Triangulation (topology)

Last updated
A triangulated torus Torus-triang.png
A triangulated torus
Another triangulation of the torus A triangulation of the torus, with bounding box fixed.svg
Another triangulation of the torus
A triangulated dolphin shape Dolphin triangle mesh.svg
A triangulated dolphin shape

In mathematics, triangulation describes the replacement of topological spaces by piecewise linear spaces, i.e. the choice of a homeomorphism in a suitable simplicial complex. Spaces being homeomorphic to a simplicial complex are called triangulable. Triangulation has various uses in different branches of mathematics, for instance in algebraic topology, in complex analysis or in modeling.

Contents

Motivation

On the one hand, it is sometimes useful to forget about superfluous information of topological spaces: The replacement of the original spaces with simplicial complexes may help to recognize crucial properties and to gain a better understanding of the considered object.

On the other hand, simplicial complexes are objects of combinatorial character and therefore one can assign them quantities rising from their combinatorial pattern, for instance, the Euler characteristic. Triangulation allows now to assign such quantities to topological spaces.

Investigations concerning the existence and uniqueness of triangulations established a new branch in topology, namely the piecewise-linear-topology (short PL-topology). Its main purpose is topological properties of simplicial complexes and its generalization, cell-complexes.

Simplicial complexes

Abstract simplicial complexes

An abstract simplicial complex above a set is a system of non-empty subsets such that:

The elements of are called simplices, the elements of are called vertices. A simplex with vertices has dimension by definition. The dimension of an abstract simplicial complex is defined as . [1]

Abstract simplicial complexes can be thought of as geometrical objects too. This requires the term of geometric simplex.

Geometric simplices in dimension 1, 2 and 3 Geometric simplices in dimension 1,2 and 3.png
Geometric simplices in dimension 1, 2 and 3

Geometric simplices

Let be affinely independent points in , i.e. the vectors are linearly independent. The set is said to be the simplex spanned by . It has dimension by definition. The points are called the vertices of , the simplices spanned by of the vertices are called faces and the boundary is defined to be the union of its faces.

The -dimensional standard-simplex is the simplex spanned by the unit vectors [2]

Geometric simplicial complexes

A geometric simplicial complex is a collection of geometric simplices such that

The union of all the simplices in gives the set of points of , denoted This set is endowed with a topology by choosing the closed sets to be is closed for all. Note that, in general, this topology is not the same as the subspace topology that inherits from . The topologies do coincide in the case that each point in the complex lies only in finitely many simplices. [2]

Each geometric complex can be associated with an abstract complex by choosing as a ground set the set of vertices that appear in any simplex of and as system of subsets the subsets of which correspond to vertex sets of simplices in .

A natural question is if vice versa, any abstract simplicial complex corresponds to a geometric complex. In general, the geometric construction as mentioned here is not flexible enough: consider for instance an abstract simplicial complex of infinite dimension. However, the following more abstract construction provides a topological space for any kind of abstract simplicial complex:

Let be an abstract simplicial complex above a set . Choose a union of simplices , but each in of dimension sufficiently large, such that the geometric simplex is of dimension if the abstract geometric simplex has dimension . If , can be identified with a face of and the resulting topological space is the gluing Effectuating the gluing for each inclusion, one ends up with the desired topological space.

A 2-dimensional geometric simplicial complex with vertex V, link(V), and star(V) are highlighted in red and pink. Star link of vertex.png
A 2-dimensional geometric simplicial complex with vertex V, link(V), and star(V) are highlighted in red and pink.

As in the previous construction, by the topology induced by gluing, the closed sets in this space are the subsets that are closed in the subspace topology of every simplex in the complex.

The simplicial complex which consists of all simplices of dimension is called the -th skeleton of .

A natural neighbourhood of a vertex in a simplicial complex is considered to be given by the star of a simplex, whose boundary is the link .

Simplicial maps

The maps considered in this category are simplicial maps: Let , be abstract simplicial complexes above sets , . A simplicial map is a function which maps each simplex in onto a simplex in . By affine-linear extension on the simplices, induces a map between the geometric realizations of the complexes. [2]

Examples

Definition

A triangulation of a topological space is a homeomorphism where is a simplicial complex. Topological spaces do not necessarily admit a triangulation and if they do, it is not necessarily unique.

Examples

The 2-dimensional sphere and a triangulation Sphere triangulated2.png
The 2-dimensional sphere and a triangulation

Invariants

Triangulations of spaces allow assigning combinatorial invariants rising from their dedicated simplicial complexes to spaces. These are characteristics that equal for complexes that are isomorphic via a simplicial map and thus have the same combinatorial pattern.

This data might be useful to classify topological spaces up to homeomorphism but only given that the characteristics are also topological invariants, meaning, they do not depend on the chosen triangulation. For the data listed here, this is the case. [4] For details and the link to singular homology, see topological invariance.

Homology

Via triangulation, one can assign a chain complex to topological spaces that arise from its simplicial complex and compute its simplicial homology . Compact spaces always admit finite triangulations and therefore their homology groups are finitely generated and only finitely many of them do not vanish. Other data as Betti-numbers or Euler characteristic can be derived from homology.

Betti-numbers and Euler-characteristics

Let be a finite simplicial complex. The -th Betti-number is defined to be the rank of the -th simplicial homology group of the spaces. These numbers encode geometric properties of the spaces: The Betti-number for instance represents the number of connected components. For a triangulated, closed orientable surfaces , holds where denotes the genus of the surface: Therefore its first Betti-number represents the doubled number of handles of the surface. [5]

With the comments above, for compact spaces all Betti-numbers are finite and almost all are zero. Therefore, one can form their alternating sum

which is called the Euler characteristic of the complex, a catchy topological invariant.

Topological invariance

To use these invariants for the classification of topological spaces up to homeomorphism one needs invariance of the characteristics regarding homeomorphism.

A famous approach to the question was at the beginning of the 20th century the attempt to show that any two triangulations of the same topological space admit a common subdivision. This assumption is known as Hauptvermutung ( German: Main assumption). Let be a simplicial complex. A complex is said to be a subdivision of iff:

Those conditions ensure that subdivisions does not change the simplicial complex as a set or as a topological space. A map between simplicial complexes is said to be piecewise linear if there is a refinement of such that is piecewise linear on each simplex of . Two complexes that correspond to another via piecewise linear bijection are said to be combinatorial isomorphic. In particular, two complexes that have a common refinement are combinatorially equivalent. Homology groups are invariant to combinatorial equivalence and therefore the Hauptvermutung would give the topological invariance of simplicial homology groups. In 1918, Alexander introduced the concept of singular homology. Henceforth, most of the invariants arising from triangulation were replaced by invariants arising from singular homology. For those new invariants, it can be shown that they were invariant regarding homeomorphism and even regarding homotopy equivalence. [6] Furthermore it was shown that singular and simplicial homology groups coincide. [6] This workaround has shown the invariance of the data to homeomorphism. Hauptvermutung lost in importance but it was initial for a new branch in topology: The piecewise linear topology (short PL-topology). [7]

Hauptvermutung

The Hauptvermutung (German for main conjecture) states that two triangulations always admit a common subdivision. Originally, its purpose was to prove invariance of combinatorial invariants regarding homeomorphisms. The assumption that such subdivisions exist in general is intuitive, as subdivision are easy to construct for simple spaces, for instance for low dimensional manifolds. Indeed the assumption was proven for manifolds of dimension and for differentiable manifolds but it was disproved in general: [8] An important tool to show that triangulations do not admit a common subdivision. i. e their underlying complexes are not combinatorially isomorphic is the combinatorial invariant of Reidemeister torsion.

Reidemeister-torsion

To disprove the Hauptvermutung it is helpful to use combinatorial invariants which are not topological invariants. A famous example is Reidemeister-torsion. It can be assigned to a tuple of CW-complexes: If this characteristic will be a topological invariant but if in general not. An approach to Hauptvermutung was to find homeomorphic spaces with different values of Reidemeister-torsion. This invariant was used initially to classify lens-spaces and first counterexamples to the Hauptvermutung were built based on lens-spaces: [8]

Classification of lens-spaces

In its original formulation, lens spaces are 3-manifolds, constructed as quotient spaces of the 3-sphere: Let be natural numbers, such that are coprime. The lens space is defined to be the orbit space of the free group action

.

For different tuples , lens spaces will be homotopy-equivalent but not homeomorphic. Therefore they can't be distinguished with the help of classical invariants as the fundamental group but by the use of Reidemeister-torsion.

Two lens spaces are homeomorphic, if and only if . [9] This is the case iff two lens spaces are simple-homotopy-equivalent. The fact can be used to construct counterexamples for the Hauptvermutung as follows. Suppose there are spaces derived from non-homeomorphic lens spaces having different Reidemeister torsion. Suppose further that the modification into does not affect Reidemeister torsion but such that after modification and are homeomorphic. The resulting spaces will disprove the Hauptvermutung.

Existence of triangulation

Besides the question of concrete triangulations for computational issues, there are statements about spaces that are easier to prove given that they are simplicial complexes. Especially manifolds are of interest. Topological manifolds of dimension are always triangulable [10] [11] [1] but there are non-triangulable manifolds for dimension , for arbitrary but greater than three. [12] [13] Further, differentiable manifolds always admit triangulations. [3]

Piecewise linear structures

Manifolds are an important class of spaces. It is natural to require them not only to be triangulable but moreover to admit a piecewise linear atlas, a PL-structure:

Let be a simplicial complex such that every point admits an open neighborhood such that there is a triangulation of and a piecewise linear homeomorphism . Then is said to be a piecewise linear (PL) manifold of dimension and the triangulation together with the PL-atlas is said to be a PL-structure on.

An important lemma is the following:

Let be a topological space. It is equivalent

  1. is an -dimensional manifold and admits a PL-structure.
  2. There is a triangulation of such that the link of each vertex is an sphere.
  3. For each triangulation of the link of each vertex is an sphere.

The equivalence of the second and the third statement is because that the link of a vertex is independent of the chosen triangulation up to combinatorial isomorphism. [14] One can show that differentiable manifolds admit a PL-structure as well as manifolds of dimension . [15] Counterexamples for the triangulation conjecture are counterexamples for the conjecture of the existence of PL-structure of course.

Moreover, there are examples for triangulated spaces which do not admit a PL-structure. Consider an -dimensional PL-homology-sphere . The double suspension is a topological -sphere. Choosing a triangulation obtained via the suspension operation on triangulations the resulting simplicial complex is not a PL-manifold, because there is a vertex such that is not a sphere. [16]

A question arising with the definition is if PL-structures are always unique: Given two PL-structures for the same space , is there a there a homeomorphism which is piecewise linear with respect to both PL-structures? The assumption is similar to the Hauptvermutung and indeed there are spaces which have different PL-structures which are not equivalent. Triangulation of PL-equivalent spaces can be transformed into one another via Pachner moves:

Pachner Moves

One Pachner-move replaces two tetrahedra by three tetrahedra Pachner Move.png
One Pachner-move replaces two tetrahedra by three tetrahedra

Pachner moves are a way to manipulate triangulations: Let be a simplicial complex. For two simplices the Join

are the points lying on straights between points in and in . Choose such that for any lying not in . A new complex , can be obtained by replacing by . This replacement is called a Pachner move. The theorem of Pachner states that whenever two triangulated manifolds are PL-equivalent, there is a series of Pachner moves transforming both into another. [17]

Cellular complexes

The real projective plane as a simplicial complex and as CW-complex. As CW-complex it can be obtained by gluing first
D
0
{\displaystyle \mathbb {D} ^{0}}
and
D
1
{\displaystyle \mathbb {D} ^{1}}
to get the 1-sphere and then attaching the disc
D
2
{\displaystyle \mathbb {D} ^{2}}
by the map
g
:
S
1
-
S
1
,
e
i
x
-
e
2
i
x
{\displaystyle g:\mathbb {S} ^{1}\rightarrow \mathbb {S} ^{1},e^{ix}\mapsto e^{2ix}}
. Projective Ebene4.png
The real projective plane as a simplicial complex and as CW-complex. As CW-complex it can be obtained by gluing first and to get the 1-sphere and then attaching the disc by the map .

A similar but more flexible construction than simplicial complexes is the one of cellular complexes (or CW-complexes). Its construction is as follows:

An -cell is the closed -dimensional unit-ball , an open -cell is its inner . Let be a topological space, let be a continuous map. The gluing is said to be obtained by gluing on an -cell.

A cell complex is a union of topological spaces such that

Each simplicial complex is a CW-complex, the inverse is not true. The construction of CW-complexes can be used to define cellular homology and one can show that cellular homology and simplicial homology coincide. [18] For computational issues, it is sometimes easier to assume spaces to be CW-complexes and determine their homology via cellular decomposition, an example is the projective plane : Its construction as a CW-complex needs three cells, whereas its simplicial complex consists of 54 simplices.

Other applications

Classification of manifolds

By triangulating 1-dimensional manifolds, one can show that they are always homeomorphic to disjoint copies of the real line and the unit sphere . Moreover, surfaces, i.e. 2-manifolds, can be classified completely: Let be a compact surface.

To prove this theorem one constructs a fundamental polygon of the surface: This can be done by using the simplicial structure obtained by the triangulation. [19]

Maps on simplicial complexes

Giving spaces the structure of a simplicial structure might help to understand maps defined on the spaces. The maps can often be assumed to be simplicial maps via the simplicial approximation theorem:

Simplicial approximation

Let , be abstract simplicial complexes above sets , . A simplicial map is a function which maps each simplex in onto a simplex in . By affin-linear extension on the simplices, induces a map between the geometric realizations of the complexes. Each point in a geometric complex lies in the inner of exactly one simplex, its support. Consider now a continuous map . A simplicial map is said to be a simplicial approximation of if and only if each is mapped by onto the support of in . If such an approximation exists, one can construct a homotopy transforming into by defining it on each simplex; there it always exists, because simplices are contractible.

The simplicial approximation theorem guarantees for every continuous function the existence of a simplicial approximation at least after refinement of , for instance by replacing by its iterated barycentric subdivision. [2] The theorem plays an important role for certain statements in algebraic topology in order to reduce the behavior of continuous maps on those of simplicial maps, for instance in Lefschetz's fixed-point theorem.

Lefschetz's fixed-point theorem

The Lefschetz number is a useful tool to find out whether a continuous function admits fixed-points. This data is computed as follows: Suppose that and are topological spaces that admit finite triangulations. A continuous map induces homomorphisms between its simplicial homology groups with coefficients in a field . These are linear maps between -vector spaces, so their trace can be determined and their alternating sum

is called the Lefschetz number of . If , this number is the Euler characteristic of . The fixpoint theorem states that whenever , has a fixed-point. In the proof this is first shown only for simplicial maps and then generalized for any continuous functions via the approximation theorem. Brouwer's fixpoint theorem treats the case where is an endomorphism of the unit-ball. For all its homology groups vanishes, and is always the identity, so , so has a fixpoint. [20]

Formula of Riemann-Hurwitz

The Riemann-Hurwitz formula allows to determine the genus of a compact, connected Riemann surface without using explicit triangulation. The proof needs the existence of triangulations for surfaces in an abstract sense: Let be a non-constant holomorphic function on a surface with known genus. The relation between the genus of the surfaces and is

where denotes the degree of the map. The sum is well defined as it counts only the ramifying points of the function.

The background of this formula is that holomorphic functions on Riemann surfaces are ramified coverings. The formula can be found by examining the image of the simplicial structure near to ramifiying points. [21]

Citations

  1. 1 2 John M. Lee (2000), Springer Verlag (ed.), Introduction to Topological manifolds (in German), New York/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, p. 92, ISBN   0-387-98759-2
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 James R. Munkres (1984), Elements of algebraic topology (in German), vol. 1984, Menlo Park, California: Addison Wesley, p. 83, ISBN   0-201-04586-9
  3. 1 2 J. H. C. Whitehead (1940), "On C1-Complexes", Annals of Mathematics (in German), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 809–824, doi:10.2307/1968861, ISSN   0003-486X, JSTOR   1968861
  4. J. W. Alexander (1926), "Combinatorial Analysis Situs", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (in German), vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 301–329, doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1926-1501346-5 , ISSN   0002-9947, JSTOR   1989117
  5. R. Stöcker, H. Zieschang (1994), Algebraische Topologie (in German) (2. überarbeitete ed.), Stuttgart: B.G.Teubner, p. 270, ISBN   3-519-12226-X
  6. 1 2 Allen Hatcher (2006), Algebraic Topologie (in German), Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, p. 110, ISBN   0-521-79160--X
  7. A.A.Ranicki. "One the Hauptvermutung" (PDF). The Hauptvermutung Book.
  8. 1 2 John Milnor (1961), "Two Complexes Which are Homeomorphic But Combinatorially Distinct", The Annals of Mathematics (in German), vol. 74, no. 3, p. 575, doi:10.2307/1970299, ISSN   0003-486X, JSTOR   1970299
  9. Marshall M. Cohen (1973), "A Course in Simple-Homotopy Theory", Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (in German), vol. 10, doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9372-6, ISBN   978-0-387-90055-1, ISSN   0072-5285
  10. Edwin Moise (1977), Geometric Topology in Dimensions 2 and 3 (in German), New York: Springer Verlag
  11. Tibor Rado. "Über den Begriff der Riemannschen Fläche" (PDF).
  12. R. C. Kirby, L. C. Siebenmann (1977-12-31), "Annex B. On The Triangulation of Manifolds and the Hauptvermutung", Foundational Essays on Topological Manifolds, Smoothings, and Triangulations. (AM-88) (in German), Princeton University Press, pp. 299–306
  13. "Chapter IV; Casson's Invariant for Oriented Homology 3-spheres", Casson's Invariant for Oriented Homology Three-Spheres (in German), Princeton University Press, pp. 63–79, 1990-12-31
  14. Toenniessen, Fridtjof (2017), Topologie (PDF) (in German), doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54964-3, ISBN   978-3-662-54963-6 , retrieved 2022-04-20
  15. Edwin E. Moise (1952), "Affine Structures in 3-Manifolds: V. The Triangulation Theorem and Hauptvermutung", The Annals of Mathematics (in German), vol. 56, no. 1, p. 96, doi:10.2307/1969769, ISSN   0003-486X, JSTOR   1969769
  16. Robert D. Edwards (2006-10-18), "Suspensions of homology spheres", arXiv:math/0610573 (in German), arXiv: math/0610573 , Bibcode:2006math.....10573E
  17. W B R Lickorish (1999-11-20), "Simplicial moves on complexes and manifolds", Proceedings of the Kirbyfest (in German), Mathematical Sciences Publishers, arXiv: math/9911256 , doi:10.2140/gtm.1999.2.299, S2CID   9765634
  18. Toenniessen, Fridtjof (2017), Topologie (PDF) (in German), p. 315, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54964-3, ISBN   978-3-662-54963-6 , retrieved 2022-04-20
  19. Seifert, H. (Herbert), 1907-1996. (2003), Lehrbuch der Topologie (in German), AMS Chelsea Pub., ISBN   0-8218-3595-5 {{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  20. Bredon, Glen E. (1993), Springer Verlag (ed.), Topology and Geometry (in German), Berlin/ Heidelberg/ New York, pp. 254 f, ISBN   3-540-97926-3 {{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  21. Otto Forster (1977), "Kompakte Riemannsche Flächen", Heidelberger Taschenbücher (in German), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 88–154, ISBN   978-3-540-08034-3

See also

Literature

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algebraic topology</span> Branch of mathematics

Algebraic topology is a branch of mathematics that uses tools from abstract algebra to study topological spaces. The basic goal is to find algebraic invariants that classify topological spaces up to homeomorphism, though usually most classify up to homotopy equivalence.

In mathematics, a chain complex is an algebraic structure that consists of a sequence of abelian groups and a sequence of homomorphisms between consecutive groups such that the image of each homomorphism is included in the kernel of the next. Associated to a chain complex is its homology, which describes how the images are included in the kernels.

In mathematics, the term homology, originally introduced in algebraic topology, has three primary, closely-related usages. The most direct usage of the term is to take the homology of a chain complex, resulting in a sequence of abelian groups called homology groups. This operation, in turn, allows one to associate various named homologies or homology theories to various other types of mathematical objects. Lastly, since there are many homology theories for topological spaces that produce the same answer, one also often speaks of the homology of a topological space. There is also a related notion of the cohomology of a cochain complex, giving rise to various cohomology theories, in addition to the notion of the cohomology of a topological space.

In mathematics, specifically in homology theory and algebraic topology, cohomology is a general term for a sequence of abelian groups, usually one associated with a topological space, often defined from a cochain complex. Cohomology can be viewed as a method of assigning richer algebraic invariants to a space than homology. Some versions of cohomology arise by dualizing the construction of homology. In other words, cochains are functions on the group of chains in homology theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simplicial complex</span> Mathematical set

In mathematics, a simplicial complex is a set composed of points, line segments, triangles, and their n-dimensional counterparts. Simplicial complexes should not be confused with the more abstract notion of a simplicial set appearing in modern simplicial homotopy theory. The purely combinatorial counterpart to a simplicial complex is an abstract simplicial complex. To distinguish a simplicial complex from an abstract simplicial complex, the former is often called a geometric simplicial complex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orbifold</span> Generalized manifold

In the mathematical disciplines of topology and geometry, an orbifold is a generalization of a manifold. Roughly speaking, an orbifold is a topological space which is locally a finite group quotient of a Euclidean space.

In algebraic topology, the Betti numbers are used to distinguish topological spaces based on the connectivity of n-dimensional simplicial complexes. For the most reasonable finite-dimensional spaces, the sequence of Betti numbers is 0 from some point onward, and they are all finite.

In algebraic topology, singular homology refers to the study of a certain set of algebraic invariants of a topological space X, the so-called homology groups Intuitively, singular homology counts, for each dimension n, the n-dimensional holes of a space. Singular homology is a particular example of a homology theory, which has now grown to be a rather broad collection of theories. Of the various theories, it is perhaps one of the simpler ones to understand, being built on fairly concrete constructions.

In mathematics, the simplicial approximation theorem is a foundational result for algebraic topology, guaranteeing that continuous mappings can be approximated by ones that are piecewise of the simplest kind. It applies to mappings between spaces that are built up from simplices—that is, finite simplicial complexes. The general continuous mapping between such spaces can be represented approximately by the type of mapping that is (affine-) linear on each simplex into another simplex, at the cost (i) of sufficient barycentric subdivision of the simplices of the domain, and (ii) replacement of the actual mapping by a homotopic one.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barycentric subdivision</span>

In mathematics, the barycentric subdivision is a standard way to subdivide a given simplex into smaller ones. Its extension on simplicial complexes is a canonical method to refine them. Therefore, the barycentric subdivision is an important tool in algebraic topology.

In algebraic topology, a homology sphere is an n-manifold X having the homology groups of an n-sphere, for some integer . That is,

In topology, a branch of mathematics, intersection homology is an analogue of singular homology especially well-suited for the study of singular spaces, discovered by Mark Goresky and Robert MacPherson in the fall of 1974 and developed by them over the next few years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abstract simplicial complex</span> Mathematical object

In combinatorics, an abstract simplicial complex (ASC), often called an abstract complex or just a complex, is a family of sets that is closed under taking subsets, i.e., every subset of a set in the family is also in the family. It is a purely combinatorial description of the geometric notion of a simplicial complex. For example, in a 2-dimensional simplicial complex, the sets in the family are the triangles, their edges, and their vertices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Čech cohomology</span>

In mathematics, specifically algebraic topology, Čech cohomology is a cohomology theory based on the intersection properties of open covers of a topological space. It is named for the mathematician Eduard Čech.

In algebraic topology, simplicial homology is the sequence of homology groups of a simplicial complex. It formalizes the idea of the number of holes of a given dimension in the complex. This generalizes the number of connected components.

The Hauptvermutung of geometric topology is a now refuted conjecture asking whether any two triangulations of a triangulable space have subdivisions that are combinatorially equivalent, i.e. the subdivided triangulations are built up in the same combinatorial pattern. It was originally formulated as a conjecture in 1908 by Ernst Steinitz and Heinrich Franz Friedrich Tietze, but it is now known to be false.

In mathematics, Kan complexes and Kan fibrations are part of the theory of simplicial sets. Kan fibrations are the fibrations of the standard model category structure on simplicial sets and are therefore of fundamental importance. Kan complexes are the fibrant objects in this model category. The name is in honor of Daniel Kan.

In mathematics, a Δ-set, often called a Δ-complex or a semi-simplicial set, is a combinatorial object that is useful in the construction and triangulation of topological spaces, and also in the computation of related algebraic invariants of such spaces. A Δ-set is somewhat more general than a simplicial complex, yet not quite as sophisticated as a simplicial set. Simplicial sets have additional structure, so that every simplicial set is also a semi-simplicial set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudomanifold</span>

In mathematics, a pseudomanifold is a special type of topological space. It looks like a manifold at most of its points, but it may contain singularities. For example, the cone of solutions of forms a pseudomanifold.

This is a glossary of properties and concepts in algebraic topology in mathematics.