Author | Elizabeth Warren Amelia Warren Tyagi |
---|---|
Subject | Household income in the United States, personal bankruptcy, personal finance |
Genre | non-fiction |
Publisher | Basic Books |
Publication date | 2004 |
Publication place | US |
Pages | 255 |
ISBN | 978-0-465-09082-2 |
Website | Basic Books |
The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke is a 2004 popular nonfiction book by Elizabeth Warren and her daughter Amelia Warren Tyagi. The book examines the causes of increasing rates of personal bankruptcy and economic insecurity in American households. It was reissued in 2016. [1]
At the time of publication, Elizabeth Warren was a professor of commercial law at Harvard University, specializing in bankruptcy law. [2] Her earlier writing was primarily aimed at academic audiences. [3] [4] She was considered a leading figure in the then-active debate over personal bankruptcy law, in which she argued for generous access to bankruptcy protection. [4] She would later enter politics, campaigning successfully for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, before being elected US Senator from the state of Massachusetts. [4]
Amelia Warren Tyagi is a management consultant formerly with McKinsey & Company. [5] She holds a Master of Business Administration from The Wharton School. [2] [4]
The authors present quantitative data to demonstrate how American middle-class families have been left in a precarious financial position by increases in fixed living expenses, increased medical expenses, escalating real estate prices, lower employment security, and the relaxation of credit regulation. [2] [6] The result has been a reshaping of the American labor force, such that many families now rely on having two incomes in order to meet their expenses. [2] This situation represents a greater level of financial risk than that faced by single-income households: the inability of either adult to work, even temporarily, may result in loss of employment, and concomitant loss of medical coverage and the ability to pay bills. [6] [4] This may lead to bankruptcy or being forced to move somewhere less expensive, with associated decreases in educational quality and economic opportunity. [2]
Among the expenses driving the two-income trap are child care, housing in areas with good schools, and college tuition. Warren and Tyagi conclude that having children is the "single best predictor" that a woman will go bankrupt. [7]
Warren and Tyagi call stay-at-home mothers of past generations "the most important part of the safety net", as the non-working mother could step in to earn extra income or care for sick family members when needed. [3] However, Warren and Tyagi dismiss the idea of return to stay-at-home parents, and instead propose policies to offset the loss of this form of insurance. [6]
Warren and Tyagi attempt to overturn the "overconsumption myth" that Americans' financial instabilities are the result of frivolous spending [4] – they note, for instance, that families are spending less on clothing, food (including meals out), and large appliances, when adjusted for inflation, than a generation prior. [8] They also note that dual-income households have less discretionary money than single-income households a generation prior. [6]
The authors propose several solutions to the "two-income trap". In order to decouple educational opportunity from real estate location, they propose allowing families to choose among public schools in their district, with a voucher system. [6] They recommend tuition freezes for public universities, which have seen tuitions rise three times faster than inflation. [6] They endorse universal preschool as a means of reducing fixed costs for families with children. [6] Warren and Tyagi take care to consider possible perverse consequences of various social programs aimed at middle-class economic relief. [4]
Warren and Tyagi also call for the restoration of "usury laws" limiting credit interest rates, and increased disclosure requirements for creditors. [6] They suggest revisiting policies that have encouraged home ownership, such as policies that make mortgages available with little or no down payment. [6] The authors heavily criticize Senator Joe Biden for promoting legislation friendly to the banking industry. [4] Biden and Warren would then later compete for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, which Biden would win before going on to win the 2020 United States presidential election. [4]
In his review for The New York Times , economic policy consultant Jeff Madrick wrote that Warren and Tyagi "draw too fine a point here and there", but that ultimately "their main thesis is undeniable". [8]
In her review for the journal Educational Horizons, educator Audrey Ricker commented that the book "does a wonderful job of explaining why the American middle class is built on shifting sand", but criticized Warren and Tyagi for failing to explore opportunities afforded by a lower-income lifestyle, and for not including any interviews with families living in reduced economic circumstances. [2]
Journalist Matthew Yglesias revisited the book in early 2019, in light of Warren's candidacy for president in 2020. He praised The Two-Income Trap as "much realer and more interesting than any campaign book". Yglesias found the book to be an important source of insights to the evolution of Warren's policy positions, noting that the policy proposals in the fifteen-year-old book were of a smaller scale than Warren's current platform. In the context of the US in 2019, Yglesias found that the book presented "a striking mismatch between the scale of the problem it identifies and the relatively modest solutions it proposes". At the same time, however, Yglesias calls Warren "way ahead of the political curve" in her criticisms of banking industry practices. [4] Yglesias also noted Warren's emphasis on "normative" two-parent households and the societal value of raising children, which make The Two-Income Trap, in Yglesias' view, "a book social conservatives can love", but one with the potential to hurt Warren's appeal with some feminists. [4]
Matt Bruenig of the People's Policy Project, however, was much more critical. While he concedes that the book contains "valuable nuggets", he believes that its central premise is "based on what can only be described as a completely bogus and misleading analysis of income and consumption trends over time." Bruenig chalks up the apparent discrepancy behind the "two-income trap" to methodological mistakes on Warren's part, such as her making use of the wrong inflation index in her calculations. He argues Warren failed to account for category-specific inflation, with her instead applying overall inflation to each expenditure. He criticizes other oversights on her part, such as citing increased housing costs without considering the trend towards purchasing larger homes in recent decades. He also questions Warren's claim about homemakers acting as a secondary labor source, arguing it is insufficiently supported by evidence. Building on this, he argues that the concerns raised in the book can easily be solved by an expansion of the welfare state, and that conservative interest in the book is "constructing errors on top of errors". [9]
Elizabeth Ann Warren is an American politician and former law professor who is the senior United States senator from Massachusetts, serving since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party and regarded as a progressive, Warren has focused on consumer protection, equitable economic opportunity, and the social safety net while in the Senate. Warren was a candidate in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, ultimately finishing third.
A student loan is a type of loan designed to help students pay for post-secondary education and the associated fees, such as tuition, books and supplies, and living expenses. It may differ from other types of loans in the fact that the interest rate may be substantially lower and the repayment schedule may be deferred while the student is still in school. It also differs in many countries in the strict laws regulating renegotiating and bankruptcy. This article highlights the differences of the student loan system in several major countries.
Household debt is the combined debt of all people in a household, including consumer debt and mortgage loans. A significant rise in the level of this debt coincides historically with many severe economic crises and was a cause of the U.S. and subsequent European economic crises of 2007–2012. Several economists have argued that lowering this debt is essential to economic recovery in the U.S. and selected Eurozone countries.
A real-estate bubble or property bubble is a type of economic bubble that occurs periodically in local or global real estate markets, and it typically follows a land boom. A land boom is a rapid increase in the market price of real property such as housing until they reach unsustainable levels and then declines. This period, during the run-up to the crash, is also known as froth. The questions of whether real estate bubbles can be identified and prevented, and whether they have broader macroeconomic significance, are answered differently by schools of economic thought, as detailed below.
College tuition in the United States is the cost of higher education collected by educational institutions in the United States, and paid by individuals. It does not include the tuition covered through general taxes or from other government funds, or that which is paid from university endowment funds or gifts. Tuition for college has increased as the value, quality, and quantity of education have increased. Many feel that increases in cost have not been accompanied by increases in quality, and that administrative costs are excessive. The value of a college education has become a topic of national debate in the U.S.
Affluence refers to an individual's or household's economical and financial advantage in comparison to others. It may be assessed through either income or wealth.
In the United States, student loans are a form of financial aid intended to help students access higher education. In 2018, 70 percent of higher education graduates had used loans to cover some or all of their expenses. With notable exceptions, student loans must be repaid, in contrast to other forms of financial aid such as scholarships, which are not repaid, and grants, which rarely have to be repaid. Student loans may be discharged through bankruptcy, but this is difficult. Research shows that access to student loans increases credit-constrained students' degree completion, later-life earnings, and student loan repayment while having no impact on overall debt.
Income inequality has fluctuated considerably in the United States since measurements began around 1915, moving in an arc between peaks in the 1920s and 2000s, with a 30-year period of relatively lower inequality between 1950 and 1980.
The inequality of wealth has substantially increased in the United States in recent decades. Wealth commonly includes the values of any homes, automobiles, personal valuables, businesses, savings, and investments, as well as any associated debts.
The middle-class squeeze refers to negative trends in the standard of living and other conditions of the middle class of the population. Increases in wages fail to keep up with inflation for middle-income earners, leading to a relative decline in real wages, while at the same time, the phenomenon fails to have a similar effect on the top wage earners. People belonging to the middle class find that inflation in consumer goods and the housing market prevent them from maintaining a middle-class lifestyle, undermining aspirations of upward mobility.
Tax policy and economic inequality in the United States discusses how tax policy affects the distribution of income and wealth in the United States. Income inequality can be measured before- and after-tax; this article focuses on the after-tax aspects. Income tax rates applied to various income levels and tax expenditures primarily drive how market results are redistributed to impact the after-tax inequality. After-tax inequality has risen in the United States markedly since 1980, following a more egalitarian period following World War II.
Matthew Bruenig is an American lawyer, blogger, policy analyst, commentator, and founder of the left-leaning think tank People's Policy Project. He was a blogger for the American think tank Demos covering politics and public policy and has written on issues including income distribution, taxation, welfare, elections, the Nordic model, and funds socialism.
The 2020 presidential campaign of Elizabeth Warren was a campaign from the senior United States senator from Massachusetts. It began with Warren's formal announcement on February 9, 2019, at a rally in Lawrence, Massachusetts, at the site of the 1912 Bread and Roses Strike. The announcement followed widespread speculation that she would run after supporters urged her to run in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. In 2018, Warren had been considered a top contender for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
Amelia Louise Warren Tyagi is an American businesswoman, management consultant, and author. She co-founded and is president of the placement firm Business Talent Group, is a trustee emeritus of progressive think tank Demos, and co-founded HealthAllies. She co-authored two books, The Two-Income Trap and All Your Worth, with her mother Elizabeth Warren. She is a board member for the non-profit organization Fuse Corps and a former commentator for the radio show Marketplace.
Financial issues facing students in the United States include the rising cost of tuition, as well as ancillaries, such as room and board, textbook and coursework costs, personal expenses, and transportation.
People's Policy Project is an American think tank focused on social, economic, and political equity issues. It has been described as "left-leaning", "left-wing", "democratic socialist–leaning", and "socialist". The organization has been noted for its unique funding structure: Unlike conventional think tanks, 3P relies on crowdfunding small donations, as opposed to financial support from corporations.
Ganesh Sitaraman is an American legal scholar. He is a professor of law at Vanderbilt University, where he has also been a Chancellor Faculty Fellow and the director of the Program in Law and Government. He studies constitutional and foreign relations law.
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, also called the COVID-19 Stimulus Package or American Rescue Plan, is a US$1.9 trillion economic stimulus bill passed by the 117th United States Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden on March 11, 2021, to speed up the country's recovery from the economic and health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and recession. First proposed on January 14, 2021, the package builds upon many of the measures in the CARES Act from March 2020 and in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, from December.
The economic policy of the Joe Biden administration, colloquially known as Bidenomics, is characterized by relief measures and vaccination efforts to address the COVID-19 pandemic, investments in infrastructure, and strengthening the social safety net, funded by tax increases on higher-income individuals and corporations. Other goals include increasing the national minimum wage and expanding worker training, narrowing income inequality, expanding access to affordable healthcare, and forgiveness of student loan debt. The March 2021 enactment of the American Rescue Plan to provide relief from the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was the first major element of the policy. Biden's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was signed into law in November 2021 and contains about $550 billion in additional investment. Biden also signed three major pieces of longer-term economic legislation to repair infrastructure like roads, bridges and water pipes, boost semiconductor investment, and expand green energy.
Groundwork Collaborative (GWC) is an American 501(c)(3) non-profit think tank and progressive advocacy group based in Washington, D.C., that, according to its website, works to "change economic policy and narratives to build public power, curb private power, and create an economy that works for all of us." The organization is best known for research, analysis, and media commentary on economic issues, such as inflation, student debt, housing, and the U.S. labor market.