Supertaster

Last updated

A supertaster is a person whose sense of taste is of far greater intensity than the average person, having an elevated taste response. [1]

Contents

History

The term originated with experimental psychologist Linda Bartoshuk, who has spent much of her career studying genetic variation in taste perception. In the early 1980s, Bartoshuk and her colleagues found that some individuals tested in the laboratory seemed to have an elevated taste response and called them supertasters. [2]

This increased taste response is not the result of response bias or a scaling artifact but appears to have an anatomical or biological basis.

Phenylthiocarbamide

In 1931, Arthur L. Fox, a DuPont chemist, discovered that some people found phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) to be bitter while others found it tasteless. [3] [4] At the 1931 American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting, Fox collaborated with Albert F. Blakeslee, a geneticist, to have attendees taste PTC: 65% found it bitter, 28% found it tasteless, and 6% described other taste qualities. Subsequent work revealed that the ability to taste PTC is genetic.[ citation needed ]

Propylthiouracil

In the 1960s, Roland Fischer was the first to link the ability to taste PTC, and the related compound propylthiouracil (PROP), to food preference, diets, and calorie intake. [5] Today, PROP has replaced PTC for research because of a faint sulfurous odor and safety concerns with PTC. [6] Bartoshuk and colleagues discovered that the taster group could be further divided into medium tasters and supertasters. [7] Research suggests 25% of the population are non-tasters, [8] 50% are medium tasters, and 25% are supertasters. [9]

Cause

The exact cause of heightened response to taste in humans has yet to be elucidated. A review found associations between supertasters and the presence of the TAS2R38 gene, the ability to taste PROP and PTC, and an increased number of fungiform papillae. [10]

In addition, environmental causes may play a role in sensitive taste. The exact mechanisms by which these causes may manifest, as well as possible evolutionary advantages to elevated taste sensitivity, are still unknown. [11] [12] In some environments, a heightened taste response, particularly to bitterness, would represent an important advantage in avoiding potentially toxic plant alkaloids. However, an increased response to bitterness may limit approach behavior for various palatable foods.

TAS2R38

The bitter-taste-receptor gene TAS2R38 has been associated with the ability to taste PROP [13] and PTC, [14] although a causal relationship with the supertaster phenomenon has not been established. [15] Additionally, the T2R38 genotype has been linked to a preference for sweetness in children, [16] avoidance of alcoholic beverages, [13] increased prevalence of colon cancer (because of inadequate vegetable consumption), [17] and avoidance of cigarette smoking. [18]

Prevalence

Women

Women are more likely to be supertasters, as are those from Asia, South America, and Africa. [8] Female supertasters tend to have a lower body mass index and better cardiovascular health. This could be because supertasters may not have a high predilection for sweet or high-fat foods compared to the average person. [19]

Identification

The tongue's fungiform papillae can be revealed with blue food dye.

Supertasters were initially identified based on the perceived intensity of propylthiouracil (PROP) compared to a reference salt solution. Supertasters consume more salt in comparison to those with average taste. [20] Subsequently, salt has been replaced with a non-oral gustatory standard. Therefore, if two individuals rate the same gustatory stimulus at a comparable perceptual intensity, but one gives a rating twice as large for the bitterness of a PROP solution, the experimenter can be confident the difference is real and not merely the result of how the person is using the scale.[ citation needed ] Today, a phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) test strip is used to help determine if someone is a low taster. The general population tastes this as bitter about 75% of the time. [21]

Many studies do not include a cross-modal reference and categorize individuals based on the bitterness of a concentrated PROP solution [22] [23] or PROP-impregnated paper. [24] Supertasters tend to have more fungiform papillae and pain receptors than tasters and non-tasters. [25] It is also possible to make a reasonably accurate self-diagnosis at home by carefully examining the tongue and looking for the number of fungiform papillae. [26]

Specific food sensitivities

Although individual food preferences for supertasters cannot be typified, documented examples for either lessened preference or consumption include:

Other foods may also show altered patterns of preference and consumption, but only indirect evidence exists:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taste bud</span> Taste receptor cells

Taste buds are clusters of taste receptor cells, which are also known as gustatory cells. The taste receptors are located around the small structures known as papillae found on the upper surface of the tongue, soft palate, upper esophagus, the cheek, and epiglottis. These structures are involved in detecting the five elements of taste perception: saltiness, sourness, bitterness, sweetness and savoriness (umami). A popular myth assigns these different tastes to different regions of the tongue; in fact, these tastes can be detected by any area of the tongue. Via small openings in the tongue epithelium, called taste pores, parts of the food dissolved in saliva come into contact with the taste receptors. These are located on top of the taste receptor cells that constitute the taste buds. The taste receptor cells send information detected by clusters of various receptors and ion channels to the gustatory areas of the brain via the seventh, ninth and tenth cranial nerves.

Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC), also known as phenylthiourea (PTU), is an organosulfur thiourea containing a phenyl ring.

<i>Brassica oleracea</i> Species of plant

Brassica oleracea is a plant species from family Brassicaceae that includes many common cultivars used as vegetables, such as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, kale, Brussels sprouts, collard greens, Savoy cabbage, kohlrabi, and gai lan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Propylthiouracil</span> Medication used to treat hyperthyroidism

Propylthiouracil (PTU) is a medication used to treat hyperthyroidism. This includes hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease and toxic multinodular goiter. In a thyrotoxic crisis it is generally more effective than methimazole. Otherwise it is typically only used when methimazole, surgery, and radioactive iodine is not possible. It is taken by mouth.

Aftertaste is the taste intensity of a food or beverage that is perceived immediately after that food or beverage is removed from the mouth. The aftertastes of different foods and beverages can vary by intensity and over time, but the unifying feature of aftertaste is that it is perceived after a food or beverage is either swallowed or spat out. The neurobiological mechanisms of taste signal transduction from the taste receptors in the mouth to the brain have not yet been fully understood. However, the primary taste processing area located in the insula has been observed to be involved in aftertaste perception.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TAS2R16</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

TAS2R16 is a bitter taste receptor and one of the 25 TAS2Rs. TAS2Rs are receptors that belong to the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) family. These receptors detect various bitter substances found in nature as agonists, and get stimulated. TAS2R16 receptor is mainly expressed within taste buds present on the surface of the tongue and palate epithelium. TAS2R16 is activated by bitter β-glucopyranosides

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taste receptor</span> Type of cellular receptor that facilitates taste

A taste receptor or tastant is a type of cellular receptor which facilitates the sensation of taste. When food or other substances enter the mouth, molecules interact with saliva and are bound to taste receptors in the oral cavity and other locations. Molecules which give a sensation of taste are considered "sapid".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TAS2R38</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Taste receptor 2 member 38 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the TAS2R38 gene. TAS2R38 is a bitter taste receptor; varying genotypes of TAS2R38 influence the ability to taste both 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide (PTC). Though it has often been proposed that varying taste receptor genotypes could influence tasting ability, TAS2R38 is one of the few taste receptors shown to have this function.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gustducin</span> G protein

Gustducin is a G protein associated with taste and the gustatory system, found in some taste receptor cells. Research on the discovery and isolation of gustducin is recent. It is known to play a large role in the transduction of bitter, sweet and umami stimuli. Its pathways are many and diverse.

Danielle Renee Reed is an American geneticist employed at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She is most notable for her papers regarding genetic variation in taste and obesity in mice and humans.

An acquired taste is an appreciation for something unlikely to be enjoyed by a person who has not had substantial exposure to it. It is the opposite of innate taste, which is the appreciation for things that are enjoyable by most people without prior exposure to them.

Dr. Alexander Bachmanov studied veterinary medicine at the Saint Petersburg Veterinary Institute, Russia (1977-1982), received his Ph.D. in biological sciences from the Pavlov Institute of Physiology in Saint Petersburg, Russia in 1990. He completed postdoctoral fellowships at the Physiological Laboratory at Cambridge University in 1993 and at the Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the United States from 1994 to 1997. He later joined Monnell's faculty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TAS2R1</span> Member of the 25 known human bitter taste receptors

Taste receptor type 2 member 1 (TAS2R1/T2R1) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the TAS2R1 gene. It belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and is related to class A-like GPCRs, they contain 7 transmembrane helix bundles and short N-terminus loop. Furthermore, TAS2R1 is member of the 25 known human bitter taste receptors, which enable the perception of bitter taste in the mouth cavity. Increasing evidence indicates a functional role of TAS2Rs in extra-oral tissues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TAS1R1</span> Protein

Taste receptor type 1 member 1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the TAS1R1 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TAS1R3</span> Mammalian protein found in Homo sapiens

Taste receptor type 1 member 3 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the TAS1R3 gene. The TAS1R3 gene encodes the human homolog of mouse Sac taste receptor, a major determinant of differences between sweet-sensitive and -insensitive mouse strains in their responsiveness to sucrose, saccharin, and other sweeteners.

Dr. Michael G. Tordoff is a psychobiologist working at the Monell Chemical Senses Center. His research deals with the genetics and physiology of taste and nutrition. His early work addressed (a) how and what animals learn about the value of their food, (b) how artificial sweeteners influence appetite and body weight, (c) how salt intake is regulated, and (d) how dietary calcium influences salt intake. Recently, he has been investigating calcium taste and appetite. He is the primary proponent of the notion that calcium is a basic taste, equivalent to sweet, sour, salty, and bitter.

Linda May Bartoshuk is an American psychologist. She is a Presidential Endowed Professor of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science at the University of Florida. She is an internationally known researcher specializing in the chemical senses of taste and smell, having discovered that some people are supertasters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taste</span> Sense of chemicals on the tongue

The gustatory system or sense of taste is the sensory system that is partially responsible for the perception of taste (flavor). Taste is the perception stimulated when a substance in the mouth reacts chemically with taste receptor cells located on taste buds in the oral cavity, mostly on the tongue. Taste, along with the sense of smell and trigeminal nerve stimulation, determines flavors of food and other substances. Humans have taste receptors on taste buds and other areas, including the upper surface of the tongue and the epiglottis. The gustatory cortex is responsible for the perception of taste.

A taster is a person, by means of a human genotype, who is able to taste phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and its derivative 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). PTC tastes bitter to many people (tasters) but is tasteless to others (non-tasters).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PTC tasting</span>

PTC tasting is a classic genetic marker in human population genetics investigations.

References

  1. Hayes JE, Keast RS (October 2011). "Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?". Physiology & Behavior. 104 (5): 1072–1074. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.003. PMC   3183330 . PMID   21851828.
  2. Bartoshuk LM (1991). "Sweetness: history, preference, and genetic variability". Food Technology. 45 (11): 108–13. ISSN   0015-6639. INIST   5536670.
  3. Fox AL (1931). "Six in ten 'tasteblind' to bitter chemical". The Science News-Letter. 9: 249.[ verification needed ]
  4. Bartoshuk LM (February 2000). "Psychophysical advances aid the study of genetic variation in taste". Appetite. 34 (1): 105. doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0287. PMID   10744897. S2CID   30300307.
  5. Tepper BJ, Banni S, Melis M, Crnjar R, Tomassini Barbarossa I (August 2014). "Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and its association with physiological mechanisms controlling body mass index (BMI)". Nutrients. 6 (9): 3363–3381. doi: 10.3390/nu6093363 . PMC   4179166 . PMID   25166026.
  6. Texley J, Kwan T, Summers J (1 January 2004). Investigating Safely: A Guide for High School Teachers. NSTA Press. pp. 90–. ISBN   978-0-87355-202-8.
  7. Di Lorenzo PM, Youngentob SL (15 April 2003). "Olfaction and Taste". Handbook of Psychology: 269–297. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0310. ISBN   0471264385.
  8. 1 2 "BBC - Science & Nature - Human Body and Mind - Science of supertasters". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
  9. Roxby P (9 December 2012). "Why taste is all in the senses". BBC News Health.
  10. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Miller IJ (December 1994). "PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects". Physiology & Behavior. 56 (6): 1165–1171. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90361-1 . PMID   7878086. S2CID   40598794.
  11. Navarro-Allende A, Khataan N, El-Sohemy A (16 September 2008). "Impact of genetic and environmental determinants of taste with food preferences in older adults". Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly. 27 (3–4): 267–276. doi:10.1080/01639360802261920. PMID   19042575. S2CID   44506616.
  12. "Myths of Human Genetics: PTC tasting". udel.edu.
  13. 1 2 Duffy VB, Davidson AC, Kidd JR, Kidd KK, Speed WC, Pakstis AJ, et al. (November 2004). "Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake". Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 28 (11): 1629–1637. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000145789.55183.D4. PMC   1397913 . PMID   15547448.
  14. Bufe B, Breslin PA, Kuhn C, Reed DR, Tharp CD, Slack JP, et al. (February 2005). "The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception". Current Biology. 15 (4): 322–327. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.047. PMC   1400547 . PMID   15723792.
  15. Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Kidd JR, Duffy VB (March 2008). "Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene". Chemical Senses. 33 (3): 255–265. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm084 . PMID   18209019.
  16. Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Reed DR (February 2005). "Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences". Pediatrics. 115 (2): e216–e222. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1582. PMC   1397914 . PMID   15687429.
  17. Basson MD, Bartoshuk LM, Dichello SZ, Panzini L, Weiffenbach JM, Duffy VB (March 2005). "Association between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and colonic neoplasms". Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 50 (3): 483–489. doi:10.1007/s10620-005-2462-7. PMID   15810630. S2CID   21099629.
  18. Cannon DS, Baker TB, Piper ME, Scholand MB, Lawrence DL, Drayna DT, et al. (December 2005). "Associations between phenylthiocarbamide gene polymorphisms and cigarette smoking". Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 7 (6): 853–858. doi: 10.1080/14622200500330209 . PMID   16298720.
  19. 1 2 Crosby G (2016-05-31). "Super-Tasters and Non-Tasters: Is it Better to Be Average?". The Nutrition Source. Harvard University. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  20. Knox R (16 June 2010). "For Supertasters, A Desire For Salt Is Genetic". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  21. "PTC The Genetics of Bitter Taste". learn.genetics.utah.edu.
  22. Prescott J, Ripandelli N, Wakeling I (October 2001). "Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters". Chemical Senses. 26 (8): 993–1003. doi: 10.1093/chemse/26.8.993 . PMID   11595676.
  23. 1 2 Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (January 2005). "Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates". Physiology & Behavior. 83 (5): 821–831. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.10.004. PMID   15639168. S2CID   40244872.
  24. Sipiora ML, Murtaugh MA, Gregoire MB, Duffy VB (May 2000). "Bitter taste perception and severe vomiting in pregnancy". Physiology & Behavior. 69 (3): 259–267. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00223-7. PMID   10869591. S2CID   26518676.
  25. "Super-Tasters and Non-Tasters: Is it Better to Be Average?". The Nutrition Source. May 31, 2016. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  26. "Super-Tasting Science: Find Out If You're a "Supertaster"!". Science Buddies. Scientific American. December 27, 2012. Retrieved 2021-07-18.
  27. 1 2 3 Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Levine A, Hann C (December 1999). "Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women". Public Health Nutrition. 2 (4): 513–519. doi: 10.1017/S1368980099000695 . PMID   10656470.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Barratt-Fornell A (April 2001). "Genetic taste markers and food preferences". Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 29 (4 Pt 2): 535–538. PMID   11259346.
  29. 1 2 Dinehart ME, Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Lanier SL, Duffy VB (February 2006). "Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake". Physiology & Behavior. 87 (2): 304–313. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.018. PMID   16368118. S2CID   24387624.
  30. Sandell MA, Breslin PA (September 2006). "Variability in a taste-receptor gene determines whether we taste toxins in food". Current Biology. 16 (18): R792–R794. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.049 . PMID   16979544.
  31. Swan N (7 January 1998). "Health Report – 22/12/1997: Super Tasters". ABC More. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2013-08-29.
  32. Gardner A (16 June 2010). "Love Salt? You Might Be a "Supertaster"". Health.com. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 2014-12-09.

Further reading