Good Faith Collaboration

Last updated

Good Faith Collaboration
Good Faith Collaboration.jpg
AuthorJoseph M. Reagle Jr.
LanguageEnglish
SubjectWikipedia
GenreEthnography
Publisher MIT Press
Publication date
2010
Pages256
ISBN 978-0-262-01447-2
Followed by Reading the Comments  

Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a 2010 book by Joseph M. Reagle Jr. that deals with the topic of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community. The book was first published on August 27, 2010, through the MIT Press and has a foreword by Lawrence Lessig. The book is an ethnographic study of the history of Wikipedia, its real life and theoretical precursors, and its culture including its consensus and collaborative practices.

Contents

The book has been described as a pioneering ethnographic study of the culture of Wikipedia. [1] [2] Reagle's main thesis has been summarized as the argument that "the success of Wikipedia may be less technological than a consequence of the community of Wikipedians and their cultural norms". [3]

History of publication

Good Faith Collaboration is based on Reagle's PhD dissertation. [4] Reagle, the book's author, is a scholar specializing in sociology of the Internet, as well as a Wikipedia volunteer. [5] In writing the book, Reagle relied on documents produced by the Wikipedia community, such as "content pages, discussion pages, mailing lists, newsletters, and meet-ups". [6]

The book was published in 2010 by MIT Press. [6] In September 2011, the Web edition of the book was released under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license and Japanese language translation was made on GitHub. [7] [8]

Synopsis

The book is composed of 8 chapters with a foreword by Lawrence Lessig. [2] [9] [10]

The book opens with Chapter 1, "Nazis and Norms", which provides an overview of the text, and the author's methodology. [3] In Chapter 2, "The Pursuit of the Universal Encyclopedia", Reagle explores the history of encyclopedias and of community collaboration, focusing on the 20th century onward. Reagle mentions specific examples such as H.G. Wells' World Brain , Paul Otlet's Universal Repository, and the collaborative practices of Quakers. [1] [3] [6]

Chapter 3, "Good Faith Collaboration", and Chapter 4, "The Puzzle of Openness", begin the ethnographic parts of the book. [3] They discuss reasons why Wikipedia has met its intended purpose; these reasons include the effects of the project's core policies, such as neutral point of view, no original research, and verifiability, all made possible due to the "good faith", represented by virtues such as "assuming the best of others, patience, civility, and humor". [6] [9] The book's title itself alludes to the Wikipedia policy "Assume Good Faith" (AGF); Reagle argues that this policy has been a key to the Wikipedia project's success. [2] [11] [12] [13] Chapter 4 also addresses issues of licensing, as well as whether everything on Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, and the options for those who disagree (such as forking). [3]

The next two chapters focus on the decision-making process within Wikipedia. [3] Chapter 5, "The Challenges of Consensus", discusses the nature of consensus decision making within Wikipedia. Chapter 6, "The Benevolent Dictator", discusses the role of Jimbo Wales, the project's co-founder, as well as other less famous elements of Wikipedia's hierarchy, such as administrators, the Arbitration Committee, and the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees. [3] [11]

In Chapter 7, "Encyclopedic Anxiety", Reagle analyzes the popular and critical discussion of Wikipedia, including those of concerns about the prevalent "amateurism" of the project. [3] [6] [11]

Reception

William S. Kowinski, in a review of the book for the North Coast Journal published in 2010, wrote that "What this book does well is describe how Wikipedia works and what issues have arisen... this may remain the best opportunity for learning about this remarkable project." [1]

Cory Doctorow, in a 2010 review on the Boing Boing portal, said that Reagle "offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself – rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the project". [5]

The book was also reviewed by R. Stuart Geiger for The Wikipedia Signpost that year. He commended the author on his involvement in the Wikipedia project, which has allowed him to create a work that "goes well beyond most accounts written about Wikipedia, insisting on studying Wikipedians both on and in their own terms." Geiger concluded that the book "is well-written, well-sourced, and neutral; something I'd recommend for my mother." He also noted that the book had been praised by the then-director of the Wikimedia Foundation, Sue Gardner, on her blog. [12] [14]

Humphreys Lee, reviewing the book for the Journal of Communication in 2011, noted that it is a welcome addition to the body of ethnographic literature about new digital media. She noted that the book focuses on the production, not consumption of Wikipedia and stressed the historical importance of the wiki technology which was necessary for the development of the Wikipedia project. She concluded that the book "is an important contribution to understanding the collaborative culture of media production and the open content community". [6]

Jeff Loveland, in his review published in 2011 in Annals of Science , wrote that the book has "one major weakness, namely in historical contextualization", but praised it as a de facto introduction to Wikipedia, exploring the "insightful and worthwhile" topic of ethnography of Wikipedia. [3]

Paul Youngquist, in his 2011 review for symploke, noted that the book is worthy to recommend "to anyone interested in the history of infotech and its new forms of collective agency". [15]

José-Carlos Redondo-Olmedilla, reviewing the book for The Information Society in 2012, wrote "Reagle's book on the culture of Wikipedia gives an accurate account of this sociocultural and sociotechnological phenomenon that Wikipedia is" and concluded that "it is definitely an excellent read and an accomplished exercise of transparency". [9]

Olivia Auxier, writing a review for the International Journal of Communication in 2013, noted that "Reagle’s book is mostly descriptive but does offer some theoretical ideas about the issues Wikipedia faced early on and that it will continue to confront". [11]

Mayo Fuster Morell, in her 2013 review in the Information, Communication & Society , commended Reagle's book for pioneering the study of Wikipedia using an ethnographic approach, "particularly in terms of its cultural and historical specificity". [2]

Craig Hight, in his 2013 review for Media International Australia, concluded that "this is a detailed and persuasive analysis of the nature of the Wikipedia community, and a valuable addition to critical and reflective accounts of the technological, social and political dimensions of contemporary media platforms". [16]

Piotr Konieczny, reviewing the book for Social Forces in 2014, wrote that while the book might not address all possible aspects of the Wikipedia project, it "has earned itself a place of a classic in the studies of Wikipedia, and, likely, in the bookshelves dedicated to the open content communities and online ethnography". [13]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MeatballWiki</span> Wiki dedicated to online communities

MeatballWiki is a wiki dedicated to online communities, network culture, and hypermedia. Containing a record of experience on running wikis, it is intended for "discussion about wiki philosophy, wiki culture, instructions and observations."

Interpedia was one of the first-proposed online encyclopedia which would allow anyone to contribute by writing articles and submitting them to the central catalogue of all Interpedia pages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GNE (encyclopedia)</span> Former free online encyclopedia

GNE was a project to create a free-content online encyclopedia, licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, under the auspices of the Free Software Foundation. The project was proposed by Richard Stallman in December 2000 and officially started in January 2001. It was moderated by Héctor Facundo Arena, an Argentine programmer and GNU activist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benjamin Mako Hill</span> Debian hacker, intellectual property researcher, activist and author

Benjamin Mako Hill is a free software activist, hacker, author, and professor. He is a contributor and free software developer as part of the Debian and Ubuntu projects as well as the co-author of three technical manuals on the subject, Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 Bible, The Official Ubuntu Server Book, and The Official Ubuntu Book.

"Ignore all rules" (IAR) is a policy used on Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. The English Wikipedia policy reads: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." [emphasis in original]. The rule was proposed by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger to encourage editors to add information without focusing excessively on formatting, though Sanger later criticized the rule's effects on the community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikiversity</span> Wikimedia wiki for learning materials

Wikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project that supports learning communities, their learning materials, and resulting activities. It differs from Wikipedia in that it offers tutorials and other materials for the fostering of learning, rather than an encyclopedia. It is available in many languages.

This is a list of books about Wikipedia or for which Wikipedia is a major subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julien Cain</span> French librarian

Julien Cain was the general administrator of the Bibliothèque nationale de France before the Occupation of France by Nazi Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph M. Reagle Jr.</span> American academic and writer (born 1972)

Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. is an American academic and writer focused on digital technology and culture, including Wikipedia, online comments, geek feminism, and life hacking. He is an associate professor of communication studies at Northeastern University. He was an early member of the World Wide Web Consortium, based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and in 1998 and 2010 he was a fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

Cyber-utopianism, web-utopianism, digital utopianism, or utopian internet is a subcategory of technological utopianism and the belief that online communication helps bring about a more decentralized, democratic, and libertarian society. The desired values may also be privacy and anonymity, freedom of expression, access to culture and information or also socialist ideals leading to digital socialism.

The World Congress of Universal Documentation was held from 16 to 21 August 1937 in Paris, France. Delegates from 45 countries met to discuss means by which all of the world's information, in print, in manuscript, and in other forms, could be efficiently organized and made accessible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WikiConference India</span> Wikipedia conference in India

WikiConference India is a national Wikipedia conference organised in India. The first WikiConference India conference was held in November 2011, in Mumbai, the capital of the Indian state of Maharashtra. It was organised by the Mumbai Wikipedia community in partnership with Wikimedia India Chapter with the support of the Wikimedia Foundation. The conference is positioned as the annual national flagship event for Wikimedia in India and is open to participation from citizens of all nations. The focus is on matters concerning India on Wikipedia projects and other sister projects in English and other Indian folk languages. WikiConference India 2023 took place in Hyderabad from 28 to 30 April 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dariusz Jemielniak</span> Polish management academic (born 1975)

Dariusz Jemielniak is a professor of management at Kozminski University, faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, and vice-president of Polish Academy of Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender bias on Wikipedia</span> Gender gap problem in Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects

Gender bias on Wikipedia includes various gender-related disparities on Wikipedia, particularly the overrepresentation of men among both volunteer contributors and article subjects, as well as lesser coverage of and topics primarily of interest to women.

<i>Common Knowledge?</i> 2014 book by Dariusz Jemielniak

Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia is a 2014 book about Wikipedia's community of contributors. The author is Dariusz Jemielniak, who is a Wikipedia contributor himself.

<i>The Signpost</i> English Wikipedias newspaper

The Signpost is the English Wikipedia's online newspaper. Managed by the volunteer community, it is published online with contributions from Wikimedia editors. The newspaper's scope includes the Wikimedia community and events related to Wikipedia, including Arbitration Committee rulings, Wikimedia Foundation issues, and other Wikipedia-related projects. It was founded in January 2005 by Wikipedian Michael Snow, who continued as a contributor until his February 2008 appointment to the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predictions of the end of Wikipedia</span> Theories that Wikipedia will break down or become obsolete

Various observers have predicted the end of Wikipedia since it rose to prominence, with potential pitfalls from lack of quality-control or inconsistencies among contributors.

In Wikipedia and similar wikis, an edit count is a record of the number of edits performed by a certain editor, or by all editors on a particular page. An edit, in this context, is an individually recorded change to the content of a page. Within Wikimedia projects, a number of tools exist to determine and compare edit counts, resulting in their usage for various purposes, with both positive and negative effects.

<i>Wikipedia @ 20</i> Book of essays about Wikipedia

Wikipedia @ 20 is a book of essays about Wikipedia published by the MIT Press in late 2020, marking 20 years since the creation of Wikipedia. It was edited by academic and author Joseph M. Reagle Jr. and social researcher Jackie Koerner. Contributions came from 34 other Wikipedians, Wikimedians, academics, researchers, journalists, librarians, artists and others, reflecting on particular histories and future themes in Wikipedia discussions.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Kowinski, William (December 30, 2010). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". North Coast Journal .
  2. 1 2 3 4 Morell, Mayo Fuster (February 1, 2013). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". Information, Communication & Society. 16 (1): 146–147. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.602092. ISSN   1369-118X. S2CID   144537283.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Loveland, Jeff (October 1, 2011). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". Annals of Science. 68 (4): 555–558. doi:10.1080/00033790.2011.564297. ISSN   0003-3790. S2CID   145269418.
  4. Madrigal, Alexis (October 19, 2010). "In Rancorous Times, Can Wikipedia Show Us How to All Get Along?". The Atlantic .
  5. 1 2 Doctorow, Cory (December 20, 2010). "Good Faith Collaboration: How Wikipedia works". Boing Boing.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lee, Humphreys (April 1, 2011). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". Journal of Communication . 61 (2): E1–E4. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01545.x.
  7. "Open Codex by Joseph Reagle". reagle.org.
  8. "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia (『善意にもとづく共同作業:ウィキペディアの文化』) – Good Faith Collaboration 日本語訳". good-faith-collaboration-ja.github.io. Retrieved December 14, 2021.
  9. 1 2 3 Redondo-Olmedilla, José-Carlos (January 1, 2012). "A Review of "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia"". The Information Society. 28 (1): 53–54. doi:10.1080/01972243.2011.632286. ISSN   0197-2243. S2CID   32818420.
  10. "Foreword". reagle.org. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Auxier, Olivia (November 13, 2013). "Joseph Michael Reagle, Jr., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". International Journal of Communication. 7: 3. ISSN   1932-8036.
  12. 1 2 Geiger, R. Stuart (October 4, 2010). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, by Joseph Reagle". The Signpost.
  13. 1 2 Konieczny, Piotr (September 1, 2014). "Good Faith Collaboration By Joseph Micheal Reagle Jr. MIT Press. 2010, 244 pages. $27.95 cloth". Social Forces. 93 (1): e17. doi:10.1093/sf/sos100. ISSN   0037-7732.
  14. "What Wikimedia can learn from the Quakers, Part 2". Sue Gardner's Blog. September 20, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2020.
  15. Youngquist, Paul (2011). "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia (review)". Symploke. 19 (1): 390–392. ISSN   1534-0627.
  16. Hight, Craig (November 2013). "Book Review: Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia". Media International Australia. 149 (1): 200–201. doi:10.1177/1329878X1314900133. ISSN   1329-878X. S2CID   150093045.
Further reviews: