Peer instruction

Last updated

Peer instruction is a teaching method popularized by Harvard Professor Eric Mazur in the early 1990s. [1] [2] Originally used in introductory undergraduate physics classes at Harvard University, peer instruction is used in various disciplines and institutions around the globe. It is a student-centered learning approach that involves flipping the traditional classroom. It expects students to prepare for class by exploring provided materials and then engage with a series of questions about the material in class.

Contents

Method

Peer instruction as a learning system works by moving information transfer out and moving information assimilation, or application of learning, into the classroom. [3] [4] [5] Students prepare to learn outside of class by doing pre-class readings and answering questions about those readings using another method, called Just in Time Teaching. [6] Then, in class, the instructor engages students by posing prepared conceptual questions or ConcepTests that are based on student difficulties. The questioning procedure outlined by Eric Mazur is as follows:

  1. Instructor poses question based on students' responses to their pre-class reading
  2. Students reflect on the question
  3. Students commit to an individual answer
  4. Instructor reviews student responses
  5. Students discuss their thinking and answers with their peers
  6. Students then commit again to an individual answer
  7. The instructor again reviews responses and decides whether more explanation is needed before moving on to the next concept. [2] [7]

Effectiveness

There is some research that supports the effectiveness of peer instruction over more traditional teaching methods, such as traditional lecture. [8] The effectiveness of peer instruction can depend on prior student knowledge. [9] A randomized controlled trial published in 2021 found no difference in total test scores for one laboratory exercise compared to traditional group work. [10]

Impact

Peer instruction has been used in a range of educational institutions [11] [12] around the globe [13] [14] and in many other disciplines, including philosophy, [15] psychology, [16] geology, [17] mathematics, [18] computer science [19] [20] and engineering. [14]

Related Research Articles

A teaching method is a set of principles and methods used by teachers to enable student learning. These strategies are determined partly by the subject matter to be taught, partly by the relative expertise of the learners, and partly by constraints caused by the learning environment. For a particular teaching method to be appropriate and efficient it has to take into account the learner, the nature of the subject matter, and the type of learning it is supposed to bring about.

Science education is the teaching and learning of science to school children, college students, or adults within the general public. The field of science education includes work in science content, science process, some social science, and some teaching pedagogy. The standards for science education provide expectations for the development of understanding for students through the entire course of their K-12 education and beyond. The traditional subjects included in the standards are physical, life, earth, space, and human sciences.

Instructional scaffolding is the support given to a student by an instructor throughout the learning process. This support is specifically tailored to each student; this instructional approach allows students to experience student-centered learning, which tends to facilitate more efficient learning than teacher-centered learning. This learning process promotes a deeper level of learning than many other common teaching strategies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Active learning</span> Educational technique

Active learning is "a method of learning in which students are actively or experientially involved in the learning process and where there are different levels of active learning, depending on student involvement." Bonwell & Eison (1991) states that "students participate [in active learning] when they are doing something besides passively listening." According to Hanson and Moser (2003) using active teaching techniques in the classroom can create better academic outcomes for students. Scheyvens, Griffin, Jocoy, Liu, & Bradford (2008) further noted that "by utilizing learning strategies that can include small-group work, role-play and simulations, data collection and analysis, active learning is purported to increase student interest and motivation and to build students ‘critical thinking, problem-solving and social skills". In a report from the Association for the Study of Higher Education, authors discuss a variety of methodologies for promoting active learning. They cite literature that indicates students must do more than just listen in order to learn. They must read, write, discuss, and be engaged in solving problems. This process relates to the three learning domains referred to as knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSA). This taxonomy of learning behaviors can be thought of as "the goals of the learning process." In particular, students must engage in such higher-order thinking tasks as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

A concept inventory is a criterion-referenced test designed to help determine whether a student has an accurate working knowledge of a specific set of concepts. Historically, concept inventories have been in the form of multiple-choice tests in order to aid interpretability and facilitate administration in large classes. Unlike a typical, teacher-authored multiple-choice test, questions and response choices on concept inventories are the subject of extensive research. The aims of the research include ascertaining (a) the range of what individuals think a particular question is asking and (b) the most common responses to the questions. Concept inventories are evaluated to ensure test reliability and validity. In its final form, each question includes one correct answer and several distractors.

Cooperative learning is an educational approach which aims to organize classroom activities into academic and social learning experiences. There is much more to cooperative learning than merely arranging students into groups, and it has been described as "structuring positive interdependence." Students must work in groups to complete tasks collectively toward academic goals. Unlike individual learning, which can be competitive in nature, students learning cooperatively can capitalize on one another's resources and skills. Furthermore, the teacher's role changes from giving information to facilitating students' learning. Everyone succeeds when the group succeeds. Ross and Smyth (1995) describe successful cooperative learning tasks as intellectually demanding, creative, open-ended, and involve higher-order thinking tasks. Cooperative learning has also been linked to increased levels of student satisfaction.

Physics education or physics teaching refers to the education methods currently used to teach physics. The occupation is called physics educator or physics teacher. Physics education research refers to an area of pedagogical research that seeks to improve those methods. Historically, physics has been taught at the high school and college level primarily by the lecture method together with laboratory exercises aimed at verifying concepts taught in the lectures. These concepts are better understood when lectures are accompanied with demonstration, hand-on experiments, and questions that require students to ponder what will happen in an experiment and why. Students who participate in active learning for example with hands-on experiments learn through self-discovery. By trial and error they learn to change their preconceptions about phenomena in physics and discover the underlying concepts. Physics education is part of the broader area of science education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eric Mazur</span> Dutch physicist (born 1954)

Eric Mazur is a physicist and educator at Harvard University, and an entrepreneur in technology start-ups for the educational and technology markets. Mazur's research is in experimental ultrafast optics, condensed matter physics and peer instruction. Born in Amsterdam, Netherlands, he received his undergraduate and graduate degrees from Leiden University. He served as the President of Optica in 2017.

The Mechanical Universe...And Beyond is a 52-part telecourse, filmed at the California Institute of Technology, that introduces university level physics, covering topics from Copernicus to quantum mechanics. The 1985-86 series was produced by Caltech and INTELECOM, a nonprofit consortium of California community colleges now known as Intelecom Learning, with financial support from Annenberg/CPB. The series, which aired on PBS affiliate stations before being distributed on LaserDisc and eventually YouTube, is known for its use of computer animation.

Audience Response is a type of interaction associated with the use of Audience Response systems to facilitate interaction between a presenter and their audience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific misconceptions</span> False beliefs about science

Scientific misconceptions are commonly held beliefs about science that have no basis in actual scientific fact. Scientific misconceptions can also refer to preconceived notions based on religious and/or cultural influences. Many scientific misconceptions occur because of faulty teaching styles and the sometimes distancing nature of true scientific texts. Because students' prior knowledge and misconceptions are important factors for learning science, science teachers should be able to identify and address these conceptions.

Inquiry-based learning is a form of active learning that starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios. It contrasts with traditional education, which generally relies on the teacher presenting facts and their knowledge about the subject. Inquiry-based learning is often assisted by a facilitator rather than a lecturer. Inquirers will identify and research issues and questions to develop knowledge or solutions. Inquiry-based learning includes problem-based learning, and is generally used in small-scale investigations and projects, as well as research. The inquiry-based instruction is principally very closely related to the development and practice of thinking and problem-solving skills.

Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning may have different meanings depending on the context in which it is applied. Mobile CSCL includes any in-class and out-of-class use of handheld mobile devices such as cell phones, smart phones, and personal digital assistants (PDAs) to enable collaborative learning.

The Lillian McDermott Medal, established in 2021, is awarded annually by the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). Named after Lillian Christie McDermott, the Medal "recognizes those who are passionate and tenacious about improving the teaching and learning of physics and have made intellectually creative contributions in this area".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flipped classroom</span> Instructional strategy and a type of blended learning

A flipped classroom is an instructional strategy and a type of blended learning. It aims to increase student engagement and learning by having pupils complete readings at home, and work on live problem-solving during class time. This pedagogical style moves activities, including those that may have traditionally been considered homework, into the classroom. With a flipped classroom, students watch online lectures, collaborate in online discussions, or carry out research at home, while actively engaging concepts in the classroom with a mentor's guidance.

One of the most visible approaches to peer learning comes out of cognitive psychology, and is applied within a "mainstream" educational framework: "Peer learning is an educational practice in which students interact with other students to attain educational goals." Other authors including David Boud describe peer learning as a way of moving beyond independent to interdependent or mutual learning among peers. In this context, it can be compared to the practices that go by the name cooperative learning. However, other contemporary views on peer learning relax the constraints, and position "peer-to-peer learning" as a mode of "learning for everyone, by everyone, about almost anything." Whether it takes place in a formal or informal learning context, in small groups or online, peer learning manifests aspects of self-organization that are mostly absent from pedagogical models of teaching and learning.

Physics education research (PER) is a form of discipline-based education research specifically related to the study of the teaching and learning of physics, often with the aim of improving the effectiveness of student learning. PER draws from other disciplines, such as sociology, cognitive science, education and linguistics, and complements them by reflecting the disciplinary knowledge and practices of physics. Approximately eighty-five institutions in the United States conduct research in science and physics education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Passive learning</span> Learning method

Passive learning is a teaching method where students receive information from the instructor and internalize it. It is a method "where the learner receives no feedback from the instructor". The term is often used together with direct instruction and lecturing, with passive learning being the result or intended outcome of the instruction. This style of learning is teacher-centered and contrasts to active learning, which is student-centered, whereby students take an active or participatory role in the learning process, and to the Socratic method where students and instructors engage in cooperative argumentative dialogue. Passive learning is a traditional method utilized in factory model schools and modern schools, as well as historic and contemporary religious services in churches (sermons), mosques, and synagogues.

Conceptual questions or conceptual problems in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education are questions that can be answered based only on the knowledge of relevant concepts, rather than performing extensive calculations. They contrast with most homework and exam problems in science and engineering that typically require plugging in numerical values into previously discussed formulas. Such "plug-and-chug" numerical problems can often be solved correctly by just matching the pattern of the problem to a previously discussed problem and changing the numerical inputs, which requires significant amounts of time to perform the calculations but does not test or deepen the understanding of how the concepts and formulas should work together. Conceptual questions, therefore, provide a good complement to conventional numerical problems because they need minimal or no calculations and instead encourage the students to engage more deeply with the underlying concepts and how they relate to formulas.

References

  1. ↑ "Confessions of a Converted Lecturer: Eric Mazur - YouTube". www.youtube.com.
  2. 1 2 "Eric Mazur (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual Series in Educational Innovation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ". Archived from the original on October 9, 2011.
  3. ↑ Peer Instruction Network, co-founded by Eric Mazur and Julie Schell, a global social network for educators interested in peer instruction
  4. ↑ Turn to Your Neighbor, the official blog of peer instruction, containing numerous articles on implementation, resources, and use
  5. ↑ The PER User's Guide, an implementation guide and numerous resources on peer instruction
  6. ↑ G. Novak et al., (1999). Just-in-Time teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ [ ISBN missing ]
  7. ↑ Turpen, Chandra; Finkelstein, Noah D. (2010). "The construction of different classroom norms during Peer Instruction: Students perceive differences". Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 6 (2): 020123. Bibcode:2010PRPER...6b0123T. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020123 . ISSN   1554-9178.
  8. ↑ Crouch, Catherine H.; Mazur, Eric (2001). "Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results". American Journal of Physics. 69 (9): 970–977. Bibcode:2001AmJPh..69..970C. doi:10.1119/1.1374249. ISSN   0002-9505. S2CID   1893994.
  9. ↑ Vickrey, Trisha; Rosploch, Kaitlyn; Rahmanian, Reihaneh; Pilarz, Matthew; Stains, Marilyne (2 March 2015). "Research-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction: A Literature Review". CBE—Life Sciences Education. 14 (1): es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-11-0198 . ISSN   1931-7913. PMC   4353089 . PMID   25713095.
  10. ↑ Mohammad, Milan; Viuff, Søren Lundgaard; Munch, Marie Warrer; Berg, Ronan M. G. (1 December 2021). "Peer instruction versus conventional group work-based teaching in a laboratory exercise on respiratory physiology: a randomized study". Advances in Physiology Education. 45 (4): 694–701. doi: 10.1152/advan.00045.2021 . ISSN   1043-4046.
  11. ↑ Fagen, Adam P.; Crouch, Catherine H.; Mazur, Eric (2002). "Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms". The Physics Teacher. 40 (4): 206–209. Bibcode:2002PhTea..40..206F. doi:10.1119/1.1474140. ISSN   0031-921X.
  12. ↑ Lasry, Nathaniel; Mazur, Eric; Watkins, Jessica (2008). "Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college" (PDF). American Journal of Physics. 76 (11): 1066–1069. Bibcode:2008AmJPh..76.1066L. doi:10.1119/1.2978182. ISSN   0002-9505. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-12-16.
  13. ↑ Suppapittayaporn, Decha; Emarat, Narumon; Arayathanitkul, Kwan (2010). "The effectiveness of peer instruction and structured inquiry on conceptual understanding of force and motion: a case study from Thailand". Research in Science & Technological Education. 28 (1): 63–79. Bibcode:2010RSTEd..28...63S. doi:10.1080/02635140903513573. ISSN   0263-5143. S2CID   144825974.
  14. 1 2 Nicol, David J.; Boyle, James T. (2003). "Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom" (PDF). Studies in Higher Education. 28 (4): 457–473. doi:10.1080/0307507032000122297. ISSN   0307-5079. S2CID   146635704.
  15. ↑ Butchart, Sam; Handfield, Toby; Restall, Greg (2009). "Using Peer Instruction to Teach Philosophy, Logic, and Critical Thinking". Teaching Philosophy. 32 (1): 1–40. doi:10.5840/teachphil20093212. ISSN   0145-5788.
  16. ↑ S.L. Chew. (2004). Using concepTests for formative assessment, Psychology Teacher Network, v14, n1, 10-12
  17. ↑ McConnell, David A.; Steer, David N.; Owens, Kathie D. (2018). "Assessment and Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Geology Courses". Journal of Geoscience Education. 51 (2): 205–216. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-51.2.205. ISSN   1089-9995. S2CID   12084444.
  18. ↑ Pilzer, Scott (2001). "Peer instruction in Physics and Mathematics". Primus. 11 (2): 185–192. doi:10.1080/10511970108965987. ISSN   1051-1970. S2CID   123000151.
  19. ↑ Simon, Beth; Kohanfars, Michael; Lee, Jeff; Tamayo, Karen; Cutts, Quintin (2010). "Experience report". Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. pp. 341–345. doi:10.1145/1734263.1734381. ISBN   9781450300063. S2CID   26331131.
  20. ↑ Porter, Leo; Bouvier, Dennis; Cutts, Quintin; Grissom, Scott; Lee, Cynthia; McCartney, Robert; Zingaro, Daniel; Simon, Beth (2016). "A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing". Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. pp. 358–363. doi: 10.1145/2839509.2844642 . ISBN   9781450336857. S2CID   6729335.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.