This Film Is Not Yet Rated

Last updated

This Film Is Not Yet Rated
TFINYR poster.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed by Kirby Dick
Written by
Produced byEddie Schmidt
Starring
  • Kirby Dick
  • Becky Altringer
Cinematography
Edited byMatthew Clarke
Music byMichael S. Patterson
Production
companies
  • Chain Camera
  • BBC
Distributed by IFC
Release dates
  • January 25, 2006 (2006-01-25)(Sundance)
  • September 1, 2006 (2006-09-01)(United States)
Running time
98 minutes
CountryUnited States [1] [2]
LanguageEnglish
Box office$339,609 [3]

This Film Is Not Yet Rated is a 2006 American documentary film about the Motion Picture Association of America's rating system and its effect on American culture, directed by Kirby Dick and produced by Eddie Schmidt. It premiered at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival and received a limited theatrical release on September 1, 2006. IFC, the film's distributor, aired the film later that year.

Contents

The film discusses a number of alleged disparities in the ratings the MPAA gives films and the feedback it gives filmmakers based on whether the project is a studio or independent film, whether the questionable content is violent or sexual in nature, and whether sexual content is heterosexual or homosexual and it centers on male or female pleasure.

The film includes numerous clips from films rated NC-17 to illustrate content that had garnered the rating. Therefore, the MPAA rated an early version of the film NC-17 due to "some graphic sexual content". Dick appealed this rating so he could chronicle both the rating and appeals process of the early version of the film in the final version, which, true to the title, is not rated.

Themes and discussion

Much of the film's press coverage was devoted to Dick and his crew's use of private investigator Becky Altringer to unmask the identities of the ratings and appeals board members.

Other revelations in the film include:

The film sparked some interest in the press when the MPAA rated it NC-17 for "some graphic sexual content". Then, when it premiered at Sundance, it was discovered that the rating process for an early version of the film and Dick’s appeal of that rating were depicted in the finished film. As the additional footage changed the film significantly, the NC-17 could no longer be used for the finished film, which would need to be resubmitted to the MPAA to receive a rating of its own. It never was, however, so the film was released without a rating.

After Sundance, the film went on to draw crowds at many other festivals, including South by Southwest and the Seattle International Film Festival, and received a theatrical release in fall 2006.

Interviews

Those interviewed in the film include:

MPAA rating board

According to the investigation depicted in the film, the following people were, as of 2006, members of the MPAA rating board, also known as CARA (Classification and Rating Administration). (Included is the personal information the film revealed about them, such as their age, the age of their children, and how long they had been on the board. These details were significant in the context of the film's critique of the MPAA ratings process, as the MPAA had said (according to the film) that the review board was composed of average American parents, with children and teenagers between the ages of 5 and 17, who serve on the board for fewer than seven years.):

MPAA appeals board

According to the investigation depicted in the film, the following people were, as of 2006, members of the MPAA appeals board:

Fair use

This Film Is Not Yet Rated incorporates clips from a number of films to illustrate its criticisms of the MPAA rating board. Dick had originally planned to license the clips from their owners, but discovered that studio licensing agreements would have prohibited him from using this material to criticize the entertainment industry. This prompted him, alongside prominent copyright attorney Michael C. Donaldson, to invoke the fair use doctrine, which permits limited use of copyrighted material to provide analysis and criticism of published works. [5] [6] The film's success using this tactic spurred interest in fair use, especially among documentary filmmakers. [7]

MPAA infringements

Before Dick sent the film to the MPAA to receive a rating, he was assured that the tape he submitted would not be viewed for any purpose other than rating and that no copies would be made or distributed, but, on January 24, 2006, the MPAA admitted to making duplicates of the film contrary to Dick's wishes. [8] However, they contended that doing so did not constitute copyright infringement or a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and said the privacy of the raters themselves might have been violated by Dick in the course of making the film, but no complaint had been filed against him. [8] Dick's lawyer, Michael Donaldson, requested that the MPAA destroy all copies of the film in their possession and notify him of who had seen the film and received copies. [9]

The DVD release of the film contains deleted scenes that show phone calls where Dick was assured by representatives of the MPAA that no copy would be made, as well as the one during which he found out that a copy had indeed been created.

Reception

On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 85% based on 117 reviews, and an average rating of 7.20; the critics consensus calls it: "A fascinating and entertaining film that will open many eyes to the often-questioned tactics of the MPAA and their ratings system." [10] On Metacritic the film has a score of 75 based on reviews from 33 critics. [11]

The film received a wave of favorable coverage by major publications. The magazines Rolling Stone ("terrific...indispensable"), [12] Entertainment Weekly ("irresistible"), [13] and USA Today ("rated R for raves"), [14] as well as critics such as Roger Ebert ("devastating") [15] and Slate 's Dana Stevens ("matter-of-factly presented, and thoroughly entertaining") [16] praised the film for its novel techniques and unprecedented revelations that dispute longstanding MPAA statements about the ratings system. [17]

Some critics disliked the film. David Poland of Movie City News wrote: "Even though it speaks to a subject I think is very important—the failures of the rating system and, specifically the NC-17—the tough, smart research just isn't in the film." [18]

Accolades

Award nominations for This Film Is Not Yet Rated
YearAwardOrganizationCategoryResult
2006 Austin Film Critics Award Austin Film Critics Association Best DocumentaryWon [19] [20] [21]
Critics Choice Award Broadcast Film Critics Association Best Documentary Feature Nominated [20] [21] [22]
2007 Golden Trailer Award Golden Trailer Awards Best DocumentaryWon [23] [24] [25]
GLAAD Media Award Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation Outstanding Documentary Nominated [26] [27] [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

An X rating is a film rating that indicates that the film contains content that is considered to be suitable only for adults. Films with an X rating may have scenes of graphic violence or explicit sexual acts that may be disturbing or offensive to some viewers. The X rating is used in different ways by different countries, and it may have legal or commercial implications for the distribution and exhibition of such films. For example, some countries may ban or restrict the sale or rental of X-rated films, while others may allow them only in specific theaters or with special taxes. Some countries may also have different criteria or definitions for what constitutes an X-rated film, and some may consider the artistic merit of the film as a factor in classification. The X rating has been replaced or renamed by other ratings in some countries over time.

The Motion Picture Associationfilm rating system is used in the United States and its territories to rate a motion picture's suitability for certain audiences based on its content. The system and the ratings applied to individual motion pictures are the responsibility of the Motion Picture Association (MPA), previously known as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) from 1945 to 2019. The MPA rating system is a voluntary scheme that is not enforced by law; films can be exhibited without a rating, although most theaters refuse to exhibit non-rated or NC-17 rated films. Non-members of the MPA may also submit films for rating. Other media, such as television programs, music and video games, are rated by other entities such as the TV Parental Guidelines, the RIAA and the ESRB, respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jack Valenti</span> American political advisor and lobbyist (1921–2007)

Jack Joseph Valenti was an American political advisor and lobbyist who served as a Special Assistant to U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson. He was also the longtime president of the Motion Picture Association of America. During his 38-year tenure in the MPAA, he created the MPAA film rating system, and was generally regarded as one of the most influential pro-copyright lobbyists in the world.

<i>South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut</i> 1999 adult animated film directed by Trey Parker

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut is a 1999 American adult animated musical comedy film based on the animated sitcom South Park. The film was directed by series creator Trey Parker from a screenplay co-written with series co-creator Matt Stone and Pam Brady; and stars Parker, Stone, Mary Kay Bergman, and Isaac Hayes, all of whom reprise their roles from the series, with George Clooney, Eric Idle, and Mike Judge in supporting roles. The plot follows Stan Marsh, Kyle Broflovski, Eric Cartman, and Kenny McCormick as they sneak into an R-rated film starring the Canadian comedy duo Terrance and Phillip, after which they begin swearing. When the consequent moral panic culminates in the United States declaring war on Canada, Stan, Kyle and Cartman take it upon themselves to save Terrance and Phillip from execution, while Kenny tries to prevent a prophecy involving Satan and Saddam Hussein's intent to conquer the world.

<i>But Im a Cheerleader</i> 1999 film by Jamie Babbit

But I'm a Cheerleader is a 1999 American satirical teen romantic comedy film directed by Jamie Babbit in her feature directorial debut and written by Brian Wayne Peterson. Natasha Lyonne stars as Megan Bloomfield, a high school cheerleader whose parents send her to a residential in-patient conversion therapy camp to "cure" her lesbianism. At camp, Megan realizes that she is indeed a lesbian and, despite the "therapy", comes to embrace her sexuality. The supporting cast includes Clea DuVall, RuPaul, and Cathy Moriarty.

<i>A Dirty Shame</i> 2004 film by John Waters

A Dirty Shame is a 2004 American satirical sex comedy film written and directed by John Waters and starring Tracey Ullman, Johnny Knoxville, Selma Blair, and Chris Isaak. It follows a community in suburban Baltimore divided between people with highly conservative attitudes towards sexuality, and those who have been turned into sex addicts after experiencing concussions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kimberly Peirce</span> American film director

Kimberly Ane Peirce is an American filmmaker, best known for her debut feature film, Boys Don't Cry (1999), which won Hilary Swank her first Academy Award for Best Actress. Peirce's second feature, Stop-Loss, was released by Paramount Pictures in 2008. Her third film Carrie was released on October 18, 2013. In addition to directing and writing, she is a governor of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences and a National Board member of the Directors Guild of America.

<i>Mysterious Skin</i> 2004 film by Gregg Araki

Mysterious Skin is a 2004 coming-of-age drama film written, produced, and directed by Gregg Araki, adapted from Scott Heim's 1995 novel of the same name. The film tells the story of two pre-adolescent boys who both experienced sexual abuse as children, and how it affects their lives in different ways into their young adulthood. One boy becomes a reckless, sexually adventurous sex worker, while the other retreats into a reclusive fantasy of alien abduction.

The British Columbia Film Classification Office, part of Consumer Protection BC in the Canadian province of British Columbia, is responsible for rating and censoring films under the province's Motion Picture Act. The BCFCO film ratings are also used by Manitoba and Saskatchewan by bilateral agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kirby Dick</span> American film director, producer, and screenwriter

Kirby Bryan Dick is an American film director, producer, screenwriter, and editor best known for directing documentary films. He received Academy Award nominations for Best Documentary Feature for directing Twist of Faith (2005) and The Invisible War (2012). He has also received numerous awards from film festivals, including the Sundance Film Festival and Los Angeles Film Festival.

<i>Whore</i> (1991 film) 1991 film by Ken Russell

Whore is a 1991 American satirical drama film directed by Ken Russell and starring Theresa Russell. It follows the life of a jaded street prostitute in Los Angeles. Benjamin Mouton, Antonio Fargas, Jack Nance, Danny Trejo, and Ginger Lynn Allen appear in supporting roles. The screenplay by Russell and Deborah Dalton is based on David Hines' monologue play, Bondage. The film is partly presented in a pseudo-documentary format, with the lead character often breaking the fourth wall and addressing the audience with monologues consisting of her observations and reflections on her career as a prostitute.

A re-edited film is a motion picture that has been modified from the manner in which it was showcased in its original theatrical release. Reasons for this type of editing may range from the distributor's demands to accommodating different audience groups. Fan-made movie edits are often met with controversy, as they bring up issues of copyright law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Film censorship</span> Films that are banned in a particular country

Film censorship is the censorship of motion pictures, either through the excising of certain frames or scenes, or outright banning of films in their entirety. Film censorship typically occurs as a result of political or moral objections to a film's content; controversial content subject to censorship include the depiction of graphic violence, sexual situations, or racial themes. Censorship standards vary widely by country, and can vary within an individual country over time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Movie and Television Review and Classification Board</span> Philippine government agency for classification of programs and movies

The Movie and Television Review and Classification Board is a Philippine government agency under the Office of the President of the Philippines that is responsible for the classification and review of television programs, motion pictures and home videos.

Motion picture ratings in Canada are mostly a provincial responsibility, and each province has its own legislation regarding exhibition and admission. For home video purposes, a single Canadian Home Video Rating System rating consisting of an average of the participating provincial ratings is displayed on retail packages, although various provinces may have rules on display and sale, especially for the R and A categories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motion Picture Association</span> Trade organization representing major American film studios

The Motion Picture Association (MPA) is an American trade association representing the five major film studios of the United States, as well as the video streaming service Netflix. Founded in 1922 as the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA) and known as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) from 1945 until September 2019, its original goal was to ensure the viability of the American film industry. In addition, the MPA established guidelines for film content which resulted in the creation of the Motion Picture Production Code in 1930. This code, also known as the Hays Code, was replaced by a voluntary film rating system in 1968, which is managed by the Classification and Rating Administration (CARA).

Intent to Kill is a 1992 action, independent and thriller film directed by Charles T. Kanganis. The film is about drug trafficking, prostitution and police activity. Intent to Kill is rated NC-17 by the United States' Motion Picture Association of America, the reason being extreme violence. This was the first motion picture that received the MPAA NC-17 rating because of violence rather than sexual content.

<i>Killer Joe</i> (film) 2011 film by William Friedkin

Killer Joe is a 2011 American Southern Gothic crime film directed by William Friedkin. The screenplay by Tracy Letts is based on his 1993 play of the same name. The film stars Matthew McConaughey in the title role, Emile Hirsch, Juno Temple, Gina Gershon, and Thomas Haden Church.

<i>Swearnet: The Movie</i> 2014 Canadian comedy film

Swearnet: The Movie is a 2014 Canadian dark comedy film directed by Warren P. Sonoda, written, produced by and starring Mike Smith, John Paul Tremblay, and Robb Wells, stars of the Canadian television series Trailer Park Boys. In the film, Smith, Tremblay and Wells play themselves, as they embark on creating a fully uncensored Internet network.

References

  1. ↑ "This Film is Not Yet Rated (2006)". AFI Catalog of Feature Films . Retrieved December 10, 2023.
  2. ↑ "This Film is Not Yet Rated (2006)". British Film Institute . Retrieved December 10, 2023.
  3. ↑ "This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2006)". Box Office Mojo . Internet Movie Database. December 21, 2006. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  4. ↑ James Wall's blog
  5. ↑ Schager, Nick (August 21, 2006). "Interview: Kirby Dick Talks This Film Is Not Yet Rated". Slant Magazine. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  6. ↑ Cullum, Paul (August 17, 2006). "Freedom of Information". LA Weekly. Archived from the original on September 8, 2009. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  7. ↑ McNary, Dave (February 22, 2007). "Insurance for documentary 'fair use'". Variety. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  8. 1 2 Bangeman, Eric (January 24, 2006). "MPAA admits to unauthorized movie copying". Ars Technica.
  9. ↑ Emerson, Jim (January 26, 2006). "MPAA accused of DVD piracy". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on April 29, 2007.
  10. ↑ "This Film is Not Yet Rated". Rotten Tomatoes . Fandango Media . Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  11. ↑ "This Film Is Not Yet Rated". Metacritic . CBS Interactive . Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  12. ↑ Travers, Peter (August 3, 2006). "This Film Is Not Yet Rated". Rolling Stone . Archived from the original on August 22, 2023. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  13. ↑ Gleiberman, Owen (August 30, 2006). "This Film Is Not Yet Rated". EW.com. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  14. ↑ Puig, Claudia (September 1, 2006). "'This Film' rates a 'PG' for pretty (darn) gutsy". USA Today . Archived from the original on December 9, 2006. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  15. ↑ Ebert, Roger (September 14, 2006). "How do the ratings rate?". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  16. ↑ Stevens, Dana (August 31, 2006). "Thrust in Us". Slate . ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  17. ↑ Chocano, Carina (September 1, 2006). "'This Film Is Not Yet Rated'". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on November 25, 2007. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
  18. ↑ Poland, David (January 25, 2006). "For Movie Folks Who Considered Burning Down The Ratings Board When The Adjustment Was Enuf". Movie City News. Archived from the original on November 8, 2011. Retrieved August 19, 2009.
  19. ↑ Austin Film Critics Association (January 2, 2007). "2006 Awards". Austin Film Critics Awards . Austin, Texas. Archived from the original on February 22, 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  20. 1 2 "This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2005) – Awards". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times . 2013. Archived from the original on May 18, 2013. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  21. 1 2 "This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2005) – Awards". Allmovie . 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  22. ↑ Moore, Roger (December 13, 2006). "Friday, This Film is Not Yet Rated". Orlando Sentinel . Archived from the original on July 7, 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  23. ↑ "GTA 8 WINNER – Best Documentary Trailer". Golden Trailer Awards . www.goldentrailer.com. 2009. Archived from the original on May 7, 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  24. ↑ "8th Annual Golden Trailer Award Winner and Nominees". Golden Trailer Awards . www.goldentrailer.com. May 31, 2007. Archived from the original on March 3, 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  25. ↑ Douglas, Edward (May 31, 2007). "The 8th Annual Golden Trailer Awards Winners!". ComingSoon.net . Crave Online Media, LLC. Archived from the original on June 3, 2007. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  26. ↑ Wicks, Kevin (January 22, 2007). "BBC America scores two GLAAD Media Award nominations". BBC America . BBC Worldwide Americas, Inc. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  27. ↑ "Controversial Documentary Outs Closeted Anti-gay Politicians". GO Magazine . GO NYC Media, LLC. June 10, 2009. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
  28. ↑ Ferraro, Richard (January 21, 2007). "GLAAD anuncia los nominados y galardonados especiales de la decimo octava ceremonia anual de los premios GLAAD". Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (in Spanish). www.glaad.org. Archived from the original on December 2, 2022. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.