Metacritic

Last updated

Metacritic
Metacritic logo.svg
Type of site
Review aggregator
Owner CBS Interactive
URL www.metacritic.com
Alexa rankDecrease2.svg 2,392 (May 2020) [1]
CommercialYes
RegistrationFree/subscription
LaunchedJanuary 2001;19 years ago (2001-01)
Current statusActive
OCLC  number 911795326

Metacritic is a website that aggregates reviews of films, TV shows, music albums, video games and formerly, books. For each product, the scores from each review are averaged (a weighted average). Metacritic was created by Jason Dietz, Marc Doyle, and Julie Doyle Roberts in 1999. The site provides an excerpt from each review and hyperlinks to its source. A color of green, yellow or red summarizes the critics' recommendations. It is regarded as the foremost online review aggregation site for the video game industry. [2] [3]

Contents

Metacritic's scoring converts each review into a percentage, either mathematically from the mark given, or what the site decides subjectively from a qualitative review. Before being averaged, the scores are weighted according to the critic's fame, stature, and volume of reviews. The website won two Webby Awards for excellence as an aggregation website. Criticism has focused on the assessment system, alleged third-party attempts to influence the scores, and the lack of staff oversight of user reviews.

History

The original logo for Metacritic Metacritic logo original.svg
The original logo for Metacritic

Metacritic was launched in January 2001 [4] by Marc Doyle, his sister Julie Doyle Roberts, and a classmate from the University of Southern California law school, Jason Dietz, after two years of developing the site. Rotten Tomatoes was already compiling movie reviews, but Doyle, Roberts and Dietz saw an opportunity to cover a broader range of media. They sold Metacritic to CNET in 2005. [5] CNET and Metacritic were later acquired by the CBS Corporation. [6]

Influence

Metacritic has been used by businesses to predict future sales. Nick Wingfield of The Wall Street Journal wrote that Metacritic "influence[s] the sales of games and the stocks of video game publishers". He explains its influence as coming from the higher cost of buying video games than music or movie tickets. [5] Many executives say that low scores "can hurt the long-term sales potential". [5] Wingfield wrote that Wall Street pays attention to Metacritic and GameRankings because the sites typically post scores before sales data are publicly available, citing the respective rapid rise and fall in company values after BioShock and Spider-Man 3 were released. [5] In an interview with The Guardian , Marc Doyle cited two major publishers that "conducted comprehensive statistical surveys through which they've been able to draw a correlation between high metascores and stronger sales" in certain genres. [7] He claimed that an increasing number of businesses and financial analysts use Metacritic as "an early indicator of a game's potential sales and, by extension, the publisher's stock price". [7] However, a 2015 study analyzing over 88 Xbox 360 and 80 PS3 games from 2012 found that Metacritic scores did not impact actual sales. [8]

Controversially, the website has been used by game publishers as a means of determining whether a game's developer receives additional royalties. One notable example is the 2010 game Fallout: New Vegas , which received an average Metascore of 84—one point too short of Bethesda's, the game's publisher, 85-point requirement. As a result, its developer, Obsidian Entertainment, received no additional bonus. Columnists took issue with the company's use of Metacritic, with one suggesting that that makes game critics ultimately accountable for deciding the developer's profits and another pointing out that a Metascore of 84 is not significantly lower than 85. The latter also pointed out the impressive sales of five million sold units and US$300 million in revenue, and also noted a series of Obsidian's layoffs in 2011 and 2012. [9] [10]

On the other hand, the website has been used by columnists and commentators as a general reference for critical reception, [11] and by publishers as a tool of improving their products. Along with other executives, in 2008, John Riccitiello, then CEO of Electronic Arts, showed Wall Street analysts a chart illustrating a downward trend in the average critical ratings of the company's games. He took the ratings seriously and stressed the need for the company to bounce back. [12] Also in 2008, Microsoft used Metacritic averages to delist underperforming Xbox Live Arcade games. [13] [14]

Metascores

Scores are weighted averages. Certain publications are given more significance "because of their stature". [5] Metacritic has said that it will not reveal the relative weight assigned to each reviewer. [15]

Games Editor Marc Doyle was interviewed by Keith Stuart of The Guardian to "get a look behind the metascoring process". Stuart wrote: "The metascore phenomenon, namely Metacritic and GameRankings, have become an enormously important element of online games journalism over the past few years". [7] Doyle said that because video games lead to a greater investment of time and money, gamers are more informed about reviews than are fans of film or music; they want to know "whether that hotly anticipated title is going to deliver". [7]

Score index [16]
IndicationVideo gamesFilms/television/music
Universal acclaim90–10081–100
Generally favorable reviews75–8961–80
Mixed or average reviews50–7440–60
Generally unfavorable reviews20–4920–39
Overwhelming dislike0–19

In June 2018, Metacritic established the "Must-See" label for a movie that "achieves a Metascore of 81 or higher and has been reviewed by a minimum of 15 professional critics". [17] In September 2018, it added the "Must-Play" certification for video games attaining a score of 90% or more, and a minimum number of 15 reviews from industry professionals. [18] [19]

Reception

Metacritic received mixed reviews from website critics, commentators, and columnists alike. Its efficacy has been analyzed, with conclusions finding it to be generally useful [20] or unreliable and biased. [21] The website won two annual Webby Awards for excellence in the "Guides/Ratings/Reviews" category, in 2010 and 2015. [22] [23]

Criticism

Metacritic has been criticized for converting all scoring systems into a single quantitative percentage-based scale. For example, an "A" score equates to the value of 100, an "F" the value of zero, and a "B–" the value of 67. [7] Joe Dodson, former editor at Game Revolution, criticized Metacritic and similar sites for turning reviews into scores that he found to be too low. [5] Doyle defended the grading system, believing that every scale should be converted directly to that of the website, with its lowest possible score being 0 and the highest 100. [7] Further criticism was directed to the website's refusal to publicize how it aggregates scores. [8]

According to Doyle, publishers often try to persuade him to exclude reviews they feel are unfair. [5] A Washington Post review of Uncharted 4 was assigned with a rating of 40/100 by Metacritic; this was the only negative review of the game. [24] Readers who disapproved of the review petitioned Metacritic to remove the Post as a trusted source. [25] As a result of its perceived negative influence on the industry, several reviewing sites, including Kotaku and Eurogamer , have dropped numerical reviews that would appear in Metacritic, instead favoring a qualitative assessment of a game. [26] [27] Kotaku also highlighted a practice alleged to be used by some publishers who use Metacritic scores as a way to leverage more favorable terms for the publisher or deny developers bonuses should they not reach a certain score. Doyle countered this by saying "Metacritic has absolutely nothing to do with how the industry uses our numbers... Metacritic has always been about educating the gamer. We're using product reviews as a tool to help them make the most of their time and money." [28]

Metacritic has also been criticized for how it handles banning users and their reviews, with no notice or formal process for appeal. [29] Critics and developers have pointed out that a product can suffer from rating manipulation by users, as by garnering low ratings that purposely damage its reputation or by receiving high ratings from throwaway accounts to make it appear more popular than it actually is. Signal Studios president and creative director Douglas Albright described the website as having no standards. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

A video game developer is a software developer that specializes in video game development – the process and related disciplines of creating video games. A game developer can range from one person who undertakes all tasks to a large business with employee responsibilities split between individual disciplines, such as programming, design, art, testing, etc. Most game development companies have video game publisher financial and usually marketing support. Self-funded developers are known as independent or indie developers and usually make indie games.

Entertainment Software Rating Board North American self-regulatory organization that assigns age and content ratings for video games

The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) is an American self-regulatory organization that assigns age and content ratings to consumer video games. The ESRB was established in 1994 by the Entertainment Software Association, in response to criticism of controversial video games with excessively violent or sexual content, particularly after the 1993 congressional hearings following the releases of Mortal Kombat and Night Trap for home consoles. The industry, pressured with potential government oversight of video game ratings from these hearings, established both the IDSA and the ESRB within it to create a voluntary ratings system based on the Motion Picture Association of America film rating system with additional considerations for video game interactivity.

2003 has seen many sequels and prequels in video games and several new titles such as Beyond Good & Evil, Manhunt, Call of Duty, Mario & Luigi Superstar Saga, PlanetSide, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, True Crime: Streets of LA, and WWE SmackDown! Here Comes the Pain.

<i>Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing</i> 2003 racing video game

Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing is a racing video game developed by Stellar Stone and published by GameMill Publishing, released for Microsoft Windows on November 20, 2003, in North America.

GameRankings American website that collects review scores from both offline and online sources to give an average rating

GameRankings was a video gaming review aggregator that was founded in 1999 and owned by CBS Interactive. It indexed over 315,000 articles relating to more than 14,500 video games. GameRankings was discontinued in December 2019, with its staff and older reviews being merged with the similar aggregator Metacritic.

2007 has seen many sequels and prequels in video games. New intellectual properties include Halo 3, Assassin's Creed, BioShock, Crackdown, Crysis, Mass Effect, Portal, Rock Band, Skate, The Darkness, The Witcher, Uncharted, Super Paper Mario, Super Mario Galaxy, Mario Party 8, and Team Fortress 2.

<i>Pirates of the Caribbean Online</i> 2007 video game

Pirates of the Caribbean Online was a massively multiplayer online role-playing video game based on the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. It was developed and published by Disney Online, in conjunction with SilverTree Media, for Microsoft Windows and Mac OS X, with additional post-release content developed by Schell Games. The game was first announced by The Walt Disney Company in April 2005, and was originally meant to coincide with the release of Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest in 2006, but its release was pushed back multiple times. The game went through two beta testing phases during 2007, and was officially released in October of that year, utilizing the Panda3D game engine. Pirates of the Caribbean Online was shut down in September 2013.

<i>IGN</i> American entertainment website

IGN is an American video game and entertainment media website operated by IGN Entertainment Inc., a subsidiary of Ziff Davis, itself wholly owned by j2 Global. The company is located in San Francisco's SOMA district and is headed by its former editor-in-chief, Peer Schneider. The IGN website was the brainchild of media entrepreneur Chris Anderson and launched on September 29, 1996. It focuses on games, films, television, comics, technology, and other media. Originally a network of desktop websites, IGN is now also distributed on mobile platforms, console programs on the Xbox and PlayStation, FireTV, Roku, and via YouTube, Twitch, Hulu, and Snapchat.

Tony Hawk's is a skateboarding video game series published by Activision from 1999 to 2015, and endorsed by the eponymous American professional skateboarder. The series was primarily developed for home consoles by Neversoft from launch to 2007, until Activision transferred the franchise to Robomodo in 2008. The licensing deal between Activision and Hawk expired in 2015, leaving the future of the series uncertain. The series had spawned a total of 17 games.

The simExchange

The simExchange is a web-based prediction market in which players use virtual money to buy and sell stocks and futures contracts in upcoming video game properties. The main purpose of the web site is to predict trends in the video game industry, particularly how upcoming products will sell and how they will be received by the critics. For those who do not participate in the prediction market, the web site is a database of sales forecasts and game quality forecasts that are updated in real-time. The web site also features a number of "Wisdom of the crowd"-type content collaboration and aggregation tools, including means for sharing information, articles, images, and videos about the games.

The PAL Gaming Network (PALGN) was an Australian-based video game news and reviews website that focused on the videogame industry and culture in PAL territories, particularly Australia and the UK. It was launched in 2003 by a group of PAL forum members on the IGN message boards who were disenfranchised by the American site's move to subscription based boards. In August 2003, The Sydney Morning Herald said the upstart website's "dedication to console gaming in PAL markets is admirable."

A review aggregator is a system that collects reviews of products and services. This system stores the reviews and uses them for purposes such as supporting a website where users can view the reviews, selling information to third parties about consumer tendencies, and creating databases for companies to learn about their actual and potential customers. The system enables users to easily compare many different reviews of the same work. Many of these systems calculate an approximate average assessment, usually based on assigning a numeric value to each review related to its degree of positive rating of the work.

<i>McPixel</i> video game

McPixel is an independently produced puzzle video game by Polish developer Mikołaj Kamiński in 2012.

The Coalition (company) Xbox Game Studios developer, known for the Gears of War series

The Coalition is a Canadian video game developer and a studio of Xbox Game Studios based in Vancouver. The Coalition is best known for developing games in the Gears of War series after the franchise's acquisition by Xbox Game Studios from Epic Games.

<i>Day One: Garrys Incident</i> 2013 video game

Day One: Garry's Incident is a PC survival game developed and published by Wild Games Studio in Mascouche, Québec, Canada and released on 25 September 2013. The game received primarily negative reviews from critics. After a negative critique of the game was published on YouTube, Wild Games Studio had the video taken down using the site's automated copyright complaints system. A well known game critic TotalBiscuit claimed that the copyright complaint was part of a deliberate attempt to censor online criticisms. After receiving negative attention for their copyright complaint, the game's developers apologized and withdrew the complaint. The developers were also accused of astroturfing online reviews on Metacritic.

Video game journalism is a branch of journalism concerned with the reporting and discussion of video games, typically based on a core "reveal–preview–review" cycle. With the prevalence and rise of independent media online, online publications and blogs have grown.

Creative Mobile is an independent video game developer and publisher based in Tallinn, Estonia.

OpenCritic video game review aggregator

OpenCritic is a review aggregation website for video games. OpenCritic lists reviews from critics across multiple video game publications for the games listed on the site. The website then generates a numeric score by averaging all of the numeric reviews. Several other metrics are also available, such as the percentage of critics that recommend the game and its relative ranking across all games on OpenCritic.

A review bomb is an Internet phenomenon in which large groups of people leave negative user reviews online for a published work, most commonly a video game or a theatrical film, in an attempt to harm the sales or popularity of a product, particularly to draw attention to an issue with the product or its vendor. While a review bomb may be a result of consumers criticizing the poor quality of the product, it is more commonly associated with perceived political and cultural issues around the product, its vendor, or related works. This is often done to draw wider and mainstream attention to that issue, especially if the vendor does not have an open communications channel or seems unresponsive to direct feedback, but may also as a means of mass-driven coercion or simply a result of trolling. Review bombing is a similar practice to and shares characteristics of vote brigading.

References

  1. "metacritic.com Traffic Statistics". Alexa Internet . Retrieved May 3, 2020.
  2. Leack, Jonathan (September 25, 2015). "OpenCritic's Gamer-Centric Style Is Everything Metacritic Should Have Been". Game Revolution . Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  3. Rose, Mike (July 10, 2012). "Metacritic is here to stay, but can we fix it?". Gamasutra . Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  4. "Metacritic: The History", Metacritic.com
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Nick Wingfield (September 20, 2007). "High Scores Matter To Game Makers, Too". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved February 15, 2008.
  6. "Columbia Journalism Review - CJR's guide to what the major media companies own". Archived from the original on April 17, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stuart, Keith (January 17, 2008). "Interview: the science and art of Metacritic". The Guardian . Retrieved February 15, 2008.
  8. 1 2 Khan, Imad (December 11, 2015). "Do Metacritic scores affect game sales?". The Daily Dot . Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  9. MacDonald, Keza (July 16, 2012). "Is Metacritic Ruining The Games Industry?". IGN . Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  10. Orland, Kyle (March 15, 2012). "Why linking developer bonuses to Metacritic scores should come to an end". Ars Technica . Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  11. Gilbert, Ben (May 9, 2019). "The 10 best Pokémon games of all time, according to critics". Business Insider . Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  12. Hillis, Scott (February 21, 2008). "Game scoring site wields industry clout". Reuters . Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  13. Remo, Chris (May 22, 2008). "Microsoft To Delist Low-Ranking XBLA Titles, Raise Size Limit". Gamasutra . Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  14. Keiser, Joe (May 22, 2008). "EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: MS to Delist XBLA Titles". Next Generation. Archived from the original on January 24, 2012. Retrieved May 29, 2008.
  15. "Frequently Asked Questions". Metacritic. Retrieved July 29, 2015.
  16. "How We Create the Metascore Magic". Metacritic. Archived from the original on September 28, 2015. Retrieved May 13, 2012.
  17. "New on Metacritic: Must-See Movies". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. June 11, 2018. Archived from the original on October 18, 2018. Retrieved October 16, 2018.
  18. Leonard, Matt (September 12, 2018). "Metacritic Adds 'Must-Play' Label to Highly Reviewed Games". Game Revolution . Retrieved September 9, 2019.
  19. "New on Metacritic: Must-Play Games". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. September 12, 2018. Archived from the original on September 14, 2018. Retrieved April 24, 2020.
  20. Grubb, Jeff (August 7, 2013). "Metacritic works: Why the review-aggregation site is important for the average consumer". VentureBeat . Retrieved September 7, 2019.
  21. Spector, Warren (May 13, 2013). "Defining Success: Why Metacritic Should Be Irrelevant". GamesIndustry.biz . Retrieved September 7, 2019.
  22. "2010 Webby Award Winner". International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences. 2010. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
  23. "2015 Webby Award Winner". International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences. 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
  24. "Uncharted 4: A Thief's End for Playstation 4 Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved August 6, 2018.
  25. Schreier, Jason (May 16, 2016). "Reviewer Targeted For Giving Uncharted 4 Negative Review". Kotaku . Retrieved May 16, 2016.
  26. Tolito, Stephan (January 30, 2012). "How We Will Review Games". Kotaku . Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  27. Welsh, Oli (February 10, 2015). "Eurogamer has dropped review scores". Eurogamer . Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  28. Schreier, Jason (August 8, 2015). "Metacritic Matters: How Review Scores Hurt Video Games". Kotaku . Retrieved November 27, 2019.
  29. "Metacritic Bans "Bombing" Users – Bans several users only after a request by developers" . Retrieved September 23, 2011.
  30. Klepek, Patrick (September 22, 2011). "Metacritic criticized by company president – Exclaims site without standards". Giant Bomb . Retrieved September 22, 2011.