List of edit wars on Wikipedia

Last updated

Representation of edit wars on Wikipedia by Czech illustrator Pavel Reisenauer [cs] Wikipedia Edit Wars.jpg
Representation of edit wars on Wikipedia by Czech illustrator Pavel Reisenauer  [ cs ]

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that allows its users to write and edit articles via wiki software, which also allows users to revert each other's edits. Conflicts between editors concerning content within articles may give rise to edit wars, in which a repeated exchange of opposing edits is published on a contested article. Some edit wars have received media and academic coverage.

Contents

Background

Wikipedia is a free, collaborative, online encyclopedia which allows its users to write and edit articles via wiki software. [1] [2] The website provides a user-friendly interface for both editing on articles and reversing other users' edits. [3] :189 Conflicts over content within articles often arise among editors, which may result in edit wars. [4] :62 An edit war is a persistent exchange of edits representing conflicting views on a contested article, [4] :62 [5] [6] or as defined by the website's policy: "when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's edits." [7] Edit wars are prohibited on Wikipedia [8] :146 and editors are encouraged to seek consensus through discussion, however administrative intervention may be applied if discussion is unfruitful in resolving the conflict. [9] Generally, edit wars are provoked by the presence of highly controversial content, [5] such as abortion or the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but can also occur due to other disputed matters, such as the nationality of artist Francis Bacon. [6]

Edit wars

Various edit wars have been received coverage outside the website, and media articles noting several such wars have been published. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]

Article Edition Start dateEnd dateDescriptionOutcomeRefs.
Gdańsk English Wikipedia December 24, 2003March 4, 2005Whether to use the German name, Danzig, or the current official name of the Polish city, Gdańsk, was a subject of dispute and edit warring.A vote was held to determine the choice of name, with 80 editors casting 657 votes in two weeks. A clear majority of votes decided on the Polish-language name on the modern city, while references to the city in the period from 1793 to 1945 would use the German name. [15] [16]
Yogurt English Wikipedia December 25, 2003c.2012Editors conflicted over the spelling used in the title of the article, with some promoting the American English yogurt and others the British English spelling yoghurt.Consensus was established in 2012 to title the article yogurt, and to note variant spellings in the article's lead sentence. [17] [18]
Nanjing Massacre English Wikipedia May 13, 2004July 25, 2004A Japanese-language translation label in the article's introducing sentence was repeatedly replaced and rewritten.A temporary consensus decided on the inclusion of 南京大虐殺 (transl.Nanjing Massacre). A second label, Nanjing Incident, was also added. [19]
Ganges English Wikipedia c.2006UnclearThe name used for the river, whether Ganges (familiar to English speakers in Western countries) or Ganga (familiar to English speakers in India) has been contested. [20] [21]
Star Trek Into Darkness [lower-alpha 1] English Wikipedia c.December 2012 [lower-alpha 2] February 21, 2013The capitalization of into in Star Trek Into Darkness was a matter of debate as some wished to have it capitalized and others preferred "Star Trek into Darkness."Consensus was reached that the article be titled Star Trek Into Darkness, with a capitalized into. [22] [23] [24]
Gamergate (harassment campaign) English Wikipedia c.August 2014c.2015Various editors accused the article covering the harassment campaign of having bias towards a feminist viewpoint.Following a decision by the Arbitration Committee of the English Wikipedia, several editors were banned from editing on articles relating to sex and gender. Although this decision did not end the edit war, the harassment campaign lost momentum during 2015. [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]
Garfield (character) English Wikipedia February 24, 2017February 27, 2017 [lower-alpha 3] The infobox of the cartoon cat Garfield, protagonist of the Garfield comic strip, was changed multiple times to indicate an indeterminate gender, after podcaster Virgil Texas claimed in a tweet that an interview of strip creator Jim Davis indicated so and subsequently updated the infobox to reflect this.The argument ended in the consensus that Garfield was male, citing four strips. Jim Davis later clarified to The Washington Post that he was indeed male. [31] [32]
Donald Trump English Wikipedia July 16, 2018July 26, 2018Various editors wished to emphasize criticism of Trump's comments during the 2018 Russia–United States summit.After a vote "which clarified little," Wikipedia admin Awilley concluded the discussion with the article noting bipartisan criticism of Trump's comments. [33] [34]
History of the Jews in Poland English Wikipedia May 15, 2019June 4, 2019A group of nationalist-aligned editors attempted to exaggerate the phenomenon of Poles returning looted Jewish property in the postwar period.After two weeks of edit warring, the nationalist group abandoned editing the article, which led to the article being corrected to show a much lower extent of property return than previously described. [35]
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood English Wikipedia July 23, 2019July 26, 2019Several editors expressed backlash over the inclusion of movie spoilers in the article's plot summary prior to a more public release. The article was also repeatedly vandalized with erroneous plot summaries.As public access to the film increased, editors swiftly resolved to include the entire plot. [36] [37] [38]
Recession English Wikipedia July 14, 2022July 30, 2022A dispute broke out among Wikipedia editors over the definition of an economic recession given in the article on that subject. Right-wing commentators accused editors on the platform of being influenced by the Biden administration's interpretation of the term, inciting further edit warring.After the page was placed under protection from edits by new users, a consensus arose to explain the varied definition of the word among scholars and in common usage. [39] [40] [41]
Yasuke English Wikipedia
Japanese Wikipedia
May 15, 2024UnclearFollowing the announcement of Yasuke as a playable character in the video game Assassin's Creed Shadows, editors conflicted on if the historical Yasuke was ever granted samurai status. [42] [43]
2024 Nuseirat rescue operation English Wikipedia June 8, 2024UnclearAn edit war erupted concerning whether an Israeli military raid during the Israel–Hamas war should be titled a "massacre" or a "rescue operation." [44] [45]
Leon Schreiber English Wikipedia June 30, 2024July 3, 2024South African politician Leon Schreiber's article was edited multiple times over his birthplace and nationality. Schreiber was born in South Africa, however several users changed the article to indicate he was born in Zimbabwe.On July 3, the article was protected from arbitrary editing and his birthplace was stated as South Africa. [46] [47]
Imane Khelif English Wikipedia July 28, 2024UnclearThe Algerian boxer's article was repeatedly edited to include the disproven claim that she had undergone a gender transition. [48]

See also

Notes

  1. Main article: Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness debate
  2. On January 2013, the Daily Dot stated that the war had raged for "nearly two months."
  3. The Washington Post states that edit warring on Garfield's gender occurred for "2½ days" before administrative intervention.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiki</span> Type of website that visitors can edit

A wiki is a form of hypertext publication on the internet which is collaboratively edited and managed by its audience directly through a web browser. A typical wiki contains multiple pages that can either be edited by the public or limited to use within an organization for maintaining its internal knowledge base.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Wikipedia</span> English-language edition of Wikipedia

The English Wikipedia is the primary English-language edition of Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. It was created by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger on 15 January 2001, as Wikipedia's first edition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jimmy Wales</span> Co-founder of Wikipedia (born 1966)

Jimmy Donal Wales, also known as Jimbo Wales, is an American Internet entrepreneur, webmaster, and former financial trader. He is a co-founder of the non-profit free encyclopedia, Wikipedia, and the for-profit wiki hosting service Fandom. He has worked on other online projects, including Bomis, Nupedia, WikiTribune, and WT Social.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of Wikipedia</span> Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia

The free online encyclopedia Wikipedia has been criticized since its creation in 2001. Most of the criticism has been directed toward its content, community of established volunteer users, process, and rules. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of its articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias. Concerns have also been raised about systemic bias along gender, racial, political, corporate, institutional, and national lines. Conflicts of interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have also been highlighted. Further concerns include the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, clique behavior, social stratification between a guardian class and newer users, excessive rule-making, edit warring, and uneven policy application.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reliability of Wikipedia</span>

The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested. Wikipedia is written and edited by volunteer editors, who generate online content with the editorial oversight of other volunteer editors via community-generated policies and guidelines. The reliability of the project has been tested statistically through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in its editing process. The online encyclopedia has been criticized for its factual unreliability, principally regarding its content, presentation, and editorial processes. Studies and surveys attempting to gauge the reliability of Wikipedia have mixed results. Wikipedia's reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s but has been improved; its English-language edition has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edit conflict</span> Computer problem

An edit conflict is a computer problem that may occur when multiple editors edit the same file and cannot merge without losing part or all of their edit. The conflict occurs when an editor gets a copy of a shared document file, changes the copy, and attempts to save the changes to the original file, which has been altered by another editor after the copy was obtained.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japanese Wikipedia</span> Japanese-language edition of Wikipedia

The Japanese Wikipedia is the Japanese edition of Wikipedia, a free, open-source online encyclopedia. Started on 11 May 2001, the edition attained the 200,000 article mark in April 2006 and the 500,000 article mark in June 2008. As of September 2024, it has almost 1,431,000 articles with 12,593 active contributors, ranking fourth behind the English, French and German editions.

Wikipedia has been studied extensively. Between 2001 and 2010, researchers published at least 1,746 peer-reviewed articles about the online encyclopedia. Such studies are greatly facilitated by the fact that Wikipedia's database can be downloaded without help from the site owner.

Deletionism and inclusionism are opposing philosophies that largely developed within the community of volunteer editors of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. The terms reflect differing opinions on the appropriate scope of the encyclopedia and corresponding tendencies either to delete or to include a given encyclopedia article.

A series of incidents in 2009 led to Church of Scientology–owned networks being blocked from making edits to Wikipedia articles relating to Scientology. The Church of Scientology has long had a controversial history on the Internet and had initiated campaigns to manipulate material and remove information critical of itself from the web. From early in Wikipedia's history, conflict arose regarding the website's coverage of Scientology. Disputes began in earnest in 2005, with users disagreeing about whether or not to describe Scientology as an abusive cult or religion, and continued through the decade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of Wikipedia</span> Overview and topical guide to the free online crowdsourced encyclopedia

The following outline is provided as an overview of and a topical guide to Wikipedia:

Conflict-of-interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia occurs when editors use Wikipedia to advance the interests of their external roles or relationships. The type of COI editing that compromises Wikipedia the most is paid editing for public relations (PR) purposes. Several policies and guidelines exist to combat conflict of interest editing, including Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline and the Wikimedia Foundation's paid-contribution disclosure policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender bias on Wikipedia</span> Gender gap problem in Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects

Gender bias on Wikipedia includes various gender-related disparities on Wikipedia, particularly the overrepresentation of men among both volunteer contributors and article subjects, as well as lesser coverage of and topics primarily of interest to women.

A WikiProject, or Wikiproject, is an affinity group for contributors with shared goals within the Wikimedia movement. WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki, Wikipedia, and exist to varying degrees within sibling projects such as Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikidata, and Wikisource. They also exist in different languages, and translation of articles is a form of their collaboration.

<i>The Signpost</i> English Wikipedias newspaper

The Signpost is the English Wikipedia's online newspaper. Managed by the volunteer community, it is published online with contributions from Wikimedia editors. The newspaper's scope includes the Wikimedia community and events related to Wikipedia, including Arbitration Committee rulings, Wikimedia Foundation issues, and other Wikipedia-related projects. It was founded in January 2005 by Wikipedian Michael Snow, who continued as a contributor until his February 2008 appointment to the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.

CheckUser is a function of a wiki that investigates the IP addresses of a account to enforce blocks. Together with manual inspection, it assists in uncovering illegitimate behavior such as spam. This protects the wiki from disruption by any particular group or individual. It can also show all edits from an IP including those by registered users.

Ideological bias on Wikipedia, especially in its English-language edition, has been the subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political, religious, or other ideologies its volunteer editors may adhere to. These all draw concerns as to the possible effects this may have on the encyclopedia's reliability.

Wikimedia in India refers to all the Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects which are of special interest to people in India or interested in topics relating to India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict</span> Coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict on Wikipedia

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been covered extensively on Wikipedia. This coverage has often been criticized for perceived bias. External groups have initiated editing campaigns, and the Israel–Hamas war intensified editing in the topic-area. Wikipedia coverage on the conflict differs significantly between the encyclopedia's language-versions.

References

  1. Butterfield, Andrew; Ngondi, Gerard Ekembe; Kerr, Anne (January 21, 2016), Butterfield, Andrew; Ngondi, Gerard Ekembe; Kerr, Anne (eds.), "Wikipedia", A Dictionary of Computer Science, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0-19-968897-5 , retrieved July 21, 2024
  2. McArthur, Tom; Lam-McArthur, Jacqueline; Fontaine, Lise (May 24, 2018), McArthur, Tom; Lam-McArthur, Jacqueline; Fontaine, Lise (eds.), "Wikipedia", The Oxford Companion to the English Language, Oxford University Press, ISBN   978-0-19-966128-2 , retrieved July 21, 2024
  3. He, Zeyi (January 12, 2015). Digital By-Product Data in Web 2.0: Exploring Mass Collaboration of Wikipedia. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4438-7358-1.
  4. 1 2 Jemielniak, Dariusz (May 14, 2014). Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University Press. ISBN   978-0-8047-9120-5.
  5. 1 2 Ayers, Phoebe; Matthews, Charles; Yates, Ben (2008). How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it. No Starch Press. p. 384. ISBN   978-1-59327-176-3.
  6. 1 2 O'Sullivan, Dan (February 11, 2016). Wikipedia: A New Community of Practice?. Routledge. p. 124. ISBN   978-1-134-76624-6.
  7. Rutten, Ellen; Fedor, Julie; Zvereva, Vera, eds. (April 12, 2013). Memory, Conflict and New Media: Web Wars in Post-Socialist States (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203083635-11. ISBN   978-0-203-08363-5.
  8. Thomas, Paul A. (September 15, 2022). Inside Wikipedia: How It Works and How You Can Be an Editor. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-1-5381-6322-1.
  9. Levene, Mark (January 14, 2011). An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-118-06034-6.
  10. Edwards, Phil (September 17, 2015). "Wikipedia's lamest edit wars show why the site is amazing and infuriating". Vox.com . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  11. Dvorak, John C. (July 18, 2013). "Wikipedia's Edit Wars". PCMag . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  12. Gross, Doug (July 14, 2013). "Wiki wars: The 10 most controversial Wikipedia pages". CNN . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  13. "Wiki wars: Do Wikipedia's internal tiffs deter newcomers?". BBC News. August 5, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  14. Daw, David (July 25, 2011). "Wikipedia Wars: 10 Biggest Edit Battles". PC World . ISSN   0737-8939. OCLC   1117065657 . Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  15. Lih, Andrew (March 17, 2009). The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. Hachette Books. pp. 122–130. ISBN   978-1-4013-9585-8.
  16. Fuchs, Christian (February 25, 2017). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE. Wikipedia Edit Wars and Vandalism. ISBN   978-1-4739-8824-8.
  17. Dale, Brady (August 18, 2015). "Wikipedia's Culture War: A Decade-Long Fight Over How to Spell 'Yogurt'". Observer.com . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  18. Yau, Nathan (June 26, 2024). "Decade-Long Battle for "Yogurt" vs. "Yoghurt" on Wikipedia". FlowingData . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  19. Li, Hongtao; Huang, Shunming (August 24, 2021). The Nanjing Massacre and the Making of Mediated Trauma. Routledge. 6.4.2 Confrontation over the “Introduction”: the writing politics of a Wikipedia entry. ISBN   978-1-000-42786-8.
  20. Kumar, Sangeet (May 25, 2021). The Digital Frontier: Infrastructures of Control on the Global Web. Indiana University Press. p. 93. ISBN   978-0-253-05650-4.
  21. Kumar, Sangeet (June 3, 2017). "A river by any other name: Ganga/Ganges and the postcolonial politics of knowledge on Wikipedia". Information, Communication & Society. 20 (6): 809–824. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709. ISSN   1369-118X.
  22. Morris, Kevin (February 12, 2013). "That epic Wikipedia "Star Trek" edit is still screwing up Google". Daily Dot . Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  23. Morris, Kevin (January 30, 2013). "Wikipedians wage war over a capital "I" in a "Star Trek" film". Daily Dot . Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  24. Lindbergh, Ben (January 15, 2021). "The Fight to Win the Pettiest Edit Wars on Wikipedia". The Ringer . Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  25. Hern, Alex (January 23, 2015). "Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  26. Hube, Christoph (2017). "Bias in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW '17 Companion. ACM Press. pp. 717–721. doi:10.1145/3041021.3053375. ISBN   978-1-4503-4914-7.
  27. Salor, Enrinc (March 13, 2016). "Neutrality in the Face of Reckless Hate : Wikipedia and GamerGate". Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling (in Danish). 5 (1): 23–29. doi: 10.7146/ntik.v5i1.25880 . ISSN   2245-294X.
  28. Flöck, Fabian; Laniado, David; Stadthaus, Felix; Acosta, Maribel (2015). "Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development — the Use Case of "Gamergate Controversy"". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 9 (5): 48–55. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i5.14701. ISSN   2334-0770.
  29. Robertson, Adi (January 28, 2015). "Wikipedia denies 'purging' feminist editors over Gamergate debate". The Verge . Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  30. Mortensen, Torill Elvira; Sihvonen, Tanja (2020). "Negative Emotions Set in Motion: The Continued Relevance of #GamerGate". The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 1–23. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_75-1. ISBN   978-3-319-90307-1 . Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  31. Schmall, Tyler (March 17, 2017). "The great Garfield gender debate ends after Wikipedia edit war". Mashable . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  32. Cavna, Michael; Selk, Avi (March 1, 2017). "Garfield's a boy … right? How a cartoon cat's gender identity launched a Wikipedia war". The Washington Post . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  33. Mak, Aaron (May 28, 2019). "Donald Trump's Wikipedia Entry Is a War Zone". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  34. Ford, Heather (October 13, 2020), Reagle, Joseph; Koerner, Jackie (eds.), "Rise of the Underdog", Wikipedia @ 20, The MIT Press, pp. 189–202, doi:10.7551/mitpress/12366.003.0017, ISBN   978-0-262-36059-3 , retrieved July 22, 2024
  35. Grabowski, Jan; Klein, Shira (April 3, 2023). "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust". The Journal of Holocaust Research. 37 (2): 133–190. doi: 10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939 . ISSN   2578-5648.
  36. Robertson, Adi (July 30, 2019). "A Wikipedia spoiler war created a ridiculous fake ending for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood". The Verge . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  37. Tyler, Adrienne (March 14, 2020). "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood's Fake Ending Controversy Explained". ScreenRant. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  38. Nicholson, Tom (July 31, 2019). "There's Been A Huge Fight Over The 'Once Upon A Time In Hollywood' Wiki Page". Esquire.com . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  39. Bowman, Emma (July 30, 2022). "What is a recession? Wikipedia can't decide". NPR . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  40. Breslow, Samuel (August 11, 2022). "How a False Claim About Wikipedia Sparked a Right-Wing Media Frenzy". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  41. Dress, Brad (August 2, 2022). "Wikipedia launching new restrictions for users editing 'recession' page". Thehill.com . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  42. Easby, Ryan (May 17, 2024). "Assassin's Creed Shadows 'critics' have started vandalising IRL protagonist Yasuke's Wiki page". GAMINGBible . Archived from the original on May 24, 2024. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
  43. Moore, Alexander (May 16, 2024). "People Are Vandalizing the Wikipedia Page for Assassin's Creed Shadows Protagonist Yasuke". Game Rant . Archived from the original on May 17, 2024. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
  44. Oxford, Dwayne; Shamim, Sarah (June 14, 2024). "Wikipedia war: Fierce row erupts over Israel's deadly Nuseirat assault". Al Jazeera . Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  45. "Wikipedia article on Israeli army's Nuseirat massacre in Gaza sparks edit war, restrictions". The New Arab . June 15, 2024. Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  46. Alexander, Mary (July 4, 2024). "Wikipedia edit war not proof that South Africa's new home affairs minister Leon Schreiber is 'a Zimbabwean foreigner'". Africa Check . Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  47. Davis, Rebecca (July 3, 2024). "Fact Check: Is SA's new Home Affairs minister Zimbabwean?". Daily Maverick . Archived from the original on July 3, 2024. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
  48. Berra, Valerio (August 2, 2024). "Perché la pagina Wikipedia della pugile Imane Khelif ha subito oltre 200 "modifiche" in questi giorni". Fanpage.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on August 21, 2024. Retrieved September 4, 2024.