. Woman teaching geometry.jpg
Illustration at the beginning of the 14th-century translation of Euclid's Elements.

In Plato's division of the liberal arts into the trivium and the quadrivium, the quadrivium included the mathematical fields of arithmetic and geometry. This structure was continued in the structure of classical education that was developed in medieval Europe. The teaching of geometry was almost universally based on Euclid's Elements. Apprentices to trades such as masons, merchants and money-lenders could expect to learn such practical mathematics as was relevant to their profession.

In the Renaissance, the academic status of mathematics declined, because it was strongly associated with trade and commerce, and considered somewhat un-Christian. [1] Although it continued to be taught in European universities, it was seen as subservient to the study of Natural, Metaphysical and Moral Philosophy. The first modern arithmetic curriculum (starting with addition, then subtraction, multiplication, and division) arose at reckoning schools in Italy in the 1300s. [2] Spreading along trade routes, these methods were designed to be used in commerce. They contrasted with Platonic math taught at universities, which was more philosophical and concerned numbers as concepts rather than calculating methods. [2] They also contrasted with mathematical methods learned by artisan apprentices, which were specific to the tasks and tools at hand. For example, the division of a board into thirds can be accomplished with a piece of string, instead of measuring the length and using the arithmetic operation of division. [1]

The first mathematics textbooks to be written in English and French were published by Robert Recorde, beginning with The Grounde of Artes in 1543. However, there are many different writings on mathematics and mathematics methodology that date back to 1800 BCE. These were mostly located in Mesopotamia where the Sumerians were practicing multiplication and division. There are also artifacts demonstrating their methodology for solving equations like the quadratic equation. After the Sumerians, some of the most famous ancient works on mathematics come from Egypt in the form of the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus and the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus. The more famous Rhind Papyrus has been dated to approximately 1650 BCE but it is thought to be a copy of an even older scroll. This papyrus was essentially an early textbook for Egyptian students.

The social status of mathematical study was improving by the seventeenth century, with the University of Aberdeen creating a Mathematics Chair in 1613, followed by the Chair in Geometry being set up in University of Oxford in 1619 and the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics being established by the University of Cambridge in 1662.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Industrial Revolution led to an enormous increase in urban populations. Basic numeracy skills, such as the ability to tell the time, count money and carry out simple arithmetic, became essential in this new urban lifestyle. Within the new public education systems, mathematics became a central part of the curriculum from an early age.

By the twentieth century, mathematics was part of the core curriculum in all developed countries.

During the twentieth century, mathematics education was established as an independent field of research. Here are some of the main events in this development:

In the 20th century, the cultural impact of the "electronic age" (McLuhan) was also taken up by educational theory and the teaching of mathematics. While previous approach focused on "working with specialized 'problems' in arithmetic", the emerging structural approach to knowledge had "small children meditating about number theory and 'sets'." [4]


Boy doing sums, Guinea-Bissau, 1974. ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - C 05 - School in Sara, Guinea-Bissau - Boy in front of blackboard - 1974.tif
Boy doing sums, Guinea-Bissau, 1974.

At different times and in different cultures and countries, mathematics education has attempted to achieve a variety of different objectives. These objectives have included:


The method or methods used in any particular context are largely determined by the objectives that the relevant educational system is trying to achieve. Methods of teaching mathematics include the following:

Games can motivate students to improve skills that are usually learned by rote. In "Number Bingo," players roll 3 dice, then perform basic mathematical operations on those numbers to get a new number, which they cover on the board trying to cover 4 squares in a row. This game was played at a "Discovery Day" organized by Big Brother Mouse in Laos. Number bingo improves math skills LPB Laos.jpg
Games can motivate students to improve skills that are usually learned by rote. In "Number Bingo," players roll 3 dice, then perform basic mathematical operations on those numbers to get a new number, which they cover on the board trying to cover 4 squares in a row. This game was played at a "Discovery Day" organized by Big Brother Mouse in Laos.

Content and age levels

Different levels of mathematics are taught at different ages and in somewhat different sequences in different countries. Sometimes a class may be taught at an earlier age than typical as a special or honors class.

Elementary mathematics in most countries is taught similarly, though there are differences. Most countries tend to cover fewer topics in greater depth than in the United States. [18] During the primary school years, children learn about whole numbers and their arithmetic, including addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. [19] Comparisons and measurement are taught, in both numeric and pictorial form, as well as fractions and proportionality, patterns, and various topics related to geometry. [20]

At high school level, in most of the U.S., algebra, geometry and analysis (pre-calculus and calculus) are taught as separate courses in different years. Mathematics in most other countries (and in a few U.S. states) is integrated, with topics from all branches of mathematics studied every year. Students in many countries choose an option or pre-defined course of study rather than choosing courses à la carte as in the United States. Students in science-oriented curricula typically study differential calculus and trigonometry at age 16–17 and integral calculus, complex numbers, analytic geometry, exponential and logarithmic functions, and infinite series in their final year of secondary school. Probability and statistics may be taught in secondary education classes. In some countries, these topics are available as "advanced" or "additional" mathematics.

At college and university, science- and engineering students will be required to take multivariable calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra; at several US colleges, the minor or AS in mathematics substantively comprises these courses. Mathematics majors continue to study various other areas within pure mathematics - and often in applied mathematics - with the requirement of specified advanced courses in analysis and modern algebra. Applied mathematics may be taken as a major subject in its own right, while specific topics are taught within other courses: for example, civil engineers may be required to study fluid mechanics, [21] and "math for computer science" might include graph theory, permutation, probability, and formal mathematical proofs. [22] Pure and applied math degrees often include modules in probability theory / mathematical statistics; while a course in numerical methods is often a requirement for applied math. (Theoretical) physics is mathematics intensive, often overlapping substantively with the pure or applied math degree. ("Business mathematics" is usually limited to introductory calculus and, sometimes, matrix calculations. Economics programs additionally cover optimization, often differential equations and linear algebra, sometimes analysis.)


Throughout most of history, standards for mathematics education were set locally, by individual schools or teachers, depending on the levels of achievement that were relevant to, realistic for, and considered socially appropriate for their pupils.

In modern times, there has been a move towards regional or national standards, usually under the umbrella of a wider standard school curriculum. In England, for example, standards for mathematics education are set as part of the National Curriculum for England, [23] while Scotland maintains its own educational system. Many other countries have centralized ministries which set national standards or curricula, and sometimes even textbooks.

Ma (2000) summarised the research of others who found, based on nationwide data, that students with higher scores on standardised mathematics tests had taken more mathematics courses in high school. This led some states to require three years of mathematics instead of two. But because this requirement was often met by taking another lower-level mathematics course, the additional courses had a “diluted” effect in raising achievement levels. [24]

In North America, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) published the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics in 2000 for the US and Canada, which boosted the trend towards reform mathematics. In 2006, the NCTM released Curriculum Focal Points , which recommend the most important mathematical topics for each grade level through grade 8. However, these standards were guidelines to implement as American states and Canadian provinces chose. In 2010, the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers published the Common Core State Standards for US states, which were subsequently adopted by most states. Adoption of the Common Core State Standards in mathematics is at the discretion of each state, and is not mandated by the federal government. [25] "States routinely review their academic standards and may choose to change or add onto the standards to best meet the needs of their students." [26] The NCTM has state affiliates that have different education standards at the state level. For example, Missouri has the Missouri Council of Teachers of Mathematics (MCTM) which has its pillars and standards of education listed on its website. The MCTM also offers membership opportunities to teachers and future teachers so they can stay up to date on the changes in math educational standards. [27]

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), created by the Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), is a global program studying the reading, science and mathematic abilities of 15-year-old students. [28] The first assessment was conducted in the year 2000 with 43 countries participating. [29] PISA has repeated this assessment every three years to provide comparable data, helping to guide global education to better prepare youth for future economies. There have been many ramifications following the results of triennial PISA assessments due to implicit and explicit responses of stakeholders, which have led to education reform and policy change. [29] [30] [13]


"Robust, useful theories of classroom teaching do not yet exist". [31] However, there are useful theories on how children learn mathematics and much research has been conducted in recent decades to explore how these theories can be applied to teaching. The following results are examples of some of the current findings in the field of mathematics education:

Important results [31]
One of the strongest results in recent research is that the most important feature of effective teaching is giving students "opportunity to learn". Teachers can set expectations, time, kinds of tasks, questions, acceptable answers, and type of discussions that will influence students' opportunity to learn. This must involve both skill efficiency and conceptual understanding.
Conceptual understanding [31]
Two of the most important features of teaching in the promotion of conceptual understanding are attending explicitly to concepts and allowing students to struggle with important mathematics. Both of these features have been confirmed through a wide variety of studies. Explicit attention to concepts involves making connections between facts, procedures and ideas. (This is often seen as one of the strong points in mathematics teaching in East Asian countries, where teachers typically devote about half of their time to making connections. At the other extreme is the U.S.A., where essentially no connections are made in school classrooms. [32] ) These connections can be made through explanation of the meaning of a procedure, questions comparing strategies and solutions of problems, noticing how one problem is a special case of another, reminding students of the main point, discussing how lessons connect, and so on.
Deliberate, productive struggle with mathematical ideas refers to the fact that when students exert effort with important mathematical ideas, even if this struggle initially involves confusion and errors, the result is greater learning. This is true whether the struggle is due to challenging, well-implemented teaching, or due to faulty teaching, the students must struggle to make sense of.
Formative assessment [33]
Formative assessment is both the best and cheapest way to boost student achievement, student engagement and teacher professional satisfaction. Results surpass those of reducing class size or increasing teachers' content knowledge. Effective assessment is based on clarifying what students should know, creating appropriate activities to obtain the evidence needed, giving good feedback, encouraging students to take control of their learning and letting students be resources for one another.
Homework [34]
Homework which leads students to practice past lessons or prepare future lessons is more effective than those going over today's lesson. Students benefit from feedback. Students with learning disabilities or low motivation may profit from rewards. For younger children, homework helps simple skills, but not broader measures of achievement.
Students with difficulties [34]
Students with genuine difficulties (unrelated to motivation or past instruction) struggle with basic facts, answer impulsively, struggle with mental representations, have poor number sense and have poor short-term memory. Techniques that have been found productive for helping such students include peer-assisted learning, explicit teaching with visual aids, instruction informed by formative assessment and encouraging students to think aloud.
Algebraic reasoning [34]
Elementary school children need to spend a long time learning to express algebraic properties without symbols before learning algebraic notation. When learning symbols, many students believe letters always represent unknowns and struggle with the concept of variable. They prefer arithmetic reasoning to algebraic equations for solving word problems. It takes time to move from arithmetic to algebraic generalizations to describe patterns. Students often have trouble with the minus sign and understand the equals sign to mean "the answer is...."


As with other educational research (and the social sciences in general), mathematics education research depends on both quantitative and qualitative studies. Quantitative research includes studies that use inferential statistics to answer specific questions, such as whether a certain teaching method gives significantly better results than the status quo. The best quantitative studies involve randomized trials where students or classes are randomly assigned different methods to test their effects. They depend on large samples to obtain statistically significant results.

Qualitative research, such as case studies, action research, discourse analysis, and clinical interviews, depend on small but focused samples in an attempt to understand student learning and to look at how and why a given method gives the results it does. Such studies cannot conclusively establish that one method is better than another, as randomized trials can, but unless it is understood why treatment X is better than treatment Y, application of results of quantitative studies will often lead to "lethal mutations" [31] of the finding in actual classrooms. Exploratory qualitative research is also useful for suggesting new hypotheses, which can eventually be tested by randomized experiments. Both qualitative and quantitative studies, therefore, are considered essential in education—just as in the other social sciences. [35] Many studies are “mixed”, simultaneously combining aspects of both quantitative and qualitative research, as appropriate.

Randomized trials

There has been some controversy over the relative strengths of different types of research. Because randomized trials provide clear, objective evidence on “what works”, policymakers often consider only those studies. Some scholars have pushed for more random experiments in which teaching methods are randomly assigned to classes. [36] [37] In other disciplines concerned with human subjects, like biomedicine, psychology, and policy evaluation, controlled, randomized experiments remain the preferred method of evaluating treatments. [38] [39] Educational statisticians and some mathematics educators have been working to increase the use of randomized experiments to evaluate teaching methods. [37] On the other hand, many scholars in educational schools have argued against increasing the number of randomized experiments, often because of philosophical objections, such as the ethical difficulty of randomly assigning students to various treatments when the effects of such treatments are not yet known to be effective, [40] or the difficulty of assuring rigid control of the independent variable in fluid, real school settings. [41]

In the United States, the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP) published a report in 2008 based on studies, some of which used randomized assignment of treatments to experimental units, such as classrooms or students. The NMAP report's preference for randomized experiments received criticism from some scholars. [42] In 2010, the What Works Clearinghouse (essentially the research arm for the Department of Education) responded to ongoing controversy by extending its research base to include non-experimental studies, including regression discontinuity designs and single-case studies. [43]


See also

Aspects of mathematics education
North American issues
Mathematical difficulties

Related Research Articles

New Math Style of teaching mathematics in the 1960s

New Mathematics or New Math was a dramatic change in the way mathematics was taught in American grade schools, and to a lesser extent in European countries and elsewhere, during the 1950s–1970s. Curriculum topics and teaching practices were changed in the U.S. shortly after the Sputnik crisis. The goal was to boost students' science education and mathematical skill to meet the technological threat of Soviet engineers, reputedly highly skilled mathematicians.

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM) are guidelines produced by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in 2000, setting forth recommendations for mathematics educators. They form a national vision for preschool through twelfth grade mathematics education in the US and Canada. It is the primary model for standards-based mathematics.

Founded in 1920, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) is the world's largest mathematics education organization.

Mathematics education in New York in regard to both content and teaching method can vary depending on the type of school a person attends. Private school math education varies between schools whereas New York has statewide public school requirements where standardized tests are used to determine if the teaching method and educator are effective in transmitting content to the students. While an individual private school can choose the content and educational method to use, New York State mandates content and methods statewide. Some public schools have and continue to use established methods, such as Montessori for teaching such required content. New York State has used various foci of content and methods of teaching math including New Math (1960s), 'back to the basics' (1970s), Whole Math (1990s), Integrated Math, and Everyday Mathematics.

In elementary arithmetic, a standard algorithm or method is a specific method of computation which is conventionally taught for solving particular mathematical problems. These methods vary somewhat by nation and time, but generally include exchanging, regrouping, long division, and long multiplication using a standard notation, and standard formulas for average, area, and volume. Similar methods also exist for procedures such as square root and even more sophisticated functions, but have fallen out of the general mathematics curriculum in favor of calculators.

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study

The IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) is a series of international assessments of the mathematics and science knowledge of students around the world. The participating students come from a diverse set of educational systems in terms of economic development, geographical location, and population size. In each of the participating educational systems, a minimum of 4,500 to 5,000 students is evaluated. Contextual data about the conditions in which participating students learn mathematics and science are collected from the students and their teachers, their principals, and their parents via questionnaires.

Core-Plus Mathematics Project

Core-Plus Mathematics is a high school mathematics program consisting of a four-year series of print and digital student textbooks and supporting materials for teachers, developed by the Core-Plus Mathematics Project (CPMP) at Western Michigan University, with funding from the National Science Foundation. Development of the program started in 1992. The first edition, entitled Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A Unified Approach, was completed in 1995. The third edition, entitled Core-Plus Mathematics: Contemporary Mathematics in Context, was published by McGraw-Hill Education in 2015.

Traditional mathematics was the predominant method of mathematics education in the United States in the early-to-mid 20th century. This contrasts with non-traditional approaches to math education. Traditional mathematics education has been challenged by several reform movements over the last several decades, notably new math, a now largely abandoned and discredited set of alternative methods, and most recently reform or standards-based mathematics based on NCTM standards, which is federally supported and has been widely adopted, but subject to ongoing criticism.

Investigations in Numbers, Data, and Space is a K–5 mathematics curriculum, developed at TERC in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. The curriculum is often referred to as Investigations or simply TERC. Patterned after the NCTM standards for mathematics, it is among the most widely used of the new reform mathematics curricula. As opposed to referring to textbooks and having teachers impose methods for solving arithmetic problems, the TERC program uses a constructivist approach that encourages students to develop their own understanding of mathematics. The curriculum underwent a major revision in 2005–2007.

Basic skills can be compared to higher order thinking skills. Facts and methods are highly valued under the back-to-basics approach to education.

Integrated mathematics is the term used in the United States to describe the style of mathematics education which integrates many topics or strands of mathematics throughout each year of secondary school. Each math course in secondary school covers topics in algebra, geometry, trigonometry and analysis. Nearly all countries throughout the world, except the United States, follow this type of curriculum.

Math wars is the debate over modern mathematics education, textbooks and curricula in the United States that was triggered by the publication in 1989 of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and subsequent development and widespread adoption of a new generation of mathematics curricula inspired by these standards.

Mathematical anxiety, also known as math phobia, is anxiety about one's ability to do mathematics. It is a phenomenon that is often considered when examining students' problems in mathematics.

Connected Mathematics is a comprehensive mathematics program intended for U.S. students in grades 6-8. The curriculum design, text materials for students, and supporting resources for teachers were created and have been progressively refined by the Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) at Michigan State University with advice and contributions from many mathematics teachers, curriculum developers, mathematicians, and mathematics education researchers.

Reform mathematics is an approach to mathematics education, particularly in North America. It is based on principles explained in 1989 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The NCTM document, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, attempted to set forth a vision for K-12 mathematics education in the United States and Canada. Their recommendations were adopted by many education agencies, from local to federal levels through the 1990s. In 2000, NCTM revised its standards with the publication of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM). Like the first publication, these updated standards have continued to serve as the basis for many states' mathematics standards, and for many federally funded textbook projects. The first standards gave a strong call for a de-emphasis on manual arithmetic in favor of students' discovering their own knowledge and conceptual thinking. The PSSM has taken a more balanced view, but still emphasizes conceptual thinking and problem solving.

From kindergarten through high school, the mathematics education in public schools in the United States has historically varied widely from state to state, and often even varies considerably within individual states. With the recent adoption of the Common Core Standards by 45 states, mathematics content across the country is moving into closer agreement for each grade level.

Statistics education is the practice of teaching and learning of statistics, along with the associated scholarly research.

The Common Core State Standards Initiative is an educational initiative from 2010 that details what K–12 students throughout the United States should know in English language arts and mathematics at the conclusion of each school grade. The initiative is sponsored by the following organizations:

Modern elementary mathematics is the theory and practice of teaching elementary mathematics according to contemporary research and thinking about learning. This can include pedagogical ideas, mathematics education research frameworks, and curricular material.

A mathematical exercise is a routine application of algebra or other mathematics to a stated challenge. Mathematics teachers assign mathematical exercises to develop the skills of their students. Early exercises deal with addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of integers. Extensive courses of exercises in school extend such arithmetic to rational numbers. Various approaches to geometry have based exercises on relations of angles, segments, and triangles. The topic of trigonometry gains many of its exercises from the trigonometric identities. In college mathematics exercises often depend on functions of a real variable or application of theorems. The standard exercises of calculus involve finding derivatives and integrals of specified functions.


  1. 1 2 Gabrielle Emanuel (23 Jul 2016). "Why We Learn Math Lessons That Date Back 500 Years". National Public Radio.
  2. 1 2 "Why We Learn Math Lessons That Date Back 500 Years".
  3. William L. Schaaf (1941) A Bibliography of Mathematical Education, Forest Hills, N.Y. : Stevinus Press, link from HathiTrust
  4. Marshall McLuhan (1964) Understanding Media , p.13 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-12-08. Retrieved 2007-09-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  5. Education, McGraw-Hill (2017-10-20). "5 Approaches to Teaching PreK-12 Numeracy". Inspired Ideas. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  6. "Euclidean Geometry". Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  7. "Axiomatic Systems". Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  8. "Heuristics". Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  9. "Classical Education and STEM: a Common Misconception". Clapham School. 2018-01-25. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  10. "Passing Mathematics Just Got Easier For Students With This New Platform: Mathematica - Techzim". Techzim. 2018-06-16. Retrieved 2018-06-19.
  11. "5 Apps to Help All Students with Math". Technology Solutions That Drive Education. 2017-10-13. Retrieved 2018-06-19.
  12. Mosbergen, Dominique (2014-10-22). "This Free App Will Solve Math Problems For You". Huffington Post. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  13. 1 2 3 Ansari, D. (2016, March). No more math wars: an evidence-based, developmental perspective on math education. Education Digest, 81(7), 10–16. Retrieved from
  14. Stokke, Anna (2015). What to Do About Canada's Declining Math Scores. Toronto, Ontario: C.D. Howe Institute. pp. 4–5. ISBN   9780888069498.
  15. Sriraman, Bharath (2012). Crossroads in the History of Mathematics and Mathematics Education. Monograph Series in Mathematics Education. 12. IAP. ISBN   978-1-61735-704-6.
  16. Singmaster, David (7 September 1993). "The Unreasonable Utility of Recreational Mathematics". For First European Congress of Mathematics, Paris, July, 1992. Archived from the original on 7 February 2002. Retrieved 17 September 2012.
  17. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-11-20. Retrieved 2011-11-29.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  18. "Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel" (PDF). U.S. Department of Education. 2008. p. 20.
  19. Nunes, Terezinha; Dorneles, Beatriz Vargas; Lin, Pi-Jen; Rathgeb-Schnierer, Elisabeth (2016), "Teaching and Learning About Whole Numbers in Primary School", ICME-13 Topical Surveys, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–50, ISBN   978-3-319-45112-1 , retrieved 2021-02-03
  20. Mullis, Ina V. S.; et al. (June 1997). "Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years. IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)". Third International Mathematics and Science Study. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement; Boston College Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy. ISBN   1-889938-04-1.
  21. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-06-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  22. "Mathematics for Computer Science". MIT OpenCourseWare.
  23. "Mathematics curriculum". UK Department of Education. 17 January 2013.
  24. Ma, X. (2000). "A longitudinal assessment of antecedent course work in mathematics and subsequent mathematical attainment". Journal of Educational Research. 94 (1): 16–29. doi:10.1080/00220670009598739. S2CID   144948416.
  25. "Myths vs. Facts - Common Core State Standards Initiative".
  26. "Standards in Your State - Common Core State Standards Initiative".
  27. "MoCTM - Home".
  28. "What is PISA?". OECD. 2018.
  29. 1 2 Lockheed, Marlaine (2015). The Experience of Middle-Income Countries Participating in PISA 2000. PISA. France: OECD Publishing. p. 30. ISBN   978-92-64-24618-8.
  30. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B., Sam; Lingard, Bob (April 2018). "International large-scale assessments, affective worlds and policy impacts in education" (PDF). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 31 (5): 367–381. doi:10.1080/09518398.2018.1449982. S2CID   149999527.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. 1 2 3 4 Hiebert, James; Grouws, Douglas (2007), "9", The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students' Learning, 1, Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 371–404
  32. Institute of Education Sciences, ed. (2003), "Highlights From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study of Eighth-Grade Mathematics Teaching", Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) - Overview, U.S. Department of Education
  33. Black, P.; Wiliam, Dylan (1998). "Assessment and Classroom Learning" (PDF). Assessment in Education. 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
  34. 1 2 3 "Research clips and briefs".
  35. Raudenbush, Stephen (2005). "Learning from Attempts to Improve Schooling: The Contribution of Methodological Diversity". Educational Researcher. 34 (5): 25–31. CiteSeerX . doi:10.3102/0013189X034005025. S2CID   145667765.
  36. Cook, Thomas D. (2002). "Randomized Experiments in Educational Policy Research: A Critical Examination of the Reasons the Educational Evaluation Community has Offered for Not Doing Them". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 24 (3): 175–199. doi:10.3102/01623737024003175. S2CID   144583638.
  37. 1 2 Working Group on Statistics in Mathematics Education Research (2007). "Using Statistics Effectively in Mathematics Education Research: A report from a series of workshops organized by the American Statistical Association with funding from the National Science Foundation" (PDF). The American Statistical Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-02-02. Retrieved 2013-03-25.
  38. Shadish, William R.; Cook, Thomas D.; Campbell, Donald T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN   978-0-395-61556-0.
  39. See articles on NCLB, National Mathematics Advisory Panel, Scientifically based research and What Works Clearinghouse
  40. Mosteller, Frederick; Boruch, Robert (2002), Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research, Brookings Institution Press
  41. Chatterji, Madhabi (December 2004). "Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs". Educational Researcher. 33 (9): 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189x033009003. S2CID   14742527.
  42. Kelly, Anthony (2008). "Reflections on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report". Educational Researcher. 37 (9): 561–4. doi:10.3102/0013189X08329353. S2CID   143471869. This is the introductory article to an issue devoted to this debate on report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, particularly on its use of randomized experiments.
  43. Sparks, Sarah (October 20, 2010). "Federal Criteria For Studies Grow". Education Week. p. 1.

Further reading