VisualEditor

Last updated
VisualEditor
Developer(s) Wikimedia Foundation and Fandom, Inc.
Repository
Written in JavaScript, Node.js, PHP
Operating system Cross-platform
Platform MediaWiki extension
Type Wiki
License MIT [1]
Website www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor

VisualEditor (VE) is an online rich-text editor for MediaWiki-powered wikis that provides a way to edit pages based on the "what you see is what you get" principle. It was developed by the Wikimedia Foundation in partnership with Fandom. [2] In July 2013, it was enabled by default on several of the largest Wikipedia projects. [3] [4]

Contents

The Wikimedia Foundation considered it the most challenging feature to date, while The Economist has called it Wikipedia's "most significant feature". [5] According to The Daily Dot , the Wikimedia Foundation's pursuit of wider participation may regret alienating existing editors. [6] In September 2013, English Wikipedia's VisualEditor was changed from opt-out to opt-in, following user complaints, [7] [8] but it was returned to being available by default (for new registered users only) in October 2015 after more development. [9] A 2015 study by the Wikimedia Foundation found that VisualEditor failed to provide the anticipated benefits for new editors. [10]

VisualEditor is bundled with every MediaWiki releases since version 1.35, released in September 2020. [11]

Development

'Editing makes me feel stupid' - user tests commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation from 2009 which demonstrate the difficulty that ordinary users were having with editing MediaWiki code.
In a presentation from Wikimania 2013, the team developing the software presented it to attendees

The original web-based Wikipedia editor provided by MediaWiki is a plain browser-based text editor, also called 'Source editor', where authors have to learn the wiki markup language to edit. [12] A what you see is what you get (WYSIWYG) editor for Wikipedia had been planned for years in order to remove the need to learn the wiki markup language. It was hoped this would reduce the technical hurdle for would-be Wikipedians, enabling wider participation in editing, and was an attempt to reverse the decline in editor numbers of 50,000 in 2006 to 35,000 in 2011, having peaked in 2007. [5] [6] It was part of a $1m project aimed at developing new features and making improvements. [5] A goal of the project is to allow both the former wiki markup editing and editing with the WYSIWYG VisualEditor. [13] According to Wikimedia Foundation's Jay Walsh, the hope is to redress under-represented contributions from Arabic, Portuguese, and Indic-language versions of the site. [6] [note 1]

According to Wikimedia Foundation, "There are various reasons that lead existing and prospective contributors not to edit; among them, the complexity of wiki markup is a major issue. One of VisualEditor's goals is to empower knowledgeable and good-faith users to edit and become valuable members of the community, even if they're not wiki markup experts. We also hope that, with time, experienced editors will find VisualEditor useful for some of their editing tasks." [4] In 2012, Sue Gardner, the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, said "we don't think that the visual editor, in and of itself, is going to solve the challenge", [14] and Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales remarked "This is epically important". [15]

Rollout

MediaWiki is used by numerous wikis, with smaller sites originally conceived as being rolled out first. [16] VisualEditor was planned to be rolled out on the English-language Wikipedia for editors with registered accounts, and then for anonymous editors. [17] The alpha version was made available to select users in December 2012, widened to all registered users in April. [18] It was the default editor for users logged-into the English-language Wikipedia in July 2013. [4] [6] It was subsequently made opt-in on the English-language Wikipedia in September 2013 due to community complaints over its stability, and implementation was buggy and had limitations [7] [8] (though it remained active for most non-English Wikipedias). [19] In 2015, it completed its beta development phase and was again made available on English Wikipedia. [9] [20]

Technical

The Wikimedia Foundation joined forces with Wikia to work on the project. [21] The implementation encountered challenges with the wiki markup language (the basis for Wikipedia articles), due to it being continuously extended over 12 years to include seldom-used rich and complex features making reproduction of the final article appearance dependent on many factors that were not easy to reproduce. [22] The technical implementation required improvements to MediaWiki in parsing, wiki markup language, the DOM and final HTML conversion. [23] A necessary component is a parser server called Parsoid [note 2] which was created to convert in both directions between wikitext and a format suitable for VisualEditor. [22] The Wikimedia Foundation considered VisualEditor its most challenging technical project to date. [5]

Before 2024, supported web browsers included modern versions of Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. In 2024, the code to check for a supported browser was removed. [24]

The VisualEditor MediaWiki extension is available for download by server operators and typically requires the latest version of MediaWiki, it is bundled since MediaWiki 1.35. [11]

Online rich-text editor

According to the VisualEditor team, the aim is "to create a reliable rich-text editor for MediaWiki", [19] a "visual editor" which is "WYSIWYG-like". [25] The implementation is split into a "core" online rich-text editor which can run independently of MediaWiki, [26] and a MediaWiki extension. [27]

Response

Responses to the introduction of the VisualEditor have greatly varied, with The Economist 's L.M. calling it "the most significant change in Wikipedia's short history." [5]

Opposition

Some editors expressed concerns about the rollout and bugs, with the German Wikipedia community deciding to use an opt-in model instead of an opt-out one. [6] [28] Irish Wikipedia administrator Oliver Moran, echoing concerns of other editors, said that users may feel belittled by the implication that "certain people" are confused by wiki markup and therefore need the VisualEditor, comparing the learning of wikitext favorably to Twitter's hashtag and @ (at sign) mention syntax. [29]

Three months after the rollout of the VisualEditor to the English Wikipedia, The Daily Dot reported that the Wikimedia Foundation had experienced backlash from long-time editors who deemed the editor "buggy and untested". Following discourse between the community and the foundation, Wikipedia administrator Kww overrode the foundation's rollout, making it opt-in, instead of opt-out. The Foundation did not revert the change, instead committing to further improving VisualEditor. [7] [8]

Support

Softpedia ran an article titled "Wikipedia's New VisualEditor Is the Best Update in Years and You Can Make It Better". [30] The Register said that the update brings the foundation "a little closer to its goal of making it easier for anyone to create and edit Wikipedia articles." [18]

Research results

Aaron Halfaker, a research scientist at the Wikimedia Foundation, ran a controlled study on the effects of VisualEditor in May 2015. The study found that VisualEditor did not increase editor productivity, however reducing the burden upon existing editors. Editing took 18 seconds longer with VisualEditor before hitting save, and new editors were less likely to save their work. Halfaker however did ascribe these negative results as from editors testing the new system, not any real struggle. [10] A previous June 2013 controlled test — when VisualEditor was less mature — showed similar neutral and negative results. [31]

See also

Notes

  1. Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati
  2. "Parsoid". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2014-11-25.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Wikipedia</span>

Wikipedia, a free-content online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers known as Wikipedians, began with its first edit on 15 January 2001, two days after the domain was registered. It grew out of Nupedia, a more structured free encyclopedia, as a way to allow easier and faster drafting of articles and translations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LaTeX</span> Typesetting system

LaTeX is a software system for typesetting documents. LaTeX markup describes the content and layout of the document, as opposed to the formatted text found in WYSIWYG word processors like Google Docs, LibreOffice Writer, and Microsoft Word. The writer uses markup tagging conventions to define the general structure of a document, to stylize text throughout a document, and to add citations and cross-references. A TeX distribution such as TeX Live or MiKTeX is used to produce an output file suitable for printing or digital distribution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiki</span> Type of website that visitors can edit

A wiki is a form of hypertext publication on the internet which is collaboratively edited and managed by its audience directly through a web browser. A typical wiki contains multiple pages that can either be edited by the public or limited to use within an organization for maintaining its internal knowledge base.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiki software</span> Software to run a collaborative wiki (Including private wiki)

Wiki software is collaborative software that runs a wiki, which allows the users to create and collaboratively edit pages or entries via a web browser. A wiki system is usually a web application that runs on one or more web servers. The content, including previous revisions, is usually stored in either a file system or a database. Wikis are a type of web content management system, and the most commonly supported off-the-shelf software that web hosting facilities offer.

In computing, WYSIWYG, an acronym for what you see is what you get, refers to software that allows content to be edited in a form that resembles its appearance when printed or displayed as a finished product, such as a printed document, web page, or slide presentation. WYSIWYG implies a user interface that allows the user to view something very similar to the result while the document is being created. In general, WYSIWYG implies the ability to directly manipulate the layout of a document without having to type or remember names of layout commands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MediaWiki</span> Free and open-source wiki software

MediaWiki is free and open-source wiki software originally developed by Magnus Manske for use on Wikipedia on January 25, 2002, and further improved by Lee Daniel Crocker, after which development has been coordinated by the Wikimedia Foundation. It powers several wiki hosting websites across the Internet, as well as most websites hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation including Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikiquote, Meta-Wiki and Wikidata, which define a large part of the set requirements for the software. Besides its usage on Wikimedia sites, MediaWiki has been used as a knowledge management and content management system on websites such as Fandom, wikiHow and major internal installations like Intellipedia and Diplopedia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Wikipedia</span> English-language edition of Wikipedia

The English Wikipedia is the primary English-language edition of Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. It was created by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger on 15 January 2001, as Wikipedia's first edition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikibooks</span> Free resource library of books

Wikibooks is a wiki-based Wikimedia project hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation for the creation of free content digital textbooks and annotated texts that anyone can edit.

Wikisource is an online wiki-based digital library of free-content textual sources operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikisource is the name of the project as a whole; it is also the name for each instance of that project, one for each language. The project's aim is to host all forms of free text, in many languages, and translations. Originally conceived as an archive to store useful or important historical texts, it has expanded to become a general-content library. The project officially began on November 24, 2003, under the name Project Sourceberg, a play on Project Gutenberg. The name Wikisource was adopted later that year and it received its own domain name.

A visual editor is computer software for editing text files using a textual or graphical user interface that normally renders the content (text) in accordance with embedded markup code, e.g., HTML, Wikitext, rather than displaying the raw text. Edits made to the page appear in real time, correctly formatted, and are often referred to as WYSIWYG. It is common for the software to permit switching to source-code editor mode so that the original source code can be viewed or modified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">XWiki</span> Wiki engine

XWiki is a free and Open source wiki software platform written in Java with a design emphasis on extensibility. XWiki is an enterprise wiki. It includes WYSIWYG editing, OpenDocument-based document import/export, annotations and tagging, and advanced permissions management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Markdown</span> Plain text markup language

Markdown is a lightweight markup language for creating formatted text using a plain-text editor. John Gruber created Markdown in 2004 as an easy-to-read markup language. Markdown is widely used for blogging and instant messaging, and also used elsewhere in online forums, collaborative software, documentation pages, and readme files.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikimedia movement</span> Group of global contributors to Wikimedia projects

The Wikimedia movement is the global community of contributors to the Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia. This community directly builds and administers these projects with the commitment of achieving this using open standards and software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of wikis</span>

The history of wikis began in 1994, when Ward Cunningham gave the name "WikiWikiWeb" to the knowledge base, which ran on his company's website at c2.com, and the wiki software that powered it. The wiki went public in March 1995, the date used in anniversary celebrations of the wiki's origins. c2.com is thus the first true wiki, or a website with pages and links that can be easily edited via the browser, with a reliable version history for each page. He chose "WikiWikiWeb" as the name based on his memories of the "Wiki Wiki Shuttle" at Honolulu International Airport, and because "wiki" is the Hawaiian word for "quick".

Flagged Revisions, also known as FlaggedRevs, is a software extension to the MediaWiki software that allows moderation of edits to wiki pages. It was developed by the Wikimedia Foundation for use on Wikipedia and similar wikis hosted on its servers. The term is also sometimes used for the editorial policies related to operation of that extension when active.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MindTouch</span>

MindTouch was an American multinational technology company headquartered in San Diego, California that designed, developed, and sold SaaS computer software and online services. MindTouch was founded by Aaron Fulkerson and Steve Bjorg in 2005. In January 2016, MindTouch announced their Series A Venture Capital funding round, totaling US$12 million. PeakSpan Capital led the round with participation from SK Ventures and SAP SE. In April 2021, MindTouch was acquired by NICE CXone and rebranded NICE CXone Expert.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikiversity</span> Wikimedia wiki for learning materials

Wikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project that supports learning communities, their learning materials, and resulting activities. It differs from Wikipedia in that it offers tutorials and other materials for the fostering of learning, rather than an encyclopedia. It is available in many languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of Wikipedia</span> Overview and topical guide to the free online crowdsourced encyclopedia

The following outline is provided as an overview of and a topical guide to Wikipedia:

A user revolt is a social conflict in which users of a website collectively and openly protest a website host's or administrator's instructions for using the website. Sometimes it happens that the website hosts can control a website's use in certain ways, but the hosts also depend on the users to comply with voluntary social rules in order for the website to operate as the hosts would like. A user revolt occurs when the website users protest against the voluntary social rules of a website, and use the website in a way that is in conflict with the wishes of the website host or administrators.

References

  1. LICENSE.txt, VisualEditor source code repository
  2. Andrew Webster (2012-06-22). "Wikimedia releases updated prototype for simplified visual editor". The Verge . Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  3. "Wikipedia:VisualEditor". Wikipedia . Retrieved 15 September 2013.
  4. 1 2 3 Emil Protalinski (2013-07-02). "Wikimedia rolls out WYSIWYG visual editor for logged-in users accessing Wikipedia articles in English". The Next Web. Archived from the original on 2013-07-05. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 L.M. (2011-12-13). "Changes at Wikipedia: Seeing things" . The Economist . Archived from the original on 2013-06-09. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Tim Sampson (2012-07-04). "Will Wikipedia's pretty new editing software solve its recruitment crisis?". The Daily Dot . Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  7. 1 2 3 Andrew Orlowski (2013-09-25). "Revolting peasants force Wikipedia to cut'n'paste Visual Editor into the bin". The Register . Archived from the original on 2013-10-01. Retrieved 2013-10-06.
  8. 1 2 3 Tim Sampson (2013-09-24). "Wikipedia faces revolt over VisualEditor". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 2013-09-25. Retrieved 2013-09-25.
  9. 1 2 Forrester, James (2015-09-01). "Gradual availability of VisualEditor for new users is now complete". Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
  10. 1 2 "VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/May 2015 study". Wikimedia.org. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  11. 1 2 "MediaWiki 1.35". MediaWiki. Retrieved 2021-03-16.
  12. Martin Brinkmann (2012-02-24). "Wikipedia Visual Editor Coming Soon". ghacks . Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  13. ehe (2011-12-14). "Wikimedia testing visual editor". h-online . Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  14. Megan Garber (2012-07-12). "On the Ugliness of Wikipedia" . The Atlantic . Archived from the original on 2013-07-03. Retrieved 2013-07-29.
  15. Gene Ryan Briones (2012-06-21). "Wikimedia launches new prototype "visual editor" for Wikipedia". Ubergizmo. Archived from the original on 2013-09-29. Retrieved 2013-07-29.
  16. Jamie Keene (2011-12-15). "Wikimedia Foundation previews simplified visual editor". The Verge . Archived from the original on 2013-09-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  17. Gabriela Vatu (2013-06-06). "Wikipedia's Visual Editor to Be Rolled Out". Softpedia . Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
  18. 1 2 Simon Sharwood (2013-06-07). "Wikimedia edges closer to banishing Wikitext". The Register . Archived from the original on 2013-07-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  19. 1 2 "VisualEditor". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27.
  20. "Wikimedia Engineering 2015 Q1 Goals". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2018-10-24. Retrieved 2018-10-24.
  21. Kirkburn (June 3, 2014). "VisualEditor - the past, present and future". Wikia Community Central. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
  22. 1 2 djwm (2012-12-13). "VisualEditor launched in Wikipedia". h-online . Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  23. Sumana Harihareswara; Guillaume Paumier. "The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 2): MediaWiki". aosabook.org. Archived from the original on 2013-09-24. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
  24. "rEVED8cb070f4d7fe". phabricator.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  25. "Project:VisualEditor testing/Welcome". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on Oct 23, 2022.
  26. "wikimedia/VisualEditor". GitHub. 11 January 2022.
  27. "wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-VisualEditor". GitHub . 11 January 2022.
  28. Andrew Orlowski (2013-08-01). "Wikipedians say no to Jimmy's 'buggy' WYSIWYG editor". The Register . Archived from the original on 2013-08-04. Retrieved 2013-08-05.
  29. Simonite, Tom (October 22, 2013). "The Decline of Wikipedia: Even As More People Than Ever Rely on It, Fewer People Create It". MIT Technology Review . Archived from the original on October 23, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  30. Lucian Parfeni (2013-07-02). "Wikipedia's New VisualEditor Is the Best Update in Years and You Can Make It Better". Softpedia . Archived from the original on 2013-10-03. Retrieved 2013-07-30.
  31. "Research:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 10 August 2016.

Further reading