Spacecraft detumbling

Last updated
Tumbling simulation of Tiangong-1 approaching reentry

Spacecraft detumbling is the process of reducing or eliminating unwanted angular velocity (tumbling) of a spacecraft following launcher separation or an external perturbation. Detumbling is the first task to be performed by the spacecraft's attitude control system and it is therefore critical to ensure safe satellite operations, enabling reliable communication, solar power generation, navigation, and the subsequent nominal mission. [1] [2]

Contents

In order to minimize the risk of failure during this process, stringent requirements on the reliability of the involved actuators and sensors and on the simplicity of the adopted control algorithm are usually driving the design of the detumbling. [2] [3]

Spacecraft detumbling techniques can also be applied to the handling and removal of space debris. [4]

History

Early efforts investigating detumbling strategies focused on passive methods like magnetic damping [5] and gravity-gradient stabilization. [6] Modern satellites typically employ an active detumbling control, either purely magnetic or including additional actuators, such as reaction wheels or thrusters. [2] [7] [8] Current efforts in detumbling research focus on advanced control for underactuated systems [9] or the integration of machine learning to improve detumbling performance. [10]

Common detumbling strategies

Magnetic control

The basic magnetic attitude control system is composed of magnetorquers as actuators and magnetometers as sensing elements. [11] A fully-magnetic attitude control system is currently implemented in several space missions, especially for smaller classes of satellites. Magnetic rods and magnetometers are selected for their reliability, low mass and energy efficiency advantages. [12]

Magnetorquers are able to control the satellite through electromagnetic interaction between the generated magnetic moment and the external magnetic field: [11]

where is the torque acting on the satellite, is Earth's magnetic field, and is the torquer magnetic moment. The cross product reveals a limitation of magnetic control: the control torque cannot be applied along any possible direction but only its projection on the plane orthogonal to  is available. The system under control is consequently underactuated. [11]

Magnetic control: B-dot

Currently, the most widely used strategy for spacecraft detumbling employs a magnetic control algorithm called B-dot. [2] The resulting control architecture has proven reliable, simple and easy to implement, establishing the baseline against which new detumbling strategies are evaluated. [12]

The B-dot control law is based on the rate of change of magnetic field measurements: [12]

where is the commanded torquer magnetic moment, is the controller gain and is the rate of change of the measured magnetic field. The magnetic field derivative is used as a coarse estimate of the spacecraft angular velocity. Because of this underlying assumption, the B-dot controller suffers performance degradation when the spacecraft angular velocity is low, which is usually the case when the spacecraft is close to being fully detumbled, or if the initial angular velocity is small. [12]

Magnetic control: beyond the B-dot

Over the years, a number of magnetic controllers beyond the classic B-dot have been investigated. The drivers for this research span from power saving, [12] improving the convergence rate and solution robustness, [2] [13] or trying to overcome the inherently underactuated nature of magnetic control. [3] [14]

Flywheel-based control

Spacecraft detumbling using momentum-exchange flywheel-based devices like reaction wheels or control moment gyros can significantly shorten detumbling times, thus helping reduce mass and volume of the power system, due to the much larger torque available from non-magnetic actuators. Furthermore, flywheel-based control can help overcome the underactuation problem typical of magnetic-only control. [7] [15]

However, as these devices exploit the principle of conservation of angular momentum to control the spacecraft, the flywheels' angular momentum builds up over time. Therefore, momentum-exchange devices must be employed together with an additional actuator that removes the flywheels' accumulated momentum without affecting the satellite attitude. This process is known as momentum dumping, and is typically realized through magnetorquers or thrusters. [7]

Thruster-based control

Similarly to flywheel-based control, thrusters can be used during the detumbling phase for missions characterized by demanding power or torque requirements. [16]

Furthermore, as Earth's magnetic field intensity decreases with altitude, there exists a practical boundary to the use of magnetic control due to degraded magnetorquer efficiency. This boundary is set to low Earth Orbit (LEO), below an altitude of 2,000 km. [17] Beyond LEO, thrusters can be employed for detumbling purposes. However, the use of thrusters is in general limited by the mass and propellant capacity of the thruster system. [8]

Mass redistribution

Spacecraft detumbling can be performed through a movable-mass control device that is internal to the spacecraft and can move along a fixed direction track. The physical principle behind this strategy consists in controlling the mass distribution such that the system angular kinetic energy decreases over time. [18]

Animation showing a PAM-D with the Phoenix spacecraft. The stage is successively spun, fired, yo-yo de-spun and jettisoned.

The performance of the control system can be improved through larger mass amplitudes along the track or larger mass sizes. In this approach, the location and displacement amplitude of any internal control mass is limited by the physical dimensions of the spacecraft. [19]

Externally movable appendages solve this limitation and allow for a greater range of location and displacement amplitudes. However, as the size of the appendages increases, flexibility problems associated with such structures have to be considered. One example of this strategy is the so-called yo-yo de-spin. [20]

Applications and ongoing development

Space debris mitigation

The increasing number of space debris in recent years led to the development of several detumbling techniques for uncontrolled satellites or generic uncooperative object. [21] [22] [23] [24] According to the specific interaction between the active satellite responsible for the debris handling (chaser) and the uncooperative object (target), detumbling strategies can be separated into contact-based and contactless approaches. [25]

Contact-based strategies require a physical connection between target and chaser. This connection can be a rigid link, such as a robotic arm [22] or a flexible link, like a harpoon. [26] Contactless strategies, instead, employ detumbling approaches that do not require a physical connection between target and chaser, for example eddy currents, [21] plume impingement [27] or lasers. [24]

Underactuation

Advanced control techniques including model predictive control have recently been employed to design detumbling techniques for underactuated systems, such as spacecraft using a single magnetorquer. [9]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Aghili, Farhad (September–October 2009). "Time-Optimal Detumbling Control of Spacecraft" . Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 32 (5): 1671–1675. Bibcode:2009JGCD...32.1671A. doi:10.2514/1.43189. ISSN   0731-5090.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Invernizzi, Davide; Lovera, Marco (March 2020). "A projection-based controller for fast spacecraft detumbling using magnetic actuation". Automatica. 113 108779. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108779. hdl: 11311/1129338 . ISSN   0005-1098.
  3. 1 2 Lovera, Marco (July 2015). Magnetic satellite detumbling: The b-dot algorithm revisited. 2015 American Control Conference (ACC). Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ACC.2015.7171005.
  4. ↑ Caubet, Albert; Biggs, James D. (March 2014). Design of an Attitude Stabilization Electromagnetic module for detumbling uncooperative targets. 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, USA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/AERO.2014.6836325.
  5. ↑ Fischell, Robert E. (September 1961). "Magnetic Damping of the Angular Motions of Earth Satellites" . ARS Journal. 31 (9): 1210–1217. doi:10.2514/8.5759.
  6. ↑ Fischell, R. E.; Mobley, F. F. (March 1970). "Gravity-Gradient Stabilization Studies with the Dodge Satellite" . IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 3rd International IFAC Conference on Automatic Control in Space, Toulouse, France, March 2-6, 1970. 3 (1): 639–654. doi:10.1016/S1474-6670(17)68816-5. ISSN   1474-6670.
  7. 1 2 3 Lin, Yiing-Yuh; Wang, Chin-Tzuo (January 2014). "Detumbling of a rigid spacecraft via torque wheel assisted gyroscopic motion" . Acta Astronautica. 93: 1–12. Bibcode:2014AcAau..93....1L. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.06.021. ISSN   0094-5765.
  8. 1 2 Biggs, James D.; Fournier, Hugo; Ceccherini, Simone; Topputo, Francesco (April 2019). Optimal de-tumbling of spacecraft with four thrusters conference. 2019 CEAS EuroGNC. Milan,Italy.
  9. 1 2 Kondo, Kota; Yoshimura, Yasuhiro; Bando, Mai; Nagasaki, Shuji; Hanada, Toshiya (January 2024), "Model Predictive Approach for Detumbling an Underactuated Satellite", AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, arXiv: 2401.11539 , doi:10.2514/6.2020-1433, ISBN   978-1-62410-595-1 , retrieved 2025-07-09
  10. ↑ Cui, Yucheng; Xi, Zhiyu (November 2020). Intelligent Detumbling Control for a Micro-Satellite with Bounded Inputs. 7th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA). Xi'an, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/DSA51864.2020.00054.
  11. 1 2 3 Ovchinnikov, M. Yu.; Roldugin, D. S. (August 2019). "A survey on active magnetic attitude control algorithms for small satellites" . Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 109 100546. Bibcode:2019PrAeS.10900546O. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.006. ISSN   0376-0421.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Desouky, Mohammed A. A.; Abdelkhalik, Ossama (June 2020). "A new variant of the B-dot control for spacecraft magnetic detumbling" . Acta Astronautica. 171: 14–22. Bibcode:2020AcAau.171...14D. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.02.030. ISSN   0094-5765.
  13. ↑ Avanzini, Giulio; Giulietti, Fabrizio (July–August 2012). "Magnetic Detumbling of a Rigid Spacecraft" . Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 35 (4): 1326–1334. Bibcode:2012JGCD...35.1326A. doi:10.2514/1.53074. ISSN   0731-5090.
  14. ↑ Willis, Jacob B.; Fisch, Paulo R. M.; Seletskiy, Aleksei; Manchester, Zachary (July 2024), Building a Better B-Dot: Fast Detumbling with Non-Monotonic Lyapunov Functions, arXiv: 2407.02724 , retrieved 2025-07-08
  15. ↑ Lee, Byeong-Hun;Choe, Jeong-Won;Jang, Yeong-Geun;Yun, Mi-Yeon (May 2006). "Rapid Initial Detumbling Strategy for Micro/Nanosatellite with Pitch Bias Momentum System". Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences. 34 (5): 65–73. doi:10.5139/JKSAS.2006.34.5.065. ISSN   1225-1348. Archived from the original on 2024-06-03.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ↑ Weidong, Huang; Yulin, Zhang (July 2004). "Rate damping control for small satellite using thruster" . Acta Astronautica. 55 (1): 9–13. Bibcode:2004AcAau..55....9W. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2003.12.013. ISSN   0094-5765.
  17. ↑ Allen, Christopher S.; Giraudo, Martina; Moratto, Claudio; Yamaguchi, Nobuyasu (2018), Sgobba, Tommaso; Kanki, Barbara; Clervoy, Jean-François; Sandal, Gro Mjeldheim (eds.), "Chapter 4 - Spaceflight environment", Space Safety and Human Performance, Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 87–138, ISBN   978-0-08-101869-9 , retrieved 2025-07-08
  18. ↑ Kaplan, M. H. (October 1973). Techniques for detumbling a disabled space base. International Astronautical Congress. Baku, Azerbaidzhan SSR.
  19. ↑ Edwards, T. L.; Kaplan, M. H. (April 1974). "Automatic spacecraft detumbling by internal mass motion". AIAA Journal. 12 (4): 496. Bibcode:1974AIAAJ..12..496E. doi:10.2514/3.49275.
  20. ↑ Bainum, Peter M.; Sellappan, R. (November–December 1976). "Spacecraft detumbling using movable telescoping appendages". Acta Astronautica. 3 (11): 953–969. Bibcode:1976AcAau...3..953B. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(76)90005-9. hdl: 2060/19750016750 . ISSN   0094-5765.
  21. 1 2 Sugai, Fumihito; Abiko, Satoko; Tsujita, Teppei; Jiang, Xin; Uchiyama, Masaru (November 2013). Detumbling an uncontrolled satellite with contactless force by using an eddy current brake. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IROS.2013.6696440.
  22. 1 2 Han, Dong; Dong, Gangqi; Huang, Panfeng; Ma, Zhiqing (September 2022). "Capture and detumbling control for active debris removal by a dual-arm space robot". Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 35 (9): 342–353. Bibcode:2022ChJAn..35i.342H. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2021.10.008 . ISSN   1000-9361.
  23. ↑ Wang, Xinglong; Zhou, Zhicheng; Chen, Yujun; Chen, Shiming (August 2020). "Optimal contact control for space debris detumbling and nutation damping" . Advances in Space Research. 66 (4): 951–962. Bibcode:2020AdSpR..66..951W. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.043. ISSN   0273-1177.
  24. 1 2 Vetrisano, Massimo; Thiry, Nicolas; Vasile, Massimiliano (March 2015). Detumbling large space debris via laser ablation. 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, USA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/AERO.2015.7119051.
  25. ↑ Ledkov, Alexander; Aslanov, Vladimir (October 2022). "Review of contact and contactless active space debris removal approaches" . Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 134 100858. Bibcode:2022PrAeS.13400858L. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100858. ISSN   0376-0421.
  26. ↑ Sizov, Dmitry A.; Aslanov, Vladimir S. (April 2021). "Space Debris Removal with Harpoon Assistance: Choice of Parameters and Optimization" . Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 44 (4): 767–778. Bibcode:2021JGCD...44..767S. doi:10.2514/1.G005484. ISSN   0731-5090.
  27. ↑ Aslanov, Vladimir; Ledkov, Alexander (January 2022). "Detumbling of axisymmetric space debris during transportation by ion beam shepherd in 3D case" . Advances in Space Research. 69 (1): 570–580. Bibcode:2022AdSpR..69..570A. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.002. ISSN   0273-1177.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.