Bibliography of Wikipedia

Last updated

This is a list of books about Wikipedia or for which Wikipedia is a major subject.

Contents

Wikipedia as primary subject

Wikipedia as major non-primary subject

Wikipedia as source material

Wikipedia is free content which anybody can edit, use, modify, and distribute. Several books have used Wikipedia as source material or as their data source while others have compiled articles for artistic, educational, or commercial purposes.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Encyclopedia</span> Type of reference work

An encyclopedia or encyclopædia is a reference work or compendium providing summaries of knowledge either general or special to a particular field or discipline. Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries that are arranged alphabetically by article name or by thematic categories, or else are hyperlinked and searchable. Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most dictionaries. Generally speaking, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information concerning the subject named in the article's title; this is unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguistic information about words, such as their etymology, meaning, pronunciation, use, and grammatical forms.

Science is a rigorous, systematic endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world. Modern science is typically divided into three major branches: natural sciences, which study the physical world; the social sciences, which study individuals and societies; and the formal sciences, which study formal systems, governed by axioms and rules. There is disagreement whether the formal sciences are science disciplines, because they do not rely on empirical evidence. Applied sciences are disciplines that use scientific knowledge for practical purposes, such as in engineering and medicine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knowledge</span> Awareness of facts or being competent

Knowledge is a form of awareness or familiarity. It is often understood as awareness of facts or as practical skills, and may also mean familiarity with objects or situations. Knowledge of facts, also called propositional knowledge, is often defined as true belief that is distinct from opinion or guesswork by virtue of justification. While there is wide agreement among philosophers that propositional knowledge is a form of true belief, many controversies in philosophy focus on justification. This includes questions like whether justification is needed at all, how to understand it, and whether something else besides it is needed. These controversies intensified due to a series of thought experiments by Edmund Gettier and have provoked various alternative definitions. Some of them deny that justification is necessary and suggest alternative criteria. Others accept that justification is an essential aspect and formulate additional requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GNE (encyclopedia)</span> Former free content online encyclopedia

GNE was a project to create a free content online encyclopedia, licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, under the auspices of the Free Software Foundation. The project was proposed by Richard Stallman in December 2000 and officially started in January 2001. It was moderated by Héctor Facundo Arena, an Argentine programmer and GNU activist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theda Skocpol</span> American sociologist and political scientist (born 1947)

Theda Skocpol is an American sociologist and political scientist, who is currently the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. She is best known as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches, as well as her "state autonomy theory". She has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has been President of the American Political Science Association and the Social Science History Association.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Use of Knowledge in Society</span> 1945 scholarly article by economist Friedrich Hayek

"The Use of Knowledge in Society" is a scholarly article written by economist Friedrich Hayek, first published in the September 1945 issue of The American Economic Review.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy</span> Study of general and fundamental questions

Philosophy is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like existence, reason, knowledge, value, mind, and language. It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its own methods and assumptions.

Mona Siddiqui is a British academic. She is Professor of Islamic and Interreligious Studies at the University of Edinburgh, a member of the Commission on Scottish Devolution and a member of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. She is also a regular contributor to Thought for the Day, Sunday and The Moral Maze on BBC Radio 4, and to The Times, The Scotsman, The Guardian, Sunday Herald.

"Ignore all rules" (IAR) is a policy in the English Wikipedia. It reads: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." [emphasis in original]. The rule was proposed by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger to encourage editors to add information without focusing excessively on formatting, though Sanger later criticized the rule's effects on the community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonviolent resistance</span> Act of protest through nonviolent means

Nonviolent resistance, or nonviolent action, sometimes called civil resistance, is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, constructive program, or other methods, while refraining from violence and the threat of violence. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Larry Sanger</span> American Internet project developer and Wikipedia co-founder

Lawrence Mark Sanger is an American Internet project developer and philosopher who was the editor-in-chief of the online encyclopedia Nupedia and co-founded its successor Wikipedia along with Jimmy Wales. Sanger coined the name 'Wikipedia', and wrote many of Wikipedia's early guidelines, including the "Neutral point of view" and "Ignore all rules" policies. Sanger later worked on other encyclopedic projects, including Encyclopedia of Earth, Citizendium, and Everipedia, and advised the nonprofit American political encyclopedia Ballotpedia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nupedia</span> English-language online encyclopedia (2000–2003)

Nupedia was an English-language online encyclopedia whose articles were written by volunteer contributors with appropriate subject matter expertise, reviewed by expert editors before publication, and licensed as free content. It was founded by Jimmy Wales and underwritten by Bomis, with Larry Sanger as editor-in-chief. Nupedia operated from October 1999 until September 2003. It is best known today as the predecessor of Wikipedia. Nupedia had a seven-step approval process to control content of articles before being posted, rather than live wiki-based updating. Nupedia was designed by a committee of experts who predefined the rules. It had only 21 articles in its first year, compared to Wikipedia having 200 articles in the first month, and 18,000 in the first year.

<i>Good Faith Collaboration</i> 2010 book by Joseph Michael Reagle

Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a 2010 book by Joseph M. Reagle Jr. that deals with the topic of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community. The book was first published on August 27, 2010, through the MIT Press and has a foreword by Lawrence Lessig. The book is an ethnographic study of the history of Wikipedia, its real life and theoretical precursors, and its culture including its consensus and collaborative practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph M. Reagle Jr.</span> American academic and writer

Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. is an American academic and writer focused on digital technology and culture, including Wikipedia, online comments, geek feminism, and life hacking. He is Associate Professor of Communication Studies at Northeastern University. He was an early member of the World Wide Web Consortium, based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and in 1998 and 2010 he was a fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dariusz Jemielniak</span> Polish management academic (born 1975)

Dariusz Jemielniak is a professor of management at Kozminski University, faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, and vice-president of Polish Academy of Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathaniel Tkacz</span> Swedish-Australian scholar

Nathaniel Tkacz is a Swedish-Australian scholar of digital media who is currently Reader at the University of Warwick. His research on Wikipedia has been influential in media studies and organisational theory. Tkacz has described his work as investigating "the political, economic and organisational dimensions of technology, with a specific focus on networked and digital forms".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predictions of the end of Wikipedia</span> Theories that Wikipedia will break down or become obsolete

Various publications and commentators have offered a range of predictions of the end of Wikipedia since it rose to prominence. Multiple potential dangers have been proposed, such as a lack of quality-control and inconsistent editors/administrators.

In Wikipedia and similar wikis, an edit count is a record of the number of edits performed by a particular editor, or by all editors on a particular page. An edit, in this context, is an individually recorded change to the content of a page. Within Wikimedia projects, a number of tools exist to determine and compare edit counts, resulting in their usage for various purposes, with both positive and negative effects.

<i>Wikipedia @ 20</i> Book of essays about Wikipedia

Wikipedia @ 20 is a book of essays about Wikipedia published by the MIT Press in late 2020, marking 20 years since the creation of Wikipedia. It was edited by academic and author Joseph M. Reagle Jr. and social researcher Jackie Koerner. Contributions came from 34 other Wikipedians, Wikimedians, academics, researchers, journalists, librarians, artists and others, reflecting on particular histories and future themes in Wikipedia discussions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jason Moore (Wikipedia editor)</span> American Wikipedia editor (born 1984/1985)

Jason Moore is an American Wikipedia editor among the English Wikipedia's most active contributors by edit count. Editing since 2007 as "Another Believer", he has specialized in current events, with coverage including the COVID-19 pandemic, George Floyd protests, and the culture of Portland, Oregon, where he is based. On Wikipedia, Moore has created and developed editor affinity groups for joint work on these topics. As an organizer in the Wikimedia movement, Moore has hosted meet-ups and edit-a-thons to train new editors.

References

  1. "How Wikipedia Works [review]" (PDF). Sacramento Book Review. October 2008. p. 19. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2011.
  2. "The Charms of Wikipedia" Archived 2008-03-03 at the Wayback Machine , a review by Nicholson Baker, The New York Review of Books , Volume 55, No. 4, March 20, 2008.
  3. David Cox, "The Truth According To Wikipedia" in Evening Standard (22 October 2009)
  4. "Everybody Knows Everything" Archived 2017-08-27 at the Wayback Machine , Jeremy Philips, The Wall Street Journal , March 18, 2009
  5. "Wikipedia: Exploring Fact City" Archived 2017-03-14 at the Wayback Machine , Noam Cohen, The New York Times , March 28, 2009
  6. Bulatovic, Peja (January 14, 2011). "Wikipedia turns 10". CBC News. Archived from the original on January 7, 2019. Retrieved June 18, 2011.
  7. Solon, Olivia (January 11, 2011). "A Decade Of Wikipedia, The Poster Child For Collaboration". Wired. Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved March 5, 2017.
  8. "NKC/Knihy - Úplné zobrazení záznamu". aleph.nkp.cz. Archived from the original on 2022-08-30. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
  9. American Library Association. "Leveraging Wikipedia: Connecting Communities of Knowledge". APAstore. Archived from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  10. "How I wrote a million Wikipedia articles". Goodreads. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  11. Kakutani, Michiko (2007-06-29). "The Cult of the Amateur". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2013-03-27. Retrieved 2008-08-20.
  12. Dyson, Freeman (2011-03-10). "How We Know". The New York Review of Books. Archived from the original on 2017-07-21. Retrieved 2017-06-16.
  13. Jones, Nate (7 September 2010). "Wikipedia Entry on Iraq War Turned Into Actual Encyclopedia". time.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  14. Geere, Duncan (8 September 2010). "Which Wikipedia page has 12 volumes worth of edits?". wired.co.uk. Archived from the original on 9 July 2012. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  15. Bilton, Nick (9 September 2010). "The Story Behind a Wikipedia Entry - NYTimes.com". bits.blogs.nytimes.com. Archived from the original on 8 August 2012. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  16. Madrigal, Alexis (17 September 2010). "A Book Made from Wikipedia Edits to the 'The Iraq War' Entry". The Atlantic . Archived from the original on 25 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  17. "Hit Tumblr Mocks Wikipedia's Most Ridiculous Claims". Mashable. 6 June 2012. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-01-07.
  18. conorlstowka (June 3, 2013). "11 Most Inspiring Things Ever Published on Wikipedia". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on January 6, 2017. Retrieved August 24, 2017.
  19. Kevin Hartnett (November 29, 2013). "The most important people who ever lived". Boston Globe . Archived from the original on December 4, 2013. Retrieved December 4, 2013.
  20. Cass Sunstein (December 3, 2013). "Statistically, Who's the Greatest Person in History? Why quants can't measure historic significance". The New Republic. Archived from the original on December 5, 2013. Retrieved December 4, 2013.