Zhemao hoaxes

Last updated October 07, 2024

Screenshots of two hoax Zhemao articles: Kashin silver mine (Chinese) and the Siege of Borovsk (English)

The Zhemao hoaxes were over 200 interconnected Wikipedia articles about falsified aspects of medieval Russian history written from 2012 to 2022 by Zhemao (Chinese :折毛; pinyin :Zhémáo), a pseudonymous editor of the Chinese Wikipedia. Combining research and fantasy, the articles were fictive embellishments on real entities, as Zhemao used machine translation to understand Russian-language sources and invented elaborate detail to fill gaps in the translation. It is one of Wikipedia's largest hoaxes.

Zhemao started this practice as early as 2010 on Chinese history topics but turned to Russian history, and the political interactions of medieval Slavic states in particular, in 2012. Many of her hoax articles were created to enhance her initial fabrications. Zhemao eluded detection for over a decade by faking a persona as a Russian history scholar, using sockpuppet accounts to feign support, and exploiting the community's good faith that her obscure sources matched articles' content.

Chinese novelist Yifan, having initially been intrigued by a narrative about a Kashin silver mine before finding its sources did not verify its claims, made a blog post in June 2022 explaining the web of hoax articles. Zhemao posted an apology the same month and revealed herself to have neither an advanced degree nor fluency in English or Russian. She attributed her use of sockpuppet accounts to her loneliness and absence of other social relationships. Volunteer editors blocked her accounts and quickly deleted her hoax articles though cleanup continued a month later.

History

Between 2012 and 2022, an editor using the name "折毛" created over 200 interconnected articles on the Chinese Wikipedia about fabricated events in medieval Russian history.^[1]^[2] While combining elements of research with fantasy, her work was comprehensive and cited, though some references were fake.^[1] For example, she cited Sergey Solovyov's 29-volume History of Russia from the Earliest Times, which exists, but the Chinese translation she cited does not.^[2] The web of articles centered around a "Kashin silver mine" and political ties between "princes of Tver" and "dukes of Moscow".^[3] The longest of Zhemao's hoax articles, close to a novel in length, overviewed three fabricated, 17th-century Tatar uprisings and their impact on Russia, complete with a custom map drawn by the user. Another article featured images of rare coins that she attributed to Russian archaeologists. Her work on Soviet deportations of Chinese people was vetted as a "featured article" on the Chinese Wikipedia and translated into the English, Arabic, and Russian Wikipedias.^[2] Her articles included elaborate detail on currency and eating utensils.^[3]

Zhemao's alternative histories started in 2010, with fictive embellishments about the Qing dynasty official Heshen. Two years later, she turned to Russian history topics with the biography of Alexander I before expanding to general Russian history, mainly around medieval Slavic states. Zhemao later said that her invented articles were meant to complete gaps in her initial fabrications.^[1]

Zhemao gained the community's confidence by posing as a scholar. She falsely claimed she held a Ph.D. in world history from Moscow State University, was the daughter of a Chinese diplomat in Russia, and was married to a Russian man. Her profile included a petition by her fictional husband related to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. One veteran editor of the Chinese Wikipedia, John Yip, recognized Zhemao with a Wikipedia barnstar award in early 2022 to honor her work. But Zhemao used at least four sockpuppet accounts to give her edits the appearance of outside support. In at least one instance, she conversed directly with another account she controlled. Another account presented as a Peking University doctoral student with expertise in Russian history and claimed an off-site relationship with Zhemao. Yet another account had editing history back to 2010 but entered Zhemao's control in 2019.^[2] These sockpuppet accounts also contributed false histories about the Qing dynasty and Russia under Vladimir Putin.^[1]

Detection

As the saying goes, in order to defend a lie, you must tell more lies.

Zhemao, 2022^[2]

Chinese novelist Yifan (Chinese :伊凡; pinyin :Yīfán) came upon Zhemao's Chinese Wikipedia article on a "Kashin silver mine" during research for a book and was intrigued by its detail, which included background on its social history, soil composition, and refining processes.^[2] He noticed, however, that the Russian Wikipedia equivalents of these articles either were much shorter or did not exist. The Chinese articles included people and embellishments not found in their equivalent articles on other languages' Wikipedias. A citation about medieval mining technique led to an article about modern, automated mining. Kashin existed but its silver mine did not.^[1] When Yifan asked Russian speakers to verify details, some references were found to be illegitimate, with either the pages or editions of the books nonexistent. Further investigation into Zhemao's long articles on Slavic battles also did not appear in the Russian historical record. Yifan posted his findings on the Chinese question-and-answer website Zhihu in June 2022.^[2]

Zhemao posted an apology the same month on the English Wikipedia that explained how her actions, initially innocuous, grew out of control. She explained her background as a housewife with neither an advanced degree nor fluency in English or Russian. Unable to read source material, she augmented the output of translation software with her own imagination, which grew into extended works of fiction. Zhemao attributed the sockpuppet accounts to loneliness, as imaginary friends or cosplay as parasocial relationships in the absence of other social relationships and circumstances of her husband's frequent business travel. She apologized to the Russian scholars she befriended and portrayed, and pledged to take up a craft instead of continuing with her project.^[2]

Aftermath

A cadre of Wikipedia volunteers reviewed Zhemao's edits to over 300 articles. Some consulted topical expertise to separate fact from fiction.^[2] Most of her articles were deleted the same month as Yifan's Zhihu post.^[1] Her multiple accounts were permanently blocked. Volunteers continued to review her edits a month later.^[2]

The Zhemao hoaxes were among Wikipedia's largest, having exploited a gap in standard Wikipedia good faith practices in which editors check for proper sources and obvious plagiarism but not whether obscure sources verify the article content. Chinese Wikipedia editors described regret that they deceived, abetted Zhemao, and participated in damaging the encyclopedia's already delicate reputation for reliability.^[2] Engadget likened the Zhemao hoaxes to the 2007 Essjay controversy, in which a Wikipedia editor similarly faked his stated expertise.^[4]

Multiple publications remarked on the missed opportunity of Zhemao not publishing her writing as standalone fiction, based on editor remarks on the quality and rigor of its prose.^[4]^[3] Some publications dubbed Zhemao a "Chinese Borges".^[3]^[1]^[5]

Related Research Articles

A hoax is a widely publicised falsehood created to deceive its audience with false and often astonishing information, with the either malicious or humorous intent of causing shock and interest in as many people as possible.

The English Wikipedia is the primary English-language edition of Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. It was created by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger on 15 January 2001, as Wikipedia's first edition.

The Chinese Wikipedia is the written vernacular Chinese edition of Wikipedia. It has been run by the Wikimedia Foundation since 11 May 2001.

A sock puppet is a false online identity used for deceptive purposes. The term originally referred to a hand puppet made from a sock. Sock puppets include online identities created to praise, defend, or support a person or organization, to manipulate public opinion, or to circumvent restrictions such as viewing a social media account that a user is blocked from. Sock puppets are unwelcome in many online communities and forums.

The Russian Wikipedia is the Russian-language edition of Wikipedia. As of October 2024, it has 2,003,047 articles. It was started on 11 May 2001. In October 2015, it became the sixth-largest Wikipedia by the number of articles. It has the sixth-largest number of edits (140 million). In June 2020, it was the world's sixth most visited language Wikipedia. As of September 2024, it is the third most viewed Wikipedia, after the English and Japanese editions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of Wikipedia</span> Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia

The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been criticized since its creation in 2001. Most of the criticism has been directed toward its content, community of established volunteer users, process, and rules. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of its articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias. Concerns have also been raised about systemic bias along gender, racial, political, corporate, institutional, and national lines. Conflicts of interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have also been highlighted. Further concerns include the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, clique behavior, social stratification between a guardian class and newer users, excessive rule-making, edit warring, and uneven policy application.

The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested. Wikipedia is written and edited by volunteer editors, who generate online content with the editorial oversight of other volunteer editors via community-generated policies and guidelines. The reliability of the project has been tested statistically through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in its editing process. The online encyclopedia has been criticized for its factual unreliability, principally regarding its content, presentation, and editorial processes. Studies and surveys attempting to gauge the reliability of Wikipedia have mixed results. Wikipedia's reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s but has been improved; its English-language edition has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian web brigades</span> Russian state-sponsored Internet commentators

Russian web brigades, also called Russian trolls, Russian bots, Kremlinbots, or Kremlin trolls are state-sponsored anonymous Internet political commentators and trolls linked to the Russian government. Participants report that they are organized into teams and groups of commentators that participate in Russian and international political blogs and Internet forums using sockpuppets, social bots, and large-scale orchestrated trolling and disinformation campaigns to promote pro-Putin and pro-Russian propaganda.

In May 2005, an unregistered editor posted a hoax article onto Wikipedia about journalist John Seigenthaler. The article falsely stated that Seigenthaler had been a suspect in the assassinations of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.

Censorship of Wikipedia by governments has occurred widely in countries including China, Iran, Myanmar, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela. Some instances are examples of widespread Internet censorship in general that includes Wikipedia content. Others are indicative of measures to prevent the viewing of specific content deemed offensive. The duration of different blocks has varied from hours to years.

Conflict-of-interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia occurs when editors use Wikipedia to advance the interests of their external roles or relationships. The type of COI editing that compromises Wikipedia the most is paid editing for public relations (PR) purposes. Several policies and guidelines exist to combat conflict of interest editing, including Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline and the Wikimedia Foundation's paid-contribution disclosure policy.

Wiki-PR was a consulting firm that marketed the ability to edit Wikipedia by "directly edit[ing] your page using our network of established Wikipedia editors and admins".

Jar'Edo Wens was a deliberately fictitious Wikipedia article which existed for almost 10 years before being spotted in November 2014 and deleted in March 2015. At the time, it was the longest-lasting hoax article discovered in the history of Wikipedia.

On August 31, 2015, the English Wikipedia community discovered 381 sockpuppet accounts operating an undisclosed paid editing ring. Participants in the ring extorted money from mid-sized businesses who had articles about themselves rejected by the encyclopedia's "Articles for Creation" process, in which drafts are submitted for approval to experienced editors. The ring was nicknamed "Operation Orangemoody" after the first account uncovered in the sockpuppet investigation and was Wikipedia's biggest conflict-of-interest scandal as of June 2021, exceeding the scope of the Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia incident in which approximately 250 sockpuppets were found and blocked in 2013.

Fake news websites are websites on the Internet that deliberately publish fake news—hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation purporting to be real news—often using social media to drive web traffic and amplify their effect. Unlike news satire, fake news websites deliberately seek to be perceived as legitimate and taken at face value, often for financial or political gain. Such sites have promoted political falsehoods in India, Germany, Indonesia and the Philippines, Sweden, Mexico, Myanmar, and the United States. Many sites originate in, or are promoted by, Russia, or North Macedonia among others. Some media analysts have seen them as a threat to democracy. In 2016, the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs passed a resolution warning that the Russian government was using "pseudo-news agencies" and Internet trolls as disinformation propaganda to weaken confidence in democratic values.

Fake news or information disorder is false or misleading information presented as news. Fake news often has the aim of damaging the reputation of a person or entity, or making money through advertising revenue. Although false news has always been spread throughout history, the term fake news was first used in the 1890s when sensational reports in newspapers were common. Nevertheless, the term does not have a fixed definition and has been applied broadly to any type of false information presented as news. It has also been used by high-profile people to apply to any news unfavorable to them. Further, disinformation involves spreading false information with harmful intent and is sometimes generated and propagated by hostile foreign actors, particularly during elections. In some definitions, fake news includes satirical articles misinterpreted as genuine, and articles that employ sensationalist or clickbait headlines that are not supported in the text. Because of this diversity of types of false news, researchers are beginning to favour information disorder as a more neutral and informative term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Block of Wikipedia in Russia</span>

The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia was briefly blocked in Russia in August 2015. Some articles of Wikipedia were included into various censorship lists disseminated by the government. Further threats to block were made following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

In February 2012, a group of British students edited the Wikipedia article about electric toasters and inserted the false claim that a man named Alan MacMasters invented the toaster in 1893. One of the friends created a separate article about the fictitious Alan MacMasters in February 2013 and embellished it further in the following years. The fake article was cited by newspapers and other organizations until the hoax was exposed in July 2022.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wu Peiyue (June 28, 2022). "She Spent a Decade Writing Fake Russian History. Wikipedia Just Noticed". Sixth Tone . Archived from the original on July 24, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Cheung, Rachel (July 13, 2022). "A Bored Chinese Housewife Spent Years Falsifying Russian History on Wikipedia". Vice . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
1 2 3 4 Diamond, Jonny (June 28, 2022). "A 'Chinese Borges' wrote millions of words of fake Russian history on Wikipedia for a decade". Literary Hub . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
1 2 Moon, Mariella (July 14, 2022). "A Chinese Wikipedia editor spent years writing fake Russian medieval history". Engadget . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
↑ Vereskov, Sergey (June 30, 2022). "Китайская домохозяйка 10 лет писала в Википедии фейковые статьи о России: что это было?" [A Chinese housewife has been writing fake articles about Russia on Wikipedia for 10 years: what was it?]. Psychologies (in Russian). Archived from the original on December 20, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2022.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[SixthTone-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wu Peiyue (June 28, 2022). "She Spent a Decade Writing Fake Russian History. Wikipedia Just Noticed". Sixth Tone . Archived from the original on July 24, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.

[Vice-2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Cheung, Rachel (July 13, 2022). "A Bored Chinese Housewife Spent Years Falsifying Russian History on Wikipedia". Vice . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.

[LitHub-3] 1 2 3 4 Diamond, Jonny (June 28, 2022). "A 'Chinese Borges' wrote millions of words of fake Russian history on Wikipedia for a decade". Literary Hub . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.

[Engadget-4] 1 2 Moon, Mariella (July 14, 2022). "A Chinese Wikipedia editor spent years writing fake Russian medieval history". Engadget . Archived from the original on July 17, 2022. Retrieved July 24, 2022.

[Psychologies-5] Vereskov, Sergey (June 30, 2022). "Китайская домохозяйка 10 лет писала в Википедии фейковые статьи о России: что это было?" [A Chinese housewife has been writing fake articles about Russia on Wikipedia for 10 years: what was it?]. Psychologies (in Russian). Archived from the original on December 20, 2022. Retrieved December 20, 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]